SENSING OF OBJECTS

Abstract

A pest monitoring system may include a sensor and a sensor unit. The sensor may be configured to measure a change in fringe capacitance. The sensor unit may include a housing, at least one microprocessor, a non-volatile memory, a transceiver, a clock, and a connector operatively connected to the sensor. The housing may include a power source. The sensor unit may be programmed to manage power usage.

Claims

1.-45. (canceled)

46. A pest monitoring system, comprising: a sensor configured to measure a change in fringe capacitance; and a sensor unit including: a housing including a power source; at least one microprocessor; a non-volatile memory; a transceiver; a clock; and a connector operatively connected to the sensor; wherein the sensor unit is programmed to manage power usage.

47. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein: the sensor includes a plurality of conductors including: an electrically conductive sensor conductor; and two electrically conductive un-grounded conductors disposed on opposing sides of the sensor conductor to form a triplet; the plurality of conductors are supported on an un-grounded conductive substrate, which is electrically isolated from the plurality of conductors; and each conductor of the plurality of conductors has a width and a thickness, and is disposed spaced apart from other conductors of the plurality of conductors by a distance such that the sensor is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a given animal.

48. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 47, wherein: the sensor conductor includes copper; and the two un-grounded conductors include at least one of copper and aluminium.

49. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 47, wherein the un-grounded conductive substrate is electrically isolated via at least one of a plastics layer and a coating.

50. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 47, wherein: the sensor is structured as an elongated strip; and the plurality of conductors extend along the elongated strip and are disposed substantially parallel to one another.

51. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 47, wherein: the sensor conductor and one of the two un-grounded conductors define a conductor pair; at least one conductor of the conductor pair is electrically chargeable; each conductor of the conductor pair has an edge about which a fringe field is generatable, the fringe field extending both between and above the conductors of the conductor pair; the fringe field is tuned to at least one of detect and identify a targeted animal when the targeted animal interferes with the fringe field; and the fringe field is determined by a selection of: a material, the width, and the thickness of each conductor of the conductor pair; a distance between the conductors of the conductor pair; and a charge exerted upon the conductor pair.

52. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, further comprising a camera.

53. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the sensor unit further includes an inductive coil for battery charging.

54. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the at least one microprocessor is programmed to continuously recalibrate a baseline capacitance.

55. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, further comprising at least one of trap and a bait station, wherein the sensor unit is disposed at least one of in and under the at least one of the trap and the bait station.

56. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the pest monitoring system is disposed in at least one of a mesh topology and a wireless network.

57. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 56, wherein the pest monitoring system is configured to communicate via radiofrequency.

58. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 56, wherein the pest monitoring system is self-healing.

59. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 56, wherein the pest monitoring system is configured to feed data to a central node.

60. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 56, wherein the pest monitoring system is interrogatable via a mobile device.

61. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the sensor is structured as an elongated strip.

62. The pest monitoring system as claimed in claim 46, wherein the sensor is flat, flexible, and encased in a plastic.

63. The system as claimed in claim 46, further comprising a plurality of sensor units including the sensor unit, wherein: the plurality of sensor units are disposed in a mesh topology; and the mesh topology is configured to self-heal when a link connecting two of the plurality of sensor units to one another becomes lost.

64. The system as claimed in claim 63, wherein each of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a central node and is configured to feed data to the central node.

65. The system as claimed in claim 63, wherein: a first sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units is operatively connected to a second sensor unit of the plurality of sensor units; and the first sensor unit is operatively connected to the central node indirectly via the second sensor unit.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0081] Embodiments of the invention are further described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0082] FIGS. 1a and 1b are respectively a top view and side view of a preferred sensor according to a first aspect of the invention;

[0083] FIGS. 2a and 2b illustrate the relationship between the conductor triplet (FIG. 2a) and capacitance (FIG. 2b) as an object moves over the sensor in the direction of the Y axis;

[0084] FIGS. 3a (perspective view) and 3b (end elevation) illustrate a preferred sensor (array) comprising three sensor triplets spaced from one another;

[0085] FIG. 4 illustrates how, for example, a rat might trigger the three sensor triplets as it moves across the sensors;

[0086] FIGS. 5a to 5c illustrate the significance of the un-grounded conductors and the un-grounded conductive substrate which is electrically isolated from said conductors on capacitance;

[0087] FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative arrangement of conductors which is suited to detecting crawling insects as the travel along the length of the sensor;

[0088] FIG. 7 illustrates a sensor unit according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0089] FIG. 8 illustrates the key components of a system according to one aspect of the present invention;

[0090] FIG. 9 illustrates a networked system according to one aspect of the invention;

[0091] FIG. 10 illustrates a sensor unit according to one aspect of the invention configured inside and outside of some ducting;

[0092] FIG. 11 illustrates a sensor unit deployed about a pallet; and

[0093] FIG. 12 illustrates the deployment of the system in a building.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0094] Referring to FIGS. 1a and 1b there is illustrated a sensor (10) according to a preferred embodiment of a first aspect of the present invention. The sensor (10) can detect changes (Δ) in fringe capacitance (A) and comprises a sensor conductor (12) flanked on either side (16a; 16b), in a spaced relationship, (da; db) by two un-grounded conductors (14a; 14b). The three conductors form a triplet (14a-12-14b) and are supported on an un-grounded conductive substrate (18) which is electrically isolated (20) from said conductors (12, 14a, 14b) and its surroundings. The sensor conductor and un-grounded conductors are both of a conductive material, typically copper, and may be in the form of wires or pads which are seated, though electrically isolated, on a conductive substrate (18), typically aluminium, which shields the sensor from the surface on which it is placed.

[0095] As can be seen from FIGS. 2a and 2b the sensor which detects changes (Δ) in capacitance acts as a fringe capacitor detecting changes in capacitance as an object approaches (22) or moves away from (24) the sensor conductor (12) as it traverses the y-axis from the first flanking un-grounded conductor (14a) to the second flanking un-grounded conductor (14b). Thus if, for example, a rat, passes across the sensor a change in capacitance (Δ) occurs as illustrated in FIG. 2b, first increasing (22) and then decreasing (24).

[0096] The sensitivity of the sensor, and thus its ability to detect different objects, typically animals considered to be pests, is dependent on a number of factors including the materials used in making the triplet (14a-12-14b), their width (w), thickness (t), and the spacing (da and db) between the sensor conductor (12) and the un-grounded conductors (14a, 14b), as well as the nature of the conductive structure (18;20) forming the shielding support.

[0097] Thus, an exemplary sensor (10), suitable for detecting rats, is illustrated in FIGS. 3a and 3b. It takes the form of an elongate strip which is 100 mm wide and can be up to several meters in length. It, in fact, comprises an array of three sensors (10-1; 10-2; and 10-3). The three sensors are identical, and each comprises a triplet (14a-12-14b). In this embodiment each conductor of the triplet is a copper strip with a width (w) of about 2 mm, and a thickness (t) of about 0.05 mm. The sensor conductor (12) is spaced by a distance (da; db) of about 3 mm from each un-grounded conductor (14a; 14b), which are inset about 5 mm from the edge of the electrically isolated supporting substrate (18; 20), which is of aluminium (18) coated or encased in an insulating plastic (20). Each triplet is spaced from each other (dc) by about 27 mm. In the embodiment the whole sensor is encased in a protective plastics membrane.

[0098] A skilled person with an understanding of capacitance will recognise that the sizes given are merely illustrative and the sizes/materials can be varied to achieve the desired sensitivity for a given type of pest.

[0099] FIG. 4 illustrates the type of read out obtained when a rat traverses the sensor (10) of FIG. 3a in the direction of arrow Y. As it passes over a first sensor (10-1) there is an initial increase in capacitance, a rising edge event (22) as it approaches sensor conductor (12) from un-grounded conductor (14a) and then a falling edge event (24) as it departs sensor conductor (12) and approaches un-grounded conductor (14b). Then at a second sensor (10-2) one sees the same, and the same is true at a third sensor (10-3), assuming of course the rat travels in the one direction as indicated by arrow Y. The three sensor signals provide information that can be used to provide information not only on presence (detection) of the rat, but also on its direction of movement (50), speed, and when used in a bait station, its hesitation/feeding time. The sensors operate by measuring the capacitance tens of times per second and an algorithm compares sequential readings (26, 28, 30), e.g. current, previous, next and can continuously recalibrate the baseline, thereby reducing false positive readings. In other words the system is able to differentiate a rat from, for example, a leaf or a dirty wet paw print left by an animal.

[0100] The detection of a rising edge event (22) can be used in battery power management, such that the event detection can initiate an external interrupt causing a microprocessor (not shown) to change modes from a power saving “sleep” mode to “full power” mode.

[0101] FIGS. 5a to 5c help explain the significance of the conductor arrangement and their positioning on an un-grounded conductive substrate (18) which is electrically isolated (20) from said conductors (12, 14a, 14b) and its surroundings. The substrate may include an adhesive so it can be stuck to a surface.

[0102] FIG. 5a depicts a 3 conductor sensor (14a-12-14b) with no shield and un-grounded parallel conductors. ‘C’ is ‘ghost’ capacitance caused by the simple volume of copper, its inductance and overall resistance at the frequency used to interrogate the sensor.

[0103] FIG. 5b depicts the 3 conductor sensor with an earthed shield and un-grounded parallel conductors—undesirable. Capacitance values ‘A’ are desired, but ‘B’ values are undesirable;

[0104] FIG. 5c depicts the 3 conductor sensor with an un-earthed shield (18; 20) a sensor conductor (12) and a pair of un-grounded parallel conductors (14a, 14b) (as the invention). The resulting capacitance is mostly ‘A’ (desired) with no ghost capacitance (undesirable).

[0105] What these three FIGS. illustrate is that as the value of the ghost capacitance ‘C’ increases, the amount of capacitance ‘A’ change required to successfully ‘detect a pest’ increases, making the sensor less sensitive. This is because the sensor (10) operates by detecting sudden changes in the fringe capacitance field generated between the sensor conductor (12) and the two adjacent un-grounded conductors (14a, 14b). In FIG. 5c the sensor is shielded (18; 20) on its underside side to allow placement of the sensor on multiple surface types.

[0106] A further advantage arising from the fact the sensor is shielded on its underside is that it can be placed on multiple surface types, including metal surfaces.

[0107] The sensor construction also means that slow or persistent changes to the overall level of the fringe field can be calibrated away. This means liquid, debris or accumulated dirt will not stop the operation of the sensor.

[0108] The dynamic range of the sensor, even with multiple lengths of the sensor, is controlled by the ratio of the thickness (t) of the flat copper conductors to the spacing (da; db) between the un-grounded conductors (14a; 14b) in comparison to the sensing conductor (12). This allows various sensor configurations to be used to detect pests of varying size, from e.g. bedbugs to rats (or even larger animals, including humans).

[0109] The sensor activates ONLY when an object interferes with the fringe field, which is made directional by the un-grounded parallel conductors (14a, 14b) and the shielding from the un-grounded conductive substrate (18) which is electrically isolated (20). This gives a very sharp response from the sensor.

[0110] Applicant detects the entry (70) of a pest into a fringe field, and more importantly detects the exit (80) of the pest from the field (FIG. 2b).

[0111] The physical layout of at least two and preferably three or more sensors (as illustrated in FIG. 3) allows a sensor unit to additionally detect the direction of travel (50) of a pest over the sensor, adding valuable additional information to the customer. By setting an alert/alarm to trigger only in response to e.g. multiple events (e.g. activity at 10-1 and 10-2) within a controlled period of time (s) set by the system, false positive readings can be significantly reduced. The overall combination of these properties provides highly reliable detection in various environments and also facilitates the detection of the direction of motion of the pest.

[0112] Use of fringe capacitance also facilitates a reduction in power (and vastly increased battery life) by allowing the processor and RF mesh to be dormant when there is no activity.

[0113] For the detection of smaller pests, such as crawling insects a sensor with a different configuration may be desirable. One such suitable configuration is described with reference to FIG. 6.

[0114] In the configuration of FIG. 6 the sensor conductor (12), rather than being linear, is a substantially comb shaped element in which the teeth (12a, 12b, 12c . . . ) of the comb function as a plurality of sensor conductors (12). Similarly rather than their being two linear un-grounded conductors (14a, 14b), the un-grounded conductor (14) is a substantially comb shaped element in which pairs of teeth (14a; 14b) flank each sensor conductor (12a; 12b) etc. Thus, the respective sensor conductor and un-grounded conductor are disposed like facing and interlocking ″E″′s. These are electrically isolated on an ungrounded conductive substance (not shown) in the manner indicated in FIG. 5C.

[0115] In use the insect moves across overlapping triplets (14a-12-14b) in the direction of arrow Y.

[0116] In contrast to the rodent sensor, the sensor strips are narrower (about 14 mm in the exemplified strip). The conductor sensor has a width of about 2 mm, the un-grounded sensor has a width of about 2 mm and the spaced distance (da, db) between the two is about 1 mm Again the thickness of both sensors is about 0.05 mm.

[0117] Once again however, the skilled person will appreciate that the sizes are given merely to provide guidance and will appreciate that many variations are possible.

[0118] All of the sensors of the invention are incorporated into sensor units (100) and an example of one such unit is described with reference to FIG. 7. In FIG. 7 the sensor unit comprises a housing (110), which contains a power source (120), and a circuit board comprising a microprocessor (130), non-volatile memory (140), a transceiver (150), and a clock (160). The unit also has a connector (not visible) for connecting the sensor (10) thereto.

[0119] Preferably, the sensor unit has a camera (180) such as an infrared camera with IR led ‘flash’. The power source is preferably a high capacity, wide temperature range, battery and the sensor unit includes an inductive coil (190) for battery charging. Preferably the non-volatile memory acts as a sensor controller and the transceiver includes a radio frequency unit. As illustrated, the sensor (10) is in the form of a strip with electrical contacts thereon (not shown) facilitating easy connection.

[0120] The sensor units (100) are ideally suited for integration into a networked system (200), most preferably a mesh topology network (210).

[0121] FIG. 8 illustrates a simple system (200) employing three sensor units (100) which feed data (220) to a central node (230) in this case a PC. The PC is connected to the internet and can be accessed by a remote monitor (240).

[0122] FIG. 9 illustrates how a sensor unit (100) of the invention can integrate into a radio frequency (RF) mesh network (210). This figure illustrates the basics of the RF mesh network. Each sensor unit (100) (numbered 1-6 in this FIG.) will attempt to link directly to the central node PC (230). If this fails the unit will search for other units in range, and send them a message indicating its status. As the other units in range will also do this, the unit seeking to link will either receive one, several or no messages indicating the status of all ‘in range’ units. If no messages are received, the unit will go into stand-alone mode. If it receives a message from a ‘linked’ unit, it will send a message to be forwarded to the central node. The central node can determine from the content of all received messages, the topography of the mesh. The central node will then transmit ‘route instructions’ to all units on the mesh. These instructions will route all traffic by e.g. the following rules, SPF—Shortest Path First, and AEP—Alternate Equal Paths.

[0123] For example, unit 1 will send messages via unit 2 and 3 alternately, when unit 3 receives messages from unit 1, it will always send them via unit 4 to the central node. When unit 2 receives messages from unit 1 it will alternate sending via units 4 and 5. This method helps to evenly distribute message sending, using the fewest number of units possible, thus extending overall battery life.

[0124] The mesh is designed to be easily deployed, and to self-heal if links are lost or blocked. If the link between units 1 and 2 is lost, unit 1 switches to the link to unit 3, and reports the ‘loss of link’ between unit 1 and unit 2 to the central node. During normal operation, unit 2 would not use a link between units 2 and 3, but if the links between 2 and 4 and 2 and 5 are lost, the link will become active. If unit 4 loses its direct link to the central node, it will activate the link between unit 4 and unit 5. As long as there is a path to the central node, any unit connected to this path via a chain of any other units, will be able to report to the central node. Nodes with the correct ID can be instantly deployed into the mesh, which will re-map its topography automatically. If there is a disconnected unit or a break in the mesh after deployment, the central node will report this.

[0125] One particular benefit of the sensors of the invention is their versatility. FIG. 10 illustrates an example deployment of a sensor unit (100) within an air duct (90), showing a sensor deployed around the entire inner surface (92) of the duct, and another around the outside surface (94). Even if the ducting is made of metal the sensor technology is such that it still operates correctly.

[0126] Due to the nature of the RF mesh network logic and the properties of e.g. a 2.4 GHZ transceiver, the unit can remain part of a RF mesh network, external to the ducting, on condition that for metal ducting it is placed within range of a grill or air outlet.

[0127] FIG. 11 illustrates the deployment of the sensor units (100) to monitor goods (96) on a pallet (98). The sensor units (100) can be placed on or around goods and the length and flexible nature of the sensor (10) itself means the sensor can be wrapped around items.

[0128] FIG. 12 illustrates sensor units (100), numbered 1-7 and a system set up in a building shared by three different companies. Each company has a flexible rodent monitoring system installed. These are three independent designated mesh networks (designated a, b, and c as the suffix to the sensor unit). The RF meshes (a, b or c) are independent of each other. The RF mesh network protocol means that the meshes do not interfere with each other. “Mesh a” activity will not cause “mesh b” or “mesh c” to ‘wake up’ from power saving mode or uplink to a third party central node (230).