Metal supported solid oxide fuel cell
10008726 ยท 2018-06-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01M4/9033
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8803
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/8889
ELECTRICITY
H01M4/9025
ELECTRICITY
Y02E60/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H01M4/8621
ELECTRICITY
H01M8/1213
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H01M4/86
ELECTRICITY
H01M8/1213
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A process for forming a metal supported solid oxide fuel cell, the process comprising the steps of: a) applying a green anode layer including nickel oxide, copper oxide and a rare earth-doped ceria to a metal substrate; b) firing the green anode layer to form a composite including oxides of nickel, copper, and a rare earth-doped ceria; c) providing an electrolyte; and d) providing a cathode. Metal supported solid oxide fuel cells comprising an anode a cathode and an electrolyte, wherein the anode includes nickel, copper and a rare earth-doped ceria, fuel cell stacks and uses of these fuel cells.
Claims
1. A metal supported solid oxide fuel cell, comprising: (i) a ferritic stainless steel support including a porous region and a non-porous region bounding the porous region; (ii) a ferritic stainless steel bi-polar plate located under one surface of the porous region of the support and being sealingly attached to the non-porous region of the support about the porous region thereof; (iii) an anode comprising an anode layer located over the other surface of the porous region of the support; (iv) an electrolyte comprising an electrolyte layer located over the anode layer; and (v) a cathode comprising a cathode layer located over the electrolyte layer; wherein the anode includes nickel, copper and a rare earth-doped ceria; wherein the copper is in a copper oxide selected from copper (II) oxide, copper (I) oxide, a nickel-copper oxide and combinations thereof; wherein the anode comprises metal oxides; and wherein the copper oxide is present in the range around 8 to 12 wt % of the total metal oxide content.
2. The fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the nickel, copper and rare earth-doped ceria are sintered.
3. The fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the nickel is in a form selected from metallic nickel, nickel oxide, a nickel-copper alloy, a nickel-copper oxide and combinations thereof.
4. The fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the rare earth-doped ceria comprises gadolinium doped cerium oxide.
5. A fuel cell stack comprising two or more fuel cells according to claim 1.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, it will be described further with reference to the figures and to the specific examples hereinafter.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) A SOFC 10 as described in GB 2 368 450 is shown schematically in
(11) SOFC 10 of
(12)
EXAMPLES
(13) Anode Structure
(14)
(15) Good sintering is evidenced by a clear distinction between ceramic and metallic regions, and by the particles of both ceramic and metallic phases having fused together. The ceramic regions appearing as light regions and the metallic regions as dark patches. As can be seen, the composite of
(16) The resulting anode structure has been demonstrated to be highly REDOX-stable at operating temperatures of <650? C., being capable of withstanding hundreds of high-temperature fuel interruptions without significant cell performance degradation.
(17) Selection of Copper
(18) A range of cations are known to enhance doped ceria sintering, these include copper, cobalt, iron, manganese and lithium (U.S. Pat. No. 6,709,628, J. D. Nicholas and L. C. De Jonghe, Solid State Ionics, 178 (2007), 1187-1194). Consideration was therefore given to doping the rare earth-doped ceria with one of these cations. Of the above cations, copper, cobalt and lithium are reported to the most effective at enhancing the sintering of rare earth-doped ceria. Copper and cobalt are the only cations considered by the applicant to be suitable for use in an SOFC anode as lithium oxide is highly reactive, and in addition is known to be very detrimental to the ionic conductivity of rare earth-doped ceria by forming an insulating phase on the grain boundaries. Cobalt is well known to enhance the sintering of rare earth-doped ceria, and in addition is known to be effective as an anode catalyst (C. M. Grgicak, R. C. Green and J. B. Giorgi, J. Power Sources, 179(1), 2008, 317-328), although typically less so than nickel. However initial evaluation of the sintering behaviour of composites using a push-rod dilatometer surprisingly demonstrated that cobalt oxide is ineffective in enhancing the sintering of nickel oxide, and thus the sinterability of the anode composite was not significantly enhanced by the partial or even complete substitution of nickel oxide with cobalt oxide. Copper oxide by contrast demonstrated a great increase in the sinterability of the composite, partly it is suspected because it may form a low melting-point eutectic with nickel oxide, thus introducing some liquid-phase sintering.
(19) Fuel Cell Performance
(20)
(21)
(22) It can be seen from
(23) Enhanced Mechanical Strength of Anode Resulting from Copper Addition
(24)
(25) In the as-manufactured cells, the anodes are in the oxidised state and prior to the mechanical test they are reduced in order to mimic the anode structure in the cell at the start of operating, whereas the anodes in the after operating cells are in the final cermet state of the working anodes.
(26) In order to perform the mechanical strength measurement on the cells, the metal substrates of the cells are first glued to a flat steel plate to prevent the cells flexing when a pulling force is applied. The cathodes of the cells are removed mechanically, exposing the electrolyte.
(27) To assess the mechanical strength of the anode and/or the anode-electrolyte bond, circular metal test pieces are glued to the electrolyte surface in the four corners of the electrolyte and the middle of the cell. A diamond scribe is used to cut through the ceramic layers of the cell around the metal test piece. A calibrated hydraulic puller is then attached to the test piece and used to measure the stress required to pull the test piece off the cell substrate. A maximum pulling stress of 17 MPa may be applied using this technique, after which the glue holding the test piece to the electrolyte tends to fail rather than the fuel cell layers on test. Should the test piece be pulled off at less than 17 MPa this indicates the failure stress of the weakest cell layer (usually the internal structure of the anode).
(28) It can be seen that whilst the standard nickel-CGO anodes are strong in the as-manufactured state, they fail at much lower stresses after reduction of the nickel oxide to metallic nickel in the after operating cell. Without being bound by theory, it is believed this is largely because of the lack of a contiguous ceramic structure within the anode, meaning the mechanical strength of the anode is provided entirely by relatively weak necks between nickel particles. By contrast it can be seen that the nickel-copper CGO anodes retain their strength after reduction to the cermet structure, indicating much greater sintering of both metallic and ceramic phases.
(29) It should be appreciated that the processes and fuel cell of the invention are capable of being incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which have been illustrated and described above.