SOUND ABSORBING PANEL WITH WEDGE-SHAPED CROSS-SECTION MICRO-SLITS

Abstract

An acoustical panel has a multiplicity of short micro-slits, about 10 mm in length each, with each micro-slit having a wedge shaped cross-section in which the opening on the front side of the panel is wider than the opening on the rear side of the panel by a factor of about 2 to effectively absorb sound frequencies in the range of 250-2000 Hz, with the micro-slits greater than 4%. The micro-slits are spaced apart less than 5 mm and several different patterns of micro-slits may be employed including micro-slits that are straight as well as arcuate or some combination of straight and arcuate. The area of the micro-slits on the front surface of the panel exceeds 4%.

Claims

1. A sound absorbing panel comprising: a) a panel having a front surface and a back surface; b) a multiplicity of micro-slits formed in said panel and extending from said front surface to said back surface, each micro-slit having an entrance at said front surface and an exit at said back surface; c) each of said micro-slits having a direction of elongation and a wedge-shaped cross-section perpendicular to said direction of elongation, each micro-slit having a substantially uniform first width at said front surface entrance and a substantially uniform second width at said back surface exit, said second width at said back surface being greater than said first width at said front surface; and d) a surface area subtended by all of said micro-slits at said front surface combined being at least 4% of a surface area of said front surface; e) whereby sound enters said micro-slits at each entrance and exits said micro-slits at each exit, said sound being absorbed at a frequency range of 250-2000 Hz.

2. The panel of claim 1, wherein said panel is transparent.

3. The panel of claim 1, wherein said panel is rectangular.

4. The panel of claim 1, wherein said first width is about 0.25 mm0.05 mm.

5. The panel of claim 4, wherein said second width is about 0.5 mm0.1

6. The panel of claim 5, wherein a ratio between said second width and said first width is about 2:110%.

7. The panel of claim 1, wherein said panel exhibits optimal sound absorption at a frequency range of about 600-900 Hz.

8. (canceled)

9. The panel of claim 1, wherein each micro-slit has a length of about 10 mm.

10. The panel of claim 9, wherein a ratio between length and width at front surface for each micro-slit is about 40.

11. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a RAIN pattern.

12. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a WAVE pattern.

13. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a FLOW pattern.

14. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a THISTLE pattern.

15. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a CLOVER pattern.

16. The panel of claim 1, wherein said micro-slits form a PARQUET pattern.

17. A sound absorbing panel comprising: a) a transparent panel having a front surface and a back surface; b) a multiplicity of micro-slits formed in said panel and extending from said front surface to said back surface, each micro-slit having an entrance at said front surface and an exit at said back surface; c) each of said micro-slits having a direction of elongation and a wedge-shaped cross-section perpendicular to said direction of elongation, each micro-slit having a substantially uniform first width of about 0.25 mm0.05 mm at said front surface entrance and a substantially uniform second width of about 0.5 mm0.1 mm at said back surface exit, said second width at said back surface being greater than said first width at said front surface at a ratio of about 2:110%; and d) a surface area subtended by all of said micro-slits at said front surface combined being at least 4% of a surface arca of said front surface; e) whereby sound enters said micro-slits at each entrance and exits said micro-slits at each exit, said sound being absorbed at a frequency range of 250-2000 Hz.

18. The panel of claim 17, wherein said panel is rectangular.

19. The panel of claim 17, wherein said panel exhibits optimal sound absorption at a frequency range of about 600-900 Hz and sound absorption at a frequency range of

20. The panel of claim 17, wherein each micro-slit has a length of about 10 mm and a ratio between length and width at front surface for each micro-slit is about 40.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] FIG. 1 shows a view of an example of a front surface of a panel made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.

[0022] FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view along the line 2-2 of FIG. 1.

[0023] FIGS. 3-8 show front views of panels bearing a variety of micro-slits of differing shapes and configurations.

[0024] FIG. 9 shows a graph comparing the sound absorbing performance of the present invention as compared to the invention disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,359 to Vigran et al.

SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0025] Reference is first made to FIG. 1 which shows a rectangular panel 10 having a front surface 11 and a peripheral edge 13. The surface 11 of the panel 10 exhibits a multiplicity of micro-slits 15. The pattern of micro-slits in FIG. 1 is generally the same as that which is depicted in FIG. 5 described by the name FLOW. As is clear in FIG. 1, the micro-slits are generally arcuate shaped in that embodiment of the present invention.

[0026] With reference to FIG. 2, the panel 10 has the front surface 11 as well as a back or rear surface 12. FIG. 2 is a cross-section through several ones of the micro-slits 15. As seen, the cross-section of the micro-slits is wedge-shaped with the width being smaller at the front surface 11 of the panel 10 than the width at the back surface 12 of the panel 10. This cross-section is maintained substantially consistent throughout the length of each micro-slit.

[0027] In the example shown in FIG. 2, the width of the micro-slits at the front surface 11 of the panel 10 is about 0.25 mm or 0.01. At the back surface 12 of the panel 10, the width of the micro-slits is about 0.5 mm or 0.02. Thus, the ratio between the width of the micro-slits at the front surface of the panel and the width at the back or rear surface of the panel is approximately 1:2 or double the width at the back or rear surface of the panel as compared to at the front surface of the panel. Of course, the width at the front of the panel has a tolerance of 0.05 mm and at the back or rear of the panel of 0.1 mm. The ratio between the width at the front and back or rear is preferably 0.50.1.

[0028] Moreover, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the spacing between adjacent micro-slits is preferably less than 5 min. Additionally, the preferred micro-slit length is about 10 mm so that the ratio between the length of the micro-slit and its width at the front surface of the panel is preferably less than 50, preferably about 40.

[0029] Moreover, in the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the open area on the front surface 11 of the panel 10 formed by micro-slits is preferably greater than 4%. Through experimentation, Applicants have found, unexpectedly, that when the above-described dimensions of the micro-slits, including their wedge-shaped cross-section, their spacing apart, and the total open area subtended by all of the micro-slits combined is greater than 4%, the panel 10 effectively absorbs sound within the range of 250-2000 Hz with a focus on the sound octave encompassing around 1000 Hz.

[0030] With reference to FIG. 9, a graph is provided that compares the normal incidence absorption coefficient versus frequency for the present invention as compared to the invention disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,359. As clearly seen in the graph, the peak absorption coefficient for the present invention is approximately one octave higher than that of the device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,359. As shown, the peak absorption coefficient for the prior art device falls within the range of 300-450 Hz, whereas in the present invention, the peak falls within the range of 600-900 Hz.

[0031] With reference to FIGS. 3-8, it is seen that the micro-slits of the present invention may be formed in a variety of patterns, even over and above those shown in FIGS. 3-8, so long as the criteria are maintained that the area subtended by the openings on the front surface of the panel exceeds 4% of the total area and details of the wedge-shaped cross-section, width to length ratio, and slit spacing are as disclosed herein. Thus, FIG. 3 shows a pattern described as RAIN. FIG. 4 shows a pattern described as WAVE. FIG. 5 shows a pattern described as FLOW and corresponds to the view of FIG. 1. FIG. 6 shows a pattern described as THISTLE. FIG. 7 shows a pattern described as COVER. FIG. 8 shows a pattern described as PARQUET and resembles a parquet floor with orthogonally disposed micro-slits. Each figure displays a number percent under the figure. Those numbers correspond to the percentage of open area subtended by the micro-slits in each respective figure. As is seen, in each case, the figure is greater than 4%.

[0032] If desired, the inventive panels may be installed, for example, in a ceiling of a room or space with a cavity located behind each panel. However, in light of the teachings of the present invention, it is not required to provide any sound absorbing material adjacent the back surface 12 of each panel. The panel 10 may be transparent for clear vision through it or translucent for lighting effects, as desired. In the preferred embodiments, the panel thickness can range from about (about 3 mm) to about (about 12-13 mm).

[0033] Comparing the present invention with the invention disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,359 to Vigran et al., Vigran et al. have a target frequency of sound absorption in the range of 100-200 Hz, a low frequency indeed. By contrast, where micro-slits are provided in panels in accordance with the teachings of the present invention, the target frequency is in the range of 250-2000 Hz to provide enhanced general noise control over a wider frequency range focusing on the octave around 1000 Hz. While the present invention is not intended to provide enhanced sound absorption at a low frequency range such as the 100-200 Hz range of the Vigran et al. invention, the much wider range of sound absorption exhibited by the present invention is believed a dramatic improvement over Vigran et al. and the other prior art known to Applicants.

[0034] As such, an invention has been disclosed in terms of preferred embodiments thereof which fulfill each and every one of the objects of the invention as set forth hereinabove, and provide a new and useful sound absorbing panel with wedge-shaped cross-section micro-slits of great novelty and utility.

[0035] Of course, various changes, modifications and alterations in the teachings of the present invention may be contemplated by those skilled in the art without departing from the intended spirit and scope thereof.

[0036] As such, it is intended that the present invention only be limited by the terms of the appended claims.