METHOD FOR IMPROVING INKJET PRINT QUALITY

20180147836 · 2018-05-31

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A method is disclosed for applying marking material to a substrate, thereby reproducing an image. At least two arrays and at least two piezo-electric print elements in each array are used. An actuation signal for a print element is applied with a predetermined delay with respect to a reference actuation signal. The predetermined delay values are based on a measurement of a drop velocity in dependence on a further, simultaneous actuation of a neighboring print element. They form a repetitive series of delay values for reducing an amount of mechanical crosstalk between the print elements in an array. Two print elements that produce a drop of marking material for landing in each others vicinity on the substrate are associated with a different delay value of the repetitive series.

Claims

1. A method for applying marking material to a substrate in order to reproduce an image by at least two arrays of at least two print elements in each array, a print element comprising a piezo-electric actuation element for generating a drop of marking material, an actuation signal for a print element being applied with a predetermined delay with respect to a reference actuation signal, the predetermined delay values being based on a measurement of a drop velocity in dependence on a further, simultaneous actuation of a neighboring print element and forming a repetitive series of delay values for reducing an amount of mechanical crosstalk between the print elements in an array, wherein two print elements that produce a drop of marking material for landing in each others vicinity on the substrate are associated with a different delay value of the repetitive series of delay values.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the two print elements are each in a different array of the at least two arrays.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the at least two arrays are part of two different print heads mounted on a single carriage.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the two print elements are part of a single array that passes the same part of the substrate two times.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a delay value of the repetitive series of delay values is a multiple of a time step.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the time step is based on a channel resonance frequency.

7. A print system for applying marking material to a substrate in order to reproduce an image, wherein a method according to claim 1 is applied for improving a quality of the printed image.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:

[0018] FIG. 1 is a configuration of arrays and print heads as used in the invention;

[0019] FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing of an ink dot jetted onto a substrate;

[0020] FIG. 3 shows a graph of two applied signals, one being delayed; and

[0021] FIG. 4 shows a relation between an amount of cross-talk and a delay time between the actuation of neighboring print elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0022] The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar elements are identified with the same reference numeral. The skilled person will recognise that other embodiments are possible within the scope of the appended claims.

[0023] FIG. 1 shows a configuration 1 of two print heads 2 and 3, each print head comprising two arrays of print elements, respectively 4, 5 and 6, 7. A print element 10 is indicated by its opening towards the substrate. From this opening, also known as nozzle, the ink is applied. The print element further comprises a piezo-electric actuator that is in connection with an ink chamber. These are not further shown in detail. The configuration is viewed from the side where the ink leaves the print head, also called the nozzle plate. Each array comprises 128 nozzles, each print head comprises two arrays. The two print heads are accurately positioned in a carriage that is reciprocated over the substrate in order to print an image. The distance 8 between two print elements in an array is in this configuration 1/75 inch, or 340 m. The distances between elements of different arrays is indicated by lines 9. This configuration is able to apply ink dots in lines that are 1/300 inch apart, or 84.5 m. Images with 600 lines per inch are thus printed by two passes of the carriage.

[0024] FIG. 2 shows the application of a single ink drop 12 from a nozzle of a print element 10 in a nozzle plate of carriage configuration 1. The carriage has a forward velocity 13 and the ink drop is vertically jetted with velocity 14. This results in a drop trajectory 15 and an ink dot on the substrate 11 at position 16. If the velocity of the ink drop is smaller, for example due to cross-talk from a simultaneously jetted drop by a neighboring print element, a trajectory 17 may result and the ink dot will appear on position 18, well apart from the intended location 16. Thus, it is important that the velocity of the jetted ink drops is constant.

[0025] FIG. 3 shows an actuation signal in a time 20, voltage 21 graph. A first signal 22 is applied without delay relative to the trigger moments 24 that indicate a timing for a new print position on the substrate. The shape of the signal is such that the piezo-electric actuator is controlled to expand the ink chamber of the corresponding print element, to stabilize the expansion and then to contract the ink chamber, but a different shape is also possible, as long as the signal fits into the time span between two trigger moments. Depending on the size of the expansion, the contraction and the timing of the signal, an ink drop is generated by the print element. A second signal 23 is applied to a neighboring print element with a delay 25 relative to the trigger moments and the first signal 22. The first and second signal are not necessarily exactly the same, since the signals may be generated by different electric sources and may be tuned to the specific properties of the print element. Still, a delay value specifies a start of the expansion part of the signal relative to a trigger moment for a line of print positions. In the investigated embodiment of the invention, the time between the trigger moments is 20 microseconds.

[0026] FIG. 4 shows the influence of a delay 30 (in microseconds) between two signals for neighboring print elements within one array. This influence 31 is given as a relative change of drop velocity, which is nominal 4 m/s. It can be seen that not only directly neighboring, but also further neighboring print elements within a single array affect the velocity of an ink drop. A crucial aspect is that for a number of delay time values, the influence is close to zero, which means that the velocity of an ink drop is the same whether or not a neighboring print element is fired to generate an ink drop

[0027] Based on this finding, a series of delay values has been determined that is applied repetitively to the print elements of an array. Different series are possible. In the present embodiment, a series with a repetition length of 8 print elements has been applied.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 A repetitive series of delay values to be applied in a single array. A B C D E F G H delay time (s) 0.0 2.5 17.5 10.0 5.0 15.0 12.5 7.5

[0028] The delay times respectively associated with print elements of an array can be indicated as ABCDEFGHABCDEFGHA . . . . Although it is not essential that the delay values are an integer times a discrete time step, as in this case each value is a integer multiple of 2.5 s, it reduces the number of combinations that need to be considered. The value of the discrete time step is based on a channel resonance frequency as derived from the zero-crossings in FIG. 4.

[0029] For a combination of four arrays as shown in FIG. 1, in a print mode that applies a two-pass strategy, a delay order as indicated in Table 2 arises.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Delay values associated with respective print elements in a configuration of print heads, each print head having two arrays in a two-pass strategy. The numbering of print elements is per array. print line pass print head array print element delay 1 1 1 1 1 A 2 2 1 1 65 A 3 1 2 1 1 A 4 2 2 1 65 A 5 1 1 2 1 A 6 2 1 2 65 A 7 1 2 2 1 A 8 2 2 2 65 A 9 1 1 1 2 B 10 2 1 1 66 B 11 1 2 1 2 B 12 2 2 1 66 B 13 1 1 2 2 B 14 2 1 2 66 B 15 1 2 2 2 B 16 2 2 2 66 B 17 1 1 1 3 C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[0030] The density of the print lines is 600 lines per inch. As is apparent from the table, the odd print lines are printed in a first pass, the even print lines are printed in a second pass of the carriage over the substrate. Eight neigbouring print lines are printed with the same delay value, which leads to visible defects, in dependence on the image that is printed.

[0031] According to an embodiment of the invention, the order of delay values is mixed over the various arrays of the print heads and passes, such that two print lines, each printed by a corresponding print element, that are in each others vicinity on the substrate, are associated with a different delay value of the repetitive series of delay values.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Delay values associated with respective print elements in the same application as in Table 2, but here a mixed order. print line pass print head array print element delay 1 1 1 1 1 A 2 2 1 1 65 B 3 1 2 1 1 C 4 2 2 1 65 D 5 1 1 2 1 E 6 2 1 2 65 F 7 1 2 2 1 G 8 2 2 2 65 H 9 1 1 1 2 B 10 2 1 1 66 C 11 1 2 1 2 D 12 2 2 1 66 E 13 1 1 2 2 F 14 2 1 2 66 G 15 1 2 2 2 H 16 2 2 2 66 A 17 1 1 1 3 C 18 2 1 1 67 D 19 1 2 1 3 E 20 2 2 1 67 F 21 1 1 2 3 G 22 2 1 2 67 H 23 1 2 2 3 A 24 2 2 2 67 B 25 1 1 1 4 D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[0032] An example of this mixing is shown in Table 3. Within each array, the same order of delay times as given in Table 1 is applied. Using the delay values of Table 3, no systematic density variation is observed, thus improving the resulting print quality.

[0033] Other print strategies may require a different series of delay values and a different order of mixing, as long as print elements that produce drops of ink landing in each others vicinity are associated with a different delay value.

[0034] The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.