Method for sterilizing biological materials

Abstract

A method for sterilizing biological materials is disclosed. A dehydrated biological material is put into a closed container. The closed container is then decompressed under a vacuum. Subsequently, 0.01 g/m.sup.3 to 1000 g/m.sup.3 of a sterilizing gas, i.e., pure ozone, is introduced into the container for a period of time until the biological material is sterilized.

Claims

1. A method for sterilizing a biological material, comprising: obtaining a dehydrated biological material; putting the dehydrated biological material into a closed container in the absence of water; decompressing the closed container under a vacuum; and introducing 0.01 g/m.sup.3 to about 1000 g/m.sup.3 of a sterilizing gas, without introducing any other gases, into the closed container in the absence of water for a period of time until the dehydrated biological material is sterilized, wherein the sterilizing gas is ozone, and the dehydrated biological material substantially remains intact after sterilization.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological material is a material produced by a living organism.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the biological material is dehydrated by lyophilization.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising a step of removing the sterilizing ozone gas from the closed container after the dehydrated biological material is sterilized.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by vacuum degassing.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by standing degassing.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological material is a material for use in a living organism.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the biological material is dehydrated by lyophilization.

9. The method of claim 7, further comprising a step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container after the dehydrated biological material is sterilized.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by vacuum degassing.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by standing degassing.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container after the dehydrated biological material is sterilized.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by vacuum degassing.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by standing degassing.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological material is a growth factor, an antibody, a hormone, a protein drug, an enzyme, collagen, a collagen derivative, gelatin, a gelatin derivative, a lipid, a fat, a ribonucleotide, a deoxyribonucleotide, a ribonucleic acids, a deoxyribonucleic acid, a saccharide, an oligosaccharide, a polysaccharide, hyaluronan, elastin, chondroitin sulfate, heparin, heparin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, glycosaminoglycan, chitin, chitosan, or alginate.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological material is a biological matrix.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the biological material is dehydrated by lyophilization.

18. The method of claim 16, further comprising a step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container after the dehydrated biological material is sterilized.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by vacuum degassing.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of removing the sterilizing gas from the closed container is carried out by standing degassing.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a micrograph at 100 times magnification showing the morphology of fibroblasts cultured on a collagen matrix sterilized by the present method.

(3) FIG. 2 is a photo of culture tubes incubated for 16 hours. Each of the culture tubes contains Staphylococci cultured in LB broth respectively mixed with, from left to right, an unsterilized collagen matrix, an ozone sterilized collagen matrix, an unsterilized collagen solution, and an ozone sterilized collagen solution.

(4) FIG. 3 is a stained electrophoresis gel of collagen subjected to the following procedures: (1) non-treatment; (2) treatment with ozone; (3) treatment with ultraviolet irradiation for 12 hours; (4) immersion in 75 vol. % ethanol for 4 hours; (5) immersion in 2 vol. % formaldehyde for 1 hour; and (6) autoclave sterilization.

(5) FIG. 4 is a photo of microcentrifuge tubes, irradiated with ultraviolet light, containing aqueous solutions (100 mg/mL or 50 mg/mL) of riboflavin: (1) 100 mg/mL, autoclaved; (2) 100 mg/mL, ozone-treated; (3) 100 mg/mL, untreated; (4) 50 mg/mL, autoclaved; (5) 50 mg/mL, ozone-treated; and (6) 50 mg/mL, untreated.

(6) FIG. 5 is a stained electrophoresis gel of pepsin and bromelain subjected to three different procedures: (1) pepsin, autoclave sterilization; (2) pepsin, treatment with ozone; (3) pepsin, non-treatment; (4) bromelain, autoclave sterilization; (5) bromelain, treatment with ozone; and (6) bromelain, non-treatment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(7) The description below providing various embodiments and specific details of the invention is illustrative only and should not be construed in any way as limiting the invention. Furthermore, various applications of the invention, and modifications thereto, which may occur to those who are skilled in the art, are also encompassed by the general concepts described below.

(8) The present invention provides a method for sterilizing biological materials. In one embodiment, the method for sterilizing biological materials is performed as follows. After dehydrating the biological material, the dehydrated biological material is put into a closed container, and 0.01 g/m.sup.3 to 1000 g/m.sup.3 or an enough dose of ozone gas is introduced into the container for a period of time until the biological material is completely sterilized. Afterwards, the ozone gas is removed from the closed container to finish sterilization of the biological material.

(9) An “enough dose” refers to a dose of ozone gas that is able to achieve complete sterilization of a biological material and can be changed according to the amount of biological material to be sterilized and the volume of the closed container. The term “biological material” refers to a material existing in a living organism, a material produced by a living organism, or a material for use in a living organism. For example, the biological material can be a growth factor, an antibody, a hormone, a protein drug, collagen, gelatin, a lipid, a fat, a ribonucleotide, a deoxyribonucleotide, a ribonucleic acid, a deoxyribonucleic acid, a saccharide, an oligosaccharide, a polysaccharide, hyaluronan, elastin, chondroitin sulfate, heparin, heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, glycosaminoglycan, chitin, chitosan, alginate, or a related derivative thereof that exists in a living organism. Moreover, the biological material can also be an enzyme, a protein product, a protein drug, a cell culture material with a biological component, an extracellular matrix, a matrix for medical use, an artificial tissue, an organ, a genetic-engineering product, a material of Chinese herb medicine, a product of Chinese herb medicine, a cosmetic product, or a cosmetic additive produced by a living organism. Furthermore, the biological material can be an antibiotic, a cell culture material with a biological component, an extracellular matrix, a matrix for medical use, an artificial tissue, or an organ for use in a living organism.

(10) The present invention is characterized by removing water from a biological material, so as to prevent the shortcomings in the prior art, such as undesired reaction between ozone and water, or insufficient ozone content in water. Even though one skilled in the art commonly knows the methods and conditions how to remove water, the present method can remove water without substantially affecting inherent bioactivity and physiochemical properties of the biological material. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the biological material is dehydrated by lyophilization. According to another embodiment of the present invention, the biological material is dehydrated under low temperature and decreased pressure.

(11) According to the present method, the dehydrated biological material is put into a closed container for sterilization with ozone. The closed container of the present invention is suitable for receiving the biological material, and it is beneficial to supply ozone gas therein or exhaust ozone gas therefrom. Preferably, the closed container has a channel for supplying and exhausting ozone.

(12) The enough dose of ozone required for sterilization depends on the quantity and property of the biological material. Typically, the ozone concentration is in the range of 0.01 g/m.sup.3 to 1000 g/m.sup.3. Preferably, the concentration is in the range of 1 g/m.sup.3 to 50 g/m.sup.3. The period of sterilization also depends on the quantity and property of the biological material. For example, 30 minutes may be needed for sterilizing collagen.

(13) According to the present method, the ozone gas is then removed from the closed container. One skilled in the art commonly knows the methods how to remove the ozone gas. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the ozone gas is removed by vacuum degassing, sterile gas exchange, or standing degassing.

(14) The present invention further provides another method for sterilizing collagen. In one embodiment, the method for sterilizing collagen is performed as follows. After dehydrating collagen, the dehydrated collagen is put into a closed container, and 0.01 g/m.sup.3 to 1000 g/m.sup.3 or an enough dose of ozone gas is introduced into the container for a period of time until the collagen is completely sterilized. Afterwards, the ozone gas is removed from the closed container.

(15) Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, based on the above description, utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The following specific examples are, therefore, to be construed as merely illustrative, and not limitative of the remainder of the disclosure in any way whatsoever. All of the publications cited herein are incorporated by reference.

Example 1: Sterilization of Collagen

(16) A collagen solution was lyophilized to obtain dehydrated collagen. Subsequently, the dehydrated collagen thus obtained was put into a closed container (21 cm×15 cm×7 cm), after which 120 mg/hour (approximately 27.2 g/m.sup.3) of pure ozone gas was introduced into the container for approximately 30 minutes. Before introducing pure ozone, the container was optionally decompressed under a vacuum. The ozone gas that remained in the collagen was then removed by standing at a ventilated laminar flow stage for about 1 hour at room temperature, or alternatively, vacuuming for 1 hour, so as to finish sterilization of the biological material. During sterilization, except pure ozone, no other gases were introduced into the container.

Example 2: Effect of Ozone Sterilization on Collagen

(17) Studies were conducted to compare collagen sterilized with ozone to that sterilized by conventional ultra-high-speed centrifugation. Unsterilized collagen was included as the control.

(18) Cell morphology on sterilized collagen: human foreskin fibroblasts were seeded on collagen matrices sterilized by the procedure described in Example 1 or conventional ultra-high-speed centrifugation. Cell morphologies were observed under a light microscope and photographed under 100 times magnification. As shown in FIG. 1, the morphology of fibroblasts grown on the collagen matrix sterilized by ozone gas are similar to that of fibroblasts grown on the collagen matrix sterilized by conventional ultra-high-speed centrifugation (not shown), in which microorganisms deposited as a sediment and were removed.

(19) Total cell numbers: human foreskin fibroblasts were seeded with a collagen solution sterilized by centrifugation, with a collagen solution sterilized by ozone gas, on a collagen matrix sterilized by centrifugation, and on a collagen matrix sterilized by ozone gas. Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 vol. % fetal bovine serum (FBS) was used to culture the fibroblasts. After a period of incubation, the collagen matrix was digested with collagenase, and the total cell numbers were counted to determine the percentages of cell numbers in comparison to the control. The results are shown in Table 1 below.

(20) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Treatment of Collagen Total Cell Number (%) Collagen solution sterilized by 100 ± 4.3 conventional centrifugation Collagen solution sterilized by ozone gas  96 ± 4.3 Collagen matrix sterilized by 100 ± 3.4 conventional centrifugation Collagen matrix sterilized by ozone gas 106 ± 8.6

(21) The results in Table 1 indicate that growth of fibroblasts cultured on the collagen matrix or with collagen solution, sterilized by ozone gas or conventional centrifugation, is very similar.

(22) Integrity of collagen molecule: molecular integrity was examined for collagen in an ozone-sterilized collagen solution and that in an ozone-sterilized dehydrated collagen matrix. After sterilization with ozone, the collagen solution became more viscous, indicating that ozone sterilization caused some polymerization when performed on collagen with high water content. By contrast, ozone sterilization caused no structural change on the dehydrated collagen matrix. Thus, it can be seen that the dehydrating step is a key step of the present method.

(23) Sterilizing ability: collagen solutions (unsterilized or ozone-sterilized) and dehydrated collagen matrices (unsterilized or ozone-sterilized) were mixed with Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-25178) in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. After culturing for 16 hours, turbidity of the cultures was monitored at 600 nm (OD600).

(24) Reference is made to FIG. 2, which shows culture tubes wherein Staphylococcus aureus was cultured in LB broth respectively mixed with, from left to right, an unsterilized collagen matrix, an ozone-sterilized collagen matrix, an unsterilized collagen solution, and an ozone sterilized collagen solution. It can be seen that the culture incubated with the unsterilized collagen matrix and that incubated with the unsterilized collagen solution were turbid due to Staphylococci growth. On the other hand, the culture incubated with the sterilized collagen matrix and that incubated with the sterilized collagen solution were clear. The OD600 data obtained for each of the four samples is shown in Table 2 below.

(25) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 OD600 Dehydrated collagen matrix Unsterilized 1.1886 Ozone-sterilized 0.0710 Collagen solution Unsterilized 2.0302 Ozone-sterilized 0.6288

(26) As shown in Table 2, the samples containing unsterilized collagen had substantially higher OD600 values, which correlated to more Staphylococci growth, as compared to the samples containing ozone-sterilized collagen. These results demonstrate that ozone treatment is effective in sterilizing both dehydrated collagen matrices and collagen solutions.

(27) Molecular Property of Sterilized Collagen: equivalent amounts of dehydrated collagen were subjected to the following respective treatments: (1) non-treatment; (2) treatment with ozone gas, as described in Example 1; (3) treatment with ultraviolet irradiation for 12 hours; (4) immersion in 75 vol. % ethanol for 4 hours; (5) immersion in 2 vol. % formaldehyde for 1 hour; or (6) autoclave sterilization under high-temperature and high-pressure. Afterwards, each of the samples from the aforementioned treatments was dissolved in acetate solution, analyzed by 5% acrylamide gel electrophoresis, and stained with Coomassie blue. The results are shown in FIG. 3.

(28) Reference is made to FIG. 3. The dehydrated collagen treated by ozone gas [lane (2)] shows bands of the major α1, α2 and β chains that are substantially the same as the control [lane (1)], indicating that the molecular weights and ratios of these components were unchanged; the collagen treated by ultraviolet irradiation [lane (3)] was partially polymerized and cleaved, as evidenced by decrease in stain density of the α1, α2 and β bands; the collagen treated by immersion in ethanol [lane (4)] only showed indistinct bands in the electrophoresis gel as its components were polymerized and therefore less soluble; the collagen treated by immersion in formaldehyde [lane (5)] showed no bands in the electrophoresis gel as its components were highly polymerized and insoluble, resulting in their inability to enter the gel; the collagen treated by autoclave sterilization under conventional high-temperature and high-pressure [lane (6)] was mostly degraded and therefore showed major bands with decreased stain density. It is clear that the ozone sterilization method is better than other methods for treating collagen.

Example 3: Effect of Ozone Sterilization on Riboflavin

(29) Dehydrated riboflavin was untreated, sterilized by autoclave, or sterilized with ozone. Samples were then dissolved in water to prepare six riboflavin solutions, i.e., solution 1 (100 mg/mL, autoclaved), solution 2 (100 mg/mL, ozone-sterilized), solution 3 (100 mg/mL, untreated), solution 4 (50 mg/mL, autoclaved), solution 5 (50 mg/mL, ozone-sterilized), and solution 6 (50 mg/mL, untreated). Fluorescence intensities of the six solutions were observed under ultraviolet irradiation.

(30) As shown in FIG. 4, fluorescence intensities of the autoclaved riboflavin solutions, i.e., solutions 1 and 4, were higher than those of the untreated control solutions, i.e., solutions 3 and 6. The higher fluorescence intensities of solutions 1 and 4 were attributed to higher degrees of degradation of the autoclave riboflavin. By contrast, fluorescence intensities of solutions containing ozone-sterilized riboflavin, i.e., solutions 2 and 5, were similar to those of the untreated riboflavin solutions, which indicated that riboflavin remained intact after being sterilized with ozone. In view of these results, it is clear that ozone is superior to autoclave for sterilizing riboflavin.

Example 4: Effect of Ozone Sterilization on Pepsin and Bromelain

(31) Samples of two dehydrated enzymes, i.e., pepsin and bromelain, were untreated, sterilized by autoclave, or sterilized with ozone. Subsequently, the samples were dissolved acetate solutions, analyzed by 5% acrylamide gel electrophoresis, and stained with Coomassie blue.

(32) Reference is made to FIG. 5. As seen in this figure, ozone-treated pepsin [lane (2)] showed a single band that was the same as that shown by untreated pepsin [lane (3)], indicating that ozone did not degrade this enzyme. On the other hand, autoclaved pepsin [lane (1)] showed a band with substantially reduced stain density, indicating degradation of the enzyme. Ozone-treated bromelain [lane (5)] showed the same band as the control [lane (6)], indicating that this enzyme also was not degraded by ozone. By contrast, autoclaved bromelain [lane (4)] only showed an indistinct band, signifying a high degree of degradation. It is clear that ozone-sterilization, unlike autoclave-sterilization, does not affect molecular integrity of both pepsin and bromelain.

Example 5: Effect of Ozone Sterilization on Hyaluronan

(33) Two equivalent amounts of hyaluronan (average molecular weight: 58 kDa), were respectively subjected to ozone sterilization and autoclave sterilization. Subsequently, the sterilized samples were analyzed by capillary electrochromatography using a fused silica capillary and a 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.99). Separations were carried out at 25 kV and a column temperature of 25° C. Absorbance was detected at 194 nm. Shown in Table 3 below are the areas under the peak for each of the two samples, which correspond to the amount of hyaluronan contained therein. An untreated sample was included as the control.

(34) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Sample Migration Time (min.) Area under the Peak Autoclaved 12.179 633930 Ozone-treated 12.179 814725 Untreated control 12.358 874193

(35) As shown in Table 3, the area under the peak for the ozone-treated sample (814725) was similar to that of the untreated control (874193). On the other hand, the peak area of the autoclaved sample was reduced (633930). These results demonstrate that ozone-sterilization causes less material loss as compared to autoclave-sterilization.

OTHER EMBODIMENTS

(36) As is understood by a person skilled in the art, the foregoing descriptions of the embodiments of the present invention are an illustration of the present invention rather than a limitation thereof. Various modifications and similar arrangements are included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the claims should be accorded to the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures. While an embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.