CATALYTIC SYSTEM FOR THE PRODUCTION CARBON MONOXIDE FROM CARBON DIOXIDE INCLUDING IRIDIUM (IR) PHOTOSENSITIZER AND TIO2/RE(I) COMPLEX CATALYST

Abstract

Disclosed is a catalytic system for the reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide. The catalytic system includes an iridium (Ir) photosensitizer and a TiO.sub.2/Re(I) complex catalyst. No additional process is required to anchor the molecule-based dye compound on TiO.sub.2 in the synthesis of the catalytic system. This enables the synthesis of the catalytic system in a relatively easy manner for groups of photosensitizer candidates. In addition, the catalytic system can be utilized as a platform for more easily evaluating the abilities of photosensitizers. Furthermore, the catalytic system can find application in various fields due to its ability to selectively produce carbon monoxide gas with high efficiency.

Claims

1. A catalytic system comprising an iridium (Ir) photosensitizer and a TiO.sub.2/Re(I) complex catalyst.

2. The catalytic system according to claim 1, wherein the valence of the iridium is trivalent.

3. The catalytic system according to claim 1, wherein the iridium photosensitizer is selected from the group consisting of Ir-OMe.sup.+, Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+, Ir-Me.sup.+, and Ir-H.sup.+.

4. The catalytic system according to claim 1, further comprising a sacrificial reagent.

5. The catalytic system according to claim 4, wherein the sacrificial reagent is BIH.

6. The catalytic system according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic system is a binary system.

7. The catalytic system according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic system reduces carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2).

8. The catalytic system according to claim 1, wherein the catalytic system produces carbon monoxide (CO).

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] These and/or other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:

[0012] FIG. 1 shows groups of photosensitizers, photocatalysts, and sacrificial reagents that can be used in alternative embodiments of the present invention;

[0013] FIG. 2 illustrates reaction systems related to the application of Re(I) complexes to the visible-light-induced reduction of CO.sub.2 to CO, (a) homogeneous-solution photosensitization (homogeneous system) that is generally initiated by electron transfer from an electron donor to a photosensitizer in the excited state followed by electron donation from the one-electron reduced species of PS to ReC, (b) a dye sensitization system (ternary system) constructed by anchoring both PS and ReC on semiconductor particles, in which electrons are injected into the semiconductor from excited-state PS and then transported to ReC, and (c) a mixed system (binary system) of the present invention comprising free PS and ReC-anchored semiconductor particles;

[0014] FIG. 3 shows a photosensitization system of the present invention and structures of molecules used in the photosensitization system;

[0015] FIG. 4 shows structures of (a) Ir-H.sup.+ and (b) Ir-OMe.sup.+ obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms have been omitted for clarity;

[0016] FIG. 5 shows (a) absorption spectra of IrX.sup.+ in acetonitrile and (b) emission spectra of IrX.sup.+ (10 M) taken by excitation at 300 nm in acetonitrile at room temperature. Insets in (a) and (b) show an expanded view for the low-energy spectral region and phosphorescence decay profiles of IrX.sup.+ in acetonitrile at room temperature, respectively;

[0017] FIG. 6 shows absorption spectra of (a) IrH.sup.+, (b) Ir-OMe.sup.+, and (c) IrCN.sup.+ in DMF during irradiation for 24 hours;

[0018] FIG. 7 shows cyclic voltammograms of IrX.sup.+ (1 mM) in the oxidation (a) and reduction (b) sides for 0.1 M acetonitrile solution of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) at a scan rate at 50 mVs.sup.1;

[0019] FIG. 8 shows plots of TN.sub.CO versus irradiation time for 4 h (a) and 10 h irradiation (b); irradiation at 400 nm for dispersions of 10 mg TiO.sub.2/ReC (0.1 mol) in CO.sub.2-saturated DMF involving 1 mM IrX.sup.+ and 0.1 M BIH and 2.5 vol % H.sub.2O;

[0020] FIG. 9 shows plots of TN.sub.CO versus irradiation time for an Ir-OMe.sup.+-TiO.sub.2/ReC binary system (black solid squares), a Ru(bpy).sup.2+-TiO.sub.2/ReC binary system (inverted solid triangles), a Dye/TiO.sub.2/ReC ternary system (blue solid triangles), an Ir-OMe.sup.+-RePE homogeneous system (red solid circles), and a TiO.sub.2/ReC catalyst in the absence of PS (pink open circles) (a), and the TN.sub.CO values after 4 h irradiation (b). Irradiation at 400 nm for the systems in CO.sub.2-saturated DMF containing 0.1 M BIH and 2.5 vol % H.sub.2O;

[0021] FIG. 10 shows plots of CO formation versus time for PS.sup.+-RePE in CO.sub.2-saturated DMF containing 0.1 M BIH. Irradiation at 400 nm;

[0022] FIG. 11 shows essential reaction processes (Eqs 1-6) for discussing structure-reactivity relationships in the photosensitized CO.sub.2 reduction based on a binary system of the present invention;

[0023] FIG. 12 shows a Stern-Volmer plot for quenching of the phosphorescence of an Ir-OMe.sup.+ complex by BIH in DMF at a wavelength of 427 nm;

[0024] FIG. 13 shows cyclic voltammograms of 1 mM PS measured on a platinum electrode (=3 mm) in DMF containing 0.1 M TBAPF.sub.6 at a scan rate of 50 mVs.sup.1;

[0025] FIG. 14 shows relative energy levels (V vs SCE) of the flat-band potential (E.sub.fb) of TiO.sub.2, the oxidation potentials of PS.sup..Math. (E.sub.pa.sup.red) and the reduction potential of ReC represented by that of RePE (E(RePE).sub.1/2.sup.red);

[0026] FIG. 15 shows absorption spectra of IrH.sup.+ (a), Ir-Me.sup.+ (b), Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ (c), and Ir-OMe.sup.+ (d) in DMF containing 0.25 mM BIH after 0-5 h irradiation. Insets show absorbance values of produced [IrX.sup.+].sup., indicating photostability of PS.sup.; and

[0027] FIG. 16 shows changes of absorption spectra following irradiation time for Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ (a) and for Ir-OMe.sup.+ (b) in DMF containing 0.05 mM IrX.sup.+ and 0.25 M BIH, and plots of absorbance change (I/I.sub.0) vs. irradiation time (c) monitored at the wavelength shown by the vertical broken lines in (a) and (b) for Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ (blue open and close squares) and for Ir-OMe.sup.+ (red open and close circles). I.sub.0 and I denote the absorbance after 5 min irradiation and longer-time irradiation, respectively.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by the ordinary skilled in the art expert. In general, the nomenclature used herein is well-known and commonly used in the art.

[0029] In an aspect, the present invention is directed to a catalytic system including an iridium (Ir) photosensitizer and a TiO.sub.2/Re(I) complex catalyst.

[0030] In the present invention, the valence of the iridium is trivalent.

[0031] In the present invention, the iridium photosensitizer may be selected from the group consisting of Ir-OMe.sup.+, Ir-tBu.sup.+, Ir-Me.sup.+, and IrH.sup.+.

[0032] The catalytic system of the present invention further includes a sacrificial reagent. The sacrificial reagent may be BIH but is not limited thereto.

[0033] The catalytic system of the present invention is a binary system.

[0034] The catalytic system of the present invention reduces carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) to produce carbon monoxide (CO).

[0035] Groups of photosensitizers, photocatalysts, and sacrificial reagents (FIG. 1) other than the iridium (Ir) photosensitizer and the TiO.sub.2/Re(I) complex catalyst used in the binary catalytic system of the present invention may be used in alternative embodiments of the present invention.

[0036] The present invention will be explained in more detail with reference to the following examples. It will be evident to those skilled in the art that these examples are merely for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the true scope of the present invention should be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

EXAMPLE 1

General Procedure

[0037] All the synthetic procedures were performed in a dry dinitrogen atmosphere. All the solvents used were distilled over sodium-benzophenone under nitrogen prior to use. Benzo[b]thiophene-2-boronic acid and 2-bromopyridine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Glassware, syringes, magnetic stirring bars, and needles were dried in a convection oven for over 4 h. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC; Merck Co.). The spots developed onto TLC were identified under UV light at 254 or 365 nm. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 G (particle size 5-40 m; Merck Co.). The synthesized compounds were characterized by .sup.1H-NMR, .sup.13C-NMR, and HR-MS. .sup.1H- and .sup.13C-NMR spectra were recorded using a Varian Mercury 300 spectrometer operating at 300.1 and 75.4 MHz, respectively. The elemental analyses were performed using a Carlo Erba Instruments CHNSO EA 1108 analyzer by the Korean Basic Science Institute. HR-MS analysis was performed on an LC/MS/MSn (n=10) spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, LCQ Fleet Hyperbolic Ion Trap MS/MSn Spectrometer).

EXAMPLE 2

Synthesis of Ir(III) Complexes

[0038] Ir(III) complexes (Ir-OMe.sup.+, Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+, Ir-Me.sup.+, and IrH.sup.+), Re(4,4-Y.sub.2-2,2-bipyridine)(CO).sub.3Cl (ReC (YCH.sub.2PO.sub.3H.sub.2), RePE (YCH.sub.2PO(OC.sub.2H.sub.5).sub.2)), and organic sensitizer (dye=(E)-2-cyano-3-(5-(5-(p-(diphenylamino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)thiophen-2-yl)-acrylic acid) were prepared.

[0039] 2-1: Synthesis of [Ir(btp).sub.2(bpy-CN).sub.2].sup.+PF.sub.6 (IrCN.sup.+)

[0040] A mixture of Ir-dimer complex (0.088 g, 0.068 mmol) and 4,4-dicyano-2,2-bipyridine (bpy-CN: 0.029 g, 0.14 mmol) in ethylene glycol (5.9 mL) was heated at 150 C. for 45 h under nitrogen. The reaction mixture was poured into water (40 mL) and washed with diethyl ether (40 mL2). To the aqueous layer was added ammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.610 g, 3.74 mmol). The organic mixture products were extracted with dichloromethane (40 mL2) and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation under vacuum. The solids were collected by filtration, washed with water and vacuum dried. The obtained crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (solvent: methanol/dichloromethane, 1:6 v/v), followed by recrystallization from dichloromethane through n-hexane vapor diffusion to yield complex IrCN.sup.+ as dark-green crystals (0.056 g, 0.058 mmol, 85% yield).

[0041] .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) 9.54 (s, 2H), 8.13 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 8.xx8.0x (m, 4H), 7.95 (m, 4H), 7.77 (d, J=5.7 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 6.88 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.86 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H).

[0042] .sup.13C NMR (100.6 MHz, DMSO-d.sub.6) 163.17, 155.69, 151.87, 150.89, 145.64, 144.61, 142.10, 140.69, 136.47, 132.10, 128.63, 125.84, 124.49, 124.15, 123.57, 122.67, 122.21, 119.99, 115.65.

[0043] ESI-MS calcd. for C.sub.44H.sub.36F.sub.6IrN.sub.6PS.sub.2, 819.0977 [M-PF.sub.6.sup.+; found 819 [M-P F.sub.6.sup.+.

[0044] 2-2: Confirmation of Synthesized Molecular Structures

[0045] Cationic Ir.sup.III-complexes denoted as IrX.sup.+PF.sub.6.sup.(X=OMe, .sup.tBu, Me, H, and CN) were synthesized from dimeric Ir.sub.2(btp).sub.4Cl.sub.2 and 4,4-X.sub.2-2,2-bipyridines (X.sub.2-bpy) in moderate yields following a literature method. The preparation of Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+(PF.sub.6.sup.).sub.2 used as a comparative photosensitizer was performed according to the published method. The structures of IrX.sup.+PF.sub.6.sup. were confirmed by the spectroscopic and elemental analyses.

[0046] In particular, IrH.sup.+PF.sub.6.sup. and Ir-OMe.sup.+PF.sub.6.sup. gave fine crystals relevant to X-ray crystallographic analysis, revealing a monoclinic crystal system of the P2.sub.1/n space group with reliability factors of R.sub.1=0.0315 and 0.0286, respectively. The (2-pyridyl)benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl ligands are commonly bonded to the iridium(III) center with cis-C,C and trans-N,N dispositions (FIG. 4).

EXAMPLE 3

Characterization of the Ir(III) complexes

[0047] 3-1:Crystal Structure Determination

[0048] Fine crystals of IrH.sup.+ and Ir-OMe.sup.+ obtained from a dichloromethane/n-hexane solution were sealed in glass capillaries under argon, and mounted on a diffractometer. The preliminary examination and data collection were performed using a Bruker SMART CCD detector system single-crystal X-ray diffractometer equipped with a sealed-tube X-ray source (50 kV30 mA) using graphite monochromated Mo K.sub. radiation (=0.71073 ). The preliminary unit cell constants were determined using a set of 45 narrowframe (0.3 in ) scans. The double pass method of scanning was used to exclude noise. The collected frames were integrated using an orientation matrix determined from the narrow-frame scans. The SMART software package was used for data collection, and SAINT was used for frame integration. The final cell constants were determined through global refinement of the xyz centroids of the reflections harvested from the entire dataset. Structure solution and refinement were carried out using the SHELXTL-PLUS software package.

[0049] 3-2: Cyclic Voltammetry (CV)

[0050] CV was performed for an acetonitrile or DMF solution containing each of the electroactive compounds (1 mM) and 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium perchlorate at room temperature under an Ar atmosphere using a BAS 100B electrochemical analyzer equipped with a platinum working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and an Ag/AgNO.sub.3 (0.1 M) reference. All the potentials were calibrated to the ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc.sup.+) redox couple.

[0051] 3-3: Steady-State and Time-Resolved Spectroscopic Measurements

[0052] Absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu (UV-3101PC) scanning spectrophotometer. Emission and excitation spectra were measured by using a Varian fluorescence spectrophotometer (Cary Eclipse). For time-resolved spectroscopy, an Ar-purged acetonitrile solution of IrX.sup.+ was irradiated with 309 nm pulses, which were generated by modulating the third harmonic (355 nm) of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Surelite II, pulse width of 4.5 ns) with an H.sub.2-Raman shifter. The emitted phosphorescence was recorded using an ICCD detector (Andor, iStar) equipped with a monochromator (DongWoo Optron, Monora 500i). The temporal profiles were measured using a monochromator equipped with a photomultiplier (Zolix Instruments Co., CR 131) and a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix, TDS-784D). Phosphorescence lifetimes were measured according to a single photon counting method using a streak scope (Hamamatsu Photonics, C10627-03) equipped with a polychromator (Acton Research, SP2300). Ultra-short laser pulses were generated from a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Coherent, Vitesse, FWHM 100 fs) pumped with a diode-pumped solid-state laser (Coherent, Verdi). High-power (1.5 mJ) pulses were generated using a Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (Coherent, Libra, 1 kHz). The pulses at 330 nm generated from an optical parametric amplifier (Coherent, TOPAS) were used as the excitation light. The temporal emission profiles were well-fitted to a single-exponential function. The time resolution is 20 ps after the deconvolution procedure. The fitting was judged by weighted residuals and the X.sup.2 values.

[0053] 3-4: Photophysical Properties of IrX.sup.+

[0054] The UV-visible absorption and emission spectra of IrX.sup.+ were measured in acetonitrile. The absorption maxima and molar extinction coefficients are summarized in Table 1. All complexes commonly reveal intense absorptions at 250 and 350 nm assignable as the -* transitions of the X.sub.2-bpy and btp ligands, respectively, and a less intense absorption band at 430 nm attributable to a transition with a dominant contribution of Ir.sup.III-to-btp charge transfer (FIG. 2). In the case of Ir-CN.sup.+, an extra weak band appears around 560 nm, which is attributable to other transition with a contribution of the (CN).sub.2-bpy ligand as reported for another IrX.sup.+ complex (XCF.sub.3).

[0055] The emission spectra of IrX.sup.+ were measured in degassed acetonitrile at room temperature, and the data are summarized in Table 1. The Ir(III) complexes reveal similar phosphorescence spectra with the maxima at 590 and 640 nm accompanied by a shoulder at 701 nm, while IrCN.sup.+ is virtually nonemissive even at 77 K. Table 1 lists the quantum yields () and lifetimes (T) of phosphorescence for the four emissive complexes, which uniquely depend on the substituent (X) of the bpy ligand. From the observed values of and T, the rate constants of the radiative and nonradiative pathways (k.sub.r and k.sub.nr) were calculated. While the k.sub.r values are similar with minor differences, k.sub.nr increases in the order Ir-OMe.sup.+Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+Ir-Me.sup.+<<IrH.sup.+, an interesting dependence on the bulkiness and/or electron-donating character of X. Since the emissive complexes reveal almost identical phosphorescence spectra and similar k.sub.r values independently of the X.sub.2-bpy ligand, the btp ligand should be dominantly involved in the emissive excited state accompanied by a small or negligible contribution of the X.sub.2-bpy ligand. The phosphorescence of IrX.sup.+ should commonly occur from a state with a dominant or major contribution of the btp-centered triplet (.sup.3LC) mixed with a metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (.sup.3MLCT) character, as reported for similar heteroleptic and homoleptic Ir.sup.III analogues with the btp ligand. On the other hand, the k.sub.nr values significantly vary with X, suggesting that the X.sub.2-bpy ligands significantly contribute to the nonradiative decay process (or processes) from the emissive state. A possible assumption is that vibrational modes in the X.sub.2-bpy ligands would be more or less coupled with the crossing from the emissive state to other nonemissive state(s), e.g. a metal-centred triplet state (.sup.3MC). Alternatively, the electron-donating OMe, .sup.tBu, and Me substituents would more or less enhance the electron density on the Ir(III) centre in the excited state to result in an increase of the barrier for the crossing to the nonradiative state(s). In the case of Ir-CN.sup.+, the strong electron-withdrawing effect of the two CN substituents should cause a significant reduction of the electron density on the metal centre to result in a barrierless crossing to the putative .sup.3MC state. Alternatively, the lowest-excited singlet state of IrCN.sup.+ different from that of the other complexes would undergo direct intersystem crossing to a nonemissive triplet state. At any rate, if the nonemissive state would be coupled with a chemical change of IrX.sup.+, the Ir(III) complexes are not attractive as PS. Fortunately, it was confirmed that all the complexes are totally stable under long-term irradiation in DMF (FIG. 6), an observation demonstrating that IrX.sup.+ can work as potential photosensitizer for the present CO.sub.2-reduction investigation.

[0056] TABLE 1 Photophysical properties of IrX.sup.+

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Photophysical properties of IrX.sup.+ .sup.[a].sub.abs (nm) ( (10.sup.3 M.sup.1 cm.sup.1)) .sup.[b].sub.em (nm) .sup.[c] .sup.[d] (s) .sup.[e]k.sub.r (10.sup.4 s.sup.1) .sup.[f]k.sub.nr (10.sup.5 s.sup.1) IrOMe.sup.+ 268(38), 328(21), 427(6) 591, 640, 0.107 5.64 1.90 1.58 701 Ir.sup.tBu.sup.+ 272(34), 309(26), 327(19), 589, 638, 0.116 6.47 1.79 1.37 430(6) 702 IrMe.sup.+ 272(31), 308(24), 326(18), 590, 638, 0.064 4.39 1.46 2.13 427(6) 703 IrH.sup.+ 277(33), 311(25), 335(18), 590, 641 0.009 0.255 3.53 38.9 431(6) IrCN.sup.+ 284(39), 310(31), 327(26), .sup.[g] .sup.[g] .sup.[g] .sup.[g] .sup.[g] 401(8), 429(7), 560(0.3) Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ 244(25), 287(84), 451(14) 621 0.095 0.855 10.6 10.2 .sup.[a]Absorption maxima (molar extinction coefficient). .sup.[b]Phosphorescence maxima. .sup.[c]Phosphorescence quantum yield measured in deaerated acetonitrile. .sup.[d]Phosphorescence lifetime measured in deaerated acetonitrile. .sup.[e]Radiative rate constant. .sup.[f]Nonradiative rate constant. .sup.[g]No luminescence.

[0057] 3-5: Electrochemical Properties of IrX.sup.+

[0058] The electrochemical properties of IrX.sup.+ were examined by cyclic voltammetry (CV), the data of which are summarized in Table 2. Typical CV scans of IrX.sup.+ are shown in FIG. 7, revealing pseudo reversal behaviour with distinct anodic and cathodic waves in both the positive and negative sides, from which the half-wave oxidation and reduction potentials, E.sub.1/2.sup.ox and E.sub.12.sup.red, were estimated. The E.sub.1/2.sup.ox values are almost identical within 30 mV differences except for IrCN.sup.+ where the potential is more positive by 70100 mV. Since the highest-occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) can be considered to dominantly populate on the Ir(III) center, the energy levels would be not significantly changed by the OMe and alkyl substituents of X.sub.2-bpy. In the case of XCN, however, the strong electron-withdrawing effect would cause an appreciable decrease of electron density on the metal centre to result in a substantial shift of the HOMO level. With respect to the reduction potential, the E.sub.1/2.sup.red values in the cases of X=OMe, .sup.tBu, and Me are again similar within 20 mV differences, but appreciably more negative by 100 mV than that of IrH.sup.+. On the other hand, IrCN.sup.+ reveals a substantially more positive shift of E.sub.1/2.sup.red by 570680 mV. This behavior implies that the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing character of the substituent X on the bpy ligand should affect the LUMO level of IrX.sup.+ to slight, but significant, degrees more than the HOMO level. Presumably, the electron introduced into IrX.sup.+ would be more or less developed on the bpy ligand depending on the substituent X, though the LUMO would be mainly populated on the btp ligand.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Electrochemical data and related energy levels for PSs Sample .sup.[a]E.sub.1/2.sup.ox [V] .sup.[a]E.sub.1/2.sup.red [V] .sup.[b]E.sub.0-0 [eV] .sup.[e]HOMO [eV] .sup.[e]LUMO [eV] .sup.[c]E.sub.red* (V) .sup.[d]E.sub.ox* (V) IrOMe.sup.+ 1.06 1.41 2.13 5.48 3.01 0.72 1.07 Ir.sup.tBu.sup.+ 1.04 1.42 2.13 5.46 3.00 0.71 1.09 IrMe.sup.+ 1.05 1.40 2.13 5.47 3.02 0.73 1.08 IrH.sup.+ 1.07 1.31 2.13 5.49 3.11 0.82 1.06 IrCN.sup.+ 1.14 0.74 1.93 5.56 3.68 1.19 0.79 Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ 1.25 1.35 2.03 5.67 3.07 0.68 0.78 .sup.[a]E.sub.pa = anodic peak potential, E.sub.pc = cathodic peak potential, and E.sub.1/2 = (E.sub.pc + E.sub.pa)/2 vs SCE. .sup.[b]E.sub.0-0 denotes triplet energy estimated from the phosphorescence data at 77 K. .sup.[c]Excited-state reduction potential estimated using E.sub.red* = E.sub.1/2.sup.red + E.sub.0-0. .sup.[d]Excited-state oxidation potential estimated using E.sub.ox* = E.sub.1/2.sup.ox E.sub.0-0. .sup.[e]HOMO and LUMO levels were determined using the following equations: E.sub.HOMO (eV) = e(E.sub.1/2.sup.ox + 4.42), E.sub.LUMO (eV) = e(E.sub.1/2.sup.red + 4.42).

EXAMPLE 4

Preparation of TiO.SUB.2./ReC Catalyst and Photosensitized CO.SUB.2 .Reduction

[0059] 4-1: Preparation of TiO.sub.2/ReC Catalyst

[0060] Commercially available TiO.sub.2 particles with specific Brauner-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface areas of 250 m.sup.2/g were thoroughly washed with distilled water, ultrasonically treated in water, separated by centrifugation, and then dried in an oven under N.sub.2. The TiO.sub.2 particles (0.125 g) were stirred overnight in a 50 mL solution of ReC (fac-[Re(4,4-Bis(dihydroxyphosphorylmethyl)-2,2-bipyridine)(CO).sub.3Cl]) (1 mol) in MeCN/tert-butanol, and then subjected to centrifugation. The collected solids were washed with the solvent and then dried in an oven under N.sub.2. The successful anchoring of ReC on TiO.sub.2 was confirmed by the IR absorption bands characteristic of the CO ligands at 2025, 1920, and 1910 cm.sup.1.

[0061] 4-2: Photocatalyzed CO.sub.2 Reduction

[0062] Suspensions of TiO.sub.2/ReC particles (0.1 mol ReC on 10 mg TiO.sub.2) in 3 ml N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) containing 1 mM PS ( IrX.sup.+ or Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+), 0.1 M BIH, and 2.5 vol % H.sub.2O were placed in a pyrex cell (1 cm pass length; 6.0 mL total volume), bubbled with CO.sub.2 for 30 min, sealed with a septum, and then irradiated under stirring with visible light at 400 nm emitted from a LED lamp (60 W, Cree Inc.). Homogeneous-solution photoreactions were performed for 3 mL DMF solutions of IrX.sup.+ (0.5 mM), RePE (0.5 mM), and BIH (0.1 M). The amounts of CO evolved in the overhead space of the cell were determined by gas chromatography (HP6890A GC equipped with a TCD detector) using a 5 molecular sieve column. The liquid phase of the irradiated samples was subjected to HPLC analysis using a Waters 515 pump, a Waters 486 UV detector operated at 210 nm, a Rspak KC-811 Column (Shodex) and 0.05 M H.sub.3PO.sub.4 aqueous solution eluent.

[0063] 4-3: Confirmation of Photocatalytic CO.sub.2 Reduction

[0064] The hybrid catalyst (TiO.sub.2/ReC) was prepared by anchoring Re(4,4-Y.sub.2-bpy)(CO).sub.3Cl (YCH.sub.2PO.sub.3H.sub.2) on TiO.sub.2 particles. Suspensions of TiO.sub.2/ReC particles in CO.sub.2-saturated DMF containing PS ( IrX.sup.+ or Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+, 1 mM), BIH (0.1 M), and 2.5 vol % H.sub.2O were irradiated at 400 nm using a LED lamp (60 W, Cree Inc.). When using IrX.sup.+ as a photosensitizer, the photoreactions gave CO as the exclusive CO.sub.2-reduction product accompanied by negligible amounts of H.sub.2 and formic acid, while in the case of Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ two CO.sub.2-reduction products (CO and HCOOH) were produced comparably with small amount of H.sub.2 production. It was confirmed that little CO was formed in the absence of either or both of PS and BIH. FIG. 8 shows plots of TN.sub.CO (=molar ratio of CO formed/ReC used) vs irradiation time. After 4 h irradiation, TN.sub.CO reaches 180 with Ir-OMe.sup.+ and 120-140 with the others except for IrCN.sup.+; IrCN.sup.+ is inactive as PS. It should be, however, noted that Ir-OMe.sup.+ reveals the highest photosensitization efficiency at an initial stage of the reaction but shows a levelling-off tendency after 2 h irradiation, probably due to chemical changes of Ir-OMe.sup.+ occurring during the photosensitization. On the other hand, the TN.sub.CO plots for Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ and Ir-Me.sup.+ are linear up to 8 h to give 300 of TN.sub.CO (FIG. 8), demonstrating that both Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ and Ir-Me.sup.+ are slightly less efficient but much more stable as PS than Ir-OMe.sup.+.

[0065] 4-4: Comparison with the Other Photosensitization Systems

[0066] For comparison, the other photosensitization systems ((a) and (b) of FIG. 2) were applied to the photocatalytic reduction of CO.sub.2 under similar conditions, i.e. (1) a binary hybrid system using Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ as PS in place of IrX.sup.+ (abbreviated as Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+-TiO.sub.2/ReC), (2) a homogeneous system using Ir-OMe.sup.+ as PS and RePE as CO.sub.2 reduction catalyst (Ir-OMe.sup.+-RePE), and (3) the Dye/TiO.sub.2/ReC ternary hybrid system. FIG. 9 shows plots of TN.sub.CO vs irradiation time for these systems compared with that for the binary hybrid system using Ir-OMe.sup.+ as PS (Ir-OMe.sup.+-TiO.sub.2/ReC). In the case of Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+-TiO.sub.2/ReC, levelling-off behavior of TN.sub.CO starts even at an early stage to give a low TN.sub.CO (50) after 4 h irradiation, considerably lower than that for Ir-OMe.sup.+-TiO.sub.2/ReC, demonstrating that Ir-OMe.sup.+ does work as a considerably more efficient PS than Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+, a well-known transition-metal-complex photosensitizer. This is again true for the other IrX.sup.+ sensitizers (X=.sup.tBu, Me, and H). Furthermore, the Ir-OMe.sup.+-RePE homogeneous system gave still worse results that the levelling-off tendency in the CO formation occurs at an early stage of the photoreaction to give a very low TN.sub.CO (30) after 4 h irradiation (FIG. 10). The hybridization of the ReC catalyst with TiO.sub.2 enables the catalyst to persistently work, providing a potential strategy for designing efficient catalytic systems based on molecular catalysts. It is of interest to note that TN.sub.CO of the Dye/TiO.sub.2/ReC ternary system is 1.8 fold lower than that of the Ir-OMe.sup.+-TiO.sub.2/ReC binary system and slightly lower than those of the binary system using the other IrX.sup.+ sensitizers (X=.sup.tBu, Me, and H), perhaps due to light scattering effects in the ternary system.

EXAMPLE 5

Structure-Reactivity Relationships in the Photosensitized CO.SUB.2 .Reduction Based on the Binary System

[0067] Eqs 1-6 of FIG. 11 show essential reaction processes for discussing structure-reactivity relationships in the present photosensitized CO.sub.2 reduction based on the binary system. The initiation process for the photosensitized CO.sub.2 reduction in either the binary hybrid system or the homogeneous system should be electron transfer from BIH to triplet-state PS (.sup.3PS*=.sup.3IrX.sup.+* or .sup.3Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+*) to generate the one-electron reduced species of PS (PS.sup..Math.) (eq 1). This is supported by the complete phosphorescence quenching by 0.1 M BIH for each of PS. FIG. 12 shows a Stern-Volmer plot for quenching of the Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ phosphorescence by BIH as a typical example; the quenching rate constant was calculated from the slope of the plot and the phosphorescence lifetime to be 5.8510.sup.8 M.sup.1s.sup.1. A further support of eq 1 is given by the considerably negative free-energy changes (G.sub.A=(0.460.48) eV), which are calculated from the excited-state reduction potentials of .sup.3PS* (E.sub.red*=0.70.8 V vs SCE for IrX.sup.+ and 0.68 V for Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+) and the oxidation potential of BIH (E.sub.ox=0.25 V). Furthermore, irradiation of a DMF solution containing each of IrX.sup.+ and BIH for 5 min gave a new absorption spectrum with the maximum at 510-540 nm, which is essentially identical with the spectrum of [IrX.sup.].sup..Math. obtained by electroabsorption spectroscopy. An alternative initiation process would be the direct electron injection from .sup.3PS* into TiO.sub.2. However, this process is unlikely to occur, because decay profiles of the Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ phosphorescence are unchanged. In accord with this, the excited-state oxidation potential of .sup.3PS* (E.sub.ox*=-(0.78-1.09 V)) is considerably less negative than the flat-band potential (E.sub.fb=1.50 V) of a TiO.sub.2 nanoparticle film in acetonitrile in the presence of 3% water. For the homogeneous photosensitization, electron transfer from .sup.3IrX.sup.+* to RePE would be another possible process apart from eq 1. However, quenching of the Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ phosphorescence by RePE was very inefficient; a Stern-Volmer plot gave a rate constant of 10.sup.6 M.sup.1s.sup.1, which is smaller by two orders of magnitude than that for quenching by BIH.

[0068] The second important process is collisional electron injection from PS.sup..Math. into TiO.sub.2 followed by transport of the injected electron (TiO.sub.2(e.sup.) to ReC (eq 2). The electron injection should depend on the differences between the conduction-band edge of TiO.sub.2 and the oxidation potential of PS.sup..Math.. The latter is approximately given by the anodic peak (E.sub.pa.sup.red) in the reduction wave of PS listed in FIG. 13.

[0069] On the other hand, the conduction-band edge of TiO.sub.2 is known to be close to the experimentally determined flat-band potential (E.sub.fb), which is 1.50 V vs SCE for a TiO.sub.2 nanoparticle film in the presence of 3% water in DMF. If the E.sub.fb value is applicable to the present TiO.sub.2 particles dispersed in DMF, the electron injection from PS.sup..Math. into TiO.sub.2 should be endergonic by 0.120.23 eV (FIG. 14).

[0070] Under such conditions, the electron injection might only slowly proceed in equilibrium with electron reversal from TiO.sub.2(e.sup.) to PS. It should be, however, noted that each PS.sup..Math. generated by irradiation of PS in the presence of BIH can survive for several hours in the absence of TiO.sub.2, long-lived enough to undergo slow electron injection into TiO.sub.2 (FIG. 15).

[0071] In an effort to estimate the collisional electron transfer kinetics from the PS.sup..Math. to the TiO.sub.2, the samples were prepared with adding 1 mg TiO.sub.2 particles into Ar-saturated DMF solution involving 0.1 mM Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ and 10 mM BIH and 2.5 vol % H.sub.2O. The quenching behaviour of [Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+].sup..Math. absorption peak by TiO.sub.2 is monitored under the dark condition, which is maintained after 5 min. irradiation to generate the reductively quenched [Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+].sup..Math. species in the presence of BIH. The faster component (38 s) might be assigned to electron transfer from PS.sup..Math. to TiO.sub.2 in diffusion layer, while the slower component (44 min.) can be assigned to the long-lived PS.sup..Math. in the outward diffusion layer of TiO.sub.2 surfaces. With increasing the amount of TiO.sub.2 particles (ranging from 1 to 4 mg), the decay of absorption peak is substantially accelerated (10 s, the faster phase), indicating that the collisional electron transfer from PS.sup.19 to TiO.sub.2 is highly sensitive to the surface area of added TiO.sub.2 particles (eq 2). Based on these observations, the inventors reason that the electron transfer rate on diffusion layer is in a few second at real photocatalysis using 10 mg TiO.sub.2 particles.

[0072] In reality, TiO.sub.2 nanoparticles have complex chemical and morphological features on their surfaces (14c) and a variety of energetically distributed trap sites, so that electrons injected from an excited-state dye may reveal complex kinetic behavior (S. H. Lee et al., Org. Lett., 12:460-23, 2010). It was reported that very fast trapping of electrons occurs with subpicosecond time constants on bandgap excitation of TiO.sub.2 particles, whereas other investigations indicated the existence of long-lived electrons. This means that the electrons injected into a TiO.sub.2 particle should show complex kinetic behavior, as has been demonstrated by multiple-component decays of transients formed by electron injection from a photoexcited dye into TiO.sub.2 as well as by direct photoexcitation of TiO.sub.2. Therefore, a crucial question emerges about what CR process(es) would be essential in determining the net efficiencies of H.sub.2 generation.

[0073] Under such circumstances, it can be presumed that the net efficiency of electron transport to ReC would be sensitively affected by various factors such as the small differences in E.sub.pa.sup.red, steric properties of PS and distributions of the odd electron in PS.sup..Math.. Provided that the photosensitization efficiencies in the early stage of the reaction are related to the amounts of injected electrons, it is of interest to note that Ir-OMe.sup.+ is significantly more efficient as photosensitizer than Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ and Ir-Me.sup.+ even though the E.sub.pa.sup.red differences are only 40 mV. Presumably, the strong electron-donating effect of the OMe substituents would prevent significant population of the odd electron on the bpy ligand to push the electron toward the btp ligand. In the other PS.sup..Math., however, the negative charge would be more or less delocalized over the whole ligands. The particular electronic character of [Ir-OMe.sup.+].sup..Math. might be indicated by the broad spectrum different from the common sharp spectra for other (Ir-X.sup.+).sup..Math.. In photoreaction using Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+ as PS, the relatively low selectivity and activity of CO production can be explained by the catalytic production of HCOOH (a competitive by-product) by [Ru(bpy).sub.2(DMF).sub.2].sup.2+-type complexes, which would be generated via photochemical ligand substitution during photolysis. The formation of dimeric Ru complexes is evidenced by the absorption peaks reshaped with a substantial decrease of original absorption peak of [Ru(bpy).sub.3.sup.2+].sup..Math. under continuous light irradiation. From these data, it can be concluded that free Ir complexes are more suitable as a photosensitizer in photocatalytic CO.sub.2 reduction system than Ru complex.

[0074] The reduction of CO.sub.2 to CO requires net two-electron transfer to ReC from TiO.sub.2(e.sup.), which should sequentially proceed. The simultaneous transfer of two electrons as an alternative process is unlikely to occur, because E.sub.fb of TiO.sub.2 is considerably less negative than the two-electron reduction potential of ReC. The one-electron reduced species of ReC (ReC.sup..Math.=L(CO).sub.3ReCl.sup..Math.) generated by the initial one-electron transfer from TiO.sub.2(e.sup.) to ReC gives the 17-electron species (L(CO).sub.3Re.sup..Math.) as a key intermediate after the liberation of Cl.sup. (eq 3) followed by coordination of a solvent molecule (eq 4). This species is known to interact with CO.sub.2, probably by the coordination of CO.sub.2 to the metal center (eq 5). Although the follow-up processes are not fully explored, the second electron transfer should occur with electrons deposited in TiO.sub.2 after the coordination of CO.sub.2 to complete the CO.sub.2 reduction under participation of protons (eq 6).

[0075] These chemical processes (eq 3 -6) can be considered to be slower than the electron-transfer processes (eq 1 and 2), a situation that leads to a mismatch between the electron flow and the chemical processes. As the consequence, PS.sup..Math. might be increasingly accumulated in solution with elapsing of irradiation time after TiO.sub.2 has been filled up with electrons. In cases where PS.sup..Math. undergo chemical changes during the CO.sub.2reduction, the efficiency of photosensitized CO formation would start to drop after PS has been significantly consumed. This might lead to the levelling-off behaviour of photosensitized CO formation observed in a later stage of the reaction. The lower the chemical stability of PS.sup..Math., the sooner the levelling-off behaviour would appear. Changes of absorption spectra following irradiation time for Ar-purged DMF solution containing IrX.sup.+ (X=OMe or .sup.tBu) and BIH in the absence of TiO.sub.2 are shown in FIG. 16. While the absorption peaks at 520 nm attributable to [IrX.sup.].sup..Math. were commonly grown up after 5 min irradiation, further irradiation resulted in substantial decreases of the [Ir-OMe.sup.+].sup..Math. absorption in contrast to minor changes in the case of [Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+].sup..Math.. Net chemical changes of Ir-OMe.sup.+ significantly occurred during the photosensitized CO.sub.2 reduction whereas Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ was relatively stable. These observations indicate that the different long-term photosensitization capabilities of Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.+ and Ir-OMe.sup.+ are mainly attributable to the photochemical changes of [IrX.sup.+].sup..Math.. Probably, the very bulky and chemically stable .sup.tBu substituents would block [Ir-.sup.tBu.sup.].sup..Math. from possible unwanted chemical changes during the photosensitization cycle. In the case of Ir-OMe.sup.+, on the other hand, the strong electron-donating effect of the OMe substituent would be divergent; the localization of the odd electron of PS.sup..Math. on the btp ligand would help the electron injection into TiO.sub.2 but enhance the photochemical reactivity of PS.sup..Math..

[0076] While details of the present invention have been described above, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that such detailed descriptions are merely preferred embodiments and do not limit the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the true scope of the present invention should be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.