MONITORING THE STATE OF OVERVOLTAGE PROTECTION COMPONENTS
20220357387 · 2022-11-10
Inventors
- REIKO SAENGER (Lauscha, DE)
- HAKAN SAYINC (Berlin, DE)
- PETER RIEDEL (Jena, DE)
- OLIVER SCHADOW (Stahnsdorf, DE)
Cpc classification
G01K11/3206
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R31/12
PHYSICS
G01D5/353
PHYSICS
Abstract
The invention relates to a system and a method for monitoring the state of at least one over voltage protection component. The system has a transmission unit and a connection assembly coupled to the transmission unit. The system additionally has at least one measuring assembly coupled to the connection assembly. The at least one measuring assembly is designed to be arranged in at least one over voltage protection component. The system additionally has an analysis unit coupled to the at least one measuring assembly.
Claims
1. A system for monitoring the state of at least one over voltage protection component, wherein the system has: a transmission unit; a connection assembly coupled with the transmission unit; at least one measuring assembly coupled with the connection assembly, which measuring assembly is able to be arranged in or on at least one over voltage protection component; and an evaluation unit coupled with the at least one measuring assembly; wherein the transmission unit is configured to transmit a signal, the transmission unit and the connection assembly are coupled such that the signal is able to be coupled into the connection assembly, the connection assembly is configured and arranged so as to guide the coupled-in signal in the direction of the at least one measuring assembly, the connection assembly and the at least one measuring assembly are coupled with one another such that the signal is able to be coupled into the at least one measuring assembly, and the at least one measuring assembly is configured to reflect the signal, in dependence on a state of the at least one over voltage protection component, such that information about the state of the at least one over voltage protection component is able to be derived from the reflected signal by the evaluation unit, wherein the at least one measuring assembly has a fiber and a measuring component connected to the fiber, wherein the fiber of the at least one measuring assembly is configured and arranged so as to guide the signal coupled into the at least one measuring assembly in the direction of the measuring component of the at least one measuring assembly, wherein the measuring component: has a fiber Bragg grating or is in the form of a fiber Bragg grating.
2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the measuring component: has one or more crystals or is in the form of one or more crystals; or has one or more fluorescent dyes or is in the form of one or more fluorescent dyes.
3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the connection assembly has: an underground cable coupled with the transmission unit; and an isolator coupled with the underground cable and with the at least one measuring assembly; wherein the transmission unit and the underground cable are coupled with one another such that the signal transmitted by the transmission unit is able to be coupled into the underground cable, the underground cable is configured and arranged so as to guide the coupled-in signal through the underground cable in the direction of the isolator, the isolator has at least one conductor, for example an optical waveguide, and is coupled with the underground cable such that the signal guided through the underground cable in the direction of the isolator is able to be coupled into the at least one conductor of the isolator, the at least one conductor of the isolator is configured and arranged so as to guide the signal coupled into the at least one conductor through the at least one conductor in the direction of the at least one measuring assembly, and the isolator is releasably coupled with the at least one measuring assembly such that the signal guided through the at least one conductor of the isolator in the direction of the at least one measuring assembly is able to be coupled into the at least one measuring assembly.
4. The system as claimed in claim 3, wherein the system further has a connecting device and the connecting device has: a connecting component having at least one fiber which is able to be connected or is connected to the isolator such that the signal guided through the conductor of the isolator is able to be coupled into the at least one fiber of the connecting component; and a plug connected to the connecting component, which plug is configured to establish a releasable connection between the connecting component and the at least one measuring assembly.
5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one measuring assembly is able to be coupled or is coupled with the connection assembly such that the reflected signal is able to be coupled into the connection assembly, the connection assembly is configured and arranged so as to guide the signal coupled into the connection assembly in the direction of the evaluation unit, the connection assembly and the evaluation unit are coupled such that the reflected signal is able to be coupled into the evaluation unit, and the evaluation unit is configured to derive information about the state of the at least one over voltage protection component from the reflected signal.
6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the system has a computing unit connected to the evaluation unit, which computing unit is configured to determine from the information about the state of the at least one over voltage protection component a probability of failure of the at least one over voltage protection component.
7. The system as claimed in claim 6, wherein the computing unit is configured to determine a possible failure of the at least one over voltage protection component if the determined probability of failure of the at least one over voltage protection component exceeds a predetermined limit value and/or if the determined probability of failure of the at least one over voltage protection component differs by a predetermined value from a determined probability of failure of one or more further of the at least one over voltage protection component.
8. The system as claimed in claim 6, wherein the computing unit is configured to warn of the possible failure of the at least one over voltage protection component if the determined probability of failure of the at least one over voltage protection component exceeds a predetermined limit value and/or if the determined probability of failure of the at least one over voltage protection component differs by a predetermined value from a determined probability of failure of one or more further of the at least one over voltage protection component.
9. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the state of the over voltage protection component exhibits a temperature, a tensile stress, a compressive stress and/or a degree of moisture of the over voltage protection component or wherein the state of the over voltage protection component is a temperature, a tensile stress, a compressive stress and/or a degree of moisture of the over voltage protection component.
10. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one over voltage protection component is configured as a plurality of over voltage protection components.
11. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one over voltage protection component has a varistor or is in the form of a varistor, in particular has a metal-oxide varistor or is in the form of a metal-oxide varistor; and/or wherein the signal transmitted by the transmission unit is an optical signal or a digitally modulated signal.
12. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one over voltage protection component is configured for the over voltage protection of a series compensation of a power system, in particular for the over voltage protection of a series-connected capacitor bank of a power system.
13. A method for monitoring the state of at least one over voltage protection component by means of the system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: transmission of a signal by means of the transmission unit; coupling of the transmitted signal into the connection assembly; guiding of the signal coupled into the connection assembly through the connection assembly in the direction of the at least one measuring assembly; coupling of the signal guided via the connection assembly in the direction of the at least one measuring assembly into the at least one measuring assembly; and reflection of the optical signal in or at the at least one measuring assembly in dependence on the state of the at least one over voltage protection component, such that information about the state of the at least one over voltage protection component is able to be derived from the reflected signal by the evaluation unit.
14. (canceled)
15. (canceled)
Description
[0048] The present disclosure will be explained further with reference to figures. These figures show, schematically:
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056] In the following, without being limited thereto, specific details are set out in order to provide a complete understanding of the present disclosure. It will, however, be clear to a skilled person that the present disclosure can be used in other exemplary embodiments which may differ from the details set out hereinbelow. For example, there are described hereinbelow specific configurations and forms of a system, which are not to be regarded as limiting. By way of example, the invention will be described hereinbelow in part in relation to its use with fixed series compensation. The invention is, however, not limited to this application.
[0057] Fixed series compensation (FSC) is a preferred solution for optimizing the efficiency of large power transmission systems. By installing a series capacitive reactance on a long aerial line (typically over 200 km), both the angular deviation and the voltage drop are reduced, which increases the loadability and stability of the line. For the technological solution of series compensation, series-connected capacitors (capacitor banks) are used in transmission lines. The devices are usually accommodated on a platform, which is completely isolated from the voltage system. The capacitor and the over voltage protection are both accommodated on the (steel) platform. The over voltage protection is of particular importance for the design, since the capacitor bank must withstand the transmitted fault current even in the case of a severe, nearby disruption, e.g. a lightning strike in the overhead line. The primary over voltage protection typically contains non-linear varistors, a fast-acting protection device (CapThor) and a rapid shunt switch. The secondary protection is made possible by ground-mounted electronics, which responds to signals of the optical current converter of the high-voltage circuit.
[0058] The over voltage protection has varistors, usually metal-oxide varistors (MOV), stacked one above the other, which form a column, or an arrester. A varistor is an electrical resistor which has a voltage-dependent resistance (variable resistor=varistor). There are varistors based on silicon carbide and metal oxide. The mentioned metal-oxide varistors (MOV) are widely used nowadays.
[0059] If a high voltage occurs in the system, the varistors switch in the transmitting direction and convert this over voltage into heat. Multiple, and usually up to 22, arresters are connected in parallel on an FSC platform, which arresters together is protect the installation from unforeseeable effects. However, the amount of this protective function alone accounts for about 20% of the total system costs. For this reason, attempts are made to reduce the number of arresters if possible. However, there has not hitherto been a reliable possibility for precisely calculating the required quantity of arresters.
[0060] Varistors degrade over the course of their operating time as a result of different effects, such as, for example, the ingress of moisture, local discharges as a result of poor contact between varistors, contamination in the housing, which leads to unsuitable voltage distribution in the varistor stack, and mechanical damage as a result of thermal overloading following a high-current event.
[0061] Varistors are permanently conductive if a critical voltage value is exceeded and must be replaced, since it is otherwise no longer possible to switch on the installation. The varistor in question cannot readily be identified. Long downtimes are therefore to be expected. Monitoring the state of varistors is desirable in order to make an accurate prediction regarding the lifetime and maintenance cycles of an arrester, or of individual varistors.
[0062] Such monitoring of the state of MOVs is at present not reliably possible. Current approaches can be divided into optical, electrical and thermal measurement principles. At present, the only known optical measuring device is the optical-electrical surge counter. This measures the number of excessive increases and provides them with a timestamp. Electrical forms of such counters are likewise known. In the case of electrical measurement principles, leakage current meters, third harmonic current measurement and partial discharge detection can further be distinguished.
[0063] In so-called surge counters, two electrodes are arranged parallel to one another. In the event of activation of an MOV, there is a current flashover between the electrodes, which results in an optical signal which can be measured with an optical fiber and evaluated by a receiver. Since the measurement principle is based on a flashover between the electrodes, it necessarily results in a degradation of the electrode surface. According to the manufacturer's specifications, the electrodes must be replaced in the case of degradation for uninterrupted operation. The measurement takes place optically. The duration and number of the flashovers can also be recorded. However, it is not possible, without unscrewing the device, to determine whether the electrodes are degraded (have holes). A general check of is these measuring devices is further recommended following thunderstorms. The measuring method has a high maintenance outlay for the installed electrodes alone. The maintenance outlay increases when it is considered that the end of the optical fiber also experiences impairment effects in the event of a lightning strike. Furthermore, it is not clear how the end of the optical fiber degrades over time in the case of flashovers (light arcs are an established method for melting optical fibers; the fiber is here exposed to a light arc on each MOV activation). Finally, optical measurement of the flashover does not permit cascading/combining of multiple sensors and a single receiver (the measurement must be carried out continuously in order not to miss a flashover; the measurement window is ms, i.e. an event may possibly be missed when switches are fitted; in the case of cascading, it is not possible to identify which event comes from which arrester, or from which column).
[0064] Leakage current meters are further known. These are measuring devices for determining the leakage current. The leakage current is composed of a resistive current (5-20%, 10 μA-several hundred μA) and a capacitive current (80-95%, 0.2 mA-0.3 mA). Since the leakage current is dominated by the capacitive current, error-free measurement of the resistance current is extremely susceptible to electromagnetic noise in practice. Various compensation methods are used for distinguishing the resistive current from the capacitive current, such as, for example, a constant phase shift method, a modified shift current method, a multi-coefficient compensation method, active power measurement, a least squares method, etc. Most widely used are 1) oscilloscopes with sensitive voltage and resistive current probes and 2) the third harmonic method. Devices are known which identify discharges with amplitudes above 10 A, evaluate the entire leakage current and the resistive current and prepare statistics. The evaluation is based on analysis of the third harmonic. The data can be read out from a distance of 60 m (optionally 120 m), so that the service personnel do not need access authorization to the substation. The device does not need an external power supply since it can be operated by solar cells and the applied electrical field.
[0065] Overall, leakage current meters are relatively inexpensive. However, digital signal processing is necessary. Furthermore, under IEC 60099-5, the use of this method for to calculating the resistance current and online monitoring is actually limited by the electromagnetic noise that occurs. Generally, the measurement results are dependent in part on the type and manner of grounding. Damage to the arrester cannot be concluded directly from the measurement of high resistance currents alone. Additional measurements are necessary.
[0066] Third harmonic current sensors are further known. The non-linear nature of MOVs leads to harmonic frequencies in the spectrum. A voltage characteristic with an ideal sinusoidal profile would not lead to harmonic components of the current intensity. The presence of harmonic components in the voltage characteristic leads to a component of the third harmonic frequency. The harmonic component depends on the amplitude of the resistive current and the degree of non-linearity (function of voltage and temperature). The third harmonic is composed of a capacitive and a resistive current component. Ageing phenomena always lead to an increase in the resistive component. A common method for determining the resistive component of the leakage current is to measure the component of the third harmonic and convert it into the resistive component with a correction factor. However, the current flow through the resistor is dependent on the temperature. Furthermore, complex and expensive technology for online measurement is necessary for the numerical analysis. Finally, digital signal processing is required.
[0067] Partial discharge detectors (partial discharge measurement) are further known. A partial discharge detector detects localized electrical flashovers in solids or liquids, which occur when a high voltage is applied. The charge actually moved is thereby measured in pico-coulombs in dependence on time. The measurement procedure takes into consideration the detection, classification and localization of the discharge. Such measurements are cost-intensive. Portable devices are scarcely available. Distinguishing the discharge from background noise is not a trivial matter. Moreover, partial discharges occur only in wet weather.
[0068] Measurement of the current-voltage characteristic (Vref testing) is further known. An MOV has a characteristic non-linear current-voltage characteristic, which is provided by the manufacturer on handover. This changes over the lifetime of the MOV as a result of ageing of the arrester. Measuring the characteristic and comparing it with the characteristic provided by the manufacturer (measurement at reference voltage Vref at a fixed current intensity) allows the state of ageing to be determined. This procedure is expedient only to measure a single MOV, which must be isolated from the system as a whole. The method is cost-intensive. Access to the installation is necessary.
[0069] Thermal cameras are further known. With a thermal camera, the temperature of an arrester can be determined from a distance of several tens of meters. A difference of about 10° C. between loaded arresters can indicate a fault with an arrester. Thermal cameras are inexpensive and work contactlessly and quickly (no installation necessary). However, an arrester has a thermal signature only when loaded and cannot be evaluated when it is unloaded. Each arrester must be measured individually. Furthermore, the field of view is limited (=limited measuring field (view shielded by surrounding installations). A long-term installation is not available.
[0070] Of the above-mentioned solutions, only the leakage current meter and the surge counter lend themselves to permanently installed state monitoring. However, they have numerous disadvantages, some of which have been mentioned above. There is a need for an improved measuring method and an improved monitoring system.
[0071]
[0072] A plan view of an example of a measuring assembly 40 is shown in
[0073] The measuring component 44 can have a fiber Bragg grating or can be in the form of a fiber Bragg grating. Examples of measurement assemblies 40 having such a fiber Bragg grating are shown, in connection with other components of the system 1, in
[0074] In
[0075] The optical transmission unit 10 and the optical connection assembly 20 (not shown in
[0076] The fiber-optic state monitoring can, as mentioned, be carried out by means of so-called fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) as the measuring component 44. These components have a local refractive index structure (length about 20 mm) which, at a chosen wavelength, reflects and/or transmits an optical signal, such as a laser signal, by a predetermined degree similarly to a mirror. When external influences, such as e.g. tensile stress, compressive stress, temperature or moisture, act on such a component, the degree of reflection or transmission at the chosen wavelength changes measurably. The reflected spectrum or the reflected wavelength range of the optical signal thereby change. This change relative to the normal state can be detected by the evaluation unit 12.
[0077] The fiber-optic sensor system can, as described, be used for measuring the state of one or more MOVs. A metal cylinder having the construction illustrated in
[0078] As an alternative to laying the fiber 42 cylindrically, it is also possible to lay the fiber 42 linearly. In this case, the fiber 42 can be fixed in an additional housing (e.g. a stainless steel tube) in order to decouple the thermally caused tensile stress.
[0079] A fiber-optic measuring method for determining the state, e.g. the temperature, of an over voltage protection component 50, e.g. an MOV, is thus provided. By means of a temperature sensor system, a significant added value in respect of function/ageing monitoring of arresters and predictive maintenance of the installation as a whole can be achieved.
[0080]
[0081] There are further shown in
[0082] Following the optical path from
[0083] The evaluation unit 12 and the transmission unit 10 in
[0084] The underground cable 22 is configured to transmit the optical signal between the transmission unit 10/evaluation unit 12 and the isolator 26. The underground cable 22 is thus configured on the one hand to guide/carry the signal coupled into the underground cable 22 from the transmission unit 10 via the coupling point 14 in the direction of the isolator 26. The underground cable 22 is configured for use outdoors. The underground cable 22 therefore meets requirements of UV resistance, underground layability, freedom from halogen, flame resistance and/or compatibility with the construction products regulation of the European Union (EU) which has in the meantime become binding.
[0085] The isolator 26 is designed for use outdoors. For example, the isolator 26 is in the form of a so-called composite isolator. The isolator 26 further has one or more optical conductors, for example optical waveguides (LWL), which is/are guided through the isolator 26 (not shown separately in
[0086] The isolator 26 is connected to the over voltage protection components 50 via a connecting device 30. The connecting device 30 is designed to be suitable for outdoors. The connecting device 30 further has a sufficient high-voltage resistance. One or more optical conductors, for example LWLs, or optical fibers, which guide(s) the optical signal run inside the connecting device 30.
[0087] The connecting device 30 can be in the form of, for example, a plug connection 30, as is shown by way of example in
[0088] The (water-tight) plug 32 is attached during installation to a type of coupling, which is mounted at the upper end of each over voltage protection component 50. This coupling seals the transition region between the plug 32 and the over voltage protection components 50 so that no function-Impairing moisture is able to penetrate into the over voltage protection components 50 and the optical signal (the light signal) can nevertheless pass through this transition region. In
[0089] In each over voltage protection component 50 there is provided an optical measuring assembly 40. For example, there is a measuring assembly 40 inside each over voltage protection component 50. This measuring assembly 40 is provided e.g. on the input side with a plug 34, which is attached to the coupling internally during production of the respective over voltage protection component 50. From there, an optical fiber 42 which is suitable for high temperatures leads in each case to the measuring component 44 of each measuring assembly 40. Each of the over voltage protection components 50 can have such an optical fiber 42. This optical fiber 42 is embedded with the measuring component 44 in a placeholder of an arrester, which is installed during production of the over voltage protection components 50, for example, between the varistors, for example MOVs or MOV blocks, of the over voltage protection components 50. The state of these MOVs or MOV blocks is monitored. This embedding of the measuring assembly 40, for example of the fiber 42 and/or of the measuring component 44, in the placeholder takes place such that, ideally, no mechanical stress acts/occurs on the measuring assembly 40, in particular the measuring component 44, since the MOVs or MOV blocks are fixed during manufacture of the respective over voltage protection component 50 with pressure, which also acts on the placeholder. However, pressure is also detected by the measuring assembly 40, in particular the measuring component 44. This pressure is not to be measured, however. For example, only the temperature of each MOV or each MOV block or of each over voltage protection component 50 or of each arrester is to be determined, and pressure could thus (dramatically) falsify the measurements.
[0090] The optical signal is changed at the measuring component 44, which can also be referred to as a measurement probe, and reflected back. The reflected optical signal travels on the same path in the other direction to the evaluation unit 12, which by way of example is part of the transmission unit 10. In other words, the measuring component 44 of each of the measurement arrangements 40 (of each of the over voltage protection components 50) is connected to its associated optical fiber 42 such that the optical signal changed and reflected at the respective measuring component 44 in dependence on the state, e.g. the temperature, of the respective over voltage protection component 50 is coupled into the optical fiber 42. The respective optical fiber 42 is configured and arranged so as to guide the reflected optical signal in the direction of the isolator 26. The respective optical fiber 42 is coupled with the isolator 26 such that the reflected optical signal is coupled into the optical conductor, for example LWL, of the isolator 26. The optical conductor, for example LWL, of the isolator 26 is configured and arranged so as to guide the reflected optical signal in the direction of the underground cable 22. The underground cable 22 is configured and arranged so as to guide the reflected optical signal in the direction of the evaluation unit 12. The ground cable 22 is coupled with the evaluation unit 12 such that the reflected optical signal is able to be coupled into the evaluation unit 12. The evaluation unit 12 is configured, for example, to derive information about the state, e.g. the temperature, of the over voltage protection components 50 from the reflected optical signal. The reflected optical signal can thus be read, analyzed and converted into temperature values by the evaluation unit 12. The temperature values can be read out via one or more interfaces and forwarded to the computing unit 70, e.g. a computing center.
[0091] In the computing unit 70, further processing of the data can take place. For example, the data obtained by means of the above-described hardware components can be inputted into software of the computing unit 70. The computing unit compares the measured values of all the monitored over voltage protection components 50 and warns if one or more over voltage protection components 50 are behaving differently than the rest. On the basis of the switching state of at least one optical switch provided in the system 1, it is possible to determine at least approximately the particular over voltage protection component 50 at which the measurement is carried out. The switching state of the optical switch can, for example, precisely identify the over voltage protection component 50 in question. The system 1 can, for example, have such a switch. Alternatively, one such switch can be provided in the system 1 for each arrester. Alternatively such a switch can be provided in the system 1 for each over voltage protection component 50 or for each varistor (e.g. for each MOV). Since the measurement points can be identified, it is also possible to say at least approximately accurately which of the over voltage protection components 50 is behaving extraordinarily and a replacement can be carried out in a targeted manner. This reduces the downtime of the installation considerably. Trends can also be identified and a replacement can be recommended at an early stage in accordance with a schedule. The actual behavior of the over voltage protection components 50 (the layout of which is based on theoretical models) can likewise be specified more precisely on the basis of the software. The number of over voltage protection components 50 to be installed could thereby optionally be reduced. All rules (when and how the software responds and what warning messages or recommendations it outputs) can be defined within the software. Project-specific requirements (which are different each time) can thus be fulfilled and nevertheless there is an added value.
[0092] The state measurement explained above can be summarized in relation to the example of temperature monitoring in the following two steps.
[0093] In a first step, a correlation between the temperature, the current-voltage characteristic and the state (of ageing) of the MOVs can be established by the long-term measurement of the temperature of various types of MOVs. For this purpose, loading tests can be carried out in a targeted manner on MOVs (e.g. electrical discharges), in which the decay curve of the temperature is measured. The curve can be fitted and the fit coefficients for the present MOV types can be determined. Furthermore, the current-voltage characteristics can be determined and the temperature can be measured in dependence on the current intensity. Measured v/a the current intensity, a higher temperature will be established in a more highly aged MOV at a fixed current value than in a less aged MOV. This trend is likewise to be expected for the profile of the voltage.
[0094] In a second step, an evaluation of the state (of health) of the/each MOV can be carried out by means of a correlation of environmental influences (e.g. weather data, lightning strikes) with the measured temperature for known current intensities and voltages on the basis of the data from the first step. Absolute values of the temperature can thereby serve as alarm thresholds. Likewise, a pattern recognition can be carried out with neural networks, which establishes a correlation between events in the system, the weather and the temperature profile. For example, a series of lightning strikes will usually manifest itself in the profile of the temperature of the MOV over time. The data so processed from the computing unit 70 or a memory unit connected to the computing unit 70, such as e.g. a cloud, can be converted into a warning message for the end user. The failure of an entire arrester can thus be avoided. As a result of the predictability of failures, there is a substantial added value.
[0095] Accordingly, a system 1 (measuring system) for monitoring the temperature of over voltage protection components 50 (components at high-voltage level) is provided. The system 1 can be used, for example, for the more efficient layout of FSC installations and also for reducing downtime and for reducing the maintenance outlay of such installations. If such installations fail, the network is inefficient and costs the operator a large amount of money in a very short time. The system 1 accordingly increases the efficiency of FSC installations.
[0096] Furthermore, the number of MOVs in FSC installations is today dimensioned on the basis of very old thermal models. These models are often not realistic or lead to (wholly) over dimensioned installations. The monitoring function provided by the system 1 can help to reduce the dimensioning of the installations. This also leads to increases in efficiency.
[0097] Furthermore, the downtime of medium-voltage installations can be reduced with the system 1. Maintenance intervals can be planned. In the case of defects, the defective component can be identified remotely and the necessary replacement part can be acquired in a planned manner. Overall, this results in considerable efficiency advantages for operators of medium-voltage installations. Such a system 1 may optionally be of interest for insurers, in order to be able to control risks.
[0098] Although the system 1 has been described in relation to such FSC installations, the applicability of the system 1 is not limited thereto. It can also be used, for example, for charging cables in the field of e-mobility. Furthermore, the system 1 can also be used in other fields in which over voltage protection components 50, such as arresters generally or surge arresters in particular, are used. There too, the system 1 can be used for state monitoring. A further example is measurement of the temperature of other electrical components in the high-voltage (HV) field with a planar surface.