ASSEMBLY FOR REDUCING CO2 EMISSION IN PLANTS FOR CLINKER PRODUCTION
20240360033 ยท 2024-10-31
Inventors
- Matteo Carmelo ROMANO (Piacenza PC, IT)
- Edoardo DE LENA (Guglionesi CB, IT)
- Maurizio SPINELLI (Piacenza PC, IT)
Cpc classification
C04B7/434
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B7/367
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F27B7/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F27M2003/03
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F27B15/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
C04B7/43
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F27B15/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
The invention concerns: A) An assembly to reduce the emission of CO.sub.2 in a plant for the production of clinkers comprising two calciners and a carbonator arranged between the two calciners, wherein one of the calciners is an integral part of a conventional clinker production system. Thanks to this assembly, the plant can continue to operate in the clinker production process even if the CO.sub.2 capture system which uses the carbonator and the other calciner of the assembly is disconnected due to malfunctions or maintenance characterized in that said carbonator is free of recirculation to both said two calciners. B) The relative plants comprising both the assembly and the actual clinker production plant in which the clinker production plant is of the conventional type existed before and already operational, or said plant is installed simultaneously with the assembly units. C) The clinker production process with reduction of CO.sub.2 emission conducted in the plants B.
Claims
1.-14. (canceled)
15. An assembly configured to reduce the emission of CO.sub.2 of a plant for the production of clinkers, the assembly comprising: two calciners and a carbonator arranged between the two calciners, wherein one of the two calciners is an integral part of a clinker production system and is configured to continue to operate in a clinker production process even if a CO.sub.2 capture system of the plant that uses the carbonator and the other calciner of the assembly is disconnected, wherein said carbonator is free from recycle to both of said two calciners.
16. An assembly according to claim 15, wherein one of said two calciners is a primary calciner and precedes the carbonator, while the other calciner, arranged downstream of the carbonator is a secondary calciner.
17. A plant for the production of clinkers comprising both the assembly according to claim 15 and units of the clinker production plant.
18. A plant according to claim 17, including a carbonator, a primary calciner preceding the carbonator, or a secondary calciner positioned downstream of the carbonator, and, a sorbent cooler are configured to be disconnectable from one another in the event of malfunctions or maintenance, and reconnectable with one another after repair or after maintenance.
19. A plant according to claim 17, further comprising at least one preheater of a mineral raw flour located upstream of the primary calciner.
20. A plant according to claim 17, further comprising multiple pre-heaters of a mineral raw flour that are located upstream of the primary calciner and are arranged in parallel in several steps.
21. A plant according to claim 19, further comprising a raw mineral flour grinder located upstream of said at least one preheater.
22. A clinker production process configured to be conducted in a plant for the production of clinkers, the method comprising the following procedures: a) a first calcination reaction carried out in a primary calciner on a preheated raw material stream to give a first stream of CO.sub.2-enriched gas, which is removed and a first calcined material stream comprising CaO, wherein the primary calciner is a first of two calciners of the plant, the primary calciner preceding a carbonator of the plant, the carbonator arranged between the two calciners; wherein one of the two calciners is configured to continue to operate in a clinker production process even if a CO.sub.2 capture system of the plant that uses the carbonator and the other calciner of the two calciners is disconnected; wherein energy necessary to support the first calcination reaction is generated by an oxy-fuel combustion using as oxidizer a mixture formed by O.sub.2 and by a part of the CO.sub.2-enriched gas exiting from said primary calciner, in order to avoid dilution with nitrogen present in air; b) cooling the first calcined material to produce cooled CaO-enriched calcined material; c) a carbonation reaction performed with the cooled CaO-enriched calcined material to obtain calcium carbonate-enriched material; d) a second calcination reaction conducted in a secondary calciner of the two calciners with calcium carbonate-enriched material produced during the procedure c) to generate a second stream of CO.sub.2-enriched gas and a second stream of calcined material comprising CaO, wherein the secondary calciner is arranged downstream of the carbonator; wherein energy necessary to support the second calcination reaction is generated by an oxy-combustion using as oxidizer a mixture formed by O.sub.2 and by a part of the second stream of CO.sub.2-enriched gas exiting from the secondary calciner, in order to avoid dilution with nitrogen present in air; e) transforming the calcined material comprising CaO of the second stream into clinker in a rotary kiln with the use of heat provided by combustion of at least one fuel and air, and f) cooling a product produced by said transforming in a clinker cooler.
23. A clinker production process according to claim 22, wherein the first calcination reaction and the second calcination reaction are performed with a respective output temperature between 850 C. and 950 C.
24. A clinker production process according to claim 22, wherein said cooling the first calcined material includes cooling the first calcined material to a temperature between 55 and 650 C.
25. A clinker production process according to claim 22, wherein the carbonation reaction includes utilizing CO.sub.2-enriched combustion gases formed in the rotary kiln during combustion in air.
26. A clinker production process according to claim 22, configured to be performed in said plant that has been complemented with multiple pre-heaters of a mineral raw flour that are located upstream of the primary calciner and that are arranged in parallel, the process further comprising: cooling, in a pre-heater of the multiple pre-heaters, combustion gases formed in the rotary kiln during production of clinkers to obtained cooled combustion gases, and sending the cooled combustion gases to the carbonator to be used in the carbonation reaction.
27. A clinker production process according to claim 22, further comprising: feeding a raw material that is poor in calcium carbonate to the secondary calcinator.
28. A clinker production process according to claim 22, wherein the procedures d) and f) are performed while at least one of the carbonator and the primary calciner is disconnected due to malfunction or maintenance.
29. A clinker production process according to claim 22, wherein the cooling includes cooling the first calcined material in a sorbent cooler of the plant and/or in a carbonator equipped with an internal cooling system.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0048] For the purposes of the present invention, the definition comprising does not exclude the presence of additional units/steps not expressly listed after this definition; on the contrary, the definition consisting of or constituted by, excludes the presence of additional steps/units in addition to those expressly listed.
[0049] For the purposes of the present invention, assembly means the Dual-calciner calcium looping (Du-CaL) configuration, characterized by the presence of two calciners, between which a carbonator is arranged, and of which one of said calciners is an integral part of a conventional clinker production system.
[0050] For the purposes of the present invention, primary calciner means the calciner that receives the preheated raw material and that precedes the carbonator, whereas secondary calciner means the calciner that receives the material exiting from the carbonator and prepares it before being introduced into the rotary kiln. According to a preferred solution in the assembly according to the present invention one of said two calciners is the primary calciner (Primary calciner); while the other calciner, arranged downstream of the carbonator (Carbonator) is the secondary calciner (Secondary calciner). In addition, one of the two calciners is an integral part of the conventional clinker production system and can therefore continue to operate in the clinker production process even if the CO.sub.2 capture system which uses the carbonator and the other calciner is disconnected due to malfunctions or maintenance.
[0051] The plants containing said assembly or Du-CaL configuration associated with units of plants of conventional type for the production of the clinker and which differ in that the actual units of conventional type dedicated to the production of clinkers existed before or have been installed at the same time as the assembly or Du-CaL configuration are a further object of the invention. It is understood that when the calciner is present in the pre-existing units of the plant for the production of clinkers, this can be adapted in the new configuration to perform the function of both primary calciner and secondary calciner, depending on the specificity of the plant in which the process is integrated.
[0052]
[0053] The assembly object of the invention is arranged, with reference to the stream of solid material, upstream of the units of the conventional plant for the production of the clinker. These two plants are distinguished because in the case of plant 4 of
[0054] According to a preferred solution, the calciner indicated in the figures as Secondary calciner is also an integral part of the units of the conventional plant intended for the production of clinkers.
[0055] In both figures, downstream of the secondary calciner there is arranged the rotary kiln or Rotary kiln as shown in the figures followed in turn by the clinker cooler indicated in the figures as Clinker cooler.
[0056] Preferably, in both types of plants of
[0057]
[0058] The plant can be fed with two separate flour mixtures, the first rich in CaCO.sub.3 (>65% by mass) and the second poor in CaCO.sub.3 (<65% by mass). The CaCO.sub.3-rich flour, after being preheated, is fed to the primary calciner (a) and is used as a sorbent for the removal of CO.sub.2 in the carbonator (c). As far as the CaCO.sub.3-poor material is concerned, it is preheated and fed to the secondary calciner (d) together with the material exiting from the carbonator (c). The overall mixture exiting from the secondary calciner is fed to the rotary kiln (e) to complete the clinker production steps.
[0059] With this type of configuration, it is also easier to operate the plant especially in cases where the carbonator and/or primary calciner are disconnected due to malfunctions or maintenance. In this case the process of the invention would be reduced to steps d), e), f) only.
[0060] Preferably in all the three plants according to the present invention represented in
[0061] For example, they contain three preheaters arranged in parallel in several steps and, according to a particularly preferred solution such as the one shown in
[0062] All three of the aforesaid plants object of the present invention upstream of the preheater are equipped with one or more grinders of the starting raw mineral indicated in
[0063] Preferably in the process of the invention, the calcination steps operate with output temperatures between 850 C. and 950 C. and employ as a heat source the combustion reaction of a mixture of fuel and oxygen with low nitrogen content and other gases other than CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2O, to easily recover the CO.sub.2 exiting from said calciners.
[0064] In the cooler in step b) of the process according to the present invention the calcined material is preferably cooled to a temperature between 55 and 650 C.
[0065] Preferably in the process according to the present invention in step c) of carbonation the combustion gases rich in CO.sub.2 and N.sub.2, deriving from the processes of combustion in air in the rotary kiln, are employed. The output temperature from this step is preferably between 65 and 750 C.
[0066] If reference is made in particular to
[0067] In both plants 3 and 4 shown in
[0068] The main difference compared to the classic Integrated CaL configuration is that the solids exiting from the carbonator do not return to the first calciner, but do not return either to the second calciner as disclosed in US 2018/0028967. Thus, the configuration object of the present invention is also defined as a single passage (once-through), without recirculations between the carbonator and the two calciners. Therefore, in the Du-CaL configuration, the raw material does not undergo multiple calcination-carbonation cycles and the sorbent used in the carbonator derives from a single calcination process performed in the primary calciner. This allows for better performances in terms of CO.sub.2 removal efficiency, because there is no deactivation of the material caused by repeated calcination-carbonation cycles as clearly reported in the graph of
[0069] We can therefore conclude that with this type of assembly, or Du-CaL configuration, the following results are obtained: [0070] 1) no recirculations are performed between the carbonator and the calciner, a feature that improves the controllability of the process. [0071] 2) The calcined material used for capturing CO.sub.2 undergoes only one calcination process (in the first calciner). The absence of repeated calcination-carbonation cycles allows to improve the ability of the obtained CaO to react with the CO.sub.2| forming CaCO.sub.3 and therefore to increase the performances of the process. This happens for the following reasons: (i) it is well known that repeated calcination-carbonation cycles worsen the properties of CaO as a CO.sub.2 sorbent: the sorbent resulting from a single calcination thus possesses the maximum capacity to absorb CO.sub.2 in the carbonator; (ii) the primary calciner can be controlled such as to work at moderate temperature and/or with low residence time, so as to minimize parasitic reactions (in particular the reaction between CaO and SiO.sub.2 which leads to the formation of Calcium-Silicates) and produce a high-performance sorbent (the lower the calcination temperature and the residence time, the better the performance of CaO as sorbent), while the secondary calciner can operate at a higher temperature to obtain a high calcination degree, thus producing a better material for firing in the rotary kiln. In other words, the operating conditions of the two calciners can be modulated so as to obtain the best possible properties of the calcined material: (i) the primary calciner to produce the optimum sorbent; (ii) the secondary calciner to produce highly calcined material for the following clinker production. [0072] 3) The Du-CaL configuration allows an easier retrofit of existing plants, in fact, as mentioned above, it can be installed in plants of the conventional and pre-existing type for the production of clinkers and a greater reliability for the production of clinkers: the new units to be installed (additional calciner, possible calcined material cooler and carbonator) can be easily disconnected in case of malfunction or maintenance need from the existing cement plant, and reconnected after repair of the malfunction or at the end of maintenance. As shown by way of example in
[0073]
[0074] The presence of the two calciners allows to ensure an adequate calcination degree of the solids entering the rotary kiln and, at the same time, to generate an optimal calcined material for the performance of the carbonator.
[0075] Below are the results of the mass and energy balances obtained from process simulations of a possible example of a Du-CaL system (
[0076] It has also been imposed, in this particular example, that the solids exiting from the primary calciner (#11) have a temperature of 920 C., a calcination degree equal to 92.5% and a composition completely similar to that presented in [11]. The secondary calciner ensures that the solids entering the rotary kiln have a composition typical of those entering the rotary kiln of a modern cement plant. This means that the operating conditions of the rotary kiln and of the clinker cooler remain similar to those of a modern cement plant with a clinker production of about 2500-3000 t/day.
[0077] The table with the thermodynamic properties and the composition of the various streams present in
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Stream properties for the Du-CaL case presented in FIG. 7 Mass Temp P Ar CO.sub.2 H.sub.2O N.sub.2 O.sub.2 Moi C4AF kg/s C. bar % vol % vol % vol % vol % vol % wt % wt. 1 (s) 15.09 60.0 1.01 0.29 0.00 2 (s) 6.98 60.0 1.01 0.29 0.00 3 (s) 30.18 60.0 1.01 0.29 0.00 4 (g) 17.68 508.0 1.01 0.85 17.97 6.17 71.31 3.70 4 (s) 0.86 508.0 1.01 0.00 0.33 5 (s) 17.12 820.1 1.01 0.00 1.64 6 (g) 11.67 512.1 1.01 1.34 73.57 11.76 7.26 6.06 6 (s) 0.41 512.1 1.01 0.00 0.00 7 (s) 18.92 860.0 1.01 0.00 0.50 8 (g) 59.28 560.6 1.01 1.18 79.42 10.62 3.57 5.20 8 (s) 1.72 560.6 1.01 0.00 0.00 9 (s) 44.06 869.2 1.01 0.00 0.27 10 (g) 39.19 360.2 1.11 1.69 56.10 7.73 3.55 30.00 10 (s) 15.69 920.0 1.01 0.00 0.78 11 (s) 48.62 920.0 1.01 0.00 0.76 12 (g) 40.19 618.0 1.01 0.95 1.48 3.22 79.42 14.94 12 (s) 0.00 618.0 1.01 0.00 0.00 13 (s) 106.74 618.0 1.01 0.00 0.86 14 (g) 14.00 706.4 1.01 0.99 4.14 7.21 83.34 4.32 0.00 0.00 14 (s) 5.56 706.4 1.01 0.00 0.84 15 (s) 53.91 706.4 1.01 0.00 0.83 16 (g) 11.05 920.0 1.01 1.38 79.33 12.20 2.10 5.00 16 (s) 12.37 920.0 1.01 0.00 0.76 17 (s) 38.32 920.0 1.01 0.00 0.77 18 (g) 17.24 1078.5 1.01 0.85 18.49 5.89 71.48 3.30 18 (s) 2.93 1078.5 1.01 0.00 9.66 19 (g) 26.19 1049.8 1.01 0.92 0.03 1.03 77.28 20.73 19 (s) 0.76 1049.8 1.01 0.00 9.86 20 (g) 14.51 915.1 1.01 0.92 0.03 1.03 77.28 20.73 21 (g) 39.40 299.0 1.01 0.92 0.03 1.03 77.28 20.73 21 (s) 1.18 299.0 1.01 0.00 9.60 22 (s) 32.60 114.9 1.01 0.00 9.66 23 (g) 14.00 212.9 0.97 0.99 4.14 7.21 83.34 4.32 23 (s) 5.56 212.9 0.97 0.00 0.84 24 (g) 26.19 212.9 1.01 0.92 0.03 1.03 77.28 20.73 24 (s) 0.76 212.9 1.01 0.00 9.86 25 (g) 40.19 212.9 0.97 0.95 1.48 3.21 79.42 14.94 25 (s) 6.32 212.9 0.97 0.00 1.93 26 (g) 40.19 434.2 1.01 0.95 1.48 3.22 79.42 14.94 26 (s) 0.00 434.2 1.01 0.00 0.00 27 (g) 70.95 400.0 1.01 1.21 78.44 10.81 4.19 5.35 27 (s) 2.13 400.0 1.01 0.00 0.00 28 (g) 38.13 320.0 1.01 1.21 78.44 10.81 4.19 5.35 28 (s) 1.14 320.0 1.01 0.00 0.00 29 (g) 38.13 285.5 1.01 1.21 78.44 10.81 4.19 5.35 29 (s) 1.14 285.5 1.01 0.00 0.00 30 (g) 38.13 60.0 1.01 1.21 78.44 10.81 4.19 5.35 30 (s) 1.14 60.0 1.01 0.00 0.00 31 (g) 77.01 15.0 1.01 0.92 0.03 1.03 77.28 20.73 32 (g) 2.93 15.0 1.11 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 95.00 32b (g) 9.09 15.0 1.11 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 95.00 33 (g) 2.93 150.0 1.11 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 95.00 33b (g) 9.09 150.0 1.11 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 95.00 34 (g) 6.53 308.1 1.11 2.11 39.09 5.39 3.09 50.32 34 (s) 0.11 308.1 1.11 0.00 0.00 35 (g) 38.31 360.2 1.11 1.71 56.62 7.80 3.58 30.28 35 (s) 0.88 360.2 1.11 0.00 0.00 36 (s) 51.80 706.4 1.01 0.00 0.83 38 (f) 1.38 60.0 1.01 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg 39 (f) 1.19 60.0 1.01 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg 40 (f) 3.62 60.0 1.01 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg C3S C3A C2S CaO CaCO.sub.3 SiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 MgCO.sub.3 MgO CaSO.sub.4 % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. % wt. 1 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.43 13.38 3.34 2.02 1.54 0.00 0.00 2 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.43 13.38 3.34 2.02 1.54 0.00 0.00 3 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.43 13.38 3.34 2.02 1.54 0.00 0.00 4 (g) 4 (s) 1.72 0.37 0.35 0.04 77.37 13.02 3.29 1.97 1.50 0.03 0.00 5 (s) 10.80 1.81 2.35 0.13 66.13 11.14 2.78 1.68 1.28 0.20 0.07 6 (g) 6 (s) 0.17 0.00 0.51 1.88 76.99 13.49 3.41 2.02 1.50 0.03 0.00 7 (s) 2.90 0.61 9.68 31.76 31.86 14.11 4.56 2.55 0.53 0.73 0.20 8 (g) 8 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.59 78.81 13.45 3.37 2.09 1.54 0.00 0.00 9 (s) 1.59 0.34 5.43 17.86 52.94 13.77 3.99 2.32 0.99 0.40 0.09 10 (g) 10 (s) 4.48 0.95 15.27 50.20 4.52 14.41 5.15 2.85 0.00 1.13 0.26 11 (s) 4.48 0.95 15.28 50.21 4.52 14.42 5.14 2.85 0.00 1.13 0.26 12 (g) 12 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 (s) 5.16 1.05 14.57 42.53 13.26 13.66 4.86 2.70 0.00 1.09 0.25 14 (g) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 (s) 4.95 1.02 13.98 36.57 20.85 13.20 4.69 2.60 0.00 1.05 0.24 15 (s) 4.96 1.01 13.98 36.57 20.86 13.21 4.69 2.60 0.00 1.05 0.24 16 (g) 16 (s) 4.44 0.93 14.82 48.65 6.47 14.48 5.20 2.83 0.00 1.13 0.30 17 (s) 4.44 0.93 14.82 48.64 6.46 14.48 5.20 2.83 0.00 1.13 0.30 18 (g) 18 (s) 63.58 10.63 13.83 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.38 19 (g) 19 (s) 63.50 10.64 13.78 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.33 20 (g) 21 (g) 21 (s) 63.66 10.67 13.81 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.32 22 (s) 63.56 10.63 13.84 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.39 23 (g) 23 (s) 4.95 1.02 13.98 36.57 20.85 13.20 4.69 2.60 0.00 1.05 0.24 24 (g) 24 (s) 63.50 10.64 13.78 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.33 25 (g) 25 (s) 12.01 2.15 13.97 32.27 18.34 11.61 4.12 2.28 0.00 1.06 0.25 26 (g) 26 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27 (g) 27 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 0.00 28 (g) 28 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 0.00 29 (g) 29 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 30 (g) 30 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 0.00 31 (g) 32 (g) 32b (g) 33 (g) 33b (g) 34 (g) 34 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 0.00 35 (g) 35 (s) 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.81 78.53 13.44 3.37 2.03 1.50 0.03 0.00 36 (s) 4.96 1.01 13.98 36.57 20.86 13.21 4.69 2.60 0.00 1.05 0.24 38 (f) 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg 39 (f) 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg 40 (f) 69%, 4% H, 0.5% S, 0.48 N, 9% O, 16.5% ash; LHV = 27.15 MJ/kg
[0078] Table 2 shows the results of the material and energy balance of the particular Du-CaL case shown in
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Material and energy balances for an example case of the Du-CaL and Integrated CaL configuration [11]. The quantities shown refer to the clinker unit (clk) produced. Reference Integrated cement plant Du-CaL CaL Maximum sorbent conversion, % 60% 40% Total fuel consumption, MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.clk 3.24 5.16 5.44 Fuel consumption in the rotary kiln, MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.clk 1.23 1.15 1.15 Fuel consumption in the primary calciner, MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.clk 2.01 3.02 4.29 Fuel consumption in the secondary calciner, 0.99 MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.clk Total CO.sub.2 emissions, kg.sub.CO2/t.sub.clk 865.2 44.9 44.2 CO.sub.2 emissions in the fumes, kg.sub.CO2/t.sub.clk 865.2 28.0 25.7 CO.sub.2 emissions from the CPU, kg.sub.CO2/t.sub.clk 16.8 18.5 Reduction of total CO.sub.2 emissions, % 94.6% 94.9% Power balance Net electricity produced in the steam cycle, kWh.sub.and/t.sub.clk 158.7 179.5 Electrical consumptions ASU, kWhe/t.sub.clk 78.7 84.9 Electrical consumptions of fans (CaL system), kWhe/t.sub.clk 9.6 10.3 Electrical consumptions CPU, kWhe/t.sub.clk 114.2 117.3 Electrical consumptions of cooling system, kWh.sub.and/t.sub.clk 5.0 5.0 Electrical consumptions of other auxiliaries, kWhand/t.sub.clk 131.6 137.5 117.3 Net electricity consumptions, kWh.sub.and/t.sub.clk 131.6 186.3 171.0
[0079] The Du-CaL configuration allows to achieve a reduction of the CO.sub.2 emissions of the cement plant by about 95%, a value similar to that obtained in the Integrated CaL case, but with a fuel saving in the system of about 5.2% (5.16 MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.elk against 5.44 MJ.sub.LHV/kg.sub.elk). This is mainly due to the lack of solid material recirculation between carbonator and calciner in the Du-CaL configuration and to the increased activity of the sorbent used. In fact, avoiding recirculation between carbonator and calciner also avoids the energy expenditure due to heating from about 700 C. (carbonator output temperature) to about 920 C. (calciner output temperature) of the aggregates accumulated in the system, while the presence of more active material, allows to achieve high CO.sub.2 removal efficiencies with a lower recirculation of solids in the carbonator. Since there is less fuel consumption in the Du-CaL system, the advantage of smaller dimensions being required for very expensive components common to the two plants, such as the air separation unit (ASU) and the CO.sub.2 compression and purification unit (CPU), compared to the Integrated CaL case, is also achieved. The lower fuel consumption in the Du-CaL case is also associated with a smaller steam cycle which therefore produces a lower electrical power compared to the Integrated CaL case.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[0080] [1] IEA, Cement Technology Roadmap 2009: Carbon emissions reductions up to 2050, 2009. doi:10.1787/9789264088061; [0081] [2] B. Arias, M. E. Diego, J. C. Abanades, M. Lorenzo, L. Diaz, D. Martinez, J. Alvarez, A. Snchez-Biezma, Demonstration of steady state CO.sub.2 capture in a 1.7 MWth calcium looping pilot, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 18 (2013) 237-245. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.014; [0082] [3] J. Kremer, A. Galloy, J. Strohle, B. Epple, Continuous CO2 Capture in a 1-MW.sub.th Carbonate Looping Pilot Plant, Chem. Eng. Technol. 36 (2013) 1518-1524. doi:10.1002/ceat.201300084; [0083] [4] K. Atsonios, P. Grammelis, S. K. Antiohos, N. Nikolopoulos, E. Kakaras, Integration of calcium looping technology in existing cement plant for CO.sub.2capture: Process modeling and technical considerations, Fuel. 153 (2015) 210-223. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.084; [0084] [5] E. De Lena, M. Spinelli, I. Martinez, M. Gatti, R. Scaccabarozzi, G. Cinti, M. C. Romano, Process integration study of tail-end Ca-Looping process for CO.sub.2capture in cement plants, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 67 (2017) 71-92. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.10.005; [0085] [6] D. C. Ozcan, H. Ahn, S. Brandani, Process integration of a Ca-looping carbon capture process in a cement plant, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 19 (2013) 530-540. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.009; [0086] [7] B. Arias, M. Alonso, C. Abanades, CO2 Capture by Calcium Looping at Relevant Conditions for Cement Plants: Experimental Testing in a 30 kW th Pilot Plant, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56 (2017) 2634-2640. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04617; [0087] [8] M. Hornberger, R. Sprl, G. Scheffknecht, Calcium Looping for CO2 Capture in Cement PlantsPilot Scale Test, Energy Procedia. 114 (2017) 6171-6174. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1754; [0088] [9] N. Rodriguez, R. Murillo, J. C. Abanades, CO2 Capture from Cement Plants Using Oxyfired Precalcination and/or Calcium Looping, Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012) 2460-2466. doi:10.1021/es2030593; [0089] [10] M. C. Romano, M. Spinelli, S. Campanari, S. Consonni, M. Marchi, N. Pimpinelli, G. Cinti, The Calcium looping process for low CO2 emission cement plants, in: Elsevier Ltd, 2014: pp. 500-503. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1158; [0090] [11] E. De Lena, M. Spinelli, M. Gatti, R. Scaccabarozzi, S. Campanari, S. Consonni, G. Cinti, M. C. Romano, Techno-economic analysis of calcium looping processes for low CO2 emission cement plants, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 82 (2019) 244-260. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.005; [0091] [12] G. S. Grasa, J. C. Abanades, CO2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 8846-8851. doi:10.1021/ie0606946.