METHOD FOR MACHINING THE TOOTH FLANKS OF BEVEL GEAR WORKPIECES
20180264568 ยท 2018-09-20
Inventors
Cpc classification
B23F19/055
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23F19/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23F9/025
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23F21/22
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method for machining the tooth flanks of a bevel gear workpiece includes carrying out correction machining of a concave tooth flank and a convex tooth flank of at least one tooth gap by, after machining using a first machine setting, cutting free of the concave tooth flank by the bevel gear workpiece executing a workpiece rotation in a first rotational direction having a predefined first absolute value in relation to a gear-cutting tool and/or cutting free the convex flank by the bevel gear workpiece executing a workpiece rotation in another rotational direction having a predefined second absolute value in relation to the gear-cutting tool, and finish machining the concave tooth flank using a second machine setting, which differs from the first machine setting, and finish machining the convex tooth flank using a third machine setting, which differs from the second machine setting.
Claims
1. A method for machining the tooth flanks of a bevel gear workpiece comprising the following steps: a) rotationally driving a gear-cutting tool and machining a bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process including plunging the gear-cutting tool into the workpiece using a first machine setting up to a predefined depth into material of the bevel gear workpiece to machine a concave tooth flank and a convex tooth flank of at least one tooth gap of the bevel gear workpiece, and b) performing a correction machining the concave tooth flank and the convex tooth flank of the at least one tooth gap including (i) one or more of (1) cutting free the concave tooth flank including rotating the workpiece in a first rotational direction to an angle defined by a predefined first absolute value relative to the gear-cutting tool; or (2) cutting free the convex tooth flank including rotating the workpiece in another rotational direction to an angle defined by a predefined second absolute value relative to the gear-cutting tool, thereby enlarging a gap width of the at least one tooth gap, and (ii) finish machining the concave tooth flank using a second machine setting, which differs from the first machine setting, and (iii) finish machining the convex tooth flank using a third machine setting, which differs from the second machine setting.
2. The method according to claim 1, including performing the steps of cutting free the concave tooth flank and finish machining the concave tooth flank simultaneously and using the second machine setting.
3. The method according to claim 1, including performing the steps of cutting free the convex tooth flank and finish machining of the convex tooth flank simultaneously and using the third machine setting.
4. The method according to claim 1, further including transitioning the gear-cutting tool from the first machine setting into the second machine setting while the gear-cutting tool is partially located in the at least one tooth gap.
5. The method according to claim 1, including cutting free the concave tooth flank and cutting free the convex tooth flank, wherein the predefined first absolute value is identical to the predefined second absolute value.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gear-cutting tool defines a cutter head gear-cutting tool defining bar cutters or cutter inserts, wherein each of the bar cutters or cutter inserts defines two cutting edges configured to machine the concave tooth flank and the convex tooth flank simultaneously during the step of machining the bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gear-cutting tool defines a cutter head gear-cutting tool defining bar cutters or cutter inserts, wherein a part of each of the bar cutters or cutter inserts defines a cutting edge configured to machine the concave tooth flank during the step of machining the bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process, and wherein another part of each of the bar cutters or the cutter inserts defines a cutting edge configured to machine the convex tooth flank during the step of machining the bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the correction machining step includes correcting flank angle errors in the workpiece oriented in a same direction that occurred during the step of machining the bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process.
9. The method according to claim 1, further including measuring the bevel gear workpiece before performing the correction machining step, wherein the measuring step is adapted to detect flank angle errors in the workpiece.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the bevel gear workpiece is one bevel gear workpiece of a series of bevel gear workpieces, and the method further includes measuring the bevel gear workpiece after the step of machining the bevel gear workpiece using a chip removal process, and then subsequently performing correction machining of further bevel gear workpieces of the series of bevel gear workpieces.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plunging defines a single-indexing process or a continuous-indexing process.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said plunging defines a continuous-indexing process, and the method further includes coupledly rotationally driving the bevel gear workpiece with said rotational driving of the gear-cutting tool.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the bevel gear workpiece defines a crown gear workpiece.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0034] Other advantages and features of the disclosed subject matter will become apparent from the following detailed description, which are to be understood not to be limiting and which will be described in greater detail hereafter with reference to the drawings, wherein:
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0044] Terms are used in conjunction with the present disclosure which are also used in relevant publications and patents. However, it is to be noted that the use of these terms is only to serve for better understanding. The inventive concepts and the scope of protection of the patent claims are not to be restricted in the interpretation by the specific selection of the terms. The invention may be readily transferred to other term systems and/or technical fields. The terms are to be applied accordingly in other technical fields.
[0045] Greatly varying gear-cutting tools 100 (for example, solid tools) having defined cutting edges and grinding tools (for example, cup grinding tools) can be used for machining the tooth flanks of bevel gear workpieces. Details of embodiments are described in conjunction with the following description, in which cutter head gear-cutting tools 100 are used, which comprise bar cutters or cutter inserts. A bar cutter or cutter insert can have, for example, two cutting edges, wherein one of these cutting edges is designed for the machining of the concave tooth flank 13.1 of a tooth gap 12 and the other of these cutting edges is designed for the machining of the convex tooth flank 13.2 of the tooth gap 12 in each case. The gear-cutting tools 100 can also comprise bar cutters or cutter inserts arranged in groups, however, in which one part of the bar cutters or cutter inserts have cutting edges for machining the concave tooth flank 13.1 and another part of the bar cutters or cutter inserts have cutting edges for machining the convex tooth flank 13.2.
[0046] However, what is described may also be transferred to other tools 100, which are designed for the gear cutting of bevel gear workpieces 10.
[0047] Such tools 100 and the corresponding gear-cutting machines are well known and have been used for many years in the gear cutting field.
[0048] The details of a first method are shown in summary in schematic form in
[0049] The method is based in some embodiments on a classical plunging method, which was already described in conjunction with
[0050] The dotted arrow in
[0051] After the tool 100 has reached the final plunging position, which is defined by the position of the tooth base on the crown gear workpiece 10, a method follows, which is referred to here as combined correction machining FB&KB.
[0052] The double arrow FB&KB has a slight curve in
[0053] The gap width is greater after the combined correction machining FB&KB than the tip width s.sub.a0 of the tool 100. The tip width s.sub.a0 is shown in
[0054] The tool 100 is only drawn out of the tooth gap by a reverse-oriented movement AT after this combined correction machining FB&KB has been carried out by the adjustment of the machine settings. There is also a reversal point UP here.
[0055] Up to the execution of the reverse-oriented movement AT, in some embodiments, the tool 100 can remain a short time in the final position, so that more than only one bar cutter or cutter insert is guided in a chip-removing manner through the tooth gap.
[0056]
[0057] In contrast to the embodiment illustrated in
[0058] The workpiece rotation is executed with a predefined absolute value in one or in both rotational directions. The tooth gap 12 thus obtains an enlarged gap width. The gap width is greater here immediately after the classical cutting free than the tip width s.sub.a0 of the tool 100.
[0059] In the second method, the cutting free takes place upon reaching or after reaching the plunging final position while maintaining the first machine setting M1. Solely the crown gear workpiece 10 completes a workpiece rotation during the classical cutting free. Therefore, the symbol M1 is shown directly adjacent to the reference sign FB in
[0060] Carrying out correction machining KB now takes place, e.g., as illustrated in schematic form in
[0061] A flank angle error, for example, or also other errors of the tooth flanks of the tooth gap can be intentionally corrected by this type of the correction machining KB, which takes place while the tool 100 is located in the tooth gap of the crown gear workpiece 10. The adjustment of the machine setting is indicated in
[0062] The tool 100 is drawn by a reverse-oriented movement AT out of the tooth gap after this correction machining KB has taken place by the adjustment of the machine settings. There is also a reversal point UP here.
[0063] If either the single-indexing or the continuous-indexing plunging methods are applied, the workpiece rotation which is used for the cutting free takes place with an angle absolute value which is significantly less than the indexing p of the crown gear workpiece 10 to be machined. In contrast to the single-indexing plunging method, during the continuous-indexing plunging method, the crown gear workpiece 10 rotates in a synchronized (coupled) manner in a specific ratio to the tool speed (depending on the tooth count and the cutter head number of threads). This synchronized movement is overlaid during the workpiece rotation with a phase shift of the rotational angle of the workpiece. This phase shift is also significantly less than the indexing p.
[0064] The values indicated hereafter each relate to the crown wheel which was used to design the crown gear 10. Therefore, all symbols are provided with a subscript P.
[0065]
[0066] A normal section through a tooth gap 12 is shown in schematic form in the upper part of
[0067]
[0068] The flank angle error FWF is defined after the plunging as the difference between the setpoint curve 13.1.sup.S,T, 13.2.sup.S,T and the actual curve of the tooth flanks 13.1.sup.T, 13.2.sup.T. A positive flank angle error FWF is an angle error here in which the dotted line, which is used to illustrate the setpoint curve 13.1.sup.S,T, 13.2.sup.S,T in the direction of the tooth height, has a steeper slope than the actual curve of the tooth flanks 13.1.sup.T, 13.2.sup.T.
[0069]
[0070] The two short arrow tips identified with ?1 and ?2, which point in the clockwise direction and counterclockwise direction, respectively, illustrate the two workpiece rotations. The angle absolute value of the workpiece rotation may be equal in both rotational directions in some embodiments, i.e. |?1|=|?2|. The gap width e has been minimally expanded by the cutting free, which is hardly visible in comparison to
[0071] The correction machining can be performed by changing the machine settings. The result after this correction machining is shown, for example, in
[0072] It is to be noted that
[0073] The flank angle error FWF discussed here is an error which can be determined point by point on each tooth flank 13.1, 13.2 by measurement. Since these are flank angle errors FWF which have been induced by the plunging using the first machine setting M1, the flank angle error FWF along each of the tooth flanks 13.1 and 13.2 is constant in the flank longitudinal direction.
[0074] The illustration of
[0075] The flank angle errors FWF, which can be remedied according to methods disclosed herein, are flank angle errors FWF, which are each measured in the vertical direction of the teeth 11.
[0076] The illustration of
[0077] However, the illustration of three steps in
[0078] The first modified plunging method, in which the cutting free and the correction machining take place jointly, is illustrated in
[0079] What is described here may be applied to single-indexing methods, in which machining is performed tooth gap 12 by tooth gap 12 as shown in
[0080] The adjustment of the machine setting relates here in some embodiments to the adjustment of at least one variable in addition to the workpiece pivot ?.
[0081] In a simplified special case, for example, in addition to the workpiece pivot ?, the cradle angle ? can also be changed in a first direction (referred to as second machine setting M2 here), to correct one concave tooth flank 13.1.sup.T (in the single-indexing method) or all concave tooth flanks 13.1.sup.T (in the continuous-indexing method). For the correction machining of one convex tooth flank 13.2.sup.T (in the single-indexing method) or all convex tooth flanks 13.2.sup.T (in the continuous-indexing method), the cradle angle ? is then changed in an opposing direction.
[0082] The differences of the three different machine settings M1, M2, M3 will be summarized once again on the basis of this simplified special case. In the first machine setting M1, the cradle angle is ?=?1 and during the plunging the depth position ? is changed, for example, from a starting depth position ?0 to ?1. The absolute value of this change is identified with ET in
[0083] The second machine setting M2 differs in the simplified special case from the first machine setting M1, for example, by way of a different cradle angle ?2??1 and by way of a workpiece pivot ??. The depth position ? remains, for example, unchanged, i.e., ?2=?1.
[0084] The third machine setting M3 differs in the simplified special case from the first and second machine settings M1 and M2, respectively, for example, by way of a different cradle angle ?3??2??1 and by way of a workpiece pivot +?. The depth position ? remains, for example, unchanged, i.e., ?3=?1=?2.
[0085] The transition of the cutter head gear-cutting tool 100 from the first machine setting M1 into the second machine setting M2 may take place while the cutting edges of the cutter head gear-cutting tool 100 are located in the tooth gap 12. Similarly, the transition of a grinding tool from the first machine setting M1 into the second machine setting M2 can also take place while the abrasive surfaces of the grinding tool are located in the tooth gap 12.
[0086] It is well known to a person skilled in the art in gear cutting that changing or adjusting a single variable of the machine setting of the gear cutting model can run to the adjustment of two or more than two variables in a real gear-cutting machine. This is because, inter alia, these are relative adjustments, which can often be executed more rapidly if, for example, the bevel gear workpiece 10 and the gear-cutting tool 100 are moved. Moreover, not every one of the available machines images the axes of the gear cutting model with 1:1 accuracy, but rather the axial constellations can sometimes be quite different.
[0087] The bevel gear workpiece 10 can be subjected to a measurement after the plunging and before carrying out the correction machining, to detect flank angle errors FWF and ascertain the size thereof.
[0088] However, one bevel gear workpiece 10 of a series of bevel gear workpieces can also be subjected to a measurement after the chip-removing machining in the plunging method, to then subsequently execute the correction machining in further bevel gear workpieces of the series of bevel gear workpieces.
[0089] As may be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art based on the teachings herein, numerous changes and modifications may be made to the above-described and other embodiments without departing from the spirit and/or scope of the invention. Accordingly, this detailed description of embodiments is to be taken in an illustrative as opposed to a limiting sense.