METHOD FOR IMPROVING AFTERTASTE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES USING ALLULOSE

Abstract

The present invention relates to an agent for improving aftertaste of alcoholic beverages comprising allulose-containing saccharides, and a method for improving aftertaste of alcoholic beverages using allulose.

Claims

1. An agent for improving an alcohol flavor of an alcoholic beverage, comprising allulose-containing saccharides and ethanol.

2. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the ethanol is present in an amount of 6 vol % to 70 vol % based on the total volume of the alcoholic beverage.

3. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the alcoholic beverage is a distillated alcoholic beverage.

4. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the alcohol flavor is a bitterness or smell of alcohol.

5. The agent according to claim 1, wherein improving the alcohol flavor comprises reducing or masking the alcohol flavor.

6. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the allulose is present in an amount of 50 parts by weight to 100 parts by weight relative to 100 parts by weight of the saccharides in terms of dried solid content.

7. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the allulose-containing saccharides is present in an amount of 0.1 g to 10 g per 1 L of the alcoholic beverage.

8. The agent according to claim 1, wherein the allulose is present in an amount of 5 g to 600 g per 1 L of the ethanol.

9. A method of improving an alcohol flavor of an alcoholic beverage, comprising: adding allulose to the alcoholic beverage; or adding allulose to a beverage, followed by adding ethanol to the beverage.

10. Use of allulose-containing saccharides for improving an alcohol flavor of an alcoholic beverage.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0026] FIG. 1 is a graph showing a relationship between alcohol concentration and alcohol bitterness according to Examples and Comparative Examples.

[0027] FIG. 2 is a graph showing a relationship between alcohol concentration and alcohol smell according to Examples and Comparative Examples.

[0028] (※ In the drawings, * indicates a statistically significant trend (p<0.1), and ** indicates a statistically significant difference (p<0.05).)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0029] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples. However, it should be noted that these examples are provided for illustration only and should not be construed in any way as limiting the invention. In addition, these examples are provided for more complete understanding of the present invention by one of ordinary skill in the art.

EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLE 1

Preparation and Quality Analysis of Diluted Soju

[0030] Generally, alcoholic beverages have varying alcohol contents depending upon the kind and manufacturing method thereof. Beer has an alcohol content of 4 vol % to 12 vol % (generally 5 vol %), wine has an alcohol content of 6 vol % to 12 vol % (generally 8 vol %), Sake has an alcohol content of 8 vol % to 15 vol % (generally 13 vol %), and soju has an alcohol content of 14 vol % to 20 vol % (generally 18 vol %). For an alcoholic beverage having an alcohol content of less than 6 wt %, since an unpleasant flavor of alcohol is not significant, diluted soju having an alcohol content of 8.0% or more was prepared to check change in quality due to addition of allulose.

[0031] (1) Preparation of Diluted Soju

[0032] Diluted soju samples of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 and Examples 1 to 3 were prepared as follows. First, purified water was added to a rectified spirit having an alcohol concentration of 95 vol %, thereby preparing 10 L of a primarily diluted rectified spirit having an alcohol concentration of 50 vol %. Then, activated carbon powder was mixed with the primarily diluted rectified spirit, followed by aging and deodorization for 1 to 3 hours, and then the resulting mixture was clarified using a filter containing diatomaceous earth (SELECT® A20, BEGEROW Co.). Then, sugar (purity: 98 wt % or more, White Sugar, CJ Cheiljedang) or allulose (crystal allulose, purity: 98 wt % or more, CJ Cheiljedang) was mixed with the clarified mixture in amounts as listed in Table 1, followed by adding purified water, thereby preparing 1 L of a secondarily diluted rectified spirit. Then, the secondarily diluted rectified spirit was clarified in the same manner as the primarily diluted rectified spirit.

[0033] In addition, purified water was added to the clarified primarily diluted rectified spirit to dilute the spirit to alcohol concentrations as listed in Table 2, thereby preparing Sensory Comparison Examples for sensory evaluation.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Primarily diluted Final Alcohol Sweetener rectified spirit Sugar Allulose volume concentration concentration Note 50 vol % — — — — — Unit mL g g mL vol % g/L % Comparative 160 10 1000  8.0% 1.0% Example 1 Comparative 260 10 1000 13.0% 1.0% Example 2 Comparative 360 10 1000 18.0% 1.0% Example 3 Example 1 160 10 1000  8.0% 1.0% Example 2 260 10 1000 13.0% 1.0% Example 3 360 10 1000 18.0% 1.0%

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Score of smell or Primarily diluted Final Alcohol Sweetener bitterness rectified spirit Sugar Allulose volume concentration concentration intensity of Note 50 vol % — — — — — alcohol in sensory Unit mL g g mL vol % g/L % evaluation Sensory 100 1000  5.0% 0.0% 1 comparison A1 Sensory 120 1000  6.0% 0.0% 3 comparison A2 Sensory 140 1000  7.0% 0.0% 5 comparison A3 Sensory 160 1000  8.0% 0.0% 7 comparison A4 Sensory 180 1000  9.0% 0.0% 9 comparison A5 Sensory 200 1000 10.0% 0.0% 1 comparison B1 Sensory 220 1000 11.0% 0.0% 3 Comparison B2 Sensory 240 1000 12.0% 0.0% 5 Comparison B3 Sensory 260 1000 13.0% 0.0% 7 comparison B4 Sensory 280 1000 14.0% 0.0% 9 comparison B5 Sensory 300 1000 15.0% 0.0% 1 comparison C1 Sensory 320 1000 16.0% 0.0% 3 comparison C2 Sensory 340 1000 17.0% 0.0% 5 comparison C3 Sensory 360 1000 18.0% 0.0% 7 comparison C4 Sensory 380 1000 19.0% 0.0% 9 comparison C5

[0034] (2) Sensory Evaluation

[0035] Sensory evaluation was carried out by 15 trained panelists. Here, the panelists were provided with the standard products as Sensory Comparison Examples (Table 2) and trained to be fully aware of an unpleasant bitterness and smell inherent to alcohol and compare intensity of the bitterness and smell to match a randomly offered diluted soju sample to the alcohol concentration thereof.

[0036] Specifically, sensory evaluation was carried out through the following procedure. First, the panelists were placed in separate rooms, respectively, and then provided with Sensory Comparison Examples to be aware of the bitterness and smell inherent to alcohol, once more, prior to being provided with the samples of Examples and Comparative Examples. Thereafter, the samples of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, each labelled with a three-digit random number, were provided in a transparent cup one by one in a double-blind fashion. During evaluation, each of the panelists was instructed to hold the sample in his/her mouth to taste the sample before spitting the sample out, to be prevented from becoming intoxicated due to excessive intake. In addition, after evaluation of each sample, the panelists were allowed to rinse their mouths with cooked rice and water to prepare for evaluation of the next sample. Each of the trained panelists evaluated intensity of the smell and bitterness of alcohol of each of the samples of Examples and Comparative Examples on a 9-point scale (as shown in Table 2) with reference to Sensory Comparison Examples.

[0037] For evaluation of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, evaluation of Example 2 and Comparative Example 2, and evaluation of Example 3 and Comparative Example 3, Sensory Comparison Examples A1 to A5, Sensory Comparison Examples B1 to B5, and Sensory Comparison Examples C1 to C5 were provided, respectively. In addition, after each evaluation, the panelists were allowed to rest for at least 12 to 24 hours to avoid confusion due to excessive intake.

[0038] For the samples of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, the samples of Example 2 and Comparative Example 2, and the samples of Example 3 and Comparative Example 3, scores of intensity of the smell or bitterness of alcohol in sensory evaluation (hereinafter, “sensory scores”) were converted into alcohol concentration according to Equation 1, Equation 2, and Equation 3, respectively, thereby calculating perceived alcohol concentrations, which in turn were compared with the actual alcohol concentrations to confirm reduction effects in smell and bitterness of alcohol.

Perceived alcohol concentration (%)=(0.005×sensory score+0.045)×100   <Equation 1>

Perceived alcohol concentration (%)=(0.005×sensory score+0.095)×100   <Equation 2>

Perceived alcohol concentration (%)=(0.005×sensory score+0.145)×100   <Equation 3>

[0039] Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1 program (SAS Inc., Cary, N.C., USA), and sensory evaluation results were analyzed by t-test method. All analysis results were approved at a significance level of p<0.05.

[0040] As a result, it was confirmed that the samples of Examples had a perceived alcohol concentration (i.e., intensity of smell and bitterness of alcohol) that is about 0.6% to 0.8% lower than the actual alcohol concentration. In addition, it could be seen that the samples of Examples 1 to 3 containing allulose exhibited a statistically significant decrease (p<0.05) in smell and bitterness of alcohol, as compared with those of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 containing the same amount of saccharides.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparative Comparative Comparative Sample Example 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 2 Example 3 Example 3 Actual alcohol 8.0% 13.0% 18.0% concentration Perceived alcohol 7.8% 7.4% 13.1% 12.2% 17.9% 17.3% concentration (bitterness) p-value 0.013 0.000 0.001

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comparative Comparative Comparative Sample Example 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 2 Example 3 Example 3 Actual alcohol 8.0% 13.0% 18.0% concentration Perceived alcohol 7.9% 7.5% 13.1% 12.3% 18.0% 17.4% concentration (smell) p-value 0.021 0.000 0.001

EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLE 2

Preparation and Quality Analysis of Diluted Soju Having Different Saccharide Concentrations

[0041] In order to confirm saccharide concentration-dependent reduction effects in smell and bitterness of alcohol, changes in quality of diluted soju with varying amount of added allulose were checked for a given alcohol concentration. Here, the alcohol concentration was set to 18%, which is an alcohol concentration of the most typical diluted soju in Korea.

[0042] (1) Preparation of Diluted Soju Having Different Saccharide Concentrations

[0043] Samples of Comparative Examples 4 to 8, samples of Examples 4 to 8, and Sensory Comparison Examples D1 to D5 were prepared in the same manner as in Experimental Example 1 except that amounts of saccharides were changed as listed in Tables 5 and 6.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Primarily diluted Final Alcohol Sweetener rectified spirit Sugar Allulose volume concentration concentration Note 50 vol % — — — — — Unit mL g g mL vol % g/L % Comparative 350 1 1000 18.0% 0.10% Example 4 Comparative 350 3 1000 18.0% 0.30% Example 5 Comparative 350 10 1000 18.0% 1.00% Example 6 Comparative 350 30 1000 18.0% 3.00% Example 7 Comparative 350 100 1000 18.0% 10.00%  Example 8 Example 4 350 1 1000 18.0% 0.10% Example 5 350 3 1000 18.0% 0.30% Example 6 350 10 1000 18.0% 1.00% Example 7 350 30 1000 18.0% 3.00% Example 8 350 100 1000 18.0% 10.00% 

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Score of smell or Primarily diluted Final Alcohol Sweetener bitterness rectified spirit Sugar Allulose volume concentration concentration intensity of Note 50 vol % — — — — — alcohol in sensory Unit mL g g mL vol % g/L % evaluation Sensory 300 1000 15.0% 0.0% 1 comparison D1 Sensory 320 1000 16.0% 0.0% 3 comparison D2 Sensory 340 1000 17.0% 0.0% 5 comparison D3 Sensory 360 1000 18.0% 0.0% 7 comparison D4 Sensory 380 1000 19.0% 0.0% 9 comparison D5

[0044] (2) Sensory Evaluation

[0045] Sensory evaluation of Examples 4 to 8 and Comparative Examples 4 to 8 was performed in the same manner as in Experimental Example 1. Sensory scores were converted into alcohol concentration according to Equation 3, thereby calculating perceived alcohol concentrations, which, in turn, were compared with the actual alcohol concentrations, respectively, to confirm reduction effects in smell and bitterness of alcohol. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1 program (SAS Inc., Cary, N.C., USA), and sensory evaluation results were analyzed by t-test method.

[0046] As a result, it was confirmed that the samples of Examples 4 to 7 having an allulose content of 0.1% to 3.0% exhibited a statistically significant decrease in alcohol bitterness, as compared with those of Comparative Examples containing the same amount of sugar, and the samples of Examples 5 to 7 having an allulose content of 0.3% to 3.0% exhibited a statistically significant decrease in alcohol smell, as compared with those of Comparative Examples (Table 7, FIGS. 1 and 2).

[0047] In addition, it was confirmed entirely that bitterness of alcohol decreased due to increase in sweetness with increasing concentration of sugar or allulose. However, considering that the sweetness intensity of allulose is about 70% that of sugar, it can be seen that reduction effects in smell and bitterness of alcohol is not due to simply sweetness enhancement by addition of saccharides but due to efficacy of allulose.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Comp. Comp. Comp. Comp. Comp. Sample Example 4 Example 4 Example 5 Example 5 Example 6 Example 6 Example 7 Example 7 Example 8 Example 8 Actual 18.0% 18.0% 18.0% 18.0% 18.0% alcohol concentration Saccharide  0.1%  0.3%  1.0%  3.0% 10.0% concentration Perceived 18.1% 17.8% 18.0% 17.7% 17.8% 17.3% 17.5% 16.9% 16.6% 16.3% alcohol concentration (bitterness) p-value 0.093 0.011 0.001 0.000 0.064 Perceived 18.0% 17.8% 17.9% 17.6% 17.6% 17.1% 17.4% 16.8% 16.7% 16.4% alcohol concentration (smell) p-value 0.029 0.008 0.000 0.000 0.077