METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION AND CONCENTRATION OF NANOPARTICULATE MERCURY IN NATURAL SOILS

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for simultaneous determination of particle size distribution, concentrations of nanoparticulate mercury (Hg-NPs) in natural soils. The method uses sodium pyrophosphate as the extractant, and allows quick extraction of Hg-NPs in the soil without dissolution or aggregation. In combination with spICP-MS determination, the method makes it possible to simultaneously determine the particle size distribution and concentration of Hg-NPs in the complex soil matrix, with accurate determination results.

Claims

1. A method for simultaneous determination of particle size distribution and concentration of nanoparticulate mercury in natural soils, comprising mixing a soil sample with a sodium pyrophosphate solution (TSPP) and subjecting the resulting mixture to an extraction to obtain a soil mixture; leaving the soil mixture for a sedimentation and collecting a supernatant for testing; and testing the supernatant using single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) to simultaneously obtain the particle size distribution and concentration of nanoparticulate mercury in the soil sample; wherein the mixing includes a first vortex treatment and a shaking treatment performed in sequence; the extraction includes an ultrasonic treatment and a second vortex treatment performed in sequence.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a ratio of the soil sample to sodium pyrophosphate is in the range of (0.495-0.505) g: 0.1 mmol.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the soil sample is able to pass through a 100-mesh screen.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sodium pyrophosphate solution is at a concentration of 10 mmol/L.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first vortex treatment is performed at a rotation speed of 2000-2500 rpm for 10-15 s.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the shaking treatment is performed at a temperature of 24.5-25.5° C. and a rotation speed of 190-210 rpm for 30-70 min.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ultrasonic treatment is performed with an ultrasonic frequency of 40-50 kHz for 14-16 min.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second vortex treatment is performed at a rotation speed of 2000-2500 rpm for 10-15 s.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the soil mixture is left to sediment for 2-3 h.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein parameters of the single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry are shown as follows: TABLE-US-00002 radio frequency power: 1600 W radio frequency matching: 1.84 V nebulizer gas flow rate: 1 L/min nebulizer pump rotation speed: 0.1 rps plasma gas flow rate: 15 L/min transport efficiency: 4-6% sample flow rate: 0.25-0.35 mL/min dwell time: 3 ms acquisition time: 60-120 s

11. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the soil sample is able to pass through a 100-mesh screen.

12. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the sodium pyrophosphate solution has a concentration of 10 mmol/L.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0031] The features of the invention believed to be novel and the elements characteristic of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The figures are for illustration purposes only and are not drawn to scale. The invention itself, however, both as to organization and method of operation, may best be understood by reference to the detailed description which follows taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

[0032] FIG. 1 shows the particle size distribution of synthesized Hg-NPs obtained by spICP-MS;

[0033] FIG. 2 shows the particle size distribution of synthesized Hg-NPs obtained by TEM-EDS;

[0034] FIG. 3 shows the particle mass concentration of Hg-NPs in the Hg-NP standard solution measured by CVAFS and spICP-MS;

[0035] FIG. 4 shows the concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different extractants;

[0036] FIG. 5 shows the measured concentrations of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different shaking time;

[0037] FIG. 6 shows the measured concentrations of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different ultrasonic frequency;

[0038] FIG. 7 shows the measured concentrations of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different sedimentation time;

[0039] FIG. 8 shows the measured concentrations of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different ratios of soil to extractant;

[0040] FIG. 9 shows the concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different TSPP concentrations;

[0041] FIG. 10 shows the particle size of spiked Hg-NPs in soils before and after extraction;

[0042] FIG. 11 shows the concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs in different soils with a wide range of properties;

[0043] FIG. 12 shows the concentrations of indigenous Hg-NPs in soils H1, H2 and H3;

[0044] FIG. 13 shows the particle size distribution of indigenous Hg-NPs in soil H1;

[0045] FIG. 14 shows the particle size distribution of indigenous Hg-NPs in soil H2; and

[0046] FIG. 15 shows the particle size distribution of indigenous Hg-NPs in soil H3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0047] The method for simultaneous determination of the particle size distribution and concentration of Hg-NPs in natural soils according to the present disclosure is described in more detail by the examples below; however, these examples do not limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.

Example 1

Verification of Accuracy

[0048] An appropriate amount of synthesized Hg-NPs was weighed and dispersed in ultrapure water to obtain a standard suspension of Hg-NPs.

[0049] The standard suspension of Hg-NPs was subjected to spICP-MS determination and transmission electron microscope equipped with energy dispersive energy spectroscopy (TEM-EDS) determination, to obtain the particle size distribution. The results are shown in FIGS. 1-2. FIG. 1 shows the particle size distribution obtained by spICP-MS, and FIG. 2 shows the particle size distribution obtained by TEM-EDS. There is no significant difference between the particle size distribution of Hg-NPs measured by the two methods, indicating that the particle size distribution of Hg-NPs could be accurately determined by spICP-MS.

[0050] The mass concentration of Hg-NPs in the standard suspension of Hg-NPs was measured by cold-vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (“CVAFS”) and spICP-MS respectively. FIG. 3 shows that there is no significant difference between the results of mass concentration of Hg-NPs obtained by CVAFS and spICP-MS. This demonstrates that the mass concentration of Hg-NPs could be accurately determined by spICP-MS.

Example 2

2.1 Soil Aging

[0051] 0.5 g of air-dried soil, passing through a 100-mesh screen, was weighed and placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube.

[0052] 100 μL of ultrapure water was added into soil to serve as the control group. 100 μL of a standard suspension of Hg-NPs was spiked into the soil to serve as the experimental group. All groups were vortexed at 2000 rpm for 10 s and then aged at room temperature for 24 h, obtaining aged soil.

2.2 Effect of Different Extractants

[0053] (1) The aged soil obtained in 2.1 was sampled and extracted by different extractants, including 0.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate (TSPP) solution, 0.5 mM sodium thiosulfate (Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3) solution, 0.5 mM 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonic acid sodium salt (DMPS) solution and ultrapure water (H.sub.2O). 10 mL of the above extractants were added to the aged soil, and were mixed on a vortex instrument for 10 s (2000 rpm).

[0054] (2) The soil mixture obtained in step (1) was shaken at 200 rpm for 70 min (25° C.).

[0055] (3) The soil mixture obtained in step (2) was subjected to an ultrasonic treatment (40 kHz, 15 min), and then mixed on a vortex instrument at 2000 rpm for 10 s to obtain a soil mixture.

[0056] (4) The soil mixture obtained in step (3) was left to sediment for 2 h at room temperature to allow for the large soil particles settling down in the soil mixture.

[0057] (5) The supernatant (100 μL) obtained in step (4) was sampled, diluted with ultrapure water and subjected to spICP-MS analysis for Hg-NP quantification according to the parameters in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Parameters of the single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Instrument parameters Values Radio frequency power 1600 W Radio frequency matching 1.84 V Nebulizer gas flow rate 1 L/min Nebulizer pump rotation speed 0.1 rps Plasma gas flow rate 15 L/min Transport efficiency 4-6% Sample flow rate 0.25-0.35 mL/min Dwell time 3 ms Acquisition time 60-120 s

[0058] The concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs in soil using different extractants are shown in FIG. 4. The extraction efficiency is significantly influenced by different extractants. TSPP is the most efficient extractants as compared with others.

2.3 Effect of Different Shaking Time

[0059] (1) 20 mL of 2.5 mM TSPP solution was used to extract Hg-NPs in the aged soil obtained in 2.1. They were mixed on a vortex instrument for 10 s (2000 rpm).

[0060] (2) The soil mixture in step (1) was shaken at 200 rpm (25° C.) for 30 min or 70 min, respectively.

[0061] (3) The operation of step (3) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0062] (4) The operation of step (4) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0063] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0064] The results are shown in FIG. 5. The extraction efficiency is significantly influenced by different shaking time. Compared with the shaking time of 30 min, greater concentrations of Hg-NPs were obtained after shaking for 70 min.

2.4 Effect of Different Ultrasonic Frequencies

[0065] (1) The operation of step (1) in 2.3 was repeated.

[0066] (2) The operation of step (2) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0067] (3) The soil mixture obtained in step (2) was subjected to an ultrasonic treatment with a frequency of 40 kHz or 50 kHz for 15 min, and then mixed on a vortex instrument at 2000 rpm for 10 s.

[0068] (4) The operation of step (4) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0069] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0070] The results are shown in FIG. 6. The extraction efficiency is significantly influenced by different ultrasonic frequencies. Compared with the ultrasonic frequency of 50 kHz, greater concentrations of Hg-NPs were obtained at a frequency of 40 kHz.

[0071] 2.5 Effect of Different Sedimentation Time

[0072] (1) The operation of step (1) in 2.3 was repeated.

[0073] (2) The operation of step (2) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0074] (3) The operation of step (3) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0075] (4) The soil mixture obtained in step (3) was left to sediment for 2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 8 h at room temperature to allow for the large soil particles settling down in the soil mixture.

[0076] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0077] The results are shown in FIG. 7. The extraction efficiency is significantly influenced by different sedimentation time. The greatest concentration of Hg-NPs was obtained after sedimentation for 2 h.

2.6 Effect of Different Ratios of Soil to Extractant

[0078] (1) 10 mL, 20 mL, 30 mL and 40 mL of 2.5 mM TSPP solution were added to the aged soil in 2.1, corresponding to soil-to-extractant ratios (g:mL) of 1:20, 1:40, 1:60, and 1:80, respectively, and they were mixed on a vortex instrument for 10 s (2000 rpm).

[0079] (2) The operation of step (2) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0080] (3) The operation of step (3) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0081] (4) The operation of step (4) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0082] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0083] The results are shown in FIG. 8. The extraction efficiency is limitedly affected by different ratios of soil to extractant. In order to save raw materials, 10 mL of TSPP, corresponding to a ratio of 1:20, was finally selected for subsequent extraction.

2.7 Effect of TSPP Concentrations

[0084] (1) The aged soil in 2.1 was sampled and incubated with 10 mL of TSPP at different concentrations, including 0.05 mM, 0.5 mM, 2.5 mM, 10 mM, and 20 mM. They were mixed on a vortex instrument for 10 s (2000 rpm).

[0085] (2) The operation of step (2) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0086] (3) The operation of step (3) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0087] (4) The operation of step (4) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0088] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0089] The results are shown in FIG. 9. The extraction efficiency is significantly influenced by different TSPP concentrations. The greatest extraction efficiency (95-105%) was obtained at 10 mM TSPP.

[0090] The particle size of spiked Hg-NPs in soil before and after extraction using different extractants and different TSPP concentrations are shown in FIG. 10. Particle size of Hg-NPs did not change significantly after extraction.

2.8 Verification of the Method

[0091] (1) 10 mL of 10 mM TSPP solution was added to the aged soil obtained in 2.1, and then they were mixed on a vortex instrument at 2000 rpm for 10 s.

[0092] (2) The operation of step (2) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0093] (3) The operation of step (3) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0094] (4) The operation of step (4) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0095] (5) The operation of step (5) in 2.2 was repeated.

[0096] The concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs were calculated according to Equation 1:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Recovery}\mathrm{rate}=\frac{CE-CB}{\mathrm{CO}}\times 100\%& \left(\mathrm{Equation}1\right)\end{array}$

[0097] in which CE represents the measured mass/number concentration of spiked Hg-NPs in the experimental group, CB represents the measured mass/number concentration of indigenous Hg-NPs in the control group without Hg-NPs spiking, and CO represents the mass/number concentration of pristine Hg-NPs spiked into the soil.

[0098] The concentration recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs are examined in fourteen soil samples (soils L0-L10 and H1-H3) and shown in FIG. 11. FIG. 11 shows that the recovery rates of spiked Hg-NPs range from 75% to 120%. Fourteen soil samples have different physical and chemical properties, and three of them (H1-H3) are soils sourced from mercury mining areas. The above results show that the method could be applied to different soils.

[0099] In addition, the particle size distribution and concentration of indigenous Hg-NPs in soils H1, H2 and H3 could be obtained at the same time. The results are shown in FIGS. 12-15. FIGS. 12-15 show that the mass concentrations of indigenous Hg-NPs in soils H1, H2, and H3 are 1243.6±344.9, 1896.1±223.8 and 4346.6±189.2 μg/kg, respectively, and the particle number concentrations are (3.5±0.7)×10.sup.9, (9.5±1.1)×10.sup.9 and (1.6±0.2)×10.sup.10 particles/g, respectively. In these three soils, indigenous Hg-NPs has a median size of about 30 nm (32.1±2.7, 30.1±0.4 and 35.0±0.4 nm for soil H1, H2, and H3, respectively).

Example 3

Detection Limit of the Method

[0100] The particle size detection limit (SDL) of Hg-NPs by spICP-MS was calculated according to Equation 2:

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{SDL}={\left(\frac{6\times I_L}{\pi \times {10}^{-6}\times \rho \times S_m\times f_a}\right)}^{1/3}& \left(\mathrm{Equation}2\right)\end{array}$

[0101] In Equation 2, S.sub.m=S/(V.sub.s×η), I.sub.L represents the background signal (counts), p represents the density of HgS (g/cm.sup.3), f.sub.a represents the mass fraction of Hg in HgS, and S represents the sensitivity of the instrument to Hg (cps L/ng), V.sub.s represents the sample flow rate of spICP-MS (μL/s), and η represents the transport efficiency.

[0102] Therefore, the particle size detection limit of Hg-NPs measured by spICP-MS was 21 nm.

[0103] The limit of detection (LOD) of particle number concentration of Hg-NPs by spICP-MS was calculated according to Equation 3:

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{LOD}=\frac{3}{\eta \times V_s\times t_i}& \left(\mathrm{Equation}3\right)\end{array}$

[0104] In Equation 3, t.sub.i represents the acquisition time (s).

[0105] Therefore, the limit of detection of particle number concentration of Hg-NPs by spICP-MS was calculated to be 1.2×10.sup.5 particles/L.

[0106] The above are only the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be pointed out that for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the principle of the present disclosure, several improvements and modifications could be made, and these improvements and modifications should fall within the scope of the present disclosure.