METHOD OF IMPROVING FIRE TUBE BURNER EFFICIENCY BY CONTROLLING COMBUSTION AIR FLOW AND AN AIR DAMPER FOR A FIRE TUBE
20180259184 ยท 2018-09-13
Inventors
Cpc classification
F23D14/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23L13/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23N3/005
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02E20/34
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
F23N3/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A method of improving natural draft fire tube burner efficiency by controlling combustion air flow. The method involves positioning in a fire tube an air damper body comprising a fixed plate having a plurality of air flow openings and a rotatable plate having a plurality of air flow openings. Air flow through the air damper body is controlled by adjusting the relative rotational position of the fixed plate and the rotatable plate. The air damper body has an air inlet face, an air outlet face, and an outer circumference. The method involves establishing and maintaining a relationship between an air damper open area, firing rate and excess air to maintain stack oxygen below 3% in accordance with a formula A2+A3<DRFRA1.
Claims
1. An air damper for a natural draft fire tube, comprising: an air damper body comprising a fixed plate having a plurality of air flow openings and a rotatable plate having a plurality of air flow openings, with air flow through the air damper body being controlled by adjusting the relative rotational position of the fixed plate and the rotatable plate, the air damper body having an air inlet face, an air outlet face, and an outer circumference; and a relationship is maintained between an air damper open area, firing rate and excess air in accordance with a formula A2+A3<DFFRA1, in which: A1=total area of air flow openings in the air damper body created by a relative positioning of the air flow openings of the fixed plate and the air flow openings of the rotatable plate at a given closing position for a given firing rate; A2=total area of other openings in the air damper body through which air can bypass the air flow openings; A3=total area between an outer diameter (OD) of the air damper body and an inner diameter (ID) of the fire tube through which air can bypass the air flow openings, and FR=firing rate in % of maximum rate for a particular firetube-burner combination; DF=diameter factor, where D=fire tube inner diameter and the factor is a relationship of 0.12D26.29D+92.
2. The air damper of claim 1, wherein a central burner passage through the air damper body, the central burner passage being adapted to receive a burner body.
3. The air damper of claim 1, wherein a deformable circumferential seal around the outer circumference of the air damper body, the circumferential seal being adapted to engage an inner circumference of a fire tube solely by friction.
4. The air damper of claim 1, wherein the rotatable plate is positioned at the inlet face of the air damper body and the fixed plate is positioned at the outlet face of the air damper body.
5. The air damper of claim 4, wherein the outlet face of the air damper body has outwardly projecting air deflectors overlying the air flow openings of the fixed plate.
6. The air damper of claim 4, wherein a handle is provided on the rotatable plate, whereby a manual force is exerted via the handle to rotate the rotatable plate thereby adjusting the position of the air flow openings of the rotatable plate relative to the air flow openings of the fixed plate.
7. The air damper of claim 2, wherein an ignitor passage extends through the air damper body in parallel spaced relation to the central burner passage, wherein an ignitor can be inserted and removed, a seal being provided to prevent airflow through the ignitor passage bypassing the air damper.
8. The air damper of claim 2, in combination with a burner body, the burner body being positioned within the central burner passage of the air damper body, the burner body having a nozzle end protruding passed the air outlet face of the air damper body and a fuel gas source attachment end protruding passed the air inlet face of the air damper body.
9. The air damper of claim 8, in combination with a fire tube.
10. An air damper for a natural draft fire tube having an inner circumference and a burner body disposed therein, the air damper comprising: an air damper body comprising: a burner passage adapted to receive the burner body; a peripheral seal adapted to engage the inner circumference of the fire tube; and a plurality of air flow openings disposed about the central burner passage with the size of the air flow openings adjustable; wherein, in use, air flow between the central burner passage and the burner body is impeded, air flow between the peripheral seal and the inner circumference of the fire tube is impeded, and air flow through the air flow openings is user adjustable with a relationship maintained between an air damper open area, firing rate and excess air in accordance with a formula A2+A3<DFFRA1, in which: A1=total area of air flow openings in the air damper body created by a relative positioning of the air flow openings of the fixed plate and the air flow openings of the rotatable plate at a given closing position for a given firing rate; A2=total area of other openings in the air damper body through which air can bypass the air flow openings; A3=total area between an outer diameter (OD) of the air damper body and an inner diameter (ID) of the fire tube through which air can bypass the air flow openings, and FR=firing rate in % of maximum rate for a particular firetube-burner combination; DF=diameter factor, where D=fire tube inner diameter and the factor is a relationship of 0.12D26.29D+92.
11. A method of improving natural draft fire tube burner efficiency by controlling combustion air flow, comprising: positioning in a fire tube an air damper body comprising a fixed plate having a plurality of air flow openings and a rotatable plate having a plurality of air flow openings, with air flow through the air damper body being controlled by adjusting the relative rotational position of the fixed plate and the rotatable plate, the air damper body having an air inlet face, an air outlet face, and an outer circumference; and establishing and maintaining a relationship between an air damper open area, firing rate and excess air to maintain excess air below 3% in accordance with a formula A2+A3<DFFRA1, in which: A1=total area of air flow openings in the air damper body created by a relative positioning of the air flow openings of the fixed plate and the air flow openings of the rotatable plate at a given closing position for a given firing rate; A2=total area of other openings in the air damper body through which air can bypass the air flow openings; A3=total area between an outer diameter (OD) of the air damper body and an inner diameter (ID) of the fire tube through which air can bypass the air flow openings, and FR=firing rate in % of maximum rate for a particular firetube-burner combination; DF=diameter factor, where D=fire tube inner diameter and the factor is a relationship of 0.12D26.29D+92.
12. An air damper for a natural draft fire tube, comprising: an air damper body comprising a fixed plate having a plurality of air flow openings and a rotatable plate having a plurality of air flow openings, with air flow through the air damper body being controlled by adjusting the relative rotational position of the fixed plate and the rotatable plate, the air damper body having an air inlet face, an air outlet face, and an outer circumference; and a deformable circumferential seal around the outer circumference of the air damper body, the circumferential seal being adapted to engage an inner circumference of a fire tube solely by friction.
13. The air damper of claim 12, wherein an ignitor passage extends through the air damper body, wherein an ignitor can be inserted and removed, a seal being provided to prevent airflow through the ignitor passage bypassing the air damper.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022] These and other features will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to be in any way limiting, wherein:
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0032] An air damper, generally identified by reference numeral 10, will now be described with reference to
Structure and Relationship of Parts:
[0033] Referring to
[0034] Referring to
[0035] Referring to
[0036] Referring to
[0037] Referring to
[0038] Referring to
Operation:
[0039] Referring to
[0040] Tests were conducted to determine the relative efficiency of air damper 10, with and without circumferential seal 32. It was determined that air damper 10 with circumferential seal 32 outperformed air damper 10 without circumferential seal 32. The increase in total efficiency (BTUs into the process for BTUs created from gas combustion) depended upon the turn down rate of the combustion system. For example, when the combustion system firing rate was reduced to 40% of the maximum possible firing rate (60% turn down) and rotatable plate 14 was rotated relative to fixed plate 14 to reduce the air flow through air damper body 12 appropriately, air damper 10 with circumferential seal 32 transferred up to 43% more heat into the process for the same quantity of gas consumed, as compared to combustion assemblies having air dampers without circumferential seal 32.
[0041] The gap about the periphery of the damper had never previously been considered a problem because the relationship between air damper uncontrolled open area, controllable secondary air flow area, excess air and firing rate was not well understood. A peripheral seal was added, forcing all the air flow to pass through the damper. The effect on efficiency was then measured. Marginal increases in efficiency were measured at lower turn down rates. However, as the turn down rates became higher, unexpected increases in efficiency were measured. As set forth above, with a 60% turn down rate, up to 43% more heat is transferred. It was then realized that the other openings through the damper were also having an effect upon burner efficiency.
[0042] It is known that stack oxygen in a 2-3% range is sufficient to promote combustion without adversely affecting burner efficiency. It has been determined that a relationship exists between air damper open area, firing rate (turndown) and excess air. A secondary air control plate (damper) should be designed in accordance with a formula A2+A3<DFFRA1, in which:
[0043] A1=total area of air flow openings in the air damper body created by a relative positioning of the air flow openings of the fixed plate and the air flow openings of the rotatable plate at a given closing position for a given firing rate;
[0044] A2=total area of other openings in the air damper body through which air can bypass the air flow openings;
[0045] A3=total area between an outer diameter (OD) of the air damper body and an inner diameter (ID) of the fire tube through which air can bypass the air flow openings, and
[0046] FR=firing rate in % of maximum rate for a particular firetube-burner combination;
[0047] DF=diameter factor, where D=fire tube inner diameter and the factor is a relationship of 0.12D26.29D+92. (The symbol reflecting a raising to the power of 2)
[0048] This formula is applicable for all firing rates below 100% and natural draft greater than 0.05 mm h20. Stated another way, if A2+A3>DFFRA1, then there will no longer be excess air control and stack oxygen levels will be dictated by fire tube draft alone and will always exceed 3%. There follows a series of graphs and a summary of results showing a test comparison of five different models operating at 100% of Maximum Combustion Rate (MCR), 80% MCR, 60% MCR and 40% MCR. As will become apparent from a review of the test data set forth below, the differences in efficiency become more pronounced as the MCR is lowered. At 40% MCR, a burner controlled in accordance with the formula A2+A3<DFFRA1 uses 43% less fuel gas to provide the same heat input to the process vessel than other burners having dampers where A2+A3>DFFRA1. It is believed that the reason for this is that, notwithstanding the presence of a damper, too much excess air is drawn through various openings as dictated by fire tube draft. This formula is believed to be applicable to all natural draft tubes with a nominal outer diameter of 10 inches to 30 inches.
[0049] In this patent document, the word comprising is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article a does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
[0050] The scope of the claims should not be limited by the illustrated embodiments set forth as examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with a purposive construction of the claims in view of the description as a whole.