METHOD FOR SIMULATING ILLUMINATION AND IMAGING PROPERTIES OF AN OPTICAL PRODUCTION SYSTEM DURING THE ILLUMINATION AND IMAGING OF AN OBJECT BY MEANS OF AN OPTICAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
20240361704 ยท 2024-10-31
Inventors
- Klaus Gwosch (Aalen, DE)
- Markus Koch (Neu-Ulm, DE)
- Renzo Capelli (Heidenheim, DE)
- Matthias Roesch (Aalen, DE)
- Lars Stoppe (Jena, DE)
- Manuel Decker (Jena, DE)
Cpc classification
G03F7/70666
PHYSICS
G03F7/70625
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
When simulating illumination and imaging properties of an optical production system when illuminating and imaging an object by use of an optical measurement system of a metrology system, the optical measurement system having an illumination optical unit for illuminating the object and a pupil stop, in particular a displaceable pupil stop, and having an imaging optical unit for imaging the object into an image plane is initially provided. When simulating the properties of the optical production system with the optical measurement system, a plurality of pupil stops are initially provided. Measurement aerial images are then recorded by use of the plurality of pupil stops. A complex mask transfer function is reconstructed from the recorded measurement aerial images and a 3-D aerial image is determined from this function and the illumination setting of the optical production system. This yields an improved simulation method.
Claims
1. A method for simulating illumination and imaging properties of an optical production system during the illumination and imaging of an object by use of an optical measurement system of a metrology system, the optical measurement system comprising an illumination optical unit for illuminating the object having a pupil stop in the region of an illumination pupil in a k.sub.x, k.sub.y pupil plane, and an imaging optical unit for imaging the object into an image plane, comprising the following steps: providing a plurality of pupil stops for specifying different measurement illumination settings, recording measurement aerial images I.sub.meas (x, y) in the image plane by use of the plurality of pupil stops, reconstructing a complex mask transfer function from the recorded measurement aerial images (I.sub.meas), and determining a 3-D aerial image of the optical production system from the reconstructed mask transfer function and an illumination setting of the optical production system as the result of the simulation method.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical measurement system comprises a displacement drive for displacing the pupil stop in the k.sub.x- and/or k.sub.y-direction, the optical measurement system comprising an object holder that is displaceable perpendicular to an xy-object plane by actuator.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of pupil stops have in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations for specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the method furthermore includes the following steps: specifying a target pupil stop with a target stop boundary shape proceeding from an illumination setting of the optical production system, selecting at least one pupil stop from the plurality of pupil stops by use of an algorithm which qualifies deviations between the respective stop boundary shape of the pupil stops and the target stop boundary shape, specifying a plurality of defocus values z.sub.m as z-distances of an object holder position from the xy-object plane, and specifying a plurality of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the at least one selected pupil stop.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the measurement aerial images I.sub.meas (x, y) are recorded for a plurality of combinations of in each case a specified defocus value (z.sub.m) and a specified measurement position (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop, at all object holder positions assigned to the specified defocus values z.sub.m, with a plurality of the specified measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) being homed in on for at least one of the specified defocus values z.sub.m, for the respective recording of a measurement aerial image (I.sub.meas).
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the specified measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop include a central measurement position and a plurality of offset measurement positions surrounding said central measurement position.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the measurement aerial images (I.sub.meas) are recorded for at least the following defocus value/measurement position combinations: a central defocus value (z.sub.m) and a plurality of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop, defocus values (z.sub.min, z.sub.max) maximally offset from the central defocus value (z.sub.m) on both sides of the central defocus value (z.sub.m) perpendicular to the xy-object plane, and exactly one measurement position (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop at each location there.
8. The method of claim 4, wherein a comparison of locations of pupil spots of the target stop boundary shape with locations of pupil spots of the provided pupil stops is implemented when selecting the pupil stop.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein a mask spectrum dependent on the illumination direction is modelled during the reconstruction of the complex mask transfer function as a product of an illumination direction-independent mask spectrum and an illumination direction-dependent correction function.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical measurement system comprises an imaging pupil stop in the region of a pupil of the imaging optical unit, with a plurality of measurement positions of the imaging pupil stop being specified, a plurality of specified measurement positions of the imaging pupil stop being set when recording the measurement aerial images (I.sub.meas).
11. The method of claim 1, wherein imaging aberrations of the optical measurement system are taken into account when reconstructing the mask transfer function.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the 3-D aerial image is determined using a different illumination chief ray angle to the one used in the reconstruction of the mask transfer function.
13. A metrology system for carrying out a method as claimed in claim 1, the optical measurement system comprising an illumination optical unit for illuminating the object having a pupil stop in the region of an illumination pupil in a k.sub.x, k.sub.y pupil plane, and an imaging optical unit for imaging the object in the image plane.
14. The metrology system of claim 13, the optical measurement system comprising a displacement drive for displacing the pupil stop in the k.sub.x- and/or in the k.sub.y-direction, the optical measurement system comprising an object holder that is displaceable perpendicular to a xy-object plane by actuator.
15. The metrology system of claim 13, wherein the optical measurement system comprises a displacement drive for displacing, in the k.sub.x- and/or k.sub.y-direction, an imaging pupil stop arranged in the region of a pupil of the imaging optical unit.
16. The metrology system of claim 13, comprising a selection apparatus for selecting at least one pupil stop from a plurality of pupil stops, wherein the selection apparatus comprises a stop storage unit with a plurality of pupil stops, with in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations for specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings.
17. The metrology system of claim 14, wherein the optical measurement system comprises a displacement drive for displacing, in the k.sub.x- and/or k.sub.y-direction, an imaging pupil stop arranged in the region of a pupil of the imaging optical unit.
18. The metrology system of claim 14, comprising a selection apparatus for selecting at least one pupil stop from a plurality of pupil stops, wherein the selection apparatus comprises a stop storage unit with a plurality of pupil stops, with in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations for specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings.
19. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of pupil stops have in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations for specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings.
20. The method of claim 2, wherein the method furthermore includes the following steps: specifying a target pupil stop with a target stop boundary shape proceeding from an illumination setting of the optical production system, selecting at least one pupil stop from the plurality of pupil stops by use of an algorithm which qualifies deviations between the respective stop boundary shape of the pupil stops and the target stop boundary shape, specifying a plurality of defocus values z.sub.m as z-distances of an object holder position from the xy-object plane, and specifying a plurality of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the at least one selected pupil stop.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0025] Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in greater detail below with reference to the drawing, in which:
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] In order to facilitate the representation of positional relationships, a Cartesian xyz-coordinate system will be used hereinafter. In
[0042] In a view that corresponds to a meridional section,
[0043] An example of the test structure 5 is depicted in a plan view in
[0044] The metrology system 2 is used to analyze a three-dimensional (3-D) aerial image (aerial image metrology system). One application is found in the simulation of an aerial image of a lithography mask, in the way that the aerial image would also appear in an optical production system of a producing projection exposure apparatus, for example in a scanner. To this end, an imaging quality of the metrology system 2 itself, in particular, can be measured and optionally adjusted. Consequently, the analysis of the aerial image can serve to determine the imaging quality of a projection optical unit of the metrology system 2, or else to determine the imaging quality of, in particular, projection optical units within a projection exposure apparatus. Metrology systems are known from WO 2016/012426 A1, from US 2013/0063716 A1 (cf.
[0045] The illumination light 1 is reflected and diffracted at the test structure 5. A plane of incidence of the illumination light 1 is parallel to the yz-plane in the case of the central, initial illumination.
[0046] The EUV illumination light 1 is produced by an EUV light source 8. The light source 8 can be a laser plasma source (LPP; laser produced plasma) or a discharge source (DPP; discharge produced plasma). In principle, a synchrotron-based light source can also be used, e.g. a free electron laser (FEL). A used wavelength of the EUV light source can range between 5 nm and 30 nm. In principle, in one variant of the metrology system 2, a light source for another used light wavelength can also be used instead of the light source 8, for example a light source for a used wavelength of 193 nm.
[0047] An illumination optical unit 9 of the metrology system 2 is arranged between the light source 8 and the test structure 5. The illumination optical unit 9 serves for the illumination of the test structure 5 to be examined, with a defined illumination intensity distribution over the object field 3 and at the same time with a defined illumination angle distribution with which the field points of the object field 3 are illuminated. Such an illumination angle distribution is also referred to as illumination setting.
[0048] The respective illumination angle distribution of the illumination light 1 is specified by way of a pupil stop 10, which is arranged in an illumination optical unit pupil plane 11. The pupil stop 10 is also referred to as a sigma stop.
[0049]
[0050]
[0051] Further variants of pupil stops 10 with a central passage pole I of increasingly larger radius are shown in
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056] Corresponding annular illumination settings can be realized using the embodiments of the pupil stops 10 according to
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074] Measured from the x-coordinate of the pupil stop 10 of
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082] The pupil stop 10 of the illumination optical unit 9 is embodied as a stop which is displaceable in driven fashion and which is arranged in front of the object plane 4 in an illumination light beam path 15 of the illumination light 1. A drive unit used for the driven displacement of the pupil stop 10 is depicted at 16 in
[0083] With the aid of the displacement drive 16, it is possible to displace the selected pupil stop 10 along the pupil coordinates k.sub.x and k.sub.y in the pupil plane 11.
[0084] The displacement drive 16 may also include a stop interchange unit, by means of which a specific pupil stop 10 is replaced with another, specific pupil stop 10. To this end, the stop interchange unit may take the respective selected pupil stop from a stop storage unit and return the replaced stop to this stop storage unit.
[0085] The test structure 5 is held by an object holder 17 of the metrology system 2. The object holder 17 cooperates with an object displacement drive 18 for displacing the test structure 5, in particular along the z-coordinate.
[0086] Following reflection at the test structure 5, the electromagnetic field of the illumination light 1 has a distribution 19 which is depicted in
[0087] The illumination light 1 reflected by the test structure 5 enters an imaging optical unit or projection optical unit 20 of the metrology system 2.
[0088] A diffraction spectrum 21 arises in a pupil plane of the projection optical unit 20 on account of the periodicity of the test structure 5 (cf.
[0089] In the diffraction spectrum 21, the 0th order of diffraction of the test structure 5 is present centrally. In addition,
[0090] The orders of diffraction of the diffraction spectrum 21 depicted in
[0091] The imaging pupil stop 23 is operatively connected to a displacement drive 25, the function of which corresponds to that of the displacement drive 16 for the sigma stop 10.
[0092]
[0093]
[0094] The pupils 24 (cf.
[0095] Firstly, the images of the 1st, 0th and +1st orders of diffraction and, secondly, an imaging contribution of the optical system, specifically the projection optical unit 20, contribute to the intensity distribution in the exit pupil 26. This imaging contribution which is elucidated in
[0096] The projection optical unit 20 images the test structure 5 towards a spatially resolving detection device 27 of the metrology system 2. The detection device 27 is in the form of a camera, in particular a CCD camera or CMOS camera.
[0097] The projection optical unit 20 is embodied as magnifying optical unit. A magnification factor of the projection optical unit 20 may be greater than 10, may be greater than 50, may be greater than 100 and may even be greater still. As a rule, this magnification factor is less than 1000.
[0098] In a manner corresponding to
[0099]
[0100] The following procedure is carried out to simulate the illumination and imaging properties of the optical production system when illuminating and imaging the object, using the example of the test structure 5, by use of the optical measurement system 1 of the metrology system 2:
[0101] Initially, a plurality of pupil stops 10 with in each case different stop boundary shapes are provided for the purposes of specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings. This is implemented by providing pupil stops 10, for example in the style of the pupil stops 10 of
[0102] Then, a target pupil stop with a target stop boundary shape is specified proceeding from an illumination setting of the optical production system to be simulated. The target pupil stop can be an arrangement of a plurality or multiplicity of individual pupil spots or stop spots. In this case, the intensity of individual illumination spots or pupil spots generally differs between the individual spots.
[0103]
[0104]
[0105] The target pupil stop 36 can be specified by way of a definition of appropriate stop aperture contours, especially continuous stop aperture contours. Such stop aperture contours can be described by polygonal chains, for example.
[0106] These continuous openings are then approximated by a finite number of pupil spots 37 within the openings. These spots are depicted in
[0107] For the specific example in
[0108] The finer the grid of illumination spots, the more accurately the actual stop shape can be approximated.
[0109]
[0110] Proceeding from this target pupil stop 36, at least one pupil stop 10 is then selected from the provided plurality of pupil stops 10 by use of an algorithm which qualifies deviations between the respective stop boundary shape of the provided pupil stops 10 and the target stop boundary shape of the target pupil stop 36. To this end, the pupil stop 10 currently under examination during the selection (also referred to as pupil stop to be qualified below) can in turn be decomposed within its stop boundary into a plurality of pupil spots 38 arranged in grid-like fashion and represented by circles in
[0111] The scope of qualification comprises determining the similarity between the target illumination pupil (also denoted T below) and the possible measurement stops 10 (also denoted M below). For instance, this can be implemented by calculating an overlap function Q.
[0112] Here, A is a function for (approximately) calculating the area. The first term corresponds to the normalized area of the overlap between measurement stop and target illumination pupil. The second and third terms correspond to the normalized difference area between the measurement stop and the target illumination pupil, and vice versa. The difference area is intended to refer to the area contained only in the first pupil and not in the second.
[0113] The operators , and \ correspond to the intersection (), union () and relative complement (\) operators from set theory. In this case, the intersection M.sub.1M.sub.2 of the sets/areas M.sub.1 and M.sub.2 is intended to mean the set/area which is contained both in M.sub.1 and in M.sub.2, i.e. corresponds to the overlap area of M.sub.1 and M.sub.2. The union M.sub.1 M.sub.2 of the sets/areas M.sub.1 and M.sub.2 describes the set/area which is contained in M.sub.1 or M.sub.2, i.e. corresponds to the overall area covered by M.sub.1 or M.sub.2. The relative complement M.sub.1\M.sub.2 of the sets/areas M.sub.1 and M.sub.2 describes the set/area which is covered by M.sub.1 but not contained in M.sub.2.
[0114] For instance, the area function A can be implemented as counting illumination spots in the pupil. To this end, the target illumination pupil and measurement pupil are equipped with the same grid. Typically, the grid corresponds to the pupil facet grid in the scanner on which the target illumination pupil is sampled (cf.
[0115] Thus, the selection of the pupil stop 10 encompasses a comparison between the poses of pupil spots 37 of the target stop boundary shape and the poses of pupil spots 38 of the provided pupil stops 10.
[0116] Moreover, a plurality of defocus values z.sub.m (cf.
[0117] Moreover, a plurality of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the selected pupil stop 10 are specified within the scope of the simulation method.
[0118] Now, measurement aerial images I(x, y) in the style of the intensity distributions 31 according to
[0119] The sequence in
[0120]
[0121] In comparison with the imaging pupil stop 23,
[0122] In comparison with the centered position according to
[0123] An alternative sequence of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop 10 is depicted in
[0124]
[0125]
[0126] Relative to the imaging pupil stop 23,
[0127] Relative to the imaging pupil stop 23,
[0128] Relative to the imaging pupil stop 23,
[0129] The completed sequence of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) is shown in
[0130]
[0131] The selection of the respective measurement position sequence, or optionally a subset therefrom, is implemented on the basis of the arrangement of individual structures of the test structure 5 and/or on the basis of the illumination setting of the optical production system to be simulated. For instance, the measurement position sequence can be selected in a manner analogous to the stop selection algorithm (see above), with all stop positions of a sequence being taken into account and the sequence being selected for which the overlap of the measurement sequence with the target illumination pupil is maximal.
[0132] The poses of the pupil stop 10 which differ from the center position in terms of the relative pose with respect to the imaging pupil stop 23 are also referred to as offset measurement positions. Within the scope of a measurement position sequence, two to ten such offset measurement positions can be homed in on, this typically being two to five offset measurement positions, for example three or four offset measurement positions. The offset measurement positions can be arranged uniformly distributed in the circumferential direction. To reduce the measurement time, it is also possible to use only a subset, e.g. every second measurement position, from the measurement schemes (
[0133] The specified defocus values z.sub.m are all measured with the aid of the respective measurement position sequence. In an alternative, it is possible that the entire respective measurement position sequence is used only for one defocus value or for individual defocus values z.sub.m, with the measurement aerial images being recorded for fewer measurement positions of the pupil stop relative to the imaging pupil stop 23 in the case of other defocus values z.sub.m. In an extreme case, it is possible for example to home in on the full measurement position sequence and record a respective measurement aerial image there for only one defocus value z.sub.m, whereas the measurement aerial image I.sub.meas(x, y) is only recorded at one respective measurement position, in particular for the case of the centered pupil stop 10, in the case of the other specified defocus values z.sub.m.
[0134] For instance, the following defocus value/measurement position combinations can be recorded: A central defocus value z.sub.m and a plurality of measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop 10, i.e., in particular, a centered measurement position and a plurality of offset measurement positions, and defocus values z.sub.min, z.sub.max maximally offset from the central defocus value on both sides, with exactly one central measurement position (k.sub.x, k.sub.y) of the pupil stop 10 being adopted at these positions z.sub.min, z.sub.max.
[0135] Then, a complex mask transfer function is reconstructed from the totality of measurement aerial images recorded with the selected pupil stop 10. A similar reconstruction step is also described in DE 10 2019 215 800 A1.
[0136] The reconstruction is implemented within the scope of a modelled description, within which the projection optical unit 20 of the metrology system 2 with the illumination setting specified by the pupil stop 10 is described by a function ({right arrow over (p)}) which reproduces the illumination directions {right arrow over (p)} which are passed through the pupil stop 10. A displacement of the pupil stop 10 by a vector {right arrow over (q)} with absolute coordinate values k.sub.x and k.sub.y leads to a displaced illumination function ({right arrow over (p)}{right arrow over (q)}).
[0137] Each illumination direction generates a complex-valued field distribution m({right arrow over (r)},{right arrow over (p)}) (cf. the field distribution 19 in
is the curtailment by the numerical aperture of the imaging optical unit 20, that is to say by the imaging pupil stop 23, and
is a wavefront error caused by a defocus z (displacement by the object holder 17). The propagated spectrum (cf.
In this case, {right arrow over (r)} is the xy-position of the intensity measurement, i.e. the respective pixel of the camera 27.
[0138] The object now is to determine the mask spectrum M({right arrow over (k)},{right arrow over (p)}). In this case, k is the pupil coordinates in the entrance pupil 24 of the projection optical unit 20 and {right arrow over (p)} is the illumination direction. The Fourier transform of the respective mask spectrum is the associated mask transfer function.
[0139] The reconstructed spectra can then be used to calculate the aerial image for any other illumination setting .sub.target({right arrow over (p)})) and any defocus z.sub.target.
[0140] The determination of M({right arrow over (k)},{right arrow over (p)}) can be formulated as an optimization problem: Sought are the spectra M({right arrow over (k)},{right arrow over (p)}) for which there is a minimum deviation F between the simulated aerial images and the aerial images I.sub.meas measured at the defocus positions z.sub.1, z.sub.2 . . . z.sub.N and the illumination directions {right arrow over (q)}.sub.1, {right arrow over (q)}.sub.2 . . . {right arrow over (q)}.sub.M. The following optimization problem should be solved:
A separate spectrum needs to be reconstructed for each illumination direction 5. As a rule, the optimization problem is underdetermined. There are various options for handling this problem.
[0141] The simplest solution is a Hopkins approximation, which assumes that the spectrum is only displaced by the same value in the case of a displacement of the illumination direction, that is to say M({right arrow over (k)},{right arrow over (p)})=M.sub.0({right arrow over (k)}{right arrow over (p)}). As a result, there now is only still one spectrum that it needs to be reconstructed. The angle dependence of the reflectivity, shadowing effects and mask-induced aberrations means that the dependence of the mask spectrum on the illumination direction is not completely negligible in the case of real EUV lithography masks as test structures 5. The Hopkins approximation is stretched to its limits.
[0142] To take account of the dependence of the spectrum and the illumination direction 5, the following ansatz can be considered for the angle-dependent spectrum M of the test structure 5:
[0143] In this case, M.sub.0({right arrow over (k)}) is a spectrum that is independent of the illumination direction, in a manner analogous to the Hopkins approximation. C({right arrow over (k)},{right arrow over (p)},{right arrow over ()}) is any complex-valued function albeit defined prior to the reconstruction, which models the dependence of the amplitude and phase on the illumination direction. .sub.1 . . . N are free parameters, which are determined within the scope of the optimization.
[0144] By way of example, the following the function C({right arrow over (k)}, {right arrow over (p)}, .sub.1, .sub.2, . . . , .sub.N) could be used:
Within the scope of reconstructing the complex mask transfer function M, a mask spectrum M({right arrow over (p)}) that is dependent on the illumination direction is modelled as a product of a spectrum that is independent of the illumination direction and a correction function (C({right arrow over (k)}, {right arrow over (p)}, {right arrow over ()}.sub.1, {right arrow over ()}.sub.2, . . . , .sub.N)).
[0145] Now, the mask spectrum M.sub.0({right arrow over (k)}) and the parameters .sub.1 . . . N which minimize the difference between measured and simulated aerial images are sought after. The following optimization problem is solved:
Thus, the number of free parameters is only increased by N vis-a-vis the Hopkins approximation, with N typically being small.
[0146] Using the reconstructed, now directionally dependent spectrum, it is possible to calculate a simulated aerial image I.sub.sim for the target illumination setting G.sub.target and the target defocus z.sub.target:
Equation (6) then allows comparison between the simulated aerial image I.sub.sim and the respectively measured aerial image I.sub.meas, and this can be used to reconstruct the mask spectrum M and, accordingly, the complex mask transfer function.
[0147] From Equation (6), the 3-D aerial image can be calculated with the aid of the reconstructed mask transfer function M and the illumination setting G.sub.target of the optical production system. In this way, it is possible to ascertain what the aerial image of the test structure 5 would look like if it were imaged by the optical production system.
[0148] In a variant of the simulation method, it is also possible to use a plurality of different pupil stops 10 to specify the various measurement positions (k.sub.x, k.sub.y).
[0149] To prepare the simulation method, it is possible to record an aerial image stack in order to make sure which z-pose of the object plane 4 supplies an optimally sharp image in the image plane 29 (zero of the z-pose).
[0150] z-increments which are used in Equation (6) when determining the aerial image I.sub.sim may differ from the defocus values z.sub.m that are specified within the scope of the simulation method.
[0151] Pixel sizes of the recorded measurement aerial images I.sub.meas may be re-sampled for the purpose of matching to a desired pixel resolution.
[0152] A plurality of k.sub.x, k.sub.y positions of the imaging pupil stop 23 can also be set by way of the displacement drive 25 in a simulation method.
[0153] When reconstructing the mask transfer function, it is accordingly possible to take account of imaging aberrations of the optical measurement system, in particular imaging aberrations of the imaging optical unit 20 of the metrology system 2.
[0154] The determination of the 3-D aerial image I.sub.meas and/or the calculation of the simulated aerial image I.sub.sim may be carried out using a different illumination chief ray angle to that of the reconstruction of the mask transfer function.
[0155] For selecting the respective pupil stop 10 from the provided plurality of pupil stops 10 with in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations, the metrology system 2 has a selection apparatus not depicted in detail in the drawing. This selection apparatus has a stop storage unit, in which the plurality of pupil stops 10 with in each case different stop boundary shapes and/or stop boundary orientations are stored for the purpose of specifying correspondingly different measurement illumination settings.
[0156] In the selection step of the simulation method, the last pupil stop inserted is firstly removed from its use location in the pupil plane 11 and supplied to the stop storage unit in the selection apparatus with the aid of an actuator system of the selection apparatus, in particular with the aid of a robotic actuator system. Subsequently, the pupil stop 10 selected according to the simulation method is selected from the stop storage unit and inserted in the use position in the pupil plane 11 with the aid of the robotic actuator system.