LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM EVALUATION BASED ON IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS
20240352922 ยท 2024-10-24
Inventors
Cpc classification
F03D80/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D17/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
G01R27/20
PHYSICS
F03D13/201
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05B2260/83
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D1/0675
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D17/028
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
G01R27/16
PHYSICS
Y02E10/72
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
F03D80/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D17/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D13/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03D1/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
H02G13/00
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A lightning protection system is provided, in particular for a rotor blade, the system including: i) a lightning conductor for conducting electrical energy of a lightning; and ii) a measurement device electrically coupled to the lightning conductor and configured to measure an impedance with respect to the lightning conductor. Further, a rotor blade and a wind turbine are provided.
Claims
1. A lightning protection system, for a rotor blade, comprising: a lightning conductor for conducting electrical energy of a lightning: and a measurement device electrically coupled to the lightning conductor and configured to measure an impedance with respect to the lightning conductor.
2. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, further comprising: an evaluation device configured to evaluate the lightning protection system, to determine a quality criterion, based on the impedance.
3. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the measurement device is, for measuring the impedance, further configured to provide an alternating current, AC, load to the lightning conductor, and sweep the AC load over a plurality of frequencies.
4. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the measurement device is, for measuring the impedance, further configured to perform a time domain based measurement.
5. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, further comprising: at least one conductor element electrically coupled to the lightning conductor and/or the measurement device; wherein the measurement device is further configured to measure an impedance of at least a part of the at least one conductor element.
6. The lightning protection system according to claim 5, wherein the lightning conductor and the at least one conductor element, are electrically connected in parallel.
7. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the measurement device comprises a first electrical connector and a second electrical connector, and wherein both the first electrical connector and the second electrical connector are connected to the lighting conductor or to an at least one conductor element.
8. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the measurement device comprises a first electrical connector and a second electrical connector, wherein the first electrical connector is connected to at least one conductor element, and wherein the second electrical connector is connected to the lighting conductor.
9. The lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the lighting conductor is configured as one of a cable, a rod, a bar; and/or wherein the system further comprises a spar cap which comprises or consists of an at least one conductor element.
10. A rotor blade comprising a lightning protection system according to claim 1.
11. A wind turbine comprising: a tower; and a wind rotor is arranged at a top portion of the tower, and which comprises at least one blade according to claim 10.
12. A method of evaluating a lightning protection system, according to claim 1, the method comprising: measuring an impedance with respect to a lightning conductor of the lighting protection system; and evaluating the lightning protection system based on the impedance.
13. The method according to claim 12, further comprising: mounting the evaluated lightning protection system, within a rotor blade, to a device to be protected.
14. A method comprising: utilizing an impedance analysis of a conductor to evaluate a lightning protection system of a rotor blade.
15. A method comprising: utilizing an impedance analysis of a conductor of a lightning protection system to evaluate a rotor blade construction.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0053] Some of the embodiments will be described in detail, with references to the following Figures, wherein like designations denote like members, wherein:
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0063] The illustration in the drawing is schematic. It is noted that in different figures, similar or identical elements or features are provided with the same reference signs or with reference signs, which are different from the corresponding reference signs only within the first digit. In order to avoid unnecessary repetitions elements or features which have already been elucidated with respect to a previously described embodiment are not elucidated again at a later position of the description.
[0064] Further, spatially relative terms, such as front and back, above and below, left and right, et cetera are used to describe an element's relationship to another element(s) as illustrated in the figures. Thus, the spatially relative terms may apply to orientations in use which differ from the orientation depicted in the figures. Obviously, all such spatially relative terms refer to the orientation shown in the figures only for ease of description and are not necessarily limiting as an apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention can assume orientations different than those illustrated in the figures when in use.
[0065] According to an exemplary embodiment, the described impedance measurement system provides an advantage in determining if essential electrical components of the lightning protection system have been connected properly. With the results of resistance measurements, in contrast, it may not be conclusive if a satisfactory electrical connection exists between the electrically conductive elements (spar cap) and the blade lightning protection system. The same holds true for monitoring using the present method, where impedances of the lightning protection system are measured during the lifetime of the blade, to determine if the quality changes over time. Here, the impedance measurements would also provide an improved method for determining the quality of the lightning protection system during the lifetime of the blade, e.g. during full-scale blade structural test or full-scale testing of the lightning protection system according to the standards given in IEC 61400-24.
[0066] According to a further exemplary embodiment, the impact of the described solution is a new and effective method for determining the quality of wind turbine blade lightning protection system before, during, and/or after production of the blade and turbine, together with a possibility to do repetitive testing of the lightning protection quality during the entire lifetime of the blade. This solution could be applied towards testing the lightning protection system of wind turbine blades before they leave the production facilities, to ensure quality and homogeneous performance across the different blades.
[0067] According to a further exemplary embodiment, the described method could in principle be used to measure the impedance between any (two) points in the electrical system of a blade.
[0068] According to a further exemplary embodiment, the analysis of the conductor element(s) can be performed before connecting it with the rest of the lightning protection system. In that way the impedance analysis of the (separate) conductor elements can be done before connecting the elements, and when the result is compared to the analysis of the full system, additional knowledge of the impedance behavior can be obtained.
[0069]
[0070] The lighting protection system 100 further comprises a measurement device 150 that is electrically connected via a first electric connection 151 and a second electric connection 152 to the lightning conductor 110 (at the tip and at the root). The measurement device 150 is configured to provide, through the electric connections 151, 152, an alternating current (AC) load (e.g. a voltage or a current) to the lightning conductor 110. Hereby, the measurement device 150 sweeps the AC load over a plurality of frequencies, and measure the corresponding impedance with respect to the lightning conductor 110. The measurement device 150 is further configured to provide the AC load (and frequency sweep) also to the conductor elements 120, 130. The lightning conductor 110 and the conductor elements 120, 130 are electrically connected in parallel. In another example, the impedance is measured using a time domain reflectometry-based method.
[0071] The lightning protection system 100 further comprises an evaluation device, that can be realized together with the measurement device 150, and that is configured to evaluate the lightning protection system 100 using an impedance analysis (of the impedance measurement). Such an evaluation may for example yield a quality criterion (e.g. functionality is fine, connection is fine, construction is fine) for the lightning protection system 100.
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0079]
[0080] In particular with increasing frequencies, the difference in impedance increases, making it possible to detect e.g. if an electrically conductive spar cap is not (properly) electrically connected with the rest of the lightning protection system.
[0081]
[0082]
[0083] On top of the tower 123 there is arranged a nacelle 122. In between the tower 123 and the nacelle 122 there is provided a yaw angle adjustment portion 121 which is capable of rotating the nacelle 122 around a non-depicted vertical axis being aligned with the longitudinal extension of the tower 123. By controlling the yaw angle adjustment portion 121 in an appropriate manner it can be made sure that during a normal operation of the wind turbine 101 the nacelle 122 is always properly aligned with the current wind direction.
[0084] The wind turbine 101 further comprises a wind rotor 111 having three blades 114. In the perspective of
[0085] In between the hub 112 and a blade 114 there is respectively provided a blade pitch angle adjustment device 116 in order to adjust the blade pitch angle of each blade 114 by rotating the respective blade 114 around an axis being aligned substantially parallel with the longitudinal extension of the respective blade 114. By controlling the blade pitch angle adjustment device 116, the blade pitch angle of the respective blade 114 can be adjusted in such a manner that, at least when the wind is not too strong, a maximum wind power can be retrieved from the available mechanical power of the wind driving the wind rotor 111.
[0086] As can be seen from
[0087] Further, a brake 126 is provided in order to safely stop the operation of the wind turbine 101 or the rotor 111 for instance in case of emergency.
[0088] The wind turbine 101 further comprises a control system for operating the wind turbine 101 in a highly efficient manner. Apart from controlling for instance the yaw angle adjustment device 121, the depicted control system is also used for adjusting the blade pitch angle of the rotor blades 114 using actuators 116 in an optimized manner.
[0089] Each of the blades 114 comprises a lighting protection system 100 (see
[0090] Although the present invention has been disclosed in the form of embodiments and variations thereon, it will be understood that numerous additional modifications and variations could be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention.
[0091] For the sake of clarity, it is to be understood that the use of a or an throughout this application does not exclude a plurality, and comprising does not exclude other steps or elements.