Generation of nitrogen dioxide for use with burner-based exhaust replication system

Abstract

A method of using a burner-based exhaust replication system to generate exhaust that contains nitrogen dioxide (NO.sub.2). An example of such as system is a system used to test automotive exhaust aftertreatment devices. A fluid that decomposes to generate NO.sub.2 as one of its decomposition products is selected. The fluid is heated thereby generating NO.sub.2, with the amount and duration of heating is controlled to result in a desired decomposition extent of NO.sub.2 from the fluid. The fluid is then delivered to an exhaust stream of the system.

Claims

1. A method of using a burner-based exhaust replication system to generate exhaust that contains nitrogen dioxide (NO.sub.2), comprising: selecting a fluid that decomposes to generate NO.sub.2 as one of its decomposition products; heating the fluid, thereby generating NO.sub.2; wherein the amount and duration of heating is controlled to result in a desired decomposition extent of NO.sub.2; delivering the NO.sub.2 to an exhaust stream of the test system; and metering the fluid prior to the heating step, or metering the NO.sub.2 delivered to the exhaust stream, to provide a desired amount of NO.sub.2 into the exhaust stream.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid is nitric acid.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the heating step is performed in a decomposition reactor having a reduction catalyst.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the delivering step is performed using a heated conduit.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the desired amount of NO.sub.2 is a proportion of a NO.sub.2:NOx ratio.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising using nitrogen as a carrier gas for the fluid.

7. An improved burner-based exhaust replication system, the exhaust replication system having an exhaust line that carries an exhaust stream as output of the test system, the improvements comprising: a decomposition reactor, operable to receive a fluid that decomposes to generate NO.sub.2 as one of its decomposition products and to heat the fluid, thereby generating NO.sub.2; a controller operable to control the amount and duration of heating to result in a desired decomposition extent of NO.sub.2; a conduit for delivering the NO.sub.2 from the decomposition reactor to the exhaust stream of the test system; and a meter upstream or downstream the decomposition reactor, operable to provide a desired amount of NO.sub.2 into the exhaust stream.

8. The test system of claim 7, wherein an exhaust aftertreatment device is installed on the exhaust line for testing, and wherein the conduit delivers the NO.sub.2 upstream the exhaust aftertreatment device.

9. The test system of claim 8, wherein the meter is upstream of the decomposition reactor, and wherein the controller controls the duration of heating by controlling the meter and thereby the residence time of the fluid in the decomposition reactor.

10. The test system of claim 8, wherein the fluid is nitric acid.

11. The test system of claim 8, wherein the decomposition reactor has a reduction catalyst.

12. The test system of claim 8, wherein the conduit is heated.

13. The test system of claim 8, wherein the desired amount of NO.sub.2 is a proportion of a NO.sub.2:NOx ratio.

14. The test system of claim 8, wherein the decomposition reactor is further operable to receive nitrogen as a carrier gas for the fluid.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) A more complete understanding of the present embodiments and advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:

(2) FIG. 1 illustrates a burner-based test system for testing automotive exhaust aftertreatment devices, having an NO.sub.2 generation system in accordance with the invention.

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates a first embodiment of an NO.sub.2 generation system for producing NO.sub.2 in the exhaust stream of the test system of FIG. 1.

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of an NO.sub.2 generation system for producing NO.sub.2 in an exhaust stream of the test system of FIG. 1.

(5) FIG. 4 illustrates a variation of the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 3.

(6) FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate how the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 4 may be used to control NO.sub.2 generation by varying the flow rates of N.sub.2 and HNO.sub.3 into the decomposition reactor.

(7) FIG. 7 illustrates how the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 4 may be used to control NO.sub.2 generation by varying the residence time of HNO.sub.3 in the decomposition reactor.

(8) FIG. 8 illustrates the NO.sub.2:NO.sub.x ratio produced by the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 4 as a function of residence time within the decomposition reactor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(9) The following description is directed to a method for replicating automotive exhaust gas in a burner-based test system. The method produces NO.sub.2 (nitrogen dioxide), a gaseous air pollutant composed of nitrogen and oxygen and one of a group of related gases called nitrogen oxides, or NOx.

(10) The method provides for accurate generation and control of NO.sub.2 in a burner-based test system. This allows the test system to generate a desired NO.sub.2:NOx ratio within its exhaust stream. Typically, the method is used to generate NO.sub.2 for testing automotive exhaust aftertreatment devices, but it could be used for any “exhaust replication system” in which NO.sub.2 is needed as a component to replicate engine exhaust.

(11) For purposes of example, the NO.sub.2 production method is described in the context of use with a burner-based ECTO-Lab test system. As described in the Background, the ECTO-Lab test system is for aftertreatment testing, accommodating full-sized catalysts from light-duty gasoline engines to large, heavy-duty diesel and natural gas engines. It is a multi-fueled, burner-based system designed to replicate exhaust conditions generated by internal combustion engines. The ECTO-Lab system can simulate lean and stoichiometric exhaust gas conditions using gasoline, diesel, natural gas, or propane fuels. It meets testing requirements for a wide range of full-size aftertreatment catalysts and devices.

(12) However, the invention may be used with any burner-based automotive test system that requires nitrogen dioxide in its exhaust stream.

(13) FIG. 1 illustrates a burner-based test system suitable for use with the present invention. System 100 is designed to replicate engine exhaust in terms of temperature and flow rate. As described below, system 100 has a NO.sub.2 generation system 30, which is capable of providing a desired amount of NO.sub.2 into the exhaust stream.

(14) As stated in the Background, an example of such a system is the ECTO-Lab™ system, developed by Southwest Research Institute. Exhaust gas conditions are generated through computer control and allow various combinations of flow, temperature, exhaust component concentrations.

(15) A burner 112 combusts a hydrocarbon fuel, such as gasoline or natural gas, thereby producing an exhaust stream. A wide range of air-fuel ratios may be combusted. A blower 111 is used to produce a desired air flow into burner 112.

(16) A heat exchanger 113 allows the exhaust gas temperature delivered from system 100 to be controlled. A typical range of outlet temperatures for system 100 is 400 to 1200 degrees centigrade.

(17) An exhaust line 119 delivers the exhaust to an exhaust aftertreatment device 120 that is being tested. An oil injector allows oil to injected into the exhaust line 119. This feature of system 100 is significant for aging various aftertreatment devices. A secondary air injector allows an amount of fresh air to be injected into the exhaust line 119.

(18) In the example of this description, device 120 is a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. SCR catalyst testing is of particular interest because of the need to achieve a desired NO.sub.2:NOx ratio at the front face of the catalyst to simulate its use in a vehicle.

(19) A controller 130 allows system 100 to implement programmable aging cycles. Parameters affecting the exhaust flow and content, such as exhaust temperature, flow rate, combustion air-fuel ratio, secondary air injection, and oil injection, may be varied. Although not shown in FIG. 1, system 100 has appropriate valves, injectors, and other mechanisms for achieving these controls. Input lines for oil injection and secondary air injection are shown in FIG. 1, although not necessarily used for purposes of NO.sub.2 generation.

(20) Controller 130 may incorporate the various control features described below, or those features may be implemented with separate controllers.

(21) Most systems 100 have a modular design, which allows components to be added to the base burner and heat exchanger. The system 100 can be modified as desired to simulate stoichiometric or lean-burn multi-fuel engines, as well as to replicate full transient exhaust traces.

(22) FIG. 2 illustrates a first embodiment of an NO.sub.2 generation system for producing NO.sub.2 in an exhaust stream of test system 100. In this embodiment, NO.sub.2 is produced by combustion of burner 112.

(23) A reservoir 21 contains a fluid that produces NO.sub.2 when that fluid combusts. Using meter 25, a desired amount of this fluid is metered into burner 112, where it combusts along with the “normal” burner fuel. The NO.sub.2-producing fluid may be injected directly into the combustion zone of the burner.

(24) An example of an NO.sub.2-producing fluid is nitric acid. Nitric acid (HNO.sub.3) is known to decompose thermally or by light according to the equation 4HNO.sub.3.fwdarw.2H.sub.2O+4NO.sub.2+O.sub.2. The nitric acid may be used in an aqueous form to reduce any caustic effects on equipment and personnel.

(25) The decomposition extent and products may require precise temperature and O2 control, both of which can be integrated into a closed-loop control scheme of system 100.

(26) FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of an NO.sub.2 generation system 30 for producing NO.sub.2 in an exhaust stream of test system 100. In this method, NO.sub.2 is produced externally to system 100 and introduced into the exhaust stream of system 100, directly into exhaust line 119.

(27) A reservoir 27 stores an NO.sub.2-producing fluid, such as nitric acid. The NO.sub.2-producing fluid is delivered to a decomposition reactor 28 where it is heated to a desired temperature for a desired length of time to produce NO.sub.2. To increase the reaction rate, a decomposition catalyst, may be used within reactor 28. An inert surface area promoter, such as glass or ceramic Raschig rings, may be additionally or alternatively used.

(28) A controller 29 has a meter, such as a mass flow meter, to meter the flow of gaseous NO.sub.2 into the exhaust line 119 of system 100. The controller 29 may be installed on either side of reactor 28. Controller 29 also controls the temperature of the reactor 28. Control of the residence time of the NO.sub.2-producing fluid within reactor 28 may be controlled by metering the flow rate into reactor 28 as described below.

(29) The NO.sub.2 injection point may be anywhere downstream of burner 112 and upstream the aftertreatment device 120. Typically, the injection point will be a sufficient distance in front of device 120 to ensure mixing and therefore uniformity of NO.sub.2 within the exhaust mixture. If desired, the line 29a carrying the NO.sub.2 to the exhaust line 119 may be heated.

(30) FIG. 4 illustrates a variation of the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 3. In system 400, HNO.sub.3 and nitrogen (N.sub.2) are stored in respective reservoirs 41 and 42, respectively. The N.sub.2 is used as a carrier gas to help achieve steady and repeatable NO.sub.2 formation within decomposition reactor 45.

(31) Carrier gases other than nitrogen may be used, such as ambient air or carbon dioxide. Other suitable carrier gases are any non-radioactive noble gas, such as helium, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon.

(32) Both fluids have an associated meter, such as a mass flow meter, 41a and 42a, which meter the respective fluids to decomposition reactor 45. Reactor 45 comprises a heater and possibly a reduction catalyst and surface area promoter. As with system 30, a controller 49 controls the temperature of reactor 45. It also controls meters 41a and 41b to control the residence time of HNO.sub.3 and N.sub.2 within the reactor.

(33) FIG. 5 illustrates how system 400 may be used to control NO.sub.2 generation by varying the flow rates of N.sub.2 and HNO.sub.3 into reactor 45. Using meters 41a and 42b, the individual flow rates may be varied. In example experimentation, the sum of the HNO.sub.3 and N.sub.2 flow rates were maintained at a constant value of 36.0 1/min, and the individual flow rates were varied. The decomposition reactor 45 was maintained at a temperature of 550° C. Under these conditions, all nitric acid is decomposed. The flow rate of HNO.sub.3 may be varied to obtain a desired concentration of NO.sub.2 or a desired NO.sub.2:NOx ratio.

(34) FIG. 6 illustrates how decomposition is affected by lower temperatures of decomposition reactor 45. In the example experiment of FIG. 6, the decomposition reactor 45 was reduced to a temperature of 400° C. As in FIG. 5, a constant total flow of the sum of HNO.sub.3 and N.sub.2 was maintained at 36.0 1/min, and the HNO.sub.3 and N.sub.2 flow rates were individually varied. By reducing the temperature of the decomposition reactor 45, the NO.sub.2:NOx ratio can be increased to a value of >95%. The NO.sub.2 and NO+NO.sub.2 plots overlap. At lower temperatures, the NO.sub.2:NOx ratio has a larger controllable range into the exhaust stream, although there is also nitric acid slip into the exhaust.

(35) FIG. 7 illustrates how decomposition is affected by the residence time of HNO.sub.3 within decomposition reactor 45. In this example experiment, the flow rate of HNO.sub.3 was kept constant at 30.2 g/min and the N.sub.2 flow rate was progressively increased. The decomposition reactor 45 was maintained at 550° C. By increasing the N.sub.2 flow rate in such a manner, the residence time of HNO.sub.3 within the decomposition reactor 45 was progressively decreased and the effect on the NO.sub.2:NO.sub.x was quantified.

(36) FIG. 8 illustrates the NO.sub.2:NO.sub.x ratio produced by the NO.sub.2 generation system of FIG. 4 as a function of residence time within decomposition reactor 45. From these data, it is apparent that an increase in residence time of HNO.sub.3 within decomposition reactor 45 results in a reduced NO.sub.2:NO.sub.x ratio when the decomposition reactor was maintained at 550° C.

(37) The above-described data demonstrate that an appropriate decomposition reactor temperature and HNO.sub.3 residence time must be selected if a high NO.sub.2:NO.sub.x ratio is to be achieved while mitigating HNO.sub.3 breakthrough.

(38) Decomposition of nitric acid to NO.sub.2 and its other products may reach completion (100% conversion) at temperatures as low as 200° C. and 1 atm. If nitric acid is given sufficient decomposition time, complete decomposition may be possible at temperatures as low as 120 degrees C.

(39) Using the above-described methods, the test system is capable of achieving a desired NO.sub.2:NOx ratio at the front face of an exhaust aftertreatment device, such as an SCR catalyst. No oxidation catalyst is needed. An example of a suitable NO.sub.2:NOx ratio for testing an SCR catalyst is 0.5.