METHOD OF OPERATING AN IN SITU FITTING SYSTEM AND AN IN SITU FITTING SYSTEM

Abstract

A method (100) of operating an in situ fitting system adapted to provide improved user satisfaction with a hearing aid system and an in situ fitting system (200).

Claims

1. A method of operating an in situ fitting system adapted for adjusting a hearing aid parameter setting of a hearing aid system in response to a trigger event indicating that a first hearing aid system setting is not satisfactory, wherein the adjustment of the hearing aid parameter setting is carried out through the steps of: providing at least one server interconnected with said hearing aid system; providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings; using said at least one server to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings; selecting a cluster and a specific hearing aid parameter setting associated with said selected cluster among said at least one clusters in response to said trigger event being provided to said server, and transmitting said specific hearing aid parameter setting to said hearing aid system, and replacing said first hearing aid parameter setting with said specific hearing aid parameter setting associated with said selected cluster.

2. The method according to claim 1 comprising the further step of: identifying a present sound environment in response to said trigger event; and wherein the steps of: providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, and using said at least one server to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings; only includes settings that has been associated with the identified sound environment.

3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the step of: identifying a present sound environment in response to said trigger event comprises the further steps of at least one of: enabling a hearing aid user to select the present sound environment using a Graphical User Interface accommodated in the hearing aid system; using a sound environment classifier accommodated in the hearing aid system to select the present sound environment; using a geographical locator accommodated in the hearing aid system to select the present sound environment; and using information concerning the relative positioning of predetermined relatives.

4. The method according to claim 3 wherein said step of enabling a hearing aid user to select the present sound environment using a Graphical User Interface accommodated in the hearing aid system, comprises selecting from a group of sound environments each defined by the activity of the hearing aid user, and wherein said group of activities comprises watching television, being in a quiet environment, being at a smaller or larger party, shopping, eating, social interaction, being physically active, being transported, being outdoors and watching a show or movie.

5. The method according to claim 3 wherein the step of identifying a present sound environment in response to said trigger event comprises the further step of enabling a hearing aid user to select, from a group of goals, at least one specific goal to achieve in the present sound environment by using a Graphical User Interface accommodated in the hearing aid system, wherein said group of goals comprises: suppress noise, improve concentration, enhance sound experience, enhance music quality, improve conversation quality and improve relaxation.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein said first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings have been evaluated and preferred by a multitude of hearing aid system users.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings comprises the further steps of: providing to said at least one server a data set of subjective perceptual evaluations of a third multitude of hearing aid parameter settings; using said data set to train a probability distribution of internal response functions; generating a first multitude of synthetic internal response functions, from said probability distribution of internal response functions, and using the first multitude of synthetic internal response functions to provide said first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings by determining, for each of said first multitude of synthetic internal response functions the hearing aid parameter setting that maximizes the synthetic internal response function, and wherein said data set is provided by a multitude of different hearing aid system users.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said subjective perceptual evaluations used is selected from a group comprising at least one of: rating a single hearing aid parameter setting, comparing two different hearing aid parameter settings and rating them comparatively, and comparing two different hearing aid parameter settings and selecting one of the two.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the step of: using said data set to train a probability distribution of internal response functions, is carried out using at least one of a Gaussian Process and a Generalized linear model.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of: using said at least one server to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, is carried out using a clustering algorithm selected from a group of clustering algorithms comprising density models and centroid models.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings only includes preferred hearing aid parameter settings based on hearing aid system users with at least one of: similar audiograms, similar age, same sex and similar cognitive ability.

12. An in situ fitting system adapted for adjusting a hearing aid parameter setting of a hearing aid system in response to a trigger event indicating that a first hearing aid system setting is not satisfactory, wherein the adjustment of the hearing aid parameter setting is carried out through the steps according to claim 1.

13. A hearing aid system forming part of the in-situ fitting system according to claim 12.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] By way of example, there is shown and described a preferred embodiment of this invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other embodiments, and its several details are capable of modification in various, obvious aspects all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and descriptions will be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive. In the drawings:

[0025] FIG. 1 illustrates highly schematically a method of operating an in situ fitting system according to an embodiment of the invention, and

[0026] FIG. 2 illustrates highly schematically an in situ fitting system according to an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0027] According to an aspect of the invention it has been found that it provides a significant improvement for the user if the hearing aid system settings can be adapted to the user's current preferences (i.e. personalized). This is even more so because the user's preferences may vary significantly up to several times during a day, as a function of e.g. the time of day (morning, afternoon or evening) or the user's mood or the type of activity the user is engaged in.

[0028] As a consequence of these varying preferences of many users it provides a significant improvement for the user if the personalization can be carried out without having to spend too much time optimizing the settings.

[0029] Furthermore, it has been found that it is of significant importance that the personalization (i.e. the optimization of a hearing aid parameter setting) can be carried out without requiring the user to interact with the hearing aid system in a complex manner.

[0030] Reference is first made to FIG. 1 which illustrates highly schematically a method 100 of operating an in situ fitting system according to a first embodiment of the invention, with the purpose of adapting the in situ fitting system for adjusting a hearing aid parameter setting of a hearing aid system in response to a trigger event indicating that a first hearing aid system setting is not satisfactory.

[0031] According to a first step 101 at least one server interconnected with said hearing aid system is provided.

[0032] In variations a hearing aid or an external device of the hearing aid system is connected directly to the server using a wireless link to the internet, based on e.g. the 3G, 4G or upcoming 5G broadband cellular network technology. Alternatively, an external device such as a smart phone of the hearing aid system may be used as gateway for the hearing aid, all of which will be well known for the skilled person. In the following the terms server and internet server may be used interchangeably.

[0033] According to a second step 102 a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings is provided to said at least one server. Thus in the present context a hearing aid parameter setting represents a set of selected values one for each of a corresponding set of parameters. According to a variation the provided hearing aid parameter settings only represents a sub-set of all the parameters required to operate the hearing aid system.

[0034] According to a specific advantageous variation of the present invention, the parameters, whose selected (i.e. preferred) values are provided to said at least one server, have been carefully selected due to their ability to represent general trends for all hearing aid system users. One example of such a set of parameters represent additional gains to be added or subtracted in a set of frequency bands (i.e. these gains may also be denoted fine adjustment gains). In more specific variations the number of frequency bands is three or four. However, more frequency bands such as between 10 and 20 may also be considered based on both the available processing power and the number of preferred settings.

[0035] Basically any type of hearing aid parameter is suitable for being adjusted in accordance with this method, thus e.g. noise reduction algorithms, beam forming algorithms, and compressor settings may be improved.

[0036] In variations the multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings may be obtained using the optimization method disclosed in WO-A1-2016004983 with the title Method of optimizing parameters in a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system and by the same applicant and which is hereby incorporated by reference. More specifically reference is given to page 20, lines 15-27, which describes criteria for considering a hearing aid parameter setting to be preferred.

[0037] According to a third step 103 said at least one server is used to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings.

[0038] According to a fourth step 104 a cluster and a specific hearing aid parameter setting associated with said selected cluster among said at least one clusters is selected in response to said trigger event being provided to said server.

[0039] According to variations the specific hearing aid parameter setting is determined from a group comprising a mean, a centroid and a median of the selected cluster, as will be well known for the skilled person.

[0040] According to a fifth step 105 said specific hearing aid parameter setting is transmitted to said hearing aid system.

[0041] According to a sixth and final step 106 said first hearing aid parameter setting is replaced with said specific hearing aid parameter setting associated with said selected cluster.

[0042] In a specific variation the method 100 comprises the further steps of: [0043] identifying a present sound environment in response to said trigger event, and wherein the method steps of: providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, and using said at least one server to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings
only includes settings that has been associated with the identified sound environment.

[0044] Hereby an even better chance of providing a satisfactory hearing aid system setting in the current sound environment is provided.

[0045] In further specific variations the identification of the present sound environment is carried out by: [0046] enabling a hearing aid user select the present sound environment using a Graphical User Interface (GUI) accommodated in the hearing aid system or by [0047] using a sound environment classifier accommodated in the hearing aid system to select the present sound environment, which is advantageous in that it provides a highly reproducible sound environment classification.
or by: [0048] using a geographical locator accommodated in the hearing aid system to select the present sound environment, which is advantageous in that it also provides a sound environment identification that is highly reproducible and additionally a classification that generally is easily recognizable by the user.
or by: [0049] using information concerning the relative positioning of predetermined relatives, friends or other persons important for the hearing aid system user, which is advantageous in providing the opportunity of taking speaker characteristics of a few assumed preferred speakers into account when making the adjustment of the hearing aid parameter setting. More specifically relative positioning of predetermined persons may be achieved by localization of internet enabled devices associated with said persons.

[0050] According to a more specific embodiment the step of enabling a hearing aid user to select the present sound environment using a Graphical User Interface accommodated in the hearing aid system, comprises selecting from a group of sound environments each defined by the activity of the hearing aid user, and wherein said group of activities comprises watching television, being in a quiet environment, being at a smaller or larger party, shopping, eating, social interaction, being physically active, being transported, being outdoors and watching a show or movie.

[0051] According to an even more specific embodiment at least three or at least five of the above mentioned activities are included in the group that the user can select from.

[0052] According to another more specific embodiment the hearing aid user himself may create and name his own sound environment. This may especially be advantageous in the present context if other users also create a personal sound environment with the same or a similar name. Furthermore, such a user defined sound environment may be included among the options available for selection by other users dependent on the number of users that have chosen to define a sound environment with the same or a similar name. In this manner the sound environments offered for the hearing aid user to choose from may change over time based on input from the other hearing aid users.

[0053] According to another embodiment the step of identifying a present sound environment in response to said trigger event comprises the further step of enabling a hearing aid user to select, from a group of goals, at least one specific goal to achieve in the present sound environment by using a Graphical User Interface accommodated in the hearing aid system, wherein said group of goals comprises: suppress noise, improve concentration, enhance sound experience, enhance music quality, improve conversation quality and improve relaxation.

[0054] According to an even more specific embodiment at least two or at least four of the above mentioned goals to achieve are included in the group of goals that the user can select from.

[0055] Similar to what has already been described above, the hearing aid user may create and name her own goal to achieve within a given sound environment.

[0056] In this manner the group of goals that the hearing aid user can choose from may change over time based on input from the other hearing aid users.

[0057] In another variation said first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings have been evaluated and preferred by a multitude of hearing aid system users, which is advantageous in that the available amount of data is increased and hereby the quality of the suggested new hearing aid parameter settings are likewise expected to improve.

[0058] In another variation the step of providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings comprises the further steps of [0059] providing to said at least one server a data set of subjective perceptual evaluations of a third multitude of hearing aid parameter settings, and [0060] using said data set to train a probability distribution of internal response functions, and [0061] generating a first multitude of synthetic internal response functions, from said probability distribution of internal response functions, and [0062] using the first multitude of synthetic internal response functions to provide said first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings by determining, for each of said first multitude of synthetic internal response functions the hearing aid parameter setting that maximizes the synthetic internal response function, and wherein said data set is provided by a multitude of different hearing aid system users.

[0063] By training the probability distribution of internal response functions using all subjective perceptual evaluations carried out by a multitude of different hearing aid system users an improved result may be obtained compared to the case where the data set of subjective perceptual evaluations only is provided by a single hearing aid system user.

[0064] In more specific variations said subjective perceptual evaluations may be carried out in a multitude of different ways, including at least one of [0065] rating a single hearing aid parameter setting, [0066] comparing two different hearing aid parameter settings and selecting one of the two, and [0067] comparing two different hearing aid parameter settings and rating them comparatively.

[0068] Especially the latter type of evaluation is advantageous since it provides most information for training the probability function of internal response functions.

[0069] In other more specific variations the step of using the data set to train a probability distribution of internal response functions, is carried out using a method selected from a group comprising at least one of a Gaussian Process, and a Generalized linear model.

[0070] The Gaussian Process is especially advantageous because it is processing efficient.

[0071] According to a more specific variation said step of using the data set to train a probability distribution of internal response functions may be carried out e.g. as disclosed in WO-A1-2016004983 with the title Method of optimizing parameters in a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system and by the same applicant and which is hereby incorporated by reference. More specifically reference may be given to the disclosure contained from page 14, line 1 and to page 15, line 2.

[0072] In still other more specific variations the step of using said at least one server to provide at least one cluster representing a second multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, is carried out using a clustering algorithm selected from a group of clustering algorithms comprising density models, such as High Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) and centroid models such as Gaussian Mixture Models.

[0073] In another variation the step of providing to said at least one server a first multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings includes only preferred hearing aid parameter settings based on hearing aid system users with at least one of: similar audiograms, similar age, same sex and similar cognitive ability. It is well known within the art of hearing aid systems to group similar audiograms (which in the following may also be denoted hearing losses) e.g. in groups like mild, severe and profound hearing loss or in groups like high frequency loss or low frequency loss or combinations of the two types of groups. It will likewise be well known for the skilled person how to evaluate and determine the cognitive ability of users.

[0074] According to variations the trigger event is selected from a group comprising: [0075] activating of a hearing aid system handle adapted to provide an indication that the current hearing aid parameter setting is not satisfactory, [0076] detection that the current hearing aid parameter setting is too far from a cluster representing a multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, and [0077] detection that the cognitive stress experienced by the hearing aid system user is above a given threshold.

[0078] According to more specific variations the handle is a button accommodated in a hearing aid of the hearing aid system or a handle implemented in a GUI of an external device, typically a smart phone, of the hearing aid system.

[0079] Reference is now made to FIG. 2, which illustrates highly schematically an in situ fitting system 200 according to a second embodiment of the invention.

[0080] The in situ fitting system 200 comprises a hearing aid system 201 consisting of a left hearing aid 202-a and a right hearing aid 202-b and an external device, in the form of a smart phone 203 with a specific software application installed. Furthermore the in situ fitting system 200 comprises an internet server 204 that is adapted to receive, over the internet, a multitude of preferred hearing aid parameter settings, and adapted to transmit a specific hearing aid parameter setting to said hearing aid system 201 in response to a trigger event.

[0081] In obvious variations the hearing aid system may consist of a single hearing aid (a so called monaural fitting) or may consist of both a left and a right hearing aid (a so called binaural fitting) and furthermore the hearing aid system may (or may not) include an external device 203.

[0082] According to a further variation of the present invention an improved method of optimizing parameters in a hearing aid system may be obtained by carrying out the steps of [0083] providing a set of hearing aid parameters to be optimized; [0084] providing, from a multitude of different users, a multitude of subjective perceptual evaluations of a multitude of test sounds each based on a given hearing aid parameter setting; [0085] providing a data set of said multitude of subjective perceptual evaluations to at least one server; [0086] using said data set to train a first probability distribution of internal response functions; [0087] using said first probability distribution of internal response functions to provide a prior distribution over the function values of a specific user's internal response function; [0088] providing, from said specific user, a multitude of subjective perceptual evaluations of a multitude of test sounds defined by said set of hearing aid parameters to be optimized; [0089] using Bayes rule to obtain a posterior distribution over the function values of the specific user's internal response function; [0090] providing a predictive distribution based on the posterior distribution over the function values of the specific user's internal response function; and [0091] using the predictive distribution to find a hearing aid parameter value setting that the specific user prefers.

[0092] It is noted that the present invention does not require the use of probabilistic methods, although these are preferred because they are more efficient than parametric methods.

[0093] It is likewise noted that the present invention is independent on whether the parameters to be optimized are used to control how sound is processed in the hearing aid system or whether they are used to control how sound is synthetically generated by the hearing aid system.

[0094] The present invention is also independent on how the hearing aid system parameters are provided or offered or selected for optimization.

[0095] Generally, disclosed variations may be combined with all other disclosed variations.