Mass spectrometer with bypass of a fragmentation device
10083825 ยท 2018-09-25
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01J49/0031
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A method for analyzing a mixture of components includes forming precursor ions from the components, alternately causing the precursor ions to pass to and to by-pass a fragmentation device, to form product ions from the precursor ions that pass to the device and to form substantially fewer product ions from precursor ions that by-pass the device, and obtaining mass spectra from product ions received from the device and from precursor ions that by-passed the device. An apparatus for analyzing a sample includes an ion source for forming precursor ions from the components of the sample, a fragmentation device for forming product ions from the precursor ions, a by-pass device disposed upstream of the fragmentation device for switchable by-pass of the fragmentation device, and a mass analyzer.
Claims
1. A method of analyzing a sample including a mixture of components comprising: performing liquid chromatography on the sample to produce a sequential eluent of the components from a chromatography column; providing the sequential eluent of the components to an ion source over a period of time; generating parent ions having elution profiles with the ion source; alternately switching a collision cell between a high fragmentation mode wherein parent ions are fragmented in said collision cell into one or more fragment ions and a low fragmentation mode wherein substantially fewer or no parent ions are fragmented in said collision cell to determine the elution profiles of the parent ions and pseudo-elution profiles of the fragment ions; and identifying parent ions of interest by comparing elution profiles of parent ions with pseudo-elution profiles of fragment ions to determine correlations between parent ions and fragment ions.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, comprising alternately switching between said high fragmentation mode and said low fragmentation mode at a rate of approximately once every second or higher.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein alternately switching said collision cell between said high fragmentation mode and said low fragmentation mode comprises alternately switching sufficiently rapidly so that ions derived from the same eluting components are alternately analysed in said high fragmentation mode and in said low fragmentation mode, wherein parent ions are correlated with fragment ions eluting at substantially the same time.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in said high fragmentation mode the collision cell is supplied with a voltage greater than or equal to 15 V and wherein in said low fragmentation mode the collision cell is supplied with a voltage less than or equal to 5 V or substantially 0 V.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sample comprises a plurality of different biopolymers, proteins, peptides, polypeptides, oligionucleotides, oligionucleosides, amino acids, carbohydrates, sugars, lipids, fatty acids, vitamins, hormones, portions or fragments of DNA, portions or fragments of cDNA, portions or fragments of RNA, portions or fragments of mRNA, portions or fragments of tRNA, polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, ribonucleases, enzymes, metabolites, polysaccharides, phosphorylated peptides, phosphorylated proteins, glycopeptides, glycoproteins or steroids.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said collision cell comprises a hexapole rod set.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said collision cell is housed in a housing so that a substantially gas-tight enclosure is formed around the collision cell apart from an aperture to admit ions and for ions to exit from.
8. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein separating or partially separating different components of the mixture comprises separating or partially separating different components of the mixture using a liquid chromatography device.
9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein parent ions of interest are recognised on the basis of mass to charge ratio using a database.
10. A system for analyzing a sample including a mixture of components comprising: a chromatography column for performing liquid chromatography on the sample to produce a sequential eluent of the components; an ion source for receiving the sequential eluent of the components over a period of time and generating parent ions having elution profiles; a collision cell; and a control system which in use: alternately switches said collision cell between a high fragmentation mode wherein parent ions are fragmented in said collision cell into one or more fragment ions and a low fragmentation mode wherein substantially fewer or no parent ions are fragmented in said collision cell to determine the elution profiles of the parent ions and pseudo-elution profiles of the fragment ions; and identifies parent ions of interest by comparing elution profiles of parent ions with pseudo-elution profiles of fragment ions to determine correlations between parent ions and fragment ions.
11. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein said collision cell comprises a hexapole rod set.
12. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein said collision cell is housed in a housing so that a substantially gas-tight enclosure is formed around the collision cell apart from an aperture to admit ions and for ions to exit from.
13. A system as claimed in claim 10, comprising one or more ion guide for guiding said parent ions towards said collision cell.
14. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein in use said control system switches said collision cell between said high fragmentation mode and said low fragmentation mode at a rate of approximately once every second or higher.
15. A system as claimed in claim 10, comprising one or more voltage supplies for supplying voltages to said collision cell, wherein in said high fragmentation mode the collision cell is supplied with a voltage greater than or equal to 15 V and wherein in said low fragmentation mode the collision cell is supplied with a voltage less than or equal to 5 V or substantially 0 V.
Description
(1) Passing ions through a mass filter, preferably a quadrupole mass filter, prior to being passed to the collision, fragmentation or reaction device presents an alternative or an additional method of recognising a fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion. A fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion may be recognised by recognising ions in a high fragmentation or reaction mass spectrum which have a mass to charge ratio which is not transmitted by the collision, fragmentation or reaction device i.e. fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions are recognised by virtue of their having a mass to charge ratio falling outside of the transmission window of the mass filter. If the ions would not be transmitted by the mass filter then they must have been produced in the collision, fragmentation or reaction device. Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16) A preferred embodiment will now be described with reference to
(17) The quadrupole mass filter 3 is preferably disposed in an evacuated chamber which is maintained at a relatively low pressure e.g. less than 10.sup.B5 mbar. The rod electrodes comprising the mass filter 3 are connected to a power supply which generates both RF and DC potentials which determine the mass to charge value transmission window of the mass filter 3.
(18) The collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 may comprise a Surface Induced Dissociation (SID) collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an Electron Transfer Dissociation collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an Electron Capture Dissociation collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an Electron Collision or Impact Dissociation collision, fragmentation or reaction device, a Photo Induced Dissociation (PID) collision, fragmentation or reaction device, a Laser Induced Dissociation collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an infrared radiation induced dissociation device, an ultraviolet radiation induced dissociation device, a thermal or temperature source collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an electric field induced collision, fragmentation or reaction device, a magnetic field induced collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an enzyme digestion or enzyme degradation collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-ion reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-molecule reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-atom reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-metastable ion reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-metastable molecule reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-metastable atom reaction collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an ion-ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions, an ion-molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions, an ion-atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions, an ion-metastable ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions, an ion-metastable molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions or an ion-metastable atom reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions.
(19) Alternatively, the collision, fragmentation or reaction device may form part of the ion source. For example, the collision, fragmentation or reaction device may comprise a nozzle-skimmer interface collision, fragmentation or reaction device, an in-source collision, fragmentation or reaction device or an ion-source Collision Induced Dissociation collision, fragmentation or reaction device.
(20) In an arrangement the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 may comprise either a quadrupole or hexapole rod set which may be enclosed in a substantially gas-tight casing (other than having a small ion entrance and exit orifice) into which a gas such as helium, argon, nitrogen, air or methane may be introduced at a pressure of between 10.sup.4 and 10.sup.1 mbar, further preferably 10.sup.3 mbar to 10.sup.2 mbar. Suitable AC or RF potentials for the electrodes comprising the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 are provided by a power supply (not shown).
(21) Ions generated by the ion source 1 are transmitted by ion guide 2 and pass via an interchamber orifice 7 into vacuum chamber 8. Ion guide 2 is maintained at a pressure intermediate that of the ion source and the vacuum chamber 8. In the embodiment shown, ions are mass filtered by mass filter 3 before entering the preferred collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4. However, the mass filter 3 is an optional feature of this embodiment. Ions exiting from the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 or which have been transmitted through the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 preferably pass to a mass analyser which preferably comprises a Time of Flight mass analyser 5. Other ion optical components, such as further ion guides and/or electrostatic lenses, may be provided which are not shown in the figures or described herein. Such components may be used to maximise ion transmission between various parts or stages of the apparatus. Various vacuum pumps (not shown) may be provided for maintaining optimal vacuum conditions. The Time of Flight mass analyser 5 incorporating a reflectron operates in a known way by measuring the transit time of the ions comprised in a packet of ions so that their mass to charge ratios can be determined.
(22) A control means (not shown) provides control signals for the various power supplies (not shown) which respectively provide the necessary operating potentials for the ion source 1, ion guide 2, quadrupole mass filter 3, collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 and the Time of Flight mass analyser 5. These control signals determine the operating parameters of the instrument, for example the mass to charge ratios transmitted through the mass filter 3 and the operation of the analyser 5. The control means may be a computer (not shown) which may also be used to process the mass spectral data acquired. The computer can also display and store mass spectra produced by the analyser 5 and receive and process commands from an operator. The control means may be automatically set to perform various methods and make various determinations without operator intervention, or may optionally require operator input at various stages.
(23) The control means is also preferably arranged to switch, alter or vary the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 back and forth repeatedly and/or regularly between at least two different modes. In one mode a relatively high voltage such as greater than or equal to 15V may be applied to the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 which in combination with the effect of various other ion optical devices upstream of the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 may be sufficient to cause a fair degree of fragmentation or reaction of ions passing therethrough. In a second mode a relatively low voltage such as less than or equal to 5V may be applied which may cause relatively little (if any) significant fragmentation or reaction of ions passing therethrough.
(24) In one embodiment the control means may switch, alter or vary between modes approximately every second. When the mass spectrometer 6 is used in conjunction with an ion source 1 being provided with an eluent separated from a mixture by means of liquid or gas chromatography, the mass spectrometer 6 may be run for several tens of minutes over which period of time several hundred high and low fragmentation or reaction mass spectra may be obtained.
(25) At the end of the experimental run the data which has been obtained is preferably analysed and parent or precursor ions and fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions can be recognised on the basis of the relative intensity of a peak in a mass spectrum obtained when the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 was in one mode compared with the intensity of the same peak in a mass spectrum obtained approximately a second later in time when the collision, fragmentation or reaction device 4 was in the second mode.
(26) According to an embodiment, mass chromatograms for each parent and fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion are generated and fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions are assigned to parent or precursor ions on the basis of their relative elution times.
(27) An advantage of this method is that since all the data is acquired and subsequently processed then all fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions may be associated with a parent or precursor ion by closeness of fit of their respective elution times. This allows all the parent or precursor ions to be identified from their fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions, irrespective of whether or not they have been discovered by the presence of a characteristic fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion or characteristic neutral loss.
(28) According to another embodiment an attempt is made to reduce the number of parent or precursor ions of interest. A list of possible (i.e. not yet finalised) parent or precursor ions of interest may be formed by looking for parent or precursor ions which may have given rise to a predetermined fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion of interest e.g. an immonium ion from a peptide. Alternatively, a search may be made for parent and fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions wherein the parent or precursor ion could have fragmented or reacted into a first component comprising a predetermined ion or neutral particle and a second component comprising a fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion. Various steps may then be taken to further reduce/refine the list of possible parent or precursor ions of interest to leave a number of parent or precursor ions of interest which are then preferably subsequently identified by comparing elution times of the parent or precursor ions of interest and fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions. As will be appreciated, two ions could have similar mass to charge ratios but different chemical structures and hence would most likely fragment differently enabling a parent or precursor ion to be identified on the basis of a fragment, product, daughter or adduct ion. A sample introduction system is shown in more detail in
(29) A preferred analytical column is a PicoFrit () column packed with Waters () Symmetry C18 set up to spray directly into the mass spectrometer 6. An Electrospray potential (ca. 3 kV) may be applied to the liquid via a low dead volume stainless steel union. A small amount e.g. 5 psi (34.48 kPa) of nebulising gas may be introduced around the spray tip to aid the Electrospray process.
(30) Data can be acquired using a mass spectrometer 6 fitted with a Z-spray () nanoflow Electrospray ion source. The mass spectrometer may be operated in the positive ion mode with a source temperature of 80 C. and a cone gas flow rate of 401/hr.
(31) The instrument may be calibrated with a multi-point calibration using selected fragment, product, daughter or adduct ions that result, for example, from the Collision Induced Decomposition (CID) of Glu-fibrinopeptide b. Data may be processed using the MassLynx () suite of software.
(32)
(33) In
(34)
(35) It can be seen that parent or precursor ion peak MC1 (mass to charge ratio 406.2) correlates well with fragment or daughter ion peak MC5 (mass to charge ratio 136.1) i.e. a parent or precursor ion with a mass to charge ratio of 406.2 seems to have fragmented to produce a fragment or daughter ion with a mass to charge ratio of 136.1. Similarly, parent or precursor ion peaks MC2 and MC3 correlate well with fragment or daughter ion peaks MC4 and MC6, but it is difficult to determine which parent or precursor ion corresponds with which fragment or daughter ion.
(36)
(37) This cross-correlation of mass chromatograms may be carried out using automatic peak comparison means such as a suitable peak comparison software program running on a suitable computer.
(38)
(39)
(40) Some experimental data is now presented which illustrates the ability of the preferred embodiment to quantify the relative abundance of two proteins contained in two different samples which comprise a mixture of proteins.
(41) A first sample contained the tryptic digest products of three proteins BSA, Glycogen Phosphorylase B and Casein. These three proteins were initially present in the ratio 1:1:1. Each of the three proteins had a concentration of 330 fmol/l. A second sample contained the tryptic digest products of the same three proteins BSA, Glycogen Phosphorylase B and
(42) Casein. However, the proteins were initially present in the ratio 1:1:X. X was uncertain but believed to be in the range 2-3. The concentration of the proteins BSA and Glycogen Phosphorylase B in the second sample mixture was the same as in the first sample, namely 330 fmol/l.
(43) The experimental protocol which was followed was that 1 l of sample was loaded for separation on to a HPLC column at a flow rate of 4 l/min. The liquid flow was then split such that the flow rate to the nano-electrospray ionisation source was approximately 200 nl/min.
(44) Mass spectra were recorded on the mass spectrometer 6. Mass spectra were recorded at alternating low and high collision energy using nitrogen collision gas. The low-collision energy mass spectra were recorded at a collision voltage of 10V and the high-collision energy mass spectra were recorded at a collision voltage of 33V. The mass spectrometer was fitted with a Nano-Lock-Spray device which delivered a separate liquid flow to the source which may be occasionally sampled to provide a reference mass from which the mass calibration may be periodically validated. This ensured that the mass measurements were accurate to within an RMS accuracy of 5 ppm. Data were recorded and processed using the MassLynx () data system.
(45) The first sample was initially analysed and the data was used as a reference. The first sample was then analysed a further two times. The second sample was analysed twice. The data from these analyses were used to attempt to quantify the (unknown) relative abundance of Casein in the second sample.
(46) All data files were processed automatically generating a list of ions with associated areas and high-collision energy spectra for each experiment. This list was then searched against the Swiss-Prot protein database using the ProteinLynx () search engine. Chromatographic peak areas were obtained using the Waters () Apex Peak Tracking algorithm. Chromatograms for each charge state found to be present were summed prior to integration.
(47) The experimentally determined relative expression level of various peptide ions normalised with respect to the reference data for the two samples are given in the following tables.
(48) TABLE-US-00001 Sample 1 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 2 BSA peptide ions Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 FKDLGEEHFK 0.652 0.433 0.914 0.661 HLVDEPQNLIK 0.905 0.829 0.641 0.519 KVPQVSTPTLVEVSR 1.162 0.787 0.629 0.635 LVNELTEFAK 1.049 0.795 0.705 0.813 LGEYGFQNALIVR 1.278 0.818 0.753 0.753 AEFVEVTK 1.120 0.821 0.834 0.711 Average 1.028 0.747 0.746 0.682
(49) TABLE-US-00002 Glycogen Phophorylase B Sample 1 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 2 peptide ions Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 VLVDLER 1.279 0.751 n/a 0.701 TNFDAFPDK 0.798 0.972 0.691 0.699 EIWGVEPSR 0.734 0.984 1.053 1.054 LITAIGDVVNHDPVVGDR 1.043 0.704 0.833 0.833 VLPNDNFFEGK 0.969 0.864 0.933 0.808 QIIEQLSSGFFSPK 0.691 n/a 1.428 1.428 VAAAFPGDVDR 1.140 0.739 0.631 0.641 Average 0.951 0.836 0.928 0.881
(50) TABLE-US-00003 CASEIN Sample 1 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 2 Peptide sequence Run 1 Run 2 Run 1 Run 2 EDVPSER 0.962 0.941 2.198 1.962 HQGLPQEVLNENLLR 0.828 0.701 1.736 2.090 FFVAPFPEVFGK 1.231 0.849 2.175 1.596 Average 1.007 0.830 2.036 1.883
(51) Peptides whose sequences were confirmed by high-collision energy data are underlined in the above tables. Confirmation means that the probability of this peptide, given its accurate mass and the corresponding high-collision energy data, is larger than that of any other peptide in the database given the current fragmentation or reaction model. The remaining peptides are believed to be correct based on their retention time and mass compared to those for confirmed peptides. It was expected that there would be some experimental error in the results due to injection volume errors and other effects.
(52) When using BSA as an internal reference, the relative abundance of Glycogen Phosphorylase B in the first sample was determined to be 0.925 (first analysis) and 1.119 (second analysis) giving an average of 1.0. The relative abundance of Glycogen Phosphorylase B in the second sample was determined to be 1.244 (first analysis) and 1.292 (second analysis) giving an average of 1.3. These results compare favourably with the expected value of 1.
(53) Similarly, the relative abundance of Casein in the first sample was determined to be 0.980 (first analysis) and 1.111 (second analysis) giving an average of 1.0. The relative abundance of Casein in the second sample was determined to be 2.729 (first analysis) and 2.761 (second analysis) giving an average of 2.7. These results compare favourably with the expected values of 1 and 2-3.
(54) The following data relates to chromatograms and mass spectra obtained from the first and second samples. One peptide having the sequence HQGLPQEVLNENLLR and derived from Casein elutes at almost exactly the same time as the peptide having the sequence LVNELTEFAK derived from BSA. Although this is an unusual occurrence, it provided an opportunity to compare the abundance of Casein in the two different samples.
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59) Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.