Atomizer
10004859 ยท 2018-06-26
Assignee
Inventors
- Robert Gerhard Winkler (Aschaffenburg, DE)
- Herbert Wachtel (Ingelheim am Rhein, DE)
- Stephen Terence Dunne (Ipswich, GB)
- Andree JUNG (Idar-Oberstein, DE)
Cpc classification
A61M15/009
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M11/02
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M2205/8225
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M11/002
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M15/0051
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M15/0045
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M15/0043
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61M11/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M11/04
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M11/02
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The invention relates to an apparatus for nebulizing preferably powdered medicinal formulations, the nebulization being assisted by propellant. According to the invention, the propellant is supplied in pulsed form to the powder cavity (1) containing the formulation, which is attached to the nozzle (3) from which the aerosol is emitted. The apparatus according to the invention provides an increase in the fraction of pulmonary particles in the aerosol leaving the nozzle (3).
Claims
1. An apparatus for nebulising powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the nebulisation is assisted by a propellant which is supplied to a cavity in which is contained a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation, characterised in that the apparatus comprises a device which has an inlet at which propellant is present, and through which the propellant can be conveyed, said device causing such flow characteristics in the propellant as it passes through that it exits the device in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another and is supplied to the cavity in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another; and a dosing valve producing a single dose of the propellant upstream of the device and delivering the single dose of the propellant to the device such that the single dose of the propellant is converted into the plurality of successive pulses or bursts of propellant, which ejects a single dose of the powdered medicinal formulation from the apparatus to the patient within a time interval which corresponds to a time a patient draws breath, wherein during the operation of the apparatus the device produces relatively low duty cycle pulses in which each pulse has a relatively short on-time where the pressure is relatively high followed by a relatively long off-time where the pressure is permitted to fall to or near zero.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the pulses or bursts are kept distinct from one another such that the flow of propellant comes to a standstill between the pulses and/or the pressure of the propellant leaving the device falls to zero or virtually zero.
3. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the propellant is stored in the form of liquefied propellant gas in a container or a cartridge (5), the apparatus having a metering valve for removing a measured volume of propellant from the container or the cartridge (5) and the device being located downstream of the metering valve.
4. The apparatus according to claim 3, characterised in that the device generates the pulses in the propellant such that the measured volume of propellant is divided into pulses or bursts in such a way that the division of the measured volume into pulses or bursts corresponds to a distribution of 100 microliters between at least 7 pulses or bursts.
5. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the propellant is supplied through a valve which divides the propellant present into a plurality of pulses by means of a plurality of opening and closing processes.
6. The apparatus according to claim 5, characterised in that the valve is an actuatable magnetic valve (13).
7. The apparatus according to claim 5, characterised in that during the operation of the apparatus the valve has opening times in the range from 3 to 30 milliseconds, and closure times in the range from 60 to 500 milliseconds.
8. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the propellant is supplied through a channel structure forming a microfluidic oscillator in which the pulses or bursts are produced in the propellant.
9. The apparatus according to claim 8, characterised in that the channel structure comprises at least one fork and a mixing region for fluid jets.
10. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that before being fed into the cavity the propellant is passed through a vaporiser (6) or heat exchanger.
11. The apparatus according to claim 10, characterised in that the vaporiser (6) has a cavity (9a) and contains in its cavity (9a) one or more heat exchange elements.
12. The apparatus according to claim 11, characterised in that metal beads and/or metal wires form the heat exchange element or the heat exchange elements.
13. The apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that a propellant stream charged with powdered medicinal formulation is conveyed from the cavity into a nozzle (3) and the nozzle (3) comprises a substantially rectilinear nozzle channel (3a).
14. The apparatus according to claim 13, characterised in that the feed line for propellant into the cavity and the axis through the nozzle channel (3a) both meet at an angle of between 30 and 45 in the cavity and/or at this angle relative to the base of the cavity.
15. The apparatus according to claim 13, characterised in that the nozzle channel (3a) comprises an inlet cone (3b) and/or an outlet cone (3c) and/or a wall of the nozzle channel (3a) is cylindrical, at least in a central region.
16. The apparatus according to claim 13, characterised in that the cavity in which a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation is contained in a powder cavity (1) which is streamlined in shape.
17. The apparatus according to claim 16, characterised in that the powder cavity (1) has a teardrop shape, a narrower end of the teardrop shape pointing in a direction of an inlet of the nozzle channel (3a).
18. The apparatus according to claim 16, characterised in that the powder cavity (1) has a powder cavity well (1a), which has a slope (1c) on a bottom of the powder cavity well (1a), this slope (1c) conveying the flow in the direction of the inlet of the nozzle channel (3a).
19. A method for nebulising powdered medicinal formulations, comprising: supplying a propellant in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts distinct from one another, to a cavity in which there is a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the propellant is supplied through a channel structure forming a microfluidic oscillator in which the pulses or bursts are produced in the propellant.
20. An apparatus for nebulising powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the nebulisation is assisted by a propellant which is supplied to a cavity in which is contained a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the apparatus comprises a device which has an inlet at which propellant is present, and through which the propellant can be conveyed, said device causing such flow characteristics in the propellant as it passes through that it exits the device in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another and is supplied to the cavity in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another, and the propellant is supplied through a channel structure forming a microfluidic oscillator in which the pulses or bursts are produced in the propellant.
21. An apparatus for nebulising powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the nebulisation is assisted by a propellant which is supplied to a cavity in which is contained a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the apparatus comprises a device which has an inlet at which propellant is present, and through which the propellant can be conveyed, said device causing such flow characteristics in the propellant as it passes through that it exits the device in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another and is supplied to the cavity in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another, and wherein during the operation of the apparatus the device produces relatively low duty cycle pulses in which each pulse has a relatively short on-time where the pressure is relatively high followed by a relatively long off-time where the pressure is permitted to fall to or near zero.
22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the on-time is in the range from 3 to 30 milliseconds, and the off-time is in the range from 60 to 500 milliseconds.
23. An apparatus for nebulising powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the nebulisation is assisted by a propellant which is supplied to a cavity in which is contained a measured amount of the powdered medicinal formulation, wherein the apparatus comprises a device which has an inlet at which propellant is present, and through which the propellant can be conveyed, said device causing such flow characteristics in the propellant as it passes through that it exits the device in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another and is supplied to the cavity in the form of a plurality of successive pulses or bursts which are kept distinct from one another, wherein a propellant stream charged with powdered medicinal formulation is conveyed from the cavity into a nozzle (3) and the nozzle (3) comprises a substantially rectilinear nozzle channel (3a), and wherein the feed line for propellant into the cavity and the axis through the nozzle channel (3a) both meet at an angle of between 30 and 45 in the cavity and/or at this angle relative to the base of the cavity.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Further advantages, features, properties and aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the claims and the following description of preferred embodiments with reference to the drawings, wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17) In the Figures, the same reference numerals have been used for identical or similar parts with which corresponding or comparable properties and advantages are achieved, even if the description has not been repeated.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(18)
(19) In the nebulisation of powders, propellant is conveyed from a cartridge (5), directly or preferably after passing completely through a vaporiser (6) or heat exchanger, into a powder cavity (1) on which is placed a nozzle (3) which in turn opens into a mouthpiece (2). In the use of a vaporiser (6), as is preferred here, this should be installed in the system so that it is not possible for any of the propellant expelled from the valve on the cartridge (5) to get past the vaporiser (6) via a bypass and enter the powder cavity (1). The propellant expels the powder from the powder cavity (1) through the nozzle (3). If at the same time a user or patient breathes air in through the mouthpiece (2), the powder is picked up by the breathed in air as it leaves the nozzle (2) and flows past the nozzle through the mouthpiece (2) into the lungs. Thus, the powder is carried into the patient's lungs as a result of the suction of his breath.
(20) Both the test device and an inhaler constructed for the same mode of operation are preferably operated by pointing the base of the cartridge (1) upwards, i.e. so that the valve stem (7) of the cartridge (1) is directed downwards. This type of operation is analogous to the operation of a conventional metered dose aerosol (hereinafter frequently referred to by the common English abbreviation MDI). The propellant is metered by means of a valve belonging to the cartridge (again, analogously to the conventional MDI), the release of a unit of propellant being triggered for example by pressure on the base of the cartridge (5).
(21) In the test device shown in
(22) The test device has the advantage that the modules inserted in the test device can be varied and the effect of the particular variation on the nebulisation characteristics can be determined. Preferably, a system for generating a flow, e.g. a conventional laboratory control panel with a conventional pump, is also connected to the test device so that different suction strengths can be tried out on the mouthpiece (2). The nebulisation of the powder used in the test device can be investigated by the same methods as nebulisation from inhalers, particularly by means of laser diffraction methods, high speed cameras and cascade impactors. The measured results on which this specification is based were determined using a cascade impactor configured as stipulated in the European Pharmacopoeia (Version 7.0) (Apparatus E according to Chapter 2.9.18 of the European Pharmacopoeia) to determine the fine particle content of the delivered dose (the measurements additionally being carried out at different flow rates). This fine particle content relates to particle sizes less than 5 microns in diameter and is occasionally also referred to by the abbreviation FPD (derived from the frequently used English term Fine Particle Dose). In the measurements with the cascade impactor used for this purpose, the deposits of active substance on the individual collection plates forming the cascade stages and the connection of the cascade impactor were individually washed for each measurement and the resulting solutions were investigated by high pressure liquid chromatography. Different size categories of nebulised particles are collected in the individual cascade stages during measurement, so that the respective amounts of the dose for each size category can be determined by chromatography of the solution from the respective cascade stage. The test device is preferably used for testing the nebulisation of powdered medicinal formulations. Preferred formulations consist of jet-ground and screened active substance which is mixed with lactose. Any desired mixing ratios up to pure active substance can be tested using the test device.
(23) For most measurements a powder cavity (1) with a capacity of about 0.2 milliliters was used, into which usually 50 milligrams of a lactose-based formulation containing 32.5% of an active pharmaceutical substance (an active substance in development) were placed. For the nebulisation concept described here, however, powder cavities (1) may also be filled with amounts of up to 100 milligrams of powder; 21 milligrams, 60 milligrams, 70 milligrams and 75 milligrams were tested, for example (some of them with a formulation containing 98% fenoterol-HBr, as this active substance is well suited to the extreme testing of the nebulisation of inhalers). The size of the powder cavity (1) may be adapted to the amount of powder to be contained therein. Amounts of up to 250 milligrams of powder are possible if the powder cavity (1) and the propellant feed are suitably adapted (up to higher pressures and greater bursts of propellant). The shape of the powder cavity is preferably adapted to the design of the nozzle attached thereto. The expulsion of such large amounts of powder, compared with standard commercial powder inhalers, is made possible in this case by the use of propellants. Preferably, hydrofluoralkanes (so-called HFAs) are used. Particularly preferably, HFA R134a (norflurane or 1,1,1-trifluoroethane or 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane) is used as propellant in the cartridge (1); preferably, cartridges with metering valves which expel 100 microliters per activation are used. The size of the valve may be adjusted in accordance with the quantity of formulation used; standard commercial sizes such as 25, 50, 100, 180 up to 500 microliters may be used. Thus, within the scope of the results provided here, for smaller amounts of formulation, smaller propellant units were also used, such as for example 50 microliters of propellant to 21 milligrams of powder. Preferably, the standard commercial valves were connected to metallic containers, in particular the valves were crimped to aluminium containers with a capacity of 10 milliliters during the manufacture of the cartridge. The cartridges were filled with the propellant gas R134a. In the cartridge (5) the propellant is present in liquefied formas in standard commercial metered dose aerosols (MDIs). It evaporates under normal pressure at 26.3 C. and develops a vapour pressure of 5.7 bar at 20 C. However, other propellants such as other hydrofluoralkanes such as, for example, HFA 227ea (apafluran or 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane), liquid nitrogen or conventional propellants such as halohydrocarbons may be used in this arrangement.
(24) The test device shown in
(25) The vaporiser (6) has the effect that the measured amount of propellant released by the metering valve which was present in liquid form in the cartridge (5) is converted completely into the gaseous state before it is fed into the powder cavity (1). The propellant is dried to some extent. This prevents liquid propellant from causing the powder to clump together. Clumped powder disperses substantially less well and the pulmonary delivery of the aerosol particles produced during the nebulisation deteriorates. Video images with a high-speed camera by means of which the interior of the powder cavity (1) has been observed through a transparent base of the powder cavity (1) during the feeding of propellant demonstrate that the clumping referred to above occurs if no vaporiser (6) is used, whereas when the vaporiser described in detail hereinafter is used no agglomeration or clumping can be detected.
(26)
(27) The action of the vaporiser (6) is based on heat exchange mechanisms. The vaporiser (6) itself is preferably made of metal and the cavity is preferably also filled with metal components, which are referred to hereinafter as heat exchange elements. The propellant kept liquid under pressure in the cartridge (5) evaporates under normal pressure, above about 25 C. in the present embodiment. Thus if it is able to expand in the cavity of the vaporiser (6), it changes from the liquid state into the gaseous state. The heat exchange elements assist or accelerate this evaporation by giving off heat to the propellant flowing along them. The heat exchange elements preferably have the largest possible surface area for this reason. This increases the entire inner surface area of the vaporiser, i.e. the contact surface for the heat exchange mechanism, and reduces the dead volume, i.e. the empty space inside the vaporiser.
(28) Metals are the preferred material for all the components of the vaporiser, as they have a high heat conductivity and consequently favour the evaporation of the propellant coming into contact with them. It is possible to use most of the metals that are solid at ambient temperature, stainless steels being particularly preferred as they are compatible with the majority of propellants, provided that no constituents of the metal are absorbed by the propellant and fed into the nebulisation. Noble metals such as silver and gold are also highly suitable but are usually ruled out on cost grounds. Both for the body (9) of the vaporiser (6) and for heat exchange elements in its cavity (9a) aluminium, stainless steel or copper are specifically preferred materials. In one embodiment used in tests, the body (9) of the vaporiser (6) is made of aluminium and the cavity (9a) is filled with beads (11) of stainless steel. Depending on the evaporation characteristics of the propellant chosen, it may on occasion be sufficient if only the heat exchange elements are made of metal and the body (9) itself is made of plastics. This has cost advantages during production. The vaporiser may be varied in terms of its length and hence the number of heat exchange elements as well, in order to be adapted to the quantity of propellant used. Thus, when small amounts of propellant are used, a smaller or shorter vaporiser may be used. In the course of tests, in conjunction with metering valves that release 50 microliters of propellant, a vaporiser (6) with an inner space 6 millimeters long and filled with 27 steel beads 2 millimeters in diameter was used, for example. In conjunction with 100 microliter valves a 12 millimeter long vaporiser (6) with 48 beads (11) was used. This ratio of vaporiser length or number of beads (11) to the volume of the metering valve used can be scaled up or down as desiredincluding for larger metering valves.
(29) To ensure that none of the beads (11) displaces the outlet (9c) in the bottom of the funnel (9b), in the specific embodiment shown there is a coiled wire (12) in the funnel (9b), made of copper, for example, which keeps the beads (11) away from the outlet (9c). If desired the metal beads can also be replaced by a long, thin, coiled metal wire in the cavity (9a). In the embodiment shown, the beads (11) have a diameter of 2 millimeters, and opposite them is an outlet (9c) with a diameter of 1 millimeter.
(30) The configuration or arrangement of the components as a whole is selected such that on the one hand the vaporiser (6) has the largest possible inner surface for efficient vaporisation of the propellant but on the other hand the filling with heat exchange elements has a sufficient number of small free cross-sections so that its flow resistance does not become so high, i.e. so that it does not slow down the propellant passing through it too much. In this context a flow resistance of about 465000 N*s/m.sup.410% is preferred, in relation to air (the flow resistances for propellant may be expected to be even lower than for air. This corresponds to a flow of 10 liters per minute occurring with a pressure drop of 6 kilopascals (a flow of less than 5 liters per minute with a pressure drop of 6 kilopascals would constitute a less favourable flow resistance, for example, with the propellant gas being significantly slowed down on its way through the vaporiser). The flow resistance of the vaporiser is influenced by its geometry and by the size and shape of the heat exchange elements contained therein. In the configuration preferred here, the interstices between the beads make it possible to achieve a good flow through the vaporiser, the contours in transitional regions are fluidically favourable as a result of the use of cone structures and the spherical shape of the heat exchange elements also helps to ensure that there is little or no turbulence in the flow. As a result, there is only a small drop in the pressure of the propellant in the vaporiser, and therefore the flow of gas is slowed down only a little. This is advantageous in that a high propellant sped is essential for good dispersion of the powder.
(31) The speed of the propellant on entering the powder cavity (1) may be influenced, particularly constricted, by the size of the diameters of the feed channels. In the case of the test device, different connectors (4) with different feed channel widths can be tested. With the measured results that form the basis here, channel diameters ranging from 0.2 to 2 millimeters between the vaporiser (6) and powder cavity (1) were tested, with diameters ranging from 1 to 2 millimeters proving particularly suitable. In the case of an inhaler suitable for mass production, it is advisable for reasons of cost to connect the vaporiser (6) with a suitably sized outlet (9c) directly to the powder cavity (1).
(32) On the one hand, a high propellant speed on entering the powder cavity (1) is advantageous in terms of the dispersion of the powder and hence for the inhalability of the aerosol particles expelled by the nebuliser, but on the other hand it is not desirable if the entire nebulisation process is completed within a small fraction of a second. (According to observations taken with a high speed camera, a propellant gas cartridge with a 100 microliter valve sprays for about 50 to 60 milliseconds.) This would make it difficult for a patient to coordinate his breathing with the production of the aerosol that is to be breathed in. Therefore, a process has been developed here for dividing the nebulisation process into a number of short nebulisation processes and to combine these in a time interval that corresponds in its duration to one inward breath of a patient. A time interval that is suitable for such coordination is of the order of 1 second. By breaking the nebulisation down into a plurality of staggered processes, the release of aerosol as a whole can be slowed down, while the propellant itself enters the powder cavity (1) at the high speed that is suitable for the dispersion of the powder. Various constructions will be described hereinafter, which are suitable for delivering a plurality of successive bursts (pulses) of propellant.
(33) The flow diagram in
(34) However, when a magnetic valve arrangement is used (according to
(35)
(36) The comparatively very high fine particle content values for the delivered dose were achieved with the shortest opening times t.sub.1 of 7 or 10 milliseconds, while additionally the fine particle content was apparently hardly dependent at all on the closure time t.sub.2. For this reason, and because it is desirable in the interests of better coordination of a breathing process with the pulse sequence for the entire sequence to be no longer than 1 second, the use of opening times t.sub.1 in the region of only 7 milliseconds and closure times t.sub.2 of only about 100 milliseconds is well suited to the use of the nebuliser as an inhaler.
(37) The outlet of the magnetic valve unit is in turn connected to another channel in the flange plate (14) and this additional channel leads to an outlet which is configured such that the vaporiser (6) can be directly connected thereto. Preferably, the outlet on the flange plate (14) is configured for this purpose as a cover (8) for the vaporiser (6), so that the body (9) of the vaporiser (6) can be connected directly to the flange plate (14). This contributes to the short configuration of the channel paths between the magnetic valve (13) and vaporiser (6) and hence to a reduction in possible dead volumes. In its embodiment as a cover (8) of the vaporiser (6) the outlet on the flange plate (14) has a projection with a central channel opening, this projection fitting straight up into the body (8) of the vaporiser (6). For the embodiment of a radially symmetrical vaporiser (6) according to
(38)
(39) When the magnetic valve V of the arrangement according to
(40) TABLE-US-00001 number opening time maximum delay of of the magnetic valve between the pulses pulses in milliseconds in milliseconds 1 50 2 25 500 3 16.7 330 4 12.7 200 8 6.25 125 9 5.2 110 16 3.125 60
(41) For the measurements carried out within the scope of this development a delay of at least 50 milliseconds was set between two pulses, i.e. a closure time t.sub.2 of 50 milliseconds between two opening times t.sub.1 of the valve. In the measurements, the number of pulses was varied in the range from 1 to 16 and the closure time t.sub.2 was varied within the range from 50 to 400 milliseconds. A trend of better emptying of the powder cavity (1) with an increasing number of pulses (associated in this case by shorter opening times) and an increasing closure time between the pulses was observed. Good results in terms of the delivery of powder from the powder cavity were obtained accordingly at a medium settingextrapolated part for the range of 7-10 pulses with a 200 to 100 millisecond delay. This number of pulses corresponds to opening times t.sub.1 of 5 to 7 milliseconds in relation to the arrangement shown in
(42) Tests with variations in the pressure of the propellant gas in the range between 2 and 6 bar and variations in the numbers of pulses in the range from 1 to 16 showed, by means of a powder cavity (1) with an internal capacity of 0.19 milliliter (corresponding to 45 milligram lactose or 50 milligram of the lactose-based formulation with 32.5% active substance), that both the delivery of the powder from the powder cavity (1) and the fine particle content of the expelled particles increases as the pressure rises. The effect of pressure particularly on the fine particle content increases to begin with as the number of pulses rises. For the range of 7-14 pulses (corresponding to opening times 7 to 4 milliseconds) the test results showed the highest values at higher pressures. In this pulse range, presumably pressure peaks were able to occur in the powder cavity, which are particularly favourable for the breaking up of the particles. At higher numbers of pulses, the influence of the pressure appears to decrease again (presumably the valve opening times are then too short to enable the full degree of pressure in front of the valve to build up again behind the valve).
(43) In all, the aerosol measurements that were obtained using the nebuliser devices with pulsed propellant feed as described hereinbefore showed that by using a large number of pulses and long delay times between the pulses, it is possible to increase the delivery of active substance and the fine particle content of the delivered dose. Comparative measurements showed an increase in the fine particle content to a value corresponding to about 130% of the value achieved with a corresponding device without a magnetic valve.
(44) In all, with the measurements on which this specification is based, using both a magnetic valve (13) for pulsing the propellant and also a vaporiser (6), very large amounts of powdered formulations were able to be expelled from powder cavities (1): thus, for example, it was possible to obtain 16.5 milligram of fenoterol as the fine particle content from 75 milligrams of a powder mixture containing 98% fenoterol (with 92.5% emptying of the powder cavity, at an applied flow rate of 30 liters per minute). When a propellant-driven device of this kind with a vaporiser and magnetic valve is used, the strength of the flow rate applied to the mouthpiece of the nebuliser, within the scope of the measurements carried out here, did not appear to have any significant influence on the fine particle content of the delivered dose (flow rates tested varied in the range from 30 to 90 liters per minute).
(45)
(46) The flow path in
(47)
(48) Beyond the representations of microfluidic components in
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52) The connecting side (3g) by which the nozzle (3) in the embodiment of the test device shown is placed against the powder cavity (1) is bent, according to the geometry of the connector (4), relative to the axis formed by the nozzle channel (3a), preferably through 45 in this instance. At this angle the propellant also strikes the powder cavity (1) at an angle of 45 beforehand, but other, flatter, angles are also possible. It is advantageous to design the exit of the nozzle channel (3a) from the powder cavity (1) as a mirror image at the same angle as the feed of propellant. This mirror image configuration is matched to the nozzle (3) attached to the powder cavity (1) and its particular rectilinear construction. When another nozzle (3) is chosen, such as, for example, a vortex nozzle or a nozzle the function of which defines a preceding vortex chamber, this rectilinear arrangement may not be present, in certain circumstances. When a nozzle with a vortex chamber is used (not shown in the drawings), contrary to what was stated above, it is expedient if the powder cavity (1) itself forms a vortex chamber, i.e. has a circular diameter, for example, preferably with a flat bottom, and the stream of propellant enters close to the edge of the powder cavity (1). The outlet of the nozzle is then located centrally above the powder cavity (1). Tests with vortex chambers of this kind were also carried out in this way using the test device described herein, but with the comparatively large amounts of powder measured here, because of high residues in the powder cavities, the tests yielded worse nebulisation results (emptying levels of only 60%) than the nozzle arrangements described in more detail with reference to
(53) After leaving the nozzle (3) the powder is carried along by the air flow in the mouthpiece (2). In laboratory measurements with the test device, this air flow, which is produced in the inhaler by the patient's inward breath, is reproduced by a flow generating system. In both cases an air flow in the mouthpiece (2) is produced by an intake of air at the end of the mouthpiece (2) as a result of air being able to enter the mouthpiece (2) or the device through at least one inlet opening (2b) at an opposite point. Preferably, the inhaler or the test device comprises in the region of the nozzle (3) and mouthpiece (2) one or more channels connected to inlet openings (2b) which open into the mouthpiece (2) such that the air flowing through the channels envelops the stream of propellant leaving the nozzle (3) and thus carries the constituents along in a particularly suitable manner. In particular, these channels form a bypass to the nozzle. The aerodynamic diameter of this bypassparticularly at its narrowest pointdetermines the inspiration resistance experienced by a patient when inhaling from an inhaler of analogous construction.
(54) The test device was used to carry out measurements in which an intake of air with flow rates of 30, 60 and 90 liters per minute was applied to the mouthpiece (2), thereby reproducing different breathing characteristics of patients. (30 liters per minute is the rate specified in the European Pharmacopoeia for the aerodynamic evaluation of metered-dose aerosols, while 90 liters per minute correspond to a negative pressure of 4 kilopascals in a passive powder inhaler.) The FPD results showed that for this nebulisation concept (delivery of dry powder through a straight, elongate nozzle channel by means of propellant dried in a vaporiser) the nebulisation showed no appreciable dependency on the breathing behaviour (even without pulsing of the propellant). Based on the total amount of active substance expelled from the nebuliser, at a flow rate of 30 liters per minute, rather greater deposits were found in the entry region of the attached measuring device (this entry region corresponds, with some limitations, to the oro-pharyngeal cavity of a patient when these measured results are applied to the use of an inhaler). At the flow rates of 60 and 90 liters per minute, the nebulisation characteristics showed no significant difference in terms of the total amount of active substance expelled. These higher flow rates are clearly better suited to picking up even the larger particles of the aerosol. In all, the nebulisation data for the concept proposed here show a significantly lower flow rate dependency than most commercially obtainable powder inhalers.
(55) Preferably, as shown in
(56) Preferably, the opening of the mouth tube (2) at the site of the outlet of the nozzle is significantly greater than the opening of the nozzle outlet, preferably at least 5 times as great, in relation to the diameter. This favours the aerodynamics in the mouth tube.
(57) Preferably, the mouthpiece (2) at the said end is longer than the inserted nozzle (3). With varying lengths (2l) of the mouthpiece (2) from a total of 15 to 120 millimeters, it was found (for a fixed shorter length of the nozzle (3) of preferably not more than 15 millimeters) that with the shorter mouthpieces there were certainly smaller deposits of formulation on the wall of the passage (2a), but on the other hand, with the longer mouthpieces, the nebulisation mist had better aerodynamics. With the longer mouthpieces (2) (particularly those with a length (2l) of 120 millimeters) measurements showed an increase in the fine particle dose (FPD). Presumably, the flow in the mouth tube leads to favourable deceleration of the particles accelerated by the propellant gas, so that when a nebuliser of this kind is used there is an increase in the possible deposition of these particles in the patient's lungs.
(58) With these two competing effects (formation of deposits inside the mouthpiece (2) and increase in the fine particle content of the aerosol) a preferred length range for the mouthpiece (2) is obtained, namely 30 to 90 millimeters, particularly preferably 60 to 90 millimeters, or a projection of the mouthpiece (2) beyond the end of the nozzle (3) by 20 to 70 millimeters, particularly preferably by 40 millimeters.
(59) In the embodiment of the test device shown the nozzle (3) is inserted in the connector (4) so as to be sealed off by a seal inserted in the crimp (3f) such that no bypass flows can occur outside the nozzle (3) into the powder cavity (1). The length of the nozzle channel and the length (3l) of the central cylindrical part of the nozzle channel (3a) are important functional parameters of the nozzle (3) as shown in
(60) The speed in the nozzle is dependent on the aerodynamic cross-section of the nozzle (3). With a smaller cross-section of the nozzle channel (3a) the flow resistance of the nozzle increases and the breaking up of the particles of formulation is increased. This has been demonstrated by the results of measurements (without pulsing of propellant) with different cross-sections of nozzle channels (3a). Cross-sections ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 square millimeters were tested (e.g. variation of a circular diameter in the range from 0.5 to 1 millimeter)cross-sections ranging from 0.4 to 0.7 square millimeters for the nozzle channel (3a) are preferred, according to the results of the measurements. For these measurements, the ratio of fine particle dose (FPD) to the total amount of active substance expelled from the nebuliser was evaluated. This ratio increased as the cross-section became smaller. By using smaller diameters for the nozzle channel (3a) and hence smaller cross-sectional areas, a higher shear gradient can be obtained. This acts with greater force on the particles that are to be nebulised, so that the fine particle content of the aerosol is increased. By way of example, a measurement of this kind was also carried out with a nozzle channel (3a) having an oval rather than a round cross-section. With the same cross-sectional area, in measurements with the oval nozzle channel, an FPD value comparable to that of the round nozzle channel was obtained, and the emptying of the powder cavity was increased when using the oval channel.
(61) Further measurements (without pulsed propellant) with different nozzle channels (3a) show a further effect, besides the improved break-up of particles at small cross-sections of the nozzle channels (3a). The entire quantity of formulation expelled from the nebuliser shows a particular dependency on the cross-section of the nozzle channel (3a). It exhibits the lowest value by comparison (62% in the actual measuring series, based on the quantity of formulation introduced into the powder cavity (1)), at a cross-sectional area of 0.2 square millimeters, while a significantly higher value (73%) is obtained at 0.4 square millimeters, which initially increases slightly at even larger cross-sections (76% at 0.5 square millimeters) and then tends to decrease slightly once more (73% at 0.8 square millimeters). When nozzles (3) with very narrow nozzle channels (3a) are used, less powder is expelled from the system, and instead more powder is left behind in the powder cavity (1).
(62) In order, nevertheless, to promote emptying even at small diameters of the nozzle channel (3a), an inlet cone (3b) is provided in front of the nozzle channel (3a) to assist the entry of the powder. As the aerosol reaches a speed in the nozzle channel (3a) which is many times higher than the flow rate applied in the mouthpiece (2), there is additionally an outlet cone (3c) at the end of the nozzle (3), in order to reduce any turbulence occurring during expulsion. Measurements taken by way of example furthermore indicate that the entire quantity of formulation expelled from the nebuliser is increased by the use of oval cross-sections. However, it was all the more possible to counteract the effect that the emptying from the powder cavity (1) deteriorates on transition to the smaller nozzle channels (3a) by pulsing the propellant. Particularly at diameters of the nozzle channel (3a) of only 0.5 millimeters, good deliveries were achieved by using pulsed jets of propellant (for example, 92.5% expulsion of 75 milligrams of a powder mixture containing 98% fenoterol from a tub-shaped powder cavity (1), achieving 16.5 milligrams of fenoterol as the actual fine particle content). By dividing a jet of propellant into a number of short bursts or pulses, it is thus possible on the one hand to obtain a high inhalable fine particle content with each pulse (using small cross-sections for the nozzle channel (3a)) and also on the other hand to achieve efficient emptying of the powder cavity by the cumulative effect of the pulses. This is certainly the case for powder cavities (1) with a trough-shaped well (1a) as shown in
(63)
(64) At the powder removal position, the opened blister cavity (101) is brought close up to, or pressed against, the connector which comprises the propellant supply line and the inlet of the nozzle channel (3a). For example, the wheel (111) and the blister strip (100) are oriented at this point such that the blister cavity (101) is pressed or forced against the connector. The receptacles (111b) on the wheel (111) are embodied such that the top of the blister cavity (101) has the same convexity as the associated underside of the connectorpreferably, the blister cavity (101) lies completely flat on the wheel (111) and is not domed. Preferably, the connector contains materials which in particular seal the upper outer edge of the opened blister cavity (101) against the connector, such as a Teflon coating or a sealing ring set into the contact surface.
(65) In addition, pressure is preferably applied to the rotation spindle (111a) of the wheel (111) by a spring or the like, so that the wheel (111) is pressed towards the connector and in this way the seal is ensured. As an alternative to the wheel (111), a preferably spring-loaded guide rail may be used. By means of tensile force on the reel (112) first of all the blister cavity (101) is brought into its position on the connector and then pressed on by this guide rail. Depending on the configuration of the blister strip (100) the guide rail may have a smooth surface (in which case it is then also suitable for guiding the blister strip as it advances in the device) or a movable pressure plate with a receptacle (this plate does not come into contact with the blister strip (100) as the latter advances).
(66) In one embodiment of the nebuliser according to the invention the mechanism for pulling off the cover film (103) preferably corresponds to the corresponding mechanism which is disclosed in the specification DE4106379A1. The corresponding content is hereby fully incorporated by reference in the present application. A further development of this transporting mechanism can be found in EP1436216B1.
(67) Preferably, the advance of the blister strip (100) is achieved by moving the cover (20), preferably by the opening action. For this purpose the rotation spindle (21) is preferably coupled to the reel (112), so that when the device is opened the blister strip (100) is pulled in the direction of advance and at the same time the wheel (111) rotates. In this coupling, a kind of non-return barrier is provided for example in the form of a friction clutch such that the rotary movement of the spindle (21) is only transmitted to the reel (112) in one direction (preferably the direction of opening). In addition, the rotation spindle (21) and/or the reel (112) is or are optionally coupled via a transmission (not shown in
(68) The non-return barrier in relation to the transmission of the rotary movement of the rotation spindle (21) and the spindle (111a) of the wheel (111) and/or the reels (112, 113) may furthermore be configured similarly to the non-return barrier disclosed in the specification WO07068896. The respective disclosure is hereby fully incorporated by reference herein.
(69) Alternative Electrical Actuation of Advance
(70) As an alternative to pulling off the cover film (103) and using an associated reel (113), before they reach the powder removal position the blister cavities (101) may also be moved past a different kind of opening device at which the cover film (103) is for example pierced or cut open or otherwise opened at the location of the blister cavity (101).
(71) Preferably, the inhaler is configured such that the blister strip (100), the wheel (111) and the reels (112, 113) and any transmission elements acting between them are located in an exchangeable housing part (19a). As a result, the size of the inhaler is not determined by the length of the blister strip (100), i.e. it is not determined by the maximum possible number of doses.
(72) In order to expel the powder from the blister cavity (101) which has been brought into the powder removal position, propellant is released from the cartridge (5). This can either be achieved by the user or patient pressing directly on the cartridge (5) in the direction of its valve stem (7), which in this case is preferably spring-loaded, (application of pressure to the cartridge base on the opposite side from the valve stem (7)) or by the patient triggering a corresponding movement of the cartridge (5) and/or the pulse sequence on a built-in magnetic valve by breathing in through the mouthpiece (2).
(73) A so-called breath actuation of this kind is provided in the device shown in
(74)
(75) Such a combination of the biasing of a propellant cartridge and a breath actuation is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,610. The corresponding content is hereby fully incorporated by reference in the present application. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,610 the biasing of the cartridge and the provision of the breath actuation is brought about by the removal and replacement of a cap on the mouthpiece. In an embodiment that is preferred here the mechanism from U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,610 would instead be coupled to the pivoting movement of the cover (20) or to an additional lever (not shown).
(76) As an alternative to a mechanical breath actuation of this kind, an electromechanical control may also be used. In embodiments of this kind with electromagnetic control (not shown) the nebuliser preferably has a battery which provides the electric voltage needed for such controls. In electrical or electromechanical breath actuation of this kind, the nebuliser comprises on the inside of the mouthpiece (2) an electrical flow sensor which emits an electrical signal that varies with the flow rate, in accordance with the flow detected. This signal is then used to start an electromechanical process by which, for example, the cartridge (5) is moved in the direction of the valve stem receptacle (8a), the valve of the cartridge (5) is opened and in this way propellant is released into the vaporiser (6) or the channels of the nebuliser. In order that this valve actuation only takes place at a predefined air flow, i.e. a specific suction on the mouthpiece (2), the sensor signal is first passed through a monitoring device, for example an analogue comparator circuit or digital electronics. The sensor signal to some extent triggers an electric switch when a specific suction is obtained at the mouthpiece (2). When this electric switch is actuated an electromechanical process is started, for example a stepping motor is started up which moves the cartridge along. Electromechanical breath-actuated triggering of nebulisers with propellant cartridges is disclosed in the specification WO9207599A1. The corresponding content relating to such actuation is hereby fully incorporated by reference in the present application.
(77) One possible way of introducing breath actuation into the nebuliser, which is independent of the movement of the cartridge, consists in providing a second valve in addition to the valve belonging to the cartridge (5) (preferably where there is no intention of using a magnetic valve actuated by an electronic pulse generator as in
(78) Preferably, the nebulisers described here are operated with a medicinal formulation which comprises a constituent from the disclosure of the European Patent Application with the application Ser. No. 12/151,105.9 on page 26 line 12 to page 63 line 2 or corresponds to one of the formulations mentioned therein. The content of these lines is hereby fully incorporated by reference, including the features, in the present application.
LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
(79) 1 powder cavity 1a well (in powder cavity) 1b sealing groove 1c slope (in powder cavity) 1d flattened area (in powder cavity) 1t carrier (of powder cavity) 2 mouthpiece 2a passage (at the mouthpiece) 2b inlet opening (at the mouthpiece) 2l length (of the mouthpiece) 3 nozzle 3a nozzle channel 3b inlet cone (of the nozzle) 3c outlet cone (of the nozzle) 3d end face (of the nozzle) 3g connecting end (of the nozzle) 3f crimp 3l length (of the cylindrical part of the nozzle channel) 4 connector 5 cartridge 6 vaporiser 7 valve stem 8 cover (on the vaporiser) 8a valve stem receptacle (in the cover) 8b flange (on the cover) 8c crimp (in the flange) 8d inner cone (on the cover) 9 body (of the vaporiser) 9a cavity (of the vaporiser) 9b funnel 9c outlet (of the vaporiser) 9d stem (on the vaporiser) 10 seal 11 bead 12 wire 13 magnetic valve 14 flange plate 15 microfluidic oscillator 15a inlet channel (at the microfluidic oscillator) 15b partial channels 15c internal walls (of the partial channels) 15d mixing region 15e projections in the mixing region 15f outlet (from mixing region of the microfluidic oscillator) 15t flow distributor 15v ventilation channel 19 housing 19a replaceable housing part 20 cover (for mouthpiece) 21 rotation spindle (for cover) 22 lug 23 bypass 100 blister strip 101 blister cavity 102 carrier web 103 cover film 111 wheel 111a rotation spindle (on wheel) 111b receptacle (on wheel) 112 reel (for carrier web) 113 reel (for cover film) inlet angle (on nozzle) outlet angle (on nozzle) A aerosol G pulse generator I nebuliser K propellant gas cartridge Q source (gas) R(p) pressure regulator R(F) flow regulator V magnetic valve WT heat exchanger