Efficient low-temperature, catalyst-free dehydrogenation of alkanes
20230037379 · 2023-02-09
Inventors
- Christopher Ryan Riley (Albuquerque, NM, US)
- Andrew De La Riva (Albuquerque, NM, US)
- Stanley Shihyao Chou (Albuquerque, NM, US)
- Abhaya Datye (Albuquerque, NM, US)
Cpc classification
C07C2523/62
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C5/327
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J3/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C07C5/327
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Steam cracking of ethane, a non-catalytic thermochemical process, remains the dominant means of ethylene production. The severe reaction conditions and energy expenditure involved in this process incentivize the search for alternative reaction pathways and reactor designs which maximize ethylene yield while minimizing cost and energy input. According to the present invention, ethylene yields as high as 68% were obtained with a quartz open tube reactor without the use of a catalyst or a cofed stream of oxidizing agents. The open tube reactor design promotes simplicity, low cost, and negligible coke formation. Reactor designs can be optimized to improve the conversion of ethane to ethylene via non-oxidative dehydrogenation, an approach which shows promise for decentralized production of ethylene from natural gas deposits.
Claims
1. A tube reactor for the dehydrogenation of an alkane, comprising an open quartz tube, and a furnace to heat the open quartz tube to a reactor temperature of between 575° C. and 750° C.
2. The tube reactor of claim 1, wherein the open quartz tube comprises a circular cross-section.
3. The tube reactor of claim 1, wherein an interior surface of the open quartz tube is smooth.
4. The tube reactor of claim 1, wherein the open quartz tube further comprises an axial rod or wire within the open quartz tube.
5. The tube reactor of claim 1, wherein the open quartz tube further comprises a packed bed within the open quartz tube.
6. The tube reactor of claim 5, wherein the packed bed comprises a catalyst.
7. The tube reactor of claim 5, wherein the packed bed comprises an inert material.
8. The tube reactor of claim 1, wherein the alkane comprises ethane or propane.
9. A method for dehydrogenation of an alkane, comprising providing a tube reactor comprising an open quartz tube, and a furnace to heat the open quartz tube; heating the open quartz tube to a reactor temperature of between 575° C. and 750° C.; and introducing a feed gas comprising an alkane into the heated open quartz tube, whereby the alkane is at least partially converted into an alkene.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the open quartz tube further comprises a packed bed.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the packed bed comprises a Pt-based catalyst.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the Pt-based catalyst comprises a Pt—Sn or Pt—Mn bimetallic catalyst.
13. The method of claim 9, wherein the alkane comprises ethane.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein the feed gas comprises 2.5 to 25% ethane in nitrogen.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] The detailed description will refer to the following drawings, wherein like elements are referred to by like numbers.
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] The present invention is directed to a tube reactor that can convert alkanes to alkenes with high yields without addition of a catalyst or co-fed steam or H.sub.2, meeting or exceeding benchmarks from steam cracking. For example, using a feed gas consisting of 2.5-25% ethane in nitrogen (consistent with ethane concentrations in natural gas deposits), a yield of 67% ethylene at a maximum reactor temperature near 750° C. was achieved. Careful preparation of reactor walls allows for negligible coke formation. Without the use of a catalyst or concern for coke formation, an open tube reactor demonstrates stable performance without any deactivation or the need for regeneration. A quartz tube reactor is not prone to carburization, which degrades conventional cracking furnace components. Pt-based catalysts are effective at low temperatures, such as 600° C. However, the performance of these catalysts deteriorates when operated at temperatures of 700° C. and higher. A simple open tube quartz reactor design that quenches the products and allows better heat integration can provide an alternative to the capital-intensive steam cracking process for distributed manufacturing of ethylene from shale gas.
[0017] As an example, multiple tube reactor configurations were tested to evaluate ethane dehydrogenation reactivity, including hollow open tube, annular, and packed beds containing catalysts as well as inert materials. Inert materials were tested to determine any beneficial effects in terms of initiating thermochemically-induced free radical reactions and low activity for ethylene hydrogenation or undesired coke formation at high temperatures, which may lower the yield. The reactor tubes preferably have a circular cross-section for ease of manufacture and less likelihood of coke formation at corners. However, other tube cross sections (e.g., square, rectangular) can also be used. The exemplary reactor tubes were made of fused silica quartz (4 mm ID and 6 mm OD), 316 L stainless-steel (3.5 mm ID and 6.35 mm OD), and alumina (4.75 mm ID and 6.35 mm OD with 99.5% purity). An Inconel wire and quartz rods were fitted within the quartz tube to create annular reactor configurations. A PtSn.sub.x/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 (nominal 0.5 wt % Pt) was obtained from a commercial supplier. A PtMn.sub.x/SiO.sub.2 catalyst (nominal 2 wt % Pt) was synthesized using the method described by Wu et al. through sequential incipient wetness impregnation of pH-adjusted aqueous solutions of manganese (II) nitrate tetrahydrate and tetraamine platinum (II) nitrate onto silica gel (200-425 mesh size, grade 643). See Z. Wu et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14870 (2018). The sample was dried under ambient conditions, calcined at 550° C., and then reduced for 30 minutes at 550° C. in a 50 ml/min flow of 10% hydrogen, balance nitrogen. The two platinum-containing catalysts are herein labeled “PtMn” and “PtSn”. Packed beds of 20 mg of catalyst were loaded upstream of a quartz wool plug situated in the hottest region of the reactor. Inert materials were loaded in the same fashion but were placed both in the hottest region of the reactor and downstream of the heated region during separate tests. The label “Downstream” or “DS” designates this latter sample location where applicable.
[0018]
[0019] Area counts generated from the GC FID signal were used to determine ethane and ethylene concentrations entering and exiting the reactors, since these counts are proportional to the concentration of those gaseous species. The nitrogen concentration in the gas flowing in and out of reactor (measured via TCD) was used as an internal standard to correct for the change in total moles of gas resulting from the dehydrogenation reaction. Since the molar flow rate of N.sub.2 through the reactor remains unchanged, the N.sub.2 counts cancel out of this equation providing a correction for the change in volume due to reaction. Similarly, the total GC FID area of the detected hydrocarbons allows the determination of a carbon balance. In these experiments, formation of coke was observed only in a few cases, generally when a catalyst was used. Coke formation was measured via several methods. Carbon analysis was conducted on spent Pt catalysts to quantify coke formation using an elemental analyzer. Recovered samples were combusted at 980° C. Carbon dioxide produced was separated via gas chromatography and detected using a mass spectrometer. Following an isothermal reaction at a furnace temperature of 700° C. for 4 hours in 5% ethane, the quartz tube with and without addition of quartz wool and PtMn.sub.x—SiO.sub.2 and PtSn.sub.x—Al.sub.2O.sub.3 catalysts was also visually inspected for coke deposits.
[0020] Physical characterization of the solids whose reactivity for ethane dehydrogenation was compared to that of an open tube reactor was conducted. As measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Pt content in PtSn and PtMn catalysts was 0.4 and 1.8 wt %, respectively, which is near the nominal loadings of 0.5 and 2 wt %. Ceria-zirconia contained 6.9 at % zirconium dopant. Composition and surface area for the select samples are listed in Table 1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Pt-containing catalysts show metallic particles several nanometers in diameter. Crystalline phases of ceria-zirconia, alumina, and quartz powders were confirmed via X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Prior to running reactions with these materials, temperature profiles were measured in the quartz, alumina, and stainless-steel reactors while flowing nitrogen through each. The temperatures within each reactor were measured in 1-inch segments along the 10-inch heated region of the reactor and referenced to a thermocouple built into the furnace but external to the reactor. These profiles show that the actual temperatures within the open tube reactors were, at highest, approximately 50° C. greater than the temperature recorded by the furnace thermocouple. For simplicity, data are presented as a function of the built-in furnace thermocouple temperature, which is referred to herein as the operating temperature.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 XRF compositional results and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area measurements of packed bed materials. Specific Composition (wt %) surface Sample Pt Sn Mn area (m.sup.2/g) PtSn.sub.x − Al.sub.2O.sub.3 0.4 3.3 — 196 PtMn.sub.x − SiO.sub.2 1.8 — 4.9 256 SBa 200 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 — — — 187 Quartz sand — — — 0.2 Quartz wool — — — 1.7 Composition (at %) Sample Ce Zr Ce.sub.1−xZr.sub.xO.sub.2−y 93.1 6.9
[0021] Ethane dehydrogenation was conducted first using open-tube reactors with 5% ethane feed in nitrogen and 20 ml/min total flow. As shown in
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Computed residence times and conversion at an operating temperature of 700° C. Reactor ID OD τ τ.sub.KA X.sub.ethane at tube (mm) (mm) (s) (s) 700° C. (%) Alumina 4.50 6.35 4.02 3.57 68.7 Quartz 4.00 6.00 3.07 2.82 74.5 Quartz 4.00 6.00 2.30 2.12 75.1 (rod) (2.00)* SS 3.50 6.35 2.40 2.17 51.1 *Quartz tube reactor (ID 4 mm) with an annular quartz rod (OD 2 mm) inserted through the whole length of the heated zone to create an annular flow pattern.
[0022] Table 3 lists the concentration of significant gaseous reactants, products, and inerts detected via GC measurement during reactions with the open tube reactors. Methane is the dominant undesired gaseous product of ethane dehydrogenation within each open tube reactor. However, methane remains a very minor product, even at the highest temperatures tested. Molar ratios of H.sub.2/C.sub.2H.sub.4 remain close to unity for the open tube reactors as evident from the concentration ratios, which confirms the high selectivity toward ethylene and negligible coke formation. These results agree with those in a study by Xu et al., who found similar product distribution trends and H.sub.2/C.sub.2H.sub.4 ratios near unity when conducting ethane pyrolysis in a quartz tube reactor, which held for 50% ethane feed and temperatures higher than those used in this present study. See C. Xu et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 10470 (2011). The reported energy barrier for activation of C—H bonds is higher for ethylene than for ethane, which contributes to the selectivity of the thermal dehydrogenation reaction in the absence of an oxidizing agent. See E. Heracleous and A. A. Lemonidou, Appl. Catal. A 269, 123 (2004); and A. M. Dean, J. Phys. Chem. 89, 4600 (1985). Materials such as iron and nickel within steel steam cracking coils are known to catalyze coke formation, particularly during start up. Taniewski et al. reported decomposition of ethylene within a stainless-steel tube reactor into carbon, methane, and hydrogen during ethane pyrolysis. See M. Taniewski et al., Catal. Today 13, 529 (1992). On the other hand, the authors note the relative stability within a silica reactor. Carbon mass balances were computed through gas chromatograph measurements of the gas compositions entering and exiting the reactors, which are also listed in Table 3. Approximately 95-100% of the carbon entering the reactor tubes as ethane is accounted for as methane, ethylene, ethane, propane, and propene exiting each reactor. Previous studies of ethane pyrolysis within inert tube reactors detected additional gaseous products, including acetylene, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, n-butane, toluene, 1-butene, and allene. See M. H. Saldana et al., Energ. Fuels 30, 9703 (2016). These were not detected in the present experiments, likely due to very low concentrations, which may account for the discrepancy in the carbon balances listed. The low concentrations of ethane limit the accuracy of TCD measurements, and the GC analysis using the FID detector did not detect hydrocarbons beyond C.sub.1-C.sub.3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Gaseous products measured in mole percent as a function of temperature from reaction of 5% ethane feed gas in open tube reactors. Quartz tube H.sub.2 N.sub.2 CH.sub.4 C.sub.2H.sub.6 C.sub.2H.sub.4 C.sub.3H.sub.8 C.sub.3H.sub.6 C Temp (mol (mol (mol (mol (mol (mol (mol X.sub.C.sub.
[0023] Since the open quartz tube showed the highest yield for ethylene, an annular flow geometry within the quartz tube reactor may be beneficial by changing gas flow dynamics. An annular reactor geometry was accomplished by adding either an Inconel wire or a quartz rod to the center of the open quartz tube. The quartz rod was axially positioned either within the entire heated region (labeled as “full length”) or within the downstream half of the heated region (“half length”) of the reactor tube on separate tests. Results from the annular tube reactor experiments are shown in
[0024] Next, packed beds containing 20 mg of quartz sand, alumina powder, and ceria-zirconia powder were added to the quartz tube reactor. Where specified, the beds were placed downstream of the heated region of the reactor. Otherwise, the beds were positioned in the hottest region. All were supported by a quartz wool plug placed downstream of the bed. These materials are catalytically inert, however, their addition provides significantly more surface area within the reactor, which may be beneficial if the reaction was surface catalyzed. Results of the packed bed reactor experiments are shown in
[0025] As shown in Table 4, addition of each inert material actually had a detrimental effect on ethylene yield over the entire temperature range tested. Ethane conversion was consistently lower with the addition of a packed bed to an empty tube. Selectivity was also reduced in the presence of alumina powder due in part to higher methane production. Although an annular quartz rod had little effect on reactor performance at high temperatures, addition of quartz sand lowered performance. The open quartz tube provided an ethane conversion of 74.5% at a set furnace temperature of 700° C., which decreased to 68.7% when quartz sand was added downstream of the reactor and to 65.4% when quartz sand was added to the hottest region of the reactor. Addition of these packed bed materials likely alters flow characteristics from open tube and annular configurations. Further, powder addition significantly increases the area of solid surface which may help quench free radical reactions, limiting the extent of ethane conversion. The added solid also changes the void volume in the open tube reactor. An estimated 8 mg of quartz wool was added to retain the packed bed. At a nominal bulk density of 1 g/cc, the occupied volume is 0.028 ml. The volume of the quartz reactor is 3.19 ml, hence the added solids have very minimal impact on the residence time of the gas. However, since the added solid is located in the hottest region of the reactor, it leads to lowering the heated volume for thermal reactions.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Gaseous products (measured in mole percent), ethane conversion, ethylene yield, and carbon balance as a function of temperature from reaction of 5% ethane feed gas in a quartz reactor packed with inert powders. C Temp X.sub.C.sub.
[0026] The addition of 20 mg packed beds of PtMn.sub.x—SiO.sub.2 and PtSn.sub.x— Al.sub.2O.sub.3 catalysts (labeled as “PtMn” and “PtSn” for simplicity) to the quartz tube reactor was examined. Catalyst beds were always placed in the hottest region of the reactor. Results from the catalyst packed bed reactor experiments are shown in
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Gaseous products (measured in mole percent) as a function of temperature from reaction of 5% ethane feed gas in quartz tube reactors loaded with catalyst beds. C Temp X.sub.C.sub.
[0027] A comparison of performance stability between the catalyzed and non-catalyzed reactor configurations was evaluated by running consecutive reactions using the quartz tube with and without a packed bed of PtMn catalyst. The reaction was run as previously described, while heating from 575° C. to 700° C. The reactor was cooled to room temperature in flowing nitrogen before performing a second run without any regeneration. The results are shown in
[0028] An additional stability test was performed by adding 20 mg of fresh PtMn and PtSn catalysts to the quartz tube reactor, beginning the reaction at 700° C., and maintaining this temperature for 4 hours. This test was also performed with the open quartz tube alone and the quartz tube with a quartz wool plug added in the same position as used with packed catalyst beds. Results show steady performance from each reactor configuration in terms of yield, conversion, and selectivity, as shown in
[0029] The effect of ethane concentration in feed gas was evaluated while testing the quartz open tube reactor between 575-700° C. with 2.5, 5, 10, and 25% ethane in nitrogen while keeping the N.sub.2 flow rate unchanged. At a furnace set temperature of 700° C. in the quartz tube reactor, the ethylene formation rate increases linearly with ethane partial pressure, suggesting the reaction is first order with respect to ethane. Sundaram et al. similarly found the ethane thermal cracking reaction to be first order. See K. M. Sundaram et al., AIChE J. 27(6), 946 (1981). Ethane conversion decreased with higher ethane concentrations, while ethylene selectivity varied only between 86.4-89.5% at 700° C. among the different ethane concentrations, as shown in shown in
[0030] Significant effort has been dedicated toward the development of catalysts which can withstand demanding conditions involved in ethane dehydrogenation. Often these studies do not distinguish the roles of the catalytic and thermal reactions, which become obscured at high reaction temperatures. Particularly in non-oxidative dehydrogenation studies, dehydrogenation activity may be mistakenly ascribed to the catalyst, whereas thermally induced free radical reactions are actually the dominant pathway. As described herein, high ethylene yield and selectivity can be achieved thermally with a simple open tube reactor. Introduction of both catalytic and inert materials into the heated reactor region was detrimental to the thermal reaction, resulting in lowered yield. Open tube reactors have been studied in the past, usually in the context of the oxidative coupling of methane. In their study of the OCM reaction, Keller and Bhasin found that a stainless-steel tube reactor led primarily to the formation of CO.sub.2, but that a quartz tube was completely inert at temperatures ranging from 700° C. to 960° C. See G. E. Keller and M. M. Bhasin, J. Catal. 73, 9 (1982). Taniewski et al. demonstrated the stability of ethylene in a silica tube reactor at 700° C. and a lower tendency toward coke formation compared to stainless steel reactors. See M. Taniewski et al., Catal. Today 13, 529 (1992). Xu et al. achieved an ethylene yield of 56% with 61.7% conversion and 90.8% selectivity when using an open quartz tube reactor with 50% ethane feed gas. See C. Xu et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 10470 (2011).
[0031] The present invention has been described as efficient, low-temperature, catalyst-free dehydrogenation of alkanes in a tube reactor. It will be understood that the above description is merely illustrative of the applications of the principles of the present invention, the scope of which is to be determined by the claims viewed in light of the specification. Other variants and modifications of the invention will be apparent to those of skill in the art.