Method and apparatus for eliminating crosstalk amount included in an output signal

Abstract

An image system is provided. The system comprises: a pixel unit configured to have a plurality of pixels, each of the plurality of pixels including at least a white pixel; a crosstalk amount calculating unit configured to calculate an evaluation value of crosstalk amount included in an output signal from a pixel to be corrected in the pixel unit; a crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit configured to calculate a crosstalk correction coefficient based on the evaluation value output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit; and a crosstalk correcting unit configured to eliminate crosstalk amount included in the output signal of the pixel to be corrected, using the crosstalk correction coefficient.

Claims

1. An image system, comprising: a pixel unit configured to have a plurality of pixels, each of the plurality of pixels including at least a white pixel; a crosstalk amount calculating unit configured to calculate an evaluation value of crosstalk amount included in an output signal from a pixel to be corrected in the pixel unit; a crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit configured to calculate a crosstalk correction coefficient based on the evaluation value output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit; and a crosstalk correcting unit configured to eliminate crosstalk amount included in an output signal of the pixel to be corrected, using the crosstalk correction coefficient.

2. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the crosstalk correcting unit is further configured to subtract, from the output signal of the pixel to be corrected, a value obtained by multiplying an output signal of a pixel adjacent to the pixel to be corrected with the crosstalk correction coefficient, to eliminate the crosstalk amount.

3. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the crosstalk correcting unit is further configured to calculate a value by using the plurality of pixels excluding the white pixels.

4. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the crosstalk amount calculating unit is further configured to calculate the evaluation value of crosstalk amount included in the output signal of the pixel to be corrected, based on a relation of output signals between adjacent pixels.

5. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the pixel unit is further configured to use color coding including white pixels.

6. The image system according to claim 5, wherein the crosstalk amount calculating unit is further configured to calculate the evaluation value of crosstalk amount included in the output signal of the pixel to be corrected, based on a proportion of a sum of signal amount of the pixels other than the white pixels, as to signal amount of the white pixels.

7. The image system according to claim 5, wherein the crosstalk amount calculating unit is further configured to calculate an evaluation value for a relative amount of crosstalk included in the output signal of the pixel to be corrected, based on a proportion of a sum of values obtained by multiplying signal amount of each of the RGB pixels by respective predetermined coefficients (?, ?, ?), as to a value obtained by multiplying signal amount of the white pixels by a predetermined coefficient (?).

8. The image system according to claim 5, wherein the crosstalk amount calculating unit is further configured to calculate an evaluation value of crosstalk amount, with N?N pixels as an increment of processing (where N is a positive integer).

9. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit is further configured to calculate beforehand a relational expression between the evaluation value of crosstalk amount calculated by the crosstalk amount calculating unit, and correction coefficients to be calculated; and, at a time of an evaluation value output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit being output, to reference the relational expression and to calculate a correction coefficient corresponding to the evaluation value output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit.

10. The image system according to claim 1, wherein the crosstalk amount calculating unit is further configured to use each of the plurality of pixels for calculating the evaluation values of crosstalk amount occurring at relevant positions; and wherein the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit is further configured to calculate the crosstalk correction coefficient based on the evaluation value output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit, for each position where the pixels for calculating evaluation values is disposed; and wherein the crosstalk correcting unit is further configured to perform correction of crosstalk using a relevant coefficient, within the pixels for calculating evaluation values, and to perform correction of crosstalk using the crosstalk correction coefficient determined based on the evaluation value of crosstalk amount obtained from neighboring pixels for calculating evaluation values.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically illustrating the hardware configuration of an imaging apparatus 100 serving as an embodiment of the present invention.

(2) FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a functional configuration for performing image signal processing for crosstalk correction.

(3) FIG. 3A is a diagram illustrating an example of spectral properties of an imaging device 12 for each color pixel (degree of crosstalk small) (spectral properties

(4) FIG. 3B is a diagram illustrating an example of spectral properties of the imaging device 12 for each color pixel (degree of crosstalk medium) (spectral properties 2).

(5) FIG. 3C is a diagram illustrating an example of spectral properties of the imaging device 12 for each color pixel (degree of crosstalk great) (spectral properties 3).

(6) FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating the way in which crosstalk occurs from the vertical direction and horizontal direction.

(7) FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating the way in which white signals mix into adjacent RGB signals in the color pixel array shown in FIG. 12B.

(8) FIG. 4C is a diagram illustrating the way in which RGB signals mix into adjacent white signals in the color pixel array shown in FIG. 12B.

(9) FIG. 5A is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a blue patch (patch No. 13) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(10) FIG. 5B is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a green patch (patch No. 14) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(11) FIG. 5C is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a red patch (patch No. 15) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(12) FIG. 5D is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a yellow patch (patch No. 16) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(13) FIG. 5E is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a magenta patch (patch No. 17) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(14) FIG. 5F is a diagram illustrating reflectance spectral properties of a cyan patch (patch No. 18) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart.

(15) FIG. 6A is a diagram illustrating the results of integrating the reflectance spectral properties of each Macbeth color path shown in Fig. SA through Fig. SF with spectral properties corresponding to the crosstalk amount for each color pixel of the imaging device 12 shown in FIG. 3A (spectral properties 1).

(16) FIG. 6B is a diagram illustrating the results of integrating the reflectance spectral properties of each Macbeth color path shown in FIG. 5A through FIG. 5F with spectral properties corresponding to the crosstalk amount for each color pixel of the imaging device 12 shown in FIG. 3B (spectral properties 2).

(17) FIG. 6C is a diagram illustrating the results of integrating the reflectance spectral properties of each Macbeth color path shown in FIG. 5A through FIG. 5F with spectral properties corresponding to the crosstalk amount for each color pixel of the imaging device 12 shown in FIG. 3C (spectral properties 3).

(18) FIG. 7A is a diagram illustrating evaluation values obtained for each Macbeth color patch for the primary six colors, with regard to each spectral property according to the crosstalk amount (FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C).

(19) FIG. 7B is a diagram illustrating evaluation values obtained for all Macbeth color patches, with regard to each spectral property according to the crosstalk amount FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C).

(20) FIG. 8 is a diagram for describing a common crosstalk correction processing method.

(21) FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a relational expression between crosstalk amount evaluation values (K) and correction coefficients.

(22) FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a region (block) for calculating correction coefficients with magnitude of a certain degree.

(23) FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating memory 4 for holding the evaluation value (K) calculated at a crosstalk correction calculating unit 1.

(24) FIG. 12A is a diagram illustrating a Bayer array which is a representative filter array for a primary color system.

(25) FIG. 12B is a diagram illustrating an example of a filter array including white pixels.

(26) FIG. 13A is a diagram illustrating another example of a filter array including white pixels.

(27) FIG. 13B is a diagram illustrating another example of a filter array including white pixels.

(28) FIG. 13C is a diagram illustrating another example of a filter array using a complementary color filter.

(29) FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a filter array wherein arrays including white pixels such as shown in FIG. 12B, are scattered throughout a Bayer array not including white pixels (see fog. 12A).

(30) FIG. 15 is a diagram schematically illustrating the way in which multiple evaluation value calculating arrays such as shown in FIG. 12B are disposed on an imaging device face based on the Bayer array shown in FIG. 12A.

(31) FIG. 16 is a diagram schematically illustrating the way in which multiple evaluation value calculating arrays such as shown in FIG. 12B are disposed on an imaging device face based on the Bayer array shown in FIG. 12A.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(32) The following is a detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, with reference to the drawings.

(33) FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the hardware configuration of an imaging apparatus 10 serving as an embodiment of the present invention. Note that imaging apparatus as used here includes imaging devices, camera modules including an optical system for imaging image light on an imaging face (light-receiving face) of the imaging device and a signal processing circuit for the imaging device, camera apparatuses such as digital still cameras and video cameras in which the camera module is implemented, and electronic equipment such as cellular phones.

(34) In FIG. 1, image light from a subject (not shown) is imaged on the imaging face of an imaging device 12 by an optical system, an imaging lens 11 for example. For the imaging device 12, an imaging device is used which is formed by a great number pixels including photoelectric converting devices being arrayed two-dimensionally in matrix fashion, and a color filter including color components of a primary color for creating luminance components, and other color components, are disposed on the surface of the pixels. A color filter is a band-pass filter which passes light of predetermined wavelengths.

(35) The imaging device having a color filter may be any of a charge-transfer imaging device of which a CCD is representative, an X-Y address imaging device of which a MOS is representative, or the like.

(36) Also, the color filter includes green (G) for example as a color components serving as a primary component for creating a luminance (Y) component, and red (R) and blue (B) for example as other color components, respectively, and performs color coding so as to reproduce color of incident light at each pixel position. With the present embodiment, color coding of an array including white pixels is performed for the color filter, in order to realize high sensitivity and so forth. However, the array of pixels is not restricted to that shown in FIG. 12B. Note that an arrangement may be made wherein as color components serving as a primary component for creating the Y component, white, cyan, yellow, or the like are used, and magenta, cyan, yellow, or the like, are used for other color components.

(37) With the imaging device 12, of the incident image light, only light of each color component passes through the color filters and is input to each pixel. The light that has been input to each pixel is subjected to photoelectric conversion by photoelectric converters such as photodiodes. This is then read out from each pixel as analog image signals, converted into digital image signals at an A/D converter (ADC) 13, and input to a camera signal processing circuit 14 which is equivalent to the image processing device according to the present invention.

(38) The camera signal processing circuit 14 is configured of an optical system correcting circuit 21, a WB (white balance) circuit 22, an interpolation processing circuit 23, a gamma (?) correction circuit 24, a Y (brightness) signal processing circuit 25, a C (chroma) signal processing circuit 26, a band limiting LPF (low-pass filter) 27, a thinning out circuit 28, and so forth.

(39) The optical system correcting circuit 21 performs correction of the imaging device 12 and optical system, such as digital clamping to match the black level with the digital image signals input to the camera signal processing circuit 14, defect correction for correcting defects of the imaging device 12, shading correction for correcting light falloff at edges for the imaging lens 11, and so forth.

(40) As described above, the color filter used with the imaging device according to the present embodiment includes white pixels, so the problem of crosstalk becomes pronounced, and accordingly there is the need to perform correction thereof. While the point of performing calculation and correction of crosstalk amount at the stage of digital signal processing is a main feature of the present invention, the function thereof cam be implemented within the optical system correcting circuit 21. Details of calculation and correction of crosstalk amount will be described later.

(41) The WB circuit 22 subjects image signals which have passed through the optical system correcting circuit 21 to processing for adjusting the white balance, such that RGB is the same as to a white subject. The interpolation processing circuit 23 creates pixels with different spatial phases by interpolation, i.e., creates three planes from RGB signals with spatially shifted phases (RGB signals at the same spatial position).

(42) The gamma (?) correction circuit 24 subjects the RGB signals at the same spatial position to gamma correction, and then supplies to the Y-signal processing circuit 25 and C-signal processing circuit 26. Gamma correction is processing for applying a predetermined gain to each of the R, G, and B color signals output from the WB circuit 22, such that the photoelectric conversion properties of the entire system, including the imaging device 12 and downstream image reproducing means and so forth, are 1, so as to correctly express the color tone of the subject.

(43) The Y-signal processing circuit 25 creates brightness (Y) signals from the R, G, and B color signals, and the C-signal processing circuit 26 creates Cr (R?Y) and Cb (B?Y) from the R, G, and B color signals.

(44) The band limiting LPF 27 is a filter wherein the cutoff frequency f.sub.c is ? of the sampling frequency f.sub.s for example, and drops the passing band for color difference signals Cr and Cb from (?) f.sub.s to (?) f.sub.s. However, this is output for TV signal format, and in the event that output is performed without band limitation, frequency signals of ? f.sub.s or higher will be output as false color signals. The thinning out circuit 28 performs thinning out of sampling of the color difference signals Cr and Cb.

(45) With the imaging apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1, the color filter used for the imaging device includes white pixels, so the problem of crosstalk becomes pronounced. The present embodiment is configured that calculation and correction of the crosstalk amount is performed at the stage of digital signals correction. FIG. 2 illustrates the functional configuration for performing image signal processing for crosstalk correction. The image signal processing is configured of a crosstalk amount calculating unit 1, a crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2, and a crosstalk correction unit 3, and is implemented in the optical system correction circuit 21.

(46) The crosstalk amount calculating unit 1 will be described first. The crosstalk amount calculating unit 1 performs quantification of the degree of crosstalk as the crosstalk amount, based on imaged data output from the imaging device 12.

(47) FIG. 3 illustrates examples of spectral properties for each color pixel of the imaging device 12. In the example shown in the drawing, the degree of crosstalk increases in the order of FIG. 3A, FIG. 3B, and FIG. 3C. Blue (B) is a filter which passes around 450 nanometers, Green (G) is a filter which passes around 550 nanometers, and red (R) is a filter which passes around 650 nanometers. Also, white (W) pixels are the same as with a monochrome imaging device with no color filter. When the crosstalk amount increases, the output at frequency regions where there should be no sensitivity increases. For example, in FIG. 3C, the output and the band of 550 to 650 nanometers has increased at the waveform for blue (B_3) pixels, due to crosstalk.

(48) Now, with a color filter array such as shown in FIG. 12B, the white pixels and each of the RGB pixels are next to each other. Generally, with crosstalk, phenomena from the vertical direction and horizontal direction are dominant as shown in FIG. 4B. Crosstalk can be generally divided into two types, i.e., one where white signals are mixed into adjacent RGB signals, as shown in FIG. 4B, and one where RGB signals are mixed into adjacent white signals, as shown in FIG. 4C.

(49) Using the nature shown in FIG. 4 enables the crosstalk amount to be known in a relative manner. The method thereof is to calculate the proportion between the sum of the signal amount of each of the signals, and the signal amount of the white signals (described later).

(50) Now, in the field of color imaging, including digital cameras foremost, generally a Macbeth Color Checker (Macbeth Color chart) is used for evaluating color reproducibility. For example, Color Imaging, edited by the Color Science Association of Japan (pp 29-33) describes that spectral sensitivity, tone reproduction, and the three primary colors are factors governing color reproducibility, and that a method is generally used in which these factors are not separately evaluated in color reproducibility evaluation but rather the color reproducibility finally obtained is evaluated, and that as for the evaluation method, a standard color chart is input as an image and the output reproduced colors are compared with the colors of the original color chart by spectral reflectivity (transmissivity), and that the Macbeth Color chart is widely used as the color chart. A Macbeth Color chart is made up of 24 colors including 6 shades of gray. The surface of each color chart is matte, and is of a size of 45 mm?45 mm. This literature lists the reflective spectral properties (spectral reflectivity) of the Macbeth Color chart as appendix Tables A.1 and A.2. Description will be made below using this spectral data.

(51) FIGS. 5A through 5F illustrate the reflective spectral properties of each patch of blue (patch No. 13), green (patch No. 14), red (patch No. 15), yellow (patch No. 16), magenta {patch No. 17), and cyan (patch No. 18) in the Macbeth Color Checker chart. Note that the reason that only the above six colors of the 24 colors in the Macbeth Color chart are used is due to the fact that these six colors are the primary color components used in many color imaging systems.

(52) Multiplying the reflectance spectral properties of these Macbeth Color charts (FIG. 5A through FIG. 5F) by the spectral properties of the color filters of the imaging device 12 shown in FIGS. 3A through 3C at each wavelength component and obtaining the sum, i.e., integration thereof, represents the output of each floor form the imaging device 12.

(53) FIG. 6A through FIG. 6C illustrate the results of integrating the reflectance spectral properties of each Macbeth color patch shown in FIG. 5A through FIG. 5F with the spectral properties of each color pixel of the imaging device shown in FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C, respectively. Put simply, FIG. 6A through FIG. 6C are equivalent to output corresponding to the crosstalk amount of each color pixel of the imaging device 12.

(54) An evaluation value (K) for evaluation the crosstalk amount can be calculated using the following Expression (1) for example, based on the output (see FIG. 6A through FIG. 6C) for each of the color pixels (R, G, B, W) of the imaging device 12 obtained from the spectral properties (see FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C) according to the crosstalk amount of each color pixel of the imaging device 12.

(55) $\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Mathematical}\mathrm{Expression}1\right]& \\ K=\frac{?R+?G+?B}{\mathrm{.Math.}W}& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

(56) In the above Expression (1), R, G, b, and W are output values of each of the color pixels (see FIG. 6A through 6C) ?, ?, ? and ? are arbitrary coefficients, and the evaluation value (K) is equivalent to the result of calculating the proportion of the sum of output of each of the RGB color pixels as to the output for the white pixels. This expression is based on the fact that with the color coding shown in FIG. 12B for example, crosstalk can be generally divided into two types; one where white signals are mixed into adjacent RGB signals, as shown in FIG. 4B, and one where RGB signals are mixed into adjacent white signals, as shown in FIG. 4C (described above).

(57) Calculation of the evaluation value (K) shown in the above Expression (1) is performed for output according to crosstalk amount of each color pixel of the imaging device 12 (see FIG. 6A through 6C), for each patch of the Macbeth Color chart, whereby an evaluation value can be obtained for each Macbeth color patch, with regard to each spectral property corresponding to crosstalk amount (FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C) can be obtained.

(58) FIG. 7A illustrates evaluation values obtained for each Macbeth color patch, with regard to each spectral property corresponding to crosstalk amount (FIG. 3A through FIG. 3C) Also, the average and standard deviation for the evaluation values K_1, K_2, and K_3 obtained for each of the spectral properties 1 through 3 over all six color patches have been compiled in the following table.

(59) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Average Standard deviation K_1 1.06 0.016 K_2 1.15 0.012 K_3 1.35 0.027

(60) From the above table, it can be seen that the evaluation value (K) is generally constant, regardless of the reflectance properties of the subject (each color). This means that the evaluation value (K) calculated from the above Expression (1) is capable of being used in evaluating crosstalk amount.

(61) Note that the coefficients ?, ?, ? and ? are optimized such that the evaluation value (K) is constant in ideal spectral properties where the crosstalk amount is small, as shown in FIG. 3A, for example. In reality, an approximation method such as least square or the like is used. The obtained value is used as to other spectral properties such as in FIG. 3B and FIG. 3C, as well. In FIG. 7A, the evaluation value (K) has been calculated using the coefficient values shown in the following Expression (2).

(62) [Mathematical Expression 2]
?=?=?=?=1(2)

(63) The reason that only the above six colors of the 24 colors in the Macbeth Color chart are used in the above description is due to the fact that these six colors are the primary color components used in many color imaging systems (described above). The present inventors performed calculation of evaluation values for each of the spectral properties, using the Macbeth Color chart for all 24 colors, for the sake of assurance. FIG. 7B illustrates the results. Also, the average and standard deviation for the evaluation values K_1, K_2, and K_3 obtained for each of the spectral properties 1 through 3 over all 24 color patches have been compiled in the following table. Since the evaluation value (K) is generally constant regardless of the reflectance properties of the subject (each color), it can be reconfirmed that the evaluation value (K) calculated from the above Expression (1) is capable of being used in evaluating crosstalk amount.

(64) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Average Standard deviation K_1 1.07 0.010 K_2 1.16 0.011 K_3 1.35 0.025

(65) With the above description, it can be understood that relative change in crosstalk amount can be detected by calculating the evaluation value (K) using output signals from the imaging device 12 using color cording in which white pixels are added to RGB pixels. That is to say, the degree of crosstalk amount can be detected from the output signals of the imaging device 12 alone, with no need to measure the crosstalk amount within the chip beforehand as has been conventional done (e.g., see PTL 2). Accordingly, the degree of crosstalk can be quantized at the state of digital signal processing, even in a situation wherein optical conditions, such as the lens to be used, are unknown.

(66) With the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1, output signals of pixels of all colors including the white pixels are necessary, as can be understood from the above Expression (1). Accordingly, in the case of calculating the evaluation value (K) in real time as to the imaging device 12 having a filter array such as shown in FIG. 12B, the value of around 4?4 pixels is preferably handled as the minimum increment. Pixels of the same color within a processing increment have two or more outputs, so the average value of signal amount is preferably used to calculate the above Expression (1).

(67) Next, the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2 will be described. At the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2, a crosstalk correction coefficient corresponding to the current crosstalk amount is calculated from the crosstalk amount output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1 and a relational expression between the crosstalk correction coefficient and crosstalk amount obtained beforehand.

(68) First, a general crosstalk correction processing method will be described with reference to FIG. 8. As shown in FIG. 4A, with crosstalk, phenomena from the vertical direction and horizontal direction are dominant. Accordingly, in other words, several tenths of the signals of adjacent pixels vertically and horizontally can be subtracted from the signal of the pixel to be corrected as crosstalk amount. The output signals of a pixel to be corrected can be corrected by the following Expression (3).

(69) [Mathematical Expression 3]
S_crct(i,j)=S(i,j)?a.Math.S(i,j?1)?b.Math.S(i?1,j)?c.Math.S(i+1,j)?S(i,j+1)(3)

(70) In the above Expression (3), S_crct represents the signal after correction, S represents the signal before correction, and in side the parentheses are the coordinate positions, respectively. (i, j) is one coordinates of the pixel to be corrected. Also, a, b, c, and d are correction coefficients as to adjacent pixels above, left, right, and below. These a, b, c, and d are also values indicating the proportion of the adjacent pixel signals being crosstalk amount.

(71) In the event that the crosstalk amount is constant regardless of sheeting conditions or pixel position within the chip, the correction coefficients a, b, c, and d may also be constant. However, in reality, the crosstalk amount changes depending on the color temperature of the light source and optical conditions, and pixel position within the chip. Generally, as the crosstalk amount increases, the correction coefficients also become greater.

(72) Accordingly, with the present embodiment, shooting is performed beforehand changing the optical conditions, illumination color temperature conditions, and so froth, correction coefficients are calculated corresponding to the output of the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1, i.e., to the evaluation value (K), and a relational expression such as shown in FIG. 9 is created. With the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2, upon the evaluation value (K) being output from the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1, such a relational expression is referenced to obtain correction coefficients corresponding to the crosstalk amount in the area where shooting is actually being performed.

(73) Finally, description will be made regarding the crosstalk correction unit 3. As described above, with crosstalk, phenomena from the vertical direction and horizontal direction are dominant (see FIG. 4A). Accordingly, with the crosstalk correction unit 3, the signal of the pixel to be corrected is corrected by subtracting several tenths of the each of the signals of pixels adjacent vertically and horizontally, from the signal of the pixel to be corrected as crosstalk amount, following the correction expression shown in Expression (3) above for example, using the correction coefficients a, b, c, and d of the adjacent pixels calculated by the crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2.

(74) So far, a method has been described for calculating crosstalk correction coefficients for pixels to be corrected, with a size of around 4?4 pixels as the minimum increment. However, in reality there are cases wherein there is no need to calculate correction coefficients with such a fine granularity. Accordingly, a method for calculating correction coefficients with an image beforehand, or with a certain size, to handle processing of moving images, will be described below.

(75) FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a region (block) for calculating correction coefficients with a certain size. In the example in the drawing, we will say that each block is made up of 100?100 pixels, and one imaged image is made up of 6?8 blocks.

(76) At the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1, upon calculating the average of the pixel values of each color of and white as processing for each block, the evaluation value (K) is calculated following the above Expression (1). Then at the downstream crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 2 and crosstalk correction unit 3, calculation of correction coefficients and pixel value correction processing are each performed.

(77) Now, as shown in FIG. 11, we will say that memory 4 is provided to hold the evaluation value (K) calculated at the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1. The evaluation value (K) calculated at the crosstalk amount calculating unit 1 is then saved in the memory 4, the evaluation value (K) is updated at a certain number of fixed intervals, and correction processing is performed on the imaged data. With 100?100 pixel blocks as the minimum increment, pixels of the same color within a processing increment have two or more outputs, so the average value of signal amount is preferably used to calculate the above Expression (4). The number of pixels for calculating the evaluation value (K) is great, so even if there is much noise included in the data, an accurate evaluation value (K) can be obtained by averaging.

(78) $\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Mathematical}\mathrm{Expression}4\right]& \\ K=\frac{\mathrm{average}\mathrm{of}?R+\mathrm{average}\mathrm{of}?G+\mathrm{average}\mathrm{of}?B}{\mathrm{average}\mathrm{of}W\mathrm{.Math.}}& \left(4\right)\end{array}$

(79) Also, in the event that the difference in correction is conspicuous at boundary portions of the blocks in the image following having performed crosstalk correction, this portion can be made inconspicuous by averaging the correction coefficients between the adjacent blocks.

(80) While description has been made so far regarding an embodiment of the present invention using the example shown in FIG. 12 as a filter array including white pixels, but the essence of the present invention is not restricted by color coding. For example, the evaluation value for knowing crosstalk amount can be calculated from shooting data alone for arrays with different RGB arrays such as shown in FIG.

(81) 13A and FIG. 13B, or arrays using complementary color filters instead of primary color filters as shown in FIG. 13C, for example, in the same way as described above, and crosstalk correction processing can be performed using correction coefficients adapted to his evaluation value.

(82) Also, the present invention performs crosstalk correction of each pixel based on the evaluation results of crosstalk amount of white signals as to adjacent RGB signals (see FIG. 4B) and crosstalk amount of RGB signals as to adjacent white signals (see FIG. 4C), and in other words, white pixels are necessary for evaluating the crosstalk amount.

(83) However, there is no need for the white pixels to be uniformly arrayed over the entire imaging device face, and calculation of crosstalk evaluation values can be performed simply by disposing white pixels in just a partial manner. FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a filter array in which arrays including white pixels such as shown in FIG. 12B are scattered throughout a Bayer array not including white pixels (see FIG. 12A). In such a case, crosstalk amount can be obtained from the array shown in FIG. 12B, and the crosstalk within the Bayer array can be corrected based on the crosstalk correction coefficients calculated using this crosstalk amount.

(84) FIG. 15 schematically illustrates the way in which multiple evaluation calculating arrays such as shown in FIG. 12B are disposed on the imaging device face based on a Bayer array (see FIG. 12A). Evaluating each crosstalk amount using each evaluation calculating array allows the degree of crosstalk to be known over the entire face of the imaging device. Crosstalk then can be adaptively corrected in each region by deciding crosstalk correction coefficients based on the evaluation value of the crosstalk amount obtained from a nearby evaluation calculating arrays.

(85) Now, the relation between crosstalk amount evaluation value and correction coefficients is obtained beforehand, as shown in FIG. 9. The relation between the evaluation value and correction coefficients may be obtained for each evaluation calculating arrays.

(86) The crosstalk correction in each region can be performed using the above Expression (3). Alternatively, crosstalk correction may be performed following the matrix operation shown in the following Expression (5), after performing interpolation processing at the interpolation processing circuit 23 (see FIG. 1).

(87) $\begin{array}{cc}\left[\mathrm{Mathematical}\mathrm{Expression}5\right]& \\ \left(\begin{array}{c}{R}_i^{}\\ G_i^{}\\ B_i^{}\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}{R}_{11}& G_{12}& B_{13}\\ R_{21}& G_{22}& B_{23}\\ R_{31}& G_{32}& B_{33}\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}{R}_i\\ G_i\\ B_i\end{array}\right)& \left(5\right)\end{array}$
R, G, B: Signals following correction
R, G, B: Signals before correction
R.sub.11, G.sub.12, B.sub.13, R.sub.21, G.sub.22, B.sub.23, R.sub.31, G.sub.32, B.sub.33: Correction
coefficients
i: position of pixel in imaging device array

(88) In the event that the pixel array of the imaging device is partially different as shown in FIG. 15, the interpolation circuit 23 needs to be changed. The interpolation method can be switched at predetermined pixel positions for this changing. FIG. 16 illustrates a configuration example of an imaging device for switching the interpolation method according to the pixel position. Note however, that only relevant parts are extracted and shown in this drawing. Interpolation processing can be performed at an interpolation circuit 23A at pixel position following the Bayer array, and switched to interpolation processing at the interpolation circuit 23 for pixel positions for the evaluation value calculation arrays (see FIG. 12B).

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

(89) While the present invention has been described in detail with reference to a particular embodiment, it is self-evident that one of ordinary skill in the art can make modifications and substitutions to the embodiment without departing from the essence of the present invention. The present invention can be applied to, for example, a camera apparatus such as a digital still camera or video camera, various types of electronic equipment in which a camera module is implemented, such as cellular telephones, and so forth.

(90) While an embodiment of the present invention has been described in the Present Description using the example shown in FIG. 12 as a filter array including white pixels, the essence of the present invention is not restricted to this. For example, the evaluation value for knowing crosstalk amount can be calculated from shooting data alone for arrays with different RGB arrays such as shown in FIG. 13A and FIG. 13B, or arrays using complementary color filters instead of primary color filters as shown in FIG. 13C, for example, in the same way as described above, and crosstalk correction processing can be performed using correction coefficients adapted to this evaluation value.

(91) In short, the present invention has been disclosed exemplarily, and the contents of description within the Present Description should not be interpreted restrictively. The Claims should be taken into consideration to determined the essence of the present invention.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

(92) 1 crosstalk amount calculating unit 2 crosstalk correction coefficient calculating unit 3 crosstalk correction unit 10 imaging apparatus 11 imaging lens 12 imaging device 13 A/D converter (ADC) 14 camera signal processing circuit 21 optical system correcting unit 22 WB (white balance) circuit 23 interpolation processing unit 24 gamma correction circuit 25 Y-signal processing circuit 26 C-signal processing circuit 27 band limiting LPF (low-pass filter) 28 thinning out circuit