A PARTICLE SENSOR AND PARTICLE SENSING METHOD

Abstract

A particle sensor uses an electrostatic particle charging section in the form of an ionization chamber. A flow sensor arrangement is used to produce a signal which is representative of the amount of gas flow between the outside of the ionization chamber and the inside of the ionization chamber. This information is indicative of the flow conditions, and can be used to determine when adverse flow conditions are present which may adversely affect the performance or lifetime of the particle sensor.

Claims

1. A particle sensor, comprising: an input for receiving a gas flow with entrained particles; an electrostatic particle charging section comprising an ionization electrode within an ionization chamber, wherein the gas flow passes past the ionization chamber and partially enters the ionization chamber; a particle precipitation section; and a sensor unit for detecting the precipitated particles to produce a sensor signal, wherein the particle sensor comprises a sensor arrangement for producing a signal which is representative of the amount of gas flow between the outside of the ionization chamber and the inside of the ionization chamber.

2. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement comprises an arrangement of flow rate meters.

3. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 2, wherein the arrangement of flow meters comprises a first flow meter outside the ionization chamber in the vicinity of an inlet end or an outlet end of the particle charging section, and a second flow meter outside the ionization chamber in the vicinity of a tip of the ionization electrode.

4. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 3, wherein the second flow meter is between the inlet end of the particle charging section and the tip of the ionization electrode.

5. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement comprises an arrangement of pressure sensors.

6. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 5, wherein the arrangement of pressure sensors comprises a first pressure sensor inside the ionization chamber and a second pressure sensor outside the ionization chamber.

7. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 6, wherein the first pressure sensor is at the inlet end of the ionization chamber and the second pressure sensor is at the outlet end of the particle charging section.

8. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the precipitation section comprises a parallel-plate particle precipitation section.

9. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a non-metallic shield in the ionization chamber.

10. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a controller for controlling a drive level applied to the ionization electrode, wherein the controller is configured to select the drive level based on the signal.

11. A particle sensing method, comprising: receiving a gas flow with entrained particles; passing the gas flow through an electrostatic particle charging section comprising an ionization electrode within an ionization chamber, wherein the gas flow is provided past the ionization chamber but partially enters the ionization chamber; using a particle precipitation section to detect the charge of the precipitated particles to produce a sensor signal; and generating a signal which is representative of the amount of gas flow between the outside of the ionization chamber and the inside of the ionization chamber.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11, further comprising measuring a first flow rate outside the ionization chamber in a vicinity of an inlet end or an outlet end of the particle charging section, and measuring a second flow rate outside the ionization chamber in a vicinity of a tip of the ionization electrode, wherein the signal is based on the relative sizes of the first and second flow rates.

13. The method as claimed in claim 11, further comprising measuring a first pressure inside the ionization chamber and a second pressure sensor outside the ionization chamber, wherein the signal is based on the difference between the first and second pressures.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13, further comprising measuring the first pressure at the inlet end of the ionization chamber and measuring the second pressure at the outlet end of the particle charging section.

15. The method as claimed in claim 11, further comprising adjusting a drive signal to the ionization electrode in response to the signal.

16. The particle sensor as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a controller for controlling a flow rate through the particle sensor, wherein the flow rate is controlled based on the signal.

17. The method as claimed in claim 11, further comprising adjusting a flow rate through the particle sensor.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] Examples of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0043] FIG. 1 shows a first known example of a particle sensor;

[0044] FIG. 2 shows a second known example of a particle sensor;

[0045] FIG. 3 shows first flow conditions in and around the particle charging section;

[0046] FIG. 4 shows second flow conditions in and around the particle charging section;

[0047] FIG. 5 shows third flow conditions in and around the particle charging section;

[0048] FIG. 6 shows a first example of flow sensor arrangement which may be used to modify the sensor of FIG. 1 or 2; and

[0049] FIG. 7 shows a second example of flow sensor arrangement which may be used to modify the sensor of FIG. 1 or 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0050] The invention provides a particle sensor which uses an electrostatic particle charging section in the form of an ionization chamber. A flow sensor arrangement is used to produce a signal which is representative of the amount of gas flow between the outside of the ionization chamber and the inside of the ionization chamber. This information is indicative of the flow conditions, and can be used to determine when flow conditions are present which may adversely affect the performance or lifetime of the particle sensor.

[0051] The design and operation of known electrical ultra-fine particle (UFP) sensors will first be described in more detail. These sensors for example measure particles in the particle size range between approximately 10 nm and 500 nm. These sensors are for example used for the automatic control of air handling units in buildings or vehicle interiors, intended to supply fresh ventilation air while minimizing the indoor exposure to air pollutants.

[0052] The most basic sensor implementation is shown in FIG. 1.

[0053] The sensor comprises an inlet 10 for receiving air at a flow rate .sub.C.

[0054] A UFP charging section 12 comprises an air-ionizing high voltage ionization electrode 14 surrounded by a porous screen electrode 16.

[0055] Further downstream is a UFP precipitation section 18 comprising a Faraday cage 20 containing a particle filter that is capable of substantially filtering all airborne particles from the sampled airflow that passes through the UFP sensor.

[0056] A current meter 22 is connected to the Faraday cage. It measures the amount of particle-bound charge that deposits per unit time inside the Faraday cage as an electrical current I.sub.sensor. I.sub.sensor constitutes the sensor signal.

[0057] There is a means 24 for moving a sampled airflow comprising the airborne UFPs through the sensor. This can be a ventilator, fan, pump, or an ionic wind device. There is an air flow outlet 26 which expels air at the flow rate .sub.C.

[0058] The ionization is created by the high voltage V.sub.cor applied to the high voltage ionization electrode 14. The voltage is variable, under the control of a controller 27.

[0059] The inferred apparent UFP number concentration N.sub.app (as defined above) in the sampled airflow relates to the measured signal I.sub.sensor according to:

N.sub.app=SI.sub.sensor(1)

[0060] S is a calibration constant, which is substantially independent of the specifics of the particle size distribution and thus substantially independent of the count mean UFP diameter d.sub.p,av. Furthermore, the apparent particle number concentration N.sub.app is defined as:

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}{N}_{\mathrm{app}}=\frac{{\mathrm{Nd}}_{p,\mathrm{av}}}{d_{p,\mathrm{av}}^{*}}& \left(2\right)\end{array}$

[0061] N is the total UFP number concentration, d.sub.p,av is the count mean particle diameter, and d*.sub.p,av can be any pre-chosen default average particle diameter (usually d*.sub.p,av=50 nm).

[0062] Thus, N.sub.app is proportional to the product of N and d.sub.p,av. The product Nd.sub.p,av denotes the particle length concentration (m/m.sup.3). Knowledge of only N.sub.app is sufficient to assess the relative severity of the UFP-associated air pollution level. Separate knowledge of both N and d.sub.p,av is not required for that purpose.

[0063] Equation 2 is valid for an average UFP particle size range 25 nmd.sub.p,av120 nm. This range encompasses the typically encountered UFP size distributions throughout the UFP diameter range 10 nmd.sub.p500 nm.

[0064] Instead of the UFP sensor embodiment shown in FIG. 1, an alternative embodiment in FIG. 2 can be used.

[0065] The same reference numbers are used as in FIG. 1 for the same components. Instead of the Faraday cage 20, a parallel-plate electrostatic particle precipitator 30 is provided and the current meter 22 is attached to the plate electrode whereupon the charged particles are precipitated. The parallel-plate precipitator can, for example, be embodied as two parallel flat electrode plates or as a concentric electrode set comprising an inner electrode that is surrounded by an outer electrode. Alternative embodiments will be apparent by the person skilled in the art.

[0066] Use of the embodiment in FIG. 2 instead of the embodiment in FIG. 1 is preferred for ease-of-assembly reasons when UFP sensors are to be mass-produced at low cost and small size.

[0067] The invention relates to the detection and/or prevention of undesired flow conditions in the ionization chamber.

[0068] FIG. 3 shows an example of a desired gas flow situation within the particle charging section 12. The axes are in units of mm. The main gas flow channel is at the bottom of the figure with flow entering from the right and exiting to the left. The ionization chamber is located above the metal grid 16 (which is vertically at 2.75 mm, with the tip of the high voltage ionization electrode 14 used as the origin). Only a small fraction of the gas flow is travelling through the ionization chamber.

[0069] FIG. 4 shows an example of an undesired gas flow situation within the particle charging section 12. This flow pattern has been created by adding an oval metal shield 40 above the high voltage electrode 14, at a vertical location of +1.5 mm, and at the same potential as the high voltage ionization electrode 14. The shield blocks the upward pointing part of the ion current and is therefore creating a strongly asymmetric ionic wind force field which is oriented downwards only. This is a known approach.

[0070] The analysis of the flow conditions shows that the complete gas flow then travels through the ionization chamber.

[0071] Ion currents and gas velocities are identical in both examples.

[0072] FIG. 4 shows that a metallic shield is strongly disadvantageous when the flow conditions are considered, since it raises the operating voltage of the corona discharge device by several kilovolts. Furthermore it leads to a strongly directional flow of ionic wind and as a consequence to a dramatic increase of gas flow from the flow channel through the ionization chamber.

[0073] FIG. 5 shows that if a non-conducting shield 42 is used above the high voltage electrode 14, the change to the flow pattern is much less significant. Thus, the use of a non-metallic shield, for the same purpose as the metallic shield, is greatly preferred. The invention relates to measures to detect and prevent disadvantageous flow conditions.

[0074] A first aspect relates to the detection of undesired flow conditions.

[0075] A first approach is to measure the flow velocity in the center of the main gas flow channel (for example the region 1 mm<x<4 mm in FIGS. 3 to 5).

[0076] This velocity should not be less than a set fraction of the velocity at the entrance or exit of the main flow channel. This set fraction may for example be in the range 0.4 to 0.7, for example 0.4, 0.5 or 0.6.

[0077] FIG. 6 shows the particle charging section 12 with a first flow sensor S1 at the inlet side, a second flow sensor S2 between the inlet and outlet sides and a third flow sensor S3 at the outlet side. The sensors in this example are all outside the ionization chamber, i.e. in the main air flow channel.

[0078] If the main air flow channel is annular around the ionization chamber, then sensors may be at only one angular position around the annulus, or at multiple positions around the annulus. The design does not need to be rotationally symmetric. Furthermore openings may be provided in the top or bottom of the ionization chamber, not only in the side walls.

[0079] Only one of S1 and S3 are in fact needed, since they should have the same flow reading (as it is a closed system). The second sensor S2 is generally aligned with the high voltage electrode tip, preferably slightly towards the inlet side so that it is positioned where the greatest flow reduction is experienced as shown in FIG. 4. For example it may be positioned at least 75% of the way along the section 12 between the inlet and the high voltage electrode tip. The distance d1 is the distance of the flow sensor from the inlet end of the ionization chamber (in particular the component parallel to the general flow direction) and the distance d2 is the distance of the tip of the ionization electrode from the inlet end of the ionization chamber. Hence, in one example d2>d1 and dl>0.75d2.

[0080] A second approach is to measure the differential pressure between the pressure p.sub.cor at the inlet end of the ionization chamber and the pressure p.sub.exit at the exit of the main air channel; p=p.sub.corp.sub.exit When p is negative this is indicative of a flow of the type shown in FIG. 4. This means there is a lower pressure in the ionization chamber induced by the large flow inside the chamber.

[0081] FIG. 7 shows the particle charging section 12 with a first pressure sensor P1 at the inlet end of the ionization chamber, at a corner (for measuring p.sub.cor), and a second cor, pressure sensor P2 at the main channel exit (for measuring p.sub.exit).

[0082] A second aspect relates to how to change the operation of the sensor when adverse flow conditions have been detected.

[0083] When the undesired flow conditions are detected, the current delivered to the high voltage electrode (the corona wire/needle electrode) may be reduced depending on the measured signals, i.e. the relative flow velocities or pressure differences.

[0084] Thus, the high voltage electrode drive voltage V.sub.cor is variable by a controller 27 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, and it may be adjusted making use of the information from the flow sensor arrangement. The flow rate thought the particle sensor may additionally or alternatively be controlled to influence the flow conditions.

[0085] The measures above relate to the detection and prevention of undesired flow conditions. It is also possible to design the system to prevent and reduce the occurrence of the undesired flow conditions.

[0086] Design rules for example include:

[0087] (i) Avoid asymmetric ion flow situations for example as induced by a metallic shield at the corona potential as shown in FIG. 4.

[0088] (ii) If a shield above the high voltage electrode tip is desired, then make it non-conducting. In this way the ion cloud is broadened which is advantageous.

[0089] (iii) Avoid grid openings which are not reachable by the ion flow, but for the gas flow only. FIG. 5 shows that the flow paths between the end channel openings do not pass the high voltage electrode 14, so that the flow through these channels is not contributing significantly to the ionization.

[0090] (iv) Instead of a transverse electrode, a horizontal corona wire may be used which spans the corona chamber in flow direction (inlet to outlet direction). This yields a broad ion cloud and a broad ionic wind distribution.

[0091] The effectiveness of a given design can be verified by numerical modeling of the electrostatics, the ion current continuity equation and the laminar flow in the main flow channel and the corona chamber.

[0092] Various examples have been given above for the sensor arrangement. The sensor arrangement may be considered generally to be a flow sensor arrangement in that the sensed signals are influenced by flow conditions, or it may be considered to be a flow and/or pressure sensor arrangement. It may comprise flow rate sensors or pressure sensors or combinations of these, each of which provide measurements which relate generally to flow conditions. There may be sensor elements inside and/or outside the ionization chamber. One example has been given of a pressure sensor inside the chamber, but other examples may provide one or more flow rate sensors inside the ionization chamber. The aim is essentially to be able to distinguish between flows of the general type shown in FIG. 3 and those of the general type shown in FIG. 4. Various combinations of pressure sensors and flow rate sensors may be used to achieve this. Instead of (or as well as) sensing flow rate, it is possible to sense flow speed for example using a hot wire anemometer.

[0093] Two examples of precipitation section have been shown. However, there are other examples. For example, it is known to provide both a filter precipitation stage and an electrostatic stage so that multiple measurements are obtainedone with the electrostatic stage actuated and one with the electrostatic stage deactivated. This enables determination of both the number-averaged particle diameter and the particle number concentration.

[0094] Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word comprising does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article a or an does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measured cannot be used to advantage. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.