Ball and socket wireless power transfer systems
11502543 · 2022-11-15
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
H01F27/42
ELECTRICITY
H01F38/00
ELECTRICITY
H02J50/90
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Methods, apparatuses, and systems for wireless power transfer (WPT) in ball-and-socket type structures are provided. A ball and ball-socket structure can include conductive windings and conductive plates having a variety of shapes to optimize WPT over different angles as the ball moves or rotates within the ball-socket. One or both of capacitive coupling and inductive coupling can be incorporated.
Claims
1. An apparatus for wireless power transfer comprising: a ball including a first conductive winding; a ball-socket disposed around the ball such that the ball is irremovably disposed within the ball-socket, the ball-socket including a second conductive winding; a ball rod connected to the ball; and a socket rod connected to the ball-socket, wherein the first conductive winding is electrically isolated from the second conductive winding, wherein the first conductive winding extends within the ball rod connected to the ball, and wherein the first conductive winding and the second conductive winding form opposing complete hemispheres.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the ball-socket comprises a ledge extending outwardly therefrom in a direction perpendicular to a direction in which the socket rod extends away from the ball-socket.
3. An apparatus for wireless power transfer comprising: a ball including a first conductive plate; and a ball-socket disposed around the ball such that the ball is irremovably disposed within the ball-socket, the ball-socket including a second conductive plate; a ball rod connected to the ball; and a socket rod connected to the ball-socket, wherein the first conductive plate is electrically isolated from the second conductive plate, wherein the first conductive plate extends within the ball rod connected to the ball, and wherein the first conductive plate and the second conductive plate form opposing complete hemispheres.
4. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the ball-socket comprises a ledge extending outwardly therefrom in a direction perpendicular to a direction in which the socket rod extends away from the ball-socket.
5. A method for wireless power transfer comprising: acquiring or fabricating an apparatus according to claim 1; and applying alternating current to either the first conductive winding or the second conductive winding to transfer power via inductive coupling or magnetic resonance.
6. A method for wireless power transfer comprising: acquiring or fabricating an apparatus according to claim 3; and applying alternating current to either the first conductive winding or the second conductive winding to transfer power via inductive coupling or magnetic resonance.
7. A method for wireless power transfer comprising: acquiring or fabricating an apparatus according to claim 1; and transferring power via capacitive coupling.
8. A method for wireless power transfer comprising: acquiring or fabricating an apparatus according to claim 3; and transferring power via capacitive coupling.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(25) Embodiments of the present invention include WPT methods, apparatuses, and systems that can applied to ball-and-socket joints. Embodiments of the present can incorporate magnetic induction, magnetic resonance, and capacitive coupling.
(26) The prior art teaches some techniques for applying WPT to mechanical structures. For example, a mechanical slip-ring 10 with primary 1 and secondary 2 windings on the fixed 3 and rotating parts 4 is shown in
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32) According to an embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus for wireless power transfer can include a ball including a first conductive winding and a ball-socket including a second conductive winding. The first conductive winding should be electrically isolated from the second conductive winding.
(33) The first conductive winding and the second conductive winding can each take the shape of one or more parts of a surface of a sphere. For example, the first conductive winding and second conductive winding can each take the shape of a hemisphere, part of a hemisphere, a band formed along a sphere, two bands formed along a sphere, three (or four, five, or six . . . ) bands formed along a sphere, a sphere cap and one or more bands, two or more concentric spherical bands, and concentric hemispheres.
(34) A sphere can be defined has having a top (away from the socket opening or towards the rod) at 90 degrees and a bottom at −90 degrees, wherein the equatorial line is 0 degrees. Each of the bands or parts of the sphere can span a range having any of the following values as endpoints (with or without “about” in front of one or both of the endpoints), though embodiments are not limited thereto (all numerical values are in degrees): 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, −5, −10, −15, −20, −25, −30, −35, −40, −45, −50, −55, −60, −65, −70, −75, −80, −85, and −90. For example, a winding in the shape of a hemisphere can range from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. In a second example, a winding can take the shape of a band on the surface of a sphere extending from 15 to −15 degrees. In a third example, a first band extending from 15 to −15 degrees and having a first radius can be placed within a second band extending from 15 to −15 degrees and having a second radius, which is greater than the first radius. In a fourth example, a winding can include a hemispherical cap extending from 90 to 60 degrees in combination with a band extending from 10 degrees to −10 degrees. In a fifth example, a winding can have a first band extending from 30 degrees to 40 degrees and a second band extending from 10 to 20 degrees.
(35) The windings of the ball-socket can be included partially or completely within a ledge of the ball-socket. The winding of the ball and the ball-socket can take the form of complete or partial opposing hemispheres (see
(36) When the ball structure rotates, the axis of the ball winding and the ball-socket winding can point in different directions. One example of this is shown in
(37) An investigation will now be had into the scientific principles that underlie the present invention. Certain assumptions will be made to simplify the analysis, such as apparatus dimensions and angular restrictions. However, these assumptions are only made for simplifying the experimental investigation, and it should be clear that embodiments of the present invention are in no way limited by these assumptions.
(38)
P∝fMI.sub.Tx.sup.2 (1)
where M is the mutual inductance between Tx and Rx coils, f is the operating frequency of the AC source, and I.sub.T, is the current of the Tx coil excitation. The currents and voltages in the system can be calculated by the following equation:
(39)
where R.sub.Tx is the total serial resistance of the transmitter circuit, X.sub.TX is the total serial reactance of the transmitter circuit and is equal to
(40)
if the compensating capacitor is serially connected as illustrated in
(41)
(42) A first conductive plate (which can have multiple distinct parts) can be located in the ball, and a second conductive plate (which can have multiple distinct parts) can be located in the ball-socket. The first conductive plate and the second conductive plate can each take the shape of one or more parts of a surface of a sphere. For example, the first conductive plate and second conductive plate can each take the shape of the surface of a hemisphere, part of a hemisphere, a band formed along a sphere, two bands formed along a sphere, three (or four, five, or six . . . ) bands formed along a sphere, a sphere cap and one or more bands, two or more concentric spherical bands, and concentric hemispheres.
(43) A sphere can be defined has having a top (away from the socket opening or towards the rod) at 90 degrees and a bottom at −90 degrees, wherein the equatorial line is at 0 degrees. Each of the bands or parts on the surface of the sphere can span a range of angles, for example, having any of the following values as endpoints (with or without “about” in front of one or both of the endpoints), though embodiments are not limited thereto (all numerical values are in degrees): 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, −5, −10, −15, −20, −25, −30, −35, −40, −45, −50, −55, −60, −65, −70, −75, −80, −85, and −90. For example, a plate in the shape of a hemisphere surface can range from 0 to 90 degrees. In a second example, a plate can take the shape of a band on the surface of a sphere extending from 15 to −15 degrees. In a third example, a first band extending from 15 to −15 degrees and having a first radius can be placed within a second band extending from 15 to −15 degrees and having a second radius, which is greater than the first radius. In a fourth example, a plate can include a hemispherical cap extending from 90 to 70 degrees in combination with a band extending from 10 degrees to 30 degrees, similar to what is shown in
(44) The plate of the ball-socket can be included partially or completely within a ledge of the ball-socket. The plate of the ball and the ball-socket can take the form of complete or partial opposing hemispheres (see
(45) The power stored via capacitance that is transferrable is:
P∝fCV.sub.Tx.sup.2, (3)
where C is the capacitance between the Tx and Rx electrodes, and V.sub.Tx is the AC voltage applied on the Tx electrodes. For planar electrodes, the capacitance can be calculated by the following equation.
(46)
In order to maximize the capacitance for capacitive WPT, the distance (d) between the conductive layer in the ball structure and that in the ball-socket structure should be as small as practically possible, and the overlap area (A) of the transmitter and receiver conductive plates should be as large as possible.
(47) Because inductance is affected by the size, shape, number of windings, and orientation, there can be significant variations in efficiency and power transfer in embodiments of the present invention that rely on IPT. Therefore, winding design should be carefully examined to minimize the fluctuation of mutual inductance between the two windings over a wide angular range. Considering the nature of ball-and-socket joints, the most practical implementation is to wind coils near the surface of both the ball structure and ball-socket structure. The symmetrical winding scheme can be defined by the parameters specified in
(48) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I PARAMETERS OF EMBEDDED COILS IN BALL AND SOCKET Parameter Symbol Unit Cross section radius of the wire ρ m Interval between two turns of wire Δt m Number of turns N Ball winding starting angle α deg Ball winding ending angle β deg Socket winding starting angle γ deg Socket winding ending angle δ deg Ball winding radius r.sub.& m Socket winding radius r.sub.s m Displacement angle between ball and socket θ deg
(49) To produce a simplified model for a basic understanding of the how different factors affect power transfer and efficiency, several assumptions have been made. First, for this investigation, the windings in the ball-socket are assumed not to cover more than a hemisphere (of course, embodiments of the present invention can include more than windings of just a hemisphere). Second, the coils are assumed to be wound symmetrically along the vertical axes, as shown in
(50) Therefore
0<α<β<180° (5)
0<γ<δ<90° (6)
0<θ<90° (7)
where the angular variables α, β, γ and δ are specified as shown in
(51) Turning to the two coils, the ball coil Cb and socket coil Cs shown in
(52)
where L.sub.m,n is the inductance between the two general coil m and coil n. Self-inductance is calculated when m=n.μ.sub.0 is the vacuum permeability if no magnetic material is used. X.sub.m and X.sub.n are infinitesimal length vectors along the coil m and n. The denominator in the integral can be approximated as zero when calculating the self-inductance and when X.sub.m≡X.sub.n. In such situations, special handling techniques are required. The following equation can be used to replace the partial element at the singularity.
(53)
Where L.sub.p is a partial inductance of one segment of coil, 1 equals the length of the discretized vector element of the wire and p is the radius of the cross section of the wire.
(54) The trajectory of the ball coil Cb and socket coil Cs can be generated and stored in vector arrays. Each segment in the array is assumed to have the same length. Thus, the value of L.sub.p is a fixed value.
C.sub.b={X.sub.b.sub.
C.sub.s={X.sub.s.sub.
(55) When the Neumann's formula (8) is applied to the setup in
(56)
(57) For the self-inductance of each coil, equation (9) is used to determine one partial inductance value when i=j. The self-inductance equation of each coil L.sub.C is the summation of all the partial inductance value:
(58)
(59) The general self-inductance equation (13) applies to both ball coil C.sub.b, and socket coil C.sub.s in
(60) With any given mechanical structure of a ball joint, the inner and outer radius is determined. Therefore the optimizable parameters are the four angular variables α, β, γ and δ. Since the equations are complicated, a genetic algorithm was used to find the optimal values of the start and end points of the coils. In order to minimize the variation of mutual inductance over a wide angular movement of the ball structure within the ball-socket, the mutual inductance values were calculated with a series of θ values. Assuming that the mutual inductance values at K different angular positions are obtained, the mean value of the mutual inductance is:
(61)
The standard deviation of these K inductance values is:
(62)
A fitness function is defined as:
(63)
The genetic algorithm that was adopted to optimize the objective function is defined as:
J(α,β,γ,δ)=max[fitness(α,β,γ,δ)] (17)
(64) Simulations and experiments were carried out to evaluate, optimize, and ultimately determine the physical structure for different embodiments of the present invention. The physical dimensions of the ball joint were determined first. It was assumed that the ball coil radius was 4 cm and the socket coil radius was 5 cm. The cross-sectional radius of the wire was assumed to be 0.75 mm thick. Theta (θ) was selected from 0 to 90°, with 5° intervals. The displacement angles selected were 0,5°,10°,15°, . . . , and 80°, as most practical ball joints will have dead zones. In this study, the windings embedded in the ball-socket were used as the transmitter coil, while the windings embedded in the ball acted as the receiver coil. The ball and ball-socket structures were fabricated using a 3D printer. The rotating angle of the ball structure in the socket was from 0° to about 90°.
(65)
(66) In
(67) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Parameters for a Set of Standard Windings Parameter Optimal value α 0 β 90° γ 0 δ 90°
(68) Based on the mutual inductance calculations explained above, the mutual inductance values over a wide range of displacement angles were calculated and plotted with the measured values as shown in the graph of
(69) A second set of windings, as shown in
(70) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE III OPTIMIZED PARAMETERS BY GENETIC ALGORITHM Parameter Optimal value α 104.4° β 167.4° γ 7.3° δ 93.6°
(71) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE IV PARAMETERS OF THE BALL JOINT Parameter Unit Value Ball coil radius cm 4 Socket coil radius cm 5 Load impedance Ohm 51 Ball coil self-inductance μH 27 Socket coil self-inductance μH 110 Operating frequency kHz 867
(72) A 3D-printed ball-and-socket structure according to the present invention was constructed. The coils were wound using a litz wire and the parameters acquired from the optimized results. Both coils were connected in series with compensating capacitors in order to form resonant tanks with resonant frequencies that were identical to the operating frequencies. The receiver at the ball side was connected with an output load 51Ω non-inductive resistor. The power source was a 10 W sinusoidal voltage generator.
(73)
(74) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE V MEASURED CURRENT, VOLTAGE AND POWER VALUES AT DIFFERENT DISPLACEMENT ANGLES θ (deg) V.sub.in (RMS, V) I.sub.in (RMS, mA) P.sub.in (mW) V.sub.out (RMS, V) I.sub.out (RMS, mA) P.sub.out (mW) P.sub.out (mW) 0 2.12 99.4 202 3.12 60.0 182 90.1% 15 2.20 97.4 213 3.16 61.0 188 88.3% 30 2.38 94.5 223 3.22 62.0 197 88.3% 45 2.53 92.0 229 3.26 63.4 202 88.2% 60 2.48 93.0 228 3.24 63.0 200 87.7% 75 2.08 101 205 3.09 60.5 182 88.8% 90 2.11 116 112 2.27 45.0 96 85.7%
(75) An LED load was used in the receiver for demonstration purposes as shown in
(76) In another proof of concept experiment, power transfer efficiency was measured for an experimental embodiment of the present invention. The measured power efficiency ranged from 87.1% to 94.4% over a variety of different angles, as can be seen in Table VI. The results recorded in Table VI were obtained using the design shown in
(77) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE VI Experimental Embodiment Power Transfer Efficiency Degree Vin (RMS) Iin (RMS) Pin Vout (RMS) Iout (RMS) Pout Eff 0 5.435 0.03165 0.16985 2.028 0.07845 0.1587 93.43% 15 5.53 0.02980 0.16263 1.988 0.07733 0.1535 94.39% 30 5.56 0.02939 0.16100 1.976 0.07692 0.1520 94.41% 45 5.57 0.02927 0.16090 1.975 0.07697 0.1510 93.85% 60 5.43 0.03230 0.17300 2.03 0.07920 0.1600 92.49% 75 4.98 0.04160 0.20364 2.18 0.08500 0.1855 91.11% 90 3.98 0.06450 0.23300 2.28 0.08900 0.2030 87.12%
(78) The subject invention includes, but is not limited to, the following exemplified embodiments. Embodiment 1. An apparatus for wireless power transfer comprising: a ball including a first conductive winding; and a ball-socket including a second conductive winding, wherein the first conductive winding is electrically isolated from the second conductive winding. Embodiment 2. The apparatus of Embodiment 1, wherein the first conductive winding takes a shape from one or more parts of a surface of a sphere [e.g., a hemisphere, part of a hemisphere, a band formed along a sphere, two bands formed along a sphere, three (or four, five, or six . . . ) bands formed along a sphere, a sphere cap and one or more bands, two or more concentric spherical bands, and concentric hemispheres]. Embodiment 3. The apparatus of any of Embodiments 1 to 2, wherein the first conductive winding is planar equatorial [e.g., a ring or band around the central axis and on the equatorial plane, a complete planar equatorial winding, or a planar equatorial winding that starts at the center of the ball and only extends partially to the surface of the ball]. Embodiment 4. The apparatus of any of Embodiments 1 to 3, wherein the first conductive winding includes an internal stack (where the windings are vertically stacked, such as that shown in
(79) It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application.
(80) All patents, patent applications, provisional applications, and publications referred to or cited herein (including those in the “References” section) are incorporated by reference in their entirety, including all figures and tables, to the cextent they are not inconsistent with the explicit teachings of this specification.
REFERENCES
(81) [1] N. Tesla, “Apparatus for transmitting electrical energy,” U.S. Pat. No. 1,119,732, Dec. 1, 1914. [2] Robert Lomas, The man who invented the twentieth century Nikola Tesla Forgotten Genius of Electricity. Headline 1999, ISBN 0 7472 6265 9, p. 146. [3] J. C. Schuder, H. E. Stephenson, and J. F. Townsend, “High level electromagnetic energy transfer through a closed chestwall,” IRE Int. Cony. Rec., pt.9, vol. 9, pp. 119-126, 1961. [4] W. H. Ko, S. P. Liang, and C. D. F. Fung, “Design of rf-powered coils for implant instruments,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 15, pp. 634-640, 1977. [5] E. Hochmair, “System optimization for improved accuracy in transcutaneous signal and power transmission”, IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-31, no. 2, pp. 177-186, February 1984. [6] B. Choi, J. Nho, H. Cha, T. Ahn and S. Choi, “Design and implementation of low-profile contactless battery charger using planar printed circuit board windings as energy transfer device,” IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 140-147, February 2004. [7] Y. Jang and M. M. Jovanovic, “A contactless electrical energy transmission system for portable-telephone battery chargers”, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 520-527, June 2003. [8] W. G. Hurley and J. Kassakian, “Induction heating of circular ferromagnetic plates”, IEEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1174-1181, July 1979. [9] A. W. Green and J. T. Boys, “10 kHz inductively coupled power transfer-concept and control”, in Proc. ICPE-VSD, 1994, pp. 694-699. [10] J. T. Boys, G. A. Covic and A. W. Green, “Stability and control of inductively coupled power transfer systems”, in Proc. Electric Power Applications, 2000, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 37-43. [11] J. T. Boys, A. P. Hu and G. A. Covic, “Critical Q analysis of a current-fed resonant converter for ICPT applications”, Electronics Letters, vol. 36, no. 17, pp. 1440-1442, 2000. [12] G. A. J. Elliott, G. A. Covic, D. Kacprzak and J. T. Boys, “A New Concept: Asymmetrical Pick-Ups for Inductively Coupled Power Transfer Monorail Systems”, IEEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 3389-3391, 2006. [13] M. L. G. Kissin, J. T. Boys and G. A. Covic, “Interphase Mutual Inductance in Polyphase Inductive Power Transfer Systems”, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2393-2400, 2009. [14] B. Choi, J. Nho, H. Cha, T. Ahn and S. Choi, “Design and implementation of low-profile contactless battery charger using planar printed circuit board windings as energy transfer device”, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 140-147, February 2004. [15] Y. Jang and M. M. Jovanovic, “A contactless electrical energy transmission system for portable-telephone battery chargers”, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 520-527, June 2003. [16] C.-G. Kim, D.-H. Seo, J.-S. You, J.-H. Park and B. H. Cho, “Design of a contactless battery charger for cellular phone”, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1238-1247, December 2001. [17] S. Y. R. Hui and W. C. Ho, “A new generation of universal contactless battery charging platform for portable Consumer Electronic equipment”, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 620-627, May 2005. [18] X. Liu and S. Y. R. Hui, “Simulation Study and Experimental Verification of a Contactless Battery Charging Platform with Localized Charging Features” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2202-2210, November 2007. [19] S. Y. R. Hui, “Planar Inductive Battery Charging System”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,576,514, 2009. [20] Wireless Power Consortium Website [online]. Available: http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com [21] Yeongrack Son and Jung-Ik Ha, “The Electric Variable Transmission without Slip Ring for the Hybrid Electric Vehicle Driving Structure”, 9th International Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE Asia, Jun. 1-5, 2015, Convention Center, Seoul, Korea [22] Pekka Eskelinen, “Experimental Rotary Transformers For Antenna Power Supplies and Control”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 52, No. 5, October 2010, 165-167