THERMOFORMED POLYMERIC ARTICLES CONTAINING AN ADDITIVE

Abstract

The properties of a thermoformed polymeric article are modified by incorporation of an additive in a thermoplastic/thermoplastic elastic host matrix. The additive comprises a polydispersed hyperbranched polymer (HBP) or a branched monodispersed dendritic polymer (DP). The HBP or DP is linked to a plurality of oligomer chains. The additive migrates to the surface of the article during the thermoforming process.

Claims

1. A method for producing a thermoformed article with enhanced properties, the method comprising the steps of: introducing an additive into a host polymer to form a polymer/additive composition; and thermoforming the polymer/additive composition into the article so that the additive migrates to the surface of the thermoformed article, the additive comprising a polydispersed hyperbranched polymer (HBP) having at least two reactive groups, the polydispersed hyperbranched polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains; or a branched monodispersed dendritic polymer (DP) having at least two reactive groups, the branched monodispersed dendritic polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the thermoforming is effected by extrusion forming.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the extrusion forming comprises use of a single screw extruder or a twin screw extruder.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising forcing the molten mixture through a die.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising the step of heat treating the thermoformed article.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the heat treatment is carried out at a temperature between room temperature and the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the host polymer.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1 comprising the step of blending the additive with the host polymer prior to thermoforming.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein blending is selected from the group comprising: mixing; melt blending including extrusion compounding; and solution blending comprising mixing said host polymer with said additive in a mutual solvent followed by dispersion blending.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the additive comprises greater than 30 carbon atoms.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the polydispersed hyperbranched polymer or the monodispersed dendritic polymer have short cores with two or more reactive groups and six or more reactive peripheral groups linked to a plurality of short oligomers, OA, where A represents a monomer.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the polydispersed hyperbranched polymer or the monodispersed dendritic polymer have short cores with two or more reactive groups and six or more reactive peripheral groups linked to a number of short oligomers, OA, OC, where A and C each represent a monomer, present in a ratio OA:OC of from 1:100 to 100:1.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the additive comprises a core linear chain.

13. A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the core linear chain comprises at least one reactive group.

14-27. (canceled)

28. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the host polymer is a polymer selected from one or more of the group comprising polyolefins, polystyrenes, polyesters, polyamides polyethers, polysulfones, polycarbonates, polyureas, polyurethanes, polysiloxanes and thermoplastic polymers including blends of thermoplastic polymers with other thermoplastics or copolymers or blends thereof and thermoplastic elastomers including blends of thermoplastic polymers with other thermoplastics or copolymers or blends thereof.

29-40. (canceled)

41. An additive for a thermoformable polymer matrix comprising: a polydispersed hyperbranched polymer (HBP) having at least two reactive groups, the polydispersed hyperbranched polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains; or a branched monodispersed dendritic polymer (DP) having at least two reactive groups, the branched monodispersed dendritic polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains.

42. An additive as claimed in claim 41 wherein the HBP or DP has greater than 30 carbon atoms.

43-80. (canceled)

81. A thermoformed article comprising a host polymer and an additive comprising: a polydispersed hyperbranched polymer (HBP) having at least two reactive groups, the polydispersed hyperbranched polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains; or a branched monodispersed dendritic polymer (DP) having at least two reactive groups, the branched monodispersed dendritic polymer being linked to a plurality of oligomer chains, wherein a surface of the article is enriched in the additive with respect to a bulk of the article.

82-85. (canceled)

86. A thermoformed article as claimed in claim 81 wherein the article is a medical device.

87-88. (canceled)

89. A thermoformed article as claimed in claim 81 wherein a surface property selected from one or more of surface tension, surface energy, anti-microbial, anti-thrombogenic, anti-inflammatory, and radiopacity is modified compared to the surface property of the host polymer without the additive.

90. A thermoformed article as claimed in claim 81 wherein the host polymer is a polymer selected from one or more of the group comprising polyolefins, polystyrenes, polyesters, polyamides, polyethers, polysulfones, polycarbonates, polyureas, polyurethanes, polysiloxanes and thermoplastic polymers including blends of thermoplastic polymers with other thermoplastics or copolymers or blends thereof and thermoplastic elastomers including blends of thermoplastic polymers with other thermoplastics or copolymers or blends thereof.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0134] The invention will be more clearly understood from the following description of some embodiments thereof, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0135] FIG. 1(a) shows the various classes of dendritic polymers, categorised according to the dispersion in their frameworks (i.e.) mono or poly;

[0136] FIG. 1 (b) shows a hyperbranched structure having a branched core with customisable chain periphery;

[0137] FIG. 2 shows the resultant molecular structures of the branched hybrid formed when for (i and ii) a branched polymer component (B) is connected to multiple short oligomers (O.sub.A or/and O.sub.C) as well as structures (iii to vii) which also include long linear polymer component(s) (A), where the number of reactive groups is 1 or more, are reacted during chemical synthesis. Resultant structures include: [0138] i. a generic (B)O.sub.A Hyperstar polymer comprising of monodisperse or polydisperse branched components with short cores with functionality of 2 or more and 6 or more reactive perpherial groups linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A); [0139] ii. a generic (B)O.sub.A O.sub.C Hyperstar polymer comprising of monodisperse or polydisperse branched components with short cores with functionality of 2 or more and 6 or more reactive perpherial groups are linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A) and small, short oligomer C chains (O.sub.C); where the ratio of O.sub.A oligomers, x, to O.sub.C oligomers, y, is between 1-99%; [0140] iii. a generic (AB)O.sub.A block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A) which is monosubstituted to a branched polymer component of either monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups, which in turn is linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A); [0141] iv. a generic (BAB)O.sub.A block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A), which is di-substituted to two branched polymer components of either a monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups, which in turn are linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A); [0142] v. a generic (AB.sub.4)O.sub.A block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A), which is tetra-substituted to four branched polymer components of either monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups which in turn are linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A); [0143] vi. a generic (AB)(O.sub.A), (O.sub.C).sub.y block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A), which is monosubstituted to a branched polymer component of either monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups which in turn is linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A) and small, short oligomer C chains (O.sub.C); where the ratio of O.sub.A oligomers, x, to O.sub.C, oligomers, y, is between 1-99%; [0144] vii. a generic (BAB)O.sub.A block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A), which is di-substituted to two branched polymer components of either a monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups, which in turn are linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A) and small, short oligomer C chains (O.sub.C); where the ratio of O.sub.A oligomers, x, to O.sub.C oligomers, y, is between 1-99%; [0145] viii. a generic (AB.sub.4)O.sub.A).sub.x(O.sub.C).sub.y block copolymer comprising of a longer, linear chain (A), which is tetra-substituted to four branched polymer components of either monodisperse or polydisperse structure with 2 or more reactive groups which in turn are linked to small, short oligomer A chains (O.sub.A) and small, short oligomer C chains (O.sub.C); where the ratio of O.sub.A oligomers, x, to O.sub.C oligomers, y, is between 1-99%;

[0146] FIG. 3 shows a thermoformed article made with a blended material whereby the matrix material forms the bulk of the article and the branched material with specific terminal groups has migrated to the surface, with a concentration profile from the bulk to the surface and at the surface of the article:

[0147] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a compounder/extruder having mixing screws and a heated plate/die which the molten polymer is forced through, resulting in the final thermoformed article;

[0148] FIGS. 5(A)-5(D) illustrate examples of commercially available (from Polymer Factory AB of Sweden) hyperbranched polymers: [0149] Polyester Based Hyperbranched Polymers [0150] (A) Boltorn U3000 a lipophilic, fatty acid modified dendritic polymer, esterified with 14 unsaturated fatty acids derived from sunflower oil consisting of C16 and/or C18 fatty acids, showing the compact nature of the molecular structure [0151] Polyester Amide Based Hyperbranched Polymers [0152] (B) Hybrane S1200 built on succinic anhydride and diisopropanol amine with secondary hydroxyl end groups. [0153] (C) Hybrane D2800 built on dodecenyl succinic anhydride and diisopropanol amine with secondary hydroxyl end groups. [0154] (D) Hybrane DEO7508500 built on dodecenyl succinic anhydride and diisopropanol amine with polyethylene glycol end groups, with all three materials again presenting a compact molecular structure;

[0155] FIG. 6(a) shows a comparison of the chemical composition of the inner surface of three extrusions: (X) a high density polyethylene (HDPE) control extrusion, was compared against (Y) Tube A, an extrusion containing a wt. % of H40 Boltorn hyperbranched polyester and (Z) Tube B, an extrusion with a wt. % of PS2550 Hybrane hyperbranched polyester amine. The analyses was carried out using XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy), a technique which measures the chemical composition within a surface depth of nanometers, whereby the nitrogen in the hyperbranched polyester amine acted like a marker enabling the migration of the hyperbranched additive during the thermoforming process to be tracked;

[0156] FIG. 6(b) shows (ii) a further analysis of both the inner and outer surfaces of Tube B (locations on the extruded tubing are indicated in panel (iii)) showing the presence of nitrogen (N) (a constituent of the hyperbranched polyester amine which is not present in HDPE) at both residing surfaces and not in the bulk of the extrusion, (location of which again are indicated in panel (iii)).

[0157] FIG. 7(A) is an AFM.sup.1 image, obtained in Tapping Mode, showing a homogeneous, single phase morphology for the pure, extruded HDPE polymer matrix, the Control Tube in FIG. 6(a); .sup.1 Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), a microscope without lenses, operates through interaction between a mechanical probe and the surface of the sample. Using Tapping Mode, it can map the spatial variation in surface elasticity using a method termed as Phase Imaging. This technique can show microstructural properties of polymer blends, based on their relative elasticity and are hence useful for demonstrating the degree of miscibility between polymer blend phases.

[0158] FIG. 7(B) is an AFM image, again obtained in Tapping Mode, of a HDPE matrix containing a wt. % of hyperbranched polyester polymer, Tube A in FIG. 6(a), showing a phase separated morphology, where the blends are essentially immiscible or incompatible;

[0159] FIG. 8 exhibits a comparison of Ultimate Tensile Strengths (UTS) of a tube/ISO594 luer overmould bond for Control Tube, Tube A, and Tube B (left hand side of the graph) and the inherent UTS of each Tube extrusion, tested to destruction (right hand side of the graph);

[0160] FIG. 9(a) shows the building blocks, branching units and end-capping species used to produce the hyperbranched polyester amide, DEO7508500 where the resultant structure of the Hybrane DEO7508500 includes functional hydrophilic methoxy-terminated PEG terminal groups with a hydrophobic core is shown in FIG. 5(D);

[0161] FIG. 9(b) shows a comparison of the Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves for the HDPE control (Marlex virgin HDPE) and DNT750PE (HDPE host matrix with a 6 wt. % of DEO7508500) showing the heat of enthalpy (H) (J/g) and melting temperature (T.sub.m) ( C.) for both;

[0162] FIG. 10 is a graph which compares the dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) obtained for compressed sheets () made from the control HDPE matrix and DNT750PE (HDPE host matrix with a 6 wt. % of DEO7508500), with extruded sheets () made from the control HDPE matrix and DNT750PE (HDPE host matrix with a 6 wt. % of DEO7508500). Each set of samples (i.e.) compressed and extruded, where compared with compressed and extruded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sheeting, which was tested twice, each time the test was set up. The tests were carried out using the ISO test standard ASTM D1894. The extruded sheets were produced according to the thermoforming extrusion parameters; feed rate and screw speed, exhibited in Table 2;

[0163] FIGS. 11(a) and 11(b) show the building blocks, branch species and linear chains used to produce the customised branched hybrid polymer called Factor DNT022;

[0164] FIG. 11(c) shows the resultant molecular structure arising from the reaction represented in FIG. 11(b) producing an additive with a core linear PEG chain (in this case 6 k, where 6 k refers to the average molecular weight of the polymer) connected to short PEG oligomer chains via a branched polymer component in the form of a polyester HBP of G3 (G=Generation, the number of consecutive branching points);

[0165] FIG. 12(a) shows a .sup.13C NMR spectra confirming the absence of free reactant, carboxylic acid functionalised methoxyl polyethylene glycol acid (m-PEG750COOH), the end-capping ingredient or OH groups in the final DNT022 material, indicating that the branched polymer component (G3) links the terminal PEG oligomers elements;

[0166] FIG. 12(b) is a graph showing a comparison of the gel permeation chromatography (GPC) curves confirming peglation of the branched hybrid DNT022 (6kG3);

[0167] FIG. 13(a) is a graph which shows the difference in the quantity of the ether (COC, a constituent of PEG chains) peak at 1117 cm.sup.1, as measured by Raman Spectroscopy present at the surface of the PEBAX.sup.2 control compared with DNT022PX sheets. The DNT022PX sheets exhibited a peak 8.4% bigger than that in PEBAX sheets, whilst the same peak increased in intensity by 21% following immersion in deionised water; .sup.2 PEBAX Polyether block amide is a thermoplastic elastomer made of flexible polyether and rigid polyamide. The non-limiting grade chosen in this example (7233 SA 01 MED) is specially designed to meet the stringent requirements of the medical applications such as minimally invasive devices.

[0168] FIG. 13(b) is a graph which shows the dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) (according to ASTM D1894-11) of the sheets measured following immersion in deionised water, demonstrating a .sub.d for DNT022PX lower than that obtained for both the PEBAX control and PTFE sheets.

[0169] FIG. 14 is a graph which shows size exclusion chromatography (SEC) data for a starter material of a larger methoxyl polyethylene glycol acid (m-PEG750COOH (PEG20k-G3-OH)) and the final material (PEG-20k-G3-PEG) showing an expected increase in molecular weight at the end of the reaction, again confirming, the conversion of OH groups to -MPEG groups. This data, together with the information presented in FIGS. 12(a)-12(b), indicates the ability to convert OH terminal groups to -MPEG groups for a range of linear-dendritic hyperbranched polymers;

[0170] FIG. 15(a) presents a theoretical conformational structure of a Boltorn H.sub.2O P with a 4 functional core connected to G3 hyperbranched structures;

[0171] FIG. 15(b) shows the corresponding theoretical molecular structure of Boltorn H.sub.2O P;

[0172] FIG. 15(c) presents a theoretical conformational structure of a pegylated linear dendritic (L-D) hyperbranched PEG attached to linear 2 functional cores connected to hyperbranched structures with various potential generations. Comparing FIGS. 15(a) and 15(c) demonstrates the compact nature of the Boltorn based hyperbranched polymer verses the larger L-D hyperbranched structure;

[0173] FIG. 15(d) shows the corresponding theoretical molecular structure of two pegylated L-D hyperbranched PEG additives comprising of a linear core of Xk length connected to two hyperbranched structures with two functional cores each, extending to a generation number of 3 or 5. These images illustrate the differences in size of various additive combinations;

[0174] FIG. 16(a) is a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) graph for PEG 10kG3;

[0175] FIG. 16(b) is a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) graph for PEG 6kG5;

[0176] FIG. 16(c) is a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) graph for Boltorn H20P;

[0177] FIG. 17(a) is a graph which shows a comparison of both static coefficient of friction (.sub.d) () and dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) () for PEBAX Control, modified 6kG3PX sheet (<5 wt. %) and modified 6kG5PX sheet (<5 wt. %);

[0178] FIG. 17(b) is a graph which compares the dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) results of PTFE and PEBAX 7233 control with <5% additions of Boltorn H20 P, 10kG3 and 10kG5 to a PEBAX host matrix;

[0179] FIG. 17(c) shows both .sub.s () and .sub.d (), obtained for an extruded control PEBAX 7223 sheet and each of the listed additives in a PEBAX 7233 sheet at <5%, tested according to ASTM D1894-11 with water are presented;

[0180] FIG. 18(a) is a graph which shows further evidence of the influence of the length of the core linear chain, across a range from 6 k, 10 k to 20 k, for both G3 () and G5 () based linear dendritic hyperbranched additives in the PEBAX 7233 host matrix on the static coefficient of friction (.sub.s) compared to that obtained for the PEBAX 7233 virgin control and PTFE;

[0181] FIG. 18(b) similarly demonstrates the influence of length of the core linear chain for both G3 () and G5 () based linear dendritic hyperbranched additives in a PEBAX 7233 host matrix on the dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) compared to the PEBAX 7233 host virgin control matrix and PTFE;

[0182] FIG. 19(a) is a bar chart which compares the results of elution tests conducted on control HDPE and PEBAX extruded sheets to HDPE and PEBAX extruded sheets with hyperbranched additives using human dermo fibroblasts; and

[0183] FIG. 19(b) is a bar chart which compares the results of elution tests conducted with control HDPE and PEBAX extruded sheets to HDPE and PEBAX extruded sheets with hyperbranched additives using mouse macrophage.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0184] The particular values and configurations discussed in these non-limiting examples can be varied and are cited merely to illustrate embodiments of the disclosed compositions and methods and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.

[0185] A molecule is made up of a group of atoms bonded together, representing the smallest fundamental unit of a chemical compound that can take part in a chemical reaction. A monomer is a molecule that can bind chemically to other molecules to form long chains called polymers. In general, linear polymers can comprise two terminal end groups with a repeating unit between the ends, with an oligomer comprising a molecule of intermediate relative molecular mass, the structure of which essentially comprises a small plurality of units derived, actually or conceptually, from molecules of lower relative molecular mass. Branching on a linear polymer occurs by the replacement of a substituent, (e.g.) a hydrogen atom, on a monomer sub-unit, by another covalently bonded chain of that polymer; or, in the case of a graft copolymer, by a chain of another type.

[0186] Branching is also employed in dendritic polymers, where the structure comprises a core surrounded by at least two or a larger number of monomers that branch outwards. Dendritic polymers are typically split into two distinct categories based on the perfection or otherwise of their structure, as illustrated in FIG. 1(a). Monodisperse frameworks are perfect structures (perfectly symmetrical) and include dendrimers and dendrons. Polydisperse frameworks are made up of imperfect structures (not perfectly symmetrical), like hyperbranched polymers, dendigraphs and linear-dendritic hybrids, which are by definition block co-polymers.

[0187] The periphery or outer shell of these dendritic structures comprises of multiple small reactive groups that can be post-modified with specific substituents, which may provide a desired property to the branched polymer. Due to the multiple representation of peripheral groups the post functionalisation enables the design of a dendritic polymer that exhibits intrinsically different properties from the unmodified pre-polymer. The final property of a dendritic material is reflected by its building blocks i.e. core, monomers and peripheral groups. In its essence the dendritic polymer is a compact, soft nanoparticle polymer that is highly branched, and unlike linear polymers, which are subjected to inter- and intramolecular entanglements due to their random coil conformation, dendritic polymer typically experience little to no entanglements. By carefully selecting the core, the set of monomers as well as peripheral groups, a layered branched polymer is achieved.

[0188] Polyester hyperbranched polymers are known and are commercially available under the brand name Boltorn. Hybranes are commercially available hyperbranched polyesteramides. The generic structure for both is shown in FIG. 1(b), having a central hydrophobic core with many terminal end groups. Such polymers have been used to modify the surface of moulded parts.

[0189] Dendrimers typically exhibit layered and heterogeneous properties with core-shell features, which adapt conformation to the surrounding environment. When this environment is within a bulk polymer matrix, the inherent properties of the dendritic structure, coupled with its constrained geometry and lack of entanglements allow it to act as a mode of transportation adapting to its environs as it migrates. This constrained structural conformation aids in its travel through the host polymer matrix as it has less obstacles to compete with when compared to a linear polymer, which is subjected to both random coil configuration and entanglement in the bulk polymer matrix. Additionally, polar heterogeneity between the host polymer matrix and the branched hybrid polymer also may influence the migration of the branched hybrid polymer through the host polymer. As this incompatibility increases in magnitude, the concentration gradient of the branched polymer additive at the host polymer matrix surface/air interface is expected to increase.

[0190] A branched polymer with short cores of a functionality of 2 or more and 6 or more reactive peripheral groups linked to oligomer chains or core linear polymers linked to smaller oligomers via branched components producing an (A)(B)(A) structure have not previously been described. The branched polymer component may include either a monodispersed dendritic polymer or polydispersed hyperbranched polymer. Aspects of the present disclosure include reacting such branched polymer components with linear polymers and a plurality of oligomers to produce a branched polymer hybrid of structure (A)(B)(A). The linear and oligomer chains are selected in order to achieve a desired property at the surface of the final solid article, e.g., final solid polymer substrate.

[0191] Accordingly aspects of this invention include a platform branched hybrid polymer (components of which include linear polymer chains, small oligomer chains, and branched polymers of either a polydispersed hyperbranched or a monodispersed dendritic nature), which is in turn blended in a host polymer. These platform branched hybrid polymers may be utilized as a vehicle to transport specific, small, functionalized chains of the branched hybrid polymers to the surface/air interface of the thermoformed. matrix polymer article, delivering a concentration gradient that may provide a selected surface property to the thermoformed article as diagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 3.

[0192] The terms host polymer, matrix polymer and host polymer matrix as detailed herein means a polymer that forms the bulk constituent of the thermoformed article.

[0193] The term linear polymer detailed herein means a polymer having a linear chain structure or backbone. In at least one example, the linear polymer may be selected from the group consisting of: [0194] poly(methylacrylate)s, polyesters, poly(alkylene diol)s, poly(alkylene diol monoalkyl ethers, poly(aryl ether)s, poly(vinyl alcohol)s, poly(acrylamide)s, poly(urea)s, poly(urethane)s, poly(methacrylamide)s, poly(ethylene imine)s, poly(ethylene glycol), poly(vinyl ether)s, poly(vinyl ester)s, poly(epichlorohydrin), poly(glycidyl ether)s, poly(glycidyl ester)s, poly(carbonate)s, poly(thio ether)s, poly(thio ester)s, polyamides, epoxy resins, novalac resins and quaternary ammonium polyacrylates and polyamines; succinc anhydrides, triglycerides and saturated fatty acids, for example, but not limited to, behenic/docosanoic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, silicon based polymer compounds, for example, but not limited to poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) and fluorine based polymer compounds, for example, but not limited to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE), perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), hexafluoropropylene (HFP), and combinations thereof.

[0195] The term oligomer as detailed herein refers to the IUPAC definition of: [0196] An oligomeric or polymeric offshoot from a macromolecular chain.

[0197] Notes: [0198] 1. An oligomeric branch may be termed a short-chain branch. [0199] 2. A polymeric branch may be termed a long-chain branch. [0200] and detailed herein is an oligomer selected from the group consisting of: [0201] poly(methylacrylate)s, polyesters, poly(alkylene diol)s, poly(alkylene diol monoalkyl ethers, poly(aryl ether)s, poly(vinyl alcohol)s, poly(acrylamide)s, poly(urea)s, poly(urethane)s, poly(methacrylamide)s, poly(ethylene imine)s, poly(ethylene glycol), poly(vinyl ether)s, poly(vinyl ester)s, poly(epichlorohydrin), poly(glycidyl ether)s, poly(glycidyl ester)s, poly(carbonate)s, poly(thio ether)s, poly(thio ester)s, polyamides, epoxy resins, novalac resins and quaternary ammonium polyacrylates and polyamines; succinc anhydrides, triglycerides and saturated fatty acids, for example, but not limited to, behenic/docosanoic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, silicon based polymer compounds, for example, but not limited to poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) and fluorine based polymer compounds, for example, but not limited to PTFE, ETFE, PFA, PFOA, PVDF, HFP, and combinations thereof.

[0202] The term branched polymer component as detailed herein refers to: [0203] hyperbranched polymers meaning polydispersed frameworks containing chain architectures with multiple branches, with many terminal groups, joined together in a compact but irregular (non-symmetrical) way. [0204] dendrimer meaning monodispersed frameworks containing a chain architecture that is perfectly (symmetrically) branched, having a tree-like structure, usually more than 2 generations. The generation of a branched polymer refers to the number of consecutive branching points. For example, a third generation branched polymer refers to a polymer with three consecutive branching points.

[0205] The terms active agents and bound agents detailed herein include adjuvants selected from the group consisting of: [0206] antimicrobial agents (which may be bound to a dendritic polymer) including but not limited to zinc oxide compounds, silver compounds, benzimidazole derivatives, hydrochloric acid, a taurinamide derivative, a phenol, quaternary ammonium surfactant, chlorine-containing, quinoline, quinaldinium, lactone, dye, thiosemicarbazone, quinone, sulfa, carbamates, urea, salicylamide, carbanilide, amide, guanide, amidine, chelate, imidazoline biocides, acetic acid, benzoic acid, sorbic acid, propionic acid, boric acid, dehydroacetic acid, sulfurous acid, vanillic acid, esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, ethanol, isopropanol, propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol, phenylethyl alcohol. 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, calcium hypochlorite, potassium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite, iodine (in various solvents), povidone-iodine, hexamethylenetetramine, noxythiolin, 1-(3-choroallyl)-3,5,7-triazo 1-azoniaadamantane chloride, taurolidine, taurultam, EDTA, N(5-nitro-2-furfurylidene)-1-amino-hydantoin, 5-nitro-2-furaldehyde semicarbazone, 3,4,4-trichlorocarbanilide, 3,4,5-tribromosalicylanilide, salicylanilide, 3-trifluoromethyl-4,4-dichlorocarbanilide, 8-hydroxyquinoline, 1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid, 1,4-dihydro-1-ethyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, phenol, sodium oxychlorosene, parachlorometaxylenol, 2,4,4-trichloro-T-hydroxydiphenol, thymol, chlorhexidine, benzalkonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, silver, nanosilver, silver sulfadiazine, silver nitrate, 5 fluorouracil, phenolic antiseptics, gentian violet, methylene blue, brilliant green, and bismuth compounds; [0207] anticoagulant agents including but not limited to di-ammonium hydrogen citrate, di-ammonium tartrate, N-(2-bis(carboxymethyl)aminoethyl)-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)glycin salt dihydrate, citric acid, citric acid disodium salt, citric acid monopotassium salt, citric acid monosodium salt, citric acid tripotassium salt, citric acid trisodium salt, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), EDTA diammonium salt, EDTA dipotassium salt, EDTA disodium salt, EDTA tetrasodium salt, ethylenebis(oxyethylenenitrilo)tetraacetic acid (EGTA), EDTA trisodium salt, EDTA tripotassium salt, ethylene glycol-O,O-bis(2-aminoethyl)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N,N-triacetic acid trisodium salt, nitrilotriacetic acid, potassium sodium tartrate, potassium hydrogen D-tartrate, L-tartaric acid dipotassium salt, L-tartaric acid disodium salt, L-tartaric acid monosodium salt, tris(carboxymethyl)amine, heparin, warfarin, acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, prostaglandins, sulfinpyrazone, streptokinase, urokinase, tissue plasminogen activator, coumarin, protamine sulfate, anti-thrombin III, Coumadin, protein C/protein S, nicoumalone, phenprocoumon, hirudin, hirulog, glycosaminoglycans, and mixtures of the foregoing; antibacterial agents that interfere with the growth and reproduction of bacteria, with a function of disinfecting, surfaces and eliminating potentially harmful bacteria; or [0208] antibiotic agents with the function of treating bacterial infections.

[0209] The term loaded agents detailed herein means either [0210] antimicrobial agents bound to a dendritic polymer including but not limited to zinc oxide compounds, silver compounds, benzimidazole derivatives, hydrochloric acid, a taurinamide derivative, a phenol, quaternary ammonium surfactant, chlorine-containing, quinoline, quinaldinium, lactone, dye, thiosemicarbazone, quinone, sulfa, carbamates, urea, salicylamide, carbanilide, amide, guanide, amidine, chelate, imidazoline biocides, acetic acid, benzoic acid, sorbic acid, propionic acid, boric acid, dehydroacetic acid, sulfurous acid, vanillic acid, esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid, ethanol, isopropanol, propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol, phenylethyl alcohol, 2-bromo-2-nitropropan-1,3-diol, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, calcium hypochlorite, potassium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite, iodine (in various solvents), povidone-iodine, hexamethylenetetramine, noxythiolin, 1-(3-choroallyl)-3,5,7-triazo 1-azoniaadamantane chloride, taurolidine, taurultam, EDTA, N(5-nitro-2-furfurylidene)-1-amino-hydantoin, 5-nitro-2-furaldehyde semicarbazone, 3,4,4-trichlorocarbanilide, 3,4,5-tribromosalicylanilide, salicylanilide, 3-trifluoromethyl-4,4-dichlorocarbanilide, 8-hydroxyquinoline, 1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid, 1,4-dihydro-1-ethyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, phenol, sodium oxychlorosene, parachlorometaxylenol, 2,4,4-trichloro-2-hydroxydiphenol, thymol, chlorhexidine, benzalkonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, silver, nanosilver, silver sulfadiazine, silver nitrate, 5 fluorouracil, phenolic antiseptics, gentian violet, methylene blue, brilliant green, and bismuth compounds; [0211] anticoagulant agents including but not limited to di-ammonium hydrogen citrate, di-ammonium tartrate, N-(2-bis(carboxymethyl)aminoethyl)-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)glycin salt dihydrate, citric acid, citric acid disodium salt, citric acid monopotassium salt, citric acid monosodium salt, citric acid tripotassium salt, citric acid trisodium salt, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), EDTA diammonium salt, EDTA dipotassium salt, EDTA disodium salt, EDTA tetrasodium salt, ethylenebis(oxyethylenenitrilo)tetraacetic acid (EGTA), EDTA trisodium salt, EDTA tripotassium salt, ethylene glycol-O,O-bis(2-aminoethyl)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N,N-triacetic acid trisodium salt, nitrilotriacetic acid, potassium sodium tartrate, potassium hydrogen D-tartrate, L-tartaric acid dipotassium salt, L-tartaric acid disodium salt, L-tartaric acid monosodium salt, tris(carboxymethyl)amine, heparin, warfarin, acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, prostaglandins, sulfinpyrazone, streptokinase, urokinase, tissue plasminogen activator, coumarin, protamine sulfate, anti-thrombin III, Coumadin, protein C/protein S, nicoumalone, phenprocoumon, hirudin, hirulog, glycosaminoglycans, and mixtures of the foregoing; [0212] antibacterial agents that interfere with the growth and reproduction of bacteria, with a function of disinfecting surfaces and eliminating potentially harmful bacteria; or [0213] antibiotic agents with the function of treating bacterial infections.

[0214] The step of blending the additive with the host polymer prior to thermoforming may, for example, be selected from the group consisting of mixing, melt blending, solution blending, and/or mixing said host polymer with said additive in a mutual solvent followed by dispersion blending and extrusion compounding.

[0215] Though the thermoforming of the present invention is not particularly limited, it may be effected by extrusion forming, multilayer extrusion forming, profile extrusion forming and the like means, utilising either a twin or single screw and a die through which the molten polymer composition is forced to form a continuous shaped article or product. Press forming and vacuum press forming may also be utilised to produce specially formed products, whereby the polymer in a solid form is formed under pressure. In contrast, injection moulding is a manufacturing process for producing parts by injecting material into a mould. Crystalline based polymers may be formed at temperatures approximately in the region of 10 to 40 C. above of their respective melting points, whilst amorphous materials may be formed at approximate temperatures in the region of 80 to 150 C. above of their respective glass transition temperature range. The product produced from each of these thermoforming methods may have surfaces enriched in the additive.

[0216] Downstream and upstream equipment utilised in the extrusion compounding and forming processes can include drying systems, gravimetric dosing and feeding systems, vacuum calibration/cooling water bath, haul-off systems and in-line measurement systems.

[0217] The articles herein can be manufactured by moulding of thermoplastic material (e.g., polymer/additive composition) in a mould and/or extruding the thermoplastic material through a customised extrusion die. The amount of shear the polymer melt experiences is controlled during either process to ensure a maximum concentration of additives resides at the resultant solid polymer surfaces.

BoltornsHyperbranched Polyesters

[0218] Boltorn is a family of polyester hyperbranched materials that are generated through pseudo one-pot polycondensations of AB.sub.2 monomer named 2,2-bismethylol propionic acid (bis-MPA) and from a multifunctional core, typically tetra-functional. The obtained hyperbranched polymer comprises a hydrophobic interior and hydrophilic hydroxyl functional outer layer. These commercially available materials are trademarked, with species including H20 through to H40, with structures as represented by FIG. 1 (b), depending on the generation/degree of branching. In contrast to Hybrane with multiple ester/amide bonds, the Boltorn species consist of a great number of interior esters and large number of peripheral hydroxyl groups, independent of pseudo generation. The Boltorn skeleton does not garner the necessary hydrophilicity required to solubilize in water nor are they sufficiently hydrophobic to dissolve in hydrophobic solvents (e.g.) ethyl acetate, ether etc. Therefore, to alter the properties of Boltorn materials, a more defined dendritic core-shell skeleton can be achieved by postfunctionalisation, e.g., chemical modification, with appropriate substituents. Such postfunctionalisation may result in commercially available products such as lipophilic U3000 (see FIG. 5(A)) with unsaturated fatty acid. These qualities alter the polar nature of the specific Boltorn species to be more soluble in less polar solvents. However, the overall polarity obtained with such a hydrophobic core, coupled with the currently available substituents of (a) fatty acids and/or (b) PEGs, do not alter the final characteristics of the polymer enough to yield the necessary combination of (a) heterogeneous structural configuration, (b) incompatibility with the host matrix and (c) amphiphilic, incompatible nature necessary to deliver a compact core-shell nanoparticle to the surface of a thermoformed article with the necessary surface characteristics.

HybranesPolyesteramides

[0219] Hybrane is a family of polyesteramide hyperbranched materials that is grown through a polycondensation reaction between diisopropanelamine (DTPA) and a selected cyclic anhydride. The final property of the typically hydroxyl functional Hybrane is directly correlated to the careful selection of the anhydride monomer. This ability to tune the properties of Hybrane based HBP is demonstrated by considering the water solubility of the following three examples (1) S1200, (2) D2800 and (3) DEO7508500 (see FIG. 5(B)-FIG. 5(D)). (1) With Hybrane S1200, the choice of succinic anhydride as a component confers its water solubility as a consequence of (a) the peripheral hydroxyl groups combined with (b) the aliphatic amide bonds available in the interior. (2) Conversely, by choosing dodecenyl succinic anhydride the obtained Hybrane (D2800) is water insoluble even though peripheral hydroxyl groups are present. This is due to the overwhelming hydrophobicity that comes from the dodecenyl groups with shield the aliphatic amide bonds from interacting with water through secondary forces, thus preventing water solubility. (3) However, the replacement of the hydroxyl groups in D2800 with short polyethylene glycol groups produces an amphiphilic polymer, as present in Hybrane (DEO7508000), which is also water soluble. The DEO7508000 represents a core-shell structure which enables it to adapt its conformation depending on its surrounding.

EXAMPLES

[0220] The following examples are intended to illustrate various aspects of the present disclosure without, however, being limiting, in nature. It is understood that the present disclosure encompasses additional embodiments and features consistent with the foregoing description and following examples.

Example 1 Extruded Tubes

[0221] Six percent Boltorn H40 (a hyperbranched polyester) and six percent Hybrane PS2550 (hyperbranched polyester amine) were separately compounded with a Marlex 5502 HDPE as the host matrix in a 100K clean room using a Leistritz twin screw extrudera ZSE 27 MAXX40 L/Da 27 mm diameter, 40 L/D twin screw compounder fed by up to 4 K-Tron gravimetric dosing unit and downstream with a 4-hole strand die, feeding a Rieter pelletising unit. The standard medium shear screw configuration was used with no melt filtration as standard. The permissible tolerance for each feeder during production was 1.0% of the addition rate. Subsequently, each polymer blend was extruded to the dimensions listed in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Dimensional specifications applied during the extrusion process. Dimensions in mm Inner diameter (ID) 0.091 0.002 2.31 0.051 Outer diameter (OD) 0.130 0.0025 3.30 0.063 Wall Thickness (REF) 0.0195 0.00125 0.495 0.032 Length 59.055 1.969 1500

[0222] Tubular samples of each extrusion (the control HDPE tube, and Tubes A and B containing the commercially available HBPs) were analysed with XPS.sup.3 (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, using a Kratos AXIS-165, Mono Al X-rays, referencing the NIST-XPS database, version 3.5), a technique which measures the chemical composition within a surface depth of nanometers.sup.3. FIG. 6(a) compares the spectra of (X), a high density polyethylene (HDPE) control tube against (Y), Tube A containing a 5 wt. % of a fourth generation hyperbranched polyester, Boltorn H40 in a HDPE host matrix and (Z), Tube B containing a 5 wt. % of a hyperbranched polyester amide, Hybrane PS2550 in a HDPE host matrix. The absence of a peak with a binding energy between 288-290 eV in the HDPE control tube when compared to the other two tubes confirmed the presence of hyperbranched polymers at the surface of both. Further analysis of Tube B, shown in FIG. 6(b), confirmed the presence of nitrogen (N) at both the inner and outer surfaces of the extruded tube, indicating that the hyperbranched polyester amide, Hybrane PS2550, resided at both surfaces and not in the bulk of the extrusion. .sup.3 XPS spectra are, for the most part, quantified in terms of peak intensities and peak positions. The peak intensities measure how much of a material is at the surface, while the peak positions indicate the elemental and chemical composition. the best way to compare XPS intensities is via, so called, percentage atomic concentrations. The key feature of these percentage atomic concentrations is the representation of the intensities as a percentage, that is, the ratio of the intensity to the total intensity of electrons in the measurement.

[0223] This study was performed to demonstrate the ability of branched polymers to act as a vehicle in which to transport selected functional groups of the branched polymers to both the inner and outer surfaces of an extrusion.

[0224] A batch of each extruded tubing including the HDPE control and each extrusion comprising a hyperbranched polymer (Tubes A and B), were overmoulded with an ISO594 compatible luer. These overmoulded extrusions were then tested in accordance with ISO10555-1. The force at break was used to determine the Ultimate Tensile Strengths (UTS) for each material, measuring both the bond between the extrusion and the overmoulded Luer as well as the UTS of the raw extrusions, as exhibited in FIG. 8, wherein the left-hand portion of FIG. 8 shows the UTS values for the overmoulded extrusions, and the right-hand portion of FIG. 8 shows the UTS values for the raw extrusions. Analysis confirmed that there was a significant difference in UTS's obtained for the overmould bond compared to that of the raw extrusion for both the control and Extrusion B. The UTS of the bond between the luer and extrusion for the control was higher than that measured for the raw extrusion alone. In contrast, the UTS of the raw extrusion for Tube A showed no significant difference when compared to the overmoulded bond with the luer. Secondly, there was a significant difference in the UTS of both Tube A and Tube B when compared to the control tube, suggesting a slight decrease in UTS compared to the control. Thirdly, there was a significant difference in UTS for Tube A compared to Tube B, with Tube A having lower force at break compared to Tube B. Finally there was no significant difference in UTS of the overmould bond with Tube A compared with that of Tube B.

[0225] In summary, the addition of the hyperbranched polyester to HDPE matrix (Tube A) appeared to have more influence on the physical properties of the extrusion when compared to the addition of the hyperbranched polyester amide to HDPE matrix (Tube B). The overmoulded bond of Tube B and its luer behaved the same as the control, with UTS of the raw extruded tube increasing compared to that of the control. The Force at Break and UTS recorded were all well above the required ISO values (in this case for a IOF extrusion there is minimum requirement of at least 5 N force to break according to ISO10555-1). Therefore, this example indicates that the addition of HBP to the extrusion does not detrimentally effect the bulk mechanical properties of the tube or its ability to form a strong overmould bond, with results again well within the requirements of ISO standards.

Example 2 DNT750PE Compression Moulded Sheets

[0226] Hybrane DEO7508500 (FIG. 5(D)) in a low weight percent (6 wt. %) was compounded with HDPE using a Leistritz twin screw extrudera ZSE 27 MARX40 L/Da 27 mm diameter, 40 L/D twin screw compounder fed by up to 4 K-Tron gravimetric dosing unit and downstream with a 4-hole strand die, feeding a Rieter pelletising unit. The standard medium shear screw configuration was used with no melt filtration as standard and run according to data sheet parameters for the medical grade High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) polymer matrix into rods which were pelletized. The resultant pellets were analysed via Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC), the curves of which revealed a single T.sub.m for the resulting polymer (DNT750PE), suggesting miscibility between the two materials, as demonstrated in FIG. 9(b). The difference in enthalpy between the HDPE (184.8 Jg.sup.1) and DNT750PE (198.7 Jg.sup.1) is also presented, indicating an increase in the internal energy available in the system. These pellets were subsequently compression moulded between two heated platens (ca. 150 C.) under pressure (ca. 1000 psi) to produce thin sheets. The sheets were cut into the appropriate sizes according to the standard ASTM D1894 and tested.

[0227] Compressed sheets were also made from the raw polymer HDPE matrix resin, which acted as the control. At least 5 compressed samples for each material, as per the standard, were tested. The static (.sub.s) and dynamic co-efficient of friction (.sub.d) for each were recorded and average and standard deviations values calculated. The average .sub.d obtained for the HDPE control and DNT750PE are compared against Teflon in FIG. 10. The results indicate the DEO750 additive has migrated to the surface of the thermoformed article and the PEG groups have contributed to a reduced .sub.d for the compressed sheets of DNT750PE when compared to the HDPE control.

[0228] As an additive, the DEO7508500 is expected to alter its amphiphilic core-shell conformation as it migrates through a bulk polymer matrix, all the while adapting and changing its branched and compact structure. Without intending to be bound by theory, this is believed to be the mechanism at work in the DNT750PE thermoformed article presented in Example 2, whereby the Hybrane molecules migrate though the HDPE matrix by reversed core-shell mechanisms and upon reaching the surface, the dodecenyl component of the dendritic molecule intertwines in the HDPE matrix while the PEG component is exposed to the surface. It is this amphiphilic nature of the molecule, whereby the hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements work against each other, promoting (1) migration of the main molecule to the air/polymer interface with PEG exposed to the air and the dodecenyl constituent trapped in the HDPE matrix and (2) manipulation of the surface properties of the final thermoformed article.

Example 3 Compounding & Film Extruding

[0229] The materials used in Example 2, a HDPE control matrix and a hyperbranched polyester amine (Hybrane DEO7508500) compounded using the same weight percent (6 wt. %) in a HDPE matrix, were compounded using a Leistritz twin screw extrudera ZSE 27 MAXX40 L/Da 27 mm diameter, 40 L/D twin screw compounder fed by up to a K-Tron gravimetric dosing unit and downstream with a coat hanger split sheet die and a three roll mill with PTFE sheet fitted to all cylinders. The standard medium shear screw configuration was used with no melt filtration as standard whereby the screw speed (rpm) and feed rate/throughput (Kg/Hr) were varied. Whilst resultant properties varied with extrusion parameters, most specifically shear rate, acceptable parameters according to Table 2 resulted in extrusions with desired properties. The barrel temperature profile was held constant across the runs between 110-200 C. at intervals of 10 C. from zone to zone within the screw chamber. Extruded sheets with thicknesses greater than the walls of an extruded tube were subsequently made for each batch. These were then used to measure and interpret the effect of the process parameters on the coefficient of friction of the extruded article.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Parameters. Batch Feedrate Screw Speed No. Sample Kg/Hr rpm RUN 3 HDPE 1.417 200 DNT750 0.085 RUN 3 Control HDPE 1.417

[0230] Using ASTM D1894, the dynamic (.sub.d) co-efficient of friction of each of these sheets was measured and compared to those obtained for the compression moulded sheets of the same material. The .sub.d of the PTFE extruded sheets was again measured to ensure consistency. As can be seen in FIG. 10, there is a decrease in .sub.d observed for each of the HDPE materials when results for the compressed sheets are compared to the extruded sheets. As was exhibited for the compressed sheets, the presence of the DEO7508500 additive in the HDPE matrix reduced the .sub.d when compared to the raw HDPE matrix. The same batch of PTFE extruded sheet was used during each test set-up, with two batches of PTFE tested to ensure any variability between tests were eliminated. These results demonstrate that post-processing the DNT750PE material through thermoforming processes results in greater reductions in its .sub.d, producing a value below that of PTFE (e.g., Teflon).

Example 4 Extrusion of HDPE Tubes

[0231] Following the identification of optimal composition and process parameters in the production of HDPE modified sheet, work commenced on producing suitable tubing. Prior to mixing the DEO7508500 material into the HDPE virgin pellets, the latter were mechanically ground down to a flake of 1200 m in order to increase the surface area of the material. This material was then mixed with the appropriate quantities of DEO7508500 and compounded in twin screw Liestritz compounding equipment to form strands which were subsequently pelletised, as described in Example 3.

[0232] Tubes with the modified compounded HDPE pellets using a 16 mm co-rotating Dr Collin GmbH Twin Screw 28:1 LID ratio with a K-Tron dosing system. Downstream equipment included a Dr. Collin tube die, Dr. Collin vacuum calibration tank with slotted vacuum bushing, Dr. Collin haul-off and a Zumback OD measurement system run according to the parameters listed in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Process parameters used to extrude HDPE tube with a Twin Screw extruder. Feed Ext Head Arm Die Water Screw Haul Feed Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 1 2 1 2 bath Pressure Speed Feed Vac off Zone Run C. C. C. % rpm Kg/Hr KPa m/min C. Virgin 220 235 245 250 250 250 250 260 255 30 235 50 3 39 2.5 30 HDPE Mod. 220 235 245 250 250 250 250 260 255 30 215 50 3 39 2.25 30 HDPE

[0233] Virgin HDPE tubes were produced according to the parameters as presented in Table 3 with the twin screw extruder. Modified HDPE pellets were then fed into the co-rotating Dr Collin twin screw extruder according to the parameters in Table 3. Modified tubes were produced, with samples of both virgin and modified tubes.

[0234] Development of an additive, generically called Factor DNT, commenced. Numerous different linear additives were linked via different classes and types of branched polymer elements. In relation to the non-limiting example of reduced friction, the following gives examples of Factor DNT which resulted in co-efficient of friction similar to that of PTFE (e.g., Teflon).

Branched Hybrid Polymers

[0235] Exploiting polar heterogeneity, branched hybrid polymers with components having specific functionally, can be constructed in order to be compatible enough with the host polymer to prevent phase separation and incompatible enough to enable migration of the branched hybrid polymer to the surface of the final thermoformed article. Migration may be facilitated through charge disparity with the host polymer and a compact structural configuration of the nanoscopic branched polymer element composite, whilst portions of the structure are compatible enough to ensure entrapment of the composite when it reaches the final surface. Once at the surface, the peripheral ends may provide the final article with the necessary surface properties.

Example 5 Branched Hybrid DNT022PX (6 k-3G) Compression Moulded

[0236] To this end, as a non-limiting example, a branched hybrid polymer DNT022 was synthesized to include a linear hydrophilic PEG core linked to many peripheral hydrophilic PEG oligomers via branched polymer components in the form of a hyperbranched Boltorn G3 hydrophobic polyester species as shown in FIGS. 11(a) and 11(b).

[0237] Carboxylic acid functionalized methoxyl polyethylene glycol acid (O.sub.A=m-PEG750COOH) (13.3 g) was dissolved in dicholoromethane (DCM) (100 ml) with a magnet stirrer in a round bottom flask. To activate the acid, N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) was slowly added to the solution to excess, with the outlet for CO.sub.2 by-product (molar ratio OH:CDI activated COOH [1:1.5]). The reaction was proceeded for 2 hours and monitored via .sup.1H-NMR to confirm full activation. Thereafter, a polyester HBP of G3 (5 g) was added to the reaction vessel and conducted for 15 hours. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR.

[0238] The reaction was quenched with deionized water, the solution of which was diluted with 400 ml of DCM. Subsequently, the reaction was washed with 450 ml of NaHCO.sub.3 (aq. 10 wt. %) and dried with magnesium sulfate. The crude product was precipitated from DCM to ether and collected as white powder. .sup.1H-NMR, .sup.13C-NMR and SEC were utilized to confirm the purity of DNT022.

[0239] The organic compound, 1,1-Carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) (C.sub.3H.sub.3N.sub.2).sub.2CO, which, in general is used as a coupling reagent to activate carboxylated molecules prior to their reaction with nucleophiles such as alcohols and amines, was employed in the reaction between the hydroxylated periphery of the hyperbranched polymers with PEG-COOH oligomers. The obtained hyperbranched polymers may be described as being functionalised with PEG oligomers. The PEG chains were enlisted to provide a hydrophilic surface on the final thermoformed surface. The absence of mPEG750-COOH and hydroxyl peaks (RCH.sub.2OH) in the NMR spectra of the resultant material, as demonstrated in FIG. 12(a), suggests successful linkage of the linear PEG core with the methoxyl terminated PEG750 chains via the hyperbranched polyester linker. The molecular weight (M.sub.w) of the resultant DNT022 was compared to that of the precursor as demonstrated in FIG. 12(b), showing a shift to a broader and higher M.sub.w, confirming terminal pegylation of the hybrid.

[0240] Six weight percent (6 wt. %) DNT022 was compounded with PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED, moulded to produce rods of DNT022PX and subsequently pelletized. PEBAX control pellets also underwent the same compounding process. These DNT022PX and PEBAX control pellets were compression moulded between two heated compressed plates (ca. 200 C./1000 psi) to produce thin sheets made of DNT022PX and PEBAX, with the same process steps employed for each material. The surfaces of both articles were then analysed by Raman spectroscopy, which indicated that the surface of the DNT022PX article had over 20% more ether (COC) groups (a constituent of PEG) at its surface compared to that of the control following immersion in deionised water, as shown in FIG. 13 (a). Therefore, the articles were immersed in deionised water prior to measurement of dynamic coefficient of friction (.sub.d) according to ASTM D1894-11. As can be seen from FIG. 13 (b), .sub.d for the DNT022PX was lower than the PEBAX control and PTFE, tested in the same conditions. Therefore, these results indicate that the make-up of the linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer, DNT022, enabled it to migrate through the PEBAX host matrix and position itself in the surface layers of the resultant thermoformed article, delivering the hydrophilic peripheral groups to the outer most surface of the final article.

Example 6 Branched Hybrid (Various Generation Numbers & Chain Lengths) Extruded in PEBAX

[0241] Further to Example 4, as a non-limiting example, a matrix of materials, as shown in Table 4, similar to DNT022 (6kG3) were synthesized. These materials were made up of linear hydrophilic PEG cores varying in size to include 6 k, 10 k and 20 k, which were linked to many peripheral hydrophilic PEG oligomers via branched polymer components in the form of a hyperbranched polymers with either generation G3 or G5 hydrophobic polyester species.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Matrix of Branched Hybrids. Generation Core Linear Core PEBAX Code Number Chain Size Functionality Sheets 6kG3 3 6 2 6kG3PX 10kG3 3 10 2 10kG3PX 20kG3 3 20 2 20kG3PX 6kG5 5 6 2 6kG5PX 10kG5 5 10 2 10kG5PX 20kG5 5 20 2 20kG5PX

[0242] FIG. 16(a)-16(c) include the number average molecular weight (M.sub.n, the weight average molecular weight (M.sub.w) and the dispersity () for each material. Monodisperse materials have a value of 1, whilst values between 1.1-2.0 would be considered moderately polydisperse. From the graphs presented 6kG5 and Boltorn are similarly disperse, with 6kG5 (M.sub.w theoretically 67,700 g/mol) having a higher M.sub.w compared to the Bottom (theoretically 15,200 g/mol). The 10kG3 has the narrowest dispersity of these three additives but it again has a higher M.sub.w (theoretically 25,200 g/mol) than Boltorn. The information presented in FIG. 16 (a)-(c), together with FIGS. 15 (a) and (b) would suggest that migration through a host matrix to the surface would be easiest for the Boltorn additive.

[0243] Three point five weight percent (3.5 wt. %) and ten weight percent (10 wt. %) of each branched hybrid material in Table 4 was compounded and extruded with PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED, producing PEBAX sheets for each materials. PEBAX control sheets were produced using the same process steps. Samples of each sheet type article were immersed in water at 37 C. prior to measurement of .sub.s and .sub.d according to ASTM D1894-11. As can be seen from FIGS. 17 (a), (b) and (c), the results obtained for both .sub.s and .sub.d demonstrate the influence of generation number (G.sub.n) and core chain length of the additive on the coefficient of friction of the extruded sheets. The effect of an increase in terminal end groups with an increase in generation number from G3 to G5, the theoretical structure of which is demonstrated in FIG. 15(d) (XkG5 to XkG3), appears to result in a slight decrease in frictional properties of the extrudate when compared against each other and the PEBAX control in FIG. 17(a), suggesting that the higher number of terminal end groups present in the G5 additive are influencing the effect on surface properties of the extrudate.

[0244] Conversely, when the length of the linear core chain is increased in each of these G3 and G5 additives, the results of which are presented in FIG. 17(b), it would appear that the additive with lower generation hyperbranched elements (10kG3) migrate more readily to the surface of the extrudate compared to the higher generation based additive (10kG5). Comparing the Boltorn H.sub.2O P and 10kG3 results, the lower .sub.d value obtained with the L-D HB additive would suggest increasing the distance between the hyperbranched elements results in a conformational structure which aids migration through the host matrix to the extrudate surface. A reduction in .sub.d was also observed when 10kG5 and 10kG3 results are compared, with a lower .sub.d obtained with 10kG3, the additive with a lower G.sub.n, a trend opposite to that observed for the core linear chains of 6 k, in FIG. 17a. Therefore, in order to encourage migration of the additive to the surface and utilisation of terminal end groups when the additive reaches the extrudate surface, it would appear that additives suitable for various applications may strike a balance between: [0245] additional terminal oligomers obtained from an increase in generation number (G.sub.n), [0246] restrictions imposed by such an increase in G.sub.n on the migration of the additive to the surface of the host polymer matrix, [0247] increasing the separation distance between the hyperbranched elements by varying the core linear chain length, [0248] potential entrapment of additive in the host polymer matrix due to a lengthening core linear chain interacting with host polymer matrix chains.

[0249] In summary, results from FIGS. 17(a) and 17(b) coupled with a comparison of the structural conformation of each of the additives, as presented in FIGS. 15 (a), 15(b), 15(c) and 15(d) would suggest the structure of the additive has a considerable influence over migration of the additive through the host polymer matrix.

[0250] This observation is reinforced when considering the results as presented in FIG. 17(c). A slight decrease in .sub.s and .sub.d was observed with the addition of Boltorn H20P when compared to the PEBAX control. However larger drops in .sub.s and .sub.d were observed with linear dendritic hyperbranched (L-D HB) additives, the drop in which was more pronounced with increases in the length of the linear core of the L-D HB additive. The radial shaped Boltorn material would be expected to migrate to the surface of the extruded part more readily than the linear dendritic hyperbranched additives due to its compact structure and size. However comparing the results obtained with Boltorn H20P to those with 6kG3 and 10kG3, which have a comparably less compact conformational structure, lower friction properties are observed with both LD-HB additives. Additionally, an increase in the distance between the hyperbranched cores due to a longer core linear chain, 6kG3 verses 10kG3, would be expected to result in a reduction in segmental crowding around the hyperbranched. cores, enabling greater migration of terminal chains to the surface of the extrudate, with a resultant lower friction result. This ability to modify and control the migration of the additive to the surface via changes to its molecular structure provides the possibility to tune surface properties of the final extrudate. These reductions in friction properties are linked to conformational structures and decreases in segmental crowding of the hyperbranched elements of the additive.

[0251] It can be seen in FIG. 18(a) that G5 based additives the .sub.s increases with increased core linear chain length from 6 k to 10 k and appears to reach a plateau comparing 10 k to 20 k results. A similar trend is observed for .sub.d with both G3 and G5 based additives, as presented in FIG. 18(b), with a reduction in friction observed for a core chain length of 10 k when compared to the shorter 6 k and longer 20 k core chain lengths. In fact both the 10 k and 20 k G5 extrudates demonstrate .sub.s values above that for the virgin PEBAX control. For G3 based additives the .sub.s decreases compared to the virgin control with core chain lengths of 6 k and 10 k, however increase above the virgin value with a core chain length of 20 k. As discussed previously, separation of the hyperbranched elements may prevent these groups from acting on each other, thereby facilitating their superior migration through the host matrix. However the migration benefits due to such decreases in segmental crowding as a result of increases in core chain length, may be offset by entrapment of the core chain by/with chains in the host matrix when the core chain length increases above a certain length.

[0252] Elution testing performed on PEBAX and HDPE modified extruded sheets using human dermo fibroblasts, presented in FIG. 19 (a) and mouse macrophages, shown in FIG. 19 (b), demonstrate >85% cell viability after 72 hours for all the samples, clearly demonstrating extrudate of modified host matrices are non-toxic.

[0253] Whilst not being bound by theory a number of factors may influence the migration of the additives through a host polymer matrix in order to allow the additive to achieve a concentration gradient such that the additive is positioned predominantly in the surface layers of the resultant thermoformed article, delivering the peripheral groups of the additive to the outer most surface(s) of the final formed article. These factors may include, but are not limited to: [0254] energy differences between the additive and the host polymer, e.g., producing segregation via enthalpic differences; [0255] entropic differences between the additive and the host polymer via shearing imparted during the blending and thermoforming processes; [0256] molecular size/weight of the additive; [0257] structural conformation of the additive; and/or [0258] lack of entanglements in/with the hyperbranched structure of the additive as compared to the structure of the host polymer.

Example 7 HBPOH Stabilised Silver Colloidal Particles

[0259] The following prophetic example illustrates the use of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with peripheral hydroxyl groups to stabilise colloidal silver particles, which may have the ability to release microbicidal catonic silver species. In this example the following are used: polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups, silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) as the active antibacterial agent, water as a solvent, and sodium borohydride as a reducing agent. Those skilled in the art of producing elemental nano- and micro-particles of noble metals will understand that a number of common reducing agents and silver salts would be suitable to form elemental silver particles in this way, and thus this example serves only to aid understanding of the process. [0260] Step 1. Dissolve the polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups in distilled water in a round bottom flask with magnetic stirring, at a concentration of 0.3 mM. [0261] Step 2. Add silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) in a ratio of silver:HBP of 1:1 and stir the solution for 24 hours at room temperature, so as to ensure complete formation of the HBP-silver complex. [0262] Step 3. Addition of sodium borohydride (NaBH.sub.3) reducing agent generates colloidal silver particles, in a molar ratio of silver nitrate:sodium borohydride of 1:10, with vigorous stirring. [0263] Step 4. Stir the reaction mixture for a further 1-4 hours, observing the formation of colloidal silver particles by a colour change in the solution to yellow, pink, red or brown. [0264] Step 5. Dialyse the solution against water in a 2 kDa molecular weight cut off regenerated cellulose membrane to remove impurities, and isolate the resulting solution by freeze drying. [0265] Step 6. Characterize the resulting solid by .sup.1H-NMR, FTIR and UV/vis spectroscopy.

Example 8 Tube Extrusion of HBPOH Stabilized Silver Colloidal Particles in a PEBAX Host

[0266] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 7 and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0267] Step 1. Weigh out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized HBPOH stabilized silver colloidal particles additive of Example 7 and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0268] Step 2. Mix the quantities of silver LD MB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0269] Step 3. Extrude the silver LD HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0270] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 9 Synthesis of COOH-Functional HBP

[0271] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with peripheral carboxylic acid groups. In this example the following are used: polyester HBP of G3 and succinic anhydride as reactants, 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as activator, dichloromethane (DCM), pyridine, water and diethyl ether as solvents, and sodium hydrogen sulfate (NaHSO.sub.4) as a washing solution. [0272] Step 1. Dissolve 50 g of the polyester HBP G3 in 100 mL dichloromethane (DCM) with 10 mL pyridine in a round bottom flask with magnetic stirring. [0273] Step 2. Add 2.5 g 4-dimethylaminopyridine, followed by slow addition of 15.8 g succinic anhydride. Allow the reaction to proceed for 24 hours and confirm by .sup.1H- and .sup.13C-NMR. [0274] Step 3. Subsequently quench the reaction mixture with 200 mL deionised water and stir until full quenching could be observed by .sup.13C-NMR [0275] Step 4. Wash the reaction mixture with 3100 mL NaHSO.sub.4 and dry over magnesium sulfate. Isolate the COOH-functional HBP as a white powder by precipitation into diethyl ether. Further purify the solid by freeze drying. [0276] Step 5. Characterise the product using .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR.

Example 10 Silver Complex with COOHHBP

[0277] The following prophetic example illustrates the use of the HBP described in Example 9 to form complexes with silver cations. In this example the following are used: polyester HBP of G3 with carboxylic acid peripheral groups, silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) as the active antibacterial agent and water as a solvent. Those skilled in the art of coordination chemistry will understand that a number of silver salts would be suitable to form elemental silver particles in this way, and thus this example serves only to aid understanding of the process. [0278] Step 1. Dissolve 1 g of the polyester HBP G3 with COOH peripheral groups in 50 mL methanol in a round bottom flask with magnetic stirring. [0279] Step 2. After complete dissolution, add an aqueous solution of silver nitrate with vigorous stirring, so that the molar ratio of HBP:silver nitrate was 1:4. [0280] Step 3. After 2 hours stirring, remove the solvents in vacuo and further purify the material via freeze drying.

Example 11 Tube Extrusion of Silver Complex with COOHHBP in a PEBAX Host

[0281] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 10 and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0282] Step 1. Weigh out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized silver complex with the COOHHB polymer of Example 10 and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0283] Step 2. Mix the quantities of silver LD HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0284] Step 3. Extrude the silver HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0285] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 12 Synthesis of Amine Functional-HBP

[0286] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with peripheral amine groups. In this example the following are used: polyester HBP of G3 and boc (tert-butyloxycarbonyl) protected beta-alanine anhydride as reactants, 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) as activator, dichloromethane (DCM), pyridine, water and diethyl ether as solvents, and sodium hydrogen sulfate (NaHSO.sub.4) as a washing solution. [0287] Step 1. Dissolve 50 g of the polyester HBP G3 in 100 mL dichloromethane (DCM) with 10 mL pyridine in a round bottom flask with magnetic stirring. [0288] Step 2. Add 2.5 g 4-dimethylaminopyridine, followed by slow addition of 60 g boc-protected beta-alanine anhydride. Allow the reaction to proceed for 24 hours and confirm by 1H- and 13C-NMR. [0289] Step 3. Subsequently quench the reaction mixture with 200 mL deionised water and stir until full quenching is observed by .sup.13C-NMR [0290] Step 4. Wash the reaction mixture with 3100 mL NaHSO.sub.4 and dry over magnesium sulfate. Isolate the COOH-functional HBP as a white powder by precipitation into diethyl ether. Further purify the solid by freeze drying. [0291] Step 5. Characterise the product using .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR.

Example 13 HBPNH.SUB.2 .Stabilized Silver Colloidal Particles

[0292] The following prophetic example illustrates the use of the HBP described in Example 12 to stabilise colloidal silver particles, which may have the ability to release microbiocidal cationic silver species. In this example the following are used: polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral amine groups, silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) as the active antibacterial agent, water and methanol as solvents, and sodium borohydride as a reducing agent. Those skilled in the art of producing elemental nano- and micro-particles of noble metals will understand that a number of common reducing agents and silver salts would be suitable to form elemental silver particles in this way, and thus this example serves only to aid understanding. [0293] Step 1. Dissolve the polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral amine groups, as described in Example 12, in distilled water in a round bottom flask, with magnetic stirring, at a concentration of 0.4 mM. [0294] Step 2. Add silver nitrate (AgNO.sub.3) solution in water (120 mM) such that the ratio of silver:HBP is 25:1, and stir the solution for 30 minutes. [0295] Step 3. Through the addition of sodium borohydride (NaBH.sub.3) reducing agent solution in water/methanol (v/v=1/2), in a molar ratio of silver nitrate:sodium borohydride of 1:1.5, colloidal silver particles were generated with vigorous stirring. [0296] Step 4. Stir the reaction mixture for a further 2 hours, to complete the reaction. [0297] Step 5. Dialyse the solution against water in a 2 kDa molecular weight cut off regenerated cellulose membrane to remove impurities, and isolate the resulting solution by freeze drying. [0298] Step 6. Characterise the resulting solid by 1H-NMR, FTIR and UV/vis spectroscopy.

Example 14 Tube Extrusion of HBPNH.SUB.2 .Stabilized Silver Colloidal Particles in a PEBAX Host

[0299] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of the silver hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 13 HBPNH.sub.2 stabilized silver colloidal particles and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0300] Step 1. Weight out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized HBPNH.sub.2 stabilized silver colloidal particles and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0301] Step 2. Mix the quantities of silver HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0302] Step 3. Extrude the silver HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0303] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 15 Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and PFHA

[0304] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic terminal end groups. In this example the following are used: m-PEG750COOH, perfluoroheptanoic acid and polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups as reactants, dicholoromethane (DCM) as solvent and N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) as activator. [0305] Step 1. Dissolve 67.2 grams of carboxylic acid functionalized methoxyl polyethylene glycol acid (OA=m-PEG750COOH) and 28.8 grams perfluoroheptanoic acid (CF.sub.3(CF.sub.2).sub.6CO.sub.2H) in dicholoromethane (DCM) (200 ml) with a magnet stirrer in a round bottom flask [0306] Step 2. Slowly add 24 grams N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) to the solution to excess activate the acid, with the outlet for CO.sub.2 by-product (molar ratio OH:CDI activated COOH [1:1.5]). [0307] Step 3. Allow the reaction to proceed for 2 hours, monitoring via .sup.1H-NMR to confirm full activation. [0308] Step 4. On full activation, add 50 grains of polyester HBP of G3 to the reaction vessel and allow to proceed for 15 hours. Confirm completion of the reaction by .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR. [0309] Step 5. Quench the reaction with deionized water. [0310] Step 6. Dilute this solution with 200 ml of DCM. [0311] Step 7. Wash the reaction with 4150 ml of NaHCO.sub.3 (aq. 10 wt. %) and dry with magnesium sulfate. [0312] Step 8. Precipitate the crude product from DCM to diethyl ether and collect. [0313] Step 9. Confirm sample purity utilising .sup.1H-NMR, .sup.13C-NMR and SEC.

Example 16 Tube Extrusion of Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and PFHA in a PEBAX Host

[0314] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 15 Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and PFHA Example 13 HBPNH.sub.2 stabilized silver colloidal particles and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0315] Step 1. Weigh out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized amphiphilic HBP and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0316] Step 2. Mix the quantities of the amphiphilic HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0317] Step 3. Extrude the amphiphilic HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0318] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 17 Hydrophobically Modified PEG HBP with Stearic Acid

[0319] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with hydrophobic terminal end groups. In this example the following are used: stearic acid and polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups as reactants, dicholoromethane (DCM) as solvent and N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) as activator. [0320] Step 1. Dissolve 39.3 grams of stearic acid in dicholoromethane (DCM) (200 ml) with a magnet stirrer in a round bottom flask [0321] Step 2. Slowly add 24 grams N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) to the solution to excess activate the acid, with the outlet for CO.sub.2 by-product (molar ratio OH:CDI activated COOH [1:1.5]). [0322] Step 3. Allow the reaction to proceed for 2 hours, monitoring via .sup.1H-NMR to confirm full activation. [0323] Step 4. On full activation, add 50 grams of polyester HBP of G3 to the reaction vessel and allow to proceed for 15 hours. Confirm completion of the reaction by .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR. [0324] Step 5. Quench the reaction with deionized water. [0325] Step 6. Dilute this solution with 200 ml of DCM. [0326] Step 7. Wash the reaction with 41 ml of NaHCO.sub.3 (aq. 10 wt. %) and dry with magnesium sulfate. [0327] Step 8. Precipitate the crude product from DCM to diethyl ether and collect. [0328] Step 9. Confirm sample purity utilising .sup.1H-NMR, .sup.13C-NMR and SEC.

Example 18 Tube Extrusion of Hydrophobically Modified PEG HBP with Stearic Acid in a PEBAX Host

[0329] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of the hydrophobic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 17 Hydrophobically modified PEG HBP with stearic acid and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0330] Step 1. Weight out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized hydrophobic HBP and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0331] Step 2. Mix the quantities of the hydrophobic HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0332] Step 3. Extrude the hydrophobic HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0333] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 19 Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and Stearic Acid

[0334] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic terminal end groups. In this example the following are used: m-PEG750COOH, stearic acid and polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups as reactants, dicholoromethane (DCM) as solvent and N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) as activator. [0335] Step 1. Dissolve 67.2 grams of carboxylic acid functionalized methoxyl polyethylene glycol acid (OA=m-PEG750COOH) and 19.7 grams stearic acid in dicholoromethane (DCM) (200 ml) with a magnet stirrer in a round bottom flask [0336] Step 2. Slowly add 24 grams N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) to the solution to excess activate the acid, with the outlet for CO.sub.2 by-product (molar ratio OH:CDI activated COOH [1:1.5]). [0337] Step 3. Allow the reaction to proceed for 2 hours, monitoring via 1H-NMR to confirm full activation. [0338] Step 4. On full activation, add 50 grams of polyester HBP of G3 to the reaction vessel and allow to proceed for 15 hours. Confirm completion of the reaction by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR. [0339] Step 5. Quench the reaction with deionized water. [0340] Step 6. Dilute this solution with 200 ml of DCM. [0341] Step 7. Wash the reaction with 4150 ml of NaHCO.sub.3 (aq. 10 wt. %) and dry with magnesium sulfate. [0342] Step 8. Precipitate the crude product from DCM to diethyl ether and collect. [0343] Step 9. Confirm sample purity utilising 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and SEC.

Example 20 Tube Extrusion of Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and Stearic Acid in a PEBAX Host

[0344] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of the amphiphilic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 19 Amphiphilic PEG HBP with PEG750COOH and stearic acid and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0345] Step 1. Weight out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized amphiphilic HBP and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0346] Step 2. Mix the quantities of the amphiphilic HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0347] Step 3. Extrude the amphiphilic HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0348] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

Example 21 Hydrophobically Modified PEG HBP with PFHA

[0349] The following prophetic example illustrates the synthesis of a linear dendritic hyperbranched polymer with hydrophobic terminal end groups. In this example the following are used: perfluoroheptanoic acid and polyester HBP of G3 with peripheral hydroxyl groups as reactants, dicholoromethane (DCM) as solvent and N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) as activator. [0350] Step 1. Dissolve 57.6 grams of perfluoroheptanoic acid (CF.sub.3(CF.sub.2).sub.6CO.sub.2H) in dicholoromethane (DCM) (200 ml) with a magnet stirrer in a round bottom flask [0351] Step 2. Slowly add 24 grams N,N-carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) to the solution to excess activate the acid, with the outlet for CO.sub.2 by-product (molar ratio OH:CDI activated COOH [1:1.5]). [0352] Step 3. Allow the reaction to proceed for 2 hours, monitoring via 1H-NMR to confirm full activation. [0353] Step 4. On full activation, add 50 grams of polyester HBP of G3 to the reaction vessel and allow to proceed for 15 hours. Confirm completion of the reaction by .sup.1H-NMR and .sup.13C-NMR. [0354] Step 5. Quench the reaction with deionized water. [0355] Step 6. Dilute this solution with 200 ml of DCM. [0356] Step 7. Wash the reaction with 41 ml of NaHCO.sub.3 (aq. 10 wt. %) and dry with magnesium sulfate. [0357] Step 8. Precipitate the crude product from DCM to diethyl ether and collect. [0358] Step 9. Confirm sample purity utilising .sup.1H-NMR, .sup.13C-NMR and SEC.

Example 22 Tube Extrusion of Hydrophobically Modified PEG HBP with PFHA in a PEBAX Host

[0359] The following prophetic example illustrates preparation of a blend of the hydrophobic hyperbranched polymer synthesized in Example 21 Hydrophobically modified PEG HBP with PFHA and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED and preparation of antimicrobial tubing from the blend. [0360] Step 1. Weigh out appropriate quantities of both the synthesized hydrophobic HBP and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets to produce a 3.5 wt. % mixture. [0361] Step 2. Mix the quantities of the hydrophobic HB polymer and PEBAX 7233 SA01 MED pellets with a mechanical mixer. [0362] Step 3. Extrude the hydrophobic HB polymer/PEBAX 7233 blend through a twin screw extruder with an appropriate die to produce a strand and subsequently pelletize the resultant strand. [0363] Step 4. Feed the compounded blended pellets into an extruder fitted with an appropriate die according to the tube specifications required and at an appropriate temperature, avoiding degradation of both materials, producing tube with antimicrobial characteristics at its surface.

[0364] The invention is not limited to the embodiments hereinbefore described which may be varied in detail.