System and Dental Implant for Reducing Losses of Dental Implants or Dental Prostheses

Abstract

The present invention relates to a system which comprises a dental implant (10) and a replacement ring (28). The dental implant (10) has an insertion portion for anchoring in a jaw bone. The replacement ring (28) serves for replacing a subtractively removable annular material region in a coronal region of the insertion portion, the shape of the replacement ring (28) being inscribable into the shape of the dental implant (10) in the coronal region at least to some extent such that an inner lateral surface (32) of the replacement ring (28) lies within the shape of the dental implant (10).

Claims

1. A system, comprising a dental implant having an insertion portion for anchoring in a jaw bone, and a replacement ring for replacing a subtractively removable annular material region in a coronal region of the insertion portion, the shape of the replacement ring being inscribable into the shape of the dental implant in the coronal region such that an inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring lies within the shape of the dental implant, wherein said dental implant has: an insertion portion which extends along an implant axis (I), and a coronal projection for receiving one or both of an abutment and a machining unit for intra-oral subtractive surface machining of the insertion portion, wherein the coronal projection extends from the insertion portion in the coronal direction and along a prosthesis axis (P), and characterized in that the prosthesis axis (P) and the implant axis (I) are inclined towards each other at an angle in the range 0<45.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the texture of the external surface of the replacement ring is the same as the texture of the dental implant surface in the coronal region.

3. The system according to claim 1, wherein the shape of the replacement ring can be inscribed into the shape of the dental implant in the coronal region such that the inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring lies within the shape of the dental implant and that the outer peripheral surface of the replacement ring lies on or outside the peripheral surface of the dental implant.

4. The system according to claim 1, wherein, in some sections, the inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring is inclined towards a central axis (M) of the replacement ring and approaches the central axis in the direction of a coronal side of the replacement ring.

5. The system according to claim 4, wherein the inclination of some sections of the inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring towards the central axis is between 0.5 and 2.5.

6. The system according to claim 1, wherein, in at least some sections, the peripheral surface of the dental implant in the coronal region is inclined towards an implant axis (I) and approaches the implant axis (I) in the direction of a coronal end of the insertion portion.

7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the inclination of the peripheral surface in the coronal region in some sections is between 35 and 55.

8. The system according to claim 6, wherein the inclination of the peripheral surface of the dental implant in the coronal region in some sections is between 0 and 5.

9. The system according to claim 1, wherein, in at least some sections, the outer peripheral surface of the replacement ring is inclined towards a central axis (M) of the replacement ring and approaches the central axis in the direction of a coronal side of the replacement ring.

10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the inclination of some sections of the outer peripheral surface of the replacement ring is between 35 and 55.

11. The system according to claim 9, wherein the dental implant comprises a coronal projection, which extends from the insertion portion in the coronal direction and which is used for receiving an abutment and/or for receiving a machining unit for the intra-oral subtractive machining of the dental implant.

12. A system, comprising a dental implant having an insertion portion for anchoring in a jaw bone which extends from the insertion portion in the coronal direction and which is used for receiving an abutment and/or for receiving a machining unit for the intra-oral subtractive machining of the dental implant, and a replacement abutment, which can be mounted in a positive fitting manner onto the coronal projection, after the latter has been lengthened by subtractive removal of dental implant material, but which cannot be mounted in a positive fitting manner onto the un-lengthened coronal projection.

13. The system according to claim 12, wherein the coronal projection extends in the direction of a prosthesis axis (P), which is inclined with respect to the implant axis of the insertion portion, at an angle in the range 0<45.

14. The system according to claim 12, wherein the coronal projection and the insertion section are integrally connected.

15. The system according to claim 12, wherein the coronal projection is conical and has a cone angle of less than 11.

16. The system according to claim 12, wherein, in at least some sections, the coronal projection has a circular or elliptical cross section.

17. The system according to claim 12, wherein the dental implant has a shoulder at the coronal end of the insertion portion.

18. The system according to claim 12, wherein the replacement abutment comprises an internal thread, so that the replacement abutment can be screwed onto the dental implant using a corresponding external thread formed on the dental implant.

19. The system according to claim 12, which also comprises a device for the intra-oral subtractive machining of the inserted dental implant, said device comprising: a connection with which the device can be connected to the implant in side the oral cavity of a patient, and a subtractive machining unit, in particular a milling machine, with which dental implant material can be removed from the surface of the coronal region.

20. (canceled)

21. The system according to claim 1, wherein the coronal projection and the insertion section are integrally connected.

22. The system according to any one of claim 1, wherein the coronal projection is conical and has a cone angle of less than 11.

23. The system according to any one of claim 1, wherein, in at least some sections, the coronal projection have a circular or elliptical cross section.

24. The system according to claim 1, wherein the dental implant has a shoulder at the coronal end of the insertion portion.

25. The system according to claim 1, wherein the replacement ring or the replacement abutment comprises an internal thread so that the replacement ring or replacement abutment can be screwed onto the dental implant using a corresponding external thread formed on the dental implant.

26. A system, comprising a dental implant having an insertion portion for anchoring in a jaw bone, and a replacement ring for replacing a subtractively removable annular material region in a coronal region of the insertion portion, the shape of the replacement ring being, at least to some extent, inscribable into the shape of the dental implant in the coronal region, such that an inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring lies within the shape of the dental implant, wherein the dental implant comprises a coronal projection, which extends from the insertion portion in the coronal direction and which is used for receiving one or both of an abutment and a machining unit for the intra-oral subtractive machining of the dental implant, wherein the coronal projection and the insertion section are integrally connected.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the dental implant has a shoulder at the coronal end of the insertion portion.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0049] Additional advantages and features of the invention are obtained from the description of the following figures, in which the same parts are labelled with the same reference number.

[0050] The drawings show:

[0051] FIG. 1 a dental implant, which forms a part of a system according to the invention,

[0052] FIG. 2 a system according to the invention in accordance with a first embodiment,

[0053] FIG. 3 a replacement ring which is used in the system according to the invention of

[0054] FIG. 2, in a sectional view (top) and in plan view (bottom),

[0055] FIG. 4 a section through a replacement ring of a system according to the invention in accordance with a second embodiment,

[0056] FIG. 5 a section through a replacement ring of a system according to the invention in accordance with a third embodiment,

[0057] FIG. 6 an implant for an external implant-abutment connection (FIG. 6a) and an implant for an internal implant-abutment connection (FIG. 6b), and

[0058] FIG. 7 a dental implant according to the invention, in which the prosthesis axis and the implant axis are inclined towards each other.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

[0059] FIG. 1 shows a dental implant 10 that is suitable for use in a system according to the invention and is attached to an abutment 12 using a screw 14. The dental implant 10 comprises an insertion portion 16, which in turn comprises a coronal region 18 and an apical region 20. At the coronal end of the insertion portion 16 a shoulder 22 is located, from which an external cone 24 extends in the coronal direction along a prosthesis axis P. In the implant 10 of FIG. 1 the prosthesis axis P coincides with an implant axis I, which runs along the insertion portion 16 through the centre thereof. Recesses 26 are provided on the side of the external cone 24, which are used to secure a rotational position of the abutment 12.

[0060] When providing a patient with the implant 10, the insertion portion 16 is inserted into the jaw bone of the patient, wherein the insertion portion 16 is screwed into the bone by means of a thread (not shown). As shown in FIG. 1, the apical region 20 can taper in the apical direction (downwards in FIG. 1). As can be seen from FIG. 1, in the coronal region 18 the outer peripheral surface 26 of the dental implant 10 is inclined with respect to the implant axis I by the angle , so that the coronal region 18 tapers in the coronal direction (upwards in FIG. 1). This tapering in the coronal direction allows the apposition of a thicker layer of bone onto the implant at the coronal end of the insertion portion 16, which enables the incidence of peri-implantitis to be avoided. By way of deviation from the not true-to-scale drawing of FIG. 1, the angle can have a value of 45, which facilitates a particularly good bone augmentation. It is explained below that in some sections an angle of =1.5 can also be advantageous.

[0061] The cone angle in a preferred embodiment is 8. This means that the tapering connection between the correspondingly shaped abutment 12 and the external cone 24 is self-locking, i.e. on account of a frictional connection is secured against twisting, and to a certain extent against being pulled apart. Such a tapered connection with a cone angle of less than 11 is self-locking and also bacteria-proof, so that the risk of bacteria accumulation between the abutment 12 and the implant 10 is low.

[0062] Preferably, the external cone 24 has a circular cross-section in a cut perpendicular to the prosthesis axis P. In contrast to a cross-section with a hexagonal profile or polygonal profile, the circular cross section avoids any play, for example when a rotational force acts on the abutment 12. This allows the anti-bacterial quality of the implant-abutment connection to be further improved and also prevents the screw 14 from becoming loose over time.

[0063] The shoulder 22 offers the advantage that, on the one hand enough space is available laterally, that is to say perpendicular to the implant axis I, to remove material from the implant 10 in the coronal region 18 and thus at the same time to remove a contaminated surface in the coronal region 18. On the other hand, due to the shoulder 22 a space exists between the apical end of the abutment 12 and the surrounding bone, which is adsorbed at the side of the peripheral surface of the implant 26. Due to this offset (so-called platform switching), the risk of peri-implantitis can be further reduced, because due to the shoulder 22 any bacterial colonization occurring in the implant-abutment connection does not directly adjoin the surrounding bone tissue and the treated implant surface for bone apposition.

[0064] In a preferred embodiment, the external cone 24 has a length of between 1.5 mm and 3.5 mm, for example 2.5 mm, the coronal region 18 has an extension of between 2 mm and 4 mm, for example, 3 mm, in the direction of the implant axis I and the external cone 24 has a diameter between 1.7 mm and 3.7 mm, for example, 2.7 mm, at the apical end at the level of the shoulder 22. The width B of the shoulder is 22 in a preferred embodiment is between 0.2 mm and 2 mm, for example, 1.5 mm.

[0065] In all embodiments according to the invention the implant 10 and/or the replacement ring 28 can be made of titanium.

[0066] FIG. 2 shows a system according to the invention in accordance with a first embodiment with the implant 10 of FIG. 1 and a replacement ring 28. FIG. 2 shows a longitudinal section through the replacement ring 28 along a central axis M of the replacement ring. From FIG. 2 it can be seen that both the outer peripheral surface 30 of the replacement ring 28 and the inner peripheral surface 32 of the of the replacement ring 28 are inclined with respect to the central axis M, namely at an angle or . This reduces both the outer and the inner diameter of the replacement ring 28 in the direction of a coronal side 34 of the replacement ring 28, which is located opposite to an apical side 36 of the replacement ring 28.

[0067] In the embodiment of FIG. 2 the region of material of the implant 10 to be replaced is shown hatched. It is important to note that, as in FIG. 1, the representation of the implant 10 in FIG. 2 is a longitudinal section through the implant along the implant axis I. The implant 10 can be rotationally symmetrical or substantially rotationally symmetrical about the implant axis I and the prosthesis axis P. A coronal region 18 which is rotationally symmetrical about the prosthesis axis P, offers the advantage that it can be easily milled using a milling cutter that rotates about the prosthesis axis P.

[0068] After the subtractive machining of the dental implant 10 the outer peripheral surface 38 of the dental implant 10 in the coronal region 18 preferably has a shape or contour that conforms to the inner peripheral surface 32 of the associated replacement ring 38. This makes it possible with the preferred inclination of the peripheral surfaces 38 and 32 with respect to the implant axis I, or to the central axis M, to mount the replacement ring 28 on to the subtractively machined implant 10 in the coronal to apical direction. With an angle of 1.5 between the peripheral surfaces 38, 32 and the respective axes I, M, the connection between the subtractively machined implant and the mounted replacement ring 28 can be force-fitting or friction-fitting, in such a way that an additional screw connection is not required.

[0069] The shape and the contour of the outer peripheral surface 30 of the replacement ring can conform to the shape and the contour of the peripheral surface 26 of the unmachined implant 10, but this is not absolutely required.

[0070] In order to restore the condition of the bacteria-free, unmachined implant 10 after the insertion, the replacement ring 28 preferably has an outer surface whose structure and texture correspond to that of the original implant surface.

[0071] At the top of FIG. 3 the replacement ring 28 of the system of FIG. 2 is again represented as a longitudinal section along the central axis M. At the bottom of FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, a plan view of the replacement ring 28 is shown along the central axis M. Even if in the embodiment of FIG. 3 the cross-sections through the peripheral lines 32 and 30 of the replacement ring 28 are both circular, it is important to note that the cross-sectional lines through the peripheral surfaces 32 and 30 can also have other closed curves, for example that of a polygonal or hexagonal profile, or other non-symmetrical curves. The same is true for the implant, which does not necessarily have to be rotationally symmetrical.

[0072] FIGS. 4 and 5 show replacement rings 328 and 428, which each belong to a system according to the invention of a second embodiment and a third embodiment. In the replacement ring 328 of FIG. 4 the outer peripheral surface 30 is inclined by 45 with respect to the central axis M, to enable good bone apposition and to prevent peri-implantitis. The inner peripheral surface of the 32, in a coronal and in an apical region (respectively above and below the dashed lines), is also inclined by 45 and thus parallel to the outer peripheral surface 30. In an intermediate region the inner peripheral surface 32 is inclined by 1.5 with respect to the central axis M to facilitate a force-fitting connection, which does not require a screw connection, between the correspondingly subtractively machined implant 10 and the replacement ring 328.

[0073] In the replacement ring 428 of FIG. 5 the profile of the inner peripheral surface 32 conforms to the profile of the inner peripheral surface 32 of the replacement ring 328 of FIG. 4. The profile of the outer peripheral surface 30 of the replacement ring 428 of FIG. 5 is parallel to the profile of the inner peripheral surface 32 of the same replacement ring. As a result, the thickness D of the replacement ring 428 is constant in the direction of the central axis M. If the profile of the peripheral surface 26 of the implant 10 corresponds to the profile of the peripheral surface 30 of the replacement ring 428, then the material removal can be effected uniformly along the implant axis I, i.e. the thickness of the material region removed is constant in the direction of the implant axis I.

[0074] In FIG. 6 the implant 10 of FIGS. 1 and 2, which has an external cone 24, is compared with an implant 110, which has an internal cone 40 for an internal tapered connection.

[0075] Compared to an internal tapered connection, an external tapered connection with the cone 24 offers the advantage that the implant 10 can be made more solid and stable than the implant 110. Because of the solid design of the implant 10, tensions can be avoided during the fitting of a prosthesis tooth, in particular in the coronal region 18 of the insertion portion 16, which can reduce the stress on the surrounding tissue. The risk of an incidence of peri-implantitis and a resulting loss of the implant can therefore be reduced by means of the external cone 24. In addition, with the more solid implant 10 the risk of an implant fracture is also lower. There is also more material available for a subtractive removal, in which there is no risk that a critical wall thickness of the implant will be undershot.

[0076] Even if the implant 10 of FIG. 6a is preferred over the implant 110 of FIG. 6b for use within a system according to the invention, it should be noted that the implant 110 can also be part of a system according to the invention.

[0077] FIG. 7 shows a dental implant 210 according to the invention, having an external cone 124 which extends along a prosthesis axis P that is inclined at an angle with respect to the implant axis I. The angle has a value in the range 0<45. When fitting a dental prosthesis it often happens that the prosthesis axis P, which extends through the centre of the dental prosthesis and along which the screw connection of the dental prosthesis is made, does not coincide with the implant axis I.

[0078] In the prior art therefore, angled abutments or adapter fittings are generally used, for example when fitting an implant 110, as shown in FIG. 6b. In a first step the abutment or the adapter piece is screwed together with the inserted implant in the direction of the implant axis I. In a second step the dental prosthesis is screwed along the prosthesis axis P which is inclined with respect to the implant axis I.

[0079] The implant 210 of FIG. 7 offers the advantage that only one screwing operation is required, namely along the prosthesis axis P, and the second connection between the implant and the abutment or the connection part can be dispensed with, even if the prosthesis axis P and the implant axis I are divergent. This makes it possible to form the dental prosthesis directly on the abutment and to cement it on the abutment even before the treatment session. This unit consisting of the dental prosthesis and abutment can then be mounted on the inserted implant 210 with only one screwing operation, without a cementing operation or other connection having to be carried out in the oral cavity of the patient, and thus reducing the risk of peri-implantitis and loss of the dental prosthesis and implant.

[0080] Since the dental implant 210 of FIG. 7 is solid in the same way as the dental implant 10, it has the same corresponding advantages as were described earlier in relation to FIG. 6a, thus further reducing the number of implant losses and the losses of implant-borne dental prostheses. The dental implant 210 can also be made from titanium, as is the dental implant 10.

[0081] It should be pointed out that the embodiments described above are purely examples of the present invention, which is not limited thereto. The previously described features can be meaningful in any combination. The scope of the present invention is derived solely from the claims.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

[0082] 10, 110, 210 dental implant [0083] 12 abutment [0084] 14 screw [0085] 16 insertion portion [0086] 18 coronal region [0087] 20 apical region [0088] 22 shoulder [0089] 24, 124 external cone [0090] 26 peripheral surface of the implant. [0091] 28, 328, 428 replacement ring [0092] 30 outer peripheral surface of the replacement ring [0093] 32 inner peripheral surface of the replacement ring [0094] 34 coronal side [0095] 36 apical side [0096] 38 peripheral surface of the implant after subtractive machining step [0097] 40 internal cone [0098] P prosthesis axis [0099] I implant axis [0100] M central axis