Trap fill time dynamic range enhancment
11488815 · 2022-11-01
Assignee
Inventors
- Martin Raymond Green (Bowdon, GB)
- Jason Lee WILDGOOSE (Stockport, GB)
- Steven Derek Pringle (Darwen, GB)
- Kevin R. Howes (Altrincham, GB)
Cpc classification
H01J49/0036
ELECTRICITY
H01J49/025
ELECTRICITY
H01J49/0031
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A method of mass and/or ion mobility spectrometry is disclosed that comprises accumulating ions for a first period of time (T1) one or more times so as to form one or more first groups of ions, accumulating ions for a second period of time (T2) one or more times so as to form one or more second groups of ions, wherein the second period of time (T2) is less that the first period of time (T1), analysing the one or more first groups of ions to generate one or more first data sets, analysing the one or more second groups of ions to generate one or more second data sets, and determining whether the one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data. If it is determined that the one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data, then the method further comprises replacing the saturated and/or distorted data from the one or more first data sets with corresponding data from the one or more second data sets.
Claims
1. A method of mass and/or ion mobility spectrometry comprising: forming one or more first groups of ions by operating one or more first devices in a high transmission mode of operation and accumulating ions within an ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region; forming one or more second groups of ions by operating said one or more first devices in a low transmission mode of operation and accumulating ions within the ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region, wherein forming said one or more first groups of ions and forming said one or more second groups of ions comprises accumulating ions for the same period of time; analysing said one or more first groups of ions to generate one or more first data sets; analysing said one or more second groups of ions to generate one or more second data sets, wherein each of said one or more second groups of ions comprises fewer ions than each of said one or more first groups of ions, and wherein analysing said one or more first groups of ions and said one or more second groups of ions comprises analysing ions downstream of said ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region; determining whether said one or more first data sets comprises saturated and/or distorted data by comparing data from said one or more first data sets with data from said one or more second data sets; wherein when it is determined that said one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data, then said method further comprises: replacing said saturated and/or distorted data from said one or more first data sets with corresponding data from said one or more second data sets.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising passing said ions through said one or more first devices.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said one or more first devices are selected from the group consisting of: (i) one or more ion gating devices; (ii) one or more electrodes; and (iii) one or more ion lenses.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of determining whether said one or more first data sets comprises saturated and/or distorted data by comparing said data from said one or more first data sets with said data from said one or more second data sets comprises determining whether said data from said one or more first data sets differs from said data from said one or more second data sets in a manner other than by an expected intensity scaling factor.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4, wherein said expected intensity scaling factor approximately corresponds to the ratio between the number of ions in one or more of said one or more first groups of ions to the number of ions in one or more of said one or more second groups of ions.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of determining whether said one or more first data sets comprises saturated and/or distorted data by comparing said data from said one or more first data sets with said data from said one or more second data sets comprises determining whether said data from said one or more first data sets differs from said data from said one or more second data sets in terms of: (i) one or more mass or mass to charge ratios; (ii) one or more ion mobilities, ion mobility drift times, collision cross sections and/or interaction cross sections; and/or (iii) an intensity ratio or difference between two or more isotope peaks or other ion peaks within a data set.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising separating said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions according to one or more first physico-chemical properties before said step of analysing said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions.
8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said one or more first physico-chemical properties comprise ion mobility, collision cross section and/or interaction cross section.
9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of analysing said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions comprises determining the mass to charge ratio of said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions.
10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said step of analysing said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions comprises determining the ion mobility, collision cross section, and/or interaction cross section of said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions.
11. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said one or more first groups of ions is accumulated over a time period that has the same duration as a time period over which said one or more first groups of ions is separated; and/or wherein said one or more second groups of ions is accumulated over a time period that has the same duration as a time period over which said one or more second groups of ions is separated.
12. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said method comprises analysing said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions using a Time of Flight mass analyser.
13. A mass and/or ion mobility spectrometer comprising: one or more first devices; an ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region, wherein said spectrometer is configured to form one or more first groups of ions by operating one or more of said one or more first devices in a high transmission mode of operation and accumulating ions within the ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region, wherein said spectrometer is configured to form one or more second groups of ions by operating one or more of said one or more first devices in a low transmission mode of operation and accumulating ions within the ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region, and wherein said spectrometer is configured to form said one or more first groups of ions and said one or more second groups of ions by accumulating ions for the same period of time; an analyser configured to analyse said one or more first groups of ions to generate one or more first data sets and to analyse said one or more second groups of ions to generate one or more second data sets, wherein each of said one or more second groups of ions comprises fewer ions than each of said one or more first groups of ions, and wherein said analyser is located downstream of said ion trap, trapping region or accumulation region; and a control system configured to determine whether said one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data by comparing said one or more first data sets with said one or more second data sets; wherein said control system is further configured to, when it is determined that said one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data: replace said saturated and/or distorted data from said one or more first data sets with corresponding data from said one or more second data sets.
14. A spectrometer as claimed in claim 13, wherein said one or more first devices are selected from the group consisting of: (i) one or more ion gating devices; (ii) one or more electrodes; and (iii) one or more ion lenses.
15. A spectrometer as claimed in claim 13, further comprising a separation device configured to separate said one or more first groups of ions and/or said one or more second groups of ions according to one or more first physico-chemical properties.
16. A spectrometer as claimed in claim 15, wherein said one or more first physico-chemical properties comprise ion mobility, collision cross section and/or interaction cross section.
17. A spectrometer as claimed in claim 13, wherein said analyser is configured to determine an ion mobility, collision cross section, and/or interaction cross section of said ions.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Various embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) According to various embodiments a substantially continuous beam of ions is generated. The beam of ions may be generated, for example, by ionising a sample (e.g. using an ion source) and/or by ionising a sample to generate parent or precursor ions and then fragmenting or reacting the parent or precursor ions (e.g. using a fragmentation, collision or reaction device) to generate the ions, etc.
(11) A first group of ions is effectively formed by accumulating ions from the ion beam for a first continuous period of time T1. A second group of ions may then be effectively formed by accumulating ions from the ion beam for a second continuous period of time T2. The ions may be accumulated in an ion trap or in an ion accumulation region, such as a mass selective ion trap or a non-mass selective ion trap, or an accumulation region of an ion mobility separation device.
(12) The second continuous period of time T2 may be substantially less that the first continuous period of time T1 (i.e. the first time T1 is substantially longer than the second time T2) such that the second group of ions comprises fewer ions than the first group of ions.
(13) According to various embodiments, a plurality of first groups of ions is effectively formed in this way, by repeatedly accumulating ions for the first period of time T1, and a plurality of second groups of ions is effectively formed in this way by repeatedly accumulating ions for the second period of time T2. The method may alternate between forming a single first group of ions and a single second group of ions, etc. Additionally or alternatively, one or more first groups of ions may be formed, followed by one or more second groups of ions, followed by one or more first groups of ions, and so on.
(14) According to various embodiments, each of the one or more first groups of ions is analysed so as to generate one or more “high intensity” (first) data sets, and each of the one or more second groups of ions is analysed so as to generate one or more “low intensity” (second) data sets. This may involve determining the mass to charge ratio of the ions (e.g. using a Time of Flight mass analyser), and/or determining the ion mobility, collision cross section and/or interaction cross section of the ions (e.g. using an ion mobility separator).
(15) According to various embodiments, the rate at which alternate high and low intensity spectra are recorded is such that the composition of the sampled ion beam will be substantially the same for consecutive high and low intensity spectra. This ensures that the data sets are comparable. For example, in various embodiments, the ions are generated by ionising analyte from a chromatography system (e.g. ionising eluent from a liquid chromatography device), and the rate at which alternate high and low intensity spectra are recorded is set such that individual chromatography peaks will typically be sampled one or more times in each of the high and low intensity modes of operation.
(16) According to various embodiments, it is then determined whether or not the one or more high intensity data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data. Saturated data may arise where, for example, a data set comprises data having a value greater than or equal to the saturation level of the detector. Distorted data may arise, for example, due to space charge effects, e.g. when a large number of ions are trapped together in a small region (e.g. in the ion trap or accumulation region, or another, e.g. downstream, device), or otherwise.
(17) In various embodiments, if it is determined that the one or more high intensity data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data, then the saturated and/or distorted data from the one or more high intensity data sets is replaced with corresponding data from the one or more low intensity data sets. One or more individual data values may be replaced (for example, where a limited number of ion peak(s) in the data set meet or exceed the saturation level or are affected by space charge effects), or one or more entire data sets may be replaced (e.g. where space charge effects cause the entire data set(s) to be distorted), as appropriate. In various embodiments, the corresponding data from the low intensity data set is appropriately scaled before it is added to the high intensity data set.
(18) As will be appreciated, the resulting composite spectrum will have an enhanced dynamic range.
(19) In various embodiments, one or more or all of the groups of ions are separated according to one or more physico-chemical properties such as ion mobility and/or mass to charge ratio before they are analysed. This may involve ejecting the accumulated ions from the ion trap or accumulation region (e.g. where the trap or accumulation region comprises a mass selective or analytical ion trap, wherein ions are ejected from the ion trap in order or reverse order of their mass to charge ratio) and/or passing the ions to a separation device, and then separating the ions in the separation device (e.g. where the separation device comprises an ion mobility separator). In various embodiments, this process is performed repeatedly for each group of ions as it is formed.
(20) In various embodiments, the separation device is operated to separate ions in a cyclical manner. Each cycle of the separation device may involve the separation device receiving a group of ions (i.e. ions being injected into the separation device) over a certain (fourth) period of time T.sub.inj, and then the separation device separating the received ions over a separation (third) time T.sub.ims that in various embodiments substantially immediately follows the fourth period of time. Once the separation device has separated a given group of ions (in the third period of time), the next cycle of separation may then begin. Thus, the separation device receives a further group of ions in a further fourth period of time T.sub.inj which may substantially immediately follow the separation (third) time T.sub.ims, and so on. Accordingly, the separation device may be operable to perform multiple repeating cycles of separation, where each cycle of separation is performed during a fixed, repeating time period (cycle time) (T.sub.inj+T.sub.ims).
(21) The ions may also be filtered according to, e.g. mass to charge ratio or otherwise, before they are analysed. A quadrupole mass filter or other filtering device may be provided for this purpose.
(22) In various embodiments, the processes of accumulating and analysing ions are performed repeatedly in synchronism with the cycle time of the separation device. In various embodiments, for each cycle of separation of the separation device, a first or second group of ions is accumulated during (at the same time as) the (third) period T.sub.ims and the group of ions may then be ejected from the ion trap or accumulation region into the separation device during the fourth period of time T.sub.inj. Accumulating a set of ions at the same time as separating the previously accumulated set of ions has the effect of increasing duty cycle.
(23) Thus, in various embodiments, the mass and/or ion mobility spectrometer is repeatedly switched between a first mode of operation in which the time in which a population of ions is allowed to enter an ion trapping region, optionally prior to a first ion mobility separation or set of ion mobility separations, is a first fixed time T1, and a second mode of operation in which the time in which ions are allowed to enter the trapping region, optionally prior to a second ion mobility separation or set of ion mobility separations, is a second (shorter) fixed time T2.
(24) First ion mobility and/or mass spectral data may be obtained during the first mode of operation, and second ion mobility and/or mass spectral data may be obtained during the second mode of operation.
(25) That is, ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) data may be recorded for one or more populations of ions which have been accumulated in an upstream RF confined trapping region for a first accumulation time T1, and one or more subsequent ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) data sets may be recorded for one or more populations of ions which have been accumulated for a second fixed time T2, where in various embodiments T1>T2. The trap accumulation time, optionally prior to ion mobility separation, may be alternated between two or more predetermined values to produce a high and low transmission or intensity, two dimensional, ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) data set.
(26) The accumulation time T1 may correspond to substantially the whole of the IMS separation time T.sub.ims, i.e. in various embodiments T1=T.sub.ims. This increases or maximises the number of ions that may be accumulated in the accumulation time T1. In the low transmission or intensity (second) mode of operation the accumulation time T2 may be set to be less than the time period during which the ions are traversing the ion mobility (“IMS”) drift region T.sub.ims, thereby reducing the intensity of ions delivered to the ion detector.
(27) Accordingly, a pre-determined sequence of ion population control operations may be repeatedly performed so as to provide alternating high and low intensity data sets. Since each data set is collected over a deterministic time period, the data sets can then be “stitched together” or combined in post-processing in a relatively straightforward manner. This is particularly beneficial, e.g., where the ions are generated by ionising analyte from a chromatography device, e.g. such that each chromatography peak may be sampled one or more times in each of the high and low intensity data modes.
(28) At least some of the second ion mobility and/or mass spectral data may be used instead of at least some of the first ion mobility and/or mass spectral data if it is determined that at least some of the first data has been affected by saturation or distortion. Portions of data which exceed the dynamic range of the detection system in the higher transmission data set may be replaced by corresponding data from the low transmission data set scaled by a suitable factor.
(29)
(30) The mass and/or ion mobility spectrometer may comprise an ion source 1, an ion accumulation region or ion trap 2 arranged downstream of the ion source 1, an ion mobility separation device 3 arranged downstream of the ion accumulation region 2, an optional quadrupole mass filter 4 arranged downstream of the ion mobility separation device 3 and a mass analyser 5 (such as an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser) arranged downstream of the quadrupole mass filter 4.
(31) According to various embodiments, in operation, ions may be produced in the ion source 1 and then accumulated in the accumulation region 2 before optionally being pulsed into the ion mobility separation device 3. As ions travel within the ion mobility separation device 3 a subsequent population of ions may be accumulated in the ion accumulation region 2.
(32) Ions exiting the ion mobility separation device 3 may enter the quadrupole mass filter 4 which may be set to transmit substantially all the ions exiting ion mobility device 3 (i.e. in a so-called “RF only” mode). Alternatively, the mass filter 4 may be set to transmit ions over a narrow mass to charge ratio range (e.g. on application of an appropriate resolving DC voltage).
(33) According to various embodiments, the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) range transmitted by the quadrupole mass filter 4 may be altered in synchronization with the elution of specific ions from the ion mobility separation device 3. Ions which exit the quadrupole mass filter 4 are mass analysed by the mass analyser 5.
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39) The transmission or duty cycle (DC1) for this first, high intensity, mode of operation is given by:
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45) The transmission or duty cycle (DC2) for this second, low intensity, mode of operation is given by:
(46)
(47) In various embodiments, the ratio of DC2 to DC1 may be set to between around 1% and 10%. This provides a particularly useful dynamic range enhancement. However, any other suitable ratio may be used as desired.
(48) In the embodiments illustrated in
(49) In various embodiments, the accumulation time or mode of operation may be switched or altered between ion mobility separation cycles. Accordingly, the duty cycle of the system may be alternated between the above fixed and predetermined values between single ion mobility (“IMS”) separations or between sets of multiple ion mobility separations.
(50) In one embodiment, the mode of operation may be switched between every ion mobility separation cycle. This results in a data set where the system is operating in the high transmission mode for around 50% of the total experimental time.
(51) In various other embodiments several ion mobility separations may be performed under the same transmission mode and the results may be averaged or summed into a single ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) data set or spectrum. For example, for a 100 ms total spectral time and a T.sub.ims=10 ms, ten ion mobility separations may be performed and summed under each of the transmission conditions to give two dimensional single ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) spectra alternating between high and low transmission at a rate of 10 spectra per second.
(52) In these embodiments, the time allocated to acquiring data in the high transmission mode of operation and the low transmission mode of operation may be altered to optimize the overall duty cycle of the system. For example, 15 ion mobility cycles in the high transmission mode of operation may be summed followed by 5 ion mobility cycles in the low transmission mode of operation. As the time during which the system acquires data in the high transmission mode of operation is greater than the time during which the system acquires data in the low transmission mode of operation, the overall duty cycle is increased e.g. from approximately 50% to approximately 75%. Any suitable number of high transmission and low transmission cycles may be performed as desired.
(53) Thus, in various embodiments in a given time period, n first groups of ions are effectively formed, and m groups of second ions are effectively formed, where n is greater than m. In other words, on average relatively more of the high transmission (first) groups of ions may be formed than the low transmission (second) groups of ions. In other embodiments, n may be equal to or less than m.
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57) The resultant combined spectrum has a dynamic range of approximately ten times that of the spectra shown in
(58)
(59)
(60) According to various other embodiments, the approach of the embodiments described above may be used to improve the dynamic range when coupling a mass selective ion trap to an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight system e.g. to facilitate high duty cycle comprehensive MS-MS operation.
(61) In these embodiments, a separate upstream accumulation region may be provided prior to the mass selective trap, with the ion accumulation time optionally alternating between two or more values, e.g. as described above. Alternatively, if no upstream accumulation region is provided, the time over which ions are accumulated directly into the analytical ion trap may be alternated between one or more different times, e.g. as described above. Again, the fill times may be predetermined prior to the start of the acquisition.
(62) In these embodiments, low intensity and high intensity two dimensional mass to charge ratio versus mass to charge ratio data sets may be produced. A composite data set may be produced with higher dynamic range using the methods of the embodiments described herein.
(63) According to various other embodiments, the same approach may be taken for arrangements wherein ions are trapped and then released to a mass analyser (e.g. to an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight (“ToF”) mass spectrometer, optionally without passing through a separation device). For example, in enhanced duty cycle mode (“EDC”) or target enhancement mode ions may be firstly trapped, and the release of the ions may be synchronized with the orthogonal sampling pulse of the mass analyser to give high duty cycle over a limited mass to chare ratio (“m/z”) range.
(64) Alternating the trap fill time on a push to push or spectrum to spectrum basis and combining the two sets of data in accordance with various embodiments allows higher dynamic range to be realized.
(65) Thus, according to various embodiments, a mass selective ion trap may be provided upstream of a time of flight mass analyser. According to various embodiments, a non-mass selective ion trap may be provided upstream of a mass selective ion trap which may be provided upstream of a time of flight mass analyser.
(66) According to various embodiments, a non-mass selective ion trap may be provided upstream of a mass selective ion trap which may be provided upstream of a scanning quadrupole which may be provided upstream of a time of flight mass analyser. The scanning quadrupole may be operated in synchronism with the time of flight mass analyser for high sensitivity and high duty-cycle comprehensive MS-MS.
(67) In various other embodiments, the techniques described herein may be applied to apparatus in which ions are trapped and released in reverse mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) order and converge simultaneously at an orthogonal acceleration sampling electrode, thereby resulting in high duty cycle for the entire mass to charge ratio range (e.g. as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,794,640 (Micromass)). Alternating the trap fill time and subsequently combining the time of flight data can improve the overall dynamic range of the data produced.
(68) According to various embodiments, ions may be accumulated in an accumulation region or ion trap, and then may be mass selectively ejected from the accumulation region or ion trap, and then filtered by a quadrupole mass filter. Alternatively, ions may be accumulated in an accumulation region or ion trap, and then may be mass selectively ejected from another downstream analytical ion trap, and then filtered by a quadrupole mass filter. In these embodiments, the mass to charge ratio transmission window of the quadrupole mass filter may be altered (scanned) substantially in synchronism with the mass to charge ratio of the ions as they are mass selectively ejected from the ion trap.
(69) According to various embodiments where the high intensity data set is not determined to be distorted or saturated, the high intensity data set may be used or retained, or alternatively the low intensity data set may be combined with the high intensity data set, and the combined data set may be used.
(70) According to various further embodiments more than two different fill times may be used in a corresponding manner to that described above. Thus, in various embodiments one or more third and/or further groups of ions may be formed by, for each of the one or more third and/or further groups of ions, accumulating ions for a third and/or further different period of time. The one or more third and/or further groups of ions may be analysed to generate one or more third and/or further data sets, which may be used in the manner of the embodiments described above. In these embodiments, the highest intensity or duty cycle data set that is not determined to be distorted or saturated may be retained or used.
(71) According to various embodiments, it may be determined whether or not a or the (e.g. first) data set comprises distorted data resulting from space charge effects. According to various embodiments this may be done based on the total ion current (“TIC”). In various embodiments, if the total ion current (“TIC”) recorded in the high intensity data set is such that it is at a level at which it is known that the mass and/or ion mobility spectrometer (e.g. ion mobility (“IMS”)) performance may be distorted due e.g. to space charge effects (e.g. such that it is above a threshold value), then it may be determined that the data set comprises distorted data, and the entire high intensity data set (e.g. ion mobility-mass to charge ratio (“IMS-m/z”) data set) may then be replaced by data from the corresponding low intensity data set.
(72) In these embodiments the accumulation time switching method is effectively used to produce a data set which is less distorted due to space charge effects, e.g. in the ion mobility separation device 3 and/or accumulation region 2, rather than less distorted due to detection system saturation effects.
(73) The Applicants have furthermore recognised that other techniques for determining when space charge effects have occurred may be useful and desirable.
(74) In some instrument geometries, the recorded signals or spectra (e.g. the TIC) may not give a suitable indication of the amount of charge accumulated e.g. in the ion trap or accumulation region. This may be primarily due to the imperfect transmission of a particular device or combination of devices between the ion trap or accumulation region and the acquisition (detector) system. In many cases, this transmission factor may be unknown or known only to a limited precision. This can lead to miscalculations of the accumulated charge in the ion trap or accumulation region where the calculation is based on the measured signal or spectra (e.g. TIC).
(75) The transmission may also vary as a function of mass, mass to charge ratio, ion mobility or charge state, etc. For example, the transmission may vary as a result of the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) transmission profile of a Time of Flight (“ToF”) mass spectrometer such as an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight (“OA-ToF) mass analyser, as a result of one or more RF devices and/or as a result of the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) and/or charge transmission profiles of one or more electrostatic lenses. Furthermore, in addition to these transmission effects, the detection efficiency can also be mass, mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) and/or charge state dependent, leading to similar effects.
(76) These effects can make accurate calculation of the charge accumulated in the ion trap or accumulation region complicated, inaccurate or imprecise. This could then result in data being used that is distorted due to space charge effects.
(77) Furthermore, in contrast with the above described embodiments in which it is determined whether detector saturation is present, it may not be possible to directly determine from an individual (e.g. high intensity) data set whether space charge effects are present. This is because space charge effects can change different mass spectral peaks in different ways (e.g. all the singly charged ions might be suppressed, but not the doubly charged ions, etc.) and can be relatively subtle.
(78) Furthermore, according to various embodiments using the geometry shown in
(79) Thus, according to various embodiments, it may be determined whether or not a high intensity (first) data set comprises distorted data resulting from space charge effects based on a comparison of the high intensity (first) data set and the corresponding low intensity (second) data set. Qualitative and/or quantitative differences between the high intensity data set and the low intensity data set may be determined and used to do this.
(80) The Applicants have recognised that, absent space charge effects, the high intensity data set and the corresponding low intensity data set should be relatively similar where the only difference is a scaling factor that relates to e.g. the difference in the fill time between the two data sets (or more generally to the difference between the number of ions acquired for each data set).
(81) Thus, if the high intensity data set and the corresponding low intensity data set are significantly different in some other way, then it may be determined that space charge effects are present. In particular, differences in the data sets in terms of some peaks being suppressed relative to others, mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) changes, etc. may be indicative of the presence of space charge effects.
(82) Additionally or alternatively, in various embodiments the expected scaling factor between the data sets and the corresponding experimentally determined scaling factor may be compared to determine the presence of space charge effects. If, for example, a 10x scaling factor is expected based on the fill time or otherwise, but a factor of more or less than this is measured, this may indicate the presence of space charge effects.
(83) According to various embodiments, individual distorted peaks and/or the entire distorted spectra may be replaced when space charge effects are determined to be present.
(84) Thus, according to various embodiments, the above described transmission effects may effectively be cancelled out by switching the fill time or duty cycle of ions entering an ion trap or accumulation region between two or more known values, e.g. as described above. As the duty cycle values are known, the effect on the final data set is predictable in the absence of space charge effects e.g. each component in the spectra should be simply scaled by the relative transmission factors.
(85) On the other hand, in situations where space charge effects are present, the two or more spectra will exhibit differences. This is illustrated by
(86)
(87) Thus, in an approach according to various embodiments, the two spectra or data sets (i.e. the high intensity data set and the low intensity data set) may be compared taking in to account the known duty cycle factor (e.g. as described above). If the data sets are determined to differ significantly (i.e. in a way which does not simply relate to the differences in intensities), then data associated with the lower duty cycle (the low intensity data set) may be retained (i.e. in place of the distorted high intensity data set) in the manner as described above.
(88) According to various embodiments, the comparison step may be achieved by simply comparing the total ion current (“TIC”) values or by comparing TIC values in one or more regions of the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) range, or by more computationally intensive point to point comparisons. The comparison may also take place after mass spectral and/or ion mobility spectral peak detection, where detected peaks may be compared individually or in bulk.
(89) In embodiments that use the geometry shown in
(90) According to various embodiments, the comparison may involve determining the presence of local or bulk drift time shifts for the same species between the high and low intensity or transmission data sets. Space charge effects in the ion mobility separation device may cause such local or bulk drift time shifts for the same species between the high and low transmission data sets. This distortion may be used to recognise corruption of a (e.g. IMS-MS) data set or spectrum and may be used to determine that data from the corresponding low transmission cycle should be utilised in its place, e.g. as described above.
(91) The approach of these embodiments may also be used to control and account for other effects related to total charge in a or the ion trap or accumulation region such as ion-ion or ion-neutral reactions.
(92) In embodiments where the fill time is switched between more than two values, the retained data may be taken from the highest duty cycle data set that is determined not to differ from the next lowest duty cycle data set.
(93) In embodiments where the data sets associated with two or more duty cycle values are deemed to be the same, the data sets may be combined.
(94) The Applicants have furthermore recognised that these embodiments for determining the presence of space charge effects by comparing corresponding high and low intensity data sets may be applied to other dynamic range enhancement (“DRE”) techniques where high and low intensity data sets are produced, i.e. not necessarily using differing trap fill times.
(95) For example, according to various embodiments, the transmission of a device may be switched between high transmission and low transmission modes of operation to produce corresponding high intensity and low intensity data sets.
(96) According to various embodiments the transmission of a device upstream of the ion trap or ion accumulation region may be switched between two or more known values, to thereby achieve similar effects to those described above.
(97) In this case, a transmission altering device may be provided upstream of an ion trap, e.g. such that instead of altering the accumulation time (as discussed above), the transmission is altered, e.g. with a constant trapping time. That is, an ion trap may be configured to accept ions at all times, but the ion beam upstream of the ion trap may be thinned out or chopped, e.g. with a known duty cycle. In these embodiments, any chopping of the ion beam should be synchronised to the start and end times of the ion accumulation in the ion trap.
(98) According to various embodiments, the approach according to various embodiments can be applied to feedback modes of operation.
(99) According to various embodiments, the approach of comparing two data sets to decide which to utilise can also be applied to “ToF only” DRE experiments that do not necessarily involve ion traps.
(100) According to various embodiments, the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) values measured for individual peaks may be compared between the high and low transmission data sets. If the mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) differs significantly for individual peaks (i.e. within statistical tolerances), it can in various embodiments be inferred that the data associated with this mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) in the high transmission spectra has exceeded the dynamic range of the system e.g. due to space charge effects. Data for this mass to charge ratio (“m/z”) value may then be taken from the low transmission data set scaled by the appropriate factor.
(101) Similarly, according to various embodiments, the ratio of intensities in the high and low transmission spectra for individual peaks may be calculated and compared to the known attenuation ratio. This information may then be used to select data from the high and low transmission data sets or spectra to combine into a composite high dynamic range data set or spectrum.
(102) According to various embodiments, for targeted experiments the ratio of the isotope peaks in each data set or spectrum may be compared between the high and low transmission data sets, and may be used in the manner of the embodiments described above, i.e. to determine whether saturated and/or distorted data is present.
(103) According to various further embodiments, rather than forming first and second groups of ions by varying the accumulation time in respect of the first and second groups of ions, plural initial groups of ions comprising substantially equal or similar numbers of ions may be formed, e.g. by accumulating or trapping groups of ions for substantially equal times (or otherwise), and then first and second groups of ions comprising differing numbers of ions may be formed from the initial groups of ions, e.g. by extracting or otherwise separating different portions (e.g. different percentages) of ions from different ones of the initial groups of ions.
(104) By extracting or separating different amounts of ions from each of plural different initial groups of ions, a dynamic range enhancement (DRE) can be effected in a corresponding manner to that described above.
(105) Furthermore, in these embodiments, filling the ion trap 2 for the same time for each accumulation cycle, and ensuring that the composition of the initial ion population is uniform over the trapping (spatial) dimension (prior to the extraction or separation), ensures that the portion (percentage) of the ion population (the first or second group of ions) extracted from the trap 2 and subsequently separated is representative of the composition of the entire population of ions, even when a very low proportion of ions is extracted from the trap 2.
(106) This can avoid problems associated with ions of different mobilities taking different times to traverse the gate region at the entrance of the trap 2, e.g. because as the accumulation time becomes shorter, ions of lower mobility may not traverse the gate or trap entrance region and may be subsequently lost when the gate is closed to terminate the ion accumulation time. This means that, in these embodiments, the first and the second groups of ions may be more representative, thereby reducing spectral distortion and quantitative errors in the data.
(107) The initial groups of ions may be extracted or otherwise separated from the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region in any suitable and desired manner.
(108) In various embodiments, an initial group of ions may be spatially separated or segmented within an ion trap, trapping or accumulation region. This may be achieved, for example, by raising a DC barrier inside the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region so as to segment the initial group of ions into two (or more) differently sized portions. The appropriate portion of ions may then be accelerated into a downstream device (e.g. separation (IMS) device), for analysis, etc., e.g. as described above.
(109) In various other embodiments, only a portion of an initial group of ions may be ejected from an ion trap, trapping or accumulation region.
(110) This may be achieved, for example, by trapping ions within an ion trap, trapping or accumulation region that has at least one relatively extended dimension (e.g. length, width or height), and by allowing ions to exit the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region only through a relatively compact (in the at least one dimension) exit aperture or region. Alternatively, ions may be ejected from the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region using a pusher electrode that is relatively compact (in the at least one dimension). For example, an initial group of ions may be trapped within a linear or planar ion trap, trapping or accumulation region, wherein the line (linear trapping region) or plane (planar trapping region) in which ions are trapped is relatively extended in comparison to an exit aperture or region of the trap and/or in comparison to a pusher electrode.
(111) Alternatively, an initial group of ions may be trapped within an ion trap, trapping or accumulation region that has at least one relatively extended dimension (e.g. length, width or height) relative to an entrance aperture or acceptance area of a downstream device (e.g. IMS device). For example, an initial group of ions may be trapped within a linear or planar ion trap, trapping or accumulation region, wherein the line (linear trapping region) or plane (planar trapping region) in which ions are trapped is relatively extended in comparison to an entrance aperture or acceptance area of a downstream device. A central axis of the line (linear trapping region) or plane (planar trapping region) may be orthogonal to a central axis of the downstream device (e.g. IMS device). Some or all of the ions in the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region may be accelerated or otherwise ejected from the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region into the downstream device, e.g. such that only a portion of the ions are received or onwardly transmitted by the downstream device (e.g. IMS device).
(112) In these embodiments, the ejected portion of ions may then be analysed (separated, etc.), e.g. as described above.
(113) In these embodiments, the unused portion(s) of the initial groups of ions may be discarded or otherwise.
(114) In these embodiments, it may be beneficial to wait for each of the initial groups of ions to become fully distributed throughout the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region in which the initial groups of ions are formed before extracting or otherwise separating the ions, e.g. to avoid any IMS-type separation effects, i.e. so that each of the first and second groups of ions is representative of the initial group of ions.
(115) Thus, according to various embodiments, a plurality of initial groups of ions are formed by, e.g., for each of the initial groups of ions, accumulating ions for a period of time in an ion trap or other accumulation region.
(116) One or more first groups of ions may then be formed by, for each of the first groups of ions extracting or separating a first portion or all of the ions from an initial group of ions, and one or more second groups of ions may be formed by, for each of the second groups of ions extracting or separating a second different portion (i.e. less than all) of the ions from an initial group of ions.
(117) The one or more first groups of ions may be analysed to generate one or more first data sets, and the one or more second groups of ions may be analysed to generate one or more second data sets, e.g. as described above. It may then be determined whether the one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data, e.g. as described above. If (when) it is determined that the one or more first data sets comprise saturated and/or distorted data, then the saturated and/or distorted data from the one or more first data sets may be replaced with corresponding data from the one or more second data sets, e.g. as described above.
(118) Each of the initial groups of ions may comprise a substantially equal quantity of ions, and the second portion may be less than the first portion, i.e. such that each of the one or more second groups of ions may comprise fewer ions than each of the one or more first groups of ions.
(119) Ion may be allowed to disperse equally throughout the ion trap, trapping or accumulation region in which the initial groups of ions are formed before they are extracted or separated, e.g. such that the first and/or second groups of ions are representative of the initial group of ions.
(120) These embodiments can (and in various embodiments do) include any one or more or all of the optional features described herein.
(121) Thus, for example, on average relatively more of the high transmission (first) groups of ions may be formed than the low transmission (second) groups of ions.
(122) The rate at which alternate first and second groups of ions are accumulated and analysed may be such that the composition of consecutive first and second groups of ions are substantially the same, e.g. as described above.
(123) A group of ions may be separated according to one or more first physico-chemical properties before they are analysed, e.g. as described above.
(124) A group of ions may be formed (e.g. accumulated and/or extracted or separated) at the same time as analysing one or more other groups of ions, e.g. as described above.
(125) A group of ions may be formed (e.g. accumulated and/or extracted or separated) at the same time as separating according to one or more first physico-chemical properties one or more other groups of ions, e.g. as described above.
(126) A separation device may be operated in a cyclical manner so as to repeatedly separate respective groups of ions according to the one or more first physico-chemical properties, and ions may be accumulated (and extracted or separated) and analysed repeatedly in synchronism with the cycle time of the separation device, e.g. as described above.
(127) A group of ions may be filtered according to one or more second physico-chemical properties before being analysed, e.g. as described above.
(128) A group of ions may be formed (e.g. accumulated and/or extracted or separated) at the same time as filtering according to one or more second physico-chemical properties another groups of ions, e.g. as described above.
(129) Data from the one or more first data sets may be compared with data from the one or more second data sets in order to determine whether the one or more first data sets comprises saturated and/or distorted data, e.g. as described above.
(130) Accordingly, in various embodiments, ions may be accumulated in an ion trap, e.g. for each of plural repeating fixed time periods, i.e. so as to form substantially corresponding populations of ions (e.g. having the same or similar quantities of ions). A different portion or percentage of each of the populations may then be released into a downstream device (e.g. separator) and the remaining ions within the ion trap may be discarded or directed elsewhere.
(131) For example 100% of the ions of an initial group of ions may be released from the ion trap, e.g. into the downstream separator, so as to form a “first” group of ions.
(132) As the first group of ions is separated by the separation device, another initial group of ions may be accumulated in the ion trap. At the end of this second accumulation, 10% of the group of ions may be released, e.g. into the downstream separator, so as to form a “second” group of ions.
(133) This may be repeated multiple times, i.e. from initial group of ions to initial group of ions, or one or plural first groups of ions may be formed followed by one or plural second groups of ions, and so on, e.g. as described above.
(134) The first and second groups of ions may be analysed, e.g. as described above.
(135) Data recorded from analysis of the first group(s) of ions and data recorded from analysis of the second group(s) of ions may then be combined into a single high dynamic range data set, e.g. after appropriate scaling, e.g. as described above. For example, where the portions respectively comprise 100% and 10% of the ions, the data derived from the second group of ions may be scaled by a factor of 10 times.
(136)
(137) As shown in
(138)
(139) As shown by
(140) Once ions have populated the entire ion trap 2, ions may be prevented from entering the trap 2, e.g. by applying a DC voltage to a gate electrode upstream of the trapping region 2. In various embodiments, the composition of the population of ions should be substantially constant throughout the length of the trap 2. This may be achieved (where necessary) by allowing the ions to remain in the ion trap 2 for a suitable period of time such that they become distributed throughout the ion trap 2.
(141) As shown in
(142) Ions outside of the trapping region or well may be ejected from the ion trap 2. As shown in
(143) Many different schemes for flushing unwanted ions from outside the small trapping region or well are envisaged, including for example, (i) the use of one or more travelling DC waves; (ii) the use of one or more deflection voltages; (iii) selectively lowering one or more of the RF confining voltages; or (iv) combinations of any of the schemes.
(144) After unwanted ions have left the trap region 2, the remaining ions may be released or transferred into the separator region 3. This is illustrated by
(145) This (“second”) group may then be separated in the separation region 3, e.g. by forcing the ions through the separation region 3 using one or more travelling DC waves and/or one or more static DC fields applied to the electrodes of the separation region 3.
(146) As shown in
(147) In these embodiments, “first” (high intensity) groups of ions may be formed by omitting the step of forming a relatively small trapping region or well within the trap 2 or by forming a relatively large trapping region or well within the trap 2 (e.g. in a corresponding manner to that discussed above).
(148)
(149) As shown in
(150) As shown in
(151) The ejected (“second”) group of ions may then be separated in the separation region 3, e.g. as described above.
(152) Once the desired ions have exited the trap 2, the remaining ions may be flushed out of the trapping region 2, e.g. by known methods.
(153) In these embodiments, “first” (high intensity) groups of ions may be formed by omitting the DC potential barriers 8 or by forming relatively smaller or narrower DC potential barriers 8.
(154) According to various embodiments, a combination of the variable accumulation time techniques and the variable ion population extraction techniques described herein may be used to produce the attenuated data. Combining these techniques can allow significantly more overall attenuation of the ion beam at the detector, e.g. compared to either technique alone. For example, a combination of a 1% accumulation time, and a 1% final extraction proportion will give a total attenuation of 0.01%.
(155) In various embodiments, the attenuation factor for different trap exit conditions may be appropriately characterised and calibrated.
(156) It will be appreciated from the above that various embodiments provide methods in which the dynamic range of mass spectral data and/or ion mobility-mass spectral (“IMS-MS”) data is increased. This improves quantitative results, mass accuracy and collision cross section measurement accuracy by reducing detector system saturation effects.
(157) Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims.