METHOD OF PRODUCING AND REFINING CARRIER-FREE LUTETIUM-177 USING CHROMATOGRAPHY
20240318283 ยท 2024-09-26
Assignee
Inventors
- Kang Hyuk CHOI (Daejeon, KR)
- Ul Jae Park (Daejeon, KR)
- Jun Sing LEE (Daejeon, KR)
- A Ran KIM (Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR)
Cpc classification
G21G2001/0094
PHYSICS
C22B3/24
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
B01D15/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D15/42
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C22B3/24
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method of producing and refining carrier-free lutetium-177 using chromatography, and more specifically to a method of producing and refining carrier-free lutetium 1-77 using chromatography having excellent resolution of lutetium and ytterbium without a concentration gradient of an eluent.
Claims
1. A method for separating carrier-free lutetium-177 (Lu-177), which sequentially performs chromatography for a mixture comprising a compound of ytterbium and lutetium-177 (Lu-177) produced by irradiating neutrons at a compound of ytterbium-176 (Yb-176) as a target by 2 columns below: 1) separation column: a separation column with a cation exchange resin as a stationary phase, and saturated with a first eluent comprising at least one of primary to quaternary aminium ions and a chelating agent in a column filled with the stationary phase; and 2) purification column: a purification column with the cation exchange resin as a stationary phase, and impregnated with water, wherein the first eluent is used as a mobile phase.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein lutetium-177 (Lu-177) is eluted first in the separation column, and then ytterbium (Yb) is eluted.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first eluent is a single eluent without a concentration gradient.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein when lutetium-177 is eluted in the separation column, the first eluent comprising the eluted lutetium-177 is introduced into the purification column, and wherein when the separation of lutetium-177 is completed or ytterbium is eluted in the separation column, a second eluent comprising at least one of primary to quaternary aminium ions and a chelate agent is used as a mobile phase, and the separated ytterbium is introduced into a separate column to perform chromatography to obtain ytterbium.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of the chelate agent and the primary to quaternary aminium ions of the second eluent is higher than that of the first eluent.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cation exchange resin comprises at least one selected from a sulfate group (SO.sub.3H), a phosphate group (OP(O)(OH).sub.2 or P(O)(OH).sub.2) and a carboxyl group (C(O)OH) in an organic, inorganic or organic-inorganic mixture support.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the aminium ion is an ion represented by Chemical Formula 1 below, a secondary to quaternary aminium ion comprising a heteroalipathic ring or heteroaromatic ring of 5 to 30 atoms including a nitrogen atom in a ring, or a mixture thereof: ##STR00003## wherein in Chemical Formula 1, at least one of R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 is a substituted or unsubstituted C.sub.1 to C.sub.8 linear or branched alkyl group and the rest is hydrogen, and wherein the R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 are identical to or different from each other.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the substituted C.sub.1 to C.sub.8 linear or branched alkyl group is substituted with a hydrophilic functional group.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the hydrophilic functional group is each independently one selected from a hydroxyl group, a carbonyl group, an amine group, a carboxyl group, an ester group, an alkoxy group, an amide group, an imine group, an oxime group, a thiol group, a sulfide group, a sulfoxide group, a thioketone group and a thioester group.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the aminium ion is a primary aminium ion.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the chelating agent is a compound of C.sub.2 to C.sub.12 monocarboxylic acid, dicarboxylic acid, tricarboxylic acid or tetracarboxylic acid which further comprises a hydrophilic functional group other than a carboxyl group, or a salt thereof.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the chelating agent is 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid (2-HIBA).
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the chelating agent in the first eluent is 0.01M to 0.5M.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the aminium ion in the first eluent is 0.01M to 1.0M.
15. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of the chelating agent in the second eluent is 0.1M to 1.0M.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein a purification step by the purification column introduces a second eluent comprising carrier-free lutetium-177 eluted in the separation column into the purification column, and comprises the steps of: a) eluting the chelating agent and amine mixture included in the first eluent using an organic or inorganic acid having a concentration of 0.1M to 2M as a mobile phase; and b) subsequently eluting carrier-free lutetium-177 with an organic or inorganic acid having a concentration of 3M to 12M as a mobile phase.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
BEST MODE
[0046] According to the method for separating lutetium-177 of the present invention, it is possible to produce carrier-free lutetium-177 due to the improved resolution without using a gradient eluent. Accordingly, it is also possible to achieve the effects of reducing the amount of expensive cation exchange resins used and the amount of waste generated, and the carrier-free lutetium-177 can be separated within a short period of time.
[0047] In addition, since the eluent without a concentration gradient is used, there is an advantage in that the eluent can be recycled, and the separation and purification processes can be simplified.
Modes of the Invention
[0048] As described above, it was difficult to obtain high-purity lutetium-177 by the conventional lutetium separation method, and it had disadvantages that it required a lot of time for separation, such as requiring many separation columns and the like, and required a concentration gradient as an eluent.
[0049] Accordingly, as a result of devoting efforts to research and development in order to solve these problems, the inventors of the present invention have derived the present invention.
[0050] The present invention follows the indirect production method targeting ytterbium-176 (Yb-176) instead of the direct production method, which is a method of irradiating neutrons by targeting lutetium-176, which is an isotope of lutetium-177 (Lu-177). When the direct production method is followed, the ratio of lutetium-177 in the produced lutetium is within about 2%, and there is a problem in that the ratio of the carrier is very high. The indirect production method produces less isotope lutetium-177 compared to the direct production method, but the content of other isotopes is small and the amount of side reaction products is remarkably small, and thus, when lutetium is separated from the mixture with high purity, it has an advantage of having more excellent utility as a medical label.
[0051] A schematic reaction formula of the neutron capture reaction of the indirect production method is as follows.
[0052] The present invention specifically relates to a method for separating lutetium-177 produced by the neutron capture reaction from ytterbium (ytterbium-176 and ytterbium-177). The separation method is by chromatography, and the present invention has confirmed that the resolution of the chromatogram is significantly different as the stationary phase and the mobile phase of the column are adjusted, and accordingly, it has provided a method for separating carrier-free lutetium-177 that can save time and costs.
[0053] The method for separating carrier-free lutetium-177 according to the present invention is a method for separating a mixture including a compound of ytterbium and lutetium-177 (Lu-177) produced by irradiating neutrons to a compound of ytterbium-176 (Yb-176) according to the indirection production method by sequential chromatography using the following two-step columns. [0054] 1) Separation column: a separation column with a cation exchange resin as a stationary phase, and saturated with a first eluent including at least one of primary to quaternary aminium ions and a chelating agent in a column filled with the stationary phase; and [0055] 2) Purification column: a purification column with the cation exchange resin as a stationary phase, and impregnated with water.
[0056] Herein, the mobile phase in the separation column is the first eluent.
[0057] Chromatography in the separation column may finely change the polarity of an eluent by including one or more primary to quaternary aminium ions (NR.sub.4.sup.+, R is each independently an alkyl group or hydrogen) substituted with one or more alkyl groups together with ammonium ions (NH.sub.4.sup.+), or instead of ammonium ions introduced together with a chelating agent to adjust the pH of the eluent in the conventional lutetium separation method.
[0058] When aminium ions are used, the theoretical plate of the separation column may be improved to increase the retention times of lutetium-177 and ytterbium. Accordingly, while shortening the length of the column, it is possible to have the same resolution as the conventional lutetium separation method, and there is an advantage in that the amount of the cation exchange resin used may be reduced.
[0059] The aminium ion may be an ion represented by Chemical Formula 1 below, a secondary to quaternary aminium ion including a heteroalipathic ring or heteroaromatic ring of 5 to 30 atoms including a nitrogen atom in a ring, or a mixture of two or more thereof.
##STR00002##
[0060] In Chemical Formula 1, at least one of R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 is a substituted or unsubstituted C.sub.1 to C.sub.8 linear or branched alkyl group and the rest is hydrogen, and the R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 are identical to or different from each other.
[0061] Herein, the substituted alkyl group means that a reactive functional group is bound to at least one carbon of the alkyl group, and the reactive functional group preferably means a hydrophilic functional group.
[0062] Preferably, the hydrophilic functional group may be each independently one selected from a hydroxyl group, a carbonyl group, an amine group, a carboxyl group, an ester group, an alkoxy group, an amide group, an imine group, an oxime group, a thiol group, a sulfide group, a sulfoxide group, a thioketone group and a thioester group.
[0063] More preferably, it means a hydroxyl group.
[0064] The column retention time of lutetium-ytterbium in the column has a tendency for ammonium ions<primary aminium ions<hydroxy primary aminium ions<secondary aminium ions<tertiary aminium ions<quaternary aminium ions, depending on the ions included in the eluent. This is also consistent with the tendency of the column separation time.
[0065] As the order of the amine increases, that is, since the quaternary aminium ions have a lower material polarity than the primary aminium ions, the lanthanide compounds stay longer in the cation exchange resin in the equilibrium relationship with the cation exchange resin, and as a result, the column retention time becomes longer. Therefore, the chromatography in the case of including high-order aminium ions increases the elution time compared to the case of using an eluent including low-order aminium ions.
[0066] Conversely, as the order is lowered, that is, since the ammonium ions have a higher material polarity than the primary or quaternary aminium ions, the equilibrium of the mobile phase is more biased than that of the cation exchange resin, which is a stationary phase, and thus, the column retention time is reduced.
[0067] Each of ytterbium and lutetium has different equilibrium relationships and binding affinities between the cation exchange resin as a stationary phase and the eluent as a mobile phase, and eventually the theoretical plate is formed for each ion.
[0068] If the mobile phase is changed by changing the aminium ion of the mobile phase, each of ytterbium and lutetium causes changes in the equilibrium relationship and binding affinity between the eluent and the stationary phase, resulting in a difference in resolution.
[0069] Since the method for separating lutetium-177 according to the present invention has significantly improved resolution of lutetium compared to the conventional method of using an eluent including ammonium ions, it has an advantage of being able to obtain carrier-free lutetium-177 with high purity even though lutetium is obtained by the indirect production method.
[0070] In a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the aminium ion may include a primary aminium ion or a primary aminium ion substituted with a hydroxyl group, and more preferably, a primary aminium ion substituted with an alkyl group having a small number of carbon atoms, or a methylamine cation, an ethylamine cation and an ethanolamine cation, which are aminium ions substituted with a hydroxyl group in the amine.
[0071] In this case, not only the first elution time is suitable within 2 hours compared to the case of including high-order aminium ions, but also the resolution of the case of using the primary amine is improved, and in addition, the elution between lutetium and ytterbium is remarkably distinguished, and it is more advantageous because the elution time is short.
[0072] In a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the concentration of the chelating agent in the first eluent may be 0.01 to 0.5M, and the concentration of the aminium ions may be 0.01M to 1.0M.
[0073] If the concentration of the chelating agent and aminium ions is less than 0.01M, there may be a problem in that the elution time becomes longer, and conversely, if the concentration is more than 0.5M, there may be a problem in that it is difficult to separate lutetium-177 from ytterbium because the elution time is rapidly shortened.
[0074] In addition, preferably, the chelating agent may be a compound of C.sub.2 to C.sub.12 monocarboxylic acid, dicarboxylic acid, tricarboxylic acid or tetracarboxylic acid which further includes a hydrophilic functional group other than a carboxyl group, or a salt thereof.
[0075] For example, the chelating agent may be one selected from 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid (2-HIBA), 3-hydroxybutyric acid (3-HIBA), 3-hydroxypropanoic acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, citric acid and glycolic acid.
[0076] More preferably, the chelating agent may be 2-HIBA. When 2-HIBA is used as a chelating agent, there is an advantage in that it may be easily separated and removed compared to other compounds due to the good formation of a weak chelate with metal ions in the structure.
[0077] In addition, the cation exchange resin is a stationary phase of the separation column and the purification column, and the type of the resin may be the same or different in the separation column and the purification column.
[0078] The cation exchange resin may include at least one selected from a sulfate group (SO.sub.3H), a phosphate group (OP(O)(OH).sub.2 or P(O)(OH).sub.2) and a carboxyl group (C(O)OH).
[0079] In addition, for the cation exchange resin, it is preferable to use a resin including at least one selected from the sulfate group, phosphate group and carboxyl group with a polymer, an inorganic substance or a mixture of a polymer and an inorganic substance as a support.
[0080] More preferably, the cation exchange resin may be at least one selected from resins of materials having a sulfate group in the form of polymers. However, the present invention is not necessarily limited thereto, and a suitable one may be selected from the cation exchange resins generally used in the art according to the polarity, pH, and separation conditions of an eluent.
[0081] In addition, the separation method of the present invention is characterized in that the separation column is saturated with an eluent before injecting the eluent. By including an eluent in the separation column in advance, there is an advantage in that the separation may be easily performed even with a single eluent without using an eluent having a concentration gradient. If the separation is performed without saturating with an eluent in advance, the total separation time becomes longer because the separation proceeds while the eluent flows to create equilibrium with the column, and thus, the use of an eluent having a concentration gradient is forced.
[0082] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention, lutetium may be eluted first in the separation column, and then ytterbium may be eluted.
[0083] In addition, the eluted lutetium may be introduced into a purification column using the eluted solution itself as an eluent. Subsequently, the eluted ytterbium may be purified by a separate column different from the purification column.
[0084]
[0085] In a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a mixture of lutetium and ytterbium to be introduced into the separation column is dissolved with hydrochloric acid or nitric acid to form a M.sup.3+(Cl.sup.?).sub.3 or M.sup.3(NO.sub.3.sup.?).sub.3 compound, and then heated to remove excess acid, and it may be in the form of dissolving the same in water.
[0086] However, the form of the mixture to be introduced into the column may be selected within the range of a level that may be substituted or changed by exerting ordinary creativity in the generally used method and the conventional method.
[0087] In addition, lutetium-177 which is purified through a purification column may be obtained in the form of a required compound using the conventional method, and this method is within the scope of practice by those skilled in the art.
[0088] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples. However, it should be understood that the scope of the technical spirit of the present invention is not limited to the following examples, and the contents disclosed in the examples are only illustrative so that the present invention can be understood more specifically.
EXAMPLE
Comparative Example 1
[0089] An aqueous solution adjusted to pH 4.2 by adding 2-HIBA (0.07M) as a chelating agent and 25% aqueous ammonia in a separation column (a cylindrical column with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 70 mm) filled with a stationary-phase cation exchange resin containing a sulfate group was used as a first eluent, and it was injected until the column was completely saturated.
[0090] 50 mg of ytterbium oxide (Yb.sub.2O.sub.3) was irradiated with neutrons for 5 days in 1?10.sup.14 neutrons in a research reactor. The formed ytterbium oxide-lutetium mixture (Yb.sub.2O.sub.3-.sup.177Lu.sub.2O.sub.3) was dissolved in saturated hydrochloric acid (c-HCl, 11.4M) to prepare a metal chloride (MCl, the M is an arbitrary metal ion) state. Excess acid was removed by heating the prepared sample, and 1 mL of water was added to prepare an YbCl.sub.3-.sup.177LuCl.sub.3 aqueous solution.
[0091] Elution was carried out while flowing the YbCl.sup.3-.sup.177LuCl.sup.3 aqueous solution through the separation column at a rate of 1.5 mL/min.
[0092] First, the eluent including the eluted lutetium-177 compound was injected into a purification column (a cylindrical column with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 20 mm) filled with the same cation exchange resin as the separation column and saturated with water.
[0093] The purification column in which the lutetium-177 compound was collected was washed with a washing solution to remove organic and inorganic components in the eluent. Afterwards, lutetium-177 was recovered in the purification column using a recovery solution including a strong acid. The recovered solution was heated to 150? C. to remove the acid component, and then dissolved in 1 mL of 0.01M hydrochloric acid to obtain high-purity carrier-free lutetium-177.
[0094] The elution time in the separation column was 40 minutes or more.
[0095] The elution of lutetium and ytterbium was measured through a gamma-ray detector, and the chromatogram for each case is shown in
Comparative Example 2
[0096] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, but a mixture of ytterbium oxide and lutetium oxide that was not irradiated with neutrons was treated in the same manner to prepare a mixture of ytterbium chloride and lutetium chloride as a sample, and the same separation and purification processes were performed.
[0097] The eluted lutetium and ytterbium were measured using a UV detector, and the chromatogram is shown in
Example 1
[0098] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that the first eluent including methylaminium ions, which are primary aminium ions, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0099] The elution of lutetium was obtained from 77 minutes for about 20 minutes, and at 120 minutes, in order to facilitate the recovery of ytterbium, which was the target material, elution was performed by replacing with a second eluent (0.2M HIBA aqueous solution adjusted to pH 4.2 using methylaminium), which was a pH 4.2 aqueous solution including 0.2 M HIBA.
[0100] Similarly, the chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
Example 2
[0101] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that the first eluent including ethylaminium ions, which are primary aminium ions, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0102] The elution of lutetium was obtained from 70 minutes for about 20 minutes, and at 110 minutes, in order to facilitate the recovery of ytterbium, which was the target material, elution was performed by replacing with a second eluent (0.2M HIBA aqueous solution adjusted to pH 4.2 using ethylaminium) at a higher concentration than the first eluent.
[0103] Similarly, the chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
Example 3
[0104] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that the first eluent including ethanolaminium ions, which are primary aminium ions substituted with a hydroxyl group, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0105] The elution of lutetium was performed from about 120 minutes for about 24 minutes, and at 177 minutes, in order to facilitate the recovery of ytterbium, which was the target material, elution was performed with a second eluent (0.2M HIBA aqueous solution adjusted to pH 4.2 using ethanolaminium) at a higher concentration than the first eluent.
[0106] Similarly, a chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
Example 4
[0107] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that the first eluent including diethyl aminium ions, which are secondary aminium ions, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0108] As a result of the elution, lutetium was not eluted for 4 hours or more.
[0109] As a result of eluting with a second eluent (0.2 M HIBA aqueous solution adjusted to pH 4.2 using diethylaminium), lutetium started to be eluted at 70 minutes, but it was confirmed that it was eluted by being mixed with ytterbium.
[0110] The chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
Example 5
[0111] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that the first eluent including ethylenediamine ions, which are primary aminium ions substituted with an amino group, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0112] As a result of eluting with the first eluent, lutetium and ytterbium were separated within 15 minutes. Ytterbium was also detected in some lutetium fractions during re-experiment.
[0113] The chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
Example 6
[0114] It was carried out in the same manner as in Comparative Example 2, except that a silica support was used as a cation exchange resin, and the first eluent including methylaminium ions, which are primary aminium ions, at the same concentration was used instead of aqueous ammonia.
[0115] As a result of eluting with the first eluent, it was confirmed that lutetium was eluted 4 minutes after the elution, and eluted over about 7 minutes. As a result of confirming the metal component of the separated eluent, some ytterbium was also confirmed.
[0116] The chromatogram obtained through the same detector is shown in
[0117] Table 1 below shows the elution times of lutetium and ytterbium, respectively, when elution was performed by the methods according to the examples and comparative examples.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Start of Lu End of Lu Elution time Start of Yb elution elution interval elution Classification (minute) (minute) (minute) (minute) Remark Comparative 45 65 6 71 Example 1 Comparative 47 68 6 74 Example 2 Example 1 77 98 20 118 Example 2 70 87 20 107 Example 3 118 143 34 177 Example 4 No elution for 4 hours or more Example 5 3 7 1 8 Lu and Yb were eluted almost at the same time Example 6 4 11 0 4
[0118] As can be confirmed in Table 1 above, in the separation methods according to Examples 1 to 3 using primary aminium or hydroxy-substituted primary aminium ions in the eluents instead of ammonium ions, the elution time was slightly longer, but it was confirmed that the separation clearly occurred by having a significant time interval between lutetium and ytterbium. In Example 4, the resolution was further improved by using secondary aminium ions, but instead, there was a disadvantage in that the elution time was increased by nearly two times.
[0119] In Example 5, it was found that by using aminium ions having two amino groups, the resolution was rather poor compared to the ammonium ions.
[0120] In Example 6, it was confirmed that the resolution was rather reduced as a result of using the silica support for the stationary phase.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
[0121] According to the method for separating lutetium-177 of the present invention, it is possible to produce carrier-free lutetium-177 due to the improved resolution without using a gradient eluent. Accordingly, it is possible to achieve the effects of reducing the amount of expensive cation exchange resins used and the amount of waste generated, and the carrier-free lutetium-177 can be separated within a short period of time.
[0122] In addition, since the eluent without a concentration gradient is used, there is an advantage in that the eluent can be recycled, and the separation and purification processes can be simplified.