Compositions for and methods of identifying antigens

Abstract

Replicable libraries having discrete members in defined locations for screening for antigens to a pathogenic organism are provided. Also provided are methods for using such libraries as well as a specific antigen, CT788, which induces T-cell activation during a Chlamydia infection.

Claims

1. A method of determining whether a member of a library contains or encodes an immunogenic polypeptide, wherein said library comprises at least 20 discrete members in defined locations and said members each comprise a cell or virus comprising a pre-determined open reading frame of a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide, or a portion thereof, differentially expressed in a neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell, said pre-predetermined open reading frame operably linked to a promoter, said method comprising: (a) individually contacting a member of said library with a second cell capable of (i) endocytosing said cell or said virus and (ii) displaying a polypeptide encoded by said pre-determined open reading frame on its surface through the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I pathway; (b) individually contacting said second cell from step (a) with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) cell derived from a mammal having, or having previously had, a neoplasm; and (c) detecting whether said CTL cell is activated, wherein activation of said CTL cell indicates that said member of said library contains said pre-determined open reading frame which encodes at least a portion of said immunogenic polypeptide.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said member of said library further comprises a polynucleotide encoding a pore-forming protein.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein said pore-forming protein is listeriolysin O (LLO).

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said second cell is a macrophage.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said member of said library is killed prior to said contacting step (a).

6. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to said contacting step (b), said second cell is killed.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein, prior to said contacting step (a), a replica of said library is made.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising step: (d) recovering said polypeptide identified in step (c) from a replica copy of said library.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising step: (d) identifying an epitope sufficient for CTL activation within said polypeptide determined to be immunogenic in step (c).

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said members of said library comprise polynucleotides encoding at least 80% of the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said members of said library comprise polynucleotides encoding at least 90% of the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said members of said library comprise polynucleotides encoding at least 95% of the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein said contacting step (b) is performed using a plurality of CTL cells.

14. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing steps (b) and (c) at least one further time using said library.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein a different CTL cell is contacted in step (b) each time said method is performed.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein said pre-determined open reading frames include an N-terminal and a C-terminal tag.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein said library includes at least 10% of the open reading frames present in the polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein said library includes at least 20% of the open reading frames present in the polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein said library includes at least 50% of the open reading frames present in the polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell as compared to the corresponding normal cell.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein said portion of said polypeptide has at least 95% sequence identity to the corresponding portion of the polypeptide differentially expression in said neoplastic cell.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein said portion of said polypeptide has at least 99% sequence identity to the corresponding portion of the polypeptide differentially expression in said neoplastic cell.

22. The method of claim 1, wherein each member of said library comprises a single polynucleotide differentially expressed in said neoplastic cell.

23. The method of claim 1, wherein the expression of said polypeptide in the neoplastic cell is at least 10% more than the expression of the polypeptide in the corresponding normal cell.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein the expression of said polypeptide in the neoplastic cell is at least 25% more than the expression of the polypeptide in the corresponding normal cell.

25. The method of claim 1, wherein the expression of said polypeptide in the neoplastic cell is at least 50% more than the expression of the polypeptide in the corresponding normal cell.

26. The method of claim 1, wherein the neoplastic cell is a cancer cell.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the cancer cell is a breast cancer cell.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing conventional MHC class I antigen presentation.

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing stimulation of CD8.sup.+ effector T-cell responses during Listeria monocytogenes infection.

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing listeriolysin O (LLO)-mediated escape of L. monocytogenes from a vacuole during infection.

(4) FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing LLO-mediated delivery of a polypeptide expressed in E. coli to the cytosol of a cell capable of endocytosing a bacterium.

(5) FIG. 5 is a set of images showing delivery of E. coli expressing GFP and LLO to the cytoplasm of a cell.

(6) FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing E. coli/LLO-mediated delivery of antigens to the MHC class I pathway.

(7) FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the modified Gateway system used in cloning of the C. trachomatis library.

(8) FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing the expression cloning strategy for identification of antigens for any pathogen of interest.

(9) FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of the validation strategy of the library employed using B3Z T-cells, which recognize the SIINFEKL tag (SEQ ID NO:155) present on the expressed proteins using the modified Gateway vector described herein.

(10) FIG. 10 is an image showing that library validation strategy works as theorized by successfully determining which proteins in the library were expressed.

(11) FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram showing a strategy for screening for breast cancer antigens.

(12) FIG. 12 is an image showing a positive result from screening of the C. trachomatis library using a Chlamydia specific T-cell line.

(13) FIG. 13A is a graph showing the results of CD4 and IFN? expression from flow cytometry using a CD4.sup.+ T-cell clone being mixed with either uninfected or Chlamydia-infected BMM cells. Results are gated on live cells.

(14) FIG. 13B is a graph showing the number of Chlamydia IFUs detected 72 hours after infection. Both previously infected (immune) mice and naive mice with the CD4.sup.+ T-cell clone identified herein show low levels of infection as compared to naive mice without the CD4.sup.+ T-cell clone.

(15) FIG. 14 is the peptide sequence of the CT788 (Cta1) protein (SEQ ID NO:1) and CT788.sub.133-152 (Cta1.sub.133-152) (SEQ ID NO:2).

(16) FIG. 15 is an image showing clones of E. coli expressing individual C. trachomatis ORFs cultured with BMMs and then incubated with the T cell clone NR9.2. This figure shows a plate where supernatant from the corresponding assay wells was tested for IFN? in an ELISA assay. E. coli expressing Cta1 (encoded by ORF CT788) induced NR9.2 to secrete high levels of IFN? (>370 ng/ml) whereas E. coli expressing other Chlamydia proteins in the library induced only background levels of IFN? secretion (<26 ng/ml). The well indicated as Cta1 and ELISA Standards are yellow; other wells are colorless. The colorimetric intensity of the wells shown in the figure that do not correspond to Cta1 or the standards are typical of results seen with all the other E. coli clones in the library. ELISA standards corresponding to high amounts of IFN? are indicated.

(17) FIG. 16A is a plot showing CD4.sup.+ peripheral blood lymphocytes from non-transgenic and NR1 transgenic mice stained for the V?2 and V?8.3 TCR elements expressed by T cell clone NR9.2. Results are gated on live CD4.sup.+ cells.

(18) FIG. 16B is a graph showing proliferation of splenocytes from NR1 transgenic or non-transgenic mice in response to the indicated concentrations of Cta1.sub.133-152 (SEQ ID NO:2). Proliferation was measured by [.sup.3H]thymidine incorporation into cells. These results indicate that NR1 TCR tg cells recognize Cta1.sub.133-152 (SEQ ID NO:2).

(19) FIG. 17 is a graph showing that the CD4.sup.+ T-cell clone (NR9.2) injected into naive mice proliferates following infection by Chlamydia. Proliferation of the CFSE-labeled TCR transgenic T-cells is observed as a shift in the transferred population to the left into an arbitrarily set gate. CFSE-labeled NR1 or OTII cells were transferred into C57BL/6 recipients. One day later, mice were infected intravenously with the indicated pathogen. Spleens were harvested three days later. Results were gated on live CD4.sup.+ V?2.sup.+ cells to detect the NR1 TCR tg cells.

(20) FIG. 18A is a set of plots showing CD69 and CD44 are upregulated and CD62L is downregulated on proliferating transgenic T cells in the draining lymph nodes. Proliferation (reflected as a shift in the population to the left) of CFSE-labeled CD4.sup.+ TCR transgenic cells transferred into naive mice was measured 5-7 days after infection of the recipient mice with C. trachomatis serovar L2. CD69 was upregulated on proliferating cells as reflected in a population shift from the bottom of the graph to the top. CD62L was downregulated on proliferating cells as reflected in a population shift from the top of the graph to the bottom. Results are gated on live Thy1.2.sup.+CD4.sup.+ cells.

(21) FIG. 18B is a pair of graphs showing transferred TCR transgenic cells begin proliferating extensively at four days post-infection in the lymph nodes draining the genital tract, but not in lymph notes draining other sites. Dotted line represents uninfected mice; the solid line represents infected mice. Results are gated on live Thy1.2.sup.+(CD90.2).sup.+CD4.sup.+ cells.

(22) FIG. 18C is a set of plots showing transferred TCR transgenic T cells are recruited to the genital tracts of mice following intrauterine infection with Chlamydia. CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 recipients and then mock-infected or infected in the uterus with 106 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. Seven days after infection, the genital tracts were removed from the mice and analyzed for the presence of the transferred NR1 cells. The presence of CD90.2.sup.+ CD4.sup.+ NR1 cells was compared in the genital tracts of mock infected and infected recipients. Results were gated on live cells. The box shows adoptively transferred T cells in the genital tissue of mice.

(23) FIG. 19 is a set of graphs showing that NR1 cells proliferate preferentially in the ILNs following intrauterine infection with C. trachomatis. CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 recipients, which were then mock infected or infected in the uterus with 10.sup.6 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. ILNs and NDLNs were harvested at the indicated times post-infection and proliferation of CD4.sup.+ NR1 cells was examined. Results were gated on live CD90.2.sup.+ CD4.sup.+ V?2.sup.+ cells to specifically detect the NR1 TCR tg cells.

(24) FIG. 20 is a set of graphs showing that NR1 cells differentiate into Th1 cells. CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 recipients which were then infected in the uterus with 10.sup.6 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. Six days later, cells from the ILNs were stimulated with PMA/ionomycin and examined for intracellular IFN? by flow cytometry. Cta1-specific T cells (CD90.2.sup.+CD4.sup.+) were gated on CFSE.sup.lo and CFSE.sup.hi cells, and intracellular IFN? levels in these two populations were compared. Solid lines represent isotype control; gray filled histograms indicate IFN?.

(25) FIG. 21A is a set of graphs showing the levels of CD62L, CD44, and CFSE on NR1 cells in the genital tracts of mock infected and infected mice. Results were gated on live CD90.2.sup.+ CD4.sup.+ cells to specifically detect the NR1 TCR tg cells.

(26) FIG. 21B is a graph showing NR1 cells from the genital tract stimulated with PMA/ionomycin and analyzed by flow cytometry to detect production of IFN?. Results are gated on live CD90.2.sup.+ CD4.sup.+ cells to detect the NR1 TCR tg cells specifically. The solid line represents the isotype control; the filled histogram represents IFN?.

(27) FIG. 22 is a graph showing T cell clone NR9.2 recognizes the novel T cell antigen Cta1.sub.133-152 (SEQ ID NO:2). The antigenic peptide from Cta1 was mapped by testing overlapping 20-mer synthetic peptides for their ability to stimulate NR9.2 to secrete IFN?. Only Cta1.sub.133-152 stimulated NR9.2 to secrete significant levels of IFN? in an IFN? ELISA. Shown below is the protein sequence of Cta1 (SEQ ID NO:1) with Cta1.sub.133-152 (SEQ ID NO:2) underlined.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(28) In one aspect, the invention permits in vitro screening of proven human immunity effectors to identify their key target antigens from the complete proteome, or a portion thereof, from any disease-causing agent and from differentially expressed polypeptides in neoplastic cells. In another aspect, the invention provides compositions, including purified proteins and vaccines, and methods of treating or preventing a Chlamydia infection involving use of the CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof as an antigen.

(29) The technology of the first aspect of the invention enables a researcher to predict which epitope cocktail will prove effective in vivo, either as a prophylactic or a therapeutic vaccine. Importantly, it mimics the mammalian immune system in vitro and presents it with every antigen that a given disease-causing agent might express in the infected host. Within a matter of a few days, it is possible to identify, from the entire proteome of a disease-causing agent, or portion thereof, the specific antigens that will stimulate the immune system most effectively in vivo, a task that previously was impossible.

(30) At the core of the invention is the ability to rapidly identify antigens that result in the in vivo stimulation of protective cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, allowing identified immune targets to be incorporated immediately into existing antigen delivery systems to produce multivalent vaccine formulations with the highest probability of generating protective cell-mediated immunity.

(31) One of the key components of a protective cell-mediated immune response are CD8.sup.+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs), which can recognize and eliminate pathogen-infected host cells, preventing dissemination of the pathogen within the host. The generation of CTLs during a natural infection often requires the production of pathogen-specific antigenic proteins within the cytosol of host cells. During intracellular infection, antigenic proteins present within the host cell cytosol are proteolytically degraded into peptides. These peptides are subsequently displayed on the surface of host cells in association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (FIGS. 1 and 2). Peptide/MHC complexes on the surface of host cells are recognized by CTLs, leading to CTL-mediated killing of infected host cells and the development of protective T-cell memory. However, relatively few advances have been made in developing strategies to identify pathogen-specific antigens efficiently that are used as targets for the MHC class I pathway. Such targets are the frontline materials for incorporation into component vaccines to stimulate protective CTL memory and prevent infection by an invading microorganism. The development of effective methods to identify pathogen-specific antigenic proteins and target them to the MHC class I presentation pathway is therefore of fundamental importance in the rational design of vaccines against intracellular pathogens. While several current vaccine strategies are in development for in vivo antigen delivery, prior to the present invention, no strategy existed for the rapid determination of the entire antigenic profile of an infectious disease pathogen to determine the most appropriate antigenic determinants to include in a vaccine formulation.

(32) The present invention allows for the efficient in vitro expression of the entire protein complement of an infectious pathogen coupled with targeting of the expressed proteins to host antigen-presenting cells (APC) for the generation of CTL responses. Antigens delivered to host cells through this targeted expression system are processed by the MHC class I pathway (FIG. 1) for presentation to CTLs. Candidate vaccine antigens are identified in this manner through the use of pathogen-specific CTL lines that have been generated from previously infected individuals.

(33) As outlined below, the present invention has been applied to Chlamydia trachomatis, an intracellular bacterial pathogen and the most common sexually transmitted disease agent in the United States. C. trachomatis is also the leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide, and no vaccine is currently available. C. trachomatis-specific CTL lines that provide protective immunity in adoptive transfer studies were obtained from a mouse model and used to identify CTL-eliciting antigens. One antigen that corresponds to a unique member of the 894 possible C. trachomatis open reading frames, was identified from each CTL line screened against a C. trachomatis expression library. The identified antigens stimulate protective CTLs during C. trachomatis infection. Methods for producing libraries of the invention and performing the screening assays are described herein.

(34) Generation of Libraries from a Pathogenic Organism

(35) To generate a library of the invention, open reading frames or portions thereof from the genome of a pathogenic organism (e.g., a virus or a bacterium) are cloned into vectors capable of being expressed (e.g., operably linked to a promoter) in the cell or virus of which the members of the library include. This may be accomplished by any means known in the art. In one embodiment, PCR primers are designed to amplify open reading frames identified in the genome of a pathogenic organism. Sets of primers may be designed to amplify 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, 99%, or even 100% of the open reading frames, or portions thereof, from the genome of the pathogenic organism. Primer design may be performed using a computer program, for example, the GAP (Genome-wide Automated Primer finder server) computer program, available from the University of California at Irvine, which allows rapid design of primers targeting large numbers of open reading frames from the genome of a pathogen. In one embodiment, primers are designed such that secretion signal sequences from the proteins of the pathogenic organism are removed. Pathogenic bacteria and viruses whose genomes have been sequenced or are being sequenced may be found, for example, at the Genome Online Database (GOLD) (Liolios K et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Database issue):D332-334, 2006). Pathogenic organisms (e.g., bacterial pathogens) whose genomes are fully sequenced are particularly useful in the present invention.

(36) Alternatively, reverse transcription of mRNA may be used to generate a library of the invention. Reverse transcriptase in conjunction with a primer targeted to a specific mRNA sequence may be used to transcribe into a DNA sequence the coding region, or portion thereof, contained within the mRNA. Subsequent amplification by PCR (e.g., as described herein) may be used to generate sufficient quantities of DNA for the cloning the desired polynucleotide in to an expression vector.

(37) To generate the discrete members of the library, each PCR reaction containing primers specific to an open reading frame or portion thereof may be carried out in a separate reaction volume (e.g., in an 96 well plate). In one embodiment, a two step PCR process is used. The first set of primers is used to amplify the desired open reading frames, and a second set of primers is used to append additional sequences onto the amplified sequences for cloning. Such additional sequences may include sites for restriction enzymes or recombination sequences for cloning (e.g., the Gateway system from Invitrogen or the MAGIC system (Li et al. Nat. Genet. 7(3):311-9, 2005)), or any sequence tag known in the art (e.g., a His.sub.6 tag, a myc tag, or a SIINFEKL epitope (SEQ ID NO:155)). The PCR products are introduced into the cloning vectors as appropriate for the system used, as is known in the art. If a cloning vector lacks a promoter capable of driving expression in the cell or virus of the library, it will be subsequently necessary to clone the ORF or fragment thereof into a vector containing a promoter. During any of the clone steps, peptide tags, such as those described herein, may be added to either the N-terminus or C-terminus of the polypeptides clones, or portions thereof.

(38) Once the polynucleotide encoding at least portions of the polypeptides are cloned into vectors capable of expression, they may each be introduced in to an appropriate host cell or virus, thereby forming a library of the invention. The methods described herein have been used to create a library expressing 888 of the 894 polypeptides found in the C. trachomatis genome.

(39) Pathogenic organisms useful in the invention include, for example, adenovirus, Ascaris lumbricoides, astrovirus, Bacteroides spp., beta-hemolytic streptococci, BK virus, Blastocystis hominis, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Bordetella pertussis, Bunyavirus, Campylobacter fecalis, Candida spp., Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia trachomatis, Clonorchis sinensis, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium spp., Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Coccidoides immitis, Cornybacterium diphtheriae, Cornybacterium spp., coronavirus, coxsakievirus A, coxsakievirus B, Cryptococcus neoformans, cryptosporidium, cytomegalovirus, echovirus, Entamoeba histolytica, Enterbater spp., Enterobius vermicularis, Enterococcus spp., Epstein-Barr virus, equine encephalitis virus, Escherichia coli, Escherichia spp., fungi, Giardia lamblia, Haemophilus influenzae, hepatitis virus, hepatitis C virus, herpes simplex virus, Histoplasma capsulatum, HIV, Hymenolepis nana, influenza virus, JC virus, Klebsiella spp., Legionella spp., Leishmania donovani, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, microfilariae, microsporidium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, myxovirus, Necator americanus, Nocardia spp., Norwalk virus, Opisthorchis viverrini, parainfluenza virus, paramyxovirus, Plasmodium spp., Pneumocystis carinii, Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas spp., rabies virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, rotavirus, Salmonella, Shigella, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Strongyloides stercoralis, togavirus, Toxoplasma spp., Trichuris trichiura, Varicella-Zoster virus, vibrio cholera, Viridans streptococci, and Yersinia enterocolitica.

(40) Particularly useful the present invention are obligate intracellular pathogens. Intracellular bacteria include, for example, Anaplasma bovis, A. caudatum, A. centrale, A. marginale A. ovis, A. phagocytophila, A. platys, Bartonella bacilliformis, B. clarridgeiae, B. elizabethae, B. henselae, B. henselae phage, B. quintana, B. taylorii, B. vinsonii, Borrelia afzelii, B. andersonii, B. anserina, B. bissettii, B. burgdorferi, B. crocidurae, B. garinii, B. hermsii, B. japonica, B. miyamotoi, B. parkeri, B. recurrentis, B. turdi, B. turicatae, B. valaisiana, Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, C. psittaci, C. trachomatis, Cowdria ruminantium, Coxiella burnetii, Ehrlichia canis, E. chaffeensis, E. equi, E. ewingii, E. muris, E. phagocytophila, E. platys, E. risticii, E. ruminantium, E. sennetsu, Haemobartonella canis, H. felis, H. muris, Mycoplasma arthriditis, M. buccale, M. faucium, M. fermentans, M. genitalium, M. hominis, M. laidlawii, M. lipophilum, M. orale, M. penetrans, M. pirum, M. pneumoniae, M. salivarium, M. spermatophilum, Rickettsia australis, R. conorii, R. felis, R. helvetica, R. japonica, R. massiliae, R. montanensis, R. peacockii, R. prowazekii, R. rhipicephali, R. rickettsii, R. sibirica, and R. typhi. Exemplary intracellular protozoans are Brachiola vesicularum, B. connori, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, E. hellem, E. intestinalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Leishmania aethiopica, L. amazonensis, L. brasiliensis, L. chagasi, L. donovani, L. donovani chagasi, L. donovani donovani, L. donovani infantum, L. enriettii, L. guyanensis, L. infantum, L. major, L. mexicana, L. panamensis, L. peruviana, L. pifanoi, L. tarentolae, L. tropica, Microsporidium ceylonensis, M. africanum, Nosema connori, Nosema ocularum, N. algerae, Plasmodium berghei, P. brasilianum, P. chabaudi, P. chabaudi adami, P. chabaudi chabaudi, P. cynomolgi, P. falciparum, P. fragile, P. gallinaceum, P. knowlesi, P. lophurae, P. malariae, P. ovale, P. reichenowi, P. simiovale, P. simium, P. vinckeipetteri, P. vinckei vinckei, P. vivax, P. yoelii, P. yoelii nigeriensis, P. yoelii yoelii, Pleistophora anguillarum, P. hippoglossoideos, P. mirandellae, P. ovariae, P. typicalis, Septata intestinalis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trachipleistophora hominis, T anthropophthera, Vittaforma corneae, Trypanosoma avium, T. brucei, T. brucei brucei, T. brucei gambiense, T. brucei rhodesiense, T. cobitis, T. congolense, T. cruzi, T. cyclops, T equiperdum, T. evansi, T. dionisii, T godfreyi, T. grayi, T. lewisi, T. mega, T. microti, T. pestanai, T. rangeli, T. rotatorium, T. simiae, T. theileri, T. varani, T vespertilionis, and T. vivax.

(41) Infectious fungi that may be used in the invention include yeast such as Candida albicans, Candida stellatoidea, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei, Candida pseudotropicalis, Candida quillermondii, Candida glabrata, Candida lusianiae, and Candida rugosa. Other fungi include Microsporum canis and other M. spp., Trichophyton spp. (e.g., T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes), Torulopsis glabrata, Epidermophyton floccosum, Malassezia furfur, Pityropsporon orbiculare, P. ovale, Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus spp., Zygomycetes (e.g., Rhizopus, Mucor), Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Blastomyces dermatitides, Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, and Sporothrix schenckii.

(42) For generation of a library in a bacterial host, any vector capable of expressing the cloned polynucleotide may be used in the host bacteria. In one embodiment, a laboratory strain of E. coli is used; appropriate vectors for expression in E. coli are well known in the art and include vectors such as the pET expression vector system (EMD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.), pDESTSL8 (described herein), and pDEST17 (Invitrogen). Vectors may be modified to include N- or C-terminal tags, as desired, for example, for use in verification of the library (e.g., as described herein). Such vectors may also contain an inducible promoter (e.g., the T7 polymerase promoter) as are well known in the art, which allow for expression upon application of an exogenous chemical (e.g., IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside)) or upon application of a phage (e.g., CE6 phage) depending on the bacterial strain used.

(43) For generation of viral libraries (e.g., phage display libraries), polynucleotides forming a library are cloned into phage vectors. Such vectors and vector systems are well known in the art and include the Novagen T7Select? phage display vectors (EMD Biosciences).

(44) In certain embodiments, bacterial libraries of the invention, in addition to containing a first polynucleotide from the pathogenic organism, may contain an second polynucleotide sequence, either as part of the first polynucleotide (in addition to the sequence from the pathogenic organism) or as part of a second expression vector. This second polynucleotide sequence may encode a second protein, for example, listeriolysin O (LLO).

(45) E. coli/LLO System

(46) The E. coli/LLO system provides a means for a protein expressed in E. coli, following endocytosis into a cell, to escape from the vacuole in which it is endocytosed, and contact the cytosol of the cell (FIG. 3). LLO acts by perforating the vacuole, thereby allowing its contents to escape into the cytoplasm. Listeriolysin O exhibits greater pore-forming ability at mildly acidic pH (the pH conditions within the vacuole) and is therefore well suited for this purpose. This allows for enhanced processing of the expressed protein through the MHC class I pathway (see FIGS. 4-6). This system is described extensively in U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,815, which is hereby incorporated by reference. In addition to LLO, the libraries and methods of the invention may employ other proteins with similar activity; any protein (e.g., a pore-forming protein) that facilitates delivery of potentially antigenic proteins to the cytoplasm of a cell capable of endocytosing the bacteria or virus of the library of the invention may be employed. The E. coli/LLO system is particularly useful for screening for antigens that activate CD8.sup.+ CTL cells. Libraries of the invention prepared without LLO may be used to screen for CD4.sup.+ CTL cell activation.

(47) The examples presented herein are intended to illustrate, rather than limit, the present invention.

EXAMPLE 1

Cloning Chlamydia trachomatis Genome

(48) Each ORF in the Chlamydia trachomatis serovar D/UW-3/Cx genome was amplified through a 2-step PCR procedure. The first step used primers specific for each ORF to amplify each sequence in a 96-well format. The primers were designed to remove any secretion signal sequences present in the ORFs to prevent secretion in E. coli when they are expressed and to minimize toxicity. The second PCR step was used to add the required recombination sequences to the 5 and 3 ends of each PCR product.

(49) Once the ORFs were amplified and the recombination sequences were added, the PCR products were recombined into a DONR vector. This can be done using the Gateway system or the MAGIC system. For this library, the Gateway system was used. The final PCR product was incubated with the pDONR221 plasmid in the presence of Gateway BP recombinase. After an overnight incubation, the reaction solution was transformed directly into E. coli which were then plated on kanamycin-containing LB agar plates to select for the presence of the DONR plasmid. Any bacteria that grow must contain a DONR vector which has recombined with a PCR product because the DONR plasmid is toxic to E. coli if it has not recombined due to the presence of a toxin gene in the plasmid. When the DONR plasmid recombines with a PCR product this toxin gene is lost allowing the bacteria to support the presence of the plasmid.

(50) The MAGIC recombination system works very similarly, except the PCR product is transformed directly into E. coli which already contain the MAGIC1 donor vector. The recombination step occurs within the bacteria. Successful recombination events are then selected for by plating the bacteria on plates containing chlorophenylalanine. This chemical is toxic to E. coli containing the magic donor vector that has not recombined with the PCR product due to the presence of the pheS gene in the vector, which again is lost during a successful recombination. Only E. coli that contain a donor vector that has recombined with the PCR product survive. The whole transformation process in either system is done in a 96-well format including the plating procedure to ensure that all colonies appearing in any well on the agar plate are the result of a successful recombination of only the single ORF sequence that was amplified in the corresponding well during the PCR step. This allows for the cloning of each ORF in clonal populations.

(51) A clone for each ORF was inoculated into LB containing kanamycin in 96-deep well plates. The plasmid DNA from each clone was isolated through a 96-well mini-prep procedure. Primers complimentary to sequences in the DONR vector 5 and 3 of the cloned ORF sequence were used to PCR amplify the sequence that was recombined into the vector. The PCR product was run on an agarose gel and the size of the product was compared to the predicted size. Any clone that contained a recombined sequence which was significantly different from the predicted size was abandoned and a new clone for that ORF was chosen and tested for the proper size. All clones that contained sequences of the proper length were moved on to the next step of the cloning procedure.

(52) For the MAGIC system, the donor vector can be used to express the ORFs; thus, no further cloning is required. In the Gateway system, however, the ORF sequence is shuttled to a second vector containing a promoter that allows for expression of the ORF. This was accomplished by incubating the isolated DONR plasmid DNA with the destination vector pDESTSL8 in the presence of Gateway LR recombinase. pDESTSL8 was constructed in our lab from pDEST17 (FIG. 7) by adding a C-terminal fusion which contains the SIINFEKL epitope (SEQ ID NO:155). After an 18 hr incubation, the reaction solution was transformed directly into E. coli which was then plated on carbenicillin-containing LB agar plates in a 96-well format. A clone for each ORF was inoculated into carbenicillin-containing LB in 96-well plates to select for the bacteria that have taken up pDESTSL8 that has recombined in the ORF sequence. The plasmid DNA for each clone was isolated and primers complimentary to sequences in pDESTSL8 5 and 3 of the recombined ORF were used to PCR amplify the recombined sequence. These product of the PCR amplification were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis; any clone with an insert of an incorrect size was abandoned and a new clone for that ORF was tested. Every clone with an insert with the correct size was deemed correct and was moved on to be tested for expression.

(53) Generation of Libraries from Neoplastic Cells

(54) In another embodiment of the invention, a replicable library that includes polynucleotides encoding at least fragments of polypeptides whose expression is increased (e.g., by a factor of at least 1.05, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 25, 50, or 100 times) in a neoplastic cell such as a cancer cell (e.g., a breast cancer cell) as compared to the corresponding normal cell is provided. Identification of a set of polynucleotides with increased expression in neoplastic cells may be performed by any method known in the art. Typically, expression is profiled using an expression array, such as those available from Affymetrix. Polynucleotides whose expression is increased in a neoplastic cell are thus identified using such expression arrays and may be subsequently used to generate a library of the invention.

(55) Cloning of polynucleotides whose expression is increased in a neoplasm may be performed by reverse transcription of the individual mRNAs transcribed from each polynucleotide identified as having increased expression. Primers specific to each mRNA are selected and used to individually transcribe the mRNA sequences into DNA sequences. The DNA sequences may then be cloned in an appropriate vector containing a promoter capable of expression in the cell or virus of the library, typically following amplification of each DNA sequence by PCR. Once each polynucleotide is cloned into a vector, the polynucleotides may be introduced into a cell or virus as described herein.

(56) Polynucleotides overexpressed in neoplastic cells as compared to normal cells may also be identified through the use of cDNA subtraction libraries. Methods for generating such libraries are known in the art and are commercially available, for example, the Clonetech PCR-Select products (Clonetech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, Calif.).

(57) Expression of Polynucleotides

(58) For use in the methods of the invention, a cell or virus forming a member of a library can express the polynucleotide encoding at least a portion of a polypeptide from the pathogenic organism. In bacterial systems with inducible promoters, this is accomplished by administration of the appropriate substance (e.g., chemical or phage) to induce protein expression. In the case of the C. trachomatis library described in Example 1, this was performed as follows.

EXAMPLE 2

Expression of C. trachomatis Polynucleotides

(59) Each expression plasmid containing an ORF was transformed into E. coli which already contained a plasmid to express the cytosolic form of listeriolysin O (cLLO). The bacteria were plated on LB agar plates containing both carbenicillin and chloramphenicol to select for both plasmids. A colony for each ORF was picked, inoculated into carbenicillin and chloramphenicol containing LB in 96-well plates and grown for 18 hrs. The stationary phase culture was then diluted into fresh LB containing 0.2% maltose, carbenicillin and chloramphenicol. After 4 hours of growth the OD.sub.600 was taken for each well to determine the number of bacteria in each well. MgSO.sub.4 was added to bring the concentration to 10 mM in each culture. CE6 phage, a replication deficient lambda phage which contains in its genome the gene for T7 polymerase under a constitutive promoter, was then added at an MOI of 12:1. Once the phage has infected the bacteria, the T7 polymerase is expressed which can then transcribe a chlamydial ORF under the control of a T7 promoter. The cultures were gently mixed and incubated without shaking for 20 minutes at 37? C. After 20 min, the cultures were incubated shaking for an additional 1 hour and 40 minutes to allow for expression of ORF. The OD.sub.600 from each well was then measured to determine the concentration of bacteria in each culture well. 1?10.sup.8 bacteria were harvested from each well, pelleted and resuspended in 1 mL of 0.5% paraformaldehyde. The cultures were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The cultures were then pelleted and washed three times with PBS. After the final wash, the cell were pelleted and resuspended in 1 mL of RP-10 media. The cultures were then aliquoted out in volumes of 204, into 96-well plates and frozen at ?80? C. This procedure can yield greater than 50 separate aliquots of the library to screen different T-cell lines.

(60) Verification of the Expression of the Library

(61) Any method known in the art may be used to determine whether each member of the library is able to express the polynucleotide from the pathogenic organism or a neoplastic cell (e.g., western blotting). In the C. trachomatis library described herein, verification of expression was accomplished as follows.

EXAMPLE 3

Testing for Expression

(62) We developed a high-throughput test for protein expression utilizing the SIINFEKL epitope (SEQ ID NO:155) fused to the C-terminus of each ORF for verification of protein expression (FIGS. 8-10). To perform this assay, a frozen aliquot of the library is thawed and added to macrophages of the H2.sup.b haplotype, which were seeded the previous day in 96-well plates. The macrophage/bacteria mixture is incubated for an hour during which time the bacteria are phagocytosed by the macrophages. In the phagosome, the bacteria are lysed, releasing all of the proteins being expressed by the E. coli into the vacuole including the chlamydial protein and cLLO. The cLLO then perforates the phagosome membrane, allowing the chlamdyial protein access to the cytosol of the macrophage where it can be processed and peptides from the protein can be presented on MHC Class I molecules. If the chlamydial protein was expressed to full length, it has the SIINFEKL epitope (SEQ ID NO:155) fused to its C-terminus. This epitope will be delivered along with the chlamydial protein and will be processed and presented on the MHC Class I molecules on the surface of the macrophages. This MHC-peptide complex is probed for by adding B3Z T-cell hybridoma cells at the end of the hour incubation. B3Z cells become activated when they recognize the MHC-SIINFEKL complex (FIG. 9). When they become activated, ?-galactosidase expression is induced. The B3Z cells are incubated with the macrophages for 15-20 hours to allow the B3Z cells time to scan the macrophages for the MHC-peptide complex and upregulate ?-galactosidase if the complex is present. After 15-20 hours, LacZ buffer is added to detect the amount of ?-galactosidase activity in each well of the plate. LacZ buffer contains a detergent to lyse the macrophages and a ?-galactosidase substrate, chlorophenyl red-?-D-galactopyranoside (CPRG), which turns from yellow to purple when it is cleaved by ?-galactosidase. The amount of cleaved product is determined by measuring the OD.sub.570 nm of each well in a spectrophotometer. Thus, a strong signal at 570 nm indicates both that the chlamydial protein that was expressed in that well was expressed to full length and was delivered to the MHC Class I pathway.

(63) Determining Whether a Polypeptide from a Pathogen or Neoplastic Cell is Immunogenic

(64) A library of cells or viruses contain polynucleotides encoding polypeptides from a pathogenic organism or from a neoplastic cell may be screened to determine which of the polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides are immunogenic. This may be accomplished by contacting each member of the library with a second cell (e.g., a macrophage) capable of endocytosing the cell or virus of the library, and displaying portions of the expressed polypeptide of the library on the surface of the second cell. This process is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,415. The second cell is then contacted with a CTL cell from an organism previously infected with the pathogenic organism, a CTL cell from an organism with a neoplasm, or a CTL cell from an organism that previously had a neoplasm. Contacting with a CTL cell may be proceeded by fixing the second cell, e.g., using paraformaldehyde. A CTL capable of binding a presented portion of the antigen/protein will result in secretion of cytokines. Cytokine secretion (e.g., secretion of IFN?, IL-2, or TNF) may be assayed for as is known in the art, for example, using an ELISA assay. In a working example, the C. trachomatis library described herein was screened as described in Example 4 below.

(65) Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes

(66) Pools of CTL cells for use in the methods of the invention may be derived by any means known in the art. Typically, in screening for antigens to pathogenic organisms, CTL cells are prepared from a mammal previously infected with the pathogen. This preparation will contain CTL cells specific for antigens from the pathogen.

(67) C. trachomatis-specific CTLs may be elicited from mice as follows. A mouse was injected i.p. with 10.sup.7 IFU of C. trachomatis. 14 days later the mouse was euthanized and the spleen was harvested. The spleen was mashed through a 70 ?m screen to create a single cell solution of splenocytes. The CD8.sup.+ T-cells were isolated from the splenocytes using ?-CD8 antibodies bound to MACS magnetic beads using MACS separation protocols standard in the art (see, for example, MACS technology available from Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, Calif.). The isolated CD8.sup.+ cells were added to macrophages of the same haplotype which were infected with C. trachomatis 18 hours prior in a 24-well dish. Irradiated splenocytes from a na?ve mouse were added as feeder cells in media containing IL-2. The cells were incubated for 10 days during which time the C. trachomatis-specific T-cells were stimulated by the infected macrophages and replicated. On day 10 the T-cells were stimulated again using macrophages infected with C. trachomatis 18 hours prior and irradiated splenocytes. This procedure was repeated until sufficient amounts of T-cells were present to screen the entire library.

(68) For preparation of CTL cells for use in screening for antigens to neoplastic cells, e.g., breast cancer cells, polyclonal CTL pools specific to breast cancer are generated using whole tumor RNA. The CTL pool is then verified using known tumor-associated antigens (FIG. 11).

(69) CTL cells may be cloned from a human subject as described by, for example, Hassell et al. (Immunology 79:513-519, 1993).

EXAMPLE 4

Screening for Unknown Antigens

(70) A frozen aliquot of the library (10 96-well plates in total) is thawed and added to macrophages which were seeded the previous day in 10 96-well plates. The plates are incubated for 2 hours, washed and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde to kill the macrophages and stabilize any MHC Class I-peptide interactions. The cells are then washed again to remove the paraformaldehyde. C. trachomatis-specific CD8.sup.+ T-cells of unknown specificity are then added to each well. If the epitope the T-cells recognize is being presented in a given well, the T-cells will become activated. T-cell activation is detected by measuring the amount of IFN? present in the supernatant of each well after 18-20 hours of culture using an IFN? ELISA kit (see FIG. 12). This may also be accomplished by testing for other cytokines released by activated T-cells such as IL-2. Any well which contains a much higher concentration of IFN? than all the rest of the wells suggests the corresponding chlamydial protein in the library is a possible antigen. For any possible antigen, the process is repeated to ensure that the hit is not a false positive. If the antigen activates the T-cells in the secondary screen, the ORF is deemed an antigen and is moved on to epitope identification.

(71) Epitope Identification

(72) Once a polypeptide antigen is identified, it is often desirable to identify the epitope within the polypeptide to which the CTL cell is responding. This may be accomplished by recursively assaying each portion of the polypeptide using cloning techniques known in the art, or may be achieved using a system such as the Erase-a-Base kit (Promega). The truncated polypeptides are screened against CTL cells as described herein to determine which portions of the polypeptide are required to generate an immunogenic response.

(73) In one embodiment, the specific peptide epitope recognized by the T-cell line is identified by making nested deletions of the full antigen sequence using the Erase-a-Base kit from Promega. The plasmid clone containing the antigen sequence is first digested with NheI and AatII. The NheI cut creates the proper 5 overhang near the 3 end of the ORF to allow the nucleases in the Erase-a-Base kit to cleave 3-5 through the antigen sequence while the 3 overhang of the AatII cut site prevents the nuclease from digesting in the other direction and removing the sequence for the drug resistance cassette. Once the plasmid is cut with the restriction enzymes, the Erase-a-Base kit is used to make a series of 3 truncations in the sequence encoding the antigen by following the protocol supplied with the kit. These truncations are ligated and transformed into E. coli containing the plasmid to express cLLO. Protein expression is then induced with CE6 phage as described above. When expressed, the truncations will create proteins that are missing increasing amounts of their C-terminal peptide sequence. The different truncation clones are then rescreened with the original T-cell line using the procedure outlined above. The clones that no longer activate the T-cell line have lost the sequence of the epitope recognized by the T-cell line. The sequences of the largest truncation clone that no longer contains the epitope and the shortest truncation clone that still does contain the epitope are determined. The location of the 3 edge of the epitope resides in the peptide sequence the shortest positive clone contains and the largest negative clone does not. Overlapping 8-10 mer peptides of this sequence are synthesized. The peptides are then pulsed onto macrophages and screened for their ability to activate the T-cell line. The peptide that is capable of activating the T-cell line is deemed the epitope.

(74) CT788

(75) The invention also features the CT788 (Cta1) polypeptide and fragments thereof (e.g., immunogenic fragments including amino acids 133-152 of the CT788 protein (SEQ ID NO:2) and those listed in Table 1 (SEQ ID NOS:3-154) (e.g., an immunogenic fragment listed in Table 1)), pharmaceutical and vaccine compositions including the CT788 protein or fragments thereof (e.g., those described herein), and methods for treating or preventing a bacteria infection (e.g., a Chlamydia infection) by administration of CT788 or a fragment (e.g., an immunogenic fragment) thereof (e.g., a fragment described herein).

(76) Identification of CT788 as an Antigenic Protein of C. trachomatis

(77) Although pathogen-specific TCR tg T cells had been used previously in other infectious disease models (Butz et al., Immunity 8:167-75, 1998; Sano et al., J. Exp. Med. 194:173-80, 2001; Roman et al., J. Exp. Med. 196:957-68, 2002; Coles et al., J. Immunol. 168:834-838, 2002; McSorley et al., Immunity 16:365-377, 2002), the NR1 mice described below are the first TCR tg mice with T cells specific for a pathogen that infects the genital tract. Previously, it had not been possible to examine T cell responses to genital pathogens such as C. trachomatis because it was difficult to identify and track na?ve T cells specific for genital antigens in vivo. In particular, the inability to modify C. trachomatis genetically to express a heterologous T cell epitope as well as the lack of a well-defined Chlamydia-specific CD4.sup.+ T cell antigen had made it difficult to study T cell responses to this genital pathogen.

(78) Because murine CD4.sup.+ T cell antigens recognized during Chlamydia infection had not been previously defined, analysis of primary Chlamydia-specific T cell responses had been limited to examining polyclonal T cell responses to undefined antigens (Cain et al., Infect. Immunol. 63:1784-1789, 1995). In these previous experiments, the investigators could not differentiate true Chlamydia-specific T cell responses from bystander T cell activation, which has been shown to contribute to the overall response in a number of other infectious disease models (Yang et al., J. Immunol. 136:1186-1193, 1986; Tough et al., Immunol. Rev. 150:129-142, 1996). As described below, we identified a CD4.sup.+ T cell antigen Cta1 (CT788), which allows examination of an antigen-specific T cell response stimulated during C. trachomatis infection. This antigen was predicted to be a periplasmic protein because of an N-terminal signal sequence, but its function is unknown (Stephens et al., Science 282:754-759, 1998). Cta1 is conserved in all of the C. trachomatis serovars that have been sequenced, including those that cause genital tract infection, ocular infection, and LGV. Cta1 stimulated protective T cells following natural infection, suggesting that this protein may play a significant role in immunity against C. trachomatis.

(79) Another difficulty in studying the initial encounter of T cells with antigen is the low precursor frequency of pathogen-specific T cells in an unimmunized animal. Other investigators have attempted to increase the frequency of Chlamydia-specific T cells by transferring T cell clones of unknown specificity into Chlamydia-infected mice (Hawkins et al., Infect. Immunol. 68:5587-5594, 2000; Hawkins et al., Infect. Immunol. 70:5132-5139, 2002). Because the transferred T cells are antigen-experienced and have been propagated through multiple rounds of restimulation, the response of these T cells cannot be used to model the initial encounter of na?ve T cells with C. trachomatis. To overcome the limitations of previous approaches and study the initial Chlamydia-specific T cell response, we developed NR1, a TCR tg mouse line specific for Cta1. Here, adoptive transfer of NR1 cells into unimmunized mice was used to increase the frequency of na?ve, Chlamydia-specific T cells while still maintaining the polyclonal T cell environment in the recipient animals (Pape et al., Immunol. Rev. 156:67-78, 1997).

(80) The response of Chlamydia-specific T cells to the infected murine genital tract was then examined. An infection model where the uterus of the mouse was inoculated with the human C. trachomatis serovar L2 was employed. This route of infection had been previously used to prime Chlamydia-specific T cells that could subsequently be cultured from the spleen (Stambach et al., Infect. Immunol. 63:3527-3530, 1995) and has also been demonstrated to cause salpingitis in mice (Tuffrey et al., Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 67:605-16, 1986; Tuffrey et al., J. Exp. Pathol. (Oxford) 71:403-10, 1990). Other studies have used a different Chlamydia species, Chlamydia muridarum, as a mouse model of infection. C. muridarum is not known to infect humans but causes an ascending infection when inoculated into the vaginal vault of female mice. We were, however, unable to use this model, as our Cta1-specific T cells did not recognize C. muridarum-infected cells (data not shown), suggesting the Cta1 epitope in C. trachomatis may not be conserved in the Cta1 homolog in C. muridarum.

(81) Using intrauterine infection with a human serovar of C. trachomatis, Chlamydia-specific T cells exhibited a Th1 response in the genital tract in response to infection. These cells secreted IFN? while still in the ILNs, and secretion continued following migration into the infected genital tract. IFN? has long been implicated as a critical effector in Chlamydia clearance, but may also be a cause of the tissue pathology associated with infection. In vitro, IFN? enhances the ability of phagocytes to control Chlamydia replication (Rottenberg et al., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:444-451, 2002). In vivo, susceptibility to Chlamydia infection is increased in IFN??/? mice and Chlamydia-specific T cells transferred into mice only appear to be protective if they secrete IFN? (Loomis et al., Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:87-91, 2002). Besides its role in protection, IFN? induces Chlamydia to develop into a persistent state in vitro (Rottenberg et al., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:444-451, 2002; Hogan et al., Infect. Immunol. 72:1843-1855, 2004.), and there is evidence that organisms persist in some human infections (Villareal et al., Arthritis. Res. 4:5-9, 2002). Persistence or repeated infection with Chlamydia may contribute to tissue scarring in vivo (Beatty et al., Microbiol. Rev. 58:686-699, 1994). Consistent with the hypothesis that IFN? may promote tissue pathology, lymphocytes from patients with Chlamydia-associated tubal factor infertility secreted high levels of IFN? in response to Chlamydia relative to lymphocytes from control patients (Kinnunen et al., Clin. Exp. Immunol. 131:299-303, 2003).

(82) In our model, upregulation of CD69 on NR1 T cells in the ILNs did not occur until three days following genital infection and proliferation did not occur until four days following the infection. The period between intrauterine Chlamydia inoculation and activation of NR1 cells may define the amount of time required for Chlamydia antigens to travel into the draining lymph nodes where the antigen can activate na?ve T cells. This timing was significantly later than the proliferation induced in the spleen after systemic infection (data not shown). Elements of the immune system in the genital tissues are less well-characterized than those in intestinal tissues, but differences between these two mucosal surfaces are nonetheless apparent. Unlike the intestinal lumen, the genital mucosa lacks organized lymphoid elements (Parr et al., Biol. Reprod. 44:491-498, 1991; Nandi et al., Reg. Immunol. 5:332-338, 1993). While the intestinal lumen is equipped with Peyer's Patches that can immediately sample luminal contents, the initiation of T lymphocyte responses against genital pathogens must occur outside the genital mucosa, perhaps in the ILNs, which drain antigen from the genital tract (Parr et al., J. Reprod. Immunol. 17:101-14, 1990; Cain et al., Infect. Immunol. 63:1784-9, 1995; Hawkins et al., Infect. Immunol. 68:5587-94, 2000; Nandi et al., Reg. Immunol. 5:332-338, 1993). For example, T cells specific for the enteric pathogen S. enterica have been shown to be activated in the Peyer's Patches a few hours after oral infection, and T cells in these nodes proliferated extensively by two days post-infection (McSorley et al., Immunity 16:365-377, 2002). The amount of time it takes Chlamydia antigens to migrate from the genital surface to the ILNs may explain the lack of NR1 activation prior to three days post-infection.

(83) The genital and intestinal mucosa also differ in cell surface adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting lymphocytes. Whereas interaction of the a4(37 integrin on lymphocytes with the MAdCAM-1 adhesion molecule on the intestinal endothelium mediates recruitment of T lymphocytes to the intestinal mucosa, such an interaction does not appear to play a significant role in recruitment to the genital mucosa (Rott et al., J. Immunol. 156:3727-2736, 1996; Perry et al., J. Immunol. 160:2905-2914, 1998).

(84) It has been previously demonstrated that T cells can protect mice against Chlamydia infection (Starnbach et al., J. Immunol., 153:5183-9, 1994; Starnbach et al., J. Immunol., 171:4742-9, 2003). However, previously it was not been possible to determine when and where na?ve Chlamydia-specific T cells first encounter antigens, how they traffic following activation, and when and where they proliferate. A major limitation in analyzing these early events is the low precursor frequency of na?ve Chlamydia-specific T cells. However, we have now generated the first tool to study the response of Chlamydia-specific na?ve T cellsa T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mouse.

(85) Chlamydia Specific CD4+ T Cell Clone. To identify a Chlamydia-specific TCR for the creation of TCR transgenic mice, we generated a Chlamydia-specific CD4.sup.+ T cell clone named NR9.2. The clone specifically secreted IFN? when co-cultured with Chlamydia-infected macrophages in an intracellular cytokine staining assay (FIG. 13A). In addition, adoptive transfer of this clone protected na?ve mice from Chlamydia infection (FIG. 13B). A library of proteins expressed by the C. trachomatis ORFs contained in the genome database was screened. Of the 894 ORFs we screened, only E. coli expressing the protein encoded by CT788 (FIG. 14) stimulated NR9.2 to secrete significant levels of IFN? (FIG. 15). CT788 was annotated in the published C. trachomatis genome as a predicted periplasmic protein of unknown function (Stephens et al., Science 282:754-759, 1998), and its sequence shares little homology with proteins outside of the Chlamydia genus. CT788 was designated Cta1 (Chlamydia-specific T cell antigen-1).

(86) Mice Expressing the TCR from the NR9.2 Clone. We then generated mice expressing the TCR from the NR9.2 clone. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the resulting TCR transgenic mice expressed the same variable chain elements (V?2, V?8.3) as the T cell clone from which they were derived. We cloned the rearranged genomic TCR? and TCR? sequences from NR9.2 into expression vectors and injected these constructs into C57BL/6 fertilized oocytes. Pseudopregnant female recipients were then implanted with the oocytes and individual pups born from the foster mothers were screened using primers specific for the NR9.2 TCR. A TCR tg founder line was identified and designated NR1. To confirm that the NR9.2 TCR was expressed on the transgenic cells in NR1, cells from the peripheral blood of these animals were tested for expression of the V?2 and V?8.3 TCR elements. V?2 and V?8.3 were the variable chains expressed by the original NR9.2 T cell clone (data not shown). A significant percentage of CD4.sup.+ T cells from the peripheral blood of the transgenic mice expressed V?2 and V?8.3 (FIG. 16A), demonstrating that both the TCR? and TCR? transgenes from NR9.2 were efficiently expressed. The transgenic cells were also CD69.sup.lo, CD25.sup.lo, CD62L.sup.hi, CD44.sup.lo, and CTLA4.sup.lo, indicating that they were na?ve T cells (data not shown).

(87) To determine whether the NR1 transgenic T cells were specific and responsive to Cta1, we tested the proliferation of transgenic spleen cells in response to Cta1.sub.133-152 (see FIG. 14; SEQ ID NO:2). Spleen cells from na?ve NR1 mice showed a strong proliferative response to Cta1.sub.133-152 (FIG. 16B). NR1 spleen cells also secreted high levels of IFN? in response to this peptide (data not shown). In contrast, spleen cells from NR1 did not proliferate in response to a control peptide from ovalbumin, OVA.sub.323-336 (data not shown).

(88) To determine whether the NR1 transgenic T cells responded to Chlamydia in vivo, thirty million cells from the spleen and peripheral lymph nodes of NR1 mice were labeled with the fluorescent dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and adoptively transferred into C57BL/6 recipients. As approximately 10% of NR1 cells were CD4.sup.+ T cells expressing the Cta1-specific TCR (data not shown), the transferred population contained approximately 3?10.sup.6 Cta1-specific T cells. CFSE-labeled NR1 transgenic cells retained high levels of CFSE following transfer into uninfected recipient mice, indicating that the transgenic cells did not divide in the absence of infection.

(89) In other C57BL/6 animals that had received the CFSE-labeled transgenic cells, the animals were infected intravenously with 10.sup.7 IFU of C. trachomatis. The C. trachomatis organisms used for infection were serovar L2, which is associated with lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) in humans, or serovar D, which is associated with typical human genital tract infection. Within three days of infection with either C. trachomatis serovar, the transgenic cells had proliferated extensively (FIG. 17). We also observed that the proliferation of NR1 cells was specific for C. trachomatis infection. When animals that had received NR1 cells were infected intravenously with Salmonella enterica or Listeria monocytogenes, the transgenic T cells were not stimulated to proliferate. As an additional control to demonstrate that TCR tg T cells with other specificities would not respond to C. trachomatis infection in the recipient mice, we showed that ovalbumin-specific OTII transgenic T cells proliferated in response to ovalbumin protein with adjuvant (data not shown) but not in response to C. trachomatis infection (FIG. 17).

(90) To study CD4.sup.+ T cell responses to C. trachomatis in the context of a mucosal infection, Thy1.1 (CD90.1) recipient mice adoptively transferred with CFSE-labeled transgenic cells were infected in the uterine horns with C. trachomatis L2. Using Thy1.1 recipient mice, donor transgenic cells were readily distinguished from endogenous cells in the recipient animals. The activation status of the transgenic cells was assessed by examining cell surface expression of the early activation marker CD69 and the na?ve T cell marker CD62L on T cells from iliac lymph nodes (ILNs), which drain antigen from the genital tract (Parr et al., J. Reprod. Immunol. 17:101-14, 1990; Cain et al., Infect. Immunol. 63:1784-9, 1995; Hawkins et al., Infect. Immunol. 68:5587-94, 2000). The ILNs were removed five days after infection and NR1 T cells in the nodes were examined for CD69 upregulation and loss of CFSE fluorescence. Transgenic cells in uninfected mice were predominantly not activated)(CD69.sup.lo) and of the na?ve phenotype (CD62L.sup.hi). Following infection, CD69 was upregulated on cells that had undergone a few rounds of cell division and downregulated on cells that had undergone further rounds of division. CD62L was downregulated on a sub-population of transgenic cells that had extensively divided (FIG. 18A). Whereas T cell proliferation was weak in the non-draining lymph nodes, extensive T cell proliferation was observed four days post-infection in the draining lymph nodes (FIG. 18B). After activation and proliferation, transgenic cells were also recruited to the genital mucosa in infected mice (FIG. 18C).

(91) As shown in FIG. 18A, a significant number of NR1 T cells from infected animals showed progressive dilution of CFSE, suggesting that extensive proliferation had occurred. Furthermore, recently divided (CFSE.sup.med) NR1 T cells expressed high levels of CD69, indicating that these cells also had been recently activated. Once NR1 cells had undergone extensive proliferation)(CFSE.sup.lo), they expressed lower levels of CD69. These results are consistent with CD69 as an early T cell activation marker that is only transiently upregulated following antigen encounter (Ziegler et al., Stem Cells 12:456-65, 1994; Cochran et al., Immunity 12:241-50, 2000). Cells from the ILNs of mock infected recipients were CFSE.sup.hi and had not upregulated CD69, suggesting that they were not activated. Interestingly, there was a similar population of CFSE.sup.hiCD69.sup.lo NR1 cells in the infected recipients. These could be cells that did not encounter antigen, or they could be cells that were not expressing the appropriate Cta1-specific TCR because of endogenous TCR rearrangements (von Boehmer, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8:531-556, 1990; Balomenos et al., J. Immunol. 155:3308-3312, 1995).

(92) Other characteristics of activated T cells include downregulation of the naive marker CD62L and upregulation of the activation molecule CD44. To confirm that NR1 cells were activated following Chlamydia genital infection, the expression of CD62L and CD44 on transferred CFSE-labeled NR1 T cells from the ILNs of recipient mice was analyzed. Seven days after infection, a subset of NR1 T cells that had proliferated extensively)(CFSE.sup.lo had reduced expression of CD62L (FIG. 18A). By contrast, undivided (CFSE.sup.hi) NR1 cells in both mock infected and infected recipients were mostly CD62L.sup.hi. In addition to displaying a CD62L.sup.lo phenotype, effector T cells typically express high levels of the activation marker CD44. Proliferating NR1 T cells from the ILNs of infected recipients were exclusively CD44.sup.hi (FIG. 18A). Thus, NR1 cells were activated and proliferated in the ILNs of mice following genital infection with Chlamydia.

(93) Extensive proliferation of NR1 cells occurs preferentially in the ILNs. To confirm that activation and proliferation of NR1 cells in the ILNs resulted from antigen draining from the genital tract to these nodes, the response of NR1 cells in the ILNs was compared to the response in the lymph nodes that do not drain the genital tract (nondraining lymph nodes, NDLNs). T cell activation and proliferation was monitored over time to ensure that any activity that may have occurred in the NDLNs over the course of infection would be observed. 3?10.sup.7 CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 mice. The mice were then infected in the uterus with 10.sup.6 IFU C. trachomatis serovar L2. Lymph nodes were then harvested at various times following infection. In the ILNs, upregulation of CD69 was seen on NR1 cells beginning three days after infection. Four days after infection, downregulation of CD62L and upregulation of CD44 was observed. Acquisition of the activation markers occurred preferentially in NR1 cells from the ILNs and not in NR1 cells from the NDLNs (data not shown). Thus, NR1 cells were specifically activated in the ILNs following genital infection with Chlamydia.

(94) By monitoring proliferation of the transferred NR1 cells at various times following infection, we confirmed that NR1 cells preferentially encountered antigen in the ILNs. In the ILNs, NR1 cells were predominantly CFSE.sup.hi two and three days post infection, suggesting that these cells had not proliferated at these early time points (FIG. 19), but NR1 cells in the ILNs had proliferated extensively within four days of infection. While NR1 cells had also proliferated in the NDLNs within four days of infection, the number was significantly less than that seen in the ILNs. The proliferating NR1 cells in the NDLNs contained lower levels of CFSE and did not express significant levels of CD69 relative those in the ILNs (data not shown), suggesting that these cells migrated to the NDLNs from other sites following activation. Significant expansion of NR1 T cells in the NDLNs did not occur even one week after infection (data not shown), again demonstrating that proliferation of NR1 cells occurred preferentially in the ILNs.

(95) NR1 Cells in the ILNs Develop the Ability to Secrete IFN?. To examine the differentiation of antigen-activated NR1 cells into effector T cells, we determined that proliferating NR1 cells secreted effector cytokines in response to C. trachomatis infection. 3?10.sup.7 CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 congenic mice, and then these mice were infected in the uterus with 10.sup.6 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. The ILNs were removed six days later, and the NR1 T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for production of cytokines. Proliferating NR1 cells) (CFSE.sup.lo) secreted IFN? whereas non-proliferating cells (CFSE.sup.hi) did not secrete IFN? (FIG. 20). The NR1 cells did not secrete IL-4 (data not shown). Thus, NR1 cells differentiated preferentially into effector T cells of the Th1 phenotype following genital infection with Chlamydia.

(96) Antigen-Experienced NR1 Cells Traffic to the Genital Tract. Following activation, effector T cells are typically recruited to the site of infection where they contribute to the elimination of the pathogen (Swain et al., Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 512:113-120, 2002; Gallichan et al., J. Exp. Med. 184:1879-1890, 1996). To determine whether Chlamydia-specific NR1 cells migrated to the site of genital infection in mice, 3?10.sup.7 CFSE-labeled NR1 cells were transferred into CD90.1 congenic mice. These recipients were infected in the uterus with 10.sup.6 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. Genital tract tissue was then isolated and the presence of transferred Chlamydia-specific T cells was determined Significantly more NR1 cells were observed in the genital mucosa of animals infected with C. trachomatis than in animals that were mock infected (FIG. 18C). Transgenic cells that were recruited to the genital tract had the phenotype of antigen-experienced cells (CFSE.sup.lo CD62L.sup.lo CD44.sup.hi) and secreted IFN? (FIGS. 21A and 21B). In summary, activated NR1 TCR tg T cells that secrete IFN? are recruited to the genital mucosa in response to C. trachomatis infection.

(97) Antigenic Fragments of Cta1

(98) To map more closely the epitope within Cta1 recognized by the NR9.2 T cells, a series of overlapping 20-mer peptides covering the Cta1 sequence for their ability to stimulate NR9.2 to secrete IFN? were screened (Table 2). The 20-mer peptide Cta1.sub.133-152 (KGIDPQELWVWKKGMPNWEK; SEQ ID NO:2) induced NR9.2 to secrete significant levels of IFN? (FIG. 22), confirming the specificity of these C. trachomatis-specific T cells to an epitope within these 20 amino acids.

(99) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE2 Antigen/Tcellline,peptide,andIFN? measured(ng)(SEQIDNOS:2and156-171) Cta1/NR9.2 LESTSLYKKAGCANKKNRNL 0.4(?0.2) GCANKKNRNLIGWFLAGMFF 0.5(?0.3) IGWFLAGMFFGIFAIIFLLI 0.6(?0.3) GIFAIIFLLILPPLPSSTQD 0.4(?0.2) LPPLPSSTQDNRSMDQQDSE 0.6(?0.2) NRSMDQQDSEEFLLQNTLED 0.6(?0.3) EFLLQNTLEDSEIISIPDTM 0.6(?0.2) SEIISIPDTMNQIAIDTEKW 0.6(?0.2) NQIAIDTEKWFYLNKDYTNV 0.5(?0.2) FYLNKDYTNVGPISIVQLTA 0.7(?0.4) GPISIVQLTAFLKECKHSPE 0.5(?0.3) FLKECKHSPEKGIDPQELWV 0.5(?0.4) KGIDPQELWVWKKGMPNWEK 58.0(?14.0) WKKGMPNWEKVKNIPELSGT 1.4(?0.2) VKNIPELSGTVKDESPSFLV 0.8(?0.1) VKDESPSFLVQSGVAGLEQL 0.7(?0.2) QSGVAGLEQLESI 0.8(?0.2)
By screening deletion peptides of this 20-mer, a minimal sequence required for activation of the NR9.2 can be identified. Epitopic sequences can include 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 amino acid fragments of Cta1.sub.133-152 and can include N-terminal or C-terminal deletions of the Cta1.sub.133-152 fragment, or a combination of N- and C-terminal deletions (see, e.g., Table 1). Further, antigenic peptides in other regions of Cta1 or using other T cell clones can also be identified similarly. Compositions and methods of the invention may include or employ combinations of epitopic fragments described herein. Antigenicity of Cta1 fragments can be determined using methods known in the art and methods described herein.

(100) The experiments described above were performed as follows.

(101) Mice. C57BL/6J (H-2.sup.b), B6.PL-thy1.sup.a0 Cy (CD90.1 congenic), and OTII mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory.

(102) Tissue Culture. Bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and bone marrow derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured as previously described (Steele et al., J. Immunol. 173:6327-6337, 2004; Shaw et al., Infect. Immunol. 74:1001-1008, 2006).

(103) Growth, Isolation, and Detection of Bacteria. Elementary bodies (EBs) of C. trachomatis serovar L2 434/Bu and C. trachomatis serovar D (UW-3/Cs) were propagated and quantitated as previously described (Stambach et al., J. Immunol. 171:4742-4749, 2003). Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) was grown at 37? C. in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Listeria monocytogenes 10403s was grown at 30? C. in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium (Difco/Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.).

(104) Generation of the NR9.2 T Cell Clone. Splenocytes from mice were isolated 21 days after infection with C. trachomatis serovar L2 and were cultured with irradiated (2,000 rads) BMDCs, UV-inactivated C. trachomatis serovar L2, and na?ve syngeneic splenocytes in RP-10 (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, L-glutamine, HEPES, 50 ?M 2-?ME, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 ?g/ml streptomycin) with ?-methyl mannoside and 5% supernatant from concanavalin A-stimulated rat spleen cells. CD8.sup.+ T cells were depleted from the culture using Dynabeads Mouse CD8 (Invitrogen). The CD4.sup.+ T cells were restimulated every seven days with C. trachomatis-pulsed BMDCs. Once a C. trachomatis-specific CD4.sup.+ T cell line was established, the T cell clone NR9.2 was isolated by limiting dilution.

(105) Identification of the T Cell Antigen Cta1. An expression library of genomic sequences from C. trachomatis serovar D was inserted into a modified form of the pDEST17 vector (Invitrogen) and transformed into the Stb12 strain of E. coli (Invitrogen). Following induction of protein expression, the bacteria were fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde and incubated with BMMs. NR9.2 T cells were then added and after 24 h, the supernatant was tested for the level of IFN? by ELISA (Endogen, Rockford, Ill.). To identify the reactive peptide epitope within Cta1, synthetic 20-mer peptides (MIT Biopolymers Lab, Cambridge, Mass.) were used at a concentration of 25 ?M in an IFN? ELISA (Endogen).

(106) Flow Cytometry and Antibodies. Antibodies specific for CD4, CD90.2, V?2, V38.3, CD69, CD25, CD44, CD62L, CTLA-4, IFN?, and IL-4 were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, Calif.). Data were collected on a BD Biosciences FACSCalibur? flow cytometer (San Jose, Calif.) and analyzed using CellQuest? software. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed by incubating NR9.2 T cells with Chlamydia-infected BMMs (MOI 5:1) in the presence of GolgiPlug? reagent (BD Biosciences). Intracellular cytokine staining of NR1 transgenic cells was performed by stimulating cells for 4 hours in the presence of PMA (50 ng/ml, MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio), ionomycin (1 ?g/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and GolgiPlug? reagent (BD Biosciences). Cells were permeabilized with the Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus kit (BD Biosciences). PE-conjugated rat IgG1 (BD Biosciences) was used as an isotype control antibody.

(107) Generation of NR1 TCR Tg Mice. The rearranged TCR from NR9.2 uses the V?2J?16 and V?8.3DJ?1.2 receptor chains. The genomic TCR sequences were cloned and inserted into the TCR vectors pT? and pT? at the recommended restriction sites (Kouskoff et al., J. Immunol. Methods 180:273-80, 1995). Prokaryotic DNA sequences were then removed from both vectors prior to injection into the pronuclei of fertilized C57BL/6J oocytes. TCR transgenic founders were identified by PCR. Routine screening to identify transgenic mice was carried out by staining samples of orbital blood from the mice with antibodies specific for V?2 and V?8.3, followed by flow cytometry.

(108) Adoptive Transfer of NR1 Cells, Infection of Mice, and Preparation of Tissues from Mice. Spleen and peripheral lymph nodes were isolated from NR1 TCR tg mice and labeled with the dye CFSE (5 ?M, Molecular Probes, Eugene, Ore.). Recipient mice were injected i.v. with 3?10.sup.7 NR1 cells. Mice were infected one day after transfer of the cells. Where indicated, mice were infected intravenously with 10.sup.7 IFU of C. trachomatis, 3?10.sup.3 CFU of L. monocytogenes, or 5?10.sup.3 CFU of S. enterica. To infect the genital tract, mice were treated with 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneously one week prior to infection to synchronize the mice into a diestrus state (Perry et al., Infect. Immunol. 67:3686-3689, 1999; Ramsey et al., Infect. Immunol. 67:3019-3025, 1999). Intrauterine infection was carried out by inoculating the uterine horns with 10.sup.6 IFU of C. trachomatis serovar L2. At various times after infection, single-cell suspensions of spleen, ILNs, or NDLNs taken from the axillary and cervical lymph nodes were prepared, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above. To isolate lymphocytes from the genital mucosa, genital tracts (oviduct, uterus, and cervix) were removed from mice and digested with collagenase (type XI, Sigma) for one hour prior to staining and flow cytometry.

(109) Intracellular Cytokine Staining. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were infected with C. trachomatis L2 at an MOI of 5:1 for 16-18 hours. T cells were added at an effector-to-target ratio of 5:1 and incubated for another 6 hours in the presence of brefeldin A (Pharmingen). Cells were permeabilized and stained for the presence of IFN?. Cells were then analyzed using standard flow cytometric techniques on a FACS can flow cytometer.

(110) Protection Assay. Ten days after T cell restimulation, 10.sup.7 T cells were washed twice with PBS and adoptively transferred into C57BL/6 recipient mice. Mice were then infected i.v. with 10.sup.7 IFUs C. trachomatis L2. Spleens were titered three days later on a McCoy cell monolayer. As controls, na?ve mice and Chlamydia-immune mice were also infected with C. trachomatis L2 and spleens were titered three days later.

(111) Intrauterine Infection. Intrauterine infection with C. trachomatis was carried out by surgical inoculation of the uterine horns with 10.sup.6 IFUs C. trachomatis L2. Draining (iliac) and non-draining (axillary, cervical, mandibular) lymph nodes were harvested and single cell suspensions were analyzed using standard flow cytometric techniques on a FACScan flow cytometer.

(112) CT788 Polypeptide Expression

(113) A CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof may be produced by transformation of a suitable host cell with all or part of a polypeptide-encoding polynucleotide molecule or fragment thereof in a suitable expression vehicle.

(114) Those skilled in the field of molecular biology will understand that any of a wide variety of expression systems may be used to provide the polypeptide CT788 or fragment thereof. The precise host cell used is not critical to the invention. The CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof may be produced in a prokaryotic host (e.g., E. coli) or in a eukaryotic host (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, insect cells, e.g., Sf21 cells, or mammalian cells, e.g., NIH 3T3, HeLa, or preferably COS cells). Such cells are available from a wide range of sources (e.g., the American Type Culture Collection, Rockland, Md.; also, see, e.g., Ausubel et al., supra). The method of transformation or transfection and the choice of expression vehicle will depend on the host system selected. Transformation and transfection methods are described, e.g., in Ausubel et al. (supra); expression vehicles may be chosen from those provided, e.g., in Cloning Vectors: A Laboratory Manual (Pouwels, P. H. et al., 1985, Supp. 1987).

(115) Once the recombinant CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof is expressed, it is isolated, e.g., using affinity chromatography. In one example, an antibody raised against a CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof may be attached to a column and used to isolate the recombinant polypeptide. Lysis and fractionation of polypeptide-harboring cells prior to affinity chromatography may be performed by standard methods (see, e.g., Ausubel et al., supra).

(116) Once isolated, the recombinant CT788 polypeptide or fragment thereof can, if desired, be further purified, e.g., by high performance liquid chromatography (see, e.g., Fisher, Laboratory Techniques In Biochemistry And Molecular Biology, eds., Work and Burdon, Elsevier, 1980).

(117) Short fragments of CT788, can also be produced by chemical synthesis (e.g., by the methods described in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed., 1984 The Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.).

(118) Also included in the invention are CT788 proteins or fragments thereof fused to heterologous sequences, such as detectable markers (for example, proteins that may be detected directly or indirectly such as green fluorescent protein, hemagglutinin, or alkaline phosphatase), DNA binding domains (for example, GAL4 or LexA), gene activation domains (for example, GAL4 or VP16), purification tags, or secretion signal peptides. These fusion proteins may be produced by any standard method. Fusion protein may also include fusions to immunogenic proteins such as an Ig protein, e.g., as IgG, IgM, IgA, or IgE or the Fc region of an Ig protein. For production of stable cell lines expressing a CT788 fusion protein, PCR-amplified CT788 nucleic acids may be cloned into the restriction site of a derivative of a mammalian expression vector. For example, KA, which is a derivative of pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) contains a DNA fragment encoding an influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA). Alternatively, vector derivatives encoding other tags, such as c-myc or poly Histidine tags, can be used.

(119) Other sequences that may be fused to CT788 include those that provide immunostimulatory function, such as interleukin-2 (Fan et al., Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 38:683-690, 2006), Toll-like receptor-5 flagellin (Huleatt et al., Vaccine 8:763-775, 2007), simian immunodeficiency virus Tat (Chen et al., Vaccine 24:708-715, 2006), or fibrinogen-albumin-IgG receptor of group C streptococci (Schulze et al., Vaccine 23:1408-1413, 2005). In addition, heterologous sequences may be added to enhance solubility or increase half-life, for example, hydrophilic amino acid residues (Murby et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 230:38-44, 1995), glycosylation sequences (Sinclair and Elliott, J. Pharm. Sci. 94:1626-1635, 2005), or the carboxy terminus of human chorionic gonadotropin or thrombopoeitin (Lee et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 339:380-385, 2006).

(120) Vaccine Production

(121) The invention also provides for a vaccine composition including a CT788 polypeptide, an fragment (e.g., an immunogenic fragment) of CT788, any polypeptide identified in a method of the invention, or an fragment (e.g., an immunogenic fragment) thereof. The vaccine may further include an additional antigenic peptide fragment (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, or more different fragments). The invention further includes a method of inducing an immunological response in an individual, particularly a human, the method including inoculating the individual with a CT788 polypeptide or a fragment or fragments thereof (e.g., an immunogenic fragment), in a suitable carrier for the purpose of inducing an immune response to protect an individual from infection, particularly bacterial infection, and most particularly Chlamydia infection. The administration of this immunological composition may be used either therapeutically in individuals already experiencing an infection, or may be used prophylactically to prevent an infection.

(122) The preparation of vaccines that contain immunogenic polypeptides is known to one skilled in the art. The CT788 polypeptide, fragment of a CT788 polypeptide, polypeptide identified in a method of the invention, or fragment thereof may serve as an antigen for vaccination, or an expression vector encoding the polypeptide, or fragments or variants thereof, might be delivered in vivo in order to induce an immunological response comprising the production of antibodies or, in particular, a T cell immune response.

(123) A CT788 polypeptide, polypeptide identified in a method of the invention, or fragment or variant thereof may be fused to a recombinant protein that stabilizes the polypeptide, aids in its solubilization, facilitates its production or purification, or acts as an adjuvant by providing additional stimulation of the immune system. The compositions and methods comprising the polypeptides or nucleotides of the invention and immunostimulatory DNA sequences are described in (Sato et al., Science 273:352, 1996).

(124) Typically vaccines are prepared in an injectable form, either as a liquid solution or as a suspension. Solid forms suitable for injection may also be prepared as emulsions, or with the polypeptides encapsulated in liposomes. Vaccine antigens are usually combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, which includes any carrier that does not induce the production of antibodies harmful to the individual receiving the carrier. Suitable carriers typically comprise large macromolecules that are slowly metabolized, such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, lipid aggregates, and inactive virus particles. Such carriers are well known to those skilled in the art. These carriers may also function as adjuvants.

(125) Adjuvants are immunostimulating agents that enhance vaccine effectiveness. Effective adjuvants include, but are not limited to, aluminum salts such as aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, muramyl peptides (e.g., muramyl dipeptide), bacterial cell wall components, saponin adjuvants, and other substances that act as immunostimulating agents to enhance the effectiveness of the composition. Other adjuvants include liposomal formulations, synthetic adjuvants, such as saponins (e.g., QS21), monophosphoryl lipid A, and polyphosphazine.

(126) Immunogenic compositions of the invention, e.g., the CT788 polypeptide, a CT788 fragment, polypeptide identified in a method of the invention, or a fragment thereof, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and adjuvant, also typically contain diluents, such as water, saline, glycerol, ethanol. Auxiliary substances may also be present, such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, and the like. Proteins may be formulated into the vaccine as neutral or salt forms. The vaccines are typically administered parenterally, by injection; such injection may be subcutaneous, intradermal, intramuscular, intravenous, or intraperitoneal. Additional formulations are suitable for other forms of administration, such as by suppository or orally. Oral compositions may be administered as a solution, suspension, tablet, pill, capsule, or sustained release formulation. Vaccines may also be administered by an ocular, intranasal, gastric, pulmonary, intestinal, rectal, vaginal, or urinary tract route. The administration can be achieved in a single dose or repeated at intervals. The appropriate dosage depends on various parameters that are understood by those skilled in the art, such as the nature of the vaccine itself, the route of administration, and the condition of the mammal to be vaccinated (e.g., the weight, age, and general health of the mammal).

(127) In addition, the vaccine can also be administered to individuals to generate polyclonal antibodies (purified or isolated from serum using standard methods) that may be used to passively immunize an individual. These polyclonal antibodies can also serve as immunochemical reagents.

(128) Antigenic peptides (e.g., CT788 peptides such as those described herein including CT788.sub.133-152 or any fragment thereof) may also be administered as fusion peptides. For example, a polypeptide or polypeptide derivative may be fused to a polypeptide having adjuvant activity, such as, e.g., subunit B of either cholera toxin or E. coli heat-labile toxin. Several possibilities are can be used for achieving fusion. First, the polypeptide of the invention can be fused to the N- or C-terminal end of the polypeptide having adjuvant activity. Second, a polypeptide fragment can be fused within the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide having adjuvant activity.

(129) Pharmaceutical Compositions

(130) In addition to vaccines, the invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions that include a polypeptide or a fragment thereof identified using a method of the invention or compositions that include at CT788 polypeptide or a fragment thereof (e.g., an immunogenic fragment or any fragment described herein). Such compositions may be incorporated into a pharmaceutical composition, dispersed in a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier, vehicle or diluent. In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition includes a pharmaceutically-acceptable excipient. The compounds of the present invention may be administered by any suitable means, depending, for example, on their intended use, as is well known in the art, based on the present description. For example, if compounds of the present invention are to be administered orally, they may be formulated as tablets, capsules, granules, powders or syrups. Alternatively, formulations of the present invention may be administered parenterally as injections (intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous), drop infusion preparations or suppositories. For application by the ophthalmic mucous membrane route, compounds of the present invention may be formulated as eye drops or eye ointments. These formulations may be prepared by conventional means, and, if desired, the compounds may be mixed with any conventional additive, such as an excipient, a binder, a disintegrating agent, a lubricant, a corrigent, a solubilizing agent, a suspension aid, an emulsifying agent or a coating agent.

(131) Subject compounds may be suitable for oral, nasal, topical (including buccal and sublingual), rectal, vaginal, aerosol and/or parenteral administration. The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form and may be prepared by any methods well known in the art of pharmacy. The amount of agent that may be combined with a carrier material to produce a single dose vary depending upon the subject being treated, and the particular mode of administration.

(132) Pharmaceutical compositions of this invention suitable for parenteral administration includes one or more components of a supplement in combination with one or more pharmaceutically-acceptable sterile isotonic aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, dispersions, suspensions or emulsions, or sterile powders which may be reconstituted into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions just prior to use, which may contain antioxidants, buffers, bacteriostats, solutes which render the formulation isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient or suspending or thickening agents.

(133) Methods of Treating a Pathogenic Disease or Neoplasm

(134) The polypeptides, vaccines, and pharmaceutical compositions described herein may be used in a variety of treatments of diseases including a pathogenic infection and in the treatment of a neoplastic disorder. Those skilled in the art will understand, the dosage of any composition described herein will vary depending on the symptoms, age and body weight of the patient, the nature and severity of the disorder to be treated or prevented, the route of administration, and the form of the supplement. Any of the subject formulations may be administered in any suitable dose, such as, for example, in a single dose or in divided doses. Dosages for the compounds of the present invention, alone or together with any other compound of the present invention, or in combination with any compound deemed useful for the particular disorder, disease or condition sought to be treated, may be readily determined by techniques known to those of skill in the art. Also, the present invention provides mixtures of more than one subject compound, as well as other therapeutic agents.

(135) The combined use of several compounds of the present invention, or alternatively other therapeutic agents, may reduce the required dosage for any individual component because the onset and duration of effect of the different components may be complimentary. In such combined therapy, the different active agents may be delivered together or separately, and simultaneously or at different times within the day.

(136) Therapeutic Antibodies and T-Cell Depletion

(137) Alternatively, the immune response to Chlamydia, rather than the infection itself, may be responsible for symptoms which accompany infection, including sterility and pelvic inflammatory disease. In this case, it may be desirable to limit the immune response by a subset of CD4.sup.+ or CD8.sup.+ T-cells within an infected individual. Antibodies targeted towards T-cell clones identified in the methods of the invention (e.g., antibodies specific to CD4.sup.+ cells targeted to CT788) may therefore be useful in treating or preventing deleterious effects associated with Chlamydia infection. Methods for selective depletion of specific populations of T-cell are described, for example, in Weinberg et al., Nat Med. 2(2):183-189, 1996.

(138) All patents, patent applications, and publications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each independent patent, patent application, or publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.