Branched Spike Bird Deterrent

Abstract

A bird deterrent has a base and at least one branched spike extending from the base. The branching can occur anywhere along the spike, and a single branch point can give rise to multiple branches. Spikes can have multiple branches. The various branches can be of any suitable length(s), and can be oriented in any suitable direction(s).

Claims

1. A method of manufacturing a bird deterrent, comprising: molding each of an elongated base and a plurality of spikes, wherein the spikes extend from the base, and the base includes at least one breakpoint positioned between a first segment and a second segment; molding the base and the spikes such that at least first, second, and third spikes extend from the base on the first segment, wherein the first spike extends orthogonally with respect to a bottom of the base, the second spike extends laterally outwardly, in an off-vertical manner, to a first side of the base, and the third spike extends laterally outwardly, in an off-vertical manner, to an opposite side of the base.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second segment includes at least fourth, fifth, and sixth spikes oriented substantially in the same directions as the first, second, and third spikes, respectively.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first segment additionally includes another spike that is oriented orthogonally with respect to the bottom of the base.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first segment additionally includes a fourth spike, which extends laterally outwardly, in an off-vertical manner to the first side of the base.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the fourth spike is angled differently from the base than the second spike.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the first segment additionally includes a fifth spike that extends laterally outwardly, in an off-vertical manner to the opposite side of the base

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the fifth spike is angled differently from the base than the third spike.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second spike is branched.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the first, second, and third spikes are fluted. branched.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising molding the base and the first, second, and third spikes from a common quantity of plastic.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the plastic comprises polycarbonate.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising molding the base to include a channel running longwise along the base.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the channel comprises a glue channel.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second spikes have different lengths.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the second and third spikes have different lengths.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the base and first, second and third spikes are molded together as a single piece of plastic.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

[0008] FIGS. 1 and 2 are perspective side views of a bird deterrent according to the inventive subject matter.

[0009] FIG. 3 is an arrangement of the bird deterrent shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0010] In FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, a bird deterrent 10 generally has a base 200 and a plurality of branched spikes 300. Each branched spike 300 has two top ends 320, 330, and a bottom end 340. The base 200 has a top 210, two sides 220A, 220B, and a bottom 230.

[0011] As used herein, the term branched spike refers to a spike with at least three ends; in the figures two top ends 320, 330 and a bottom end 340, and the term branch refers to the intersection of at least two portions of the branched spike. Thus, bending a normal double-ended spike does not transform it into a branched spike as the term is employed herein.

[0012] Within this broad definition, there is tremendous room for variation. For example, although a typical branched spike 300 contains a single branch point leading to two top ends, contemplated spikes (not shown) could contain branch points that lead to three or even more four top ends. It is also contemplated that a single spike can have multiple branching points, i.e., a branch could itself be further branched, such as shown in FIG. 3. It is further contemplated that several branches may occur on one branched spike 300. For example, one branch may occur at least 3 cm from the bottom end of the branched spike, measured along the spike, and another branch may occur 8 cm from the bottom end of the same branched spike.

[0013] Each branch point of a spike represents a nexus among a proximal portion (referred to herein from time to time as a trunk) that extends to or towards the base, and at least two distal portions, (referred to herein from time to time as branches), that extend to or towards the ends of the spike. Viewed in this manner, a single branch angle (as shown by numeral 380 in FIG. 1) necessarily exists at each branch point between the two branches of simple cases, and multiple branch angles exist between the multiple pairs of branches in more complex cases in which more than two branches extend from a single branch point. Except in the special case of a 90 branch angle there is a definitional choice between an acute and an obtuse angle, and to simplify the discussion the branch angle acute angle is always defined herein to mean the acute angle.

[0014] In theory any branch angle between zero and 90 is possible. Nevertheless, in practice branch angles are typically at least 10 degrees, with more preferred angles falling between 10 degrees and 90 degrees, inclusive, and still more preferred branch angles falling between 45 degrees and 75 degrees, inclusive. This is because angles of less than 10 are likely to provide only minimal benefit relative to unbranched spikes, unless one or more of the branches are substantially bent distal to the branch point. By way of clarification, all ranges discussed herein are interpreted as inclusive.

[0015] It is also theoretically possible for the branches to have any orientation with respect to the base. Thus, branches could extend vertically up or down from a trunk, horizontally, or in any other orientation. At a single branch point, for example, one branch could extend upwards and another sideways, or one branch could extend sideways in one direction and other branch could extend sideways in the opposite, collinear, direction. In general, the trunk and branches should be substantially coplanar, with the branches preferably oriented vertically. Of course, where the spikes are formed from wire or some other materials, all sorts of different orientations can be implemented.

[0016] Suitable branched spikes can be fabricated from any suitable material, including for example, metal, plastic, wood, or any mixture thereof. To some extent molded plastic (and most preferably pressure injected polycarbonate) is the most preferred material for bird deterrents having branches spikes, because the branching introduces added complexity that would substantially increase the cost of deterrents using other materials. At least portions of both the trunks and branches of molded spikes can be fluted or ribbed to provide added strength (as shown by box 370 in FIG. 1). Cylindrical spikes are preferred, and ribbed spikes are considered to have a substantially cylindrical portion as long as the portion has at least three ribs. The ribs radiate from a core at that point in a substantially evenly spaced manner, and the ribs each extend away from the core by substantially the same extent.

[0017] The term branches is used herein to refer only to those distal portions that are more than de minimus. Thus, for example, the longitudinal ridges of a ridged spike are not considered to be branches because they are likely to extend only a few millimeters from the core section of the spike. From a rigid, mathematical perspective, the term branches is used herein to refer only to those distal portions that extend at least 1 cm from the vertex of a branch point. In practice, branches are considered to begin having substantial utility as bird deterrents where they extend at least 5 cm from their respective vertices. Longer branches are considered to be more advantageous, with preferred branches extending at 10 cm from their respective vertices.

[0018] It should be appreciated that the positioning of a branch point along a spike can significantly affect the usefulness of the branches. While not being limited to any particular theory or suggested mode of action, here or anywhere else in this disclosure, it is contemplated that branches very close to the top or bottom ends of a spike are thought to offer only minimal added deterrence against birds. Preferred branch points of a spike are therefore advantageously situated at least 5 cm from where the spike connects to the base. Those skilled in the art will also realize that useful positioning of a branch point should also be determined in conjunction with the branch angle and the lengths of the corresponding branches, with the goal of effectively deterring birds from perching on or near the base.

[0019] It should also be appreciated that the spikes can form numerous different configurations with respect to base. Fanned out configurations are considered to be especially useful because they tend to provide a large area of deterrence relative to the amount of spike material being used. Even more preferred are fan configurations in which the spikes are alternatingly long and short top. By way of example, the deterrent of FIGS. 1 and 2 include a fan shaped configuration having five branched spikes 300 of one length, into which are alternatingly disposed 350 non branched spikes of another length. Branched spikes can extend from the top, any of the sides of the base, or from an edge joining the top and a side of the base.

[0020] Referring now to the base 200 of the deterrent of FIGS. 1 and 2, the bottom 230 is preferably substantially flat as shown, to facilitate affixing of the device to a roof or other foundation. The deterrent is intended to be secured using screws or nails inserted trough holes 240, and alternatively or additionally with glue that can be applied to glue channel 250. The glue channel 250 may be any size and shape so long as it contains a reservoir for glue, while still allowing the base 200 to be mounted substantially flush with the surface to which the bird deterrent is to be attached. It is also contemplated that the base 200 may be coupled to a roof or other foundation using loops, holes, fasteners, latches, or any other couplers.

[0021] Experience has shown that installation of bird deterrents having molded plastic bases is facilitated by the inclusion of intentionally weakened areas, such as break points 260. This allows a user to conveniently snap the base at a desired point to readily size the base 200 to the needs of the specific job. Break points 260 are advantageously disposed at intervals of at least 4 inches, and more preferably intervals of 6 inches of more.

[0022] The base 200 may comprise plastic, wood, metal, or any combination thereof, and need not be fabricated from the same materials as the branched or unbranched spikes. To the extent that the spikes are being molded, it is generally cost effective to confluently mold the base.

[0023] From a method perspective, a novel bird deterrents can be fabricated by providing a base and fixing a branched spike to the base. As shown in the figures, the branched spike can have two branches, and can be utilized in conjunction with non-branched spikes. The step of fixing preferably comprises injection molding the branched spike and the base as a single piece, although it is contemplated that the base and spikes could be separately molded, or one of them could be molded and the other could be fabricated using a method other than molding.

[0024] Thus, specific embodiments and applications have been disclosed of bird deterrents having branched spikes. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms comprises and comprising should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced.