Sheet pile retaining wall system
10094088 ยท 2018-10-09
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
E02D2300/0032
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02D2600/20
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02D17/207
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E02D5/08
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A one-step sheet pile retaining wall system for embankment widening typically associated with highway widening not requiring temporary shoring. The wall system may provide a front wall face having a plurality of resistance fins perpendicularly extending therefrom. The fin sheet piles first include a brace fin sheet for reducing stresses in the front wall face, then a series of cradle fin sheets terminating at an elevation below the brace fin sheet for accommodating a pipe drainage/utility cradle, and finally a series of predominantly resistance fin sheets terminating at an elevation above the cradle fin sheets. Between the slope of the existing embankment and the higher front wall face may be cementitious flowable backfill for pre-stressing the wall system when fluid and, when set, supporting the aforementioned cradle, from which the remaining construction can build off of while reducing overall earth pressure acting on the wall face upon completion of construction.
Claims
1. An embankment retaining system, comprising: a face wall defining a front face of the embankment having an existing gradient; the face wall including a plurality of face wall sheet piles, wherein each face wall sheet pile terminates at a cantilever elevation located above the gradient; at least one brace fin sheet pile, each brace fin sheet pile spaced apart along and perpendicularly connected to the face wall, each brace fin sheet pile terminating at a brace elevation located between the cantilever elevation and the gradient; a plurality of cradle fin sheet piles connected linearly to each brace fin sheet pile, each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles terminating at a cradle elevation located below the brace elevation but above the gradient; and a plurality of resistance fin sheet piles connected linearly to each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles, wherein each plurality of resistance fin sheet piles terminates at a resistance elevation located above the cradle elevation, whereby each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles interconnects each respective brace fin sheet pile and respective plurality of resistance fin sheet piles so that said respective sheet piles define a linear relationship relative to each other; further comprising: a cementitious backfill disposed in each backfill space defined by the gradient, the face wall, and adjacent pluralities of the cradle fin sheet piles.
2. The embankment retaining system of claim 1, further comprising: a drainage/utility cradle seated on the cementitious backfill.
3. The embankment retaining system of claim 1, wherein the gradient is step notched so as to further define the backfill space.
4. The embankment retaining system of claim 1, further comprising: a three-way connector interconnecting each adjacent face wall sheet piles and each brace fin sheet pile.
5. The embankment retaining system of claim 1, wherein all sheet piles are generally corrugated.
6. A method of installing a retaining system for widening of an embankment having a gradient, the method comprising the steps: driving an embankment retaining system into the embankment, the embankment retaining system comprising: a face wall defining a front face of the embankment having an existing gradient; the face wall including a plurality of face wall sheet piles, wherein each face wall sheet pile terminates at a cantilever elevation located above the gradient; at least one brace fin sheet pile, each brace fin sheet pile spaced apart along and perpendicularly connected to the face wall, each brace fin sheet pile terminating at a brace elevation located between the cantilever elevation and the gradient; a plurality of cradle fin sheet piles connected linearly to each brace fin sheet pile, each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles terminating at a cradle elevation located below the brace elevation but above the gradient; and a plurality of resistance fin sheet piles connected linearly to each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles, wherein each plurality of resistance fin sheet piles terminates at a resistance elevation located above the cradle elevation, whereby each plurality of cradle fin sheet piles interconnects each respective brace fin sheet pile and respective plurality of resistance fin sheet piles so that said respective sheet piles define a linear relationship relative to each other, and wherein the face wall, the gradient, and adjacent pluralities of cradle fin sheet piles define a backfill space; and pouring a cementitious flowable backfill in each backfill space so as to pre-stress the face wall and said respective sheet piles.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of: allowing the cementitious flowable backfill to set; and seating a drainage/utility cradle on the set cementitious backfill, wherein the set cementitious backfill serves to reduce stresses acting on the face wall for a completed condition.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein temporary shoring to support an adjacent highway is not provided.
9. The method of claim 6, further comprising step-notching the gradient before pouring the cementitious flowable backfill.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(8) The following detailed description is of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out exemplary embodiments of the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
(9) Broadly, an embodiment of the present invention provides a one-step sheet pile retaining wall system not requiring temporary shoring. The wall system may provide a front face having a plurality of interlocked fin sheets perpendicularly extending therefrom. Between the gradient and the higher front face and adjacent fin sheets will generally be cementitious flowable backfill for pre-stressing the wall system when fluidalong with reducing overall pressure on the wall face when set, thereby supporting a drainage cradle of sufficient width from which storm drainage/utility construction may occur. Between the slope of the existing embankment gradient and the higher front wall face may be cementitious flowable backfill for pre-stressing the wall system when fluid and, when set, supporting the aforementioned cradle, from which the remaining construction can build off of while reducing overall earth pressure acting on the wall face upon completion of construction as a result of this set.
(10) Referring to
(11) It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the use of directional terms such as above, below, and the like are used in relation to the illustrative embodiments as they are depicted in
(12) The cementitious flowable backfill 18 may be used as a pre-stressing measure described more in depth below. In certain embodiments, the cementitious flowable backfill 18 may be operatively engaged to the face wall 22 and fin sheets 80 and 24 (for example via shear studs and reinforcing within the cementitious flowable backfill mass) to help hold back the face wall 22 upon set.
(13) Moreover, the cementitious flowable backfill 18 enables the seating of a drainage cradle 19 on the set cementitious flowable backfill 18. Once the cementitious flowable backfill 18 hardens, it no longer pushes directly against the face wall 22, but sits down vertically on its notched bottom within the embankment. From there, the hardened cementitious flowable backfill 18 provides a platform/pathway for the drainage cradle 19, which is being designed to accommodate pipes/utilities behind the front face wall 22.
(14) Referring to
(15) Geotechnical Considerations
(16) The perpendicular sheets will serve as vertically planar, continuous tiebacks, i.e., fins providing resistance to lateral loading acting on the wall through the following mechanisms: a) soil/steel interaction, i.e., shear resistance including friction (and cohesion) and b) the dead weight of the fins including soil adhering to them enhanced by vibratory densification during pile driving to provide additional restoring moment to the overall wall system. It being understood that the design of the sheet pile wall system 10 as well as the designs of other wall typesparticularly those founded within slopeswill need to consider global stability as part of the overall design processas well as other design criteria peculiar to each wall type. It being understood that the embankment being retained has an upper surface, the inclined part of the embankment, or gradient.
(17) In one embodiment, the sheet pile wall system 10 may incorporate cementitious flowable backfill 18 in a backfill portion of the wedge defined by the existing ground slope/gradient and the wall face 22, said backfill portion being bounded along its upper periphery by the pipe/utility cradle 19. The cementitious flowable backfill 18 is generally less expensive than properly-compacted embankment material, select or otherwise, as the compacted embankment material requires placement in relatively-thin lifts, which in turn requires significantly more time for placement and compaction to achieve a comparable degree of performance from a settlement-limiting aspect. The hydrostatic fluid pressure of the cementitious flowable backfill 18 will act to pre-stress the wall system 10 prior to set before placement of the overlying backfill and pavement structure. And by incorporating step notching 27, as illustrated in
(18) Structural Considerations
(19) From a structural standpoint, the most critical point along the wall face is where it is cantilevered above the brace fin sheet pile 80 directly connecting to the face with moment within the wall sheet being the controlling factor in its design. The brace fin sheet pile 80 connected to the wall face 22 is higher than the adjoining several cradle fin sheets 29, the tops of which are depressed from sheets on either side, terminating at cradle bottom 31, to serve as a cradle 19 to allow for construction of pipes/utilities 33 behind the wall face 22, as illustrated in
(20) The fin sheets will act in tensionserving as vertically-planar, continuous anchorsproviding resistance to lateral movement of the wall face 22. With the strength of steel being measured in tens of thousands of kips per square inch, the interconnected, continuous nature of sheet piles results in loadings in tension being relatively low when compared to the available strengthand it is for this reason that fin sheet sizes (weights) may be considerably less than sheet sizes required for the wall face.
(21) In addition to essentially eliminating the need for temporary shoring to allow for the construction of this particular sheet pile retaining wall system 20, the other big key to its economic success is the methodology for how it is constructed.
(22) Construction Methodology
(23) Basically, a temporary working bench 23 upon which the pile driving unit would be situated would be excavated to a depth of 18 inches to 2 feet below the innermost fin sheets, i.e., those sheets situated higher on the embankment closer to active traffic. (The 18 inch to 2 foot clearance would allow for the pile hammer to grab/secure these piles for subsequent driving.) Generally speaking (but not always), sheet piles would be driven in two groups to allow for greater constructability. Group 1 piles 25a would include the wall face 22 and those fin piles in the immediate area of the roadway drainage/utility cradle. A sufficient number of fin sheets would be installed to provide a) the necessary lateral restraint of the wall face through tensional fin resistance and b) sufficient capacity to resist overturning of the enclosed gravity mass
to allow for backfilling up to the bottom of the cradle with cementitious, flowable material for this temporary loading condition.
(24) Following Group 1 pile 25a installation and cementitious, flowable backfill installation, Group 2 pile 25b installation to complete fin installation would begin. (This cementitious backfillonce set after placement in lifts generally limited to a 3 to 4-foot maximum thicknesswill serve to reduce loading on the wall face 22 which is not only an important feature for the completed wall system 10 but also a factor in limiting loading on the wall face 22 when backfilling up to the bottom of the cradle 19 with only Group 1 piles 25a in place). And once Group 1 25a and Group 2 piles 25b are in place within a given stretch of highway, backfilling with earthen (non-cementitious) material beneath the entire roadway in the wall construction zone would occur. In conjunction with this construction would be installation of roadway drainage (and utilities) within the specified cradle 19. At this point, construction of the overlying pavement structure and moment slab/safety barrier (or guide rail) would then occur. Please see the
(25) Now with particular regard to the development of tension in the wall fins, a slight, inward transverse force would be applied to the fin sheets during vibrating/driving, thus removing play in the interlocks. As necessary to keep the wall face within horizontal tolerance, wall sheets at the 3-way connectors 32 would be re-visited and a slight, outward transverse force would be applied to the pile hammer. Vertical tolerance would be achieved by driving pile lengths longer than design lengths and cutting/burning off the excess.
(26) Referring to
(27) It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.