ACTIVE PEPTIDE FOR INHIBITING AMPA RECEPTOR AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF

Abstract

Provided is an active peptide for inhibiting an AMPA receptor and a preparation method and use thereof. The method for preparing the active peptide comprises the following steps: 1) soaking a salmon skin and crushing, adding water and beating, and then adjusting pH to 6.5-7.5; 2) subjecting to a first enzymolysis using a neutral protease; 3) subjecting to a second enzymolysis using papain enzyme and then inactivating enzyme; and 4) centrifuging the enzymatic hydrolysate, and then subjecting the centrifuged supernatant to membrane filtration, concentration and decoloration, to prepare the active peptide. The active peptide contains a tetrapeptide with an amino-acid sequence of Glu-Gly-Ala-Arg. The tetrapeptide has good solubility, can selectively inhibit neuronal synaptic transmission caused by an AMPA receptor, and has a significant antiepileptic effect.

Claims

1. A method for preparing an active peptide, comprising the following steps: 1) soaking a salmon skin and crushing, adding water and beating, and then adjusting pH to 6.5-7.5, to obtain a slurry; 2) subjecting the slurry to a first enzymolysis by using a neutral protease, to obtain a first enzymatic hydrolysate; 3) subjecting the first enzymatic hydrolysate to a second enzymolysis by using papain enzyme and then inactivating enzyme, to botain a second enzymatic hydrolysate; and 4) centrifuging the second enzymatic hydrolysate, and then subjecting the centrifuged supernatant to membrane filtration, concentration and decoloration, to prepare the active peptide; wherin the active peptide contains a tetrapeptide with an amino-acid sequence of Glu-Gly-Ala-Arg.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein an alkaline solution with a mass content of 0.1-0.5% is used to soak the salmon skin, a mass/volume ratio of the salmon skin to the alkaline solution is controlled to 1:(2-4), and soaking time is 5-20 h.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the neutral protease is 50-500 U/g, and the amount of the papain is 100-1000 U/g, and an amount ratio of the neutral protease to the papain is 1:(1-3).

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein a temperature of the first enzymolysis is controlled to 30-60 C., time of the first enzymolysis is 4-6 h, and a temperature of the second enzymolysis is controlled to 30-60 C., and time of the second enzymolysis is 1-3 h.

5. The method according to claim 3, wherein a temperature of the first enzymolysis is controlled to 30-60 C., time of the first enzymolysis is 4-6 h, and a temperature of the second enzymolysis is controlled to 30-60 C., and time of the second enzymolysis is 1-3 h.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the membrane filtration is proceeded with a ceramic membrane with a pore diameter of 50-1000 nm.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: separating and purifying the active peptide by using a reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography, to obtain the tetrapeptide with an amino acid sequence of Glu-Gly-Ala-Arg.

8. An active peptide prepared according to the method of claim 1.

9. A tetrapeptide for inhibiting an AMPA receptor, wherein the tetrapeptide has an amino acid sequence of Glu-Gly-Ala-Arg.

10. Use of the active peptide of claim 8 in preparation of an antiepileptic food or drug.

11. Use of the tetrapeptide for inhibiting an AMPA receptor of claim 9 in preparation of an antiepileptic food or drug.

12. A method for treating epilepsy, comprising administrating to an epileptic patient a drug containing a therapeutically effective amount of a tetrapeptide with an amino acid sequence of Glu-Gly-Ala-Arg.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] FIG. 1 is an RP-HPLC chromatogram of an active peptide prepared in Example 1.

[0027] FIG. 2A to FIG. 2D are computer simulation graphs of EGAR binding to an AMPA receptor.

[0028] FIG. 3A to FIG. 3G are electrophysiological graphs of EPSC and mEPSC of mouse hippocampal slices.

[0029] FIG. 4A to FIG. 4D are electrophysiological graphs of AMPAR-mediated EPSC of mouse hippocampal slices.

[0030] FIG. 5A to FIG. 5H are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR selectively inhibiting AMPAR-mediated mEPSC.

[0031] FIG. 6A to FIG. 6D are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR selectively inhibiting AMPA-induced currents.

[0032] FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR inhibiting epilepsy-like discharge of a hippocampal neuron induced by low magnesium external liquid.

[0033] FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B show an effect of EGAR on PTZ-induced mouse epilepsy.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] To make objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more clear, technical solutions in examples of the present application will be clearly and completely described with reference to drawings and the examples of the present application. Obviously, the examples described are part of examples of the present application, rather than all examples. Based on the examples in the present application, all other examples obtained by those skilled in the art without creative work belong to the protection scope of the present application.

[0035] Raw materials used in each example of the present application and sources thereof are as follows: Neutral protease: from Novozymes biotechnology Co., Ltd; [0036] TTX, PTX, CNQX, APV, NMDA, and AMPA: from TOCRIS Bioscience; [0037] Papain, PTZ: From Sigma Aldrich; and [0038] Synthetic EGAR: from Shanghai Qiang Yao Co., Ltd.

EXAMPLE 1

Preparation of an Active Peptide

[0039] 1. Preparation of the Active Peptide

[0040] 5 kg of salmon skin is settled to a volume of 15 L by NaOH solution with a mass content of 0.2%, soaked for 12 h at normal temperature, and drained. The salmon skin is crushed, and beaten with deionized water that is 5 times salmon skin weight, and after pH is adjusted to 7.0, a slurry is obtained.

[0041] Neutral protease is added to the above slurry in an amount of 0.1% (i.e. 400 U/g salmon skin), and is subjected to enzymolysis for 5 hours at 50 C. Then papain is added to enzymatic hydrolysate in an amount of 0.2% (i.e. 400 U/g salmon skin), and the enzymolysis is continuously proceeded for 2 h at 60 C. After completion of the enzymolysis, enzyme inactivation is proceeded for 10 minutes at 100 C.

[0042] The enzymatic hydrolysate is centrifuged after the enzyme inactivation, and the centrifuged supernatant is subjected to membrane filtration by using a ceramic membrane (from Xiamen Starmen) with a pore diameter of 200 nm, clear liquid obtained after membrane filtration is concentrated to a concentration of 30 Baume by using R-151 concentrator (from BUCHI, Switzerland), then an activated carbon is added to the concentrated solution in an amount of 20%, to decolorize at 55 C. for 1 hour. After filtering to remove the activated carbon, the clear liquid is spray-dried, to obtain 620 g of active peptide.

[0043] 2. Structural Identification of the Active Peptide

[0044] The active peptide prepared as above is diluted to a concentration of 2 mg/mL with deionized water, a gradient elution is performed using RP-HPLC (XBridge BEH130, 4.6*250 nm, Waters company, US). Elution conditions are as follows: [0045] Mobile phase A: V(water):V(trifluoroacetic acid)=100:0.1; [0046] Mobile phase B: V(acetonitrile):V(water):V(trifluoroacetic acid)=80:20:0.1; [0047] Detection wavelength: UV220 nm; [0048] Flow velocity: 0.6 mL/min; [0049] Column temperature: 32 C.; [0050] Injection volume: 50 L; [0051] Gradient program: 0-10 min, mobile phase B: 0%-5%; 10-20 min, mobile phase B: 5%-5%; 20-35 min, mobile phase B: 5%-9%; 35-45 min, mobile phase B: 9%-13%;

[0052] 45-60 min, mobile phase B: 13%-13%; 60-70 min, mobile phase B: 13%-70%; and 70-90 min, mobile phase B:70%-70%.

[0053] As shown in FIG. 1, there are 11 major absorption peaks appeared during the gradient elution of the active peptide prepared as above. Eluents corresponding to the 11 major absorption peaks are collected, and sequence of polypeptide in each component is analyzed by using Q-TOF2 mass spectrometer (Micromass, Britain). The results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Polypeptide sequence in each component Component No. Polypeptide sequence 1 WYN, NTTM, NGGGGS, PALH 2 AGGP, QK, MADT, NK, NPR 3 TQ, RGF, NAGK, SR, QGAK 4 YSAP, DAGK, GR, SSP, KR, AK, GGH, DSGDG 5 AGPS, GAAGR, AP, VDGK, RER 6 PQ, GPR, GPQG, TGVE, ARGGK, EGAR 7 VR, LN, VTGK, GHAGE, VGGK, GHGR 8 SPGAG, FTE, AGGPLG, TGGPK, GAGGMT 9 AAGPGL, VEKEKH, TGPK, LQ 10 SGGE, NVG, GPAG, PNH, PH 11 VL, LIE, TPT

EXAMPLE 2

Molecular Dynamic Simulation Test

[0054] AMBER11 simulation suite is used for molecular dynamic simulation and data analysis. Full atom point charge force field (AMBER FF03) shows a good balance between the results of -helix and -sheet and is used to describe a peptide. Aqueous solvent is expressly represented by TIP3P model. Parameters generated by EGAR are as follows: after geometry optimization, electrostatic potential of EGAR is obtained at HF/6-31G**level. Part of charges is derived from use of a restricted electrostatic potential (RESP) method to match gas phase electrostatic potential, and other mechanical parameters of EGAR molecule are taken from AMBER GAFF parameter set. The missing interaction parameters in the ligand are generated using antechamber tools in AMBER. The system is firstly minimized using steepest descent algorithm in 2000 steps, and then is subjected to MD simulation of 5 nanoseconds by using NPT entirety. Pressure is coupled to 1 bar with 1.0 ps anisotropic connection time, and the temperature during simulation is maintained at 300K with 0.1 PS coupling time. Long-range electrostatic is calculated with the particle mesh Ewald Method (PEM). SHAKE is used to limit a hydrogen atom-connecting bond, so that time step is 2.0 fs in simulation. Two fixed points, 0.8 nanometers and 1.2 nanometers, are used to evaluate non-bonded interaction respectively. Then, binding energy at 300K is estimated by using MM-GBSA. CPU of 192 AMD Opteron (tm) processor (2.0 GHz) is used for the above calculation.

[0055] FIG. 2A to FIG. 2D are computer simulation graphs of EGAR binding to an AMPA receptor. Wherein, EGAR-AMPAR complex morphology in FIG. 2A shows that EGAR is bound to S1S2 domain of AMPAR; FIG. 2B shows that a hydrogen bond is formed between Arg219 and Gly73 residues of AMPAR and EGAR; FIG. 2C shows a distance between EGAR and AMPAR in 5000 ps simulation, and RMSD of AMPAR remains stable at about 1.75 angstroms in three repetitive simulations, which indicates the complex is relatively stable; FIG. 2D shows time dependence of distances of three strong hydrogen bonds between EGAR and AMPAR ((Glu-OE1)-219Arg, (Glu-OE2)-219Arg, Arg-73Gly), and distances between hydrogen donors and receptors are less than 3.5 angstroms.

[0056] The above results show: EGAR can stably bind to an AMPA receptor.

EXAMPLE 3

Animal Experiment

[0057] This animal experiment protocol is approved by the animal care and use committee of Zhongshan University, and meets the experimental animal usage criteria of national health mechanism.

[0058] 1. Reagents, Animals and Materials

[0059] ACSF: containing 124 mM sodium chloride, 2.5 mM potassium chloride, 2 mM calcium chloride, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 1.25 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 26 mM sodium bicarbonate and 10 mM glucose; and saturated to pH 7.2-7.4 with 95% O.sub.2/5% CO.sub.2.

[0060] C57BL/6 mice: 2-3 weeks old, 15-20 grams, each captive in a cage at 20-22 C., free access to food and water, and kept in an environment of 12 hour light/dark cycle.

[0061] EGAR solution: a synthetic EGAR freeze-dried powder is dissolved in 115 L of distilled water to be used as a stock solution, and during experiment the stock solution is diluted with the above AXSF to EGAR solutions with final concentrations of 100 M, 50 M, 20 M, and 1 M respectively for use.

[0062] Internal liquid: containing 140 mM potassium gluconate, 5 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM calcium chloride, 2 mM MgATP, 10 mM EGTA and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2-7.4, being subject to aseptic filtration before recording.

[0063] External liquid: containing 140 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM potassium chloride, 1.5 mM calcium chloride, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 10 mM HEPES and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.2-7.4; being subject to aseptic filtration before recording.

[0064] 2. Preparation of Brain Tissue

[0065] Hippocampus is taken from a C57BL/6 mouse to do whole-cell recording. The mouse is deep narcotized with 20% urethane before being decollated, then its brain is rapidly removed and immersed in ice-cold ACSF, then the brain is trimmed, and fixed onto a vibration slicer (Leica VT1000A, Germany) to be cut into coronal slices of 350 microns. The slices are incubated with ACSF for at least 1 hour at room temperature before recording.

[0066] 3. Electrophysiological Experiment

[0067] The slices of the hippocampus are transferred to an underwater recording room (Warner instrument). In the recording room, the slices are continuously perfused with ACSF at a speed of 3ml/min, and whole-cell records of neurons of CA1 region of the hippocampus are performed by those experimenters who are not distinguished between a control group and a treated group. The neurons are identified through morphological recognition using an infrared ray differential interference phase-contrast microscope (BX51W, Olympus, Japan). A borosilicate microtube of 1.5 mm (external diameter)0.86 mm (internal diameter) is drawn via a flame Brown electrode drawing instrument (P-97, Sutter instrument) using a 4 stage drawing scheme, to form a recording electrode with a resistance between 6-9 megohms. The recording electrode for recording is filled with above-mentioned internal liquid, and a whole-cell recording is proceeded by using above-mentioned external liquid.

[0068] Bipolar polytetrafluoroethylene insulated iridium is used to perform a voltage-clamp recording of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs), and platinum microelectrode (AM system) is induced at a frequency of 0.0167 Hz. Records are taken by a Multiclamp 700B amplifier, filtered at 10 kHz, sampled at 200 microseconds, and recorded to a personal computer by using pClamp10.2 software, and then analyzed by using Axon Digidata 1440A and pClamp10.2 (Molecular Devices).

[0069] Experiments mentioned below are carried out respectively, and the results are represented by an average valueS.E.M. In addition to data analysis of cumulative probability by the means of K-S test, statistical analyses of biological data are all performed by using T-test. All the statistical analyses are done by using SPSS 13.0 software.

[0070] (1) EPSCs of slices treated by EGAR are recorded, while EPSCs of slices without EGAR treatment is as contrast, and 10 M of PTX is added into the external liquid to separate mEPSCs out.

[0071] FIG. 3A to FIG. 3G are electrophysiological graphs of EPSC and mEPSC of mouse hippocampal slices. Wherein: FIG. 3A shows sample traces of EPSCs that are recorded from pyramidal cells of CA1 region before and after EGAR administration; bar charts of EPSC amplitudes in FIG. 3B show a significant difference between control group and EGAR treated groups at 20 M (**P<0.03), 50 M (**P<0.03) and 100 M (**P<0.03); FIG. 3C is mEPSC records of pyramidal cells of CA1 region; histograms of FIG. 3D show that compared with the control group, the slices treated with EGAR has no change at mEPSC frequencies; cumulative probabilities of mEPSC event intervals in FIG. 3E show that there is no difference between a control group and EGAR treated groups at concentrations; bar charts of FIG. 3F show amplitudes of mEPSCs of EGAR treated groups at 20 M (**P<0.03), 50 M (**P<0.03) and 100 M (**P<0.03) all reduce; cumulative probabilities of mEPSC amplitudes in FIG. 3G show an amplitude of EGAR treated groups at concentrations is reduced compared with a control group (K-S test, p<0.05).

[0072] The above results show: in isolated hippocampal slices experiment, a certain concentration of EGAR can inhibit excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) and micro excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC).

[0073] (2) after blocking components of NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs by adding 50 M of D-APV to ACSF and blocking AMPAR-mediated EPSCs by adding 10 M of CNQX to ACSF, remaining EPSCs of both them are also recorded. 10 M of PTX is added in external liquid to isolate mEPSCs. After 10 M of CNQX and 20 M of EGAR and also 50 M of D-APV(an antagonist of NMDA receptor) and 20 M of EGAR are added to ACSF, mEPSCs are also recorded. By adding 10 M of CNQX or 50 M of D-APV to ACSF, NMDAR-mediated or AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs are isolated.

[0074] FIG. 4A to FIG. 4D are electrophysiological graphs of AMPAR-mediated EPSC of mouse hippocampal slices. Wherein: FIG. 4A shows representative tracks of hippocampal CA1 region treated with 50 M of D-APV (an antagonist of NMDA receptor) before and after adding 20 M of EGAR; FIG. 4B shows representative tracks of CA 1 region of hippocampal slices treated with 10 M of CNQX (a competitive antagonist of non-NMDA receptor) before and after adding 20 M of EGAR; FIG. 4C is a bar chart showing that an amplitude of AMPAR-mediated EPSC of a treated group added with 50 M of D-APV and 20 M of EGAR is significantly lower compared with an amplitude of AMPAR-mediated EPSC of a control group (***P<0.01, and in t test, n=6); FIG. 4D is a bar chart showing that an amplitude of NMADR-mediated EPSC of a treated group in which neurons are treated with 10 M of CNQX and then 20UM of EGAR is added is not changed compared with an amplitude of NMADR-mediated EPSC of a control group (P>0.05, t test, n=6).

[0075] The above results show: EGAR can selectively inhibit AMPAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC).

[0076] (3) With regard to a NMDAR-mediated current record, 100 M of NMDA is added into the above-mentioned external liquid; and with regard to an AMPAR-mediated current record, 20 M of AMPA is added into above-mentioned external liquid.

[0077] FIG. 5A to FIG. 5H are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR selectively inhibiting AMPAR-mediated mEPSC. Wherein: FIG. 5A shows sample traces of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs of a control group and a EGAR treated group; FIG. 5B is a bar chart showing that compared with a control group, frequencies of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs of neurons treated with EGAR do not change (P>0.05, t test, and N=6); cumulative probabilities of mEPSC event intervals in FIG. 5C show there is no difference in frequency between a control group and a EGAR treated group (K-S test, p>0.05, n=6); bar charts of FIG. SD represent that according to records of neurons treated by EGAR, amplitude of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs decline compared with a control group (*P<0.05, t test, n=6); cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs amplitudes of FIG. 5E show that compared with a control group, an amplitude of a EGAR treated group reduces (K-S test, p<0.05, n=6); FIG. SF shows representative tracks of NMDA receptor-mediated mEPSCs of CA1 neurons treated with NMDA (100 M) before and after adding EGAR(20 M); FIG. 5G is a bar chart showing an quantization effect of an influence of 100 M of NMDA plus 20 M of EGAR on amplitudes of NMDAR-mediated mEPSCs, and the result shows that there is no significant difference between groups (P>0.05, t test, n=6); FIG. 5H is a bar chart showing an quantization effect of an influence of 100 M of NMDA plus 20 M of EGAR on frequencies of NMDAR-mediated mEPSCs, and the result shows that there is no significant difference between groups (P>0.05, t test, N=6).

[0078] The above results show: EGAR can selectively inhibit AMPA-mediated micro excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC).

[0079] (4) With regard to records of currents induced by NMDA, 100 M of NMDA is added into above-mentioned external liquid; with regard to records of currents induced by AMPA, 20 M of AMPA is added into above-mentioned external liquid.

[0080] FIG. 6A to FIG. 6D are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR selectively inhibiting a current induced by AMPA. Wherein: FIG. 6A shows representative tracks of patch clamp experiments, which show an inward current induced by 20 M of AMPA is reduced in the presence of EGAR, where the horizontal bar indicates application time of the used drug, the upper trace and the middle trace respectively indicate an AMPA processing and a co-processing of AMPA and 20 M of EGAR, and the lower trace indicates the portion that AMPA is reacted returns to a control level after EGAR being washed away, and the cell is voltage-clamped at 70 mV; FIG. 6B is a bar chart showing an quantization effect of 20 M of AMPA plus 20 M of EGAR on a peak current of AMPA, and the result shows that there is a significant difference between groups (***P<0.01, in t test, n=6); FIG. 6C shows an effect of 20 M of EGAR on a current induced by NMDA; FIG. 6D is a bar chart showing a quantization effect of 100 M of NMDA plus 20 M of EGAR on a peak current of NMDA, and the result shows that there is no significant difference between groups (P>0.05, t test, n=6).

[0081] The above results show: EGAR can selectively inhibit a current induced by AMPA.

[0082] (5) In an experiment of nominal zero magnesium, magnesium ions are replaced by sodium ions with the same osmotic concentration.

[0083] FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B are electrophysiological graphs of EGAR inhibiting epilepsy-like discharge of a hippocampal neuron induced by a low magnesium external liquid. Wherein: FIG. 7A shows peak currents induced by low magnesium under the condition of having and having no 20 M of EGA treatment, and a trace of the sample recovered after washing; FIG. 7B is a bar chart showing an quantization effect of 20 M of EGAR on a frequency of a peak current caused by low magnesium, and results show that there is a significant difference between groups (*P<0.05, t test, n=6).

[0084] The above results show: EGAR can inhibit epilepsy-like discharge of a hippocampal neuron inducted by a low magnesium external liquid.

[0085] (6) Effect of EGAR on electrophysiological properties of a neuron, and the results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect of EGAR on electrophysiological properties of a neuron 20 uM of EGAR Control group treated group Resting potential, mV 68.57 2.16 65.57 1.23 Input resistance, M 163.71 7.29 164.57 9.96 Membrane capacitance, pF 20.64 0.79 19.07 0.67 Amplitude, mV 89.43 0.2 87.61 1.18 Action potential half width, ms 0.95 0.01 0.99 0.01 Frequency, Hz 14.11 3.84 13.53 2.42 Threshold potential, mV 46.26 0.5 45.61 0.2

[0086] The results of table 2 show: EGAR has no significant effect on electrophysiological parameters of a CA1 neuron.

[0087] 4. Model of PTZ-Induced Epilepsy Seizure

[0088] In order to determine anticonvulsive effect of EGAR, the degree of epilepsy after EGAR treatment is evaluated for the model of PTZ-induced epilepsy seizure. EGAR is injected into animals earlier 30 minutes than PTZ. The animals are randomly divided into 4 groups, and each group has 10 animals. 4 groups are given EGAR at 0, 1, 10 and 100 mg/kg respectively. All animals are intraperitoneally injected with PTZ at a dose of 55 mg/kg, and this dose can produce clonic seizures in all control animals.

[0089] Behaviors of mice are observed for 30 minutes immediately after PTZ injection. Two well-trained observers who do not know previous results analyze the behaviors of mice. Mice are placed in a transparent plastic cage, and are observed for 30 minutes. The cage is thoroughly cleaned by using wet/dry cloth and any olfactory clue is removed with 70% ethanol. Animals that show rampage and forelimb clonus or more serious behavior (rampage, clonus and fall down) are considered to be epilepsy in mouse brain edge. Epilepsy seizure is scored according to the following criteria: 0, no response; 1, immobile; 2, taste movement and grasping; 3, tremor; 4, head shaking; 5, rampage and forelimb clonus; 6, rampage, clonus and fall down; 7, death.

[0090] FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B show an effect of EGAR on PTZ-induced mouse epilepsy. Wherein: FIG. 8A shows behavior scores of 5 groups of mice treated with PBS, 1 mg/kg EGAR1, 10 mg/kg EGAR1 and 100 mg/kg EGAR1, respectively; FIG. 8B is a bar chart showing quantization effects of PBS, 1 mg/kg EGAR, 10 mg/kg EGAR and 100 mg/kg EGAR in a preclinical period of epilepsy seizure, the results show that there is a significant difference between PBS treated group and 1 mg/kg EGAR, 10 mg/kg EGAR and 100 mg/kg EGAR treated groups (**P<0.03, **P<0.01, #p<0.05, t test, n=6).

[0091] The above results show: in a behavioral experiment, EGAR can mitigate tic symptom of PTZ-inducted mouse epilepsy and extend the preclinical period of epilepsy seizure.

[0092] Finally it should be noted that: the above examples are merely illustrative of technical solutions of the present application, rather than to be limiting thereof; although the present application is described in detail with reference to foregoing examples, those skilled in the art shall understand: the technical solution described in foregoing examples can also be modified, or equivalently replaced with respect to part or all technical features therein; however, these modifications or replacements will not make essence of corresponding technical solutions depart from scope of the technical solutions of the examples of the present application.