Blast panel assembly
20180163401 ยท 2018-06-14
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F41H5/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
E04C2/24
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E04B2/04
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F41H5/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E04B1/92
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A blast panel assembly includes a laminate formed of a plurality of glued together sheets of plywood mounted in a metal frame.
Claims
1. A blast panel assembly comprising a plurality of sheets of plywood glued together to form a laminate; a one-piece metal frame surrounding the laminate; a plurality of spaced apart bolts extending completely through the metal frame and the laminate: and nuts on said bolts securing the laminate to the frame.
2. The blast panel assembly of claim 1, wherein each layer of the laminate is formed by a plurality of sheets of plywood with abutting edges.
3. The blast panel assembly of claim 2, wherein the abutting edges of the sheets of plywood in one layer are out of alignment with the abutting edges of the sheets of plywood in any adjacent layer of the laminate.sub.
4. The blast panel assembly of claim 3, wherein said frame includes square cross section metal tubing surrounding said sheets of plywood; and angle iron strips on an inner side of the tubing, said bolts extending through said strips and said plywood sheets for connecting the sheets to the angle iron strips.
5. The blast panel assembly of claim 3, wherein said frame includes metal channel members of U-shaped cross section for receiving said sheets of plywood, said bolts and nuts connecting said sheets of plywood to said metal channel members.
6. The blast panels panel assembly of claim 3, wherein the laminate includes nine layers of three-quarter inch select grade plywood, whereby the assembly is capable of withstanding blast loads of 25-35 psi and impulses of 90-123 psi-ms.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The invention is described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention, and wherein:
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013] With reference to
[0014] The frame 1 is defined by four square cross section steel tubes 4 which are welded together to form a rectangle. The frame 1 need not be rectangular, it could be circular, triangular or any other shape. The strips 2 of angle iron are welded to the inner sides of the frame 1 and to each other, forming a rectangular bracket inside of the frame 1. The plywood sheets 3 are connected to the angle iron strips 2 by carriage bolts 5 extending through the angle iron strips 2 and the laminated plywood sheets 3, and nuts 6. The frame 1 can also be formed by U-shaped channel members (not shown).
[0015] As best shown in
[0016] Test loads were developed by detonating two batches of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil using bulk industrial explosive mixture. Each shot used a different explosive weight and standoff from the test specimen. Five pressure gauges were mounted on the steel plates on the front of the reaction structure surrounding the specimen. Two laser-based displacement readers were positioned along the vertical center line of the panel for each test. The ranges of gauge readings recorded for positive phase pressure and impulse are presented in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Pressure in psi Impulse in psi-ms Test Number (kPa) (kPa-ms) 1 33-35 (230-240) 90-103 (620-710) 2 25-28 (170-190) 96-123 (660-850)
[0017] The maximum displacement of the panel did not exceed 0.4 inch (10 mm) for either test within the first 150 ms of recorded responses. No permanent panel deformation was observed in either case during post-test inspection, i.e., the panel returned to its original pre-test position as a result of an elastic response. Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect that assemblies with a similar laminate thickness and span can likely sustain significantly higher blast loads than those tested without permanent deformation. The panels can potentially take even higher loads where permanent panel deformation is acceptable, e.g., where panels are to be subjected to a one-time blast event and only need to sustain capacity to allow for personnel egress.