ULTRA SUPER SINGLE TIRE FOR HEAVY DUTY

Abstract

An ultra super single tire for heavy duty includes a tread that contacts the road surface; a carcass that constitutes the skeleton of the tire; and a belt layer that is disposed between the tread and the carcass, in which the belt layer is composed of a first belt to a fourth belt that are laminated sequentially from the carcass toward the tread, the first belt includes an extender belt, and the second belt is a wide spiral coil belt. Thus, an excessive increase in weight, the occurrence of excessive heat generation, and deterioration of durability can be prevented, while enhancing the ground contact length at the ground contacting center, and further enhancing the durability at belt layer edges.

Claims

1. An ultra super single tire for heavy duty, the ultra super single tire comprising: a tread that contacts the road surface; a carcass that constitutes the skeleton of the tire; and a belt layer that is disposed between the tread and the carcass, wherein the belt layer includes a first belt, a second belt, a third belt, and a fourth belt, which are laminated sequentially from the carcass toward the tread side, the first belt includes an extender belt, and the second belt is a wide spiral coil belt.

2. The ultra super single tire for heavy duty according to claim 1, wherein when the level difference between an edge of the third belt and an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt) is designated as S1, the level difference between an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt) and an edge of the extender belt is designated as S2, and the width of the extender belt is designated as EBw, the following relations are satisfied: 7.5 mm<S1<15 mm, 20 mm<S2, and 20 mm<EBw.

3. The ultra super single tire for heavy duty according to claim 2, wherein the angle of inclination at an edge of a first main belt of the first belt is in the range of 50+5, the angle of inclination at an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt) is 0, and the angle of inclination at an edge of the third belt and the angle of inclination at an edge of the fourth belt are respectively in the range of 185.

4. The ultra super single tire for heavy duty according to claim 2, wherein the angle of inclination of the extender belt is different from the angle of inclination at an edge of the first main belt of the first belt.

5. The ultra super single tire for heavy duty according to claim 4, wherein the angle of inclination of the extender belt is in the range of 105.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the footprint shape and the bend shape resulting from widening of a conventional tire fir heavy duty.

[0015] FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating a tire having a five-layer belt (four belts+S belt) structure including a conventional spiral coil belt as a third layer.

[0016] FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram illustrating the spiral coil belt of FIG. 2, and FIG. 3B is a schematic diagram illustrating a conventional sheet type belt.

[0017] FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically illustrating a tire having a belt structure including the wide spiral coil belt and the extender belt according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0018] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a cross-section of the tread in order to explain the belt laminate structure of FIG. 4.

[0019] FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the wide spiral coil belt of FIG. 5.

[0020] FIG. 7 is a table of comparison showing a comparison of the shear strain distributions for the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and a deformed belt structure in which the position of the spiral coil belt has been changed.

[0021] FIG. 8 is a table of comparison showing a comparison of the shear strain distributions between belt layers in the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and the belt structure of FIG. 4 (present disclosure).

[0022] FIG. 9 is a table of comparison showing a comparison of the footprint shapes of the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and the belt structure of FIG. 4 (present disclosure).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0023] Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. However, this explanation is intended to describe the present disclosure in detail to the extent that those ordinarily skilled in the art to which the present disclosure is pertained can easily carry out the present disclosure, and it does not mean that the technical idea and scope of the present disclosure will be limited by the preferred embodiments.

[0024] FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically illustrating a tire having a belt structure including the wide spiral coil belt and the extender belt according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, and FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a cross-section of the tread for explaining the belt laminated structure of FIG. 4.

[0025] According to FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, the ultra super single tire for heavy duty (100) according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a tread (110) that contacts the road surface, a carcass (120) that constitutes the skeleton of the tire, and a belt layer (130) that is disposed between the tread (110) and the carcass (120).

[0026] The tread (110) is a part that contacts the ground surface (road surface) and is formed from a rubber material.

[0027] The carcass (120) is formed by stacking several sheets of cord plies formed from high-strength synthetic fibers, and forms the skeleton of the tire.

[0028] The belt layer (130) is disposed between the tread (110) and the carcass (120), and is composed of a first belt (131), a second belt (132), a third belt (133), and a fourth belt (134) disposed sequentially from the carcass (120) toward the tread (110). The first belt (131) is composed of a first main belt (131a) and an extender belt (131b), and the second belt (132) is formed from a wide spiral coil belt (WSC).

[0029] The extender belt (131b) is a belt made of a material that is identical or similar to that of the first main belt (131a), and is a belt extending from the first main belt (131a) only in the length in the width direction. The wide spiral coil belt (WSC) needs a level difference because in a case in which the belt is produced from spiral coils as illustrated in FIG. 6 (see FIG. 3A), the belt layer of the lower layer (#1 belt) should support the spiral coil of the upper layer. As such, a belt having a wider width than the belt layer of the lower layer (#1 belt) is the wide spiral coil belt (WSC), and the portion having an increased width in the belt layer of the lower layer in order to support the spiral coil of the upper layer is referred to as extender belt.

[0030] In FIG. 5, S1 represents the level difference between an edge of the third belt (133) and an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt, 132), S2 represents the level difference between an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt, 132) and an edge of the extender belt (131b), and EBw represents the width of the extender belt (131b). Their dimensional ranges are ranges satisfying the following relations: 7.5 mm<S1<15 mm, 20 mm<S2, and 20 mm<EBw. TW/2 represents the half tread width.

[0031] The angle of inclination at an edge of the first main belt (131a) of the first belt (131) is in the range of 505, the angle of inclination at an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt, 132) is 0, and the angle of inclination at an edge of the third belt (133) and the angle of inclination at an edge of the fourth belt are respectively in the range of 185.

[0032] The angle of inclination of the extender belt (131b) is different from the angle of inclination at an edge of the first main belt (131a) of the first belt (131), and the angle of inclination of the extender belt (131b) is in the range of 105.

[0033] FIG. 7 is a table of comparison showing a comparison based on a computational analysis of the shear strain distributions for the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and a deformed belt structure in which the position of the spiral coil belt has been changed. FIG. 7 shows the shear strains generated at an edge of a belt layer at the time of compression and at the time of loading.

[0034] Deformation 1 shows a five-layer belt (four belts+S belt) structure including a spiral coil belt (13) as a first layer on the carcass (CS); Deformation 2 shows a five-layer belt (four belts+S belt) structure including a spiral coil belt (13) as a second layer on the carcass (CS); Deformation 3 shows a five-layer belt (four belts+S belt) structure including a spiral coil belt (13) s a fourth layer on the carcass (CS); and Deformation 4 shows a five-layer belt (four belts+S belt) structure including a spiral coil belt (13) as a fifth layer on the carcass (CS). As shown in the table, it can be seen that the interlaminar shear strain (ISS) occurring at the edges of the belt layers does not vary significantly with the order of lamination.

[0035] FIG. 8 is a table of comparison showing a comparison based on a computational analysis of the shear strain distributions between the belt layers in the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and the belt structure of FIG. 4 (present disclosure), and FIG. 9 is a table of comparison showing a comparison based on a computational analysis of the footprints of the belt structure of FIG. 2 (conventional) and the belt structure of FIG. 4 (present disclosure). The invention example disclosed in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 are results obtained by performing an experiment with a belt structure in which S1 was 10 mm, S2 was 10 mm, EBw was 10 mm, the angle of inclination at an edge of the first main belt (131a) of the first belt (131) was 50, the angle of inclination at an edge of the wide spiral coil belt (second belt, 132) was 0, the angle of inclination at an edge of the third belt (133) and the angle of inclination at an edge of the fourth belt (134) were respectively 18, and the angle of inclination of the extender belt (131b) was 10 (see FIG. 5).

[0036] As shown in FIG. 8, it can be seen that in the structure of an Example of the present disclosure (FIG. 4), the shear strain occurring at the belt edges was decreased by about 77% compared to the structure of a conventional example (FIG. 2). As shown in FIG. 7 as such, it is understood that the shear strain that conventionally occurs at belt edges does not occur in the Example of the present disclosure.

[0037] Furthermore, it can be seen that compared to the conventional example such as shown in FIG. 9, the ground contact length on the shoulder side is decreased in the Example of the present disclosure. Meanwhile, in a case in which an actual ultra super single tire is produced and experiments are performed with the tire, the ground contact length on the shoulder side can be minimized when the structure of the present disclosure, which is accompanied by a phenomenon in which the ground contact length increases significantly compared to a computational analysis, is applied.

[0038] The present disclosure has been explained with reference to the embodiments depicted in the diagrams; however, the embodiments are only for illustrative purpose, and a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the present disclosure is pertained will be able to understand that various modifications and other equivalent embodiments can be included in the present disclosure. Therefore, the true technical scope of the present disclosure to be protected should be defined by the technical idea of the attached claims.

REFERENCE NUMERALS

[0039] 100: Ultra super single tire for heavy duty [0040] 110: Tread [0041] 120: Carcass [0042] 130: Belt layer [0043] 131: First belt [0044] 131a: First main belt [0045] 131b: Extender belt [0046] 132: Wide spiral coil belt (second belt) [0047] 133: Third belt [0048] 134: Fourth belt [0049] S1: Level difference between edge of third belt and edge of wide spiral coil belt [0050] S2: Level difference between edge of wide spiral coil belt and edge of extender belt [0051] EBw: Width of extender belt [0052] TW/2: Half tread width