Traction winch
10017364 · 2018-07-10
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B66D1/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/7405
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B66D1/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/14
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D1/30
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B66D5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A traction winch for winching an elongated article having a high-tension end connectable to a load and low-tension end connectable to a storage device includes two or more rotatable drums arranged adjacent to each other with their rotational axes substantially parallel, each of them having a plurality of parallel, circumferential sheaves with groove, the sheaves being axially offset with respect to each other to allow wrapping of the elongated article around the sheaves of both drums in a spiral fashion. The sheaves includes fixed sheaves, stationary relative to their underlying drum, and rotatable sheaves, rotatable relative to their underlying drum. The majority of the rotatable sheaves of at least one of the drums is arranged adjacent to each other on a high load supporting side of the winch and the rotational velocity of at least one of the rotatable sheaves is reducible by means of at least one braking device.
Claims
1. A traction winch for winching an elongated article having a high-tension end connectable to a load and a low-tension end connectable to a storage device, the traction winch comprising: two or more rotatable drums arranged adjacent to each other with rotational axes of the two or more rotatable drums substantially parallel, wherein each of the two or more rotatable drums have a plurality of parallel, circumferential sheaves with a groove, the sheaves being axially offset with respect to each other to allow wrapping of the elongated article around the sheaves of both drums in a spiral fashion, wherein the plurality of sheaves comprises: fixed sheaves that are stationary relative to one of the two or more rotatable drums; and rotatable sheaves that are rotatable relative to one of the two or more rotatable drums, wherein a majority of the rotatable sheaves of at least one of the the two or more rotatable drums are arranged adjacent to each other on the high-tension end of the traction winch, wherein a rotational velocity of at least one of the rotatable sheaves is reducible by means of at least one braking device, and wherein the at least one braking device brakes the at least one of the rotatable sheaves by exerting a pressure towards the underside of the at least one of the rotatable sheaves, the pressure being sufficient to reduce the rotational velocity of the at least one of the rotational sheaves.
2. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein, for each of the rotatable sheaves, an inner surface of each of the rotatable sheaves that contacts one of the two or more rotatable drums is configured to ensure a frictional resistance being less than a resulting frictional resistance set up between an outer surface of each of the rotatable sheaves and a contacting surface of the elongated article during operation.
3. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein at least two of the rotatable sheaves are rotatable independently of each other.
4. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the rotatable sheaves is lockable to one of the two or more rotatable drums by means of at least one of the at least one braking device.
5. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein any reduction in rotational velocity results from induced friction increase between the at least one of the rotatable sheaves and one of the two or more rotatable drums.
6. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein, with reference to the high-tension end, a rotational velocity of a second rotatable sheave receiving the elongated article (16) during operation is reducible relative to one of the two or more rotatable drums by means of at least one of the at least one braking device.
7. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein, with reference to the high-tension end, a diameter of at least a first rotatable sheave, a second rotatable sheave, a third rotatable sheave, a fourth rotatable sheave, and a fifth rotatable sheave receiving the elongated article during operation is gradually reduced towards the low-tension end.
8. The traction winch according to claim 7, wherein a diameter of a majority of remaining rotatable sheaves are equal, or gradually reduced to a smaller extent compared to the diameter reduction of at least the first, second and third sheave (4-6), up to the fifth sheave (8), towards the low load supporting side.
9. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein, with reference to the high-tension end, at least one of the sheaves arranged at or near the low-tension end has a diameter that is equal or approximately equal to a diameter of a first sheave.
10. The traction winch according to claim 9, wherein among the sheaves arranged at or near the low-tension end, the at least one of the sheaves having the diameter equal or approximately equal to the diameter of the first sheave is rotatable.
11. The traction winch according to claim 10, wherein the rotational velocity of the at least one rotatable sheave having a diameter equal or approximately equal to the diameter of the first sheave is reducible relative to one of the two or more rotatable drums by means of at least one of the at least one braking device.
12. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein the traction winch further includes biasing means, the biasing means comprising: at least one roller, means for moving the at least one roller into engagement with the elongated article on the low-tension end of the winch during operation, and means for maintaining the at least one roller into engagement with the elongated article during operation such that a predetermined back tension is ensured on the elongated article.
13. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein the traction winch further includes drive means for rotating the two or more rotatable drums, the drive means comprising: a common shaft in gripping arrangement with the two or more rotatable drums; and a motor for transmitting a rotational force to the common shaft.
14. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein the gripping arrangement is enabled by gear wheels situated on the two or more rotatable drums.
15. A method for hoisting an elongated article onto a traction winch, the method comprising: providing a traction winch according to claim 1; guiding the elongated article in a spiral fashion along the sheaves of the traction winch; with reference to an axial end, decelerating the rotational velocity of one of at least a first rotatable sheave, a second rotatable sheave, a third rotatable sheave, a fourth rotatable sheave, and a fifth rotatable sheave, to one of the two or more rotatable drums by at least one of the at least one braking device in the case of hoisting an elongated article with a Young's modulus less than 10 GPa; and releasing or keeping released the at least one braking device applied to at least one of the first rotatable sheave, the second rotatable sheave, the third rotatable sheave, the fourth rotatable sheave, and the fifth rotatable sheave, in the case of hoisting an elongated article with a Young's modulus higher than, or equal to, 10 GPa.
16. The traction winch according to claim 1, wherein the at least one braking device reduces rotational velocity of the rotatable sheaves by at least: inducing friction increase between at least one of the rotatable sheaves and one of the two or more rotatable drums by direct pressure.
Description
SHORT SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(6)
(7) As mentioned above, almost all the force transmission capacity between the rope 16 and the groove in the second sheave 5 shall ideally be applied to lower the tensioning of the rope 16 so that an insignificant amount of tensioning remains when the wrapping of the rope 16 continues to the third sheave 6. When the tensioning is reduced, the elongation of the rope 16 is reduced correspondingly, resulting in that the amount of rope 16 per time unit which enters the second sheave 5 is larger than the amount of rope 16 per time unit which leaves the same sheave 5.
(8) The first sheave 4 is acting primarily as a guide disk for the rope 16. The sheave diameter is preferably larger than any of the other sheaves 5-15 in order to ensure that the rope 16 is not skidding on the first sheave 4. Such a skidding would increase the tensioning transmitted to the subsequent second sheave 5. A larger sheave diameter also increases the contact surface between the rope 16 and the sheave's groove, thereby contributing to a tensioning reduction. The ratio of the sheave diameters between the first sheave 4 and the second sheave 5 is chosen in order that as much as possible of the load capacity entering the first sheave 4 is exploited. Such an optimization is particularly important when ropes with low Young's modulus are winched.
(9) The main task of the second sheave 5 is to quickly reduce the rope tensioning, especially when ropes having low Young's modulus enters the winch 1, i.e. ropes exhibiting a relatively large elongation when subjected to a load. This second sheave 5 is configured to slide on the underlying second drum 3, for example via one or more journal bearings 19. The size of the contact surfaces between the shown bearing(s) 19 and the second drum 3, as well as the bearing material's overall friction coefficient towards its underlying drum surface, are selected to ensure that the overall bearing's frictional resistance remains smaller than the resulting gliding resistance established by the overall frictional coefficient between the groove surface of the second sheave 5 and the rope 16. If this has not been the case, an undesired gliding of the rope 16 relative to the second sheave's groove would have started prior to any rotation of the sheave 5. The ratio between the two gliding resistances is normally independent of any variations in the load. The arrangement allows transmission of the force from the second drum 3 to the rope 16 without risking significant skidding of the rope 16, an effect which is of particular importance at the high load side 17,17 of the winch 1 in which the load is relatively high compared to the low load side 18,18, and where the risk for damages on the rope 16 itself and its surroundings are highest. In addition to being rotational, the second (rotational) sheave 5 is also distinctive in including a first braking device 20 that may brake, or even lock, the sheave 5 relative to its underlying second drum 3 when appropriate, thereby effectively reconfiguring the traction winch 1 during or outside operation. This first braking device 20 brakes or locks the sheave by for example exerting a pressure towards the underside of the rotatable sheave 5, which pressure being sufficient to stop or at least significantly reduce the rotational velocity of the sheave. The pressure may be enforced by any known means, for example by use of a hydraulic cylinder. Note that the number of sheaves in
(10) The subsequent third sheave 6 arranged on the first drum 2 is preferably also supported on one or more journal bearings 19 in the same way as for the second sheave 5 allowing the third sheave 6 to perform axial rotations relative to the underling first drum 2. It may also be provided with a second braking device (not shown), or alternatively apply the first braking device 20, in order to brake or lock the sheave 6 relative to the first drum 2. As for the relation between the sheave diameters of the first 4 and second 5 sheaves the third sheave 6 has preferably a diameter that is smaller than the diameter of the second sheave 5 in order to ensure that most of the load capacity entering the first sheave 4 is exploited, in particular when ropes with low Young's modulus is winched.
(11) Even if the first sheave 4 is acting primarily as a guide disk it may also be provided with one or more journal bearings 19 slidable on the first drum 2, thereby contributing in transmitting force between the first drum 2 and the contacting surface of the rope 16. If the first sheave 4 is rotatable its bearing(s) 19 are preferably constructed in accordance with the same principles as for the above disclosed bearings.
(12) At low loads any significant reduction in sheave diameters is not strictly necessary with when going from the high load side 17,17 towards the low load side 18,18, even during winching of ropes having low Young's modulus. In this case the geometry of the diameter reduction from first 4 to second, third (or higher order) sheaves is too big compared to the ideal diameter reduction. This non-ideal configuration results in a continuous skidding in order to equalize the amount of rope per time unit entering and exiting these particular sheaves 4,5,6. However, such skidding is not considered to be of any major significance since it takes place between the contacting surfaces of the journal bearings 19 and their underlying drums 2,3. Furthermore, any excessive heating at these contacting surfaces are not likely since the velocity would be relatively low. However, if this scenario turns out to be incorrect, arranging a suitable cooling system may be advisable. In any case, the desired geometry of the sheaves 4-15 is that which contribute to the highest load reduction of the rope when guided from sheave to sheave.
(13) In
(14) At least some of the low load sheaves 7-12,14-15 have preferably a gradual diameter reduction that is adapted for a rope with high Young's modulus. The reason for this is two-fold: due to the particular configuration of at least some of the rotational sheaves 4-6 on the high load side 17,17, for example by the second sheave 5, a significant part of the rope tensioning has already been removed when the first low load sheaves 7 is reached, and the primarily function of the inventive winch 1 is to perform winching of high yield polyethylene ropes having a stiffness (around 35-45 GPa) that is significantly higher than for example a traditional polypropylene hawser (1-1.4 GPa), thus requiring less elongation/contraction compensation.
(15) When a rope with low Young's modulus is winched onto or out of the traction winch 1, and the sheave rotation reaches a predetermined value, the second sheave 5 (and alternatively one or more of the other sheaves equipped with a braking device 20) is decelerated or locked relative to the underlying drum 3. If this takes place, and if the diameter down-scaling between the rotatable high load sheaves 4-6, for example the first and second sheaves 4,5, the second and third sheaves 5,6 and the third 6 and first 7 of the low load sheaves 7-12,14-15, are adapted to a rope 16 with low Young's modulus, the capacity of the winch 1 to transmit force between the sheaves 4-15 and the rope 16 is exploited in a more optimum manner, causing a more rapid reduction in tensioning. The tensioning of the rope 16 entering the fixed low load sheaves 7-12,14-15 exhibiting the above mentioned high Young's modulus diameter scale-down will be higher than the optimum tensioning. This would result in a point of equilibrium somewhere at the low load side 18,18 of the drums 2,3, causing a continuous gliding between the sheaves and the drums at the low load side of this point. However, this is not considered critical since the load is low compared to the high load side of the winch 1.
(16) In the other hand, when a rope with high Young's modulus is winched onto or out of the traction winch 1, the diameter scale-down of the rotatable high load sheaves 4-6 would be larger than the ideal diameter scale-down. This scale-down misfit is almost independent of the load on the rope. The result is a continuous, or almost continuous, skidding in order to compensate the excessive amount of rope per time unit fed to the subsequent sheave. Again, such skidding is considered quite harmless since it occurs at relatively low velocities between the contacting surfaces of the journal bearings 19 and the underlying drum 2,3. But in certain situations it may be advantageous to install an appropriate cooling system on the winch 1 to dissipate any frictional heat that may arise. In the situation with rope having high Young's modulus all of the high load sheaves 4-6 may be allowed to rotate, i.e. with the braking device(s) 20 disengaged. The diameter scale-down of the fixed low load side sheaves 7-12,14-15 is chosen based on the Young's modulus of the rope and a given normal load. The latter would necessarily be a compromise, but as emphasized above, the rope 16 winded around the rotatable high load sheaves 4-6 are well protected from wear since most or all of the skidding takes place between the contacting surface of the journal bearings 19 and the underlying drum 2,3. And since the Young's modulus is high there will be very little tensioning variations, causing skidding with relatively low velocities between the rope 16 and the fixed sheaves 7-12,14-15.
(17) Irrespective of the Young's modulus of the rope 16 the winching onto a traction winch 1 faces a challenge when operating ropes of long length at low loads (slack rope heave) since there would be a significant risk of rope congestion on the winch 1 caused by the significantly larger sheaves encountered by the rope prior to entering the grooves of a cooperative storage winch (not shown). This problem is well known, and earlier attempts to find working solutions have been to replace the last sheave on the low load side of the winch 1 with a sheave having a diameter similar to the diameter of the first high load sheave 4, commonly referred to as a slack rope heave sheave/groove. The purpose of this particular arrangement is to ensure that the end low load sheave receiving the rope from the storage winch is capable of guiding the rope through the traction winch 1 with a velocity that prevents the above mentioned rope congestion further towards the high load side. However, the problem with this prior art solution is that a continuous skidding of the slack rope heave sheave will take place at high velocity when the load is increased. Furthermore, this sheave/groove will increase the risk for unfavourable skidding, thus reducing the force transmission capacity during winching of ropes as explained above. In order to overcome this problem it is considered advantageous to let one of the last sheaves 13 on the high load side 18,18 of one of the drums 2,3 to be both rotational/skidable and brakeable/lockable in the same manner as explained for the high load side sheaves 4-6. When a slack rope heave operation is performed this slack rope heave sheave 13 is kept locked (or with reduced rotational velocity) until a certain predetermined minimum limit of the load is reached, and thereby to obtain the same advantageous as the prior art solution. This limit may of course vary for ropes with low and high Young's modulus. However, above this limit, for example during rope lowering, the slack rope heave sheave 13 is kept rotatable. In this way the skidding is moved from the contact surfaces between the rope 16 and the sheave grooves 4-15 to the contact surfaces between the journal bearings 19 and the underlying drum 2,3.
(18)
(19)