SENSOR ON ESCALATOR LANDING PLATE

Abstract

A sensor system for controlling operation of an escalator arranged on a landing plate at the exit of the escalator includes a plurality of sensors arranged over a landing area of the landing plate. Each sensor is disposed at predetermined intervals with respect to the width direction along the width between two balustrades and the length direction along the moving direction of the escalator, and is configured to detect a predetermined pressure so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states in response to a load presence.

Claims

1. A sensor system for controlling operation of an escalator arranged on a landing plate at the exit of the escalator, the sensor system comprising: a plurality of sensors arranged over a landing area of the landing plate, each sensor disposed at predetermined intervals with respect to the width direction along the width between two balustrades and the length direction along the moving direction of the escalator, each sensor configured to detect a predetermined pressure so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states in response to a load presence; and a control unit for scanning ON state signals of all sensors within a predetermined time period continuously, the control unit configured to detect a presence of a passenger lingered on the sensor system in response to a duration time of ON state signal of each sensor, and configured to decelerate or stop the escalator in response to a rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system with respect to the entire width of the sensor system.

2. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein each sensor is disposed at equally spaced intervals between 1 and 30 centimeters.

3. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein each sensor is configured to detect a pressure between 100 to 200 g/cm.sup.2 so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states.

4. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the sensor system is arranged in a range of at least one meter along the length direction from a comb plate.

5. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to scan ON state signals of all sensors at intervals between 100 and 200 milliseconds.

6. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to detect a presence of a passenger lingered on the sensor system if the duration time of the ON state signal of a sensor exceeds a first threshold time.

7. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the control unit is configured to decelerate the escalator if the rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system exceeds a first threshold rate.

8. The sensor system of claim 7, wherein the control unit is configured to stop the escalator if the rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system exceeds a second threshold rate greater than the first threshold rate.

9. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the occupied width of passengers includes a width of the area where the sensors detect a passenger lingered on the sensor system and a width of an additional area to extend the width of the area where sensors detect a passenger lingered on the sensor system so as to simulate human body width.

10. The sensor system of claim 6, wherein the control unit is further configured to detect a presence of an object placed on the sensor system if the duration time of the ON state signal of a sensor exceeds a second threshold time longer than the first threshold time.

11. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the control unit is further configured to detect a malfunction of the sensor if the duration time of the ON state signal of the sensor exceeds a third threshold time.

12. The sensor system of claim 1, wherein the sensor is selected from a group including a mechanical micro switch, a pressure sensor, an electrically conductive rubber for detecting resistance based on load pressure, and a metal-wire sensor formed by a plurality of wires arranged over the landing area of the landing plate.

13. The sensor system of claim 12, wherein the sensor comprises a metal-wire sensor formed by a plurality of wires arranged in a grid layout and configured to obtain ON state signal by contacting two lines intersecting with each other in response to a load presence.

14. A method of controlling operation of escalator using a sensor system arranged on a landing plate at the exit of the escalator, the sensor system comprising a plurality of sensors arranged over a landing area of the landing plate, each sensor disposed at predetermined grid intervals with respect to the width direction along the width between two balustrades and the length direction along the moving direction of the escalator, each sensor configured to detect a predetermined pressure so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states in response to a load presence, the method comprising: scanning ON state signals of all sensors within a predetermined time period continuously to monitor a duration time of each ON state signal; comparing the duration time of each ON state signal with a threshold time to detect a presence of a passenger lingered on the sensor system; determining if each row of sensors arranged along the length direction of the sensor system at the predetermined grid intervals includes any sensor having duration time exceeding the threshold time; determining a rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system with respect to the entire width of the sensor system based on the number of rows which include any sensor having duration time exceeding the threshold time; decelerating the escalator if the rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system exceeds a first threshold rate; and stopping the operation of the escalator if the rate of occupied with of passengers lingered on the sensor system exceeds a second threshold rate.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising: comparing the duration time of each ON state signal exceeding the threshold time with a second threshold time; and generating an alert to passengers on the escalator about the presence of an object on the sensor system if the duration time exceeds the second threshold time.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: comparing the duration time of each ON state signal exceeding the second threshold time with a third threshold time; determining if each row of sensors arranged along the length direction of the sensor system at the predetermined grid intervals includes any sensor having duration time exceeding the third threshold time; counting the number of sensors in each row exceeding the third threshold time; and generating a report to urge replacing whole sensor system if the number of sensors in each row exceeding the third threshold time exceeds a predetermined number.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein each sensor is disposed at grid intervals between 1 and 30 centimeters.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein each sensor is configured to detect a pressure between 100 to 200 g/cm.sup.2 so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein the sensor system is arranged in a range of at least one meter along the length direction from a comb plate.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein the control unit is configured to scan ON state signals of all sensors at intervals between 100 and 200 milliseconds.

21. The method of claim 14, wherein the threshold time is set in a range between one and two seconds.

22. The method of claim 14, wherein the first threshold rate is set to fifty percent of the entire width of the sensor system.

23. The method of claim 14, wherein the second threshold rate is set to ninety percent of the entire width of the sensor system.

24. The method of claim 14, wherein determining a rate of occupied width of passengers lingered on the sensor system is carried out based on the number of rows including rows corresponding to the area where the sensors detect a passenger lingered on the sensor system and additional rows corresponding to an additional area to extend the area where sensors detect a passenger lingered on the sensor system so as to simulate human body width.

25. The method of claim 15, wherein the second threshold time is set to ten seconds or more.

26. The method of claim 16, wherein the third threshold time is set to one day or more.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0033] FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing one possible arrangement of a sensor system according to the present invention installed in a landing plate at the exit of an escalator.

[0034] FIG. 2 is a top view of the sensor system according to the present invention installed in the landing plate at the exit of an escalator.

[0035] FIG. 3A is a flow diagram showing a method of scanning check point duration time in accordance with the present invention.

[0036] FIG. 3B illustrates a plurality of checkpoints formed by a plurality of sensors arranged on the sensor system according to the present invention.

[0037] FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of determining a status of each check point in accordance with the present invention.

[0038] FIG. 5A is a flow diagram of determining if each row of the checkpoints arranged along the length direction of the sensor system in accordance with the present invention includes any checkpoint in an abnormal condition.

[0039] FIG. 5B illustrates a series of rows of the checkpoints arranged in a coordinate grid on the sensor system in accordance with the present invention.

[0040] FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of determining occupied width of passengers lingered on the landing plate at the exit of an escalator according to the present invention.

[0041] FIG. 7A illustrates occupied width of a passenger which includes rows each having at least one checkpoint in a lingering condition and additional rows corresponding to an extended ON area which simulate human body width.

[0042] FIG. 7B illustrates occupied width of passengers lingered on the landing plate of an escalator exceeding fifty percent of the entire width of the escalator.

[0043] FIG. 7C illustrates occupied width of passengers lingered on the landing plate of an escalator exceeding ninety percent of the entire width of the escalator.

[0044] FIG. 7D illustrates that there is an object detected on the landing plate of an escalator.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0045] FIG. 1 shows a sensor system 1 in accordance with the present invention installed in a landing plate 2 at the exit of an escalator 3. As shown in FIG. 1, the sensor system 1 is arranged over a landing area of the landing plate 2 of the escalator 3, i.e. the area which passengers most likely step on when exiting the escalator 3. Generally, the sensor system 1 is arranged along the entire width between two balustrades 4 of the escalator 3 and arranged in a range of at least one meter (or at least more than the average length of stride) along the moving direction of the escalator 3 from an escalator comb plate (not shown). It should be understood that the sensor system 1 disposed on the landing plate 2 may be arranged over a width larger than the entire width between two balustrades 4. However, the entire length less than one meter along the moving direction of the escalator 3 is not preferable since it may not be able to correctly detect passengers' movement.

[0046] FIG. 2 illustrates a top view of the sensor system 1 of the present invention installed in the landing plate 2 at the exit of the escalator 3. As shown FIG. 2, a plurality of sensors 5 (or checkpoints, CPO is placed on the landing plate 2. The sensors 5 are arranged over the entire width between two balustrades 4 (hereinafter referred to as the width or X-direction), and arranged in a predetermined range, for example, at least one meter along the moving direction of the escalator 3 measured from the escalator comb plate (hereinafter referred to as the length or Y-direction). Furthermore, the sensors 5 are disposed in both X-direction and Y-direction at predetermined intervals, for example, 1 to 2 cm intervals. It should be understood that the spacing between each sensor 5 may be less than 1 cm intervals. However, the interval of more than 30 cm may not be preferable since it may not be able to correctly detect passengers' movement.

[0047] The sensor 5 constituting each check point may be any type of sensor switch including, but not limited to, any devices that can detect inputs based on load pressures consecutively such as a mechanical micro switch and a pressure sensor, an electrically conductive rubber which detects resistance based on load pressure, or a metal-wire sensor formed by a plurality of metal wires arranged in any shapes across the width direction (X-direction) and the length direction (Y-direction) of a landing plate of an escalator. Specifically, a metal-wire sensor configured to be arranged in a grid layout and configured to sense ON input by contacting two lines, one from lines in the X-direction and the other from lines in the Y-direction, in response to a passenger stepping on the lines is advantageous in that it is relatively non-breakable and inexpensive.

[0048] Each of the successive sensors 5 is configured to detect a predetermined pressure, for example, a pressure of 100 to 200 g/cm.sup.2 so as to obtain a transition of ON/OFF states in response to a load presence. In other words, each sensor 5 is triggered as ON when the load exceeds 100 to 200 g/cm.sup.2 in response to a passenger stepping on the sensor 5, and returns to OFF when the load gets lighter than the same predetermined value. Moreover, as described later with reference to FIG. 3A, all checkpoints CP.sub.ij where the sensors 5 are arranged are configured to be scanned in a predetermined cycle, for example, at 100 milliseconds (ms) intervals, so as to constantly update the change in the input state (ON states) for tracking the movement of passengers getting off the escalator at the exit. It should be understood that the detecting pressure of the ON/OFF states may be less than 100 g/cm.sup.2. However, the detecting pressure greater than 200 g/cm.sup.2 is not preferable since it may not be able to correctly detect passengers' movement.

[0049] The method of detecting a passenger lingered around the exit of an escalator 3 and controlling the escalator operation in accordance with the present invention is described with reference to FIG. 3A to FIG. 6.

[0050] FIG. 3A illustrates a flow diagram 100 of scanning check point duration time for each check point CP.sub.ij which is formed by a sensor 5. FIG. 3B illustrates a plurality of check points CP.sub.ij corresponding to a plurality of sensors 5 arranged on the landing plate 2 at the exit of the escalator 3 as described above with reference to FIG. 2.

[0051] As shown in FIG. 3B, each checkpoint CP.sub.ij is arranged on a coordinate grid 6 on the sensor system 1 disposed at the exit of landing plate 2, where the width direction corresponds to X-axis and the length direction corresponds to Y-axis, and each checkpoint CP.sub.ij can be identified by an ordered pair of numbers (i, j) in the X-Y coordinate. For example, the ordered pair (x, y) can be indicated as CP.sub.xy, where x denotes X-coordinate and y denotes Y-coordinate on the coordinate grid 6. As shown in FIG. 3B, the origin CP.sub.00 is located at the intersection of the line on the X-axis and the line on the Y-axis. Note that CP.sub.ij denotes an arbitrary checkpoint on the sensor system 1.

[0052] Again referring to FIG. 3A, operation starts from checking scanning interval time of all sensors 5 (step 101). In this embodiment, each checkpoint CP.sub.ij is scanned for a programmable amount of time, for example, 100 milliseconds for scanning a passenger lingered on the landing plate 2, i.e. a passenger stayed longer than is necessary on the landing plate 2 after getting off the escalator 3. When the scanning is carried out for a predetermined interval (100 milliseconds) (step 102), the input state for all checkpoints, CP.sub.00 to CP.sub.XY, is determined (step 103). If the sensor system 1 detects that a passenger is stepped on a sensor 5 on a checkpoint CP.sub.ij when getting off an escalator, i.e. if CP.sub.ij input is ON (step 104), then a control unit (not shown) for operating check point duration time monitoring algorithm 100 as shown in FIG. 3A increments a counter DTcpij by 0.1 seconds (step 105). If a sensor 5 on a checkpoint CP.sub.ij does not detect a passenger exiting the escalator, the control unit for operating this algorithm resets the duration time on a checkpoint CP.sub.ij as DTcpij=0 sec (step 106). When the check point status of each of all sensors 5 is derived (step 107), then the check point status is stored in a memory (not shown) and this process continues to monitor a duration time of each checkpoints CP.sub.ij for 100 milliseconds intervals in this embodiment. The duration time on each checkpoint, DTcpij derived from this algorithm is then transferred to the next algorithm as shown in FIG. 4.

[0053] FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram 200 of determining a status of each check point CP.sub.ij. In this algorithm, duration time of each check point DTcpij is compared with three types of threshold times, X.sub.linger, X.sub.laid, and X.sub.malfunction, for determining checkpoint status of each check point, CP.sub.ij.sub._status. In this specification, X.sub.linger refers to a duration time considered as a time derived from escalator speed when a passenger starts to linger around the exit of an escalator, for example, duration time of 1 second. X.sub.laid refers to a duration time considered as a time that any object is placed on any checkpoint CP.sub.ij, or a passenger possibly gets stuck on any checkpoint CP.sub.ij, for example, duration time of 10 seconds. X.sub.malfunction denotes a duration time considered as a time where any checkpoint CP.sub.ij has been consecutively detected for a predetermined time period and unavailable as a checkpoint, for example, duration time of 1 day.

[0054] At step 201, the duration time of each check point DTcpij derived from the algorithm 100 is compared with a first threshold time X.sub.linger. If the duration time DTcpij is less than X.sub.linger, then the status of the checkpoint, CP.sub.ij status, is determined to be in a normal condition, CP_NORMAL (step 204). In other words, there is no passenger lingered on the checkpoint or no object placed on the checkpoint CP.sub.ij. If the duration time DTcpij exceeds the first threshold time X.sub.linger, then the duration time DTcpij is compared with a second threshold time, X.sub.laid (step 202). If the duration time DTcpij is less than X.sub.laid, the checkpoint status CP.sub.ij.sub._status is determined to be in a lingering condition, CP_LINGERING (step 205). It follows that there is a passenger lingered or stayed longer than the first threshold time (e.g. for more than 1 second) on the checkpoint CP.sub.ij after getting off the escalator 3. If the duration time DTcpij exceeds the second threshold time then the duration time DTcpij is compared with a third threshold time, X.sub.malfunction (step 203). If the duration time DTcpij is less than the third threshold time X.sub.malfunction, the status of the checkpoint CP.sub.ij.sub._status is determined to be in a laid condition, CP_LAID (step 206). Namely, there is an object placed on the checkpoint CP.sub.ij or a passenger getting stuck on the checkpoint CP.sub.ij for more than a predetermined time period (e.g. 10 seconds). If the duration time DTcpij exceeds the third threshold time X.sub.malfunction, the checkpoint status CP.sub.ij.sub._status is determined to be in a malfunctioned condition, CP_MALFUNCTIONED (step 207). The check point status of each checkpoint, CP.sub.ij.sub._status derived from this algorithm 200 is stored in a memory (step 208) and this process returns to step 201 to continue this process. The check point status of each sensor 5 is then transferred to the next algorithm as shown in FIG. 5A.

[0055] FIG. 5A and FIG. 6 illustrate a series of flow diagrams 300 of the detection algorithm of occupied width of passengers lingered on the landing plate according to the present invention. At step 301, operation starts from checking the check point status of each row i of the checkpoints CP.sub.ij arranged on the coordinate grid 6 on the sensor system 1 as shown in FIGS. 3B and 5B. The check point status of each row i is derived from the status of each checkpoint, CP.sub.ij.sub._status, which is obtained from the algorithm 200 shown in FIG. 4. With reference to FIG. 5B, it can be seen that the row i is defined by a row 7 of checkpoints, CP.sub.i0, CP.sub.i1, . . . , CP.sub.iY, arranged along the moving direction, i.e. arranged along the entire length (Y-axis) of the sensor system 1. For example, the row 1 is the 1st row of checkpoints, CP.sub.10, CP.sub.11, CP.sub.12, . . . , CP.sub.1Y.

[0056] At step 302, the algorithm shown in FIG. 5A checks to see whether each row i of the checkpoints CP.sub.ij arranged on the coordinate grid 6 on the sensor system 1 includes any checkpoint in a lingering status CP_LINGERING or in a laid status CP_LAID. If the row i includes any checkpoint in a CP_LINGERING or CP_LAID status, the row is determined to be in a occupied condition and the control unit for carrying out this algorithm 300 sets CP.sub.row.sub._i_status=OCCUPIED (step 303), followed by the incrementing of the count i by one to check next row i+1 (step 304). At step 303, if the row i includes any checkpoint in a CP_LAID status, it follows that there is an object 8 placed on the landing plate 2 as shown in FIG. 7D or a passenger getting stuck on the landing plate 2. The control unit immediately generates an alert message to a building owner or a building administrative company to urge checking the escalator 3 and also warns passengers on the escalator 3 that there is an object detected at the exit ahead. Alternatively, the control unit may further transmit a signal to the escalator 3 to slow down the escalator 3 in addition to generating an alert to a building owner/building administrative company and passengers until the checkpoint status CP.sub.ij.sub._status=CP_LAID disappears. It should be understood that the alert message may be transmitted to a building owner or a building administrative company via any means including, but not limited to, internet, fixed lines, etc. The alert message to passengers may be any audible message using speakers or any other audible devices, any visual message using displays, indicator lamps or any other visual devices, or a combination of both.

[0057] If there is no checkpoint in a lingering status CP_LINGERING or in a laid status CP_LAID included in the row i at step 302, the control unit sets CP.sub.row.sub._i_status=NOT_OCCUPIED for the corresponding row i (step 305) and proceeds to step 306 which checks whether the row i includes any checkpoint in a malfunctioned condition, CP_MALFUNCTIONED. If there is no checkpoint in a malfunctioned condition in the row i, the algorithm proceeds to step 304 which directs the incrementing of the count value i by one and proceeds to step 308. If the row i includes any checkpoint in a malfunctioned condition, i.e. if there is any checkpoint where CP.sub.ij.sub._status=CP_MALFUNCTIONED, then the malfunctioned checkpoint CP.sub.ij is stored in a memory and the number of the malfunctioned checkpoints per row is counted (step 307), followed by the incrementing of the count i by one (step 304) and then proceeds to step 308. At step 307, if the malfunctioned checkpoint count per row exceeds a predetermined count, the control unit generates a report to a building owner or a building administrative company to replace whole sensor system 1.

[0058] Subsequently, the control unit checks to see if the count value i reaches to the end of row X in the coordinate grid 6 (I==X) (step 308). If the count value does not reach to the end of row X, then the algorithm returns to step 301 to repeat process. This loop continues until all rows are checked to see whether there is any checkpoint in a lingering status, in a laid status or in a malfunctioned status, with respect to each row i. When the count value i reaches to the end of row X, the control unit then proceeds to the algorithm in FIG. 6 which determines the occupied width of passengers lingered on the landing plate 2 at the exit of the escalator 3 and controls the operation of the escalator based on the occupied width of passengers.

[0059] Following the execution of step 308 in FIG. 5A, the control unit proceeds to step 309 in FIG. 6 which derives the percentage of rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) occupied by passengers lingered on the landing plate 2 at the exit of the escalator 3 with respect to the total number of rows X. Note that the percentage of rows occupied by passengers lingered on the landing plate 2 (hereinafter referred to as percentage of occupied rows) may include extended ON area which will be better understood with reference to FIG. 7A.

[0060] As shown in FIG. 7A, the extended ON area 10 is added to extend the area 9 where the checkpoints detect a passenger lingered on the landing plate 2. Assuming that there is a passenger lingered on the landing plate 2 at the exit of the escalator 3. The sensor system 1 will detect eight checkpoints 11 in a lingering condition as shown in FIG. 7A, each of four checkpoints corresponds to one of his footprints. By executing the algorithm shown in FIG. 5A, the four rows 12, 13, 14, 15 corresponding to the eight checkpoints 11 in a lingering condition are counted as occupied rows. However, since the human body width is larger than the width between two footprints (in this case, the total width of four occupied rows 12, 13, 14, 15), additional rows 16, 17, 18 corresponding to the extended ON area 10 are added to the four occupied rows to simulate human occupied width. Accordingly, both the rows 12, 13, 14, 15 having at least one checkpoint which is in CP_LINGERING, CP_LAID, or CP_MALFUNCTIONED condition and the additional rows 16, 17, 18 corresponding to the width of the extended ON area 10 are counted as occupied row.

[0061] In one embodiment, three to five additional rows corresponding to the extended ON area 10 are counted as occupied rows in addition to the rows corresponding to the area 9 where the input status is CP_LINGERING, CP_LAID, or CP_MALFUNCTIONED. For example, if the rows i and k include at least one CP_LINGERING, CP_LAID, or CP_MALFUNCTIONED checkpoint, then the additional rows i5, i4, i3, i2, i1 and i+1, i+2, i+3, i+4, i+5 are added to the row i as occupied rows. Likewise, the additional rows k5, k4, k3, k2, k1 and k+1, k+2, k+3, k+4, k+5 are added to the row k as occupied rows. In another embodiment, more than five additional rows corresponding to the extended ON area may be counted as occupied rows in addition to the rows which include at least one checkpoint in a CP_LINGERING, CP_LAID, or CP_MALFUNCTIONED condition. The number of the additional rows corresponding to the width of the extended ON area may be selected depending on the use situation of the sensor system 1, such as the entire width of the escalator 3, the spacing between each sensor 5, etc.

[0062] Again referring to FIG. 6, at step 309, the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd), including both rows having at least one checkpoint in a CP_LINGERING, CP_LAID, or CP_MALFUNCTIONED condition and rows corresponding to the extended ON area, with respect to the total number of rows is determined. The percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) corresponds to the occupied width of one or more passengers/objects as shown by arrow 19 in FIGS. 7A-7D. The control unit then compares the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) with a first threshold rate, X.sub.slowdown [%] (step 310). X.sub.slowdown denotes a predetermined value in percentage which triggers the escalator 3 to slow down. In one embodiment, X.sub.slowdown is set to fifty percent (50%). If the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd), i.e. the occupied width 19 of passengers lingered at the exit of the escalator 3 exceeds X.sub.slowdown as shown in FIG. 7B, then the control unit transmits a signal to slow down the escalator 3 based on the % CP.sub.ocpd value and indicate passengers the deceleration of the escalator 3 audibly and/or visually (step 311), followed by proceeding to step 312. It should be understood that multi-level speed control of the escalator 3 may be provided based on the comparison of the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) with a plurality of X.sub.slowdown values. A plurality of X.sub.slowdown values may be preset as appropriate according to the service conditions of the escalator 3. If the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) is less than X.sub.slowdown, the control unit determines that the escalator 3 is in a normal condition and returns to step 301 (FIG. 5A) to repeat process.

[0063] Following the step 311, the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) is further compared with a second threshold rate, X.sub.stop [%] (step 312). X.sub.stop is a predetermined value in percentage which triggers the escalator 3 to stop. In one embodiment, X.sub.slowdown is set to ninety percent (90%). However, it should be understood that X.sub.slowdown value may be determined as appropriate according to the service conditions of the escalator 3. At step 312, if the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd), i.e. the occupied width 19 of passengers lingered at the exit of the escalator 3 exceeds X.sub.stop as shown in FIG. 7C, the control unit immediately transmits a signal to stop the escalator 3 and indicate passengers the emergency stop audibly and/or visually, as well as generating a report to a building owner or a building administrative company (step 313). Following the execution of step 313, the algorithm 300 returns to step 301 (FIG. 5A) to repeat process.

[0064] If the percentage of occupied rows (% CP.sub.ocpd) is less than X.sub.stop, the control unit determines that the escalator 3 is in a lingering condition (where X.sub.slowdown [%]<% CP.sub.ocpd [%]<X.sub.stop [%]) and returns to step 301 (FIG. 5A) to repeat process.

[0065] According to the present invention, by employing a plurality of sensor switches arranged in a grid pattern in the width direction and the length direction over a landing area of a landing plate at the exit of an escalator as a sensor system, it is possible to detect abnormal conditions, including crowding with passengers getting off the escalator at the exit, presence of an object at the exit, and malfunction of the system, with the use of a simple and inexpensive structure compared to a conventional abnormal condition detection system for an escalator including optical sensors and the like. In particular, since the sensor system of the present invention has a structure that allows for an easy installation on the landing plate of a conventional escalator system, it can be easily retrofitted to existing escalator system.

[0066] The sensor system of the present invention is configured to detect only the residence time of a person on a landing plate in response to a ON state signal of sensors rather than detecting the number of people staying in the vicinity of the exit or moving direction of the people, and configured to control operation of the escalator based on the residence time of a person on the landing plate and the occupied width of the person with respect to the width of the escalator. Therefore, by applying the sensor system with simple control algorithm in accordance with the present invention, more simple and more accurate control can be achieved as compared with conventional escalator control systems.

[0067] Although a particular embodiment has been described with respect to installation into an escalator, it should be understood that it can also be utilized for a moving sidewalk.

[0068] While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the exemplary embodiments as illustrated in the drawings, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as disclosed in the accompanying claims.