Control arm
09944141 ยท 2018-04-17
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B33Y10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21D53/88
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21K7/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B33Y80/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60G7/001
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D25/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60G2206/8112
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21J9/027
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60G15/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B33Y10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21D53/88
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22D25/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60G7/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B21K7/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A control arm for the rear wheel suspension of a car where the control arm includes a cup-shaped spring mount with branches projecting from the spring seat. The branches may be designed as closed channels or U-shaped channels. In the upper part of the control arm there are flanges projecting from each side thereof. The flanges include a reinforced area around the spring seat. The cup-shaped spring seat is reinforces with wedges on the inside thereof. The spring seat and branches form a stiff frame structure. Also described is a method for manufacturing the control arm by forging.
Claims
1. A control arm for a wheel suspension assembly of a car, the control arm being made of aluminum or an aluminum alloy, the control arm comprising: a cup-shaped spring seat to carry a spring, the spring seat having a bottom wall and a side wall, the bottom wall defining a lower level of the control arm, the opening of the cup-shaped spring seat defining an upper level of the control arm; two integrated branches, either hollow or open, projecting directly outwardly of the side wall of the cup-shaped spring seat, on opposing sides thereof; the first flanges protruding from the control arm branches on each side at the upper level of the control arm and having an increased thickness in an area around the spring seat and with the second flanges protruding from the branches on each side at the lower level of the arm.
2. A control arm according to claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the branches are made as hollow profiles which are closed in cross section.
3. A control arm according to claim 1, wherein the branches are made as U-shaped channels with the open parts of the channels aligned with said upper level of the control arm.
4. A control arm according to claim 1, wherein the branches are made as U-shaped channels with the open parts of the channels aligned with said lower level of the control arm.
5. A control arm according to claim 1, further including reinforcing wedges on the inside of the side wall of the cup-shaped spring seat.
6. A method for producing a control arm for a wheel suspension of a car, including the steps of: forming an elongate billet from aluminum or aluminum alloy; positioning the billet in a press with a mold assembly including an upper mold, a lower mold and horizontal dies corresponding to the mold assembly; pressing the upper and lower molds into the billet forming a cup-shaped spring seat in the billet; and forcing the horizontal dies into the billet from each end thereof forming branches projecting from said spring cup.
7. A method for producing the control arm according to claim 6, wherein the control arm is cast.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(8)
(9) The object of using this particular design is to improve the integrity of the arm. In the car, the arm is exposed to vertical forces from the car body through the spring and vertical and lateral forces from the wheel. These forces will try to bend or buckle the arm, and in particular the area around the spring seat forms a weak point.
(10) The closed channels in the branches 3, 4 prevent the sidewalls from bending out i.e. the top wall will hold the sidewalls together. The flanges at the upper wall of the arm will provide a similar effect. The flanges are reinforced around the cup and there have been added reinforcing wedges on the inside of the cup. These reinforcements have been made to prevent the cup from deforming and collapsing when loaded. Loads on the arm will create forces trying to bend out the sidewall of the cup, i.e. transverse to the longitudinal axis of the arm, and fold the cup. The mentioned reinforcements will prevent this from happening under normal loads.
(11) This design of the integrated control arm will bridge the branches and cup into a stiff frame.
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16) The production process is illustrated in
(17) Then, the billet 21 is positioned in a press with molds and dies. In the illustrated embodiment, it is used a lower mold 22 and an upper mold 23. The molds 22, 23 are closed upon the billet 21 forming the cup part. The figure shows the molds separated after forming the cup, but this will normally not be the case. The molds are kept closed until the process is completed.
(18) In the next step, two opposing horizontal dies 24, 25 are pressed into the cylindrical ends of the billet forming elongated tubes. The right hand sketch in
(19)
(20) Presently, the preferred embodiment of the invention involves forging as detailed above, as this provides a very ductile and strong arm.
(21) Alternatively, the control arm may be casted in aluminum. The arms can be supported by cores that are removed after solidification of the material. A disadvantage of this solution is the low ductility obtained due to the cast grain structure of the material. The reduced ductility may mean reduced fatigue lifetime for the arm. It may be necessary to increase the dimensions and weight to obtain sufficient strength. It may also be necessary to introduce steps to improve ductility, either by heat treatment or by producing a cast semi-product that is finished by forging.
(22) 3D-printing is a rapidly developing technique. We may foresee that in the future, 3D-printing may become a feasible technique for producing this arm. However, 3D metal printing suffers from the same disadvantages as the casting method due to the cast grain structure discussed above, and if needed, the same measures may have to be taken to improve the ductility.