Micro powder for preparing neodymium-iron-boron permanent magnet material, method for preparing powder by target-type jet milling, and powder

Abstract

The current invention discloses a type of micronized powder for manufacturing sintered Neodymium magnetic material, a target type jet mill pulverization method to prepare the micronized powder, and the resulting pulverized powder. The Neodymium magnet powder created under the method is of sphericity of greater than or equal to 90% and of particle adhesion rate of less than or equal to 10%. A is the diameter of the target center, B is the diameter of the side nozzle, and C is the distance between the target center and the nozzle. The relationship amongst A, B and C is A/B=m×(C/A+B), where m ranges from 1 to 7. A velocity of the jet stream from side nozzle is between about 320 m/s to about 580 m/s.

Claims

1. A pulverization method for preparing micronized powder, wherein: a relationship amongst a diameter A of a target, a diameter B of a side nozzle, and a distance C between a center of the target and the side nozzle is A/B=m×(C/(A+B)), m ranging from 1 to 7, a velocity of a jet stream from the side nozzle being about 320 m/s to about 580 m/s; and a relationship between a diameter of a classifier wheel F and the diameter of the target A is F=p×A, p ranging from 3 to 6.

2. The pulverization method according to claim 1, further comprising: collecting the micronized powder including: flowing pulverized powder having the micronized powder and an ultrafine powder into a cyclone separator; filtering out the ultrafine powder having diameters less than about 1 μm at an exit of the cyclone separator; and collecting the micronized powder at another exit of the cyclone separator after the ultrafine powder is filtered out; wherein the cyclone separator comprises a baffle having a flange which comprises a plurality of holes with diameters of less than or equal to about 1 μm.

3. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein m is in a range of 2 to 5.

4. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein the velocity of the jet stream from the side nozzle is about 400 m/s to about 520 m/s.

5. The pulverization method claimed in claim 1, wherein p is in a range of 3.5 to 4.5.

6. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein the target, the side nozzle, and the classifier wheel are made of silicon nitride.

7. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein a pulverizing gas is nitrogen and a pulverizing pressure is in a range of about 0.3 MPa to about 0.8 MPa.

8. The pulverization method according to claim 7, wherein the pulverizing pressure is about 0.4 MPa to about 0.7 MPa.

9. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein no material residual is produced.

10. The pulverization method according to claim 2, wherein the ultrafine powder is less than about 0.5% of the pulverized powder in total mass.

11. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein the micronized powder is characterized by a sphericity of greater than 90% and a particle adhesion rate of less than 10%.

12. The pulverization method according to claim 1, wherein: particle size D.sub.50 of the micronized powder is about 2 μm to about 5 μm and D.sub.90/D.sub.10 of the micronized powder is equal to about 2 to about 5; and a nitrogen concentration of the micronized powder is equal or less than 300 ppm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from example 1 (magnification ×10000).

(2) FIG. 2 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from comparative example 1 (magnification ×10000).

(3) FIG. 3 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from example 1 (magnification ×5000).

(4) FIG. 4 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from comparative example 1 (magnification ×5000).

(5) FIG. 5 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from example 1 (magnification ×4000).

(6) FIG. 6 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from comparative example 1 (magnification ×4000).

(7) FIG. 7 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from example 1 (magnification ×2000).

(8) FIG. 8 is microstructural imaging photograph of the micronized powder samples from comparative example 1 (magnification ×2000).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) As used herein, the term “about” indicates the value of a given quantity that can vary based on a particular technology node associated with the subject semiconductor device. Based on the particular technology node, the term “about” can indicate a value of a given quantity that varies within, for example, 10-30% of the value (e.g., ±10%, ±20%, or ±30% of the value).

(10) Target type jet mill pulverization method adopts nitrogen gas as pulverizing gas and silicon nitride de Laval nozzle as the side nozzle, which in the only nozzle in the system. The commonly used fluidized bed jet mill pulverization requires two nozzles with one on the side and the other at the bottom. In the present disclosure, the target is made of silicon nitride.

(11) A is the diameter of the target, B is the diameter of the side nozzle, and C is the distance between the target and the nozzle. The relationship amongst A, B and C is: A/B=m×(C/(A+B)), where m ranges from 1 to 7, preferably from 2 to 5. The dispersion of particle size distribution can be effectively decreased by limiting the value of m.

(12) In the present disclosure, stream velocity from side nozzle can be accordingly adjusted in the range of about 320 m/s to about 580 m/s, preferably in the range of about 400 m/s to about 520 m/s. In the present disclosure, nitrogen gas is adopted as pulverizing gas. The pulverization process is effective with particle size uniformly distributed. Relationship between the diameter of the classifier wheel F, which could be made from silicon nitride, and the diameter of target A is: F=p×A, wherein p ranges from 3 to 6, preferably from 3.5 to 4.5.

(13) In the present disclosure, the pulverizing pressure is in the range of about 0.3 MPa to about 0.8 MPa, preferably in the range of about 0.3 MPa to about 0.7 MPa for better particle size distribution.

(14) In the present disclosure, the pulverized powder consists only ultrafine powder and the desired micronized powder after target type jet mill pulverization with little or no material residual, wherein the ultrafine powder takes no more than 0.5% of total powder production in weight. Given the fact that the present disclosure only produces ultrafine powder and the desired micronized powder after pulverization, thus the ultrafine powder takes no more than 0.5% of total powder input in weight.

(15) In traditional fluidized jet mill pulverization, residual materials will be produced in the grinding chamber resulting not only low efficiency in pulverization but also deviations in particle size, density and composition in the pulverized powder. Further material input is required to mix with such residual materials to continue pulverizing. The present disclosure, however, produces no residual materials in the target type jet mill pulverization method with particle size of the powder uniformly distributed along the entire process.

(16) In the present disclosure, the method produces ideal Neodymium magnetic material powder by controlling the value as m and p as well as velocity of the jet stream from the side nozzle.

(17) In the present disclosure, the micronized powder produced is characterized by nitrogen content ≤300 ppm, sphericity >90% and particle adhesion rate ≤10%. The micronized powder particle size D.sub.50 is about 2 μm to about 5 μm while D.sub.90/D.sub.10 is equal to about 2 to about 5 with low dispersion in particle size distribution. In the present disclosure, D.sub.X represents the diameter of the particle which divides the mass of the micronized powder into a specified percentage when the particles are arranged on an ascending mass basis, e.g., in a particle size distribution curve. For example, D.sub.10 is the diameter at which 10% of the mass of the micronized powder is comprised of particles with a diameter less than D.sub.10, and D.sub.90 is the diameter at which 90% of the mass of the micronized powder is comprised of particles with a diameter less than D.sub.90. D.sub.50, also referred to as the median diameter, represents the diameter of the particle that 50% of the mass of the micronized powder is smaller than and 50% of a sample's mass is larger than.

(18) In the present disclosure, the pulverized powder, formed from a mixture of coarse alloy powder (e.g., Neodymium powder) and lubricator undergoing a target type jet mill pulverization process, includes the micronized powder. The micronized powder may be flown into a cyclone separator to filtering out particles with diameters greater than 1 μm. The micronized powder may be steered by a carrier gas (e.g., nitrogen) and flown towards an exit (e.g., an upper exit) of the cyclone separator. The micronized powder and the carrier gas may be separated due to the gravity and centrifugal force. The micronized powder may then be flown through a flange of a baffle at the exit of the cyclone separator. The flange may have a circular shape and may include a plurality of holes with diameters of less than or equal to about 1 μm. The flange may filter out particles having diameters less than 1 μm. The micronized powder, after particles with diameters of less than about 1 μm are filtered out, may be collected using a collecting device. That is, the flange may prevent particles with diameters less than 1 μm to be collected in the collecting device at another exit (e.g., a lower exit).

(19) In the present disclosure, a particle in the micronized powder with an aspect ratio (e.g., a ratio of a length along the vertical direction over a width along the horizontal direction of a two-dimensional object) of about 1:1 observed in the microstructural imaging photographs (e.g., FIGS. 1-8) is regarded as a spherical particle. In some embodiments, the aspect ratio is determined to be in a desired range to determine the sphericity of the micronized powder. For example, it can be determined that a particle with an aspect ratio within a range of ±10% of 1:1 (e.g., 0.9:1, 0.95:1, 0.98:1, 1:1, 1:1.02, 1:1.05, and 1:1.1) can be consider a spherical particle. In another example, it can be determined that a particle with an aspect ratio within a range of ±15% of 1:1 (e.g., 0.85:1, 0.9:1, 0.95:1, 0.98:1, 1:1, 1:1.02, 1:1.05, 1:1.1, and 1:1.15) can be consider a spherical particle. The specific values of the upper and lower limits of the range should not be limited by the embodiments of the present disclosure.

(20) In the present disclosure, a sphericity of the micronized powder can be defined to be a total number of spherical particles divided by a total number of particles observed in the micronized powder. In some embodiments, a sample having a number of particles, e.g., 500 particles, can be selected. The number of spherical particles in the sample can be determined. The sphericity of the sample can then be calculated as the number of spherical particles divided by 500. In some embodiments, the sphericity of the sample can be used to represent the sphericity of a portion or all the particles of the micronized powder.

(21) In the present disclosure, a particle, observed in the microstructural imaging photographs, adhering to other particles having diameters of less than about 1 μm is regarded as having little or no adhesion. In some embodiments, it is determined the diameters are within a desired range, e.g., ±10% or ±15% of 1 μm (e.g., 0.95 μm, 0.98 μm, 1 μm, 1.05 μm, 1.08 μm, and 1.1 μm), and particles observed with adhesion to other particles having diameters in the range are determined to have little or no adhesion. Accordingly, a particle observed with adhering to other particles having diameters of about 1 μm or greater than 1 μm can be regarded as having adhesion. In some embodiments, a number of particles having adhesion is determined to be a total number of particles observed in the microstructural imaging photographs subtracted by a number of particles having little or no adhesion. The specific values of the upper and lower limits of the range should not be limited by the embodiments of the present disclosure. In the present disclosure, a particle adhesion rate can be defined as a number of particles having adhesion divided by the total number of particle observed.

(22) The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of no more than 1% in total weight and then pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength no less than 1.4 T. The die is then sintered in a vacuum furnace under temperature region between 1000 degrees Celsius and 1100 degrees Celsius. The sintered powder undergoes tempering treatment twice respectively under temperature ranges of between about 860 degrees Celsius to about 930 degrees Celsius and between about 450 degrees Celsius to about 550 degrees Celsius before the formation of raw magnet is completed.

Example 1

(23) Neodymium alloy is processed in a strip caster to form thin strip of average thickness of about 0.32 mm, wherein its composition is Nd.sub.31D.sub.y1Co.sub.1Cu.sub.0.1Zr.sub.0.08Ga.sub.0.12Al.sub.0.1Nb.sub.0.3Fe.sub.ba1B.sub.0.97 (wt. %). The strip is then crushed into coarse powder through HD method and mixed with lubricator of about 0.05% in weight percentage by powder blender. The mixture undergoes target type jet mill pulverization afterwards, wherein pulverizing pressure is about 0.6 MPa. Jet steam nozzle and target are silicon nitride de Laval nozzle, where m is equal to 3 in the function involving the diameter of the target, diameter of the side nozzle and the distance between the target and the nozzle. Velocity of the jet stream is about 400 m/s from the nozzle. In the meantime, a ceramic classifier is selected wherein p=4 in the equation involving the diameter of the classifier and of the target. The produced pulverized powder consists of desired micronized powder which takes about 99.5% in total mass and ultrafine powder which takes about 0.5% in total mass with no residual material in the grinding chamber. The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of about 0.1 wt % by powder blender and pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength greater than 1.4 T. The die is sintered in a vacuum furnace at 1050 degrees Celsius for about 4 hours, and two tempering treatments for about 2 hours at about 930 degrees Celsius and for 3 hours at about 480 degree Celsius respectively to form Neodymium magnets.

Comparative Example 1

(24) The process described above in example 1 is repeated, wherein identical Neodymium alloy strip is prepared and processed through HD to form coarse powder. The coarse powder then undergoes fluidized bed jet mil pulverization instead of target type jet mill pulverization in example 1 to form Neodymium magnets. The following pressing and sintering processes share the same parameter settings as those in example 1. TABLE 1 shows preparation methods, powder specifications and magnetic performances of Neodymium magnetics formed in example 1 and comparative example 1. In TABLES 1-5 of the present disclosure, for ease of illustration, examples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are represented by “Exmp.” 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; nitrogen concentration is represented by “N.sub.2 Conc.”; and comparative example 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are represented by “Comp. Exmp.” 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

(25) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF PREPARATION METHODS, POWDER SPECIFICATIONS AND MAGNETIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN EXAMPLE 1 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 N.sub.2 Yield Conc. D.sub.50 B.sub.r H.sub.cJ (BH).sub.max Method rate (ppm) (um) D.sub.90/D.sub.10 (kGs) (kOe) H.sub.k/H.sub.cj (MGsOe) Exmp. 1 99.5% 120 3.35 3.98 13.22 21.54 0.99 42.26 Comp. 97.5% 575 4.56 5.42 13.21 18.26 0.93 41.88 Exmp. 1

(26) According to TABLE 1, the yield rate of Neodymium magnetic material manufacturing in example 1 is greater than that of comparative example 1. The micronized powder prepared in example 1 has lower nitrogen concentration, lower dispersion in particle size distribution and better performances in coercivity and squareness in sintered magnets. Therefore, target type jet mill pulverization method in example 1 not only increases yield rate in micronized powder production but produces magnets of better coercivity and squareness with such micronized powder as raw material.

(27) Meanwhile, a comparison was made between particles produced by target type jet mill pulverization and fluidized bed jet mill pulverization. FIG. 1 through FIG. 8 are microstructural imaging photographs of the micronized powder samples from example 1 and comparative example 1 at different magnifications, wherein statistical analysis was performed for 500 particles in each sample. The results show, in example 1, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 92.5% of the total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 98.5%; whereas in comparative example 1, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 70.9% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 92.5%.

Example 2

(28) Neodymium alloy is processed in a strip caster to form thin strip of average thickness of 0.1 mm, wherein its composition is (PrNd).sub.30.8Co.sub.0.5Cu.sub.0.06Zr.sub.0.10Ga.sub.0.10Al.sub.0.3Nb.sub.0.3Fe.sub.ba1B.sub.0.94(wt. %). The strip is then crushed into coarse powder through HD method and mixed with lubricator of about 0.5% in weight percentage by powder blender. The mixture undergoes target type jet mill pulverization afterwards, wherein pulverizing pressure is about 0.3 MPa; jet steam nozzle and target are silicon nitride de Laval nozzle; m equals 2 in the function involving the diameter of the target, diameter of the side nozzle and the distance between the target and the nozzle; velocity of the jet stream is about 520 m/s from the nozzle. In the meantime, a ceramic classifier is selected wherein p=3.5 in the equation involving the diameter of the classifier and of the target. The produced pulverized powder consists of desired micronized powder which takes about 99.7% in total mass and ultrafine powder which takes about 0.3% in total mass with no residual material in the grinding chamber. The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of about 0.3 wt % by powder blender and pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength greater than 1.4 T. The die is sintered in a vacuum furnace at 1040 degrees Celsius for about 4 hours, and two tempering treatment for about 2 hours at about 890 degrees Celsius and for about 3 hours at about 490 degrees Celsius respectively to form Neodymium magnets.

Comparative Example 2

(29) The process described above in example 2 is repeated, wherein identical Neodymium alloy strip is prepared and processed through HD to form coarse powder. The coarse powder then undergoes fluidized bed jet mil pulverization instead of target type jet mill pulverization in example 2 to form Neodymium magnets. The following pressing and sintering processes share the same parameter settings as those in example 2. TABLE 2 shows preparation methods, powder specifications and magnetic performances of Neodymium magnetics formed in example 2 and comparative example 2.

(30) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF PREPARATION METHODS, POWDER SPECIFICATIONS AND MAGNETIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN EXAMPLE 2 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 N.sub.2 Yield Conc. D.sub.50 B.sub.r H.sub.cJ (BH).sub.max Method Rate (ppm) (um) D.sub.90/D.sub.10 (kGs) (kOe) H.sub.k/H.sub.cj (MGsOe) Exmp. 2 99.7% 175 3.56 3.42 13.85 16.94 0.97 46.63 Comp. 97.8% 620 4.35 5.98 13.79 15.92 0.92 46.21 Exmp. 2

(31) According to TABLE 2, the yield rate of Neodymium magnetic material manufacturing in example 2 is greater than that of comparative example 2. The micronized powder prepared in example 2 has lower nitrogen concentration, lower dispersion in particle size distribution and better performances in coercivity and squareness in sintered magnets. Therefore, target type jet mill pulverization method in example 2 not only increases yield rate in micronized powder production but produces magnets of better coercivity and squareness with such micronized powder as raw material.

(32) Meanwhile, a comparison was made between particles produced by target type jet mill pulverization and fluidized bed jet mill pulverization. Statistical analysis was performed for 500 particles in each sample. The results show, in example 2, particles with no adhesion takes about 91.6% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 96.0%; whereas in comparative example 2, particles with no adhesion takes about 73.4% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 82.5%.

Example 3

(33) Neodymium alloy is processed in a strip caster to form thin strip of average thickness of 0.4 mm, wherein its composition is (PrNd).sub.26Dy.sub.5Co.sub.1.3Cu.sub.0.15Zr.sub.0.08Ga.sub.0.16Al.sub.0.25Fe.sub.ba1B.sub.0.97 (wt. %). The strip is then crushed into coarse powder through HD method and mixed with lubricator of about 0.3% in weight percentage by powder blender. The mixture undergoes target type jet mill pulverization afterwards, wherein pulverizing pressure is about 0.8 MPa. Jet steam nozzle and target are silicon nitride de Laval nozzle, where m equals 5 in the function involving the diameter of the target, diameter of the side nozzle and the distance between the target and the nozzle. Velocity of the jet stream is about 320 m/s from the nozzle. In the meantime, a ceramic classifier is selected wherein p=4.5 in the equation involving the diameter of the classifier and of the target. The produced pulverized powder consists of desired micronized powder which takes about 99.6% in total mass and ultrafine powder which takes about 0.4% in total mass with no residual material in the grinding chamber. The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of about 0.3 wt % by powder blender and pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength greater than 1.4 T. The die is sintered in a vacuum furnace at about 1065 degrees Celsius for about 4 hours, and two tempering treatment for about 2 hours at about 920 degrees Celsius and for about 6 hours at about 480 degree Celsius respectively to form Neodymium magnets.

Comparative Example 3

(34) The process described above in example 3 is repeated, wherein identical Neodymium alloy strip is prepared and processed through HD to form coarse powder. The coarse powder then undergoes fluidized bed jet mil pulverization instead of target type jet mill pulverization in example 3 to form Neodymium magnets. The following pressing and sintering processes share the same parameter settings as those in example 3. TABLE 3 shows preparation methods, powder specifications and magnetic performances of Neodymium magnetics formed in example 3 and comparative example 3.

(35) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF PREPARATION METHODS, POWDER SPECIFICATIONS AND MAGNETIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN EXAMPLE 3 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 N.sub.2 Yield Conc. B.sub.r H.sub.cJ (BH).sub.max Method Rate (ppm) D.sub.50 (um) D.sub.90/D.sub.10 (kGs) (kOe) H.sub.k/H.sub.cj (MGsOe) Exmp. 3 99.6% 205 2.96 3.15 12.45 28.97 0.95 36.45 Comp. 98.1% 592 4.28 5.43 12.39 26.82 0.89 36.32 Exmp. 3

(36) According to table 3, the yield rate of Neodymium magnetic material manufacturing in example 3 is greater than that of comparative example 3. The micronized powder prepared in example 3 has lower nitrogen concentration, lower dispersion in particle size distribution and better performances in coercivity and squareness in sintered magnets. Therefore, target type jet mill pulverization method in example 3 not only increases yield rate in micronized powder production but produces magnets of better coercivity and squareness with such micronized powder as raw material.

(37) Meanwhile, a comparison was made between particles produced by target type jet mill pulverization and fluidized bed jet mill pulverization. Statistical analysis was performed for 500 particles in each sample. The results show, in example 3, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 93.5% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 97.2%; whereas in comparative example 3, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 76.8% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 87.4%.

Example 4

(38) Neodymium alloy is processed in a strip caster to form thin strip of average thickness of about 0.15 mm, wherein its composition is Nd.sub.31Dy.sub.1Co.sub.1Cu.sub.0.1Zr.sub.0.08Ga.sub.0.12Al.sub.0.1Nb.sub.0.3Fe.sub.ba1B.sub.0.97 (wt. %). The strip is then crushed into coarse powder through HD method and mixed with lubricator of about 0.05% in weight percentage by powder blender. The mixture undergoes target type jet mill pulverization afterwards, wherein pulverizing pressure is about 0.4 MPa. Jet steam nozzle and target are silicon nitride de Laval nozzle, where m equals 1 in the function involving the diameter of the target, diameter of the side nozzle and the distance between the target and the nozzle. Velocity of the jet stream is about 580 m/s from the nozzle. In the meantime, a ceramic classifier is selected wherein p=3 in the equation involving the diameter of the classifier and of the target. The produced pulverized powder consists of desired micronized powder which takes about 99.5% in total mass and ultrafine powder which takes about 0.5% in total mass with no residual material in the grinding chamber. The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of about 0.3 wt % by powder blender and pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength greater than 1.4 T. The die is sintered in a vacuum furnace at about 1050 degree Celsius for about 4 hours, and two tempering treatment for about 2 hours at about 920 degree Celsius and for about 3 hours at about 480 degree Celsius respectively to form Neodymium magnets.

Comparative Example 4

(39) The process described above in example 4 is repeated, wherein identical Neodymium alloy strip is prepared and processed through HD to form coarse powder. The coarse powder then undergoes fluidized bed jet mil pulverization instead of target type jet mill pulverization in example 4 to form Neodymium magnets. The following pressing and sintering processes share the same parameter settings as those in example 4. TABLE 4 shows preparation methods, powder specifications and magnetic performances of Neodymium magnetics formed in example 4 and comparative example 4.

(40) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 COMPARISON OF PREPARATION METHODS, POWDER SPECIFICATIONS AND MAGNETIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN EXAMPLE 4 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4 N.sub.2 Yield Conc. B.sub.r H.sub.cJ (BH).sub.max Method Rate (ppm) D.sub.50 (um) D.sub.90/D.sub.10 (kGs) (kOe) H.sub.k/H.sub.cj (MGsOe) Exmp. 4 99.5% 203 3.82 4.17 13.22 20.26 0.96 42.26 Comp. 97.5% 575 4.56 5.42 13.21 18.26 0.93 41.88 Exmp. 4

(41) According to TABLE 4, the yield rate of Neodymium magnetic material manufacturing in example 4 is greater than that of comparative example 4. The micronized powder prepared in example 4 has lower nitrogen concentration, lower dispersion in particle size distribution and better performances in coercivity and squareness in sintered magnets. Therefore, target type jet mill pulverization method in example 4 not only increases yield rate in micronized powder production but produces magnets of better coercivity and squareness with such micronized powder as raw material.

(42) Meanwhile, a comparison was made between particles produced by target type jet mill pulverization and fluidized bed jet mill pulverization. Statistical analysis was performed for 500 particles in each sample. The results show, in example 4, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 90.8% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 96.2%; whereas in comparative example 4, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 70.9% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 80.3%.

Example 5

(43) Neodymium alloy is processed in a strip caster to form thin strip of average thickness of 0.20 mm, wherein its composition is Nd.sub.31Dy.sub.1Co.sub.0.1Cu.sub.0.08Zr.sub.0.08Ga.sub.0.12Al.sub.0.1Nb.sub.0.3Fe.sub.ba1B.sub.0.97 (wt. %). The strip is then crushed into coarse powder through HD method and mixed with lubricator of about 0.05% in weight percentage by powder blender. The mixture undergoes target type jet mill pulverization afterwards, wherein pulverizing pressure is about 0.7 MPa. Jet steam nozzle and target are silicon nitride de Laval nozzle, where m equals 1 in the function involving the diameter of the target, diameter of the side nozzle and the distance between the target and the nozzle. Velocity of the jet stream is about 450 m/s from the nozzle. In the meantime, a ceramic classifier is selected wherein p=6 in the equation involving the diameter of the classifier and of the target. The produced pulverized powder consists of desired micronized powder which takes about 99.5% in total mass and ultrafine powder which takes about 0.5% in total mass with no residual material in the grinding chamber. The micronized powder is mixed with antioxidant of about 0.3 wt % by powder blender and pressed into a die under an aligning field with strength greater than about 1.4 T. The die is sintered in a vacuum furnace at 1050 degrees Celsius for about 4 hours, and two tempering treatment for about 2 hours at about 920 degree Celsius and for about 3 hours at about 480 degree Celsius respectively to form Neodymium magnets.

Comparative Example 5

(44) The process described above in example 5 is repeated, wherein identical Neodymium alloy strip is prepared and processed through HD to form coarse powder. The coarse powder then undergoes fluidized bed jet mil pulverization instead of target type jet mill pulverization in example 5 to form Neodymium magnets. The following pressing and sintering processes share the same parameter settings as those in example 5. TABLE 5 shows preparation methods, powder specifications and magnetic performances of Neodymium magnetics formed in example 5 and comparative example 5.

(45) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 COMPARISON OF PREPARATION METHODS, POWDER SPECIFICATIONS AND MAGNETIC PERFORMANCES BETWEEN EXAMPLE 5 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5 N.sub.2 Yield Conc. B.sub.r H.sub.cJ (BH).sub.max Method Rate (ppm) D.sub.50 (um) D.sub.90/D.sub.10 (kGs) (kOe) H.sub.k/H.sub.cj (MGsOe) Exmp. 5 99.5% 179 3.67 3.92 13.22 20.76 0.97 42.26 Comp. 97.5% 575 4.56 5.42 13.21 18.26 0.93 41.88 Exmp. 5

(46) According to TABLE 5, the yield rate of Neodymium magnetic material manufacturing in example 5 is greater than that of comparative example 5. The micronized powder prepared in example 5 has lower nitrogen concentration, lower dispersion in particle size distribution and better performances in coercivity and squareness in sintered magnets. Therefore, target type jet mill pulverization method in example 5 not only increases yield rate in micronized powder production but produces magnets of better coercivity and squareness with such micronized powder as raw material.

(47) Meanwhile, a comparison was made between particles produced by target type jet mill pulverization and fluidized bed jet mill pulverization. Statistical analysis was performed for 500 particles in each sample. The results show, in example 5, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 91.6% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 94.3%; whereas in comparative example 5, particles with little or no adhesion takes about 70.9% of total number of particles, wherein the sphericity is approximately 80.3%.

(48) According to the examples of implementing target type jet mill pulverization and comparative examples of implementing fluidized bed jet mill pulverization listed above, it can be concluded that the micronized sintered Neodymium magnetic material powder claimed in the current invention has greater sphericity and smaller particle adhesion rate. The micronized powder has lower nitrogen concentration, even particle-size distribution with low dispersion. The claimed method produces little or no material residual. The sintered Neodymium magnetic material produced by the claimed micronized powder exhibits better coercivity and squareness.

(49) It should be noted that the embodiments listed above are merely illustrative examples of the current invention not limitation of its application. The current invention could be changed or modified in other forms for technician in the field. There is no need and no possibility to list the embodiment exhaustively. Therefore, obvious changes and modification based upon the current invention are still under the protection of the current invention.