Lip/Cheek Retainer And System
20230094777 · 2023-03-30
Inventors
- Markus Lichtensteiger (Montlingen, CH)
- Wolfgang Wachter (Schaan, LI)
- Lukas Enggist (Sargans, CH)
- Frank Müller (Feldkirch, AT)
Cpc classification
A61C5/90
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61B1/24
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A lip/cheek retainer particularly suitable for use with an intraoral scanner is provided, having a film made from an elastomer, a lip ring and a vestibular ring, with the film extending between the lip ring and the vestibular ring, being held taut by these and forming a tubular section between them. It is provided that the film (20) is prefabricated on the inner side (32) of its tubular section with a sliding element (36), in particular altering the surface of the film (20) there, produced by a surface treatment and firmly bonded to the film (20), with a sliding friction coefficient μG of less than 1.5, preferably less than 1.
Claims
1. A lip/cheek retainer comprising a film made from an elastomer, a lip ring and a vestibular ring, with the film extending between the lip ring and the vestibular ring, being held taut by the rings and forming a tubular section between the rings, wherein the film (20) is provided on an inner side (32) of the tubular section with a sliding element (36), firmly bonded to the film (20), produced by a surface treatment which alters the surface of the film (20) at the sliding element.
2. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the surface treatment alters the surface of the film (20) with a coefficient of sliding friction μG of less than 1.5 or less than 1.0.
3. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 2, wherein a size specification of the sliding friction coefficient μG of the sliding element (36) refers to material pairing film/shape-retaining plastic or film/metal.
4. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 2, wherein the sliding element (36), in order to provide the coefficient of sliding friction, has a coating of SiO.sub.2 firmly bonded to the film (20).
5. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 2, wherein the sliding element (36) is produced by a combination of atomic deposition and surface modification, or surface texturing.
6. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 2, wherein the sliding element (36), in order to provide the coefficient of sliding friction, comprises a coating of para-xylylene firmly bonded to the film (20).
7. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 2, wherein the sliding element (36), in order to provide the coefficient of sliding friction, has a microstructure (48) produced by injection moulding and having peaks (42) comprising projecting regions and valleys (44) comprising recessed regions, the peaks (42) of which are harder than the film (20) and occupy less than 30% of a surface of the sliding element (20).
8. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element (36) has contact regions (46), the size of each of which lies between an atomic range and a few μm and is uniformly distributed over the sliding element (36).
9. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 8, wherein the sliding element (36), in order to provide the coefficient of sliding friction, has a microstructure (48) having peaks (42) comprising projecting regions or protruding regions which form the contact regions (46).
10. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 9, wherein contact areas (46) of the sliding element remain unchanged or substantially unchanged by more than 80%, when the film (20) is stretched and the stretching increases the distances between the contact areas (46).
11. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 8, wherein the sliding element (36) extends over the entire inner side (32) of the tubular section of the film (20).
12. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the film (20) in a stretched state has a constriction between the lip ring and the vestibular ring and that the sliding element (36) extends over the inner side of the tubular section of the film only in the region of the constriction at a distance from the rings.
13. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element (36) has a thickness of between 2 μm and 200 μm, or between 5 to 150 μm.
14. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element (36) is applied to and firmly bonded to the film (20).
15. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element (36) has an elasticity lower than an elasticity of the film (20) and a hardness higher than a hardness of the film.
16. The lip/cheek retainer according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element (36) is water-repellent.
17. A system comprising an intraoral scanner and a lip/cheek retainer, wherein the intraoral scanner comprises an outer housing made of plastic and/or metal and wherein the lip/cheek retainer comprises a lip ring, a vestibular ring and a film made from an elastomer, which extends between the lip ring and the vestibular ring, which film is held taut by the rings and forms a tubular section between the rings, wherein the film (20) is provided on an inner side (32) of the tubular section with a sliding element (36), firmly bonded to the film (20), which sliding element is produced by a surface treatment, which alters the surface of the film (20) at the sliding element.
18. The system according to claim 17, wherein film is altered by the surface treatment with a sliding friction coefficient μG of less than 1.5, relative to the shaft (16) of the intraoral scanner.
19. The system according to claim 17, wherein film is altered by the surface treatment with a sliding friction coefficient μG of less than 1.0, relative to the shaft (16) of the intraoral scanner.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0043] Further advantages, details and features will be apparent from the following description of several embodiments of the invention with reference to the drawings.
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0049]
[0050] The lip/cheek retainer 12 according to the invention comprises a film 20 and a lip ring 22 and a vestibular ring 24. The film 20 extends between the lip ring 22 and the vestibular ring 24, thus forming a tubular section between the rings. The vestibular ring 24 has a slightly smaller diameter than the lip ring 22 and is designed to be inserted into a patient's vestibule 26. When stretched, the lip/cheek retainer 12 has a constriction between the lip ring 22 and the vestibular ring 24.
[0051] The film 20 covers the patient's lower lip 28 and upper lip 30 in a manner known per se and prevents direct contact between the lips 28 and 30 and the shaft 16, even when the patient closes his lips around the shaft 16.
[0052] The film 20 has an inner side 32 and an outer side 34, the inner side 32 being the side facing the shaft 16 and the outer side 34 being the side facing the lips 28 and 30.
[0053] According to the invention, the inner side 32 of the film 20 is provided with a sliding element 36. The sliding element 36 has been produced by a surface treatment of the film 20, more specifically the inner side 32 of the film, and has a low coefficient of sliding friction of 1.
[0054] The sliding element 36 extends over the inner side 32 of the tubular section of the film 20 only in the area of the constriction, i.e. distanced from the rings.
[0055] In the illustrated embodiment, the film 20 has a thickness of 0.2 mm. The sliding element 36 has a thickness in the atomic range or slightly above the atomic range. The sliding element 36 is created so that it is firmly anchored to the film. In the illustrated embodiment example according to
[0056]
[0057] The sliding element 36 according to the invention ensures that no stick-slip effect occurs, but rather a uniform sliding between the shaft 16 and the lip/cheek retainer 12 occurs during movement in direction 40. The difference between static friction and sliding friction is correspondingly small.
[0058]
[0059] The coefficient of sliding friction averages between 0.9 and 1.2, with some variation. Examples of surfaces for sliding components along with coefficients of sliding friction between components are set forth in U.S. Ser. No. 10/492,557 and 20160201005, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. More ranges may include, but are not limited to, 0.4 to 1.4, 0.5 to 1.1, and 0.6 to 1.0.
[0060] A further modified embodiment of a lip/cheek retainer 12 according to the invention is shown in
[0061] Only the peaks form contact areas 46. The contact areas 46 of the sliding element 36 remain unchanged or substantially unchanged, i.e., more than 80%, when the film 20 is stretched, and the stretching increases the distances between the contact areas 46.
[0062] The peaks 42 are evenly distributed over the surface of the sliding element 36. The size of the peaks 42, i.e., the thickness of the microstructure 48 can be chosen in any suitable manner, for example between the atomic range and a few micrometres. The microstructure 48 can be moulded in negative form into the surface of an injection mould, and the injection moulding then automatically produces the microstructure 48 of the sliding element 36.
[0063] A further modified embodiment of a lip/cheek retainer 12 according to the invention is shown in
[0064] Tests were carried out on static friction and sliding friction with polysulfone as the friction partner. Polysulfone was chosen because the shaft 16 of intraoral scanners 10 is often made of polysulfone. The contact pressure was varied between 1 and 5 N. The speed of movement during the sliding friction measurement was about 6 mm/s.
[0065] The microstructure was also measured. Furthermore, the microstructure size was changed between grid masses 50 μm and 200 μm and pyramid height between 24 μm and 87 μm.
[0066] The coefficient of friction was reduced by between 22 and 25%, or by 37% for a different experimental arrangement, depending on the contact pressure compared with an elastomeric strip, at the maximum microstructure size tested.
[0067] A considerably larger range of variation was found in a comparative measurement with a siloxane coating instead of microstructure 48. The reduction in the coefficient of friction then varied between 21 and 49% depending on the contact pressure.
[0068] It is important to note that the difference between the coefficient of static friction and the coefficient of dynamic friction was smaller with the design according to the invention than with an uncoated and untreated elastomer film.
[0069] This effect is sufficient to avoid the stick-slip effect. The embodiments according to the invention have the particular advantage that there is a comparatively small difference between the coefficient of static friction and the coefficient of dynamic friction. Measurements have shown that an uncoated and untreated elastomer film such as a standard elastomer has a coefficient of static friction of about 3.5 to 4 and a coefficient of dynamic friction of about 2.5.