Increase of the compressibility of a bumper beam
10017141 ยท 2018-07-10
Assignee
Inventors
- STEPHANE GINJA (Amberieu En Bugey, FR)
- Frederic Pierrot (Amberieu en Bugey, FR)
- Aurelien Seguela (Ruy, FR)
Cpc classification
B60R19/18
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60R2019/1853
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
The bumper beam of a motor vehicle comprising a chassis and comprising at least one horizontal flank and at least one vertical flank extending longitudinally to the beam comprises at least one bearing member arranged so as to be supported on the chassis and to exert a reaction force in one direction on said at least one horizontal flank during the absorption of an impact by said beam, said bearing member being stronger than said at least one horizontal flank in the direction of the reaction force.
Claims
1. A bumper beam of a motor vehicle, the bumper beam comprising: a chassis, at least one horizontal flank and at least one vertical flank extending longitudinally to the beam, at least one bearing member configured to be supported on the chassis and to exert a reaction force in one direction on said at least one horizontal flank during absorption of an impact by said beam, the at least one bearing member including a blade, said at least one bearing member being stronger than said at least one horizontal flank in the direction of the reaction force, and the at least one horizontal flank being configured to be broken by the blade upon the impact.
2. The bumper beam according to claim 1, wherein the beam has a W-shaped profile and includes four horizontal flanks and three vertical flanks.
3. The bumper beam according to claim 1, wherein the beam comprises unidirectional fibres.
4. The bumper beam according to claim 1, further comprising bidirectional or multiaxial reinforcements in at least some of its vertical flanks, the bidirectional or multiaxial reinforcements being selected from ribbon, fabric, non-woven, and mat.
5. The bumper beam according to claim 1, wherein the at least one bearing member comprises a portion of an absorber configured to be supported on the chassis.
6. Beam according to claim 5, wherein the portion of the absorber is one side of the absorber.
7. The bumper beam according to claim 5, wherein the blade is fastened to the beam and to the portion of the absorber.
8. The bumper beam according claim 7, wherein the blade has generally a square shape.
9. Beam according to claim 5, wherein the at least one bearing member comprises a vertical flank of the beam.
10. Beam according to claim 7, wherein the at least one bearing member comprises several blades.
11. The bumper beam of claim 1, wherein: the at least one horizontal flank comprises two adjacent horizontal flanks; and the two adjacent horizontal flanks are configured to be broken by the blade upon the impact.
Description
(1) The invention will be better understood on reading the accompanying figures, which are given solely by way of example and not limiting in any way, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6) In the following description, we use a motor vehicle coordinate system R(O, x, y, z), wherein O is the central point of the volume defined by the vehicle, axis (Ox) corresponds to the main vehicle axis and to the X direction, axis (Oy) corresponds to the horizontal direction perpendicular to the main vehicle axis and to the Y direction, and axis (Oz) is the vertical of the location and corresponds to the Z direction.
(7) For clarity,
(8) Referring to
(9) As an example of embodiment, this type of beam can be produced using a pultrusion process. The horizontal flanks may have in their thickness carbon fibers representing a thickness of 2 mm, i.e. 2.10 m.sup.3, taken between two layers of glass fibers of thickness 1 mm, i.e. 1.10.sup.3 m. The vertical flanks may have in their thickness carbon fibers representing a thickness of 1.4 mm, i.e. 1.4.10 m.sup.3, sandwiched between two layers of glass fibers representing a thickness of 0.4 mm, i.e. 4.10.sup.4 m, these three fibre layers being sandwiched between two tape layers each having a thickness of 0.4 mm, i.e. 4.10.sup.4 m.
(10) The bumper is also provided with an absorber 12 attached to a side member (not shown) of the vehicle by attachment means 18, the side member itself being attached to the vehicle chassis, not shown here. The absorber is designed to absorb as much of the mechanical energy generated by an impact as possible, in order to deform the chassis as little as possible. The absorber is overmoulded on one end of the beam 2. Furthermore, a blade 14 having generally the shape of a square is fastened directly firstly to one side 13 of the absorber and secondly to a specific flank 16 amongst the vertical flanks of the beam. The blade 14 extends substantially in a plane perpendicular to the Z direction and has a small thickness, for example less than 1 cm. This type of configuration firstly allows the beam to be supported indirectly on the chassis, and secondly allows the blade to help absorb an impact. The side 13, the blade 14 and the flank 16 form a bearing member 10.
(11) It is considered that the bumper is subjected to a shock with partial front impact (i.e. offset to one side) on its left side.
(12)
(13) A key feature of the bumper is the maximum force to which it is subjected during absorption of the impact. We see that the value of this maximum force is reached firstly at a displacement of about 215 mm, i.e. 2.15.10.sup.1 m, and secondly that it is different depending on whether or not the beam breaks. Curve 20 shows that it is about 1.5.10.sup.5 N if the horizontal flanks do not break, and curve 22 that is about 1.4.10.sup.5 N if the bearing member breaks the two horizontal flanks adjacent thereto. This represents a difference of 1.10.sup.4 N between the two cases, which is not negligible. If the beam breaks locally, less force is transmitted to the chassis, which is therefore deformed much less, and to the passenger compartment housing the driver and any passengers.
(14) Obviously, numerous modifications can be made without leaving the scope of the invention.
(15) The beam profile may be different from that described above.
(16) The various flanks may include materials other than those described above. In particular, the horizontal flanks may comprise bidirectional reinforcements, but fewer than the vertical flanks so that the latter remain stronger than the horizontal flanks in the direction of the force applied during an impact.
(17) The thicknesses and distribution of the thicknesses in the flanks may be different from those described above.
(18) The blade can be replaced by a plurality of blades and these blades may be supported directly on the horizontal flanks to be broken.
(19) The absorber may be fastened to the chassis.