Monitoring method for a continuous casting mould including building up a database
10052684 ยท 2018-08-21
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B22D11/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D11/22
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D11/165
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D11/114
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B22D11/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D11/12
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A monitoring device (6) records variables that are characteristic of operating parameters of a continuous casting mold (1) for casting a metal strand (2). The monitoring device (6) records at least some of the characteristic variables by independently performing measurements during the casting of the metal strand (2). The monitoring device (6) forms groups (G1, G2) of operating parameters and independently tests whether the operating parameters of the respective group (G1, G2) satisfy a respective predetermined stability criterion. The monitoring device (6) accepts the operating parameters into a database (12). The monitoring device (6) determines those data records (11) contained in the database (12) that coincide in their input variables with the basic operating parameters and determines admissible operating parameter ranges for supplementary operating parameters. The monitoring device (6) independently tests whether the supplementary operating parameters lie within the admissible operating parameter ranges.
Claims
1. A method of monitoring for a continuous casting mold for casting a metal strand using monitoring equipment which performs the steps of: detecting quantities; automatically detecting metrologically at least some of the quantities during the casting of the metal strand; determining and temporarily storing operating parameters of the continuous casting mold by reference to the quantities detected; forming groups of operating parameters from the operating parameters, wherein each group of operating parameters in the groups of operating parameters includes at least one basic operating parameter and at least one respective supplementary operating parameter; automatically copying the operating parameters of each group of operating parameters into a database as a data record if the operating parameters of the group that are to be copied into the database are within a predetermined range over a relevant evaluation time period; assigning each of the at least one basic operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters as an input quantity, and a respective one of the at least one supplementary operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters as an output quantity for each of the at least one basic operating parameters; selecting at least one temporarily stored basic operating parameter; determining the data records held in the database with the input quantities that match the at least one selected temporarily stored basic operating parameter, and using the determined data records, determining permissible operating parameter ranges for the at least one supplementary operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters; and issuing to an operator of the continuous casting mold a warning message, and/or outputting a note as to which of the at least one supplementary operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters lies outside its respective permissible operating parameter range, and how the supplementary operating parameter that is outside its respective permissible operating parameter range can be brought back into its respective permissible operating parameter range, and/or immediately executing a corrective intervention by means of which a basic operating parameter of the continuous casting mold is altered, or communicating an applicable report to a control device for the continuous casting mold if the at least one supplementary operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters lie outside their permissible ranges.
2. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: cooling the continuous casting mold by a volume flow of a liquid coolant into and out of the mold, wherein when the coolant enters the continuous casting mold, the liquid coolant has an entry temperature and on emerging from the continuous casting mold has an exit temperature; metrologically detecting during the casting of the metal strand the quantities which include the volume flow, the entry temperature and the exit temperature; and also detecting the operating parameters including a heat flow determined from the volume flow, the entry temperature and the exit temperature.
3. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 2, wherein the continuous casting mold has a plurality of sidewalls, and the method further comprises: detecting the volume flow, the entry temperature and the exit temperature separately for each of the sidewalls; and determining the heat flow separately for each of the sidewalls.
4. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 2, wherein the at least one supplementary parameter in one of the groups of operating parameters is the heat flow and each operating parameter relevant for the heat flow is the at least one basic operating parameter, the operating parameters relevant to the heat flow being the volume flow, the entry temperature, and the exit temperature.
5. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: vibrating the continuous casting mold during the casting of the strand by a vibration mechanism with a vibration frequency a vibration amplitude, metrologically detecting during the casting of the metal strand the quantities which include the vibration frequency, the vibration amplitude and the displacement forces required to vibrate the continuous casting mold; and determining the operating parameters including a friction parameter from the vibration frequency, the vibration amplitude and the displacement forces for friction arising between the metal strand and the continuous casting mold.
6. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 5, wherein the at least one supplementary operating parameter of one of the groups of operating parameters is the friction, and each operating parameter relevant to the friction is the at least one basic operating parameter, the operating parameters relevant to the friction being the vibration frequency, the vibration amplitude, and the displacement forces for friction arising between the metal strand and the continuous casting mold.
7. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one basic operating parameter is one of a material of the metal strand, a format of the metal strand, a casting powder used in the casting of the metal strand, a casting speed, and a level of the surface of the cast material.
8. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: the monitoring equipment performing the further steps of: accepting, through a data input, time sequences of quantities in addition to the detected quantities; forming reference groups of operating parameters by reference to the accepted quantities, the operating parameters in each reference group including at least one reference basic operating parameter and at least one reference supplementary operating parameter; copying into the database, as reference data records, operating parameters of reference groups that are within a predefined range over a relevant evaluation time period; and assigning to each data record a respective basic operating parameter from a respective reference group, as an input quantity, and a respective supplementary operating parameter from a respective reference group as an output quantity.
9. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 8, further comprising: the monitoring equipment suppressing the copying of the data records into the database if an operator of the continuous casting mold issues a blocking command to it, or removes data records which have already been copied into the database from the database again if the operator issues a negative assessment of the data record.
10. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: determining the permissible operating parameter ranges for the at least one supplementary operating parameters of the groups of operating parameters if and only if a number of data records in the database with assigned input quantities exceed a predefined value.
11. The method of monitoring as claimed in claim 1, wherein the automatically copying is performed cyclically at regular time intervals, the time intervals being shorter than the evaluation time period.
12. A computer program which incorporates machine code, and which is directly executed by monitoring equipment used for a continuous casting mold and the execution of the program by the monitoring equipment has the effect that the monitoring equipment carries out a monitoring method with all the steps of a monitoring method as claimed in claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(7) As shown in
(8) The continuous casting mold 1 is cooled by means of a liquid coolant 4generally water. Per unit of time (for example, per second), a volume flow V of the liquid coolant 4 flows through the continuous casting mold 1. When it enters the continuous casting mold 1, the liquid coolant 4 has an entry temperature T1 and on emerging from the continuous casting mold 1 an exit temperature T2. As shown in
(9) As shown in
(10) As shown in
(11) The computer program 7 incorporates machine code 8. This machine code 8 is directly executable by the monitoring equipment 6. The execution of the machine code 8 by the monitoring equipment 6 causes the monitoring equipment 6 to execute a monitoring method, which is explained in more detail below by reference to
(12) As shown in
(13) The quantities detected are automatically detected, metrologically, by the monitoring equipment 6, at least partially during the casting of the metal strand 2. For example, the volume flows V, or Va to Vb mentioned above, the entry temperatures T1 or T1a to T1d mentioned above, and the exit temperatures T2 or T2a to T2d mentioned above, are detected metrologically. In this processregardless of the number of the sidewalls 3a to 3dthe volume flows Va to Vd, the entry temperatures T1a to T1d and the exit temperatures T2a to T2d are generally detected metrologically for each of the sidewalls 3a to 3d separately. Furthermore, the operating quantities for the vibration equipment 5, that is the vibration frequency f, the vibration amplitude h and the displacement forces F required to vibrate the continuous casting mold 1, are generally detected metrologically.
(14) Other quantities could alternatively be detected metrologically or reported to the monitoring equipment 6 in some other way. Examples of such quantities are the material of the metal strand 2, the format of the metal strand 2, such as for example its width b and thickness d, a casting powder 9 used in casting the metal strand 2, a casting speed v and a cast surface 10, or more precisely its level P.
(15) In a step S2, the monitoring equipment 6 determines, by reference to the detected quantities, operating parameters of the continuous casting mold 1. To some extent, the execution of step S2 is trivial, namely if the detected quantities directly represent operating parameters of the continuous casting mold 1. However, it is to some extent necessary, by reference to the detected quantities, to determine in a non-trivial way the operating parameters of the continuous casting mold 1. For example, the monitoring equipment 6 can, as part of step S2, determine a heat flow W from the (overall) volume flow V, the associated entry temperature T1 and the associated exit temperature T2. If the volume flows Va to Vd, the entry temperatures T1a to T1d and the exit temperatures T2a to T2d are detected separately for each of the sidewalls 3a to 3d, then of course, as part of step S2, an applicable heat flow Wa to Wd will be determined for each of the sidewalls 3a to 3d by reference to the corresponding values Va to Vd, T1a to T1d, T2a to T2d.
(16) A further important operating parameter of the continuous casting mold 1, which must be determined in a non-trivial way, is a friction parameter R, which characterizes a level of friction arising between the metal strand 2 and the continuous casting mold 1. Insofar as it is determined, the friction parameter R is determined by the monitoring equipment 6 as part of step S2, by reference to the vibration frequency f, the vibration amplitude h and the displacement forces F.
(17) In a step S3, the monitoring equipment 6 gives the operating parameters an associated timestamp and temporarily stores them away internally together with the timestamp. If necessary, the characteristic quantities underlying the operating parameters can also be stored away together with the operating parameters.
(18) In a step S4, the monitoring equipment 6 forms groups G1, G2 of operating parameters. Each of the groups G1, G2 includes several operating parameters. In particular, each of them includes at least one basic operating parameter, and at least one supplementary operating parameter. For example, the monitoring equipment 6 can, as part of step S4, form a first group G1 of operating parameters. The first group G1 of operating parameters includes, as the supplementary operating parameter, the heat flow W, Wa to Wd and as the basic operating parameter the operating parameters which are relevant for the heat flow W, Wa to Wd. These operating parametersi.e. the operating parameters which are relevant in the context of the first group G1include in particular the format b, d of the metal strand 2 and the casting speed v, thus in sum the amount of the metal strand 2 which is cast per unit of time. Furthermore, they include the start temperature, at which the liquid metal is fed to the continuous casting mold 1, the physical parameters of the material of the metal strand 2, for example its specific setting point enthalpy and the level P of the surface of the cast 10. Other quantities can also be considered, such as for example the casting powder 9 which is used. On the other hand, the items of vibration data, f, h, F are generally of lower importance in the context of the first group G1. They can, but need not necessarily, be contained in the first group G1.
(19) Alternatively or in addition to the first group G1, the monitoring equipment 6 can, as part of step S4, form a second group G2 of operating parameters. The second group G2 of operating parameters includes as the supplementary operating parameter the friction parameter R and as the basic operating parameter those operating parameters which are relevant to the friction parameter R. These operating parametersi.e. the operating parameters which are relevant in the context of the second group G2include in particular the start temperature, at which the liquid metal is fed to the continuous casting mold 1, the physical parameters of the material of the metal strand 2, the format b, d of the metal strand 2 and the casting powder 9 used and the surface 10 of the cast or its level P. Further operating parameters can also be contained in the second group G2.
(20) It is possible that the operating parameters explained above are the only operating parameters which are utilized. However, it is alternatively possible to take into account further operating parameters. Examples of this type of operating parameter are the immersion depth of an immersion tube into the continuous casting mold 1 and/or parameters which characterize a shape of the vibration of the continuous casting mold 1 which deviates from a sinusoidal wave.
(21) Other parameters are, for example, the measured values from temperature sensors which are built into the sidewalls 3a to 3d of the continuous casting mold 1. Other operating parameters are also possible. These operating parameters are generally basic operating parameters.
(22) Furthermore, further groups of operating parameters can be formed as necessary.
(23) In a step S5, the monitoring equipment 6 selects one of the groups G1, G2 which has been formed. In a step S6, the monitoring equipment 6 automatically determines the value of a logical variable OK. The logical variable OK takes the value WAHR (TRUE) if and only if the operating parameters of the selected group G1, G2 satisfy in each case a first stability criterion over a relevant evaluation time period. The evaluation time period can be the same for all the operating parameters in the selected group G1, G2. In general, however, within the selected group G1, G2 it is defined specifically for each particular operating parameter. For example, in the case of the heat flow W, Wa to Wd the range can lie within a single digit range of minutes. For this operating parameter it mostly lies between 1 min and 5 min. For other groups and/or other operating parameters, each evaluation time period can have a different value. For example, in the context of the second group G2 it can lie in the double-digit range of minutes for the friction value R operating parameter. In particular, it can lie between 20 min and 30 min. In contrast, the stability criteria for the operating parameters in the group G1, G2 candepending on the situation in the individual caseeither be all the same within the selected group G1, G2 or can vary. Examples of suitable stability criteria are, that within the relevant evaluation time period the difference between a minimum value and a maximum value of the operating parameter concerned lies beneath a prescribed absolute amount, that within the relevant evaluation time period, relating to the minimum value, to the maximum value or to the sum of the minimum value and the maximum value, the difference between a minimum value and a maximum value of the operating parameter concerned lies beneath a prescribed relative amount, or that within the relevant evaluation time period the operating parameter concerned fluctuates only within a prescribed absolute or relative amount about a statistical mean value of the operating parameter concerned.
(24) Other stability criteria are also conceivable. In particular, before the actual stability criterion is applied, the relevant operating parameter can be subject to filteringfor example the formation of a moving average value over a relatively short period of time of a few seconds.
(25) In a step S7, the monitoring equipment 6 checks the value of the logical variable OK. Depending on the result of this check, the monitoring equipment 6 carries out a step S8, or does not carry it out. If the monitoring equipment 6 carries out the step S8, it copies the operating parameters from the group selected in step S5 into a database 12, as a data record 11. The monitoring equipment 6 assigns to the corresponding data record 11 the basic operating parameters as input quantities and the supplementary operating parameters as output quantities.
(26) In a step S9, the monitoring equipment 6 checks whether it has now carried out the steps S5 to S8 for all the groups G1, G2 formed in step S4. If not, the monitoring equipment 6 goes back to step S5. However, in carrying out again the step S5 it selects another group G1, G2 of operating parameters which have not so far been dealt with. Otherwise, the monitoring equipment 6 swaps over to a step S10.
(27) In step S10, the monitoring equipment 6 selects some of the operating parameters which it determined in step S3. In particular, in step S10 the monitoring equipment 6 selects the basic operating parameters. On the other hand it specifically does not select the heat flow W, Wa to Wd and the friction parameter R.
(28) In a step S11, the monitoring equipment 6 determines those data records for which the input quantities match the basic operating parameters. In a step S12, the control device 6 determines, by reference to these data records 11, permissible operating parameter ranges for the supplementary operating parameters, that is for the operating parameters which were not selected in step S10. For example, the relevant permissible operating parameter range can be determined by reference to a mean value of the relevant output quantities in the appropriate data records 11 and a statistical standard deviation for the data records 11 evaluated in step S11.
(29) In a step S13, the monitoring equipment 6 automatically determines the value of the logical variable OK once again. In the context of step S13, the logical variable OK takes the value WAHR (TRUE) if and only if the supplementary operating parameters lie within the permissible operating parameter ranges determined in step S11.
(30) In a step S14, the monitoring equipment 6 checks the value of the logical variable OK. Depending on the result of the check, the monitoring equipment 6 carries out either a step S15 or a step S16. In step S15, no special measures are initiated. In the step S16 on the other hand, the monitoring equipment 6 initiates further measures. For example, in the step S16 the monitoring equipment 6 can trigger the output of a warning message to an operator 13 (see
(31) It is even possible that the monitoring equipment 6 itself carries out an adjustment intervention directly, by means of which (at least) one basic operating parameter of the continuous casting mold 1 is altered. For example, the monitoring equipment 6 can be identical with a control device for the continuous casting mold 1 and can adjust the casting speed v appropriately. It is also possible that the monitoring equipment 6 is indeed a different device from the control device for the continuous casting mold 1, but can in an emergency situation intervene directly in the control of the continuous casting mold 1 or can communicate to the control device for the continuous casting mold 1 an appropriate message.
(32) Furthermore, the monitoring equipment 6 can in a step S17 output to the operator 13 on a display a graph against time for the past up to the current time of, for example, (at least) one operating parameterin particular of one of the supplementary operating parameters, for example the heat flow Wand in the display include, in addition to the operating parameter which is output, its permissible range.
(33) The steps S4 to S9, on the one hand, and steps S10 to S16 on the other, are executed independently of each other. It is also possible, as an alternative to what
(34) Steps S1 to S17 are executed repeatedly by the monitoring equipment 6 with a relatively short cycle time of, for example, 0.1 s. It is possible to perform the checks in steps S6 and S7 in each cycle, and if step S8 is performed, to write the corresponding operating parameters into the database 12 as a data record 11. In this case, the repetition time for the performance of the first check, and for the copying which is based on it of a data record 11 into the database 12, is a repetition time which is identical with the cycle time. Alternatively, it is possible, after each writing of a new data record 11 into the database 12, to insert an enforced pause, within which no further data records 11 are copied into the database 12. For the purpose of realizing the enforced pause, use can be made, for example, of a timer. Alternatively, the enforced pause can be realized by skipping the steps S5 to S8, or only step S8. In this case, the repetition time with which the first check, and the copying which is based on it of a data record 11 into the database 12, corresponds to the enforced pause.
(35) The repetition time will preferably be substantially shorter than the evaluation period for the at least one supplementary operating parameter in the group G1, G2 concerned. For example, the repetition time can lie at 0.1 s, at 1 s, at 10 s or at 30 s. In the case of a corresponding evaluation time period in the upper single-digit minute range, the repetition time can also lie in the lower single-digit range. In the case of a corresponding evaluation time period in the double-digit minute range the repetition time can also lie in the lower or in the upper single-digit minute range, or anywhere in the single-digit minute range. It is generally true that the value of the repetition time should be at most 0.2 times, and better at most 0.1 times or 0.05 times the corresponding evaluation time period. However, it is in principle also possible that the repetition time is identical with the evaluation time period.
(36) The approach explained above ensures that only data records 11 are copied into the database 12 for which the casting process as such is running in a stable manner. It is however possible that, in spite of a stable casting process, the metal strand 2 does not have the desired product characteristics. In this case, it is not sensible to operate the casting process using the operating parameters defined by the data record 11 concerned. Preferably therefore a step S21 will be arranged before the step S8see
(37) Alternatively or in addition to the approach
(38) As shown in
(39) The copying of the data records 11 into the database 12 canprovided that the appropriate stability criteria are satisfiedalways take place. The determination of the permissible operating parameter ranges will preferably only take place if the data records 11 held in the database 12 satisfy a completeness criterion. This is explained in more detail below in conjunction with
(40) As shown in
(41) The first threshold value is in this case larger than the second threshold value.
(42) In step S42, the monitoring equipment 6 checks the value of the logical variable OK. Depending on the result of this check, the monitoring equipment 6 will either perform step S11 and the steps S12 to S15 which build on step S11, or will not perform it.
(43) Insofar as already explained, the monitoring equipment 6 builds up the database 12 as such by reference exclusively to the operating data for the continuous casting mold 1 which it monitors. This is obviously possible, but does have the result that at the start of the operation of the continuous casting mold 1 the database 12 either does not yet contain any data records 11, or only a few. So the monitoring equipment 6 will thus preferablysee
(44) In relation to the characteristic quantities accepted in step S51, the monitoring equipment 6 performs steps S52 to S59. In content, the steps S52 to S59 correspond with the steps S2 to S9 in
(45) The present invention has many advantages. Thus, it ensures for example that the database 12 is filled fully automatically with data records 11 which specify stable, and hence permissible, casting conditions. This also makes it possible, in the case of new materialsfor example in the case of new types of steelto specify permissible operating parameters very rapidly to the operator 13 in a reliable way. The possibility of defining data records 11 in a different wayi.e. separately from the current operation of the continuous casting mold 1speeds up the building up of the database 12. The possibility for suppressing the copying of data records 11 into the database 12, or for deleting again data records 11 which have already been copied in, improves the reliability of the database 12. Furthermore, a reliable value range within which he can work without problems is indicated to the operator 13.
(46) Although the invention has been illustrated and explained in detail by the preferred exemplary embodiment, the invention is not restricted to the examples disclosed, and other variations can be derived herefrom by the person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of protection of the invention.
LIST OF REFERENCE MARKS
(47) 1 Continuous casting mold 2 Metal strand 3a to 3d Sidewalls 4 Coolant 5 Vibration equipment 6 Monitoring equipment 7 Computer program 8 Machine code 9 Casting powder 10 Surface of cast 11 Data records 12 Database 13 Operator 14 Data input b Width B Blocking command d Thickness f Vibration frequency F Displacement forces G1, G2 Groups h Vibration amplitude OK, OK Logical variables P Level R Friction parameter S1 to S59 Steps T1, T1a to T1d Entry temperatures T2, T2a to T2d Exit temperatures v Casting speed V, Va to Vd Volume flows W, Wa to Wd Heat flows