BIRD SAFE GLAZING
20180222793 ยท 2018-08-09
Assignee
Inventors
- John Andrew Ridealgh (Cuddington, GB)
- VIKASH RANJAN (Perrysburg, OH, US)
- LIAM SONIE PALMER (SOUTHPORT, GB)
- David Alan Strickler (Toledo, OH)
- Simon John Slade (Ormskirk, GB)
Cpc classification
Y02B80/22
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C03C17/3681
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
E06B3/66
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
B32B3/263
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C03C17/3636
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A01M29/08
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C03C17/3482
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C03C2217/734
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Bird collisions with windows or other glazings are minimized or prevented with a glazing comprising as least one substrate with a UV reflectance coating deposited over the substrate in a patterned arrangement comprised of a plurality of stripes, and each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width. Such an arrangement of stripes having soft edges are less apparent, and thus more aesthetically pleasing, when compared with a similar arrangement of stripes formed with hard edges, while providing an effective deterrent to bird collisions. The glazing may also be utilized as part of a laminated glazing or insulated glazing unit. A method of manufacturing the glazing is also provided.
Claims
1.-30. (canceled)
31. A glazing for minimizing or preventing bird collisions with windows or other glazings, the glazing comprising as least one substrate with a UV reflectance coating deposited over the substrate in a patterned arrangement comprised of a plurality of stripes, wherein each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
32. The glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the stripes are equidistantly spaced apart from one another.
33. The glazing as defined in claim 31, further comprising an antireflection coating between the UV reflectance coating and the substrate.
34. The glazing as defined in claim 33, wherein a plurality of substantially 2.5 cm wide UV reflecting stripes of said reflectance coating are provided, each said stripe being separated by a substantially 7.5 cm antireflection coating stripe.
35. The glazing as defined in claim 33, wherein the antireflection coating is provided adjacent the substrate.
36. The glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the UV reflectance coating is deposited on an exterior facing surface of the substrate.
37. The glazing as defined in claim 33, wherein the UV reflectance coating is deposited directly on the antireflection coating.
38. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the UV reflectance coating comprises titanium dioxide having a geometric thickness of between substantially 10-50 nm thick.
39. A glazing as defined in claim 33, wherein the antireflection coating comprises SnO.sub.x and/or SiO.sub.2.
40. A glazing as defined in claim 33, wherein the antireflection coating comprises a plurality of layers, said layers comprising: a first layer comprising tin oxide, a second layer comprising silicon oxide, a third layer comprising fluorine doped tin oxide, and a fourth layer comprising a silicon oxide.
41. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 6 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
42. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 3 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
43. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 1.5 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
44. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the UV intensity, as measured by the BUVAMI method, of the UV reflectance coating at a thickest part of each stripe is in the range of 1 to 15.
45. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the contrast ratio for each stripe is greater than 2, preferably between 2 and 7, and more preferably between 4 and 7.
46. A glazing as defined in claim 31, wherein the UV reflectance coating also reflects and absorbs visible radiation.
47. A laminated glazing comprising a glazing as defined in claim 31 bonded to a sheet of transparent glazing material by a ply of plastics interlayer, preferably wherein the UV reflectance coating is disposed on surface #1 of the laminated glazing.
48. An insulated glazing unit for minimizing or preventing bird collisions with windows or other glazings, comprising a first sheet of glazing material, a second sheet of glazing material held in a spaced apart relationship to the first sheet of glazing material, an antireflection coating, and at least one UV reflectance coating, wherein the UV reflectance coating is provided in a patterned arrangement comprising a plurality of stripes having a thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width, and the antireflection coating is between the UV reflectance coating and either the first and/or second sheet of glazing material.
49. An insulated glazing unit as defined in claim 48, wherein each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 6 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
50. A method of manufacturing a glazing for minimizing or preventing bird collisions with windows or other glazings, the method comprising: providing at least one substrate having a surface; providing a mask that is spaced apart from the surface of the substrate, the mask comprising a patterned arrangement of apertures, the patterned arrangement comprising a plurality of stripes; and directing a coating material through the apertures in the mask to the surface of the substrate to deposit a UV reflectance coating in a patterned arrangement on the surface of the substrate, the patterned arrangement comprising a plurality of stripes, wherein each of the plurality of stripes is deposited so as to have a thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0051] Certain specific embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0070]
[0071] In each of the embodiments of the invention, each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width, preferably by 6 nm or less over every 1 mm, more preferably by 3 nm or less over every 1 mm, and even more preferably, each of the plurality of stripes has a thickness that changes by 1.5 nm or less over every 1 mm in width.
[0072] As a preferred example, the antireflection coating 12 may be deposited on to the substrate 4 using a known chemical vapor deposition process in the float bath region of a float furnace. The coating 12 includes of a plurality of layers as shown in
[0073] Further, in the specific example, the UV reflectance coating 14 comprises titanium oxide having a geometric thickness of approximately 31 nm. As shown in
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
EXAMPLES
[0084] The following examples, which constitute the best mode presently contemplated by the inventors for practicing the present invention, are presented solely for the purpose of further illustrating and disclosing the present invention, and are not to be construed as a limitation on the invention.
[0085] 1. Magnetron Sputtering
[0086] In all but one of these examples, bird-safe striped TiO.sub.2 coatings were produced on Pilkington OptiView substrates by masking the TiO.sub.2 deposition. The substrates were thus 4 mm clear glass having a coating stack of, nominally, 12 nm SnOx/25 nm SiO.sub.2/110 nm SnOx/90 nm SiO2, each layer deposited by CVD. In the remaining example, the substrate was uncoated, 4 mm clear glass.
[0087] Modelling work showed that the optimum bird-visible-UV response is obtained by depositing 35 nm of TiO.sub.2 on top of an Optiview coating. The reflective TiO.sub.2 not only provides enhanced UV reflectance, but also eliminates the anti-reflective effect of the Pilkington OptiView at the stripe location. This gives a dual enhancement of the UV pattern.
[0088] It is noted that UV intensity (or BUVAMI) is a measure of Bird-visible UV energy calculated by convoluting a Gaussian curve, representing Bird UV-cone vision, with the air-mass 1 (AM1) solar energy curve. The Gaussian curve is centred on 370 nm with approx.25 nm width at FWHM. The BUVAMI curve is integrated against the measured/predicted spectrum for the coating to give an integrated BUVAMI curve. The BUVAMI curve can be used as the data source for integration against the model spectral curves within the CODE optical modelling software. It can be used to generate integrated Bird UV figures for different construction embodiments, and to optimise those constructions for performance and colour. As used herein, contrast ratio=(UV intensity at the thickest point/UV intensity at the thinnest point).
[0089] A UV reflectance coating of TiO.sub.2 was deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering through a mask 800 that was positioned between the substrate 802 and sputtering target 804, as illustrated schematically in
[0090] The mask 800 was provided with a plurality of elongate slots 806 spaced uniformly with respect to one another. For certain examples, the slots 806 each had a width of 25 mm space, with 75 mm between each slot 806, while in others the slots 806 each had a width of 10 mm space, with 90 mm between each slot 806. The former may be referred to herein as wide stripes while the latter may be referred to as narrow stripes.
[0091] The mask 800 had a width greater than the size of the sputtering target 804 in order to provide effective masking. The mask was bolted to the coating plant body using threaded studding that allowed the mask separation from the substrate and target to be adjusted. As the glass substrate 802 was transported beneath the mask 802 in the direction of the lengths of the slots 806, a sputtered coating 808 in a patterned arrangement of stripes was deposited.
[0092] The titanium oxide coatings produced could have been made under many conditions of pressure, and Ar:O.sub.2 ratios, and could be made from metal Ti targets sputtered reactively in Ar/O.sub.2 or conductive oxide targets sputtered in pure Ar or Ar/O.sub.2 mixes. For this example, the titanium oxide coating was deposited from a pure Ti metal target sputtered in an Ar/O.sub.2 atmosphere under plasma-emission monitor control. The coating was deposited using a Von Ardenne GC120 sputter coating plant equipped with dual planar magnetron cathode. The process conditions were as follows: 25 kW 100 kHz MF, Speed 441 mm/min (4 passes), Ar 250 sccm, 30% PEM setpoint for Ti emission, controlling O2 flow (giving approx. 60 sccm).
a) Example 1
[0093] Although the target thickness of the coated stripes was 35 nm, the actual deposited thickness for example 1 was calculated by optical modelling of a single layer on a clear float glass substrate coated at the same time as the Optiview coating to be 40 nm thick at the thickness point. The coating thickness was variable with position due to the soft-edge nature of the masking and deposition process.
[0094] To determine the nature of this thickness variation, another coating run was carried out during setup so that a trench was left across the coating to allow physical measurement of thickness. The trench was made by applying a fine ink line to the glass before coating. After coating, the ink was removed with solvents taking the coating with it. This allowed the thickness of the coating to be measured at regular intervals using a Dektak XT stylus profilometer. The coating thickness was normalised to 35 nm to show the expected coating thickness variation at design thickness and the resulting BUVAMI intensity (See
[0095] Tables 1 and 2 below illustrate the changes in thickness and correspond to the graphs in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Thickness Horizontal change per mm position (mm) Thickness (nm) width (nm) 10 35.0 20 34.8 0.02 30 28.9 0.59 40 17.7 1.12 50 9.0 0.87 60 6.5 0.25 70 4.1 0.24 80 8.3 0.42 90 10.8 0.25 100 20.7 0.99 110 32.8 1.21 120 34.4 0.16 130 28.3 0.61
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Thickness Horizontal change per mm position (mm) Thickness (nm) width (nm) 10 40.0 20 39.8 0.02 30 33.0 0.68 40 20.2 1.28 50 10.3 0.99 60 7.4 0.29 70 4.7 0.27 80 9.6 0.49 90 12.3 0.27 100 23.6 1.13 110 37.4 1.38 120 39.4 0.20 130 32.3 0.71
[0096] From Table 1, it can be seen that for the stripes with thickness at 35 nm, the maximum change in thickness was 1.21 nm per 1 mm change in horizontal position or width, while from Table 2 it can be seen that for the stripes with thickness at 40 nm, the maximum change in thickness was 1.38 nm per 1 mm change in horizontal position or width. When this example was viewed from a distance, the patterned arrangement of stripes was still visible to humans, but close up the diffuse edges were far less apparent (and thus more aesthetically pleasing) when compared with a similar arrangement of stripes having hard edges. This was particularly the case in transmittance from inside the building.
[0097] It was seen that, for this mask-substrate separation, the coating maintains continuity between stripe maxima, but that the thickness was very clearly modulated. It was also observed that this causes an associated modulation in BUVAMI, and that being 5 nm off design thickness causes very little variation. The fact that the film stayed continuous means that the optimum contrast ratio was not reached, as the minimum BUVAMI values are 3.8 and 4.1 for 35 and 40 nm, respectively. However, the BUVAMI for the Pilkington OptiView coating with no TiO.sub.2 on top (ideal situation) is 2.2. This means that the BUVAMI contrast ratio was reduced from the optimum 6.3 to 3.7 (for 35 nm) or 3.2 (for 40 nm). This was still a very significant contrast ratio, and it is expected this can be improved upon by moving the mask closer to the substrate or narrowing the mask slots, thereby reducing the minimum thickness of the TiO.sub.2 deposited
[0098] The effect of continuous coating and being 5 nm from the target on UV Intensity (BUVAMI) and contrast ratio is shown in Table 3 below.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Soft-edge pattern Sharp-edge pattern 4.1/4.7 nm min TiO.sub.2 0 nm min TiO.sub.2 (for 35/40 nm max) UV Intensity Contrast UV Intensity TiO.sub.2 max nm (BUVAM1) Ratio (BUVAM1) Contrast Ratio 0 2.2 1 N/A N/A 35 13.9 6.3 3.8 3.7 40 13.1 6.0 4.1 3.2
[0099] The tunnel testing was conducted in accordance with a test method that is a modification of the method of ONR 19140:2010 Austrian Standards Institute publication Bird-safe glass: testing of efficiency [2010], the modified test being described in the publication Vogelanprall an Glasflachen, PrUfbericht Ornilux Mikado dated February 2012, in section 2.3.3 Fenster Versuch on page 11. This publication was downloaded from http://www.vogelglas.info/public/vogelanprall-ornilux-mikado_2012. pdf. The modification takes account of reflections, by mounting the test sample and the reference sample each at 35 degrees to the flight axis, and providing a sealed chamber behind the samples such that indirect reflected light intensity is less than 25 W/m2. In accordance with this test, a reference glazing of clear, uncoated glass resulted in bird strikes at a rate of 27.7%. The bird safe glazings in accordance with the invention provide a reduction in the rate of bird strikes to less than 27%, preferably less than 20%, and most preferably less than 10%.
[0100] The tunnel testing showed that the coated substrates of this example, oriented such that the stripes extend vertically, were an effective bird deterrent, resulting in bird strikes at only 6.0%.
[0101] Thus, it was shown that by this example that using a shadow mask placed between the coating source and substrate that is positioned in such a way as to be separated from the substrate enough to allow the deposed coating to extend beneath the edges of the mask in a graduated way, the edges of the stripes are soft or diffuse rather than sharply defined. When viewed from a distance, the patterned arrangement of stripes is still visible to humans, but close up the diffuse edges mean that the pattern is far less apparent. This is particularly the case in transmittance from inside a building. At the same time, the patterned arrangement of stripes provided an effective deterrent to bird strikes.
b) Examples 2-6 and C7
[0102] These examples were prepared by the same method described above in respect of example 1, with the following exceptions. Examples 2-4 were all provided with vertically oriented, narrow stripes. That is, the slots 806 in the mask each had a width of 10 mm space, with 90 mm between each slot 806. Example 5 was provided with horizontally oriented, narrow stripes. Example 6 was provided vertically oriented, narrow stripes on an uncoated, clear glass substrate. Comparative example C7 was provided with vertically oriented, narrow stripes and a smaller contrast ratio.
[0103] Narrow stripe examples having nominal titania thickness maximum 35 nm and minimum 0 nm have a similar thickness profile to that shown in
[0104] For each of these examples, the soft edges were far less visually apparent (and thus more aesthetically pleasing) to humans when compared with a similar arrangement of stripes having hard edges.
[0105] The properties and tunnel test results for examples 2-6 and C7 are shown in Table 4 below.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 UV Intensity UV Intensity Tunnel (BUVAM1) - (BUVAM1) - Test Example Thickest point Thinnest point Contrast ratio Result (%) 2 14.8 2.4 6.2 6.6 3 14.7 2.7 5.4 5.7 4 13.2 5.2 2.5 17.9 5 14.4 2.7 5.4 13.0 6 12.2 2.7 4.5 8.0 C7 14.9 11.6 1.3 33.0
[0106] While example 5 was effective at deterring bird strikes, from a comparison with example 3 it can be seen that horizontally oriented stripes are not as effective as vertically oriented stripes of the same width and contrast ratio. Example 4 illustrates the decrease in effectiveness with a lower contrast ratio relative to otherwise similar patterns, while comparative example C7 illustrates that, for a given pattern, a contrast ratio that is sufficiently low will result in no effect on the rate of bird strikes.
[0107] 2. Chemical Vapor Deposition
[0108] In this example, the substrate was glass having a thickness of 3.2 mm and provided with a silica layer having a thickness of 25 nm. Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and TiCl.sub.4 were used as the precursor materials, the reaction of which resulted in the TiO.sub.2 coating on the substrate.
[0109] A schematic, bottom view of the atmospheric chemical vapor deposition coater 900 employed to deposit the TiO.sub.2 coating is illustrated in
[0110] The precursor nozzle 904 of the coater 900 was 10 wide and was blocked at two fixed locations by a pair of 3 blocks 910, each positioned 1.5 from the nearest edge of the precursor nozzle 904. Thus, three precursor slots were defined in the precursor nozzle 904: a 1 wide slot between the two blocks 910 and a 1.5 wide slot at each end of the precursor nozzle 904. To avoid the diffusion of precursor materials near the bottom of the blocks 910, a waffle pack having a honeycomb configuration was positioned in each of the 3 slots defined in the coater nozzle 904. The bottom face 902 of the coater 900 was positioned 6 mm above the top surface of the glass substrate.
[0111] To obtain the desired thickness (15 nm to 50 nm) as well as the desired uniformity, the total flow of chemicals, as well as the ratio of EtOAc to TiCl.sub.4, was varied. Table 5 summarizes the deposition conditions:
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 UV Total Thickness Intensity Flow of (nm) at (BUVAM1) Chemicals thickest at thickest Sample (SLM) TiCl.sub.4 % EtOAC/TiCl.sub.4 point point 1 16 1 2.5 19 13.9 2 24 1 2.5 27 15.3 3 32 1.25 2.5 50 12.9
[0112] These examples illustrated that a TiO.sub.2 coating having the desired patterned arrangement of stripes could be formed on a glass substrate by a chemical vapor deposition process. A visual inspection of these examples revealed that the resulting stripes all included soft edges as described herein, i.e. thickness that changes by 10 nm or less over every 1 mm in width, providing stripes that were far less apparent (and thus more aesthetically pleasing) when compared with a similar arrangement of stripes formed with hard edges.
[0113] All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive.
[0114] Each feature disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings) may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose, unless expressly stated otherwise. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.
[0115] The invention is not restricted to the details of the foregoing embodiment(s). The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.