Multistage container leak testing

Abstract

A coarse-fine two-stage leak detection is carried out on sealed, filled containers loaded into container holders or pucks. Failure of the first, coarse leak detection stage, e.g. a pressure-course or impedance or laser-absorption based leak detection stage, causes containers to be rejected together with their corresponding container holders. These are then separated, and the container holder is cleaned and dried before being returned to the system. Any leaking product from inside a grossly leaking container is thus retained within the container holder, thus reducing contamination of subsequent containers and their container holders, preventing such contamination from reaching the fine leak detection stage, e.g. a mass-spectrometer-based leak detection stage.

Claims

1. A method of leak testing closed, filled containers comprising: loading containers into corresponding container holders, each container holder being adapted to receive a single container; conveying, on a conveyor, the containers in the respective corresponding container holders to a first leak testing station including a first leak testing arrangement; subjecting the containers in the respective corresponding container holders to a first leak detection step, and rejecting together with their corresponding container holders containers identified as leaking based on the first leak detection step; conveying, on the conveyor, the containers not identified as leaking in the first leak detection step in the respective corresponding container holders to a second leak testing station including a second leak testing arrangement; and subjecting the containers not identified as leaking in the first leak detection step in their container holders to a second leak detection step, wherein the container holders are configured to be removable from the conveyor by the first leak testing arrangement and the second leak testing arrangement.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: rejecting containers identified as leaking in the second leak detection step in their corresponding container holders.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: unloading containers subjected to the second leak detection step from the container holders, and then rejecting unloaded containers identified as leaking in the second leak detection step.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: unloading containers rejected based on the first leak detection step from their corresponding container holders, and cleaning the corresponding container holders; and cleaning the container holders rejected based on the second leak detection step.

5. The method according to the claim 4, wherein the cleaned container holders are reused.

6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising retaining within the container holders any product escaping from a container during the first leak detection step.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein: the first leak detection step is selected from a group consisting of: a pressure-course-based leak detection step, an impedance-based leak detection step and a laser-absorption-based leak detection step, and the second leak detection step is a mass-spectrometry-based leak detection step.

8. A method of manufacturing unleaky closed containers filled with a product, the method comprising: manufacturing untested filled containers; testing the containers by the method of claim 1; and accepting containers which have not been identified as leaking as being unleaky containers.

9. An apparatus for leak testing closed and filled containers comprising: a loading arrangement for loading containers into container holders, each container holder being adapted to contain a single container; a first leak testing station; a conveyor arrangement for inline conveying a plurality of the container holders towards, through and from the first leak testing station, the first leak testing station including a first leak testing arrangement operationally connectable to a surrounding of each of the containers; a first rejection mechanism operated based on an output of the first leak testing arrangement and arranged to reject container holders containing a container determined as leaking by the first leak testing arrangement; and a second leak testing station, wherein: the conveyor arrangement is further adapted for inline conveying non-rejected container holders towards, through and from the second leak testing station, the second leak testing station including a second leak testing arrangement operationally connectable to the surrounding of each of the containers, an output signal of the second leak testing arrangement being decisive for unleakiness of each respective container; and the container holders are configured to be removable from the conveyor arrangement by the first leak testing arrangement and the second leak testing arrangement.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising a second rejection mechanism operated based on an output of the second leak testing arrangement and arranged to reject container holders containing a container determined as leaky by the second leak testing arrangement.

11. The apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising: a second unloading arrangement downstream of the second leak testing station for unloading the containers from the container holders, and a second rejection mechanism operated based on the output signal of the second leak testing arrangement for rejecting containers identified as leaky by the second leak testing arrangement.

12. The apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising a first unloading arrangement for unloading containers rejected based on a first detection step from their corresponding container holders and a cleaning arrangement for cleaning the corresponding container holders.

13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein: the first unloading arrangement is further adapted for unloading containers rejected based on a second detection step from their corresponding container holders, and the cleaning arrangement is further adapted for cleaning the corresponding container holders.

14. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the container holders each include a holding volume for retaining product that escapes from the containers.

15. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein: the first leak testing arrangement is selected from a group consisting of: a pressure-course-based leak detection arrangement, an impedance-based leak detection arrangement, and a laser-absorption based leak detection arrangement, and the second leak testing arrangement comprises a mass-spectrometry-based leak detection arrangement.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) The invention will now be illustrated by means of non-limiting exemplary embodiments in the attached figures, which show:

(2) FIG. 1a-1ca selection of container holders illustrated schematically in cross-section and plan view;

(3) FIG. 1da selection of multiple container holders in plan view;

(4) FIG. 2a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the invention;

(5) FIG. 3a schematic block diagram of a further embodiment of the invention;

(6) FIG. 4schematically and generically a diagram of manufacturing unleaky containers according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(7) Container holders are known in the industry as pucks. They may either simply be holders for containers to be tested by a leak testing arrangement, or they may furthermore also form part of a test chamber for such a leak testing arrangement. In the former case, the container holder will be received completely inside a test chamber, whereas in the latter case the container holder itself forms part of the test chamber, a further test chamber section being brought into sealed contact with the container holder such that the test chamber is formed by the container holder and the further test chamber section.

(8) FIGS. 1a-1c provide several illustrations of shapes of container holders in cross-section and plan view. In FIG. 1a, container holder 101 illustrates a simple form of container holder, and comprises a container holder body 101.sub.b provided with an opening 101.sub.o for receiving a container (not illustrated). The container holder body 101.sub.b may be cylindrical or any other convenient shape, and likewise the opening 101.sub.o may likewise be of cylindrical cross-section, or of any other convenient cross-section.

(9) In FIG. 1b, container holder 102 is similar to container holder 101, except that it further comprises a plurality of through holes 102.sub.c which penetrate container holder body 102.sub.b from the outer surface of the container holder 102 to the inner surface of the opening 102.sub.a. The purpose of these through-holes 102.sub.c is to permit the equalization of pressure in the opening 102.sub.o with that of a test chamber during a pressure-based leak test, and thereby to additionally expose the lower portion of a container being tested to the increased or decreased pressure in the test chamber.

(10) In FIG. 1c, container holder 103 differs from the above-mentioned container holders 100 and 102 in that the body 103.sub.b of container holder 103 is provided with an axial extension 103.sub.d of smaller outer diameter than the container holder body 103.sub.b, and that through holes 103c are provided through the wall of axial extension 103.sub.d. Through holes 103d serve the same purpose as through holes 102.sub.c as described above.

(11) The exact form of the container holder 100 can easily be determined according to the desired application, and may be adapted to support a particular shape of container. Particularly, the shape of the opening 101.sub.o, 102.sub.o, 103.sub.o may be conformed as desired to fit a particular container shape, and the blind end of the opening may be shaped so as to act as a reservoir to contain and retain any product that may leak out of a container during a leak testing step.

(12) FIG. 1d illustrates a double container holder 104 and a quadruple container holder 105. Each opening 104.sub.o, 105.sub.o respectively is adapted to receive a container, and may comprise through-holes with the same form and purpose as those illustrated in FIGS. 1c and 1d. This permits parallel testing of multiple containers, to increase the testing throughput rate. The exact number of cavities and the outer shape of the container holds 104, 105 can be chosen at will according to the requirements of the process operator.

(13) FIG. 2 shows schematically as a block diagram a system 200 according to the invention adapted for carrying out a method according to the invention. Thin lines with single arrows illustrate the passage of containers, thin lines with double arrows illustrate the passage of container holders, and thick lines with triple arrows illustrate the passage of loaded container holders, i.e. a container holder containing a container. All of the above-mentioned lines indicate conveying paths that may be constituted by any known type of conveyor, e.g. a linear conveyor, an arcuate conveyor, a rotary conveyor, a robot, a carousel-type conveyor, and so on.

(14) Filled containers c are supplied at 201, e.g. directly from a manufacturing line or from an intermediate storage. Container holders h are likewise supplied at 202, either from a magazine for storing the container holders h, or from a continuously circulating stream of container holders h. Containers c are loaded into container holders h at 203, and are conveyed to a first leak testing station 204 (which may comprise e.g. a plurality of test chambers on a rotary carousel arrangement), where the containers are subject to a first, coarse, leak test T.sub.1 in a test chamber 204.sub.c, which may as previously discussed be either a unitary test chamber or a test chamber formed partly by container holder h and another test chamber component. This first leak test may for instance be a pressure-course method such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,093, U.S. Pat. No. 6,082,184, U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,477, U.S. Pat. No. 6,305,215, U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,033, U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,016, U.S. Pat. No. 6,829,936, U.S. Pat. No. 7,000,456 and further related patent documents by the same applicant, or may be an impedance-based method such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,446,493 or U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,987, or may be a laser absorption method such as an infrared and/or visible-spectrum and/or ultraviolet laser absorption method. Based on the result of first leak detection test T.sub.1, if the container tested is determined as leaking, a rejection mechanism (not illustrated) rejects the container together with its container holder h along pathway F.sub.1. At 205, the rejected container is removed from its container holder h, either by hand or automatically. The leaking container c is then discarded at 206. The container holder h in question is likely to have become contaminated with product from inside the rejected container, and is thus subjected to cleaning at 207, which may be by hand or by machine. The thoroughly cleaned and dried container holder h is then returned to 202, i.e. is put into a container holder magazine or is returned to the circulating container holders h on a conveyor at an appropriate point. Since any contamination is restricted to the inside of the container holder h, cross contamination of subsequent containers and container holders is significantly reduced.

(15) Containers c which have not been detected as leaking by first leak detection test T.sub.1 are conveyed along path P.sub.1 from first leak testing station 204 to second leak testing station 208 (which may likewise comprise e.g. a plurality of test chambers on a rotary carousel arrangement), in which they are subjected to a second, fine, leak detection test T.sub.2 in a test chamber 208.sub.c, which may for instance be a mass-spectrometry-based test such as that disclosed in WO 2011/012730, or a mass-spectrometry-based test including a tracer such as helium, or any other fine leak-detection test.

(16) Containers c determined as leaking by second leak detection test T.sub.2 are rejected by a rejection mechanism (not illustrated), travel along path F.sub.2, and are unloaded from the corresponding container holder h at 209, either automatically or by hand. As above, the rejected containers c are disposed of at 206. Container holders may either be directly returned to 202, i.e. they are put into a container holder magazine or are returned to the circulating container holders h on a conveyor at an appropriate point, or may optionally be directed for cleaning at 207 as above via optional switch 210.

(17) Containers c not determined as leaking by second leak test T.sub.2 are considered as being unleaky and are unloaded from the container holders h at 211, and then transported for further processing, packaging etc at 212. Empty container holders h are then returned to 202, i.e. are put into a container holder magazine or are returned to the circulating container holders h on a conveyor at an appropriate point.

(18) FIG. 3 shows schematically as a block diagram a further variation of a system 200 according to the invention adapted for carrying out a method according to the invention. Blocks 201-207 are identical to those of FIG. 2, thus need not be discussed further. The second leak testing station 208 performs second leak detection test T.sub.2 as above, however in this embodiment the container holders are not rejected directly after performing second leak detection test T.sub.2. In this embodiment, all containers are transported along path P.sub.2 and are unloaded at 211. Container holders h are directly returned to 202, i.e. are put into a container holder magazine or are returned to the circulating container holders h on a conveyor at an appropriate point, or may optionally be directed for cleaning at 207 as above via optional switch 210 if required.

(19) After being unloaded at 211, containers c are transported to rejection mechanism 213, which is controlled based on output 208.sub.o of second leak detection test T.sub.2 in second leak detection station 208. Leak detection test T.sub.2 allocates a result of detecting a leak to the corresponding container, and controls rejection mechanism 213 accordingly so as to reject the leaking container such that it can be disposed at 214. Non-rejected containers c are then transported for further processing, packaging etc at 212.

(20) In both of the embodiments of FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, alternatively multiple container holders h such as those illustrated in FIG. 1d may be utilised for parallel testing of containers, either in a common test chamber or in a plurality of parallel test chambers. In this case, if at least one container in a container holder is detected as leaking in first leak detection test T.sub.1 in block 204, then the container holder and all the containers contained therein are rejected along pathway F.sub.1, all of the containers are removed from the container holder h, and at least the leaky container is discarded, if it is identifiable. If not, all the containers are discarded.

(21) Likewise, if at least one container in a container holder h is detected as leaking in second leak detection test T.sub.2, at least the leaking container is rejected and discarded if it can be identified, otherwise all the containers from the container holder h in question are rejected and discarded.

(22) FIG. 4 shows schematically and generically a system for manufacturing unleaky containers: note that for clarity and simplicity container holders are not illustrated. In block M, containers are manufactured and filled, producing untested containers c.sub.u. These untested containers c.sub.u are then passed to block T.sub.1, where they are subject to a first (coarse) leak detection test. Coarsely leaking containers c.sub.f1 are rejected by first rejection mechanism R.sub.1 based on output of the first leak detection system output at T.sub.1o. Rejection mechanism R.sub.1 may also be incorporated into block T.sub.1. Containers c.sub.T1 not rejected based on output of the first leak detection system output at T.sub.1o are then passed to block T.sub.2, where they are subject to a second (fine) leak detection test. Finely-leaking containers c.sub.f2 are rejected by second rejection mechanism R.sub.2 based on output of the second leak detection system output at T.sub.2o. Rejection mechanism R.sub.2 may also be incorporated into block T.sub.2.

(23) Unleaky containers c.sub.p, having passed the complete leak detection test, are thus considered manufactured and are then passed on for further processing such as further filling if necessary, application of labels, boxing, shipping to customers and so on.

(24) While a full attempt has been made to describe the invention by means of various specific embodiments, these are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the scope of the appended claims. In particular, it is noted that all embodiments may be combined as long as the result is not contradictory.