CASCADED RESONATOR
20180123564 ยท 2018-05-03
Inventors
Cpc classification
H03H9/25
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H03H9/25
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
In a resonator, two interdigital transducers (W1,W2) are electrically series-connected and arranged next to each other in the longitudinal direction within an acoustic track delimited by reflectors. Between the two interdigital transducers, a transition area (UEB) is formed in that the finger period p, which is defined as the distance between the finger centers of adjacent transducer fingers, is higher in comparison to the remaining interdigital transducer.
Claims
1. A resonator wherein two interdigital transducers (W1,W2) are arranged next to each other in the longitudinal direction within an acoustic track delimited by reflectors (REF)C, wherein the interdigital transducers are electrically series-connected between two connections (T1,T2), wherein a transition area (UEB) is formed between the two interdigital transducers, wherein the transition area (UEB) n comprises terminal transducer fingers (WF) which are assigned to one or both interdigital transducers, wherein the finger period p, which is defined as the distance between the finger centers of adjacent transducer fingers, is higher in the transition area in comparison to the remaining interdigital transducer, wherein n is a whole number with 1<n<16.
2. The resonator according to claim 1, wherein the transition area is formed on the two mutually facing ends of two longitudinally adjacent interdigital transducers (W1,W2), and in both interdigital transducers approximately comprises the same number of transducer fingers (WF).
3. The resonator according to claim 1 or 2, wherein more than two interdigital transducers (W) are electrically interconnected with each other between the two connections (T1,T2) and are arranged next to each other in the acoustic track.
4. The resonator according to one of claims 1-3, wherein the two connections (T1,T2) form an electric gate of the resonator (RES).
5. The resonator according to claim 3, wherein some of the more than two interdigital transducers (W) are parallel-interconnected and some are series-interconnected with each other.
6. The resonator according to one of claims 1-5, wherein the electric interconnection of two interdigital transducers (W1,W2) is created by means of a common floating bus electrode, i.e., not connected to an external potential, and/or by means of non-exciting connecting fingers (VF) that connect two floating bus electrodes of adjacent interdigital transducers transversely across the acoustic track.
7. The resonator according to claim 6, wherein a plurality of reflector strips is arranged between the two adjacent and electrically series-connected interdigital transducers (W1,W2).
8. The resonator according to one of claims 1-7, wherein the connection sequence of the transducer fingers (WF) of all the interdigital transducers (W1,W2,W3 . . . ) is laid out such that there is no phase jump in the excitation function over the entire resonator (RES).
9. A filter arrangement comprising series resonators (RS), i.e. resonators that are series-interconnected between the filter input and output, and parallel resonators (RP), i.e. resonators that are interconnected parallel thereto to a fixed potential, wherein one parallel resonator is designed according to one of claims 1 to 6.
10. The filter arrangement according to claim 9, comprising a plurality of parallel resonators (RP) that have different resonance frequencies, wherein the parallel resonator with the highest resonance frequency has the series-connected interdigital transducers (W1,W2) with the transition area (UEB).
11. The filter arrangement according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the transition area (UEB) is designed such that the mutual distance of the interdigital transducers (W) in relation to the pattern of the transducer fingers (WF) outside of the transition area (UEB) is greater and a phase shift accordingly results, wherein the phase shift is selected such that the signals of the two interdigital transducers constructively overlap.
12. The filter arrangement according to claim 11, wherein the static capacitance of the parallel resonator with the series interconnection to interdigital transducers is lower than the static capacitance of the other resonators.
Description
[0025] The invention will be explained in greater detail below with reference to exemplary embodiments and the accompanying nine figures. The figures are only schematic and not true-to-scale so that no relative or absolute dimensions can be inferred from them. Identical parts or parts that function in the same manner have the same reference numbers.
[0026] Shown are:
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039] It is also possible for the entire transition area to comprise two edge areas that have a different number of electrode fingers.
[0040] Correspondingly, a transition area can also be formed between a transducer W and a reflector REF, said transition area comprising terminal electrode fingers and/or terminal reflector fingers that have a greater finger period in the transition area.
[0041] In a resonator according to the invention, it is unnecessary for the finger period P1 in the transition area to have a constant value. It is possible to differently define individual finger periods of two adjacent fingers in the transition area, wherein however the finger period P1 in the transition area is always chosen to be larger than the finger period P0 in the other area of the respective transducer and/or reflector.
[0042]
[0043] Depending on whether one of the outer connections of the reflector comprises a ground electrode, the respective reflector can be electrically connected to this ground electrode. Transition areas according to the invention are formed in each case between two interdigital transducers that are adjacent to each other, and can additionally be formed in the transition area between the terminal interdigital transducers and the adjacent reflectors REF.
[0044]
[0045] The electrical interconnection of two adjacent interdigital transducers W can also comprise more than one connecting finger VF. Two connecting fingers VF are depicted in the figure. In the figures, the borders between adjacent transducers, between the transducers and reflectors, and between the transducers and the connecting fingers VF are indicated by dot-dashed lines in order to make it easier to assign the structures.
[0046]
[0047] The advantage of such a design is that the static capacity of the resonator can be very finely adjusted in this case. Another advantage is that an excitation profile can be configured that corresponds to the longitudinal mode. A resonator according to the invention can, however, also have similar and not necessarily symmetrically designed partial interconnections consisting of series and parallel interconnections of interdigital transducers.
[0048] The number of transducer fingers in the series-interconnected interdigital transducers does not have to be the same. The finger period between adjacent interdigital transducers or between interdigital transducers of the same acoustic track in general can also be the same or slightly different as well.
[0049] It applies to all of the exemplary embodiments of resonators according to the invention that they are better suitable for steep-edge filters by being parallel-connected to a capacitor. Such a capacitor can for example be realized by an interdigital transducer that has a finger period different from the resonator and in particular smaller. The interdigital transducer parallel-connected to the resonator and used as a capacitor can be arranged in a longitudinal extension of the resonator. It is, however, also possible to arrange it offset from the acoustic track and in particular vertically thereto so that acoustic waves generated in this transducer functioning as a capacitor experience a direction of propagation 90 askew from the resonator.
[0050]
[0051] Curves A1 to A3 represent the real part of the transducer admittance of the acoustic track of the resonator, however without reflectors. Curves K1 to K3 show the progression of the conductance plotted against the frequency for the overall resonator, i.e., the complete acoustic track including reflectors. What is most striking about the conductance curve K1 for a resonator according to the invention is that the secondary peak above the primary peak is reduced and is closer to the primary peak than that of curve K2 which corresponds to a resonator without modification in the transition area.
[0052] The array of curves for the short-circuit reflection R reveals that the upper stopband edge shifts from R3 via R2 to R1 toward lower frequencies, i.e., closer to the maximum conductance. Above the upper stopband edge, the filter becomes transparent again which is revealed in all of the curves R by a local minimum.
[0053]
[0054]
[0055] It is, however, also possible to have at least the finger period rise in one or more steps up to the maximum value in the center of the transition area. From a purely production vantage point, the steady progression of P and in the transition area is however beneficial since it proves to be advantageous for the employed metalization method or structuring method of the metalization. In other possible embodiments of the invention, finger periods measured in each case between two adjacent fingers have different values but do not form a steady progression or a plateau in the transition area.
[0056]
[0057] The resonance frequencies can be slightly offset from each other in all the resonators which results in an enlargement of the passband. The parallel resonator RP with the highest resonance frequency experiences the maximum performance in the depicted reactance filter, especially when the filter is used as a transmission filter. Preferably, this parallel resonator is therefore designed according to the invention which possesses the highest resonance frequency. As a result of the design according to the invention, this resonator is significantly more performance-resilient without having a higher static capacity.
[0058] In
[0059] A significant advantage of the invention immediately becomes evident when comparing the two transmission functions TF1, TF2. In the transmission function TF1 for the filter according to the invention, a slight ripple in the passband, which is only visible in the filter not according to the invention and which leads to a small drop in the passband, is completely compensated and smoothed.
[0060] The invention could only be described in reference to a few exemplary embodiments and is therefore not limited to these. Other possible variations result in particular from the number and size of the interdigital transducers interconnected with each other or from the number of electrode fingers in the interdigital transducers, which electrode fingers may differ for individual interdigital transducers. Another possible variation results in the form of different interconnection options, which are not restricted to the interconnection options portrayed in
[0061] Resonators according to the invention can be used in reactance filters that deviate from the reactance filter depicted in
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
[0062] RES Resonator
[0063] AS Acoustic track
[0064] REF Reflectors
[0065] W Interdigital transducer
[0066] T Connections
[0067] RES Resonator
[0068] WF Transducer finger
[0069] RB Edge area
[0070] P Finger period
[0071] n Number of transducer fingers in the transition area
[0072] RS Series resonator
[0073] RP Parallel resonator
[0074] ZS Series branch
[0075] ZP Parallel branch
[0076] VS Connection structure
[0077] A, BA, RA Admittance
[0078] R Short-circuit reflection
[0079] K Conductance
[0080] Metalization thickness eta
[0081] TF Transmission function
[0082] UEB Transition area