SURFACE MODIFICATION OF STAINLESS STEELS

Abstract

A process involves the continuous surface treatment of stainless steel coils with aqueous suspensions of rare earth oxide nano or micro particles or aqueous rare earth nitrate solutions of nano or micro particles. The surface treatment can be applied by roll coating, spraying or other conventional application techniques. The treated material in coil form is then heated in an annealing box using an open coil process whereby a wire is placed between coil laps to promote uniform atmosphere exposure. The atmosphere can be reducing or oxidizing and the times can vary from 1 hr to 100 hr. The atmosphere can also be wet (high dew point) or dry (low dew point). The surface treatment promotes a more uniform color to the subsequently developed oxide formed during anneal-type heat treatment. It also improves corrosion resistance of the processed stainless steel material. Materials treated in this manner are suitable for a variety of applications in the building systems, automotive and appliance markets.

Claims

1. A process for modifying the surface of stainless steel strip comprising: Subjecting a coil of stainless steel strip having two sides to an open coil anneal process at a temperature of about 1000? F. to about 1800? F. for about 1 hour to greater than 72 hours.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein, prior to subjecting the coil of stainless steel strip to an open coil anneal process, coating said stainless steel strip on at least one of the said sides with at least one of an aqueous suspension comprising a rare earth oxide or an aqueous solution comprising a rare earth nitrate.

3. The process of claim 2, wherein the rare earth oxide comprises nanoparticles.

4. The process of claim 2, wherein the rare earth oxide comprises microparticles.

5. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the open coil anneal process is performed in a dry atmosphere with a dewpoint of less than about 0? F.

6. The process of claim 5, wherein the dewpoint is less than about ?40? F.

7. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the open coil anneal process is performed in a wet atmosphere with a dewpoint of more than 60? F.

8. The process of claim 7, wherein the open coil anneal process is performed in a wet atmosphere with a dewpoint of more than 80? F.

9. The process of claim 2, wherein the coating leaves a residue of a rare earth oxide in the range of about 300 to about 3000 ?g/m.sup.2.

10. The process of claim 9, wherein the residue of the rare earth oxide is in the range of 500 to about 1000 ?g/m.sup.2.

11. The process of claim 1, wherein, prior to subjecting the stainless strip to an open coil anneal process, at least one side of said stainless steel strip treated so as to impart to said side a surface finish selected from the group consisting of 2B, 2D, #4 Polish, ESD, and Greystone finishes.

12. The process of claim 2, wherein, prior to coating said stainless steel strip, at least one side of said stainless steel strip treated so as to impart to said side a surface finish selected from the group consisting of 2B, 2D, #4 Polish, ESD, and Greystone finishes.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0008] FIG. 1 depicts Glow Discharge Spectroscopy (GDS) analysis of a Chromeshield? 22 stainless steel sample that has not undergone any surface treatment or OCA.

[0009] FIG. 2 depicts GDS analysis of a Chromeshield 22 stainless steel sample that has undergone an OCA process.

[0010] FIG. 3 depicts GDS analysis of a Chromeshield 22 stainless steel sample that has undergone application of a yttria nanoparticle suspension and OCA.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0011] A surface treatment of stainless steel coils with aqueous suspensions of rare earth oxides or aqueous rare earth nitrate solutions, such as those containing yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, or zirconium provides a unique surface finish that provides both functional and aesthetic benefits. In certain embodiments, the same benefits are obtained with aqueous suspensions of microparticles rather than nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are defined as particles with dimensions from 0.1-100 nm and microparticles are defined as particles with dimensions from 0.1-100 ?m. Rare earth particles include those containing yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, or zirconium. One such suspension is Minimox? yttria nanoparticle suspension, available from Materials Interface, Inc. of Sussex, Wis.

[0012] The surface treatment can be applied to a coil of stainless steel by roll coating, spraying or other conventional application techniques. Subsequent drying in the range of 70-300? F. (21-149? C.) is only needed to remove the water component of the suspension or solution. Thus, the drying leaves a residue of the rare earth compound in the range of 300 to 3000 ?g/m.sup.2, or in some embodiments 500-1000 ?g/m.sup.2. The surface treatment promotes a more uniform color to the subsequently developed oxide formed during anneal. When a nitrate-containing starting material is used as the surface treatment, it is changed to an oxide during the anneal process. The surface treatment, and resulting oxide coating on the stainless steel, also improves corrosion resistance of the processed material.

[0013] The coated coil is annealed using an open coil process where the coil of steel is loosely wrapped so that the gaseous atmosphere can circulate around each layer (or lap) of the wound steel strip. Annealing times can vary from 30 minutes to 5 days. Surface finishes such as #4 Polish or other finish known in the art may be imparted to the strip prior to OCA.

[0014] The stainless steel coils (before or after final anneal, and after coating with the surface treatment suspension or solution) are rewound, for example, with a separating wire between laps and placed in a box where they are open coil annealed (OCA) in a desired atmosphere at temperatures from about 1000 to 1800? F. This open coil can be prepared, for example, by inserting a wire or twisted wire, preferably from 0.070 to 0.150 inches (0.18-0.38 cm) in diameter, between the windings of the coil providing separation between laps so that the annealing gas transmission through the coil is enhanced. Larger spacing between windings tends to promote a more uniform appearance free of scallops or other markings on the surface of the annealed steel. Other methods known to promote gaseous flow around a coated side of each lap of the stainless steel material in a coil can also be used. This process contrasts with the more typically encountered tight coil anneal which does not use wire (or other) separators and therefore there is no space between individual coil laps or windings.

[0015] The annealing temperatures and atmospheres can vary depending on the use of reducing or oxidizing gases in the annealing furnace. In certain embodiments, an atmosphere of about 30% by weight hydrogen and about 70% by weight nitrogen blend of gases is used. In other embodiments 100% nitrogen, 100% hydrogen or 100% air is used. Other reactive gases such as dissociated ammonium or inert gases such as argon can be used by themselves or can be mixed into the hydrogen and/or nitrogen atmospheres. The atmospheres can be dry (with a dew point of approximately 0? F. (?17? C.) or less, or in some embodiments with a dew point of approximately ?40? F. (?40? C.) or less) or wet (with a dew point of +60? F. (15? C.) or more, or in some embodiments with a dew point +80? F. (26.7? C.) or more). Dry atmospheres tend to develop duller, darker surfaces than wet atmospheres. Anneal soak times can vary from 1 hour to 72 hours with longer times resulting in darker surfaces. Temperatures can vary from 1000? F. (537.7? C.) to 1800? F. (982? C.) depending on the capability of the annealing equipment. Annealing temperature, as well as time, can affect the resulting color of the finished surface treatment.

[0016] Stainless steel is generally defined as a steel containing about 10.5% by weight chromium or more. Any ferritic or austenitic stainless steel can be used in the present process. The grade of stainless steel of a particular embodiment (such as Types 436, 409, or 439 stainless steel, or Chromeshield? 22 stainless steel (UNS S44330), which is available commercially from AK Steel Corporation, West Chester, Ohio) influences the colors developed under the same annealing conditions. The finish on the surface of the stainless steel (for example, 2Btemper rolled Ra<20 ?in; 2Dno temper roll Ra<60 ?in; #4 Polishdirectional scratch pattern Ra<45 ?in; ESDshot blasted surface Ra 60-100 ?in; or Greystone@ finishroll textured finish Ra 100-200 ?in available from AK Steel Corporation, where Ra is the commonly used arithmetic average roughness of a surface (defined in ASME B46.1)) also affects color and gloss of the finished processed material. Less reflective incoming substrates produce typically correspondingly less reflective finishes after open coil annealing.

[0017] Therefore, the present processes alter the metallic appearance of stainless steel. Thus, by selecting the grade of stainless steel, its surface finish, and the annealing time and atmosphere, a person of skill in the art using the teachings of the present application can create a surface finish on stainless steel with the desired functional and aesthetic properties. A variety of color and textures can be obtained to provide a stainless steel-based product that is suitable for use as building panels, roofing, automotive exhaust or appliances. Due to the ability to process entire coils the costs are generally lower than existing technologies that are typically limited to processing individual sheets. In addition, the materials needed for the surface modification are more environmentally friendly than those needed to initiate complex chemical surface reactions.

[0018] Glow Discharge Spectroscopy (GDS) analysis has indicated that embodiments of the present process result in surface enrichment of chrome and nitrogen relative to the untreated alloy after OCA. There is also an associated reduction in iron at the surface thereby reducing the tendency to form red rust. The surface treatment prior to box anneal minimizes spot corrosion and improves the overall uniformity of appearance. The processed surface has a uniform gray/black appearance and the material can be bent greater than 90 degrees without surface damage. It can also survive accelerated corrosion testing that indicates suitability for exterior exposure.

Example 1

[0019] Box anneal testing was conducted using the open coil annealing facility. Various grades of stainless steel were attached to carbon steel coils and annealed using enameling grade steel-type process cycles.

[0020] One of the process cycles (the wet process) was an open coil anneal process using a 30% by weight/70% by weight hydrogen/nitrogen gas mixture at a dew point of +85? F. The material temperature was 1350? F.

[0021] The other cycle process cycle (the dry process) was an open coil anneal process using a 30% by weight/70% by weight hydrogen/nitrogen gas mixture at a dew point of ?40? F. The material temperature was 1350? F.

[0022] The following samples were tested after treating the both surfaces of the stainless steel strip with nanoparticle yttria and heated for 2 hours using the wet process described above: [0023] 2approx 48?18 inches of Chromeshield 222B finish [0024] 2approx 48?18 inches of Chromeshield 22#4 Polish finish [0025] 2approx 33?18 inches of 4352B finish [0026] 2approx 30?24 inches of 18 CrCbSB finish (shot blasted)

[0027] Corrosion tests (salt fog ASTM B117) and surface analysis were performed. The coated sample showed no pin holes or spot surface corrosion in the first 24 hours, and exhibited a uniform finish.

[0028] GDS analysis of the OCA Chromeshield 22 stainless steel material shows enrichment of the surface with chromium vs unannealed material.

Example 2

[0029] Additional production trials were completed using Chromeshield 22 and Type 436L stainless steel coils. A summary of the results is shown below in Table 1 below.

[0030] The table lists the grade of stainless (Chromeshield 22, Type 436L), the surface finish on the material (2B, 2D, #4 Polish, Eco Pickled Slurry-EPS) whether the material was treated with a suspension containing rare earth nano yttria particles on one side, the gauge, width and coil weight. The aqueous suspension containing nanoparticle yttrium oxide was applied at a level that resulted in a yttrium level of 300 to 3000 ?g/m.sup.2, or more preferably 500-1000 ?g/m.sup.2. The OCA (Open Coil Anneal) conditions are also provided. Note that all except coil No. 11 were processed using a 30% by weight/70% by weight hydrogen/nitrogen gas mixture. No. 11 was annealed using 100% nitrogen. WET indicates steam was added during anneal (+80? F. (26.6? C.) dew point). DRY indicates steam was not added (?40? F. (?40? C.) dew point). Times in the OCA varied from 2 hours to 24 hours. 2? denotes two 2-hour cycles. The material temperature was 1350? F.

[0031] The last column lists the overall appearance properties of the materials. Coils 1, 6, 10, 12-14 had the most uniform and desired surface appearance. Several coils had scallops on the treated side of the material, but more severe scallops have been seen on the non-treated side of the stainless strip. Scallops are undesirable due to appearance variations. Many of the coils were scallop free.

[0032] The color of the treated side of the stainless steel produced during these trials has been measured using an X-Rite Ci7600 spectrometer. A 1.0 inch (25 mm) area was tested using a D65-10 light source. Both Specular Included (SCI) and Specular Excluded (SCE) measurements were obtained. The data are presented in CIELAB units of L*, a* and b* where L* is a measure of the lightness and a* and b* the color components green-red and blue-yellow. Note that the use of stainless steel relative to zinc-coated or uncoated carbon steel provides better corrosion resistance due to the presence of chromium in the alloy.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Architectural Finish Trials Stainless Gauge Width Wt Inspection Coil Grade Finish Top Side (inches) (inches) (lb) OCA Notes 1 Chromeshield .sup.2B Yttria 0.024 48 11,040 Wet (2X) Dark, uniform 22 nanoparticles 2 Chromeshield .sup.2B Yttria 0.024 48 14,920 Dry (2X) Scallops on 22 nanoparticles Bottom 3 Chromeshield #4 Yttria 0.030 48 31,090 Dry (2X) Scallops on 22 nanoparticles Bottom 4 436L 2D Yttria 0.048 35 11,820 Wet (Std 2 streaky, blue nanoparticles hrs steam) streaks 5 436L 2D Yttria 0.048 35 14,540 Wet (8 hr darker but still nanoparticles steam) with blue splotchy streaks 6 436L #4 Yttria 0.048 35 10,840 Wet (Std 2 Uniform and nanoparticles hrs steam) gray - 7 436L #4 Yttria 0.048 35 14,730 Dry plus Scallops after nanoparticles Wet dry, still present after added wet 8 436L #4 Yttria 0.032 40.6 15,660 Bottom Tight wind, at nanoparticles Position, OCA. two coil Scallops, Charge, 2 better than top hrs wet coil. 9 436L #4 Yttria 0.032 40.6 10,750 Top Tight wind at nanoparticles Position, OCA. two coil Scallops, Charge, 2 worse than hrs wet bottom. 10 436L #4 Yttria 0.048 35.11 21,100 Wet (Std 2 Tight Wind at nanoparticles hrs steam) OCA. Uniform and gray. 11 436L #4 Yttria 0.032 40.64 13,300 Wet - Tight wind at nanoparticles 100% N2 OCA. Very Heavy scallops - dark purple top portion, silver bottom of coil. 12 436L #4 Yttria 0.032 40.64 10,750 Wet (Std 2 Tight Wind at nanoparticles hrs steam) OCA. Uniform and gray. 13 436L EPS Yttria 0.0458 44.15 15,230 Wet (24 Inspected. nanoparticles hrs steam) Very dull (80Ra at EPS) uniform and blue/gray. 14 436L #4 Yttria 0.0459 44.15 6,560 Wet (24 Fairly uniform nanoparticles hrs steam) and blue/gray. 15 436L #4 Yttria 0.0459 44.15 11,535 Wet (24 . Scallops nanoparticles hrs steam) compared to sister coil, 08AA

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Color measurements (SCI) for several panels produced using OCA processed stainless steel described in Table 1. Sample-Annealing Conditions L* a* b* SCI/SCE 0-436L-#4Polish-1 Cycle-Wet 60.52 0.64 8.49 SCI 1-436L-#4Polish-1Cycle-Wet- 51.65 1.82 ?0.79 SCI 17 Thin ST 2-436L-#4Polish-1 Cycle-Wet- 56.91 ?2.97 ?6.79 SCI 17 Thick ST 3-436L-2D-1 Cycle-Wet 56.15 ?1.84 8.72 SCI 4-CS22-2B-1 Cycle Wet 41.73 2.98 6.53 SCI 5-CS22-2B-2 Cycles-Wet 39.89 0.91 1.66 SCI 6-CS22-#4Polish-1 Cycle-Dry 39.87 1.23 2.69 SCI 7-CS22-4P-2 Cycle-Dry 34.62 ?0.35 ?0.46 SCI 8-QUARTZ ZINC 53.75 ?0.32 1.16 SCI 9-ANTHRA ZINC 31.56 0.22 0.63 SCI a-CMR Walnut 36.87 0.02 1.65 SCI b-VM Zinc-Pigmento Red 48.42 5.00 6.12 SCI

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Color measurements (SCE) for several panels produced using OCA processed stainless steel described in Table 1 Sample-Annealing Conditions L* a* b* SCI/SCE 0-436L-#4Polish-1 Cycle-Wet 56.12 ?0.83 4.86 SCE 1-436L-#4Polish-1Cycle-Wet-17 42.36 1.00 ?1.77 SCE Thin ST 2-436L-#4Polish-1Cycle-Wet-17 45.71 ?1.43 ?7.33 SCE Thick ST 3-436L-2D-1 Cycle-Wet 53.98 ?2.8 6.63 SCE 4-CS22-2B-1 Cycle Wet 31.39 ?1.34 ?3.68 SCE 5-CS22-2B-2 Cycles-Wet 35.87 ?1.11 ?0.41 SCE 6-CS22-#4Polish-1 Cycle-Dry 37.73 0.93 1.7 SCE 7-CS22-4P-2 Cycle-Dry 33.63 ?0.59 ?1.13 SCE 8-QUARTZ ZINC 53.52 ?0.3 1.12 SCE 9-ANTHRA ZINC 30.76 0.22 0.53 SCE a-CMR Walnut 35.03 0.04 1.41 SCE b-VM Zinc-Pigmento Red 48.24 4.99 6.03 SCE

Example 3

[0033] In addition to full coil trials, samples of various materials have been embedded within a coil to examine the effect of processing on appearance. Samples measuring 3?12 inch of several grades of stainless steel that were given various surface treatments were attached to the surface of a coil and then annealed. The results indicate that the surface appearance was affected by the grade of stainless steel and the surface treatment.

[0034] Stainless steel materials that were included were Type 409 with a 2B finish, Type 439 with a 2B finish, Type 430 with a #4 Polish finish, Type 444 with a #4 Polish finish, CHROMESHIELD 22 with a #4 Polish and CHROMESHIELD 22 with a 2B finish. The four panels in each series represent bare (no surface treatment), yttrium oxide coated, yttrium nitrate coated, and yttrium nitrate/citrate coated.

[0035] Note that the color of the surface treated samples is typically different than the bare material. In addition, the results for the yttrium oxide and yttrium nitrate treated samples are similar. Therefore, while most of the testing has been conducted using stainless steel surface treated with the yttria nanoparticle suspension, similar results are obtained by treating the samples with an aqueous solution containing less than 50% yttrium nitrate or preferably less than 5% yttrium nitrate. As in the surface treatment for the samples listed in Table 1, the amount of yttrium on the surfaces was 300 to 3000 ?g/m.sup.2 or more preferably 500-1000 ?g/m.sup.2. Similar results are expected if other rare earth oxide nanoparticles or microparticles, or nitrates of rare earth or near rare earth elements such as cerium, lanthanum or zirconium are used instead of yttrium.

Example 4

[0036] Chromeshield 22 stainless steel samples processed according to the process of Example 1 were subjected to salt fog testing (ASTM B-117). The results are set forth in Table 7 below.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 7 Material Information Time to Red rust Sample Coil ID, surface finish, anneal Top Side-Treated- ID condition, location Yttria nanoparticles Back Side-Not Treated 1 176628-01 #4 Dry Head Heavy; 24 hours Heavy, 24 hours 2 176628-01 #4 Dry Middle Light; 500 hours Heavy; 24 hours 3 176628-01 #4 Dry Tail Very light; 500 hours Heavy; 24 hours 4 130508-01AB 2B Dry Head Very light, localized; 500 Heavy, isolated to top half hours of panel; 24 hours 5 130508-01AB2B Dry Tail Heavy, isolated to center of Very light, localized; 500 panel; 24 hours hours 6 130508-01AA 2B Wet Head None; 500 hours Very light, localized; 500 hours 7 130508-01AA 2B Wet Tail None; 500 hours Very light, localized; 500 hours
Sample numbers 3, 4, 6, 7Yttria sides were placed back into chamber for additional exposure time.

[0037] Table 7 indicates that the side of the stainless steel sheet that was treated with yttria nanoparticles typically had improved corrosion resistance when compared to the opposite untreated side of the same sheet. The exceptions (Sample ID 1 and 5) were due to non-uniform application of the surface treatment on these sheets.