Method for predefining a current in a solenoid valve
09982615 ยท 2018-05-29
Assignee
Inventors
- Heike Lang (Heimsheim, DE)
- Frank Schmitt (Stuttgart, DE)
- Ralph Kober (Schwieberdingen, DE)
- Holger Rapp (Ditzingen, DE)
- Fabian Fischer (Stuttgart, DE)
- Marco Beier (Leonberg, DE)
- Stefan Stein (Stuttgart, DE)
Cpc classification
F02D2200/0602
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T10/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F02D2041/224
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D2041/2055
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/2467
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D2200/063
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M47/027
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D2041/2058
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/221
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F02D41/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/22
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M57/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02M47/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A method for predefining a current through a solenoid coil of a solenoid valve, a closing point in time of the solenoid valve being detected with the aid of a sensor, a sensor value being monitored, and, when a premature closing of the solenoid valve is identified based on the monitored sensor value, the current through the solenoid coil of the solenoid valve is increased.
Claims
1. A method for predefining a current through a solenoid coil of a solenoid valve, comprising: detecting a closing point in time of the solenoid valve via a sensor; monitoring a sensor value; identifying a premature closing of the solenoid valve based on the monitored sensor value; increasing the current through the solenoid coil of the solenoid valve based on the identifying of the premature closing; wherein the increasing of the current includes iteratively increasing the current over a plurality of activations of the solenoid valve until solenoid value is no longer identified as closing prematurely.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the premature closing of the solenoid valve is identified based on the monitored sensor value when the sensor value reaches or exceeds a sensor threshold value.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the premature closing of the solenoid valve is identified based on the monitored sensor value when a gradient over time of a chronological progression of the sensor value one of reaches or exceeds a gradient threshold value.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the current through the solenoid coil in the solenoid valve is only increased up to a maximum value.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising creating a diagnostic message when the current through the solenoid coil in the solenoid valve is increased to a diagnostic value.
6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the sensor value is monitored during a time period in which the solenoid coil is activated.
7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the sensor value is output as a voltage signal by the sensor.
8. The method as recited in one of the preceding claims, wherein the current through the solenoid coil of the solenoid valve is increased in an activation process following an activation process in which the premature closing of the solenoid valve has been identified.
9. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising storing, after the current has been increased, a value of the current for subsequent activation processes as a new value of the current.
10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the solenoid valve is used for a solenoid valve injector for injecting fuel into a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine.
11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein the fuel is injected from a high-pressure accumulator.
12. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein after each increase of the current, a value of the current is stored and is used in a subsequence activation of the solenoid valve.
13. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium having a computer program for predefining a current through a solenoid coil of a solenoid valve stored thereon, the computer program, when executed by an arithmetic unit, causing the arithmetic unit to perform: detecting a closing point in time of the solenoid valve via a sensor; monitoring a sensor value; identifying a premature closing of the solenoid valve based on the monitored sensor value; increasing the current through the solenoid coil of the solenoid valve based on the identifying of the premature closing; wherein the increasing of the current includes iteratively increasing the current over a plurality of activations of the solenoid valve until solenoid valve is no longer identified as closing prematurely.
14. The non-transitory machine-readable medium as recited in claim 13, wherein after each increase of the current, a value of the current is stored and is used in a subsequence activation of the solenoid valve.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4)
(5) High-pressure chamber 2 is connectable via injector nozzles, which are not shown, to a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine, which is also not shown. The injector nozzles are controlled in the known manner with the aid of a nozzle needle, of which
(6) When the outflow channel is closed off with the aid of control valve 10 and the nozzle needle is in its closed position, the same high pressure as in high-pressure chamber 2 develops in control chamber 7, with the consequence that plunger 6 in
(7) Control valve 10 has a sleeve-shaped closing body 11, which is tensioned by a closing spring 12, designed as a helical compression spring, against a seat which is concentric with respect to the outlet opening of outflow channel 9. In the example of
(8) Sleeve-shaped closing body 11 is axially displaceably guided on a guide rod 13 which is coaxial with respect to longitudinal axis 100 of injector body 1, the annular gap between the inner circumference of closing body 11 and the outer circumference of guide rod 13 being designed as a practically leak-free throttle or sealing gap. When closing body 11 assumes the closed position shown in
(9) A star-shaped armature 15 of a solenoid system 16 is situated on closing body 11 and is provided as an actuator for actuating control valve 10. Closing body 11 and armature 15 may be designed as one component or also as two components. In the known manner, this solenoid system 16 includes a solenoid coil 17, which is situated within a solenoid system which is concentric with respect to guide rod 13 and has an annular outer pole 18 and an annular inner pole 19. When solenoid coil 17 is energized with a current I, armature 15 is magnetically attracted by poles 18 and 19, so that closing body 11 is lifted off its seat against the force of closing spring 12 and control valve 10 is opened.
(10) During the closed phase of the nozzle needle connected to plunger 6, i.e., with closed injector nozzles, control valve 10 is closed, and the same fluid pressures are present in pressure chamber 14 and in control chamber 7. Immediately prior to the closing point in time of the nozzle needle, the pressure in control chamber 7 drops due to the low pressure at this point in time beneath the nozzle seat of the nozzle needle and the attendant closing movement of plunger 6 under the high pressure in inflow channel 5. Immediately after the nozzle needle is closed, the now stopped plunger 6 results in a steep rise in the pressure in control chamber 7, the control chamber pressure increasing to the pressure in inflow channel 5.
(11) The solenoid valve injector moreover includes a sensor 20, with the aid of which a closing point in time of solenoid valve 10 is detected. For example, sensor 20 may be designed as a piezoelectric sensor, which detects a valve chamber pressure present in valve chamber 14, and outputs a corresponding signal having a voltage U, which is detected by a control unit.
(12)
(13) As is apparent from the diagram, current I is switched on at point in time t=0.2 ms, which is identifiable from the current peak (switch-on peak). Up until this point in time, voltage U is approximately 0.5 V, which corresponds to a position of solenoid valve 10 in the idle state (closed). At point in time t=0.2 ms, current I is switched on, which is visible from a so-called boost current (switch-on peak) up to approximately 13 A. Voltage U jumps to 4 V, which corresponds to a completely open position of solenoid valve 10.
(14) Current I is set on average to a value of 7.5 A, a so-called inrush current. At point in time t=0.6 ms, current I is set to a lower value of 5.5 A on average, a so-called holding current, until current I is switched off at point in time 1.1 ms. Voltage U rises in the time from t=0.2 ms to t=1.1 ms with an almost constant slope, i.e., a constant gradient, from 4 V to 1 V. This corresponds to a uniform, slow discharge of the piezoelectric sensor, which takes place despite the solenoid valve being open. At point in time t=1.2 ms, as current I is switched off or the activation ends, the voltage rises suddenly with a larger slope, i.e., a larger gradient, up to more than 4 V. This indicates a sudden pressure change by closing of solenoid valve 10.
(15)
(16) The progressions of current I and voltage U correspond to those of
(17) According to the present invention, it is possible for the control unit now, as soon as voltage U prematurely exceeds sensor threshold value U.sub.max, which in particular has the value zero, to increase current I in solenoid valve 10, so that the magnetic force generated by solenoid coil 17 is sufficient again in a subsequent injection process to keep armature 15, and thus solenoid valve 10, open.
(18) Moreover, a gradient threshold value U.sub.max is plotted, which in the present example corresponds approximately to the slope of voltage U, as it occurs during the slow, steady discharge of the piezoelectric sensor. During closing of solenoid valve 10, this gradient threshold value U.sub.max is exceeded, whereby in the present example, alternatively or additionally to threshold value U.sub.max, a premature closing is identifiable.
(19) It shall be noted in this regard that an increase in current I may mean both an increase in the inrush current, with the time duration of the inrush current remaining the same, and an increase in the holding current, at least for a starting time. In particular, the holding current may be increased up to the level of the inrush current, which is equivalent to an extension of the time duration of the inrush current.
(20) However, current I is furthermore only increased until a maximum value I.sub.max is reached. This prevents an overloading of solenoid valve 10, in particular of solenoid coil 17, which would result in damage to solenoid valve 10, and potentially also the feed lines.
(21) Should current I have to be increased up to a diagnostic value (for example, up to maximum value I.sub.max), additionally a diagnostic message, for example in the form of a fault memory entry, is generated and stored. In this way, for example during a stay in a repair shop, solenoid valve 10 may be deliberately replaced or repaired, or else other potential causes may be inferred.