FLEXURE BASED PRELOAD MECHANISM

Abstract

A preloading mechanism including: a first part having a protrusion; and a second part having a recess that matches the protrusion; wherein the recess includes a gib that is flexibly movable via a flexure; wherein a dimension of the recess varies based on a flexing of the gib; when the gib is in a neutral state, the dimension of the recess is smaller than a corresponding dimension of the protrusion; when the gib is in a flexed state, the dimension of the recess is larger than the corresponding dimension of the protrusion; and when the protrusion is inserted into the recess, the gib is in an interfering state, providing a preload force for eliminating a clearance between a surface of the protrusion and a corresponding surface of the recess, wherein the flexing of gib in the interfering state is between those of the neutral state and flexed state.

Claims

1. A preloading mechanism comprising: a first part having a protrusion; and a second part having a recess that matches the protrusion; wherein the recess comprises a gib that is flexibly movable via a flexure; wherein a dimension of the recess varies based on a flexing of the gib; when the gib is in a neutral state, the dimension of the recess is smaller than a corresponding dimension of the protrusion; when the gib is in a flexed state, the dimension of the recess is larger than the corresponding dimension of the protrusion; and when the protrusion is inserted into the recess, the gib is in an interfering state, providing a preload force for eliminating a clearance between a surface of the protrusion and a corresponding surface of the recess, wherein the flexing of gib in the interfering state is between the flexing of the neutral state and the flexing of the flexed state.

2. The mechanism of claim 1, wherein the interfering state comprises a range of flexing of the gib, such that a minimum preload is maintained when a variation in the corresponding dimension of the protrusion lies within a corresponding range.

3. The mechanism of claim 1, further comprising a locking mechanism to stop the first part from moving relative to the second part.

4. The mechanism of claim 1, further comprising an actuator to move the first part relative to the second part.

5. The mechanism of claim 1, further comprising a bearing to provide a smooth relative movement between the first part and second part.

6. The mechanism of claim 1, wherein a cross-section of the protrusion is a dovetail shape.

7. The mechanism of claim 1, wherein a cross-section of the protrusion is a T shape.

8. The mechanism of claim 1, wherein the gib comprises a nub to make contact with the protrusion.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] FIG. 1 shows an adjustable spacer that fits between translating surfaces.

[0011] FIG. 2 shows that a spring preload is created by using compression springs to force the gib into contract, applying the preload.

[0012] FIG. 3 shows that preload can be lost by manufacturing error or wear.

[0013] FIG. 4A shows a translation system with adjustment screws, and FIG. 4B shows a technique of applying preload using screw torque and a specific tightening sequence.

[0014] FIG. 5A shows a flexure based preloading mechanism according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 5B is an enlarged view of the gib and flexure.

[0015] FIG. 6A shows a gib in a neutral state, and FIG. 6B shows a gib in a flexed state according to an embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0016] The description of illustrative embodiments according to principles of the present invention is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description. In the description of embodiments of the invention disclosed herein, any reference to direction or orientation is merely intended for convenience of description and is not intended in any way to limit the scope of the present invention. Relative terms such as “lower,” “upper,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “above,” “below,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivative thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description only and do not require that the apparatus be constructed or operated in a particular orientation unless explicitly indicated as such. Terms such as “attached,” “affixed,” “connected,” “coupled,” “interconnected,” and similar refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. Moreover, the features and benefits of the invention are illustrated by reference to the exemplified embodiments. Accordingly, the invention expressly should not be limited to such exemplary embodiments illustrating some possible non-limiting combination of features that may exist alone or in other combinations of features; the scope of the invention being defined by the claims appended hereto.

[0017] This disclosure describes the best mode or modes of practicing the invention as presently contemplated. This description is not intended to be understood in a limiting sense, but provides an example of the invention presented solely for illustrative purposes by reference to the accompanying drawings to advise one of ordinary skill in the art of the advantages and construction of the invention. In the various views of the drawings, like reference characters designate like or similar parts.

[0018] A linear translation stage is a precise motion system used to restrict an object to a single axis of motion. Linear translation stages include a platform that moves relative to a base. The motions between the platform and base are precisely restricted to one dimension. Typically, either one of the platform or base has a protrusion and the other one of the platform or base has a matching recess, such that the relative motion the platform can slide relative to the base as guided by the protrusion being fitted in the recess. In order to have a precise control of the position of the stage, a reload is applied between the platform and base such that one side of the protrusion is urged against the corresponding side of the recess, thus removing unwanted play between these surfaces. As already discussed above, the existing techniques for applying preload have many limitations.

[0019] The flexure based preloading mechanism according to one embodiment overcomes the limitations of previous solutions by eliminating the need for preload adjustments. In the following discussions, the dovetail design is used as a non-limiting example for illustrating various aspects of the invention. In a dovetail design, the protrusion resembles a dove's tail and the recess has a matching shape. It is understood that the principle of the present invention also applies to other designs, such as a T-slot design, etc.

[0020] In one embodiment, the protrusion in a dovetail design has a reverse trapezoidal shape, and the recess has a corresponding trapezoidal shape. FIG. 5A shows a preloading mechanism 100 with a first component 110 having a protrusion fitted with a second component 120 having a recess that matches the profile of the protrusion. In the detailed cross-sectional view shown in FIG. 5B, the gib 122 has a triangular cross-section flexibly connected to the component 120 via a flexure 124. The surface of the gib matches a corresponding face of the protrusion as shown. In order to avoid too much friction between the two surfaces, the gib has a nub to make contact with the protrusion.

[0021] The mechanism is manufactured with an intentional interference fit between two components (110 and 120) as shown in FIG. 5B. FIG. 6A shows the gib in the neutral state and FIG. 6B shows the gib in a flexed state. When inserting component 110 into component 120, component 120's gib 122 is flexed open to provide clearance for component 110. The flex is controlled to be within the elastic deformation limits, so once the components are assembled, the flexed gib is released back to a state of interfering. As shown in FIG. 6A, if allowed to be in the neutral state, the gib would have invaded into the space occupied by the component 110. As a result, the returning flexed gib of component 120 falls into the interference state (between the neutral state and flexed state), which provides a preload force onto the dovetail of component 110 and removes unwanted play from the mechanism.

[0022] As discussed in previous examples it is component variations due to traditional machining practices that actual preload forces values may vary from one assembly to the next. So, to account for component fit tolerances, the adjustments done to preload during the final steps of assembly are needed to give consistent performance. The aspect that makes the solution according to one embodiment possible is utilizing an advancement in machining technique, a Wire EDM operation, to significantly reduce tolerances of mating dovetail components. This allowed for the interference specification to be optimized to provide a preload value that is consistent through tolerance variations to provide consistent performance. In a basic summary the preload force is designed into the component's shape.

[0023] An advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that no preload adjustment is needed for each component manufactured because the flexure can provide a minimum preload force necessary to remove the play between surfaces when the components are manufactured within the fit tolerance limits.

[0024] The present invention has been described at some length and with some particularity with respect to the several described embodiments, it is not intended that it should be limited to any such particulars or embodiments or any particular embodiment, but it is to be construed with references to the appended claims so as to provide the broadest possible interpretation of such claims in view of the prior art and, therefore, to effectively encompass the intended scope of the invention. Furthermore, the foregoing describes the invention in terms of embodiments foreseen by the inventor for which an enabling description was available, notwithstanding that insubstantial modifications of the invention, not presently foreseen, may nonetheless represent equivalents thereto.