Full characterization wavefront sensor

Abstract

Sensors, devices, apparatus, systems and methods for replacing microlens arrays with one or more switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays for providing measurements of wavefronts and intensity distribution in light beams with high spatial resolution with a single optical radiation sensor. The device acts like a conventional Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor when the microlens array elements are in focusing state, and the device performs light beam intensity profile characterization acting as a beam profiler when the optical power of lens array elements is switched off.

Claims

1. A Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, comprising: a sequence of switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays in series; an optical sensor array having an output; and an electronics system for reading, analyzing and displaying the output of the optical sensor array in order to derive the phase of optical wavefronts and intensity distribution in a beam incident on the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.

2. The wavefront sensor of claim 1 in which the sequence of switchable microlens arrays comprises at least one switchable diffractive waveplate liquid crystal microlens arrays.

3. The wavefront sensor of claim 1 in which the electronics system for reading, analyzing and displaying the output of the optical sensor array allows measurements of a wavefront and intensity distribution of the incident beam for varying settings of the switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays.

4. The wavefront sensor of claim 1 in which at least two switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays in the sequence have the same microlens pitch.

5. The wavefront sensor of claim 1 in which at least part of the switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays in the sequence have a different pitch.

6. The wavefront sensor of claim 1, further comprising a circular polarizer at the input of the optical sensor array.

7. A Shack-Hartmann sensor system, comprising: a sequence of at least two switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays in series for receiving an optical wavefront; and an optical sensor array having a plurality of pixels, wherein the sequence of at least two switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays focuses the optical wavefront on a focal spot of the optical sensor array for the Shack-Hartmann sensor system.

8. The sensor system of claim 7, wherein the sequence of the at least two switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays includes: a first switchable microlens array in parallel and spaced apart from a second switchable microlens array.

9. The sensor system of claim 7, wherein the optical detector array includes: a focal plane array (FPA).

10. The sensor system of claim 7, wherein the optical sensor array includes: a CCD (charge-coupled device) array.

11. The sensor system of claim 7, wherein the optical sensor array includes: a CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor) array.

12. A Shack-Hartmann sensor system for wavefront and intensity profile measurement of light beams, comprising: a sequence of diffractive waveplate microlens arrays in series, wherein optical power of the sequence of diffractive waveplate microlens arrays is cycled between focusing and non-focusing states allowing to combine wavefront measurement of a light beam in focusing state with beam intensity profile measurement in non-focusing state for the Shack-Hartmann sensor system.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 illustrates prior art of wavefront characterization using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.

(2) FIG. 2 illustrates the prior art optical layout of one single microlens of the microlens array used in Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors, and the CCD, CMOS, or other type of photodetector pixels associated with said single microlens.

(3) FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the optical layout of one embodiment of the present invention in which the single non-switchable microlens array of the prior art is replaced with two switchable microlens arrays. In the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, each switchable microlens array is at a different distance from the CCD, CMOS, or other focal plane array (FPA). The pitches of the two switchable microlens arrays in the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B are the same.

(4) FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the optical layout of another embodiment of the present invention in which the single non-switchable microlens array of the prior art is replaced with two switchable microlens arrays. In the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, each switchable microlens array is at essentially the same distance from the CCD, CMOS, or other FPA. The pitches of the two switchable microlens arrays in the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B are different.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(5) Before explaining the disclosed embodiments of the present invention in detail it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its applications to the details of the particular arrangements shown since the invention is capable of other embodiments. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.

(6) In the Summary above and in the accompanying drawings, reference is made to particular features (including method steps) of the invention. It is to be understood that the disclosure of the invention in this specification does not include all possible combinations of such particular features. For example, where a particular feature is disclosed in the context of a particular aspect or embodiment of the invention, that feature can also be used, to the extent possible, in combination with and/or in the context of other particular aspects and embodiments of the invention, and in the invention generally.

(7) In this section, some embodiments of the invention will be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.

(8) The present invention includes devices, apparatus, systems and methods for creating a wavefront sensor that can more fully characterize an optical beam, such as a laser beam, than is possible employing sensors based on the prior art. In particular, methods are disclosed to replace the single, static (non-switchable) microlens array employed in prior art with one or more switchable microlens arrays.

(9) A list of the components in the figures will now be described. 101 optical wavefront 102 micro lens array 103 focal plane array (FPA) 104 individual micro lens 105 focused area 106 expanded (enlarged) pixel 107 focal spot 108 position if optical beam were a plane wave 201 input wavefront 202 optical axis 203 microlens 204 photodetector optical array (CCD, CMOS, or other FPA) 205 focal spot 301 optical wavefront 302 optical axis 303 first switchable microlens 304 second switchable microlens 305 optical array (CCD, CMOS or other FPA) 401 input wavefront 402 axis 403 microlens 404, 405 half microlens 406 optical array (CCD, CMOS or other FPA)

(10) FIG. 1 illustrates the optical layout and function of a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor using prior art. An optical wavefront 101 with spatially-dependent direction of propagation is incident on a wavefront sensor that includes a microlens array 102 and a CCD (charge-coupled device), CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor), or other FPA (focal plane array) 103. The microlens array can consist of a plurality of individual microlenses such as 104. The optical radiation from each microlens is focused into an area 105 of the FPA 103 that contains an integer number of pixels along each axis.

(11) For the specific case illustrate in FIG. 1, each microlens brings light to a focus within an area 105 of the FPA 103 that can be, for purposes of illustration, 4 pixels by 4 pixels in area. For example, microlens 104 focuses light into area 105 that consists of 16 pixels, with an extent of 4 pixels in the horizontal direction and 4 pixels in the vertical direction.

(12) An expanded view 106 of this 4 pixel by 4 pixel region is shown in FIG. 1. In this expanded view, a focal spot 107 is indicated. The focal spot 107 is offset by a distance x in the horizontal direction, and y in the vertical direction, from the position 108 that the focal spot would occupy if the input optical beam were a plane wave with a propagation direction perpendicular to the parallel planes of the microlens array 102 and the FPA 103. The centroid offsets x and y, in combination with the focal length of the microlenses, can be used by the wavefront sensor to determine the slope of the wavefront at each microlens of the array.

(13) FIG. 2 further illustrates the optical layout and function of a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor using the prior art. In FIG. 2 the optical layout is shown that allows the local slope of the input wavefront 201 to be measured relative to the optical axis 202 of an individual microlens 203. A plurality of CCD, CMOS, or other photodetector pixels 204 is used to determine the offset of the focal spot centroid 205 from the axis 202 of the microlens 203. The local angular offset a of the direction of beam propagation relative to the optical axis 202 is determined by dividing the offset of the centroid by the focal length f of the microlens.

(14) The constraints on measurements by the wavefront sensor based on prior art can be illustrated by reference to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. With a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor based on the prior art, the slope of the wavefront is measured with a spatial sampling period equal to the pitch of the microlens array 102 in FIG. 1. In this context, pitch of the microlens array means the center-to-center separation of adjacent microlenses comprising the microlens array. The signal level in the focal spot (107 in FIGS. 1 and 205 in FIG. 2) is a measure of the average beam power density over the area of the individual microlens, so the spatial sampling period for beam power density is the same as the spatial sampling period of the wavefront slope, and is equal to the pitch of the microlens array. The maximum wavefront angle relative to an axis perpendicular to the plane of the microlens array and the plane of the FPA that can be measured with the wavefront sensor architecture illustrated in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 is approximately one half the diameter of the microlens divided by the focal length f of the microlens for typical image processing methods.

(15) Using the prior art methods illustrated in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the spatial sample period and the range of wavefront slopes are fixed by the design of the sensor, and the spatial sampling period of beam power density is the same as for wavefront slope, and equal to the pitch of the microlens array. Although these constraints are fixed for a given wavefront sensor design, users are confronted with a wide variety of measurement requirements that may or may not fall within the measurement constraints of a single wavefront sensor. As noted, some manufacturers resort to providing field-replaceable microlens arrays in order to provide some flexibility in measurement capability, but this approach prevents rapid adaptation of a single sensor to new measurement requirements.

(16) The possibility of the user of a wavefront sensor of the Shack Hartmann type electronically switching the optical characteristics of a microlens array, instead of the user having to physically replace one fixed microlens array with another fixed microlens array with different optical characteristics, such as focal length and pitch is enabled by the recent development of switchable diffractive waveplate lenses. Particularly, the lens array function can be switched off altogether allowing high resolution imaging of the beam intensity profile.

(17) Such switchable diffractive waveplate lenses are described and shown, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/688,256 filed Apr. 16, 2015 to Tabirian et al. entitled Diffractive Waveplate Lenses for Correcting Aberrations and Polarization-Independent Functionality, which is co-assigned to the same assignee as the subject invention, and which is incorporated by reference in its' entirety. Such devices can be fabricated in many forms, including as microlens arrays, and the like.

(18) An additional possible form of the microlens array of the present invention is that of an array of liquid crystal microlenses. Such microlenses can be produced, in particular, between two glass substrates comprising transparent electrodes such as Indium Thin Oxide (ITO), Graphene, Graphene oxide based compositions, and the like. Liquid crystal polymer microlenses can be combined with a liquid crystal variable half-wave phase retarder in-between to provide switching function between non-focusing and focusing states.

(19) As a first embodiment of the present invention, the fixed, static microlens array 102 of FIG. 1 of the prior art would be replaced with a switchable microlens array. Consecutive measurements would be made with the microlens array switched on for wavefront slope measurements, and with the microlens array switched off for measurements of the spatial distribution of beam power density. This would greatly reduce the spatial sampling period of the beam power density, thereby providing a much more complete spatial beam profile than is provided by Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors based on prior art.

(20) As an example, Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors currently available for purchase, employing CCD or CMOS image sensors, are such that the pitch of the microlens array is 30 to 65 times the pitch of the CCD or CMOS image sensor, and (as previously noted) the spatial sampling period for both wavefront slope and beam power density is equal to the pitch of the microlens array. If the microlens array could be switched off, the same CCD or CMOS image sensor could be used to sample the beam power density with a sampling period 30 to 65 times smaller than is the case with these existing available Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.

(21) A first embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B. In this embodiment, the single unswitched microlens array of a wavefront sensor such as the one illustrated in FIG. 1 is replaced by two switchable microlens arrays at different distances from the FPA. In the embodiment of the present invention illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, an optical wavefront 301 that is propagating nearly parallel to optical axis 302 is incident on a first switchable microlens 303, one of the microlenses of a microlens array, followed by a second switchable microlens 304.

(22) As was the case illustrated in FIG. 2 for the prior art case of a single non-switchable microlens, the microlenses 303 and 304 in FIGS. 3A and 3B are single elements of an array of microlenses. In FIG. 3A, the microlens array furthest from the CCD, CMOS, or other FPA brings the input radiation to a focus on Pixel 1 of the FPA 305. As is evident for the example illustrated in FIG. 3A, the wavefront slope is so great and the angle that the local optical propagation direction makes with the optical axis 302 is so large that the focal spot is at the edge of the set of pixels 305 associated with the microlenses 303 and 304. If the microlens array of which microlens 303 is a part is switched off, and the microlens array of which microlens 304 is a part is switched on, as illustrated in FIG. 3B, then the focal spot is brought to a focus on the FPA pixels 305 at a position closer to the axis. This is because the focal length f.sub.2 of microlens 304 is shorter than the focal length f.sub.1 of microlens 303.

(23) From the user point of view, the major difference between the sensor configuration illustrated in FIG. 3A and the sensor configuration illustrated in FIG. 3B is that the precision with which wavefront slopes can be measured is higher in the configuration of FIG. 3A, but the range of measureable wavefront slopes is greater for the configuration of FIG. 3B. Depending on the characteristics of the wavefront to be measured, either one of the configurations illustrated in FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B could be closer to optimal. By providing the ability to switch the lenses on and off, the sensor can provide closer to an optimal combination of wavefront slope range and precision for a wider variety of wavefronts than would be the case with a fixed microlens array.

(24) A second embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B. In this embodiment, there are again two switchable microlens arrays as was the case for the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B. However, for the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the focal lengths of the two microlens arrays are different, whereas in the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the focal lengths of the two microlens arrays are the same.

(25) Also, for the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the pitches of the two microlens arrays are the same, whereas in the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the pitch of the microlens array that includes microlenses 404 and 405 is half as large as the pitch of the microlens array that includes microlens 403. Therefore, for the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the spatial sampling density of the incoming wavefront slope can be adjusted by switching one or the other of the two microlenses on or off.

(26) FIGS. 4A and 4B give examples of two wavefront measurement cases.

(27) In FIG. 4A an example is illustrated in which the angle between the direction of propagation of the input wavefront 401 relative to the optical axis 402 of the microlens 403 varies slowly with transverse position, so the large pitch of the microlens array of which microlens 403 is a part is sufficient.

(28) In FIG. 4B an example is illustrated in which the angular offset of the direction of wavefront propagation of the input wavefront 407 from the optical axes 408 and 409 varies from a relatively large value at the center of microlens 405 to a smaller value at the center of microlens 404. The configuration of FIG. 4A allows more precise measurement of wavefront slope over a wider range of wavefront slopes than the configuration of FIG. 4B, but the configuration of FIG. 4B allows measurements of wavefront slope with higher rates of change of wavefront slope with transverse position than does the configuration of FIG. 4A.

(29) The size of sensor array elements 406 in FIG. 4B can be as small as approximately 3 micrometers and as large as approximately 30 micrometers with sensitivity from UV (ultra violet) to infrared wavelengths. The output signal of the optical sensors is transferred to an electronics system for processing and display 410 such as a computer.

(30) Depending on the characteristics of the wavefront to be measured, either one of the configurations illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B could be closer to optimal. By providing the ability to switch the lenses on and off, the sensor can provide closer to an optimal combination of wavefront slope range and sampling period for a wider variety of wavefronts than would be the case with a fixed microlens array. Example of wavefronts includes parabolic profiles typically outputted by conventional lenses, spiral wavefronts outputted by spiral phase plates, and complex irregular wavefronts obtained in solid state laser beams, etc.

(31) For any embodiment of the disclosed invention, it would be possible to take advantage of the capabilities of the switchable microlens array by employing software that adapts the sensor configuration to the measured wavefront, or makes consecutive measurements of the same wavefront in multiple configurations of the sensor in order to enhance the accuracy and completeness of the wavefront characterization.

(32) As will be evident to those skilled in the art, there are many variations of the disclosed invention, including, but not limited to, the use of different types of FPAs for wavefront sensors operating in different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum; various combinations of different types of switchable diffractive waveplate microlens arrays; polarization selectors to optimize the wavefront measurement capability and account for the dependence on light polarization of the focusing properties of diffractive waveplate elements; switchable diffractive microlens arrays based on switchable liquid crystal microlenses; and the ability to select (either automatically or manually) one or more switchable microlens arrays that are optimal for a particular range of wavefront wavelengths.

(33) The term approximately can be +/10% of the amount referenced. Additionally, preferred amounts and ranges can include the amounts and ranges referenced without the prefix of being approximately.

(34) While the invention has been described, disclosed, illustrated and shown in various terms of certain embodiments or modifications which it has presumed in practice, the scope of the invention is not intended to be, nor should it be deemed to be, limited thereby and such other modifications or embodiments as may be suggested by the teachings herein are particularly reserved especially as they fall within the breadth and scope of the claims here appended.