PICKLE FOR POLYAMIDE

Abstract

Process for pickling polyamide, comprising the steps a) contacting the polyamide with a pickling solution comprising a mixture of at least two inorganic acids MHF.sub.2, where M is an alkali ion or an ammonium ion a monocarboxylic acid with 1 to 5 carbon atoms b) contacting with an organic solvent having 1 to 10 carbon atoms, wherein steps a) and b) take place consecutively or simultaneously.

Claims

1. A process for pickling polyamide, comprising the steps a) contacting the polyamide with a pickling solution comprising a mixture of at least two inorganic acids MHF.sub.2, where M is an alkali ion or an ammonium ion. a monocarboxylic acid with 1 to 5 carbon atoms b) contacting with an organic solvent having 1 to 10 carbon atoms, wherein steps a) and b) take place consecutively or simultaneously.

2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the inorganic acids are hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the organic solvent is selected from n-butanol, isobutanol, t-butanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, a glycol ether or mixtures thereof.

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the MHF.sub.2 is NaHF.sub.2, KHF.sub.2, or a mixture thereof.

5. The process of claim 1, wherein the monocarboxylic acid is methanoic acid, ethanoic acid, propanoic acid, or a mixture thereof.

6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the concentrations in the pickling solution are mixtures of inorganic acids 1 to 5 mol/l MHF.sub.2 10 to 60 g/l monocarboxylic acid 50 to 300 g/l.

7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the contacting is carried out at 20 to 50? C.

8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the contacting is performed for 3 to 15 minutes.

9. The process according to claim 1, wherein at least one rinsing step is used.

10. The process according to claim 1, followed by a step comprising a catalyst.

11. The process of claim 10, followed by a step of electroless nickel plating.

12. A pickling solution comprising a mixture of at least two inorganic acids MHF.sub.2, where M is an alkali ion or an ammonium ion a monocarboxylic acid with 1 to 5 C atoms.

13. The pickling solution according to claim 12, additionally containing an organic solvent with 1 to 5 C atoms.

14. The pickling solution according to claim 12, wherein the concentrations in the pickling solution are mixtures of inorganic acids 1 to 5 mol/l MHF.sub.2 10 to 60 g/l monocarboxylic acid 50 to 300 g/l.

15. The pickling solution according to claim 12, wherein the inorganic acids are selected from the group consisting of hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid and nitric acid.

16. The pickling solution according to claim 12, wherein the inorganic acids comprise hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid.

17. (canceled)

18. The process according to claim 1, wherein the inorganic acids are hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid.

19. The process according to claim 3, wherein the glycol ether comprises 1-methoxy-2-propanol, 2-butoxyethan-1-ol, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, or mixtures thereof.

20. The process according to claim 6 wherein the concentrations in the pickling solution further comprise organic solvent 30 to 100 g/l.

21. The pickling solution according to claim 14 wherein the concentrations in the pickling solution further comprise organic solvent 30 to 100 g/l.

Description

[0049] FIG. 1 is an SEM image of Example 1 according to the invention.

[0050] FIG. 2 is an SEM image of the comparative example.

[0051] The invention is explained in more detail by the present examples:

EXAMPLE 1: PICKLING

[0052] A component was treated with a pickling solution with the following composition [0053] HCl 37%-ig: 150 ml/L [0054] H.sub.3PO.sub.4 85%-ig: 100 ml/L [0055] 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol: 50 ml/L [0056] Ammonium bifluoride: 35 g/L [0057] Formic acid: 100 ml/L [0058] Rest: water [0059] pickled for 5 minutes at 40? C.

[0060] The pickled polyamide was a PA6M40 specimen of size 3 dm.sup.2.

[0061] As a comparison, the identical polyamide was pickled with a commercial chromium(VI) pickle (CrO.sub.3 380 g/l, H.sub.2SO.sub.4 380 g/l).

[0062] Two SEM images of the example according to the invention and the comparative example are shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.

[0063] It can be seen that the surface structure is attacked differently. A qualitative difference is practically not assessable at this level.

EXAMPLE 2: FLUSHING AND ACTIVATION

[0064] The surfaces were first rinsed at 35? C. for 5 minutes with air agitation and then cold at room temperature for 2 minutes with no agitation and no wetting agent added, and activated with a catalyst containing palladium at a concentration of 40 mg/L palladium at 40? C. for 4 minutes. The amount of deposited palladium was then measured at the surface. It was >0.3 mg/dm.sup.2 for the polyamide etched according to the invention and 0.3 mg/dm.sup.2 for the comparative product. A higher loading of palladium facilitates the electroless deposition of further layers.

EXAMPLE 3: ELECTROLESS DEPOSITION

[0065] In the next step, the products thus obtained were coated using a nickel solution depositing without external current.

EXAMPLE 4: ANALYSES

[0066] In a pull-off test according to DIN 53494, a pull-off strength of >15 N/cm could be achieved with the product according to the invention, and 8 N/cm with the comparative product. Determining the pull-off force of the metal layer of a galvanized plastic part according to this standard enables a comparative assessment of processes and investigations into the influence of process parameters on test specimens with smooth, flat surfaces. The peel force within the meaning of the standard is the force in N required to peel off a 25 mm wide strip of a 40 ?m thick copper layer perpendicular to the specimen surface.

[0067] A product obtained from the ATO company was used as another comparative product.

[0068] Processing with [0069] 400 ml/l PA Sweller Concentrate and 130 ml/l PA Conditioner at 40? C.5 min. [0070] Rinse at 40? C.8 minutes [0071] then cold rinsed for 2?4 minutes

[0072] The remaining steps were identical. Here, only a nickel layer with a peel strength of 6.9 N/cm could be achieved.

[0073] The present results show that, despite the use of environmentally friendly, chromium-free stains, adhesion levels superior to the state of the art are achieved.

EXAMPLE 5: VARIATION OF THE SOLVENT

[0074] The type of solvent was varied as indicated below.

[0075] The surface energy was measured in accordance with the determination of the free surface energy of solid surfaces by measuring the contact angle according to DIN 55660-2. Kr?ss Advance software was used.

TABLE-US-00001 Free Surface energy Dispersive polar Solvent in mN/m mN/m mN/m Isopropanol 75.71 46.07 29.64 1-Methoxy-2-propanol 63.62 42.7 20.92 2-Butoxyethan-1-ol 72.89 45.95 26.93 2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethanol 70.8 44.81 25.98 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol 59.58 42.25 17.32 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether 64.77 47.78 16.98

[0076] Subsequently, rinsing, activation and subsequent deposition were carried out as above. After activation, palladium incorporation was measured, and after deposition, adhesion was monitored over a period of time. Finally, a shock test (100? C. for 1 h, followed by quenching) was performed with up to three repetitions with a visual assessment.

TABLE-US-00002 Adhesion Adhesion Adhesion Pd measurement 1 measurement 2 Measurement 3 Shock incorporation Solvent [N/cm] [N/cm] [N/cm] test in mg/dm.sup.2 Isopropanol 24.24 (3 d) 19.97 (8 d) 26.48 (13 d) After 0.383 3rd round i.o. 1-Methoxy-2- 16.46 (2 d) 14.2 (7 d) 18.8 (12 d) Failure 0.405 propanol after the 2nd round (bubbles back) 2-Butoxyethan-1-ol 22.26 (2 d) 21.18 (7 d) 24.37 (12 d) After 0.388 3rd round i.o. 2-(2- 23.73 (1 d) 20.19 (6 d) 20.81 (11 d) After 0.39 Butoxy-ethoxy)- 3rd ethanol round i.o. 2-(2- 27.07 (1 d) 19.91 (6 d) 21.49 (11 d) After 0.408 Methoxyethoxy)- 3rd ethanol round i.o. Dipropylene 13.7 (1 d) 11.44 (4 d) 13.01 (7 d) Failure 0.47 glycol- after methyl ether the 2. Round, blister at the Contact point

[0077] The shock test shows differences in the stability of the coating; depending on the application it is not necessary to pass repetitions to be suitable for the application.

EXAMPLE 6: RELEVANCE OF THE COMPONENTS

[0078] These experiments were performed using 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol as solvent.

TABLE-US-00003 Surface free energy dispersive polar Designation in mN/m mN/m mN/m without HCl 47.42 40.09 7.33 without H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 59.76 44.55 15.22 without CH O.sub.22 55.32 40.09 15.24 Without LM 55.56 44.23 11.33 without NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 66.63 45.74 20.89

[0079] As in Example 5, further analysis was performed:

TABLE-US-00004 Adhesion Adhesion Adhesion Pd measurement 1 measurement 2 measurement 3 Shock installation Designation [N/cm] [N/cm] [N/cm] test in mg/dm.sup.2 without HCl 1.65 (1 d) 2.74 (3 d) 4.51 (7 d) Failure 0.361 after the 1st round without H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 8.56 (1 d) 9.18 (3 d) 10.21 (7 d) Failure 0.45 after the 2nd round without CH O.sub.22 3.84 (0 d) 7.85 (2 d) 10.12 (7 d) Failure 0.43 after the 2nd round Without LM 6.13 (0 d) 10.43 (2 d) 13.99 (7 d) After 0.36 3rd round i.o. without NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 0.15 (1 d) 1.46 (7 d) Failure 0.39 after the 1st round

EXAMPLE 7: VARIATION OF CONCENTRATIONS

[0080]

TABLE-US-00005 Varied Surface free energy dispersive polar Concentration in mN/m N/m mN/m 100 ml/l HCl 55.95 38.31 17.64 200 ml/l HCl 57.23 40.25 16.98 50 ml/l H.sub.3 PO *.sub.4 57.85 48.17 9.68 150 ml/l H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 53.1 38.77 14.33 50 ml/l formic acid 65.16 48.04 17.12 150 ml/l formic acid 59.5 44.02 15.48 Without solvent 63.58 47.46 16.12 20 ml/l 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol 69.3 49.42 19.88 100 ml/l 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol 60.34 45.69 14.65 10 g/L NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 70.52 50.8 19.72 60 g/L NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 66.32 50.8 15.52

TABLE-US-00006 Adhesion measurement 1 Pd Varied Cu layer in (1 d) Installation Concentration ?m center [N/cm] in mg/dm.sup.2 100 ml/l HCl 34.8 12.43 0.41 200 ml/l HCl 39.8 0.94 0.61 50 ml/l H.sub.3 PO *.sub.4 44.5 14.88 0.397 150 ml/l H.sub.3 PO.sub.4 38.3 4.19 0.56 50 ml/l formic acid 39.1 14.2 0.413 150 ml/l formic acid 43 6.77 0.58 Without solvent 46.9 11.34 0.413 20 ml/l 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol 41 17.65 0.416 100 ml/l 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol 47.1 3.84 0.36 10 g/L NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 42.8 NA 0.377 60 g/L NH.sub.4 HF.sub.2 46 NA 0.49