Magnet track for a transport device
10017333 ยท 2018-07-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H02K2213/12
ELECTRICITY
B65G21/2018
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B65G54/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B65G35/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B65G21/20
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A magnet track for a transport device for moving an armature along the magnet track includes a plurality of linear sections each having an even number of magnets of alternating polarity disposed on a support. In curved regions of the magnet track, the polarity of two adjacent magnets of different sections is the same. A ferromagnetic spacer disposed in each V-shaped gap in the curved regions of the magnet track between the different sections so as to fill the gap.
Claims
1. A magnet track for a transport device for moving an armature along the magnet track, the magnet track comprising: a plurality of linear sections each having an even number of magnets of alternating polarity disposed on a support, wherein, in curved regions of the magnet track, the polarity of two adjacent magnets of different sections is the same and there are a plurality of V-shaped gaps between the linear sections; and a ferromagnetic spacer which is not a magnet disposed in each of the V-shaped gaps in the curved regions of the magnet track between the linear sections so as to fill the respective V-shaped gaps.
2. The magnet track as recited in claim 1, wherein the spacers include a V-shaped ferromagnetic base plate and a ferromagnetic tooth disposed thereon.
3. The magnet track as recited in claim 2, wherein a thickness of the base plate in a direction perpendicular to a plane of the magnet track corresponds to a thickness of the support.
4. The magnet track as recited in claim 2, wherein a thickness of the tooth in a direction perpendicular to a plane of the magnet track corresponds to a thickness of the magnets.
5. The magnet track as recited in claim 2, wherein a length of the tooth in a first direction that is transverse to a direction of the magnet track is greater than a length of the magnets in the first direction.
6. The magnet track as recited in claim 2, wherein the tooth is bounded laterally and transversely to a direction of the magnet track by a curved shape.
7. The magnet track as recited in claim 1, wherein the linear sections are identical to each other and the spacers are identical to each other.
8. The magnet track as recited in claim 1, wherein, in linear regions of the magnet track, the polarity of adjacent magnets reverses at regular intervals across abutting sections.
9. A transport device having a linear drive, comprising: a magnet track comprising: a plurality of linear sections each having an even number of magnets of alternating polarity disposed on a support, wherein, in curved regions of the magnet track, the polarity of two adjacent magnets of different sections is the same and there are a plurality of V-shaped gaps between the linear sections; and a ferromagnetic spacer which is not a magnet disposed in each of the V-shaped gaps in the curved regions of the magnet track between the linear sections so as to fill the respective V-shaped gaps, wherein the linear sections and the spacers form a secondary element of the linear drive.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The present invention will be described in even greater detail below based on the exemplary figures. The invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments. All features described and/or illustrated herein can be used alone or combined in different combinations in embodiments of the invention. The features and advantages of various embodiments of the present invention will become apparent by reading the following detailed description with reference to the attached drawings which illustrate the following:
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4) In an embodiment, the present invention reduces the increased cogging forces in the curved regions of a magnet track in the simplest possible manner without sacrificing the advantages provided by using linear sections of a magnet track also in curved regions.
(5) According to an embodiment, a magnet track for a transport device for moving an armature along the magnet track includes a plurality of linear sections, each having an even number of magnets of alternating polarity disposed on a support. In curved regions of the magnet track, the polarity of two adjacent magnets of different sections is the same, and the V-shaped gaps between the linear sections are filled with ferromagnetic spacers. These spacers carry ferromagnetic teeth and are optimized in shape to reduce cogging forces.
(6) By optimizing the shape of the spacers, it is possible to significantly reduce the disturbance of the periodic arrangement of the magnets, which results from disposing linear sections along curved paths, and also to significantly reduce the additional cogging force resulting therefrom. A base plate of such a spacer and the tooth disposed thereon correspond dimensionally substantially to the linear sections of the magnet track, so that an armature can be moved across the spacers without difficulty. However, the geometry of the tooth can be additionally optimized by various measures for most effective reduction of the cogging force, as will be illustrated below in the description of a specific embodiment.
(7) While the additionally required ferromagnetic spacers entail a certain additional outlay, they can be manufactured from one piece in a relatively simple and cost-effective manner.
(8)
(9) Linear regions of magnet track B can be implemented by sections A abutting end-to-end in flush relationship, while in the curved regions, sections A are arranged at a certain distance from and a certain angle relative to each other. The above-mentioned EP 2930830 A1 describes in detail how this distance should be selected as a function of the desired path radius in order to minimize the additional cogging forces associated with this distance. This prior art forms the basis for the improvements provided by the present invention. The advantageous embodiments described therein with respect to the arrangement of the magnets-carrying sections are also applicable in the context of the present invention.
(10) The deviation from the regular arrangement of magnets M in curved regions of magnet track B inevitably results in increased cogging forces. Therefore, it is proposed that the V-shaped gaps between linear sections A in the curved regions of magnet track B be filled with ferromagnetic spacers D.
(11) These spacers D have a ferromagnetic base plate G, which is also V-shaped and fills the V-shaped gap between sections A. The angle between the edges of base plate G, which extend in a V-shape, must be matched to the particular radius of curvature of magnet track B.
(12) Base plate G further has a ferromagnetic tooth Z disposed thereon. The magnets M located on both sides of this tooth Z and forming part of the adjacent sections A have the same polarity (in
(13) The thickness of base plate Gin a direction perpendicular to the plane of magnet track B corresponds to the thickness of supports T of sections A, so that there will be no salient edges at the transitions between sections A and spacers D. The same applies to the length of the abutting edges of sections A and spacers D transverse to the track direction. This measure also makes it possible to use the same fastening technique for spacers D as for linear sections A, which may be secured, for example, by screws or brackets to the respective underlying surface.
(14) Teeth Z have the same thickness as magnets M in a direction perpendicular to the plane of track B, so that an armature can be moved across these spacers D without difficulty. However, the height of tooth Z may also be optimized within certain limits for most effective reduction of the cogging forces.
(15) Apart from that, teeth Z, however, differ from the geometry of magnets M. The length L of teeth Z transverse to the track direction is greater than the corresponding length of magnets M. Moreover, teeth Z are not bounded by straight edges laterally and transversely to the track direction, but preferably by curved shapes, such as, for example, radii R, which also contributes to a certain smoothing of the cogging forces. In addition, the boundary edge of a tooth Z that is located near the outer boundary of curved path B has a length W1 which is greater than the length W2 of the edge located near the inner boundary of curved path B. Thus, tooth Z makes better use of the available space. The position of tooth Z transverse to the track direction, symbolized by the distance pos in
(16) Parameters L, R, pos, W1 and W2 can be optimized for the radius of curvature of a magnet track B by means of, for example, a simulation calculation of the cogging forces of an armature, and in such a way that the cogging forces generated by the gaps between sections A are minimized. A starting point for, or an example of, such a simulation result or optimized shape can be gathered from
(17) Suitable materials for spacers D include any ferromagnetic materials, such as, for example, iron, unalloyed constructional steel, material no. 1.0037, or highly corrosion-resistant inox steel, material no. 1.4104.
(18) The use of spacers D makes it possible to produce magnet tracks B having curved and straight regions, as well as circular paths or circular segments.
(19) While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. It will be understood that changes and modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill within the scope of the following claims. In particular, the present invention covers further embodiments with any combination of features from different embodiments described above and below. Additionally, statements made herein characterizing the invention refer to an embodiment of the invention and not necessarily all embodiments.
(20) The terms used in the claims should be construed to have the broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the foregoing description. For example, the use of the article a or the in introducing an element should not be interpreted as being exclusive of a plurality of elements. Likewise, the recitation of or should be interpreted as being inclusive, such that the recitation of A or B is not exclusive of A and B, unless it is clear from the context or the foregoing description that only one of A and B is intended. Further, the recitation of at least one of A, B and C should be interpreted as one or more of a group of elements consisting of A, B and C, and should not be interpreted as requiring at least one of each of the listed elements A, B and C, regardless of whether A, B and C are related as categories or otherwise. Moreover, the recitation of A, B and/or C or at least one of A, B or C should be interpreted as including any singular entity from the listed elements, e.g., A, any subset from the listed elements, e.g., A and B, or the entire list of elements A, B and C.