Broadband blade antenna defining a kite-shaped outer profile
10056694 ยท 2018-08-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Joseph A. Doyle (Hazelwood, MO, US)
- James M. Bornholdt (Pacific, MO, US)
- Alexander T. Bradshaw (St. Peters, MO, US)
Cpc classification
International classification
H01Q1/50
ELECTRICITY
H01Q1/28
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A broadband blade monopole antenna is disclosed. The broadband blade monopole antenna includes a body portion that is substantially flat to define a two-dimensional plane that the body portion extends along. The body portion defines an outer perimeter having four sides. The four sides are grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides positioned directly adjacent to each other. The broadband blade monopole antenna provides at least about 100% impedance bandwidth.
Claims
1. A broadband blade monopole antenna, comprising: a body portion that is substantially flat to define a two-dimensional plane that the body portion extends along, the body portion defining an outer perimeter having four straight sides, wherein the four straight sides are grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides, wherein the two pairs of equal-length sides are positioned directly adjacent to each other, and wherein the broadband blade monopole antenna provides at least 100% fractional bandwidth for an impedance bandwidth and center frequency of the antenna.
2. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 1, wherein the body portion defines four corners and the outer perimeter of the body portion is kite-shaped.
3. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 2, wherein a corner located at a lowermost portion of the antenna is electrically connected to a feed point.
4. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 3, wherein the feed point is connected to a ground plane.
5. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 1, wherein the body portion is symmetrical about a longitudinal axis of the antenna.
6. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 1, wherein the body portion of the antenna defines a height to width ratio of 9.2 to 8.4.
7. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 6, wherein the antenna includes an electrical height of about 0.015 wavelengths at a lowest operating frequency.
8. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 6, wherein the antenna has a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of less than 3:1 at frequencies ranging from about 20 to about 500 Megahertz (MHz) and about 184.6% impedance bandwidth.
9. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 6, comprising a matching circuit that is electrically connected to one of the four sides of the antenna, wherein the matching circuit includes a 150 ohm resistor.
10. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 1, comprising a matching circuit that is electrically connected to one of the four sides of the antenna.
11. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 10, wherein the matching circuit is electrically connected to a ground plane.
12. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 10, wherein the matching circuit includes at least one passive linear element.
13. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 1, wherein the body portion of the antenna is a solid piece.
14. A broadband blade monopole antenna, comprising: a body portion that is a solid piece and has a height to width ratio of 9.2 to 8.4, the body portion being substantially flat to define a two-dimensional plane that the body portion extends along, the body portion defining a kite-shaped outer perimeter having four straight sides, wherein the four straight sides are grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides, wherein the two pairs of equal-length sides are positioned directly adjacent to each other, and wherein the broadband blade monopole antenna provides at least 100% fractional bandwidth for an impedance bandwidth and center frequency of the antenna.
15. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 14, wherein the body portion defines four corners.
16. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 15, wherein a corner located at a lowermost portion of the antenna is electrically connected to a feed point.
17. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 14, wherein the antenna includes an electrical height of about 0.015 wavelengths at a lowest operating frequency.
18. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 14, wherein the body portion is symmetrical about a longitudinal axis of the antenna.
19. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 14, wherein the antenna has a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of less than 3:1 at frequencies ranging from about 20 to about 500 Megahertz (MHz) and about 184.6% impedance bandwidth.
20. The broadband blade monopole antenna of claim 14, comprising a matching circuit that is electrically connected to one of the four sides of the antenna, wherein the matching circuit includes a 150 ohm resistor.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(3)
(4) Referring back to
(5) In the non-limiting embodiment as shown in
(6) In the embodiment as shown, the antenna 10 defines an outer perimeter 30. The outer perimeter 30 of the antenna 10 defines four sides, which are side 32a, side 32b, side 34a, and side 34b. As seen in
(7) As seen in
(8) In one non-limiting embodiment, the corner 40a, which is located at a lowermost portion 50 of the antenna 10, may be electrically connected to a feed 52. The feed 52 may be connected to a ground plane 54. The ground plane 54 may be a conductive surface such as, for example, the skin of an aircraft. It is to be appreciated that the overall kite-shaped outer perimeter 30 of the antenna 10 defines an aerodynamic profile. The aerodynamic profile of the antenna 10 may result in reduced drag when compared to other profiles that are currently used for antennas, which is especially beneficial in aircraft applications. Furthermore, the antenna 10 may be omni-directional antenna with respect to azimuth. That is, the antenna 10 may include a generally uniform gain as the antenna rotates in azimuth. The antenna 10 may cover multiple contiguous frequency bands, and is relatively electrically small in size. For example, in the embodiment as shown in
(9) Turning back to
(10) It should be appreciated that the matching circuit 56 is optional, and may or may not be included with the antenna 10. However, the matching circuit 56 may widen the bandwidth of the antenna 10. It should also be appreciated that the position of the matching circuit 56 relative to the feed 52 may also be adjusted based on the specific dimensions and requirements of the antenna 10. Specifically, the matching circuit 56 may be positioned at a distance 58 from the feed 52. It is to be appreciated that the matching circuit 56 may be moved towards the feed 52 or away from the feed 52 depending on the requirements of the antenna 10. In the exemplary embodiment as shown in
(11) The sides 32a, 32b located along the lower portion 36 of the antenna 10 define a bevel with respect to the ground plane 54. That is, the sides 32a, 32b located along the lower portion 36 of the antenna 10 are not oriented at a right angle that is perpendicular with respect to the ground plane 54. Instead, the sides 32a, 32b define a sloping edge with respect to the ground plane 54. The sides 34a, 34b located along the upper portion 38 of the antenna 10 may be slanted or angled as well.
(12)
(13) As seen in
(14) In the embodiment as shown in
(15) Referring generally to the figures, the disclosed antenna 10 is a broadband blade monopole antenna that includes a relatively simple design, and is also inexpensive to manufacture. Indeed, the antenna 10 may be manufactured using relatively low-cost manufacturing processes such as, but not limited to, metal stamping. Moreover, the antenna 10 does not typically require machining or any other labor-intensive manufacturing processes. Finally, it should be appreciated that the overall kite-shaped outer profile as seen in the figures may enhance efficiency and the overall aerodynamic shape of the antenna 10.
(16) While the forms of apparatus and methods herein described constitute preferred aspects of this disclosure, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to these precise forms of apparatus and methods, and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope of the disclosure.