DIRECTION FINDING SYSTEM AND ANTENNA ARRAY

20240377494 ยท 2024-11-14

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A direction finding antenna array comprises at least a first dipole antenna element 14, a second dipole antenna element 16 and a third dipole antenna element 18. The dipole elements comprise respective first ends 14.1, 16.1, 18.1, respective second ends 14.2, 16.2, 18.2 and a respective feed-point 14.3, 16.3, 18.3. The first, second and third dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to one another in a non-linear pattern. In respect of each dipole element in the array (and taking dipole element 14 as an example), the first end 14.1 is connected by first and second electrical connections 24, 26 to the first end of each of two adjacent dipole elements 16, 18 in the array and the second end 14.2 is connected by third and fourth electrical connections 28, 30 to the second end of each of the two adjacent dipole elements 16, 18.

    Claims

    1. A direction finding antenna array comprising at least a first dipole antenna element, a second dipole antenna element and a third dipole antenna element, each comprising respective first ends, respective second ends and a respective feed-point, wherein the first, second and third dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to one another in a non-linear pattern, wherein, in respect of each dipole element in the array: a) the first end is connected by first and second electrical connections to the first end of each of only two adjacent dipole elements respectively in the array and b) the second end is connected by third and fourth electrical connections to the second end of each of only the two adjacent dipole elements respectively.

    2. The antenna array as claimed in claim 1 wherein the first end of the first antenna element is connected by the first and second electrical connections to the first end of adjacent second and third dipole elements respectively in the array and the second end of the first dipole element is connected by the third and fourth electrical connections to the second end of the adjacent second and third dipole elements respective.

    3. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 2 wherein the antenna array further comprises at least a fourth dipole antenna element and a fifth dipole antenna element, each comprising respective first ends, respective second ends and a respective feed-point, wherein the first, second, third, fourth and fifth dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to one another, wherein the first end of the fourth dipole element is connected by fifth and sixth electrical connections to respectively the first ends of the third and fifth dipole elements and wherein the second end of the fourth dipole element is connected by seventh and eighth electrical connections to respectively the second ends of the third and fifth dipole elements, wherein the first end of the fifth dipole element is connected to the first end of the second dipole element by a ninth electrical connection and wherein the second end of the fifth dipole element is connected to the second end of the second dipole element by a tenth electrical connection.

    4. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 3 wherein the first to fifth dipole elements are located at respective corners of a pentagon.

    5. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 1 wherein the dipole elements are linear in configuration.

    6. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 5 wherein the linear dipole elements are arranged vertically and parallel to one another.

    7. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 1 wherein each electrical connection comprises an elongate conductor.

    8. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 1 wherein each electrical connection comprises a filter network.

    9. The direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 1 wherein the respective feed-points are located in a common plane.

    10. A direction finding system comprising a direction finding antenna array as claimed in claim 1 and wherein the respective feed points are connected to respective inputs of coherent receivers of a receiver arrangement.

    11. The direction finding system as claimed in claim 10 wherein the receiver arrangement comprises at least one processor for executing a computer program comprising correlative direction-finding algorithms.

    12. A direction finding antenna array comprising: a first dipole antenna element comprising a first end, a second end and a first feedpoint; a second dipole antenna element comprising a third end, a fourth end and a second feedpoint; a third dipole antenna element comprising a fifth end, a sixth end and a third feedpoint; and a coherent receiver having first, second and third inputs connected respectively to the first feedpoint, the second feedpoint and the third feedpoint; wherein the first, second and third dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to and adjacent to one another in a non-linear pattern, wherein the first end is respectively connected by first and second electrical connections to the third end of the second dipole antenna element and to the fifth end of the third dipole antenna element to form first loop-like elements; wherein the second end is respectively connected by third and fourth electrical connections to the fourth end of the second dipole antenna element and to the sixth end of the third dipole antenna element to form second loop-like elements.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DIAGRAMS

    [0017] The invention will now further be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrams wherein:

    [0018] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a prior art multiple dipole DF antenna array;

    [0019] FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of an example embodiment of a direction finding (DF) antenna array according to the invention;

    [0020] FIG. 3 is a comparative graph of DF sensitivity v frequency for the DF antenna array in FIG. 2 and for the prior art multiple dipole DF antenna array in FIG. 1;

    [0021] FIG. 4 is a comparative graph of normalized cross-polarization isolation v frequency of the DF antenna array in FIG. 2 and for the prior art multiple dipole DF antenna array in FIG. 1; and

    [0022] FIG. 5 is a comparative graph of DF accuracy of the DF antenna array in FIG. 2 and for the prior art multiple dipole DF antenna array in FIG. 1.

    DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

    [0023] An example embodiment of a direction finding (DF) system 10 and an antenna array 12 therefor are shown in FIG. 2.

    [0024] The DF system 10 comprises the DF antenna array 12 connected to a receiver arrangement 32. The DF antenna array comprises at least a first dipole antenna element 14, a second dipole antenna element 16 and a third dipole antenna element 18. The dipole elements comprise respective first ends 14.1, 16.1, 18.1, respective second ends 14.2, 16.2, 18.2 and a respective feed-point 14.3, 16.3, 18.3. The first, second and third dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to one another in a non-linear pattern. In respect of each dipole element in the array (and taking dipole element 14 as an example), the first end 14.1 is connected by first and second electrical connections 24, 26 to the first end of each of two adjacent dipole elements 16, 18 in the array and the second end 14.2 is connected by third and fourth electrical connections 28, 30 to the second end of each of the two adjacent dipole elements 16, 18.

    [0025] The receiver arrangement 32 comprises at least three receivers having respective inputs 34.1, 34.2, 34.3 which are respectively connectable to the feed-points 14.3, 16.3, 18.3, respectively.

    [0026] In a preferred example embodiment as shown in FIG. 2, the antenna array 12 further comprises a fourth dipole antenna element 20 and a fifth dipole antenna element 22. The dipole elements comprise respective first ends 20.1, 22.1, respective second ends 20.2, 22.2 and a respective feed-point 20.3, 22.3. The first, second, third, fourth and fifth dipole elements are arranged in spaced relationship relative to one another. The first end 20.1 of the fourth dipole element 20 is connected by fifth and sixth electrical connections 36, 38 to respectively the first ends 18.1, 22.1 of the third and fifth dipole elements. The second end 20.2 of the fourth dipole element 20 is connected by seventh and eighth electrical connections 40, 42 to respectively the second ends 18.2, 22.2 of the third and fifth dipole elements. The first end 22.1 of the fifth dipole element 22 is connected to the first end 16.1 of the second dipole element 16 by a ninth electrical connection 44 and the second end 22.2 of the fifth dipole element 22 is connected to the second end 16.2 of the second dipole element 16 by a tenth electrical connection 46.

    [0027] In this preferred embodiment, the receiver arrangement 32 further comprises fourth and fifth receivers with respective inputs 34.4, 34.5 which are respectively connected to the respective feed-points 20.3, 22.3.

    [0028] The dipole element need not be, but preferably are linear in configuration.

    [0029] As shown in FIG. 2, the first to fifth linear dipole elements 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 22 are located at respective corners of a pentagon. The first to fifth dipole elements are arranged vertically and parallel to one another. First parts of each linear dipole element extend from the respective feed-point upwardly to terminate at the first ends and second parts extend from the respective feed-point downwardly to terminate at the second end.

    [0030] Each of the first to tenth electrical connections 24, 26, 28, 20, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44 and 46 comprises a linear elongate conductor. In other embodiments, at least some of the elongate electrical connections may comprise a filter circuit.

    [0031] The respective feed-points 14.3, 16.3, 18.3, 20.3, 22.3 are located in a common plane.

    [0032] There is hence provided a closed structure comprising the vertically extending linear dipole elements 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 22 and the horizontally extending elongate electrical connections 24, 26, 28, 20, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44 and 46 between the ends of adjacent linear dipole elements. The resulting loop-like elements (such as the loop-like element formed by linear dipole element 14, elongate electrical connection 26, linear dipole element 18, and elongate electrical connection 30) in the structure is not a pure loop construction, in the sense that it will not work as a single loop element. The arrangement has, as a necessary feature, connections of a loop-like element to its neighbouring loop-like elements to form a closed structure 12 consisting of many (in this example embodiment five (5)) of these loop-like elements. This structure is clearly distinguishable from other loop structures such as a differentially fed loop, and other traditional loop designs which are always used as stand-alone elements.

    [0033] The receiver arrangement 32 may comprise a processor (not shown) and the processor may execute a computer program comprising correlative direction-finding algorithms. All the feed points 14.3 to 22.3 of the array 12 are directly connected to respective coherent receivers of the arrangement 32 and allow for multiple combinations to be generated in software (after digitization). In contrast, differentially fed loops impose a fixed 180 degree phase shift which is then combined into a single feed point into a receiver.

    [0034] The fact that each of the feed points 14.3 to 22.3 are connected to a respective coherent receiver is of particular importance, since the physical/galvanic connection between the linear dipole elements allows for multiple feed points along the array to act as pairs that create unique and information rich sources. For example, adjacent feed points 14.3 and 16.3 create a small loop that will have a significantly different radiation pattern when combined, compared to feed points 14.3 and 18.3, which create a much larger loop-like structure compared to the combined feed points 14.3 and 16.3. In both cases, the resulting radiation pattern, and consequently the nature of the information available to the DF algorithm, is fundamentally different from those of either a traditional loop or dipole array.

    [0035] Although the electrical inter-connection of neighbouring dipole elements in DF dipole arrays is generally considered by those skilled in the art to be detrimental to the overall performance of the array, it has been found by the applicant, surprisingly so, that the low-frequency performance, more particularly the low-frequency DF sensitivity, the cross-polarisation isolation and susceptibility to coupling to conductive array mounting structures of the antenna array 12 is substantially better than that of the prior art dipole array in FIG. 1. This unexpected improved performance is graphically illustrated by the simulated results in FIG. 3, where the sensitivity of the prior art dipole array of FIG. 1 is shown in broken lines and the sensitivity of the array 12 is shown in solid lines. The improvement at frequencies smaller than 100 MHz is self-evident. In the simulation an array 12 with dipole elements of 500 mm in length (which is /20 at 30 MHZ) and an array diameter of 1200 mm were used.

    [0036] The simulated results in FIG. 4 exhibit an unexpected improvement in cross-polarisation isolation of roughly 10 dB of the antenna array 12 over that of the conventional dipole array for frequencies below 10 MHz, where the isolation of the prior art dipole array of FIG. 1 is shown in broken lines and the isolation of the array 12 is shown in solid lines.

    [0037] The antenna array 12 exhibits superior immunity to central mounting structures compared to that of conventional dipole arrays, as can be seen from the simulated results in FIG. 5 below. Note that the DF accuracy of the array 12 stays below 0.5 deg for both vertically polarized (VP) and slant-polarised signals, while the prior art dipole array suffers from a fatal breakdown in accuracy when exposed to a slant-polarised signal. This breakdown is caused by the presence of the mounting structure, whereas the array 12 appears to be immune to the presence of the mounting structure.